R-10-12-16-10D1 - 12/16/2010RESOLUTION NO. R -10-12-16-10D1
WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, V.T.C.A., authorizes local
governments and agencies of the state to enter into agreements with one another to perform
governmental functions and services, and
WHEREAS, the City of Round Rock wishes to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the
City of Georgetown, Chisholm Trail Special Utility District, and Brushy Creek Municipal Utility
District regarding review of Brazos River Authority's system water rates, Now Therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS,
That the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City an Interlocal
Agreement with the City of Georgetown, Chisholm Trail Special Utility District, and Brushy Creek
Municipal Utility District, a copy of same being attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated
herein for all purposes.
The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and
subject of the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted was posted and that such meeting was
open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Resolution and the subject matter
hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act,
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended.
RESOLVED this 16th day of December, 2010.
)11
ALAN MCGRAW, Mayor
City of Round Rock, Texas
ATTEST:
SARA L. WHITE, City Secretary
O:\wdox\SCClnts\0112\ 1005\MUNICIPAL\00209241. DOC/nnc
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING
REVIEW OF SYSTEM WATER RATES
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
EXHIBIT
„A„
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING REVIEW OF SYSTEM
WATER RATES ("Agreement") is entered into between the City of Round Rock, Texas, a
Texas home -rule city ("Round Rock"); the City of Georgetown, Texas, a Texas home -rule city
("Georgetown"), Chisholm Trail Special Utility District, a Texas conservation and reclamation
District ("CTSUD"), and Brushy Creek Municipal Utility District, a Texas conservation and
reclamation district ("BCMUD"). In this Agreement, Round Rock, Georgetown, CTSUD and
BCMUD are sometimes individually referred to as "a Party" and collectively referred to as "the
Parties".
Recitals
WHEREAS, each of the Parties have entered into water supply agreements ("System
Water Availability Agreements") with the Brazos River Authority .( "BRA") setting forth the
terms and conditions pursuant to which BRA has agreed to make available to each of the Parties
a supply of water from the BRA "System", as such term is defined in each of the System Water
Availability Agreements;
WHEREAS, BRA has implemented a System -wide pricing methodology for the
availability of water under the System Water Availability Agreements, and each of the Parties
pays a "System Rate" to BRA for the availability of a water supply, regardless of whether, and
how much, water is diverted by each of the Parties;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has increased the System Rate each year since the
Parties entered into their respective System Water Availability Agreements with BRA, and each
of the Customers desires to ensure that the System Rates charged by BRA are just and
reasonable; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to retain a consultant to review the System Rate in order
to review the methodology used for calculation of the System Rate and to confirm that the
System Rate is just and reasonable, and consistent with standard industry ratemaking principles.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual
promises and agreements of the Parties contained in this Agreement, the Parties agree as follows:
I.
EVALUATION OF SYSTEM RATE
1.01 Rate Consultant. Within thirty (30) days of approval of this Agreement by all of
the Parties, Georgetown will enter into the agreement with HDR, Inc. ("HDR") which is attached
as Exhibit "A" ("HDR Proposal"), for the evaluation of the System Rate (the "Rate
Evaluation Study"). The scope of the HDR Proposal shall not be amended by Georgetown or
any other Party without the prior written consent of all Parties to this Agreement.
1.02 Cost of Services. Georgetown will advance and pay the cost of the Rate
Evaluation Study, subject to its right to reimbursement by each of the other Parties for a portion
of such cost based on the cost allocation percentages set forth on the attached Exhibit "B",
which are based on percentage of System water available to that Party under the System Water
Availability Agreements (the "Cost Allocation Percentages").
1.03 Effect of Partial Execution. This Agreement will become effective and binding
on a Party when executed by all Parties. If less than all of the Parties have executed this
Agreement as of , 2010, then this Agreement shall be null and void for all
purposes, regardless of how many Parties have executed this Agreement as of said date.
1.04 Reimbursement of Costs. Upon Georgetown's approval of each invoice for the
Rate Evaluation Study, Georgetown will transmit a copy of the invoice to the other Parties. Each
of the other Parties agree to pay its prorata portion of each invoice, which will be determined by
multiplying its respective Cost Allocation Percentage by the total amount of the approved
invoice, to Georgetown within 30 days after delivery of the invoice (the "Due Date"). Each
invoice submitted by Georgetown for reimbursement will reference the HDR Proposal and
clearly describe the work done in connection with the Alternate Design Work, and will not seek
reimbursement or payment for any work other than the Rate Evaluation Study. Any amounts due
to Georgetown which are not paid within 30 days of delivery will accrue interest at the rate of
7% per annum from the Due Date until paid.
1.05 Work Product. Upon receipt of a request from another Party, Georgetown
agrees to promptly make available to the requesting Party copies of any work product produced
by HDR in connection with the Rate Evaluation Study. The Party requesting a copy of such
information shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by Georgetown in preparing and furnishing
the copies.
II.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
2.01 Authority. This Agreement is made in part under the authority conferred in
Chapter 791, Texas Government Code.
2.02 Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable and, if any
provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid for any reason by a court or agency of
competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement will not be affected and this Agreement
will be construed as if the invalid portion had never been contained herein.
2.03 Payments from Current Revenues. Any payments required to be made by a
Party under this Agreement will be paid from current revenues or other funds lawfully available
to the Party for such purpose.
2
2.04 Cooperation. The Parties agree to cooperate at all times in good faith to
effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement.
2.05 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties
regarding the sharing of costs for the Rate Evaluation Study and supersedes all prior or
contemporaneous understandings or representations, whether oral or written, regarding the
subject matter. The Parties confirm that this Agreement relates only to the Rate Evaluation
Study.
2.06 Amendments. Any amendment of this Agreement must be in writing and will be
effective if signed by the authorized representatives of the Parties.
2.07 Applicable Law; Venue. This Agreement will be construed in accordance with
Texas law. Venue for any action arising hereunder will be in Williamson County, Texas.
2.08 Notices. Any notices given under this Agreement will be effective if (i)
forwarded to a Party by hand -delivery; (ii) transmitted to a Party by confirmed telecopy; or (iii)
deposited with the U.S. Postal Service, postage prepaid, certified, to the address of the Party
indicated below:
GEORGETOWN:
ROUND ROCK:
3
Georgetown, Texas
Attn: Jim Briggs
Telephone: (512)
Facsimile: (512)
Email:
221 East Main
Round Rock, Texas 78664
Attn: City Manager
Telephone: (512) 218-5410
Facsimile:(512) 218-7097
Email: swhite@round-rock.tx.us
BCMUD:
CTSUD:
16318 Great Oaks Drive
Round Rock, Texas 78681
Attn: Tom Clark
Telephone: (512) 255-7871
Facsimile: (512) 255-0332
Email: t.clark@bcmud.org
851 FM 970
Florence, Texas 76527
Attn: Jennifer McKnight
Telephone: (254)793-3103
Facsimile: (254)793-3100
Email: jennifermcknight@ctsud.org
2.09 Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated
herein by reference:
Exhibit A -
Exhibit B -
HDR Proposal
Cost Allocation Percentages
2.10 Counterparts; Effect of Partial Execution. This Agreement may be executed
simultaneously in multiple counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of
which will constitute the same instrument.
2.11 Authority. Each Party represents and warrants that it has the full right, power
and authority to execute this Agreement.
4
ATTEST: CITY OF ROUND ROCK:
By:
Sara White, City Secretary Alan McGraw
Date:
5
ATTEST:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
By:
Printed Name: r e (� , Czwvve.c.
Title: Na.
Date:
6
1t) 2.9- aotc7
BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT:
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
Date:
CHISHOLM TRAIL SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT:
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
Date:
8
EXHIBIT "A"
HDR PROPOSAL
EXHIBIT "B"
COST ALL OCATION PERCENTAGES
Georgetown: 43.325%
Round Rock: 30.925%
BCMUD: 6.825%
CTSUD: 18.925%
ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY
City Council Agenda Summary Sheet
Agenda Item No. 10D1.
Agenda Caption:
Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement
Regarding Review of System Water Rates with the City of Georgetown, Chisholm Trail
Special Utility District, and Brushy Creek Municipal Utility District.
Meeting Date: December 16, 2010
Department: Infrastructure Development and Construction Management
Staff Person making presentation: Michael Thane, P.E.
Director of Infrastructure Management.
Item Summary:
The City of Round Rock, City of Georgetown, Brushy Creek MUD, and Chisholm Trail SUD (Parties) have all entered
into water supply agreements with the Brazos River Authority (BRA). The BRA has implemented a System -wide
pricing methodology for the availability of water. The BRA has increased the System Rate each year since the Parties
entered into their respective water supply agreements with the BRA, and the Parties desire to ensure that the
System Rate charged by the BRA is just and reasonable. The Parties desire to retain HDR, Inc. to review the
methodology used for calculation of the System Rate and to confirm that the System Rate is consistent with
standard industry ratemaking principles.
Upon execution of this agreement by all Parties, the City of Georgetown will enter into an agreement HDR, Inc. for
the evaluation of the System Rate. The cost for the services will be allocated to the Parties based on their ownership
capacity in the Williamson County Regional Raw Water System (WCRRWS), which includes the intake at Lake
Stillhouse Hollow and the raw water line from Lake Stillhouse Hollow to Lake Georgetown. Round Rock's percentage
in the WCRRWS is 30.925%.
Strategic Plan Relevance:
Goal 27.0 "Ensure there is an adequate, affordable and safe water supply."
Cost: $12,370 (30.925% of $40,000 contract with HDR)
Source of Funds:
Date of Public Hearing (if required): N/A
Recommended Action: Approval
EXECUTED
DOCUMENT
FOLLOWS
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING
REVIEW OF SYSTEM WATER RATES
THE STATE OF TEXAS
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING REVIEW OF SYSTEM
WATER RATES ("Agreement") is entered into between the City of Round Rock, Texas, a
Texas home -rule city ("Round Rock"); the City of Georgetown, Texas, a Texas home -rule city
("Georgetown"), Chisholm Trail Special Utility District, a Texas conservation and reclamation
District ("CTSUD"), and Brushy Creek Municipal Utility District, a Texas conservation and
reclamation district ("BCMUD"). In this Agreement, Round Rock, Georgetown, CTSUD and
BCMUD are sometimes individually referred to as "a Party" and collectively referred to as "the
Parties".
Recitals
WHEREAS, each of the Parties have entered into water supply agreements ("System
Water Availability Agreements") with the Brazos River Authority ( "BRA") setting forth the
terms and conditions pursuant to which BRA has agreed to make available to each of the Parties
a supply of water from the BRA "System", as such term is defined in each of the System Water
Availability Agreements;
WHEREAS, BRA has implemented a System -wide pricing methodology for the
availability of water under the System Water Availability Agreements, and each of the Parties
pays a "System Rate" to BRA for the availability of a water supply, regardless of whether, and
how much, water is diverted by each of the Parties;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has increased the System Rate each year since the
Parties entered into their respective System Water Availability Agreements with BRA, and each
of the Customers desires to ensure that the System Rates charged by BRA are just and
reasonable; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to retain a consultant to review the System Rate in order
to review the methodology used for calculation of the System Rate and to confirm that the
System Rate is just and reasonable, and consistent with standard industry ratemaking principles.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual
promises and agreements of the Parties contained in this Agreement, the Parties agree as follows:
I.
EVALUATION OF SYSTEM RATE
1.01 Rate Consultant. Within thirty (30) days of approval of this Agreement by all of
the Parties, Georgetown will enter into the agreement with HDR, Inc. ("HDR") which is attached
foto 1
as Exhibit "A" ("HDR Proposal"), for the evaluation of the System Rate (the "Rate
Evaluation Study"). The scope of the HDR Proposal shall not be amended by Georgetown or
any other Party without the prior written consent of all Parties to this Agreement.
1.02 Cost of Services. Georgetown will advance and pay the cost of the Rate
Evaluation Study, subject to its right to reimbursement by each of the other Parties for a portion
of such cost based on the cost allocation percentages set forth on the attached Exhibit "B",
which are based on percentage of System water available to that Party under the System Water
Availability Agreements (the "Cost Allocation Percentages").
1.03 Effect of Partial Execution. This Agreement will become effective and binding
on a Party when executed by all Parties. If less than all of the Parties have executed this
Agreement as of , 2010, then this Agreement shall be null and void for all
purposes, regardless of how many Parties have executed this Agreement as of said date.
1.04 Reimbursement of Costs. Upon Georgetown's approval of each invoice for the
Rate Evaluation Study, Georgetown will transmit a copy of the invoice to the other Parties. Each
of the other Parties agree to pay its prorata portion of each invoice, which will be determined by
multiplying its respective Cost Allocation Percentage by the total amount of the approved
invoice, to Georgetown within 30 days after delivery of the invoice (the "Due Date"). Each
invoice submitted by Georgetown for reimbursement will reference the HDR Proposal and
clearly describe the work done in connection with the Alternate Design Work, and will not seek
reimbursement or payment for any work other than the Rate Evaluation Study. Any amounts due
to Georgetown which are not paid within 30 days of delivery will accrue interest at the rate of
7% per annum from the Due Date until paid.
1.05 Work Product. Upon receipt of a request from another Party, Georgetown
agrees to promptly make available to the requesting Party copies of any work product produced
by HDR in connection with the Rate Evaluation Study. The Party requesting a copy of such
information shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by Georgetown in preparing and furnishing
the copies.
II.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
2.01 Authority. This Agreement is made in part under the authority conferred in
Chapter 791, Texas Government Code.
2.02 Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable and, if any
provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid for any reason by a court or agency of
competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement will not be affected and this Agreement
will be construed as if the invalid portion had never been contained herein.
2.03 Payments from Current Revenues. Any payments required to be made by a
Party under this Agreement will be paid from current revenues or other funds lawfully available
to the Party for such purpose.
2
2.04 Cooperation. The Parties agree to cooperate at all times in good faith to
effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement.
2.05 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties
regarding the sharing of costs for the Rate Evaluation Study and supersedes all prior or
contemporaneous understandings or representations, whether oral or written, regarding the
subject matter. The Parties confirm that this Agreement relates only to the Rate Evaluation
Study.
2.06 Amendments. Any amendment of this Agreement must be in writing and will be
effective if signed by the authorized representatives of the Parties.
2.07 Applicable Law; Venue. This Agreement will be construed in accordance with
Texas law. Venue for any action arising hereunder will be in Williamson County, Texas.
2.08 Notices. Any notices given under this Agreement will be effective if (i)
forwarded to a Party by hand -delivery; (ii) transmitted to a Party by confirmed telecopy; or (iii)
deposited with the U.S. Postal Service, postage prepaid, certified, to the address of the Party
indicated below:
GEORGETOWN:
ROUND ROCK:
3
Georgetown, Texas
Attn: Jim Briggs
Telephone: (512) 9.30 -'Jss9
Facsimile: (512) q3t--3tPaa.
Email:
221 East Main
Round Rock, Texas 78664
Attn: City Manager
Telephone: (512) 218-5410
Facsimile:(512) 218-7097
Email: swhite@round-rock.tx.us
BCMUD:
CTSUD:
16318 Great Oaks Drive
Round Rock, Texas 78681
Attn: Tom-£fark Ce t- • 1163(t--.
Telephone: (512) 255-7871
Facsimile: (512) 255-0332
Email: t.clark(bcmud.org
851 FM 970
Florence, Texas 76527
Attn: Jennifer McKnight
Telephone: (254)793-3103
Facsimile: (254)793-3100
Email: jennifermcknight@ctsud.org
2.09 Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated
herein by reference:
Exhibit A - HDR Proposal
Exhibit B - Cost Allocation Percentages
2.10 Counterparts; Effect of Partial Execution. This Agreement may be executed
simultaneously in multiple counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of
which will constitute the same instrument.
2.11 Authority. Each Party represents and warrants that it has the full right, power
and authority to execute this Agreement.
4
ATTEST: CITY OF ROUND ROCK:
fi/144/1,-. 14iZett.
Sara White, City Secretary
By:
Alan McGraw Mitti-y-
Date: (2 • lb • tU
5
ATTEST:
CITY OF G ORGETOWN:
By:
Printed Name: "6tf r Cs - CrO.- -�
Title: M y p
Date: / 201 0
6
BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT:
By:
Printe
Title:
ame. o GRA -I L -
3b44 es de �
Date: �- ' 16
7
CHISHOLM TRAIL SPECI4L UTILITY DISTRICT:
By: ,'
Pried N
Title: • S
Date:
8
/01/4///o
EXHIBIT "A"
HDR PROPOSAL
Project Name: Review of BRA Raw Water System Rate
Engineering Firm Name: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Task Order No. HDR -10-04
Date: 10/5/10
City's Designated Representative — Jim Briggs, ACM
City of Georgetown
P.O. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78627
General Description of Services or Project:
Detailed Review and Coordination/Negotiation Support Concerning BRA Raw Water System Rate
City Provided Information or Work: The City shall provide the following services or perform
the following work (describe):
City of Georgetown Project No:
General Ledger Account Number:
The City of Georgetown (City) will request various materials from the Brazos River Authority
(BRA) for review by HDR, including material related to the BRA Long range Plan, associated
spreadsheet and backup information, any accompanying reports, memoes, or other support
information that has not yet been previously provided.
The City will also take the lead in arranging, managing, and coordinating an Interlocal Agreement
among any other participating entities, as well as arranging coordination with BRA. The City of
Georgetown will serve as the contract manager on this effort, and HDR will bill Georgetown for all
efforts incurred within its scope, and Georgeotwn will be responsible for the pro -rating HDR's
billing to the other participating entities and for collections of billing. The City of Georgetown
shall be responsible for coordinating and developing consensus positions among the participants
and providing unified direction to HDR as to how to proceed as the coordination/neogtiation
efforts progress.
Any documents or information related to the Work/Services provided by the City to the
Professional, including, without limitation, engineering studies, maps, reports, filed data, notes,
plans, diagrams, sketches, or maps (the "Information") is and shall remain the property of the City,
and Professional shall have no ownership or other interest in same. The Professional shall deliver
to the City, if requested, a written itemized receipt for the Information, and shall be responsible for
its safe keeping and shall return it to the City, upon request, in as good condition as when received,
normal wear and tear excepted.
Scope of Work: (describe in detail using additional or separate sheets if necessary):
Master Services Agreement — Task Order #HDR -10-001
Version 8.28.2009
Page 1
DATA GATHERING
HDR has already performed an initial review of the BRA Long Range Financial Plan and related
spreadsheet and has developed a series of questions as to assumptions, methodology, and policies
underlygin the Plan. As a part of the subsequent efforts outlined in this scope, HDR will
participate in a City of Georgetown/BRA coordination meeting where BRA will present and
explain their Plan and answer questions. With information arising from this meeting and/or
subsequent data transmittals, HDR may revise its comments on the Plan. There may also be
additional information reuirements that become identified subsequent to the BRA coordination
meeting that will be coordinated through the City of Georgetown.
RATE MODEL REVIEW
It should be understood that developing utility rates is both "an art and a science." There are
industry -accepted methodologies (AWWA-M1) and broad statutory provisions (TCEQ Chapter
291 rules) regarding wholesale water rates. Even within these guidelines and regulatory
provisions, there is still room for latitude. Utilities are allowed some flexibility in how they
organize, fund themselves, define rate classes and implement certain rate designs. Specific policies
may also govern some aspects of rate design that is unique to each utility. Rates are typically
evaluated against certain regulatory criteria with general legal considerations of being fair,
equitable, and non-discriminatory. In other words, rates should not vary to far from a reasonable
cost -of -service basis. Additional regulatory latitude is also given in cost of service and equity
considerations for "system rates" and rates agreed to under contract.
BRA's Plan is based on a series of assumtions, methodologies, and policies. These underlying
factors may or may not represent good planning or the alternative perspectives of its wholesale
customers. HDR will provide its assessment of the BRA's Long Range Financial Plan and
underlying spreadsheet model with respct to its compliance with industry standards, Texas
regulatory guidelines, and good planning. HDR will identify, in its opinion, viable parts of the
Plan, portions of the Plan with issues, possible rate mitigation measures, and negotiation strategies
that would help address any shortcomings of the Plan. If requested by the City of Georgetown,
HDR, in coordination with the participating entities, will develop an alternative "most likely"
future scenario for the system rate that could serve as the basis for further coordination and
negotiation. There could be a number of rounds of revisions to the forecasting model, as alternative
scenarios are tested or negotiations iterate towards agreed-upon methods or assumed values.
COORDINATION
A more noticeable amount of coordination effort will be required in this second phase of the rate
review/negotiation effort. Five coordination meetings with BRA are budgeted to provide for the
presentation of the Plan and Q/A session, a subsuquent meeting with BRA for presenting and
discussing the participating entities comments on the Plan, a follow-up meeting with BRA to
discuss their response, and two later negotiation meetings to reach consensus on Plan changes.
Five coordination meetings are also budgeted for joint meetings of the staff of participating entities
to brief them on issues and status. Eight coordination meeting are budgeted for briefings of the
governing bodies in Executive Session, one for each of the particpating entities at the outset of this
Master Services Agreement — Task Order #HDR -10-001
Version 8.28.2009
Page 2
effort and a second round of briefings of the governing bodies as any negotiations are nearing
conclusion.
No effort is currently scope for any TCEQ coordination or action. Additional coordination
meetings can be provided on an additional per diem basis at the hourly rates shown in Exhibit B.
LEVEL OF EFFORT AND BUDGET
HDR proposes to conduct the second phase review and negotiation of the BRA system rate and
model for a fee of $40,000, proposed on a per diem basis. This budgeting includes the
development of summary information needed to coordinate with the participating entities and
BRA.
SCHEDULE
Upon Notice to Proceed, HDR would begin developing a series of questions about the Plan, based
on our prior initial review. The City of Georgetown will then arrange a meeting with BRA staff for
a presentation of the Plan and Q&A. HDR will then refine its comments on the Plan and meeting
with the participating entities to coordinate how to proceed. It is expected that this second phase
could take up to five or six months to reach a conclusion as to agreed-upon changes to the BRA
Plan and related policies and any significant matters remaining unsettled.
Statement Regarding Non -Collusion; Prohibited Financial Interests; Prohibited Political
Influences: (Per Article 36 in the Master Service Agreement): Professional hereby represents
and warrants to City that Professional shall not perform any work or services for a third party
that is potentially or actually related to, connected to, a part of, or integral to the work or
services that it has performed is or is performing for the City under this Task Order.
Professional shall have the affirmative duty to bring all such conflicts or potential conflicts to
the attention of the City, and Professional agrees that the City shall be the sole judge as to
whether a conflict or potential conflict of interest with work for private parties or Developer
work exists. If in the judgment of the City such a conflict or potential conflict between City
work and Developer work exists, then Professional agrees to terminate all work under the
affected Task Order(s) immediately and that it shall not be eligible for payment for such
services.
Compensation: (Pick one)
® Time and Materials with Amount Not to Exceed: - Services to be provided at rates shown on
Exhibit B in an amount not to exceed $40,000 DOLLARS and ZERO CENTS.
❑ Lump Sum: Services to be provided at rates shown on Exhibit B in an amount not to exceed
$ DOLLARS and ZERO CENTS.
Master Services Agreement — Task Order #HDR -10-001
Version 8.28.2009
Page 3
APPROVED:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
By:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Phone:
Fax:
E -Mail:
Date:
Jim Briggs
Assistant City Manager
POBox 409
Georgetown, TX 78627
512.930.3651
512.930.3659
jhb@georgetowntx.org
Master Services Agreement — Task Order #HDR -10-001
Version 8.28.2009
PROFESSIONAL
Firm Name:HDR Engineering, Inc.
By:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Phone:
Fax:
E -Mail:
Date:
Kelly Kaatz, P.E.
Sr. Vice President
4401 Westgate Blvd.
Austin, TX 78745
512.930.5134
512.912.5158
kelly.kaatz@hdrinc.com
Page 4
Person -Hours
A. LABOR EXPENSES
Total Hours
u
a)
U
c
(0
t
u
H
Sen. Financial
7.41
U
LO N O LO Ln O N
M CT V1 ei M 01 l0
N O LO 'Cr CO CO M
M 00 to 01
VI- V1 111 111 VI- v1 v1
O O O O O O
00 N ct O u1 0C) Cf r -I
N N N G N 01
0 0 0 0 0
O t0 O gcr
O 0 0 0 0 0
00 O N O U1 *Zr O
r -I N N G7
it
co
a1
=o
0
m
'`J= CT
ca c
� '` *
3 a) >
to cco
cLy -§. -3
.L Q c c c
C.1 a) • O O
s a a)
(0 W r0
0 0 •c c c c c
o c o v
;g .. a) a o 0 0
p Iz N EY U U u0
1 I I 1 1 1 1
vi N CO 'V 1.11 CO N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
ro CO CU CO CO CU Mt
I- I-- I- I'- I- I- -
O CO
Ln
o r,
Ln
v1
oN.
61 N
N
Total Labor Hours
N
N
00
1.11ai
m
CT
CT
N.
N
O • c
= d
a
CL) x
c- W
CI)
' 0
C
v �
Q J
X
w
0
m
J
0) 0
0
m
1-
B. NON -LABOR EXPENSES
v
O O N O N
l!1 O O N
00 e-1 N
t/1 V1 1./1 V1 i/1
0
C s
Cu
O Ln O Ln
U1 a-1 1, N
O
v1 v1 v1 v1 v1
h N
Z- (0 rti
ro
o v
t
i -i
Reproduction
CUa
a
oZ
To
0)
m
2
u
2
N
fA
EXHIBIT "B"
COST ALL OCATION PERCENTAGES
Georgetown: 43.325%
Round Rock: 30.925%
BCMUD: 6.825%
CTSUD: 18.925%