Loading...
G-08-10-09-7B1 - 10/9/2008ORDINANCE NO. Cj -Oar io'09 -?e I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, SECTION 9.2304, CODE OF ORDINANCES (1995 EDITION), CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO MOTOR VEHICLE IDLING; AND ADDING ADDITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE; AND PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS: I. Chapter 9, Section 9.2304, Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, is hereby amended to read as follows: 9.2304 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (1) The following constitute affirmative defenses to prosecution under this ordinance: (a) the motor vehicle has a gross vehicle weight rating of 14,000 pounds or less; (b) the motor vehicle is/was forced to remain motionless because of traffic conditions over which the operator has no control; (c) the motor vehicle being used by the United States military, national guard, or reserve forces, or as an emergency or law enforcement motor vehicle; (d) the primary propulsion engine of the motor vehicle provides a power source necessary for mechanical operation, not including (i) propulsion and (ii) passenger compartment heating or air conditioning. (e) the primary propulsion engine of the motor vehicle is being operated for maintenance or diagnostic purposes; (f) the primary propulsion engine of a motor vehicle is being operated solely to defrost a windshield; (g) the primary propulsion engine of a motor vehicle is being used to supply heat or air conditioning necessary for passenger comfort/safety in those motor vehicles intended for commercial or public passenger transportation, or passenger transit operations, in which case idling up to a maximum of thirty (30) minutes is allowed; (h) the primary propulsion engine of a motor vehicle is used for passenger transit operations in which case idling up to a maximum of thirty (30) minutes is allowed; (i) the primary propulsion engine of a motor vehicle being used to provide air conditioning or heating necessary for employee health or safety while the 0:\WDOX\ORDINANC\081009B1.DOC/m1 employee is using the vehicle to perform an essential job function related to roadway construction or maintenance; (j) the primary propulsion engine of a motor vehicle is being used as airport ground support equipment; (k) the owner of a motor vehicle rented or leased to a person that operates the vehicle and is not employed by the owner; or (1) the motor vehicle is idling in order to power a heater or air condition while a driver is using the vehicle's sleeper berth for a government -mandated rest period and is not within two miles of a facility offering external heating and air conditioning connections at a time when those connections are available. This subsection expires September 1, 2009. (2) Burden of Proof For any violation of Section 9.2300, the person seeking to establish an affirmative defense shall have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that an event that would otherwise be a violation of this idling ordinance was caused by one of the affirmative defenses allowed in Section 9.2304(1). II. A. All ordinances, parts of ordinances, or resolutions in conflict herewith are expressly repealed. B. The invalidity of any section or provision of this ordinance shall not invalidate other sections or provisions thereof. C. The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of the meeting at which this Ordinance was adopted was posted and that such meeting was open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Ordinance and the subject matter hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. 2 Alternative 1. By motion duly made, seconded and passed with an affirmative vote of all the Council members present, the requirement for reading this ordinance on two separate days was dispensed with. READ, PASSED, and ADOPTED on first reading this day of , 2008. Alternative 2. READ and APPROVED on first reading this the day of , 2008. READ, APPROVED and ADOPTED on second reading this the day of , 2008. ALAN MCGRAW, Mayor City of Round Rock, Texas SARA L. WHITE, City Secretary 3 DATE: October 1, 2008 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting — October 9, 2008 ITEM: 7B1. Consider an ordinance amending Chapter 9, Section 9.2304 amending the affirmative defenses for violations of the Motor Vehicle Idling regulations. (First Reading) Department: Staff Person: Justification: Transportation Services Thomas G. Martin, Director of Transportation Services This amendment will update the City ordinance relative to heavy duty vehicle idling so that it mirrors 30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 114, Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles, in compliance with a Memorandum of Agreement executed between the City and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Funding: Cost: N/A Source of funds: N/A Outside Resources: Background Information: On November 22, 2005 the City Council enacted an ordinance prohibiting idling of heavy duty vehicles; this ordinance mirrored 30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 114, Subchapter J, Operation Controls for Motor Vehicles, Division 2, Locally Enforced Motor Vehicle Idling Limitations, Sections 114.510 - 114.512 and 114.517. On June 12, 2008, the City Council executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the TCEQ related to the local enforcement of heavy duty vehicle idling. This MOA required that any city ordinances related to heavy duty vehicle idling must mirror the state rule. Since initially enacting the city ordinance, the state rules have been amended to allow three additional affirmative defenses to prosecution. Approval of this ordinance amendment would align the City's ordinance with the state statute. Public Comment: N/A