R-10-11-23-11E3 - 11/23/2010RESOLUTION NO. R -10-11-23-11E3
WHEREAS, the City of Round Rock has previously entered into a Contract for Engineering
Services ("Contract") with Rodriguez Transportation Group, Inc. for the Chisholm Trail Road
Reconstruction/Parkway Extension Project, and
WHEREAS, Rodriguez Transportation Group, Inc. has submitted Supplemental Contract No.
2 to the Contract to modify the provisions for the scope of services, and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to enter into said Supplemental Contract No. 2 with
Rodriguez Transportation Group, Inc., Now Therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS,
That the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City Supplemental
Contract No. 2 to the Contract with Rodriguez Transportation Group, Inc., a copy of same being
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes.
The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and
subject of the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted was posted and that such meeting was
open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Resolution and the subject matter
hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act,
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended.
RESOLVED this 23rd day of November, 2010.
ALAN MCGRAW, Mayor
City of Round Rock, Texas
ATTEST:
21)41vL. 0,1ibbP
SARA L. WHITE, City Secretary
Of wdox\SCC1nts\0112\ 1005\MUNICIPAL\00207849. DOC/rmc
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
I.
EXHIBIT
•
SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT NO. 2
TO CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
FIRM: RODRIGUEZ TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
ADDRESS: 11211 Taylor Draper Lane, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78759
PROJECT: Chisholm Trail Road Reconstruction/Parkway Extension
("Engineer")
This Supplemental Contract No. 2 to Contract for Engineering Services is made by and between
the City of Round Rock, Texas, hereinafter called the "City" and Rodriguez Transportation
Group, Inc., hereinafter called the "Engineer".
WHEREAS, the City and Engineer executed a Contract for Engineering Services, hereinafter
called the "Contract", on the 9th day of October, 2008 for the Chisholm Trail Road
Reconstruction/Parkway Extension Project in the amount of $732,052.90; and
WHEREAS, the City and Engineer executed Supplemental Contract No. 1 on March 11, 2010 to
amend the scope of services and to increase the compensation by $168,791.39 to a total of
$900,844.29; and
WHEREAS, it has become necessary to amend the Contract to modify the provisions for the
scope of services and to increase the compensation by $120,968.08 to a total of $1,021,812.37;
and
NOW THEREFORE, premises considered, the City and the Engineer agree that said Contract
is amended as follows:
I.
Article 2. Engineering Services and Exhibit B. Engineering Services shall be amended as set
forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Work Schedule shall be amended as
set forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit C.
II.
Article 4. Compensation and Exhibit D. Fee Schedule shall be amended by increasing by
$120,968.08 the lump sum amount payable under the Contract for a total of $1,021,812.37, as
shown by the attached Addendum to Exhibit D.
Supplemental Contract Rev.12/01/08
0199.7080; 00206611 84275
STI 1 CHSM
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Engineer have executed this Supplemental
Contract in duplicate.
RODRIGUEZ TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
By: /✓if /ci�
(�%NIK E./2'i2/d k OGS, -i
N-25- 4i
Date
CITY OF ROUND ROCK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Alan McGraw, Mayor Stephan L. Sheets, City Attorney
Date
Supplemental Contract Rev.12/01/08
0199.7080; 00206611 84275
STI ICHSM
2
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT B
Engineering Services
The additional Scope of Work to be performed by the Engineer under this Supplemental Contract is
described as follows:
• The City of Round Rock requested revisions to the Phase 1 plan set to include a multiple box
culvert at the Onion Branch stream crossing instead of the previously proposed 250 -feet
bridge. Revisions to the plan set include but are not limited to the following: roadway
profile adjustment resulting from the incorporation of the multiple box culvert, storm drain
re -design resulting from the roadway profile adjustment and incorporation of the multiple
box culvert, revisions to the retaining wall layouts and driveway details resulting from the
roadway profile adjustment, and revisions to various plan sheets including (fencing layout,
erosion control plan, illumination layout, etc.).
FUNCTION CODE 130 (ROW and UTILITY COORDINATION)
Revisions to the storm drain systems, required to incorporate to multiple box culvert, requires
additional effort to re-evaluate conflicts with existing and/or proposed utilities. Adjustment to the
plans as a result of the ROW acquisition process also required additional utility coordination.
Utility Meetings
1. The Engineer will attend a maximum of six (6) additional utility meetings organized by the
City. The Engineer is to be in attendance to present plan information and answer questions
about the project.
Utility Conflict Identification
1. The Engineer shall continue to identify potential utility conflicts and coordinate with the City
and the utility companies to help resolve the conflicts. The Engineer will make changes to
the plans as requested by the City in an attempt to accommodate existing utilities. The
Engineer will coordinate with the City on the requested changes.
ROW Coordination
1. The Engineer shall prepare exhibits as requested by the City in an attempt to expedite the
ROW acquisition process.
FUNCTION CODE 150 (FIELD SURVEY)
The various design changes (including the conversion from a bridge to a multiple box culvert) and
the ROW acquisition process will require multiple revisions to the ROW documents. The ROW
acquisition process and Utility coordination has resulted in multiple requests for the staking of
existing and proposed ROW and easements limits. The following defines additional services that
will be or have been performed:
Right -of -Way Surveying and Mapping:
1. Revise parcel plats and descriptions and show those revisions on the ROW strip map.
Revisions may be summarized as follows:
1
• Prepare two (2) plats and descriptions for additional drainage easements
• Stake out the entire limits of the right-of-way to the level required to allow utility
companies to relocate their utilities.
• Stake out the proposed Chisholm Parkway face of curb to allow utility companies to
confirm that utility conflicts do not exist.
• Prepare a survey plat and description for a proposed 15 acre acquisition located south of
Onion Branch adjacent to the west ROW.
Design Surveys:
1. Stake out ROW and/or easements to assist with the following:
• Stake out the entire limits of the proposed ROW to the level required to allow utility
companies to relocate their utilities.
• Stake out the proposed Chisholm Parkway face of curb to allow utility companies to
confirm that utility conflicts do not exist.
FUNCTION CODE 160 (ROADWAY DESIGN)
The conversion from a bridge to a multiple box culvert results in revisions to the following Phase 1
plan sheets:
MISCELLANEOUS PLANS
1. INDEX OF SHEETS - The Engineer will revise the index of sheets, including standards,
resulting from the multiple box culvert design.
2. PROJECT LAYOUT — The Engineer will revise the project layout sheets to include the
multiple box culvert design.
ROADWAY PLANS & GEOMETRY
1. PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS - Proposed typical sections, in the vicinity of the
proposed retaining walls will be revised to include the multiple box culvert design.
2. PLAN AND PROFILE — Roadway plan and profile sheets, in the vicinity of the roadway
profile adjustment, will be revised.
GRADING AND DETAILS
1. DRIVEWAY DETAILS — Driveway details will be revised for each driveway impacted by
the roadway profile adjustment.
2. GRADING DETAILS (OFFSITE) — Offsite grading details will be revised to account for the
floodplain boundary changes associated with the conversion from a bridge to a multiple box
culvert. An additional grading detail will be developed for the area located south of Onion
Branch on Parcel 19 adjacent to the Chisholm Trail Road east ROW.
FUNCTION CODE 161 (HYDRAULIC DESIGN)
The roadway profile adjustment resulting from the conversion of the bridge to a multiple box culvert
requires the re -design of multiple storm drain systems. Drainage sheets that will be re -designed for
the Phase 1 construction plans will include:
2
STORM SEWER DESIGN
1. INTERIOR DRAINAGE AREA MAPS - Interior drainage area maps will be revised
where impacted by the roadway profile adjustment.
2. RUN-OFF AND INLET COMPUTATIONS - Run-off to each inlet and inlet hydraulic
information will be revised where impacted by the roadway profile adjustment.
3. STORM SEWER COMPUTATIONS - Storm sewers computations will be revised where
impacted by the roadway profile adjustment.
4. DRAINAGE PLAN AND PROFILES - Drainage plan and profile sheets will be revised
where impacted by the roadway profile adjustment.
5. LATERAL PROFILES - Lateral profile sheets will be revised where impacted by the
roadway profile adjustment.
6. CULVERT LAYOUT — A culvert layout will be generated for the proposed culvert at
Onion Branch
WATER QUALITY AND DETENTION
1. WATER QUALITY — The Engineer will revise the pond details where impacted by the
roadway profile adjustments.
WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT PLAN (WPAP) AND ORGANIZED SEWAGE
COLLECTION SYSTEM PLAN (OSCSP)
1. GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT — The Engineer will update the geological assessment to
include the additional proposed off-site grading.
CULVERT HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
1. CULVERT HYDRAULICS — The Engineer will revise the approved HEC -RAS CLOMR
proposed conditions models created for the proposed 250' bridge option and make
adjustments as needed to model the proposed roadway profile adjustment and multiple box
culvert design.
2. FEMA FLOODPLAIN EVALUATION — The Engineer will coordinate findings of the
hydrology and hydraulics analysis through the City and with the local floodplain
administrator.
3. LETTER OF MAP REVISION (LOMR) APPLICATION — The Engineer will prepare and
process a LOMR through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
a. Prepare the application including:
i. MT -2 Form 1
ii. MT -2 Form 2
1. The City will provide list of all affected owners complete with
contact information including mailing address.
iii. MT -2 Form 3
iv. Payment Information Form
v. Work Map
b. Process the application including:
i. Submittal
ii. Address comments
iii. Resubmittal
3
FUNCTION CODE 163 (MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY PLANS)
MSE RETAINING WALLS - Adjusting the design to expedite ROW acquisition required the re-
design of the east retaining wall (south of Onion Branch). Revisions to the plan sheets include the
following:
1. RETAINING WALL LAYOUTS - The Engineer will revise the retaining wall layouts where
impacted by the roadway profile adjustments
QUANTITIES/SUMMARY SHEETS — The Engineer will revise the quantity/summary sheets as a
result of the conversion from a bridge to a multiple box culvert.
FUNCTION CODE 190 (PROJECT MANAGEMENT)
The anticipated completion date following the execution of Supplemental Contract No. 1 was July
2010. The anticipated completion date for Phase 1 and Phase 2 is being extended by six (6) months
to January 2011. The work effort and the management for the project included in this contract will
be conducted in the Engineer's office in Austin, Texas. At a minimum, monthly progress reports
will be submitted, which will detail on-going work as well as work accomplished since the previous
report. Additional project management duties will include the following:
1. Development and implementation of QA/QC plan
2. Coordination with the sub -consultants and all project resources
P:183506021contract\SWA2\ex6B CfCP SC2.doc
4
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT C
Work Schedule
Attached Behind This Page
1000 Texas Historical Commission Acceptance Lett
1020 FEMA Acceptance Letter for Proposed CLOM
1030 TCEQ Review & Approval of WPAP (Rec'd)
1040 TCEQ Review & Approval of OSCA (Ph. 1)(Rec
1050 Right of Way Surveying and Mapping
1060 Continue Utility Coordination
1070 TCEQ Review & Approval of WPAP (Update)
1080 Revise Plans & Dev. Gen Notes, Spec., etc.
1090 Development of Proposed LOMR
1100 Revise Summaries, Est. & Const. Time Line
1110 Internal 95% QA/QC Review
1120 Finalize Summaries, Est. & Const. Time Line
1130 Finalize Gen. Notes, Spec. & Provisions
1140 Assemble Final PS&E Documents
1150 Submit Final Plans & Documents
3000 Continue Development of Detailed Plan Sheel
3010 Continue Utility Coordination
3020 Final Plans & Dev. Gen.Notes, Spec.& Provisiq
3030 Update Design Cross Sections
3040 Update Summaries, Est. & Const. Time Line
3050 Internal 90% QA/QC Review
3060 Submit 90% Plans & Documents for Review
4000 Incorporate Review Comments into the Plans
4010 Finalize Summaries, Est. & Const. Time Line
4020 Finalize Gen. Notes, Spec. & Provisions MIII
4030 Assemble Final PS&E Documents
4040 Submit Final Plans & Documents
1
Run Date: 10/18/2010
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT D
Fee Schedule
Attached Behind This Page
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT D
Fee Schedule
LAISUK CUS 115:
DIRECT
LABOR
OVERHEAD
144.007.
TOTAL
LABURiUVHD
FIXED FEE
11.UU14
TOTAL
COST
F.C. 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
F.C. 120 ENVIRON. STUDIES & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
$ -
$ -
$ -
S •
$ -
F.C.130 ROW AND UTILITY COORDINATION
$ 4,578.00
$ 6,592.32
5 11,170.32
$ 1,228.74
S 12,399.06
F.C.180 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ •
$ -
F.C. 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS
$ 4,351.00
$ 6,265.44
$ 10,616.44
$ 1,167.81
$ 11,764.25
F.C. 161 DRAINAGE
$ 9,207.00
$ 13,258.08
$ 22,465.08
$ 2,471.16
$ 24,938.24
F.C. 162 SIGNING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNALIZATION
$ 88.50
S 127.44
$ 215.94
$ 23.75
$ 239.69
F.C. 163 MISCELLANEOUS (ROADWAY)
$ 2,544.50
$ 3,664.08
$ 6,208.58
5 682.94
5 6,891.52
F.C. 170 BRIDGE DESIGN
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
F.C. 190 PROJECT MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION
5 4,124.00
5 5,938.56
5 10,062.56
$ 1,106.88
5 11,169.44
TOTALS
E $ 24,893.00 1$ 35,845.92
$ 60,738.92
S 6,681.28
$ 67,420.20
DIRECT COSTS:
EXPENSES:
UNIT
RATE
QUANTITY
TOTAL
Final Ortho -photography Plots
SF
S •
$ -
Reproduction
SF
$ -
$ -
'
Mileage
Mile
S -
$ -
Aldine Flights
EA
$ -
$ -
Per Diem
Day
$ -
$
Mali & Detivedes
EA
$ -
$ -
5 -
$ -
$ -
TOTAL EXPENSES
$ -
SUB -CONTRACTS:
TASK
TOTAL
McGray& McGray
ROW Maps & Design Surveys
$ 25,910.00
K Fdese & Associates
Culvert Layout, Hydraulics & LOMR
$ 26,137.88
Woodruff Geologic Consulting
Geologlc Assessment
$ 1,600.00
TOTAL SUB -CONTRACTS
$ 53,647.88
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$ 53,547.88
TOTAL COST
1 $ 120,968.08
PROJECT INFORMATION
Chisholm Trail/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
RATES
bentor tngineer t4
rroject manager to
rroject tngineer tz
uestgn tngineer t 1
Engineering Specialist II ES2
bentor tnglneertng t ecnntctan bt I
tngineering t ecnntcian t 1
Z. ou.UU
04.uu
4) 4z.uu
4) at3.uu
$ 41.00
4) 34.00
4) sz.uu
hour
hour
hour
hour
Hour
hour
hour
Final Ortho -photography Plots
Reproduction
Mileage
Airline Flights
Per Diem
Mail & Deliveries
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
SF
SF
Mile
EA
Day
EA
Overhead Elate
Profit
144.00%
11.00%
PROJECT DETAILS
Project Duration
rroject Length
Railroad Crossings
Bridges
Channels (Requiring Sections)
Bridge Class Culverts
Other Culverts
Retention/ Detention Ponds
Traffic Signals
Overhead Sign Bridges (OSB)
Cantilever Overhead Signs (COSS)
Large Signs
ROW Parcels
Agency / Commitee meetings
Public Meetings
Public Hearings
Environmental Documents: Cat Ex
EA
EIS
6
12(U
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Month
MI
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Pndrinr rate Transnnrthflon Groto. Inc
RTG SHEET COUNT
Chisholm Trail/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
F.C. 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS
Scale No Hrs / Ea
Notes
1,85 Sneet 1 2.0
Sheet Index 1 2.0
Project Layout 200 1 2.0
Typical Sections 20 2 3.0
Horizontal & Vertical Control Data Sheet 0 4.0
Horizontal Alignment Data Sheets 0 5.0
Pian / Profile Sheets 50 3 6.0
Intersection Detafis/Driveway Details 20 2 6.0
Miscellaneous Roadway Detail 1 27.0
Removal Plans 100 0 10.0
Tree Protection Plan/Miscellaneous Details 20 0 25.0
Design Cross Sections 1 30.0
E&Q Sheets and Roadway Summaries 1 4.0
Standards' 0 2.0
Driveway Revisions (5 driveways)
Offsite Grading Detail & Fencing Layout Revision
FC 160 Total
13 7.92
F.C. 161 DRAINAGE
Scale No Hrs / Ea
Notes
un -site uramage Area Maps 200 'L 4.0
interior Drainage Area Maps 50 3 6.0
Runoff and Inlet Computations 1 4.0
Stone Sewer Computations 4 6.0
Storm Drain Pian & Profile 100 3 12.0
Storni Drain Lateral Profiles 2 10.0
Misc Drainage Details 0 20.0
Bridge Hydraulics 0 150.0
Water Pollution Abatement Plan 0 80.0
SW3P Title Sheet 0 10.0
SW3P Pian Sheets 100 3 6.0
Misc. Erosion Control Plan Sheet 0 3.0
BMP Design NfaterQuality Pond Layouts 1 80.0
FEMA Floodplaln Evaluation and CLOMR 0 160.0
Intel and Manhole and Erosion Control Summary 3 6.0
Water Quality Pond Summary 1 4.0
Standards 0 2.0
Water Quality Pond/Stormceptor Revision
FC 161 Total
23 9.83
F.C. 162 SIGNING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNALIZATION
Scale No Hrs / Ea
Notes
signing & Pavement Marwng Layout
Signing & Pavement Maddng Layout (Existing Roadway)
Existing Sign Removal Layouts
Large Sign Details
Small Sign Details
Overhead Sign Support Details (Tabular)
Overhead Sign Elevations
Signal Layouts and Details
Pavement Marking Summary
Small Sign Summaries
Large Sign Summaries
Standards
10U
1 2.0
0 8.0
O 0.0
0 15.0
O 15.0
O 0.0
o 20.0
O 0.0
O 15.0
0 15.0
O 9.0
O 2.0
FC 182 Total
1 2.00
F.C.163 MISCELLANIOUS (ROADWAY)
Scale No Hrs / Ea
Notes
ICP Naffaave Sequence of (onsIUCeon 1 J,0
TCP Typical Sections 0 15.0
TCP Horizontal Alignment Data 0 10,0
Traffic Control Plan (3 Phases) 100 1 2.0
TCP Road Closure Detour layout 0 15.0
Safety Review Meeting 0 20.0
Retaking Wall Boring Logs/Legends 0 10.0
Retaining Wall Horizontal Alignment Data 0 5.0
Retaining Wall Typical Sections 1 4.0
Retaining Wall Layouts 40 4 8.0
[Rumination Layouts 50 2 6.0
TCP and Retaining Wall Summaries 2 2.0
Utility Layouts 50 0 15.0
Standards 0 2.0
Revision to the TCP (Overall) Layout
Illumination Layout & Electrical Service Data Sheet
FC 163 Total
11 5.18
F.C. 170 BRIDGE DESIGN
Scale No Hrs / Ea
Notes
wage Layouts
Bridge Details
Bridge Summaries
Standards'
u u.0
O 0.0
O 0.0
u 0.0
FC 170 Total
0 0.00
Standards not included in sheet totals
PLAN SET TOTAL
48 8.08
RTG MANHOUR ESTIMATE
Sheet 1 of 2
Chisholm TraHI/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
. ' I • " • T ' ` • ' 1 • ' 1 1 ` ' • `
E4
E3
14
24
10
E2
0 V
ES2
40
40
SET
- 0
ET
0
o a
1.4.0
24.0
50.0
0.0
Project Meetings tesumateo Ca: 4 mbeungsl
Project Management (extended duration = 6 months)
QAIQC (Phase 2)
C' %4 Total
0
46
0
86.0
F.C. 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES
E4
E3
E2
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
Utility Meetings (max. of 6)
12.0
u.0
Utility Coordination (Misc.)
10.0
10.0
0.0
Utility Conflict Identification
20.0
•
0.0
ROW Coordination
20.0
20.0
0.0
Prepare Punch List
0.0
Prepare "As -Built" Pian Set
0.0
C 120 Total
0
62
0
0
30
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 110 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 102 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
`T -•` lig ' • •1: "• ' 1 1
E4
E3
2
El
ES
S
ET
oa
Utility Meetings (max. of 6)
12.0
0.0
Utility Coordination (Misc.)
10.0
10.0
0.0
Utility Conflict Identification
20.0
•
0.0
ROW Coordination
20.0
20.0
0.0
Prepare Punch List
0.0
Prepare "As -Built" Pian Set
0.0
C 120 Total
0
62
0
0
30
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 110 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F.C. 130 ROW AND UTILITY COORDINATION
E4
E3
E2
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
Utility Meetings (max. of 6)
12.0
12.0
Utility Coordination (Misc.)
10.0
10.0
20.0
Utility Conflict Identification
20.0
20.0
ROW Coordination
20.0
20.0
40.0
Prepare Punch List
0.0
Prepare "As -Built" Pian Set
0.0
C 120 Total
0
62
0
0
30
0
0
92
F.C. 180 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
E4
E3
E2
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
-Coordinate and Attend Pre -Construction Conference
0.0
Site Visits (Assume 12 Month Construction Duration)
0.0
Review and Approve Shop Drawings, Etc.
0.0
Review Application for Payment
0.0
Prepare Punch List
0.0
Prepare "As -Built" Pian Set
0.0
FC 351 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RTG MANHOUR ESTIMATE
Sheet 2 of 2
Chisholm'lrait/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
rt. 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS
E4
E3
E2
E1
ES2
SET
ET
Total
Title Sheet
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
Sheet Index
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
Project Layout
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
Typical Sections
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
6.0
Horizontal S Vertical Control Data Sheet
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Horizontal Alignment Data Sheets
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Plan 1 Profile Sheets
0.0
6.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
18.0
intersection Details/Driveway Details
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
8.0
2.0
0.0
12.0
Miscellaneous Roadway Details
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
18.0
4.0
0.0
27.0
Removal Plans
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Tree Protection Plan/Miscellaneous Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Design Cross Sections
0.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
24.0
0.0
0.0
30.0
E&Q Sheets and Roadway Summaries
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
4.0
Standards'
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 160 Total
0
23
2
6
50
22
0
103.0
F.C. 161 DRAINAGE
E4
E3
E2
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
OH -Site Drainage Area Maps
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
8.0
Interior Drainage Area Maps
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
18.0
Runoff and Inlet Computations
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
Storm Sewer Computations
0.0
0.0
16.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
20.0
Storm Drain Plan & Profile
0.0
2.0
24.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
36.0
Storm Drain Lateral Profiles
0.0
0.0
16.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
20.0
Misc Drainage Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bridge Hydraulics
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Water Pollution Abatement Plan
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SW3P Title Sheet
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SW3P Plan Sheets
0.0
2.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
18.0
Misc. Erosion Control Plan Sheet
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
BMP Design/Water Quality Pond Layouts
0.0
4.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
16.0
0.0
80.0
FEMA Floodplain Evacuation end CLOMR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Inlet and Manhole and Erosion Control Summary
0.0
2.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
18.0
Water Quality Pond Summary
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
Standards
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 161 Total
0
10
162
0
0
54
0
226.0
F.C.162 SIGNING, MARRINUS. AND SIGNALILATION
E4
E3
E2
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
Signing & Pavement Marking Layout
0.0
. 1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
000000000000
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Signing & Pavement Marking Layout (Existing Roadwa!
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Existing Sign Removal Layouts
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Large Sign Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Small Sign Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Overhead Sign Support Details (Tabular)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Overhead Sign Elevations
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Signal Layouts and Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pavement Marking Summary
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Small Sign Summaries
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Large Sign Summaries
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Standards
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 162 Total
0
1
0
0
0
7
0
2.0 I
F.C.163 MISCELLANEOUS (ROADWAY)
E4
E3
ET
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
TCP Narrative Sequence of Construction
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O O L N CO !J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O C
0.0
3.0
TCP Typical Sections
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TCP Horizontal Alignment Data
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Traffic Control Plan (3 Phases)
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
TCP Road Closure Detour Layout
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Safety Review Meeting
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Retailing Wail Boring Logs/Legends
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Retaining Wall Horizontal Alignment Data
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Retaining Wail Typical Sections
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
Retaining Wal Layouts '
0.0
16.0
0.0
0.0
8.0
0.0
32.0
Illumination Layouts
0.0
4.8
0.0
3.2
0.0
2.0
12.0
TCP and Retaining Wall Summaries
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
Utility Layouts
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 163 Total
0
27
0
' 3
8
17
2
57.0
F.C. 170 BRIDGE DEIGN
E4
E3
E2
El
£S2
SET
ET
Total
Bridge Layouts
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bridge Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bridge Summaries
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Standards'
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 170 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
RTG MANHOUR SUMMARY
Sheet 1 of 2
Chisholm Trail/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
F.C. 190 PROJECT MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION Manhours
Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer o $58.00
Project Manager 46 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist It 40 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
2,484.00
1,640.00
Sub -total 86 $ 4,124.00
F.C. 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES
Manhours
Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer 0 558.00 $
Project Manager 0 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist 11 0 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
Sub -total
0 $
F.C. 120 ENVIRON. STUDIES & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Manhours Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer 0 $58.00 $
Project Manager 0 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist 11 0 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
Sub -total 0
F.C. 130 ROW AND UTILITY COORDINATION
Manhours
Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer 0 $58.00 $
Project Manager 62 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist 11 30 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
3,348.00
1,230.00
Sub -total 92 $
4,578.00
F.C. 180 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES Manhours Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer 0 $58.00
Project Manager 0 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist 11 0 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
Sub -total 0 $
RTG MANHOUR SUMMARY
Sheet 2 of 2
Chisholm Trail/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
F.C. 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS
Manhours Rate Direct Labor
enior Engineer 0 $58.00 $
Project Manager 23 $54.00 $ 1,242.00
Project Engineer 2 $42.00 $ 84.00
Design Engineer 6 $36.00 $ 216.00
Engineering Specialist 1I 50 $41.00 $ 2,050.00
Senior Engineering Technician 22 $34.50 $ 759.00
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $ -
F.C. 161 DRAINAGE
Sub -total 103 $ 4,351.00
Manhours
Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer 0 $58.00 $ -
Project Manager 10 $54.00 $ 540.00
Project Engineer 162 $42.00 $ 6,804.00
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist Ii 0 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 54 $34.50 $ 1,863.00
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
Sub -total 226 $ 9,207.00
F.C. 162 SIGNING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNALIZATION Manhours Rate Direct Labor
F.C. 163
Senior Engineer
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Engineering Specialist!!
Senior Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
$$58.00
$54.00 $
$42.00 $
$36.00 $
$41.00 $
$34.50 $
$32.00 $
54.00
34.50
Sub -total
MISCELLANEOUS (ROADWAY)
2
Manhours
Rate
Direct Labor
88.50
en or ngineer
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Engineering Specialist 0
Senior Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
27
0
3
8
17
2
$54.00
$42.00
$36.00
$41.00
$34.50
$32.00
1,458.00
108.00
328.00
586.50
64.00
F.C. 170 BRIDGE DESIGN
Sub -total
57
Manhours
$ 2,544.50
Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer 0 $58.00
Project Manager 0 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist I1 0 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
Sub -total 0 $
M m
N
Q
8
O
N
On
40
O
8
to
CO
N
f0
N
LL
N
e
MOM ._ifflORMEMM
U
o
U O
LP1
c
o cn
• c
X
W
oT.
L
F-
F- Q
EE_
o Q
UU
W
z* -
M
ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY
Agenda Item No. 11E3.
City Council Agenda Summary Sheet
Agenda Caption:
Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Supplemental Contract No. 2 with
Rodriguez Transportation Group, Inc. for the Chisholm Trail Road Reconstruction/Parkway
Extension Project.
Meeting Date: November 23, 2010
Department: Infrastructure Development and Construction Management
Staff Person making presentation: Danny Halden, P.E.
City Engineer
Item Summary:
The City's consultant, Rodriguez Transportation Group. Inc. (RTG), has determined that a multiple box culvert is a
viable option to the previously designed 250 foot bridge for the Onion Creek crossing at Chisholm Trail. RTG
believes that the City will realize significant savings by installing the box culvert in lieu of the bridge. This
Supplemental Contract No. 2 will provide analyses and design services, ultimately culminating in revisions to the
plans that are necessitated by the change from a bridge to a multiple box culvert.
This Supplemental Contract No. 2 also provides for: additional surveying and engineering services related to the
right-of-way acquisition process; revisions to TCEQ-required documents; and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)
through FEMA for the Onion Creek crossing.
Strategic Plan Relevance:
Goal 26.0: Construct major element of the transportation and mobility system as approved by Council in the Master
Transportation plan.
Cost: $120,968.08
Source of Funds: 2002 General Obligation Bonds
Date of Public Hearing (if required): N/A
Recommended Action: Approval
EXECUTED
DOCUMENT
FOLLOWS
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT NO. 2
TO CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
FIRM: RODRIGUEZ TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
ADDRESS: 11211 Taylor Draper Lane, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78759
PROJECT: Chisholm Trail Road Reconstruction/Parkway Extension
("Engineer")
This Supplemental Contract No. 2 to Contract for Engineering Services is made by and between
the City of Round Rock, Texas, hereinafter called the "City" and Rodriguez Transportation
Group, Inc., hereinafter called the "Engineer".
WHEREAS, the City and Engineer executed a Contract for Engineering Services, hereinafter
called the "Contract", on the 9th day of October, 2008 for the Chisholm Trail Road
Reconstruction/Parkway Extension Project in the amount of $732,052.90; and
WHEREAS, the City and Engineer executed Supplemental Contract No. 1 on March 11, 2010 to
amend the scope of services and to increase the compensation by $168,791.39 to a total of
$900,844.29; and
WHEREAS, it has become necessary to amend the Contract to modify the provisions for the
scope of services and to increase the compensation by $120,968.08 to a total of $1,021,812.37;
and
NOW THEREFORE, premises considered, the City and the Engineer agree that said Contract
is amended as follows:
I.
Article 2, Engineering Services and Exhibit B, Engineering Services shall be amended as set
forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit B. Exhibit C, Work Schedule shall be amended as
set forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit C.
II.
Article 4, Compensation and Exhibit D, Fee Schedule shall be amended by increasing by
$120,968.08 the lump sum amount payable under the Contract for a total of $1,021,812.37, as
shown by the attached Addendum to Exhibit D.
Supplemental Contract Rev.12/01/08
0199.7080; 00206611 84275
STI 1 CHSM
-t0rt1.2- )1 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Engineer have executed this Supplemental
Contract in duplicate.
RODRIGUEZ TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
By: / (/1f .1
((I/1gc- C . i2 �,2�G��� , es , D -
Date
CITY OF ROUND ROCK
By:
Alan McGraw, Mayor
Date
p .23. 11)
Supplemental Contract
0199.7080; 00206611
STI I CHSM
2
AP
4
Steph I L. Sheets, City Attorney
VED AS T
FORM:
Rev.12/01 /08
84275
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT B
Engineering Services
The additional Scope of Work to be performed by the Engineer under this Supplemental Contract is
described as follows:
• The City of Round Rock requested revisions to the Phase 1 plan set to include a multiple box
culvert at the Onion Branch stream crossing instead of the previously proposed 250 -feet
bridge. Revisions to the plan set include but are not limited to the following: roadway
profile adjustment resulting from the incorporation of the multiple box culvert, storm drain
re -design resulting from the roadway profile adjustment and incorporation of the multiple
box culvert, revisions to the retaining wall layouts and driveway details resulting from the
roadway profile adjustment, and revisions to various plan sheets including (fencing layout,
erosion control plan, illumination layout, etc.).
FUNCTION CODE 130 (RAW and UTILITY COORDINATION)
Revisions to the storm drain systems, required to incorporate to multiple box culvert, requires
additional effort to re-evaluate conflicts with existing and/or proposed utilities. Adjustment to the
plans as a result of the ROW acquisition process also required additional utility coordination.
Utility Meetings
1. The Engineer will attend a maximum of six (6) additional utility meetings organized by the
City. The Engineer is to be in attendance to present plan information and answer questions
about the project.
Utility Conflict Identification
1. The Engineer shall continue to identify potential utility conflicts and coordinate with the City
and the utility companies to help resolve the conflicts. The Engineer will make changes to
the plans as requested by the City in an attempt to accommodate existing utilities. The
Engineer will coordinate with the City on the requested changes.
ROW Coordination
1. The Engineer shall prepare exhibits as requested by the City in an attempt to expedite the
ROW acquisition process.
FUNCTION CODE 150 (FIELD SURVEY)
The various design changes (including the conversion from a bridge to a multiple box culvert) and
the ROW acquisition process will require multiple revisions to the ROW documents. The ROW
acquisition process and Utility coordination has resulted in multiple requests for the staking of
existing and proposed ROW and easements limits. The following defines additional services that
will be or have been performed:
Right -of -Way Surveying and Mapping:
1. Revise parcel plats and descriptions and show those revisions on the ROW strip map.
Revisions may be summarized as follows:
1
• Prepare two (2) plats and descriptions for additional drainage easements
• Stake out the entire limits of the right-of-way to the level required to allow utility
companies to relocate their utilities.
• Stake out the proposed Chisholm Parkway face of curb to allow utility companies to
confirm that utility conflicts do not exist,
• Prepare a survey plat and description for a proposed 15 acre acquisition located south of
Onion Branch adjacent to the west ROW.
Design Surveys:
1. Stake out ROW and/or easements to assist with the following:
• Stake out the entire limits of the proposed ROW to the level required to allow utility
companies to relocate their utilities.
• Stake out the proposed Chisholm Parkway face of curb to allow utility companies to
confirm that utility conflicts do not exist.
FUNCTION CODE 160 (ROADWAY DESIGN)
The conversion from a bridge to a multiple box culvert results in revisions to the following Phase 1
plan sheets:
MISCELLANEOUS PLANS
1. INDEX OF SHEETS - The Engineer will revise the index of sheets, including standards,
resulting from the multiple box culvert design.
2. PROJECT LAYOUT — The Engineer will revise the project layout sheets to include the
multiple box culvert design.
ROADWAY PLANS & GEOMETRY
1. PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS - Proposed typical sections, in the vicinity of the
proposed retaining walls will be revised to include the multiple box culvert design.
2. PLAN AND PROFILE — Roadway plan and profile sheets, in the vicinity of the roadway
profile adjustment, will be revised.
GRADING AND DETAILS
1. DRIVEWAY DETAILS — Driveway details will be revised for each driveway impacted by
the roadway profile adjustment.
2. GRADING DETAILS (OFFSITE) — Offsite grading details will be revised to account for the
floodplain boundary changes associated with the conversion from a bridge to a multiple box
culvert. An additional grading detail will be developed for the area located south of Onion
Branch on Parcel 19 adjacent to the Chisholm Trail Road east ROW.
FUNCTION CODE 161 (HYDRAULIC DESIGN)
The roadway profile adjustment resulting from the conversion of the bridge to a multiple box culvert
requires the re -design of multiple storm drain systems. Drainage sheets that will be re -designed for
the Phase 1 construction plans will include:
2
STORM SEWER DESIGN
1. INTERIOR DRAINAGE AREA MAPS - Interior drainage area maps will be revised
where impacted by the roadway profile adjustment.
2. RUN-OFF AND INLET COMPUTATIONS - Run-off to each inlet and inlet hydraulic
information will be revised where impacted by the roadway profile adjustment.
3. STORM SEWER COMPUTATIONS - Storm sewers computations will be revised where
impacted by the roadway profile adjustment.
4. DRAINAGE PLAN AND PROFILES - Drainage plan and profile sheets will be revised
where impacted by the roadway profile adjustment.
5. LATERAL PROFILES - Lateral profile sheets will be revised where impacted by the
roadway profile adjustment.
6. CULVERT LAYOUT — A culvert layout will be generated for the proposed culvert at
Onion Branch
WATER QUALITY AND DETENTION
1. WATER QUALITY --- The Engineer will revise the pond details where impacted by the
roadway profile adjustments.
WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT PLAN (WPAP) AND ORGANIZED SEWAGE
COLLECTION SYSTEM PLAN (OSCSP)
1, GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT — The Engineer will update the geological assessment to
include the additional proposed off-site grading.
CULVERT HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
1. CULVERT HYDRAULICS — The Engineer will revise the approved HEC -RAS CLOMR
proposed conditions models created for the proposed 250' bridge option and make
adjustments as needed to model the proposed roadway profile adjustment and multiple box
culvert design.
2. FEMA FLOODPLAIN EVALUATION — The Engineer will coordinate findings of the
hydrology and hydraulics analysis through the City and with the local floodplain
administrator.
3. LETTER OF MAP REVISION (LOMR) APPLICATION — The Engineer will prepare and
process a LOMR through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
a. Prepare the application including:
i. MT -2 Form 1
ii. MT -2 Form 2
1. The City will provide list of all affected owners complete with
contact information including mailing address.
iii. MT -2 Form 3
iv. Payment Information Form
v. Work Map
b. Process the application including:
i. Submittal
ii. Address comments
iii. Resubmittal
3
FUNCTION CODE 163 (MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY PLANS)
MSE RETAINING WALLS - Adjusting the design to expedite ROW acquisition required the re-
design of the east retaining wall (south of Onion Branch). Revisions to the plan sheets include the
following:
1. RETAINING WALL LAYOUTS - The Engineer will revise the retaining wall layouts where
impacted by the roadway profile adjustments
QUANTITIES/SUMMARY SHEETS — The Engineer will revise the quantity/summary sheets as a
result of the conversion from a bridge to a multiple box culvert.
FUNCTION CODE 190 (PROJECT MANAGEMENT)
The anticipated completion date following the execution of Supplemental Contract No. 1 was July
2010. The anticipated completion date for Phase 1 and Phase 2 is being extended by six (6) months
to January 2011. The work effort and the management for the project included in this contract will
be conducted in the Engineer's office in Austin, Texas. At a minimum, monthly progress reports
will be submitted, which will detail on-going work as well as work accomplished since the previous
report. Additional project management duties will include the following:
1. Development and implementation of QA/QC plan
2. Coordination with the sub -consultants and all project resources
P:18350602\contr ct\SWA21exhB_CTCP SC2.doc
4
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT C
Work Schedule
Attached Behind This Page
OTOZ/8T/OT:alea una
31f1133H3S )I1IOM - Z -D 1181HX3
133FO2ld 1IV I1 1A11OHSIH3
RODRIGUEZ TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
4000
4010
4020
4030
4040
00
0
O
3040
3030
3000
3010
3020
Ln
O
I 1140 I
W
O
N
O
N
O
O
O
100
O
CO
O
OV
O
1050
1060
1040
W
O
ON
1000 Texas Historical Commission Acceptance Letter (Rec'd)I 1 1
Incorporate Review Comments into the Plans
Finalize Summaries, Est. & Const. Time Line
Finalize Gen. Notes, Spec. & Provisions
Assemble Final PS&E Documents
Submit Final Plans & Documents
Submit 90% Plans & Documents for Review
Update Summaries, Est. & Const. Time Line
Internal 90% QA/QC Review
Update Design Cross Sections
Continue Development of Detailed Plan Sheets
Continue Utility Coordination
Final Plans & Dev. Gen.Notes, Spec.& Provisions
Assemble Final PS&E Documents
Submit Final Plans & Documents
Internal 95% QA/QC Review
Finalize Summaries, Est. & Const. Time Line
Finalize Gen. Notes, Spec. & Provisions
Development of Proposed LOMR
Revise Summaries, Est. & Const. Time Line
Right of Way Surveying and Mapping
Continue Utility Coordination
TCEQ Review & Approval of WPAP (Update)
Revise Plans & Dev. Gen Notes, Spec., etc.
TCEQ Review & Approval of OSCA (Ph. 1)(Rec'd)
FEMA Acceptance Letter for Proposed CLOMR (Rec'd)
TCEQ Review & Approval of WPAP (Rec'd)
i-,
U1
tr
U7
U1
i-,
U1
Q
V7
O
O
O
N
U1
t/1
l!1
If7
60
5
30
09
06
1�
N
I--,
O
30 I
O
O
O
F,
V
K
Dl
I-,
V
K
Dl
N
V
K
CO
N
W
4,
(D
' ,
FN-,
T
(D
pa
A
T
N
F-+
FW-,
-n�
N
W
7
N
-
�+
f-,
Z
0
n
OO
1--,
0
n
N
O
---FF
A
Z
O
A
Z
O
A
Z
O
W
a
<
OO
N
o
<
n
F,
0
c
O
o
<
O
O
K
O
O
�r
O
O
.r
O
O
I.
O
O
r r
O
O
( r
I-,
~
i.‘
i‘
F-,
I-,
es
f-,
A
Di
NF-,
N
!TD
IL,-,
F-,
co
N
F-,
F..
N
F-,
=
H-,
CDD
F-,
F.
Di
f
Fa
0,
I-O
N
O
IO
O
O
IO
O
O
t0
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
Ul
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OZfD
O
O
I-,
000(5
O
O
O
O
111
III
1I!i
111
1
•
•
• •
IIS
31f1133H3S )I1IOM - Z -D 1181HX3
133FO2ld 1IV I1 1A11OHSIH3
RODRIGUEZ TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT D
Fee Schedule
Attached Behind This Page
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT D
Fee Schedule
LAtivN cu* i S:
DIRECT
LABUR
OVERHEAD
144.007.
TOTAL
LABOR+UVHD
FIXED FEE
11.UU%
TOTAL
OUST
F.C. 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES
$ •
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
F.C. 120 ENVIRON. STUDIES & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
$ -
$
$ -
$
$ -
F.C.130 ROW AND UTILITY COORDINATION
$ 4,578.00
$ 6,592.32
S 11,170.32
$ 1,228.74
$ 12,399.06
F.C. 180 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ •
$ -
F.C.160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS
$ 4,351.00
$ 6.265.44
$ 10,616.44
$ 1,167.81
3 11,784.25
F.C. 161 DRAINAGE
$ 9,207.00
$ 13,258.08
$ 22,465.08
$ 2,471.16
$ 24,936.24
F.C. 162 SIGNING. MARKINGS, AND SIGNALIZATION
$ 88.50
$ 127.44
$ 215.94
S 23.75
$ 239.69
F.C. 163 MISCELLANEOUS (ROADWAY)
$ 2,544.50
5 3,664.08
$ 6,208.58
$ 682.94
S 6,891.52
F.C. 170 BRIDGE DESIGN
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
F.C. 190 PROJECT MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION
5 4,124.00
5 5,938.66
5 10,082.56
5 1,106.88
5 11,169.44
TOTALS
$ 24,893.00
$ 35,845.92
$ 60.738.92
$ 6,681.28
$ 67,420.20
DIRECT COSTS:
EXPENSES:
UNIT
RATE
QUANTITY
TOTAL
Final Ortho -photography Plots
SF
S -
$ •
Reproduction
SF
$ -
$ -
Mleage
Mite
$
$ -
Aldine Flights
EA
$ -
$ -
Per Dlem
Day
$ -
$ -
Mali & Deliveries
EA
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
5 -
TOTAL EXPENSES
$ -
SUB -CONTRACTS:
TASK
TOTAL
McGray & McGray
ROW Maps & Design Surveys
$ 25,910.00
K Hese & Assodates
Culvert Layout, Hydraulics & LOMR
$ 26,137.88
Woodruff Geologic Consulting
Geologic Assessment
$ 1,500.00
TOTAL SUB -CONTRACTS
$ 53,547.88
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$ 53,547.88
TOTAL COST
1 $ 120,968.08
PROJECT INFORMATION
Chisholm Trait/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
RATES
senior tngineer t4
rroject manager t,s
rroject tngineer tz
uesign tngineer t1
Engineering Specialist 11 ES2
mentor tngineenng i ecnnictan 5t 1
tngineenng i ecnnician t 1
4) ots.UU
4) 04.uu
t 4Z.uu
4) dn.uu
$ 41.00
4) 34.0u
4) dz.Uu
hour
hour
riour
flour
Hour
flour
flour
Final Ortho -photography Plots
Reproduction
Mileage
Airline Flights
Per Diem
Mail & Deliveries
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
SF
SF
Mile
EA
Day
EA
Overhead Rate
Profit
144.00%
11.00%
PROJECT DETAILS
Project Duration
rroject engin
Railroad Crossings
Bridges
Channels (Requiring Sections)
Bridge Class Culverts
Other Culverts
Retention/ Detention Ponds
Traffic Signals
Overhead Sign Bridges (OSB)
Cantilever Overhead Signs (COSS)
Large Signs
ROW Parcels
Agency / Commitee meetings
Public Meetings
Public Hearings
Environmental Documents: Cat Ex
EA
EIS
6
1.-z ft]
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Month
Mi
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Rnrlrirl,1A7 Transnnriafion Grouo. Inc
RTG SHEET COUNT
Chisholm Trail/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
F.C. 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS
Scale No Hrs / Ea
Notes
i lee sheet 1 2.0
Sheet Index 1 2.0
Project Layout 200 1 2.0
Typical Sections 20 2 3.0
Horizontal & Vertical Control Data Sheet 0 4.0
Horizontal Alignment Data Sheets 0 5.0
Plan / Profile Sheets 50 3 6.0
Intersection Details/Driveway Details 20 2 6.0
Miscellaneous Roadway Details 1 27.0
Removal Plans 100 0 10.0
Tree Protection Plan/Miscellaneous Details 20 0 25.0
Design Cross Sections 1 30.0
E&Q Sheets and Roadway Summaries 1 4.0
Standards' 0 2.0
Driveway Revisions (5 driveways)
Offsite Grading Detail & Fencing Layout Revision
FC 160 Total
13 7.92
F.C. 181 DRAINAGE
Scale No His ! Ea
Notes
Urn -Site Drainage Area Maps 200 2 4.0
Interior Drainage Area Maps 50 3 6.0
Runoff and Inlet Computations 1 4.0
Storm Sewer Computations 4 5.0
Storm Drain Plan & Profile 100 3 12.0
Storm Drain Lateral Profiles 2 10.0
Misc Drainage Details 0 20.0
Bridge Hydraulics 0 150.0
Water Pollution Abatement Plan 0 80.0
SW3P Tttie Sheet 0 10,0
SW3P Plan Sheets 100 3 8.0
Misc. Erosion Control Plan Sheet 0 3.0
BMP Design/Water Quality Pond Layouts 1 80.0
FEMA Floodplain Evaluation and CLOMR 0 160.0
Intel and Manhole and Erosion Control Summary 3 6.0
Water Quatity Pond Summary 1 4.0
Standards 02.0
Water Quality Pond/Stormceptor Revision
FC 161 Tota(
23 9.83
F.C. 162 SIGNING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNALIZATION
Scale No Hrs / Ea
Notes
Signing & Pavement Making Layout 1W 1 1u
Signing & Pavement Marfdng Layout (Existing Roadway) 0 8.0
Existing Sign Removal Layouts 0 0.0
Large Sign Details 0 15.0
Small Sign Details 0 15.0
Overhead Sign Support Details (Tabular) 0 0.0
Overhead Sign Elevations 0 20.0
Signal Layouts and Details 0 0.0
Pavement Marking Summary 0 15.0
Small Sign Summaries 0 15.0
Large Sign Summaries 0 9.0
Standards 0 2.0
FC 162 Total
1 2.00
F.C. 163 MISCELLANEOUS (ROADWAY)
Scale No Firs / Ea
1 cP Narrative Sequence of.consiructron 1 :1.0
TCP Typical Sections 0 15.0
TCP Horizontal Alignment Data 0 10.0
Traffic Control Plan (3 Phases) 100 1 2.0
TCP Road Closure Detour Layout 0 15.0
Safety Review Meeting 0 20.0
Retaining Wail Boring Logs/Legends 0 10.0
Retaining Wall Horizontal Alignment Data 0 5.0
Retaining Wall Typical Sections 1 4.0
Retaining Wall Layouts 40 4 8.0
!Rumination Layouts 50 2 6.0
TCP and Retaining Wail Summaries 2 2.0
Utility Layouts 50 0 15.0
Standards 0 2.0
Notes
Revision to the TCP (Overall) Layout
Illumination Layout & Electrical Service Data Sheet
FC 163 Total
11 5.18
F.C. 170 BRIDGE DESIGN
Scale No Hrs / Ea
Notes
Hedge Layouts u 0.0
Bridge Details 0 0.0
Bridge Summaries 0 0.0
Standards' 0 0.0
FC 170 Total
0 0.00
'Standards not Included In sheet totals
PLAN SET TOTAL
48 8.08
RTG MANHOUR ESTIMATE
Sheet 1 of 2
Chisholm Trail/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
. � • - • r . I . V 1 , . f r . 1. • '
54
E3
E2
51
S2
ET
ET
0 a
rrolect meetings tesumatea Ca: 4 mBnrIgsf
1,Z
iz.0
Project Management (extended duration = 6 months)
24
10.0
24.0
QA/QC (Phase 2)
10
40
50.0
ROW Coordination
20.0
20.0
0.0
•' o a
0
46
0
0
40
0
0�
86.0
F.C. 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN -STUDIES
E4
E3
E2
51
ES2
SET
ET
- Total
Utility Meetings (max. of 6)
12.0
u.0
Utility Coordination (Misc.)
10.0
10.0
0.0
Utility Conflict Identification
20.0
0.0
ROW Coordination
20.0
20.0
0.0
Prepare Punch List
0,0
Prepare "As -Built" Plan Set
0.0
FC 120 Total
0
62
0
0
30
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 110 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 102 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IT 0•1 Ili . •i_ TT* ' } 1
54
E3
2
El
E
SET
ET
oa
Utility Meetings (max. of 6)
12.0
0.0
Utility Coordination (Misc.)
10.0
10.0
0.0
Utility Conflict Identification
20.0
0.0
ROW Coordination
20.0
20.0
0.0
Prepare Punch List
0.0
Prepare "As -Built" Plan Set
0.0
FC 120 Total
0
62
0
0
30
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
FC 110 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F.C. 130 ROW AND UTILITY COORDINATION
E4
53
E2
El
582
SET
ET
Total
Utility Meetings (max. of 6)
12.0
12.0
Utility Coordination (Misc.)
10.0
10.0
20.0
Utility Conflict Identification
20.0
20.0
ROW Coordination
20.0
20.0
40.0
Prepare Punch List
0.0
Prepare "As -Built" Plan Set
0.0
FC 120 Total
0
62
0
0
30
0
0
92
F.C. 180 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
54
53
E2
51
ES2
SET
ET
Total
Coordinate and Attend Pre -Construction Conference
0.0
Site Visits (Assume 12 Month Construction Duration)
0.0
Review and Approve Shop Drawings, Etc.
0.0
Review Application for Payment
0.0
Prepare Punch List
0.0
Prepare "As -Built" Plan Set
0.0
FC 351 Total
0
0
0
0
tr.
0
0
0
RTG MANHOUR ESTIMATE
Sheet 2 of 2
Chisholm TraII/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
KM ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS
E4
t3
E2
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
Title Sheet
0.0
1.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
2.0
Sheet index
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1,0
0.0
2.0
Project Layout
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
Typical Sections
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
6.0
Horizontal & Vertical Control Data Sheet
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Horizontal Alignment Data Sheets
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Plan / Profile Sheets
0.0
8.0
0,0
6.0
0.0
8.0
0.0
18.0
Intersection Details/Driveway Detags
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
8.0
2.0
0.0
12.0
Miscellaneous Roadway DetaOs
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
18.0
4.0
0.0
27.0
Removal Plans
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Tree Protection Plan/Miscellaneous Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Design Cross Sections
0.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
24.0
0.0
0.0
30.0
E&Q Sheets and Roadway Summaries
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
4.0
Standards'
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 160 Total
9
23
2
6
65
22
0
103.0
F.C. 161 DRAINAGE
E4
E3
E2
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
Off -Site Drainage Area Maps
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
8.0
Interior Drainage Area Maps
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
18.0
Runoff and Inlet Computations
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
Storm Sewer Computations
0.0
0.0
16.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
20.0
Storm Drain Plan & Profile
0.0
2.0
24.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
36.0
Storm Drain Lateral Profiles
0.0
0.0
16.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
20.0
Misc Drainage Detags
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bridge Hydraulics
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Water Pollution Abatement Plan
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SW3P Title Sheet
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SW3P Plan Sheets
0.0
2.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
18.0
Misc. Erosion Control Plan Sheet
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
BMP Design/Water Quality Pond Layouts
0.0
4.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
16.0
0.0
80.0
FEMA Floodplain Evaluation end CLOMR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Inlet and Manhole and Erosion Control Summary
0.0
2.0
10.0
0.0
0,0
6.0
0.0
18.0
Water Quality Pond Summary
0.0
0.0
4,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
Standards
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 161 Total
0
10
162
0
0
54
0
226.0
F.C.162 SIGNIf1 , MARKINGS, AND SIGNALIZATION
I E4
E3
E2
El
ES1
SET
ET
Total
Signing & Pavement Marking Layout
O o 0 0 o o 0 o o o o o
000000000000
. 1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
Signing & Pavement Marking Layout (Existing Roadwa!
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Existing Sign Removal Layouts
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Large Sign Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Smaf Sign Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Overhead Sign Support Details (Tabular)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Overhead Sign Elevations
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Signal Layouts and Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pavement Marking Summary
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Small Sign Summaries
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
Large Sign Summaries
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Standards
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 162 Total
0.
1
0
0
0
1
0
2.0-
F.C. 163 MISMLLANEOUS (ROADWAY)
E4
E3
E2
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
TCP Narrative Sequence of Construction
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
TCP Typical Sections
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TCP Horizontal Alignment Data
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Traffic Control Plan (3 Phases)
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
TCP Road Closure Detour Layout
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Safety Review Meeting
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Retaining WaR Boring Logs/Legends
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Retaining Wall Horizontal Alignment Data
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Retaining Wail Typical Sections
0.0
2.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
2.0
0.0
4.0
Retaining Wag Layouts
0.0
16.0
0.0
0.0
8.0
8.0
0.0
32,0
Illumination Layouts
0.0
4.8
0.0
3.2
0.0
2.0
2.0
12.0
TCP and Retaining Wall Summaries
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
4.0
Utility Layouts
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FC 163 Total
0
27
6-
3
8
17
2
57.0
F.C. 179 BRIDGE DESIGN
E4
E3
E2
El
ES2
SET
ET
Total
Bridge Layouts
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bridge Details
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bridge Summaries
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Standards"
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
rc 176'otal
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
RTG MANHOUR SUMMARY
Sheet 1 of 2
Chisholm Trail/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
F.C. 190 PROJECT MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION Manhours Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer 0 $58.00 $
Project Manager 46 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist II 40 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
2,484.00
1,640.00
Sub -total 86 $ 4,124.00
F.C. 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES
Manhours
Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer U $58.00
Project Manager 0 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist II 0 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
Sub -total
0 $
F.C. 120 ENVIRON. STUDIES & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Manhours Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer 0 $58.00 $
Project Manager 0 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist II 0 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
Sub -total 0
F.C. 130 ROW AND UTILITY COORDINATION
F.C. 180
Senior Engineer
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Engineering Specialist II
Senior Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
Manhours
Rate Direct Labor
0 $58.00 $
62 $54.00 $
0 $42.00 $
0 $36.00 $
30 $41.00 $
0 $34.50 $
0 $32.00 $
3,348.00
1,230.00
Sub -total
CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
92
Manhours
Rate
4,578.00
Direct Labor
enior ngineer
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Engineering Specialist II
Senior Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
0
0
0
0
0
0
$54.00
$42.00
$36.00
$41.00
$34.50
$32.00
Sub -total
0
F.C. 160
RTG MANHOUR SUMMARY
Sheet 2 of 2
Chisholm Trail/Chisholm Parkway
City of Round Rock
ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS
Manhours
Rate
Direct Labor
enior
ngineer
Project Manager
Protect Engineer
Design Engineer
Engineering Specialist II
Senior Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
F.C. 161 DRAINAGE
Sub -total
Senior Engineer
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Engineering Specialist II
Senior Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
23
2
6
50
22
0
II
$54.00
$42.00
$36.00
$41.00
$34.50
$32.00
1,242.00
84.00
216.00
2,050.00
759.00
103
Manhours
$ 4,351.00
Rate Direct Labor
0 $58.00
10 $54.00 $
162 $42.00 $
0 $36.00 $
0 $41.00 $
54 $34.50 $
0 $32.00 $
540.00
6,804.00
1,863.00
Sub -total
F.C. 162 SiGNING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNALIZATION
F.C. 163
enior Engineer
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Engineering Specialist iI
Senior Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
226
Manhours
Rate
9,207.00
Direct Labor
Sub -total
MISCELLANEOUS (ROADWAY)
en or ngineer
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Engineering Specialist 11
Senior Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
F.C. 170 BRIDGE DESIGN
Sub -total
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
$58.00 0
$54.00
$42.00
$36.00
$41.00
$34.50
$32.00
$
$
54.00
34.50
Manhours
Rate
Direct Labor
88.50
27
0
3
8
17
2
$54.00
$42.00
$36.00
$41.00
$34.50
$32.00
1,458.00
108.00
328.00
586.50
64.00
57
Manhours
$ 2,544.50
Rate Direct Labor
Senior Engineer 0 $58.00 $
Project Manager 0 $54.00 $
Project Engineer 0 $42.00 $
Design Engineer 0 $36.00 $
Engineering Specialist 11 0 $41.00 $
Senior Engineering Technician 0 $34.50 $
Engineering Technician 0 $32.00 $
Sub -total 0
69
8
0
8
» E9
CA
69
N
a
eal
8 8
N
0)
co
0
0
IN
M
co
0
O
8
69
0f
co
M
1
ut
fn
O
cV
V)
3
tV
to
69
tet
O
.0
Ea
CO
8
(V
69
et
8
n1
4,
OD
2
69
0
Eft
F
8
8
4,
0
r
49
co
8
69
8
(V
4,
N
iso
4,
oo
19
f0
0
CM
en
O
M
4,
N
N
E
5
M
Q