Loading...
R-2014-1397 - 5/8/2014RESOLUTION NO. R-2014-1397 WHEREAS, the City of Round Rock has previously entered into a Contract for Engineering Services ("Contract") with Halff Associates, Inc. for the RM 620 Safety Improvements Project — Design Phase, and WHEREAS, Halff Associates, Inc. has submitted Supplemental Contract No. 1 to the Contract to modify the provisions for the scope of services, and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to enter into said Supplemental Contract No. 1 with Halff Associates, Inc., Now Therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, That the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City Supplemental Contract No. 1 to the Contract with Halff Associates, Inc., a copy of same being attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes. The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted was posted and that such meeting was open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Resolution and the subject matter hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. RESOLVED this 8th day of May, 2014. ALAN MCGRAW, Mayor City of Round Rock, Texas ATTEST: 9yrytk ()Alit SARA L. WHITE, City Clerk 0112.1404. 00297719 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON EXHIBIT „A» SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FIRM: Halff Associates, Inc. ADDRESS: 4030 W. Braker Lane, Suite 450, Austin, TX 78759 ("Engineer") PROJECT: RM 620 Safety Improvements Protect -- Design Phase This Supplemental Contract No. 1 to Contract for Engineering Services is made by and between the City of Round Rock, Texas, hereinafter called the "City" and Halff Associates, Inc., hereinafter called the "Engineer". WHEREAS, the City and Engineer executed a Contract for Engineering Services, hereinafter called the "Contract", on the 27th day of June, 2013 for the RM 620 Safety hnprovements Project — Design Phase Project in the amount of $955,823.00; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to amend the Contract to modify the provisions for the scope of services and to increase the compensation by $698,445.00 to a total of $1,654,268.00; NOW THEREFORE, premises considered, the City and the Engineer agree that said Contract is amended as follows: I. Article 1, City Services and Exhibit A, City Services shall be amended as set forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit A. 11. Article 2, Engineering Services and Exhibit B, Engineering Services shall be amended as set forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit B. Exhibit C, Work Schedule shall be amended as set forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit C. Article 4, Compensation and Exhibit D, Fee Schedule shall be amended by increasing by $698,445.00 the lump suns amount payable under the Contract for a total of $1,654,268.00, as shown by the attached Addendum to Exhibit D. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Engineer have executed this Supplemental Contract in duplicate. Supplemental Contract 0199.1315; 00297202 Rev. 12/01 /08 84275 HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. By: Date CITY OF ROUND ROCK APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Alan McGraw, Mayor Stephan L. Sheets, City Attorney Date Supplemental Contract 0199.1315; 00297202 2 Rev.12/01 /08 84275 ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT A CITY SERVICES The City will furnish to the Engineer the following information and/or perform the following tasks: • Provide a tax exemption form for the purchase of taxable goods and services. • Post and pay for notices in local publications. • Post and maintain project information on City website, as appropriate. • Review Engineer 's plan and submittals, and cost estimates. • Assist the Engineer in obtaining property rights -of -entry for ground surveys and environmental investigations. • Support project development with external stakeholders such as TxDOT, other agencies, and property owners. • Assist the Engineer, as needed, in obtaining data and information from the State, County, and/or other franchise utility companies. • Coordinate and communicate project items and progress to other city departments, as appropriate. Exhibit A RM 620 Safety Improvements — Design Phase Page 1 of 1 ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT B ENGINEERING SERVICES GENERAL PROJECT OVERVIEW For the scope of services for this Work Authorization the Engineer shall provide engineering, surveying, and other professional services to develop 60% Plans Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) and complete right-of-way (ROW) and easement parcels for the RM 620 Safety Improvements from Deepwood Drive to IH 35 in accordance with the preliminary design schematic developed for the project under the professional services contract per city council Resolution No. R -10-10-2810E5. See enclosed Project Location Map. The purpose of the proposed project is to improve safety and enhance mobility in the project area. The project includes a bridge to carry RM 620 traffic over the Union Pacific Railroad and Chisholm Trail Road. In order to maintain access to businesses and residences, at -grade local access roads are proposed between Lake Creek Drive and Chisholm Trail Road. A second bridge is proposed at Lake Creek Drive. This proposed bridge would carry RM 620 traffic over Lake Creek Drive. The project area is within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. For this phase of the contract, PS&E will be developed to a 60% completion level. Contract Tasks shall include: Project Management; Roadway Design; Drainage Design; Water Quality Design; Water and Wastewater Relocation Design; Signing, Pavement Markings, and Traffic Signal Design; Miscellaneous Design (TCP, Illumination, Bridge, Ret Walls, Landscape and Irrigation); Environmental Site Remediation; Utility Coordination; and Public Involvement Tasks are more specifically described in the following Task Outline. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 1 of 20 Project Locatloe. Map RM 620 From Deepwood Drive to IH 35 City of Round Rock VVIYarnson County leant — Proposed Project Raltn>sd BuidinIP IMMO HALFF Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 2 of 20 TASK OUTLINE I. PROJECT MANAGEMENT A. PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1. Project Administration - The Engineer will: • Assign Eric Ratzman (a licensed PE in Texas) to serve as the Project Manager and point of contact for the city. He may not be replaced without written consent from the city of Round Rock. The Project Manager shall communicate with the city's assigned project manager. • Create and submit monthly invoices in required city format. • Prepare monthly progress reports for submission with the invoices to provide a written account of the progress made to date on the project. • Prepare project meeting summaries for applicable meetings during the project development process. • Keep records of project correspondence and make such records available to the city as needed. 2. Sub -consultant Management - The Engineer will: • Prepare and execute contracts with sub -consultants, monitor sub - consultants activities (staff and schedule), complete monthly reports and review and recommend approval of sub -consultant invoices. • Conduct internal meetings with the consultant design team every two weeks for the length of the project. Meetings will include key personnel from each discipline and will discuss and resolve project issues. • Coordinate and review subconsultant work activities and submittals. The Engineer will review and coordinate work of sub -consultants to ensure quality products are delivered to the City. The Engineer will also be responsible for the consistency and coordination between plans developed by each sub -consultant on the design team. 3. Coordination- The Engineer will: • Establish and attend periodic progress meetings (approximately once a month) with the city and TxDOT. • Meet with City staff as required through the project development process. • Coordinate with outside agencies as detailed below. II. SITE CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND ARCHITECTURAL MODIFICATIONS Excluded from this scope (and is to be provided by separate contract). III. ROADWAY DESIGN (60%) A. ROADWAY PLANS 1. TXDOT Submittals a. Engineer will prepare and submit forms for TxDOT reviews, processing, and letting including Form 1002, stage gate checklists, PS&E checklists, and Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 3 of 20 others. The Engineer will develop the following roadway plan sheets: 2. MISCELLANEOUS PLANS. a. Project Title Sheet. b. Detailed Index of Sheets. c. Project Layout sheets at a scale of 1"=200'. 3. ROADWAY PLANS and GEOMETRY a. Existing and Proposed Typical Sections. b. Roadway Plan and Profile Sheets at 1"=50' Horizontally. c. Survey Control Plan Sheets. d. Horizontal Alignment Data Sheets. e. Superelevation Data Sheets f. Removal Plans 4. GRADING AND DETAILS. a. Develop and plot design cross sections for RM 620 at 50 even foot stations for final pavement conditions. Cross sections will be plotted on plan sheets and included as a separate plan set for contractor information. b. Intersection layout sheets for intersections. c. Driveway Detail Sheets. d. Miscellaneous Roadway Detail Sheets. B. DRAINAGE DESIGN (60%) 1. Storm Sewer Design a. Produce Interior Drainage Area Maps at 1"=100' scale b. Calculate Storm Drain Calculations and design using GEOPAK DRAINAGE software and TxDOT Drainage Design Criteria c. Produce drainage plans and profiles at 1"=50' scale d. Design temporary drainage facilities for the phased construction 2. SW3P and Erosion Control Plans C. WATER QUALITY DESIGN (60%) 1. Water Quality Facility Design (for Edward's Aquifer Recharge Zone) a. Project Setup and Data Review Perform a geologic assessment: Engineer will obtain and review available data on the existing and proposed roadway design and site geology, including engineering plans and geologic reports. An initial field visit will be conducted in order to inspect the site and identify and evaluate potential locations for water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs). b. Pollutant Removal Calculations and Design of Water Quality BMPs Engineer will perform the required total suspended solids (TSS) pollutant load calculations and update design of water quality facilities, such as the extended detention ponds proposed in the 30% design plans. Best Management Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 4 of 20 Practices will be designed according to the TCEQ's technical guidance manual complying with the Edwards Aquifer Rules — Technical Guidance on Best Management Practices (RG -348, July 2005) and addenda. The location of temporary erosion and sedimentation controls designed to prevent discharges of polluted runoff from the project site during construction will be evaluated to ensure compliance with TCEQ Edwards Aquifer requirements. The design of temporary controls, including an erosion and sedimentation control plan, will be included as part of the contractor's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW3P). This task will include coordination with TxDOT and preliminary consultation meeting with TCEQ. The WPAP will be prepared/submitted in the final phase of plan development. D. WATER AND WASTEWATER RELOCATION DESIGN (60%) ENGINEER will perform engineering services within the described project area to prepare plans, specifications, and estimates for relocation of City of Round Rock water and wastewater lines within the project limits. The wastewater lines vary in size from 8 to 12 inch and the waterlines range from 6 to 12 inch. Project will include various crossings/bores, services and appurtenances. 1. 60% Water & Wastewater Replacement Design per the City of Round Rock Design and Construction Standards a. Dimension control b. Utility alignment & layout c. Line size determination as directed by the City of Round Rock d. Water and wastewater plan and profile sheets. Profile all waterlines greater than but not including 8". Provide profiles for any size waterline at roadway crossings. Profile all proposed wastewater lines. e. Prepare engineers estimate of probable construction cost f. Schedule an on the ground walk through with the City project manager to look at constructability, possible problem areas for construction, etc. 60% Water & Wastewater PS&E Deliverables: • Provide plan and profile drawings indicating horizontal and vertical alignment of proposed facilities (with 30% comments addressed) • Provide updated cost estimates E. SIGNING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN (60%) 1. Provide small sign and pavement marking layout plans at 1 "=50' scale 2. Signalization Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 5 of 20 a. Engineer will develop traffic signal plans for permanent mast arm signals at the intersections of RM 620 with Deepwood Dr., Lake Creek Dr., and IH 35 SBFR. The signal plans will be prepared at a scale of 1"=40'. Engineer will design the signal plans to a 60% completion to obtain a reasonable cost estimate for all the signal work on this project. Engineer will include following sheets for the submittal: (i) Existing Conditions sheets will show locations of existing traffic control devices, and underground, and overhead utilities at each intersection, from the survey data. (ii)Signal Layout sheets will show the locations of proposed signal poles, pedestrian poles, signal heads, communication equipment, electrical conduits, ground boxes, signal cabinet, new electrical service, existing utilities, right of way, and proposed roadway improvements. Locations of pedestrian poles and pedestrian access ramps will be designed in conformance with ADA requirements. The plans will include audible pedestrian signal head units at every pedestrian crossing. Due to lateral and vertical clearance required from an overhead electric line (per the State law), the Engineer will coordinate with the City before finalizing locations of signal poles. (iii) Signal Elevation sheets will show placement of signal heads on each mast -arm and vertical clearance required for the mast -arm. (b) Coordinate design with city and TxDOT traffic signal reviewers including up to three (3) meetings with reviewers regarding signal modifications. F. MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY 1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS a. The Engineer will develop overview plans for each stage of the traffic control plan. These plans will act as key maps for each phase of TCP and shall be developed at a 1"=500' scale in order to depict the full project on one sheet. The traffic control for this project consists of five (5) major phases. The overview plans will depict the boundaries of each layout sheet and proposed construction areas. b. The Engineer will prepare 1"=500' plan layouts of all advance warning signs for RM 620, IH 35 and all cross streets. c. The Engineer will prepare a detailed narrative for the sequence of construction and traffic control general notes to submit to the City for review and incorporation into the plans. The narrative will include a phase -by -phase description of the major construction activities. This is intended to be a narrative account of the activities shown in the traffic control plans. d. The Engineer will prepare traffic control typical sections for each phase / step of the construction sequence to clearly delineate the position of traffic and barriers with respect to the proposed construction. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 6 of 20 e. The Engineer will prepare detailed traffic control plans at a scale of 1"=100'. These plans will be developed based on the City's approval of the conceptual plans developed at the 30% PS&E level. This plan will describe the maintenance of traffic and sequence of work for each phase of the proposed construction. Detour alignments, location of work areas, temporary paving, temporary shoring, signing, barricades and other details will be required to describe the traffic control plan. The Engineer will ensure that proper drainage can be maintained during each phase of construction. f. The Engineer will prepare detour layouts at a scale of 1"=100' H and 1"=10' V showing plan & profiles where needed to define the geometry for detours used in the traffic control plans. When widening is required that can be defined based on existing pavement slopes, a detour profile will not be prepared. g. The Engineer will prepare profiles for temporary shoring required during construction sequencing at a scale of 1"=100' H and 1"=10' V. Existing ground and top of shoring will be depicted on these sheets. Existing ground and top of shoring elevations will be indicated at 50 feet intervals. 2.. ILLUMINATION a. The Engineer will prepare detailed layouts at a scale of 1"=100' depicting safety lighting for the gores of the ramps and the roundabout and underpass lighting for the bridges at the UPRR / Chisholm Trail Road and at Lake Creek Drive. b. The Engineer will identify potential overhead utility conflicts, and coordinate with the State and the utility company to help resolve the conflicts. 3. RETAINING WALLS a. The Engineer will provide a location plan of all walls at a scale of 1"=200'. The intent is to show the location of all walls in plan including the wall designation and beginning and ending stations. b. The Engineer will update layouts for fifteen (15) retaining walls based on review comments and completion of the project design. The layouts will show plan and profile views of the retaining walls at a maximum scale of 1"=40'. c. The Engineer will update typical sections for retaining walls based on review comments and completion of the project design. d. The Engineer will prepare soil nail layouts at a maximum of 1"=10' scale. The layout will provide location of soil nails in elevation view at a maximum scale of 1"=10'. e. The Engineer will prepare structural design details for non-proprietary wall designs (i.e., soil nail) required for the project. It is anticipated that one of the retaining walls on the project will be non-proprietary. f. The Engineer will prepare aesthetic details based on the approved conceptual aesthetic theme from the City. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 7 of 20 4. BRIDGE LAYOUTS & DESIGN The grade separation on RM 620 at Lake Creek Drive is anticipated to be a two span overpass structure with two lanes both in eastbound and westbound directions. The grade separation on RM 620 at the existing UPRR track and Chisholm Trail Road is anticipated to be a five span overpass structure with two lanes in the westbound direction and three lanes in the eastbound direction. a. The Engineer will update preliminary bridge layouts (1"=40') and typical sections for the UPRR Overpass and for the Lake Creek Drive Overpass based on review comments and as needed for completion of the project design. The Engineer will complete the above described layout for each overpass. The bridge layouts shall include: Plan View (1) Horizontal curve data (ii) Bearing of centerline (iii) Bridge skew angles (iv) Control stations at the begin and end of structures (v) Dimensioned widths of bridge, roadway, shoulders and sidewalks (vi) Limits of riprap (if required) (vii) North arrow (viii) Cross slope and super elevation data (ix) Railing type (x) Bent stations and bearings (xi) Retaining wall locations (xii) Approach pavement crown width (xiii) Typical bridge section displaying beam type and spacing (xiv) Joint and seal type Profile View (1) Profile grade (ii) Vertical curve data (iii) Finished roadway elevation at begin/end of structure (iv) Overall length of structure (v) Existing and proposed ground lines clearly marked (vi) Profile view of grid elevations and stations (vii) Type of foundation, number, size and length of foundation elements (viii) Bent numbers (ix) Fixed or expansion condition at each beam end (x) Column heights (xi) Soil core data including penetrometer values and soil classification will be provided in Boring Log Sheets. (x) Any other information required in the TXDOT LRFD Bridge Design and Bridge Detailer's Manuals. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 8 of 20 b. The Engineer will perform detailed design and create custom bridge details for the Lake Creek and UPRR/Chisholm Trail Road Overpasses. Bridge design will be completed using 2013 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and HL 93 Loading. No detailed design work is to be performed until the State has given the Engineer approval of the preliminary bridge layouts. The Engineer will design and develop details for the following items for each of the structures: (i) Boring Logs (showing bridge profile with foundation tips) (ii) Estimated Quantities and Bearing Seat Elevations (i) Abutments (Details for one abutment only) (ii) Inverted T -Cap Interior Bents (Design only) (iii) Concrete I -Girder Spans (iv) I -Girder Design (v) Foundation Design (vi) Miscellaneous Bent Details (for both bridges) (vii) Bridge Aesthetic Theme and Features Details (for both bridges) c. The Engineer will list the necessary TxDOT Statewide Standards for inclusion in the 60% contract plan set. d. 60% Deliverables: • Bridge Layout • Foundation Boring Log • Estimated Quantities and Bearing Seat Elevations • Abutment Details • Interior Bent Details • Form Liner Details for Column • Beam Layout • Concrete Beam Unit Details • Miscellaneous Bent Details • IGND Bridge Girder Design • Bridge Standards 5. RAILROAD COORDINATION AND EXHIBIT 'A' Engineer will update Railroad Exhibit 'A' documents based on TxDOT and UPRR review comments to 30% submittal. 6. AMENITIES, LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION (60%) a. Coordinate preparation of bridge and retaining wall plans with engineering staff, to depict the desired design character and themes for retaining walls and bridge structures on the project. Coordination efforts to include preparation of sketch designs to be implemented into wall and structures plans by engineering and structural design staff. b. Provide design concepts for other amenity improvements for the project, including special signage, iconic elements, gateway features, special light Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 9 of 20 fixtures or other amenity components, for implementation within the plan sets of other engineering and design professionals working on the project. c. Conduct research with appropriate city staff to determine quantity of new tree plantings required to mitigate tree removals caused by the project. 7. QUANTITIES a. The Engineer will calculate quantities for each of the following and as necessary to provide an Engineer's estimate of probable cost: (i) Roadway Plans (ii) Removal Plans (iii) Drainage Plans (iv) Water Quality Plans (v) Water and Wastewater Relocation Plans (vi) Signs, pavement markings, and signals (vii) Traffic Control Plans (viii) Illumination Plans (ix) Retaining Wall Plans (x) Bridge Plans 8. STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE a. The Engineer will identify the appropriate TxDOT standards for the project. Standards that require modification will be revised and sealed by the Engineer. The Engineer will utilize TxDOT Austin District standards when applicable. b. The Engineer will work with City and TxDOT to complete the basis of estimate prior to beginning quantity calculations. c. The Engineer will prepare an opinion of probable construction cost at the 60% submittal. IV. UTILITY COORDINATION AND ENGINEERING: The Engineer shall perform all Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE), Utility Coordination, and Utility Engineering services for approximately eleven (11) utilities as listed below: Underground • AT&T — Telephone • AT&T — Fiber Optic Cable • Grande Communications — Fiber Optic Cable • MCI (Verizon Business) — Fiber Optic Cable • TW Telecom — Fiber Optic Cable • City of Round Rock — Water • City of Round Rock — Wastewater • Time Warner Cable — Cable TV • Atmos Energy — Gas • Oncor Electric Delivery — Electric • LCRA — Electric Transmission Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 10 of 20 The work to be performed by the Engineer under this contract shall consist of providing engineering services required for SUE, Utility Coordination and Utility Engineering on the RM 620 Roadway PS&E Project. The existing utility file will be referenced into the current roadway design sheets to create a test hole location work plan. Based on the review of existing utilities and proposed roadway design sheets, approximately 20 test holes will be required. A sketch of the area to be included for the proposed test hole locations "Level A" will be provided prior to the start of the work and must be approved by the City of Round Rock. These services include SUE, utility adjustment coordination activities including but not limited to, meeting and contact with utilities on the project, initial project notifications, preparation of existing utility layouts, providing progress reports, preparation of contact lists, reviewing conflicts between the utilities and the proposed project, resolutions of utility conflicts, creation of a utility conflict list, agreement/permit coordination and review, review of the proposed utility adjustments, and recommending the proposed locations of the utility adjustments. The above list of services is general in nature and should not be considered inclusive to the engineer's responsibilities, as listed in the following scope. 1. Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) including utility investigations subsurface and above ground prepared in accordance with AASHTO standards [ASCE C-1 38- 02] and Utility Quality Levels as follows. i. Utility Quality Levels are defined in cumulative order (least to greatest) as follows: a. Quality Level D - Existing Records: Utilities are plotted from review of available existing records. b. Quality Level C - Surface Visible Feature Survey: Quality level "D" information from existing records is correlated with surveyed surface -visible features. Includes Quality Level D information. If there are variances in the designated work area of Level D then a new schematic or plan layout, if needed, is required showing the limits of the proposed project and limits of the work area required for this work authorization; including highway stations, limits within existing or proposed right of way, additional areas outside the proposed right of way, and distances or areas to be included down existing intersecting roadways. c. Quality Level B - Designate: Two-dimensional horizontal mapping. This information is obtained through the application and interpretation of appropriate non-destructive surface geophysical methods. Utility indications are referenced to established survey control. Incorporates quality levels C and D information to produce Quality Level B. If there are variances in the designated work area of Level D then a new schematic or plan layout, if needed, is required showing the limits of the proposed project and limits of the work area required for this work authorization; including highway stations, limits within existing or proposed right of way, additional areas outside the proposed right of way, and distances or areas to be included down existing intersecting roadways. d. Quality Level A - Locate (Test Hole): Three-dimensional mapping and other characterization data. This information is obtained through exposing utility facilities through test holes and measuring and recording (to appropriate survey control) utility/environment data. Incorporates quality levels B, C and D information to produce Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 11 of 20 Quality Level A. ii. Subsurface Utility Locate (Test Hole) Service (Quality Level A) (Up to 20 Test Holes), Locate means to obtain precise horizontal and vertical position, material type, condition, size and other data that may be obtainable about the utility facility and its surrounding environment through exposure by non-destructive excavation techniques that ensures the integrity of the utility facility. Subsurface Utility Locate (Test Hole) Services (Quality Level A) are inclusive of Quality Levels B, C, and D. The Engineer shall: a. Review requested test hole locations and advise the City of Round Rock in the development of an appropriate locate (test hole) work plan relative to the existing utility infrastructure and proposed highway design elements. b. Coordinate with utility owner inspectors as may be required by law or utility owner policy. c. Neatly cut and remove existing pavement material, such that the cut not to exceed 0.10 square meters (1.076 square feet) unless unusual circumstances exist. d. Measure and record the following data on an appropriately formatted test hole data sheet that has been sealed and dated by the Engineer: i. Elevation of top and/or bottom of utility tied to the datum of the furnished plan. ii. Identify a minimum of two benchmarks utilized. Elevations shall be within an accuracy of 15mm (.591 inches) of utilized benchmarks. iii. Elevation of existing grade over utility at test hole location. iv. Horizontal location referenced to project coordinate datum. v. Outside diameter of pipe or width of duct banks and configuration of non-encased multi-conduit systems. vi. Utility facility material(s). vii. Utility facility condition. viii. Pavement thickness and type. ix. Coating/ Vrapping information and condition. x. Unusual circumstances or field conditions. e. Excavate test holes in such a manner as to prevent any damage to wrappings, coatings, cathodic protection or other protective coverings and features. f. Be responsible for any damage to the utility during the locating process. In the event of damage, the Engineer shall stop work, notify the appropriate utility facility owner, City of Round Rock, and appropriate regulatory agencies. The regulatory agencies include, but are not limited to the Railroad Commission of Texas and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. The Engineer will not resume work until the utility facility owner has determined the corrective action to be taken. The Engineer shall be liable for costs involved in the repair or replacement of the utility facility. g. Back fill excavations with appropriate material, compact backfill by mechanical means, and restore pavement and surface material. The Engineer shall be responsible for the integrity of the backfill and surface restoration for a period of three years. Install a marker Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 12 of 20 ribbon throughout the backfill. h. Furnish and install a permanent above ground marker directly above center line of the utility facility. i. Provide complete restoration of work site and landscape to equal or better condition than before excavation. If a work site and landscape is not appropriately restored, the Engineer shall return to correct the condition at no extra charge to the City of Round Rock. j. Plot utility location position information to scale. 2. Utility Adjustment Coordination including utility coordination meetings with individual utility companies, communication and coordination with utilities, and preparation and review of utility agreements/permits. i. The Utility Coordinator shall perform utility coordination and liaison activities with involved utility owners, their consultants, and the City of Round Rock to achieve timely project notifications, formal coordination meetings, conflict analysis and resolution. a. The Utility Coordinator shall coordinate all activities with the City of Round Rock, or their designee, to facilitate the orderly progress and timely completion of the design phase. The Utility Coordinator will be responsible for the following: a. The Utility Coordinator shall provide initial project notification letters to all affected utility companies, owners, and other concerned parties, if needed. b. The Utility Coordinator shall provide the City of Round Rock and all affected utility companies and owners a Utility Contact List for each project with all information such as: (a) Owner's Name; (b) Contact Person; (c) Telephone Numbers; (d) Emergency Contact Number; (e) E-mail addresses; (f) as well as all pertinent information concerning their respective affected utilities and facilities, including but not limited to: size, number of poles, material, and other information which readily identifies the utilities companies' facilities. c. The Utility Coordinator shall advise utility companies and owners of the general characteristics of the Project and provide an illustration of the project footprint for mark-up of the utility facility locations that occupy the project area. ii. The Utility Coordinator shall coordinate which utilities will conflict with highway construction or the "Utility Accommodation Rules" (UAR), and make the utility company aware of these conflicts. The Utility Coordinator shall assist the utility companies in the preparation of required agreements associated with the funding of adjustments and the occupation of state right of way; 2. Utility Agreement Assemblies: A packaged agreement consisting of a Utility Joint Use Acknowledgement, Standard Utility Agreements, Plans on 11x17 sheets, Statement of contract work form, Affidavit form and copy of recorded easement, schedule of work and various attachments as detailed in the UAR and the State's Utility Manual. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 13 of 20 a. Utility Agreements (3 estimated for this project): If a utility is located within an easement, the utility company may have a compensable interest. The utility company must furnish a copy of their easement to the Utility Coordinator. The Utility Coordinator shall determine whether or not a compensable interest exists and the owner's degree of eligibility. The Utility Coordinator shall assist the utility company with adjustment plans and cost estimate for these adjustments. The Utility Coordinator shall review plans to ensure compliance with UAR and to ensure that the proposal will not conflict with highway construction. The Utility Coordinator will submit a copy of the easement, plans, and estimate to the City of Round Rock by letter recommending approval. The utility should be reimbursed all cost incurred within their easement limits for replacement in kind. b. Utility Permits (8 estimated for this project): For this project, all Non -Reimbursable Utility Adjustments shall be submitted with the form Notice of Proposed Installation (Form 1082). The Utility Coordinator will furnish the appropriate form to the utility company and assist them with adjustment plan preparation. The utility company should submit the Utility Permit and adjustment plans to the Utility Coordinator for review. The Utility Coordinator shall review plans to ensure compliance with UAR and to ensure that the proposal will not conflict with highway construction. The Utility company will submit the Utility Permit and PS&E to TxDOT through their on-line system. c. The Utility Coordinator will submit the required number of executed copies of the Utility Agreement assemblies, which include the appropriate Forms as detailed in the UAR, a copy of the recorded easement Deed, plans, and estimate to the City of Round Rock by letter recommending approval. The Transmittal letter should include the following statement "The proposed utility adjustment will not conflict with proposed highway construction and will comply with UAR. The utility should be reimbursed eligible costs incurred within their easement limits for replacement in kind." The transmittal should also provide a description of the work being done as well as the estimated cost and schedule of work. d. The Utility Coordinator shall be solely responsible for determining which utilities will be installed by "Permit", or by "Agreement". e. The Engineer shall maintain a complete set of records for all Utility Adjustment Costs for each Utility for a period of time sufficient to complete all final payments to the utility companies or owners. 3. Utility Engineering including the identification of utility conflicts, compliance with Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 14 of 20 TxDOT's UAR, and resolution of utility conflicts. The Engineer shall coordinate all activities with the City of Round Rock, or their designee, to facilitate the orderly progress and timely completion of the design phase. Coordination of engineering activities include: a. Utility Layout: The Engineer shall maintain a utility layout in the latest version of Microstation used by the City of Round Rock. This layout shall include existing utilities which are to remain in place or be abandoned, and adjusted utilities. This layout will be utilized to monitor the necessity and evaluate alternatives. The Engineer will utilize the layout of existing utilities as prepared, if available, and make a determination of the following; i. Facilities in conflict with the proposed project that are to be relocated. ii. Facilities to be abandoned in place. iii. Facilities to remain in service and in place. iv. The Engineer shall be responsible for determining if there are additional facilities, not shown in the Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) documents, which require relocation. The Engineer shall coordinate this information with the City of Round Rock immediately upon discovery. b. Public & Individual Meetings with Utility Companies and the City of Round Rock as required, to facilitate utility conflict identification and resolution (approximately 4 public utility meetings and 22 individual utility meetings). c. Progress Meetings: Meet with the City of Round Rock periodically to coordinate the work effort and resolve problems and prepare a written report of such meetings. The meetings will review: i. Activities completed since the last meeting ii. Problems encountered. iii. Late activities. iv. Activities required by the next progress meeting. v. Solutions for unresolved and/or anticipated problems. vi. Information or items required from other agencies/consultants. vii. Review of Utility's Proposed Adjustments viii. Evaluate Alternatives: The Engineer will evaluate alternatives in the adjustment of utilities balancing the needs of both the City of Round Rock and the Utility. ix. Review Estimates and Schedules: The Engineer will review the utility adjustment estimates for reasonableness of cost and the timely scheduling of the adjustment. x. Review Plans for compliance with TxDOT's UAR and proposed location data. The responsibility for quality and accuracy of Utility adjustment plans will remain with the Utility Company. d. Prepare a Proposed Utility Layout in the latest version of MicroStation used by the City of Round Rock that can be overlaid on the base file and determine the following; i. All facilities conflicts have been resolved. ii. All stakeholders have concurred with the various alignments. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 15 of 20 iii. Establish the sequence of construction for utility relocation work. iv. Determine which utilities will be built as part of the contract. v. Determine which facilities will be relocated prior to construction. e. Review PS&E for utilities including the ones in the construction contract. Deliverables: • Two (2) Existing Utility Layouts (11"x17") signed and sealed by a Texas Professional Engineer & 2 CDs-Microstation compatible containing DGN files in US feet (2D) format, .pdf format, and scanned record information in .pdf format if received from each utility • Two (2) Test Hole Data Sheets signed and sealed by a Texas Professional Engineer & 2 CDs-Microstation compatible containing DGN files in US feet (2D) format and .pdf format • Utility Contact List • Potential Conflict Analysis Spreadsheet • Two (2) Proposed Utility Layouts (11"x17") signed and sealed by a Texas Professional Engineer & 2 CDs-Microstation compatible containing DGN files in US feet (2D) format and .pdf format • Meeting minutes (delivered electronically) for approximately 4 meetings • Utility Agreements/Permits V. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Environmental — Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Support and Salamander Assessments The City of Round Rock is considering the use of federal funds for reimbursement of right-of-way acquisition for this project, which may trigger the need for consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) related to the endangered Bone Cave Harvestman (Texella reyesi; BCH) and the threatened Jollyville Plateau salamander (Eurycea tonkawae; JPS). Both species are known to occur in the vicinity of the project area; although, our prior investigations determined that the BCH is not likely to be taken by the proposed project. This proposal also includes additional field investigations and analysis pertaining to the JPS, which was added to the federal endangered species list in September 2013. 1. Jollyville Plateau Salamander Presence/Absence Investigation/Survey a. The project is located in close proximity to a stretch of Brushy Creek that may or may not be occupied by the JPS. The species is known to occur in spring runs located both upstream and downstream of the project within the Brushy Creek drainage basin and additional habitat may occur elsewhere in the basin. One minor spring was located adjacent to the project (but not within the project limits) during the geologic assessment study conducted by SWCA in 2013. Additionally, Brushy Creek is a gaining stream in the project area due to multiple areas of discharge from Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 16 of 20 the Edwards Aquifer. These factors indicate that habitat may be present in close proximity to the project. b. Under this task the Engineer will conduct a presence/absence investigation for the JPS both within the spring and the main channel of Brushy Creek. We propose to incorporate the USFWS's draft protocols for conducting such surveys, which require at least 20 survey visits under suitable conditions and drift netting or bottle trapping at the spring outlet or spring run to infer absence. Our sampling method for the spring and shallow areas of Brushy Creek will conform to visual encounter survey methods used by Pierce (Pierce et al. 2010) for other Eurycea sites in Williamson County. Passive sampling will also be conducted. Following active surveys bottle traps will be placed in Brushy Creek and left for a minimum of three days before being recovered and searched for Eurycea specimens. If encountered, individual salamanders will be photo documented. Temporary capture and release may be required for photo documentation; no specimens will be collected permanently. To date, no investigators have been permitted by the USFWS for conducting such surveys. This scope assumes that our application for a USFWS Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit authorizing work with the JPS will be approved prior to the beginning of the suitable sampling season, or that other temporary authorization may be granted. Right of entry will also be required to access the spring. Being a navigable stream, Brushy Creek itself is accessible without explicit right-of-entry according to state law. • Deliverables: A report presenting the results of our investigations will be provided. The report format and content will conform to the reporting requirement of the USFWS's draft JPS sampling protocols and must be provided to the USFWS. 2. Jollyville Plateau Salamander Impacts Assessment a. The proposed project occurs within the known range of the JPS upstream of designated Critical Habitat Unit 2. Under this task Engineer, will conduct an assessment of the potential for adverse effects to the JPS and for adverse modification of designated critical habitat resulting from the proposed project. The assessment will consider Edwards Aquifer hydrogeology, site-specific habitat and occupancy conditions (based on the results of Task 1), applicable water quality standards, and potential contaminant pathways between the project and known salamander locations • Deliverables: A report presenting the results of our analysis and professional opinions on the likelihood of potential effects will be provided 3. Biological Assessment and Section 7 Consultation Support a. The need for this task will ultimately depend on the results of the JPS work in Tasks 1 and 2; if the federal funding agencies determine that the project will have "no effect" on either listed species then no consultation will be necessary. This scope and budget assumes that the City of Round Rock will accept federal funding for the project and that construction activities "may affect" the BCH or JPS, or both. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 17 of 20 b. Engineer will prepare a Biological Assessment (BA) on behalf of the federal funding agency of the expected impacts of construction on the BCH and JPS. The BA will also be required to address the potential for impacts to other federally listed and proposed species occurring in the project region; the list of species to be addressed in the BA will be developed through coordination with the USFWS. Any required field data are expected to be available as a result of the completion of prior environmental investigations, including the tasks above. The BA will address both the direct and cumulative impacts to federally listed and proposed species that are expected to result from construction and operation of the project. c. Section 7 provides for both an informal and formal consultation process, based on the likelihood for significant adverse effects that are generally considered to be equivalent to "take". If take can be avoided, then an informal consultation with USFWS may be possible and is likely to involve no rnore than three coordination meetings and a letter of concurrence from the USFWS. If a formal consultation is warranted, our recent experience indicates that significant agency coordination is likely, including several rounds of comment and response on the draft BA and related USFWS Biological Opinion (BO) between interested parties potentially including the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Austin District, TxDOT Environmental Affairs, the USFWS, Federal Highways Administration, City of Round Rock, and others. The formal consultation process is concluded with the USFWS issuing a BO with an incidental take statement and required reasonable and prudent measures to minimize impacts to the affected species. • Deliverables: Draft BA for client and federal funding agency review; followed by a final BA for consultation with USFWS. Meeting summaries and comment responses as necessary to document the process. B. Federal Categorical Exclusion Address the classification of the project as a Federal Categorical Exclusion (CE), and the federal listing of the Jollyville Plateau salamander. The project will need to be processed as Federal Categorical Exclusion (CE) due to new federal funding available for right-of-way reimbursement. The environmental process will follow guidance published on February 12, 2014 regarding Categorical Exclusion (CE) determinations. The project is considered a "d -list" project based on 23 CFR 771.117(d): 3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction or replacement of the construction of grade separation to replace existing at -grade bridge crossing. As of February 2014, federal CE approval has been delegated by FHWA to TxDOT. The TxDOT Austin District will be responsible for certifying the CE. 1. Environmental Management and Documentation Halff will be responsible for daily management of the environmental tasks and documents. Including: Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 18 of 20 a. Coordinate the daily environmental study activities of the project b. Participate in conference calls and meetings with the City and TxDOT 2. Restatement of Project Scope The Engineer will prepare a Project Scope (version February 2014), that will outline deliverables for the project and planned agency coordination. The City of Round Rock and TxDOT Austin District will sign the Project Scope once approved. 3. Cultural Resources (Archeology and Historic Structures) — Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Perform additional Section 106 survey for cultural resources due to the federal classification of this project. Revised archeological and historic resources reports will be prepared and submitted for Texas Historical Commission/SHPO consultation. The Engineer will coordinate with the subconsultant, review reports, and submit reports to TxDOT for review and agency coordination. This task assumes coordination with the Texas Historical Commission initiated by the TxDOT Environmental Affairs Division. Section 106 requires coordination with local entities regarding their historic preservation. TxDOT will initiate agency coordination with the Williamson County Historical Commission. a. Project Coordination Request, Cultural Resources Background Study Report, and NEPA Text Engineer will review the existing files held by the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory (TARL) and the Texas Historical Commission (THC) to determine if any previously recorded cultural resource sites or archeological surveys occur within or near the proposed project area. The location of any previously recorded sites and surveys will be plotted onto USGS 7.5 -minute topographic maps for use in the compliance coordination process. Archeologists will also consult the USDA NRCS soil survey maps for Williamson County, relevant aerial photography, historical maps, land use maps, and the Geologic Atlas of Texas in order to assess the likelihood for unrecorded archeological resources and make recommendations regarding the need for further field surveys. The results of this effort will be integrated into a background study report that conforms to TxDOT's Standards of Uniformity (SOUs) for Archeological Background Studies for review and comment by TxDOT- ENV b. Archeological Field Survey and Survey Report If required by TxDOT, Engineer will develop an application for a Texas Antiquities Permit and submit it to TxDOT-ENV for review and processing. Upon issuance of the permit, the Engineer will conduct a field survey. Engineer will deploy a team of archeologists to conduct a pedestrian survey including shovel testing along the entire length of the proposed APE. Engineer will follow the THC requirement of 16 shovel tests per mile per transect. All excavated soil will be screened through 1/4 -inch mesh and all artifacts will be analyzed in the field and reburied; no artifacts will be collected. Sites (if any are discovered) will be delineated by digging additional manual shovel tests (no backhoe or mechanized equipment) and their locations will be Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 19 of 20 documented by sub -meter GPS. Sites will be recorded on State of Texas archeological data sheets, photographed and sketch mapped. Backhoe trenching is not anticipated as part of this scope of work as it is assumed that soils will be shallow enough to assess using a shovel. • Deliverables: Engineer will prepare a professional report documenting the results of the fieldwork. The report will fully document all methods and results of the survey and will offer clear assessments of NRHP/SAL eligibility for all sites. The report will present explicit management recommendations for each site. The draft report will be presented in electronic format to Client for review and comment and upon approval will be submitted in hard copy for submission to TxDOT. Upon receipt of review comments, Engineer will prepare the final report and distribute these in compliance with the terms of the permit. The Engineer will perform the services Engineer's office(s) as listed below: Service Project Management and Engineering Utility Design and Coordination Sub -Consultants: CP&Y, Inc. (CPY) Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) SWCA Consultants (SWCA) AmaTerra Environmental, Inc. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase to be provided under this agreement out of Office Location Halff Associates, Inc. 4030 West Braker Lane, Suite 450 Austin, TX 78759 Halff Associates, Inc. Two Sierra Way, Suite 105 Georgetown, TX 78626 Page 20 of 20 ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT C WORK SCHEDULE Halff Associates Inc. is prepared to continue work on this project immediately upon notice -to -proceed from the City of Round Rock. The proposed date for completion of services is May of 2015**. The proposed contract milestones are as follows: • Contract Award / Notice to Proceed: May 2014 • TASK I: Project Management: May 2014 - May 2015 • TASK II: Site Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Services (excluded) • TASK III: Roadway Design (60% PS&E) o Submittal of 60% PS&E for review: September 2014 • TASK IV: Utility Engineering and Coordination o Begin coordination with utility companies: May 2014 o Submittal of 60% PS&E to utility companies: September 2014 o Deadline for plans from utility companies: November 2014* o Review utility plans for conflict resolution: January 2014* o Finalize utility relocation plans: February 2014* o Utility agreements/permit: March 2014 thru May 2015* o Begin relocation work: Upon completion of ROW aquisition* • TASK V: Public Involvement and Environmental o Public Involvement coordination efforts on-going and as needed o Submit Sampling application to USFWS: May 2014 o Field Sampling Surveys: May thru July 2014 (contingent upon USFWS permit approval)** o Begin informal consultation with USFWS: July 2014 *Subject to cooperation and progress by third -party utility companies. ** Informal consultation with USFWS is anticipated to take at least 6 months. Formal consultation could take 18 months or more. Exhibit C RM 620 Safety Improvements — Final Design Phase CITY OF ROUND ROCK EXHIBIT " D " - RM 620 FINAL DESIGN EXHIBIT D - FEE SCHEDULE DIRECT TASK/DESCRIPTION LABOR COSTS PRINTING, PLOTTING DELIV, TRAVEL & MISC SUB - CONSULTANTS TOTAL COST FOR TASK (INCL MULT'S) FEE SUMMARY $37,940 $458,032 $114,780 $87,693 I PROJECT MANAGEMENT $36,890 800 250 II SITE CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND ARCHITECTURAL MODS $200,8$0 $74,323 III ROADWAY DESIGN (100% PS&E) $257,142 IV UTILITY COORDINATION $89,780 $25,000 V ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $13,305 $20 $45 TOTAL FEE $397,117 $820 $25,295 $275,213 $698,445 463024b2-c299-4e6e-8cf9-835fe5a2368e.xlsx: Halff Associates Inc. 1 OF 1 ACORD ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT E INSURANCE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I 07/lo0 / 2x01013 THIS CERTIFICATE I8 ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIRCATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER([), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER IMPORTANT: H the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL NSUREO, the policy{ies) must be endorsed. N SUBROGATION L4 WANED, subject the terms the to to the and conditions of policy, certain policies may require an endorsement A statement on this certificate does not confer rights ceniflcate holder in Ileu of such endorsement(s). ■SBL Bell Insurance Agency 16980 Dallas Parkway Dallas. TX 75248 Candy Goehring vdc,,_MP,e Ik 972.581.4915 (iAl'�c,,.. 972.581.4916 Asa: cgoehring4bellgroup.com INSUREMIN AFFORDING COVEIUME NAM MUURMA: Massachusetts Bay 22306 unmet) Halff Associates, Inc. 1201 N. Bowser Richardson, TX 75081 INDREls: Allmerica Financial Benefit 41840 mswwwc: The Hanover Ins. Co. 22292 meUREAo, ACE American Ins. Co. 22667 INSURER E: MEG EXP (My mom) INSURER F: X Contractual COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 13/14 Master SMIL Prof REVISION NUNBFR: THIS INDICATED, CERTIFICATE IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTMN. OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW WIVE BEEN (8SUeO TO THE INS&$3EO NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PER100 TERMOR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POUGES DESCRIED HEREIN L9 SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, POLICIES. 0NTS SHOWN MAY HAVE 8EEN REDUCED BY PAllpOaCLAMS. AND CONOITION3 OF SUCH y�EXCLUSIONS LTA MEM MUMS= agR.YfVO POKY WNW 1�YI LaYApTM') MISTS A ea IMALLI INSIT X COMMERCIAL GErERM ---^i CLAIMS -MADE UABEITY © OCCUR Liab. i ': t ` ZD DA05127807/1212013 07M2J2014 EAC00001RRENCE s 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 , P0EmmEs ms mm ew) MEG EXP (My mom) S 10,000 X Contractual PERSONAL dADVINJURY s 1,000,000 I GENERALAGGREGATE s 2,000,000 GOAL AGGREG�ATE LqM APPLES PER: I POUCY I^ 1 PJECT 7 LOC ;PRODUCTS-CO►P/OPAGG s 2,000,000 i s B AUTOMOBIEUmMUY X I ONMAX, Ninnies 7 Q MEI) AUTOS X SCHEDULED 1 AWDAOS1300 071122013 07I1212014l1� "6 s'"' "" s 1,000,000 1 BODILY INJURY (IM pr,m) 3 I BODILY INJURY TAN moMD 1 iw S C X UMMRLAUM Pxusews X occUi CLAMS -MADE UHDA05128707112/2013 0711212014 EACHOCcwaENcE $ 5,000,000 '!AGGREGATE s 5,000,000 nen X) RETENnmNs 10, 00d S B .1 KERS BLT AMO EMPLOYERf'lSlalT' YIN; ANY PROM:SU RP --: . • _ :© i NIA: OFFICERMEIBER EXCLUDED? Ndtys�nAO,mny In NN) OEACRPT/ON OF OPERATIONS Mos W2DA02864 07/1212013 07/12120141 X li«tYTL697%I I ER t EL. EACH ACCIDENT S I, OOO,OOO EL. DISEASE -EA Bowyer s 1,000,000 I EL. DISEASE -POLICY LINT S 1,000,000 D Professional Liability Claims Made Policy EDNG2167384507/1212013 0712l2014i $5,000,000 Per Claim Limit 55,000,000 Aggregate Limit 34SCP PT1ON OP OPBILMNS I LOf *110NSl VEHICLES IANLM ACORO f01. MORGAN blurb SehMuts a men man N r.p*ad) 2E: RM 620; 30 day notice of cancellation applies except for 10 days for non payment of premium General liability is primary non-contributory if required by written contract. REVISED 2-12-14 CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION City of Round Rock City Manager 221 East Main Street Roynd Rock, TX 78664-5299 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DIDMNBE0 POMO'!" BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE MAMMON OATS TIWI0OF, soma VM.L SE DBJVFAE0 N ACCORDANCE WRN THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESSIDATNE Thomas 7. Ashley/CANDY -�i `7 - ACORD 26 (2010105) 019811-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Exhibit E RM 620 from Deepwood Drive to IH 35 April 2014 EXECUTED ORIGINAL DOCUMEN1S FOLLOW STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FIRM: Halff Associates, Inc. ADDRESS: 4030 W. Braker Lane, Suite 450, Austin, TX 78759 ("Engineer") PROJECT: RM 620 Safety Improvements Project — Design Phase This Supplemental Contract No. 1 to Contract for Engineering Services is made by and between the City of Round Rock, Texas, hereinafter called the "City" and 1-Ialff Associates, Inc., hereinafter called the "Engineer". WHEREAS, the City and Engineer executed a Contract for Engineering Services, hereinafter called the "Contract", on the 27th day of June, 2013 for the RM 620 Safety Improvements Project — Design Phase Project in the amount of $955,823.00; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to amend the Contract to modify the provisions for the scope of services and to increase the compensation by $698,445.00 to a total of $1,654,268.00; NOW THEREFORE, premises considered, the City and the Engineer agree that said Contract is amended as follows: I. Article 1, City Services and Exhibit A, City Services shall be amended as set forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit A. II. Article 2, Engineering Services and Exhibit B, Engineering Services shall be amended as set forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit B. Exhibit C, Work Schedule shall be amended as set forth in the attached Addendum To Exhibit C. Article 4, Compensation and Exhibit D, Fee Schedule shall be amended by increasing by $698,445.00 the lump sum amount payable under the Contract for a total of $1,654,268.00, as shown by the attached Addendum to Exhibit D. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Engineer have executed this Supplemental Contract in duplicate. Supplemental Contract 0199.1315; 00297202 R-2014-1397 1 Rev. 12/01/08 84275 HALF'? ASSOCIATES, INC. By: �� cc Vic Pve5oJ,n&4 er Date 44tirLoi4— CITY O OUND ROCK By: rn ./t - Alan McGraw, Mayor Date Supplemental Contract 0199.1315; 00297202 2 APPROVED FORM: Wtun Ql1,MM61 61"-}ij krimoij Rev. 1 2/01 /08 84275 ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT A CITY SERVICES The City will furnish to the Engineer the following information and/or perform the following tasks: • Provide a tax exemption form for the purchase of taxable goods and services. • Post and pay for notices in local publications. • Post and maintain project information on City website, as appropriate. • Review Engineer 's plan and submittals, and cost estimates. • Assist the Engineer in obtaining property rights -of -entry for ground surveys and environmental investigations. • Support project development with external stakeholders such as TxDOT, other agencies, and property owners. • Assist the Engineer, as needed, in obtaining data and information from the State, County, and/or other franchise utility companies. • Coordinate and communicate project items and progress to other city departments, as appropriate. Exhibit A RM 620 Safety Improvements — Design Phase Page 1 of 1 ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT B ENGINEERING SERVICES GENERAL PROJECT OVERVIEW For the scope of services for this Work Authorization the Engineer shall provide engineering, surveying, and other professional services to develop 60% Plans Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) and complete right-of-way (ROW) and easement parcels for the RM 620 Safety Improvements from Deepwood Drive to IH 35 in accordance with the preliminary design schematic developed for the project under the professional services contract per city council Resolution No. R -10-10-2810E5. See enclosed Project Location Map. The purpose of the proposed project is to improve safety and enhance mobility in the project area. The project includes a bridge to carry RM 620 traffic over the Union Pacific Railroad and Chisholm Trail Road. In order to maintain access to businesses and residences, at -grade local access roads are proposed between Lake Creek Drive and Chisholm Trail Road. A second bridge is proposed at Lake Creek Drive. This proposed bridge would carry RM 620 traffic over Lake Creek Drive. The project area is within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. For this phase of the contract, PS&E will be developed to a 60% completion level. Contract Tasks shall include: Project Management; Roadway Design; Drainage Design; Water Quality Design; Water and Wastewater Relocation Design; Signing, Pavement Markings, and Traffic Signal Design; Miscellaneous Design (TCP, Illumination, Bridge, Ret Walls, Landscape and Irrigation); Environmental Site Remediation; Utility Coordination; and Public Involvement Tasks are more specifically described in the following Task Outline. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 1 of 20 Project Location Map RM 620 From Deepw ood Drive to IM K City of Round Rock Williamson County Ra - eumngs Pro}ed +I 5 e OCPC COO HALFF Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 2 of 20 TASK OUTLINE I. PROJECT MANAGEMENT A. PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1. Project Administration - The Engineer will: • Assign Eric Ratzman (a licensed PE in Texas) to serve as the Project Manager and point of contact for the city. He may not be replaced without written consent from the city of Round Rock. The Project Manager shall communicate with the city's assigned project manager. • Create and submit monthly invoices in required city format. • Prepare monthly progress reports for submission with the invoices to provide a written account of the progress made to date on the project. • Prepare project meeting summaries for applicable meetings during the project development process. • Keep records of project correspondence and make such records available to the city as needed. 2. Sub -consultant Management - The Engineer will: • Prepare and execute contracts with sub -consultants, monitor sub - consultants activities (staff and schedule), complete monthly reports and review and recommend approval of sub -consultant invoices. • Conduct internal meetings with the consultant design team every two weeks for the length of the project. Meetings will include key personnel from each discipline and will discuss and resolve project issues. • Coordinate and review subconsultant work activities and submittals. The Engineer will review and coordinate work of sub -consultants to ensure quality products are delivered to the City. The Engineer will also be responsible for the consistency and coordination between plans developed by each sub -consultant on the design team. 3. Coordination- The Engineer will: • Establish and attend periodic progress meetings (approximately once a month) with the city and TxDOT. • Meet with City staff as required through the project development process. • Coordinate with outside agencies as detailed below. II. SITE CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND ARCHITECTURAL MODIFICATIONS Excluded from this scope (and is to be provided by separate contract). III. ROADWAY DESIGN (60%) A. ROADWAY PLANS 1. TXDOT Submittals a. Engineer will prepare and submit forms for TxDOT reviews, processing, and letting including Form 1002, stage gate checklists, PS&E checklists, and Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 3 of 20 others. The Engineer will develop the following roadway plan sheets: 2. MISCELLANEOUS PLANS. a. Project Title Sheet. b. Detailed Index of Sheets. c. Project Layout sheets at a scale of 1"=200'. 3. ROADWAY PLANS and GEOMETRY a. Existing and Proposed Typical Sections. b. Roadway Plan and Profile Sheets at 1"=50' Horizontally. c. Survey Control Plan Sheets. d. Horizontal Alignment Data Sheets. e. Superelevation Data Sheets f. Removal Plans 4. GRADING AND DETAILS. a. Develop and plot design cross sections for RM 620 at 50 even foot stations for final pavement conditions. Cross sections will be plotted on plan sheets and included as a separate plan set for contractor information. b. Intersection layout sheets for intersections. c. Driveway Detail Sheets. d. Miscellaneous Roadway Detail Sheets. B. DRAINAGE DESIGN (60%) 1. Storm Sewer Design a. Produce Interior Drainage Area Maps at 1"=100' scale b. Calculate Storm Drain Calculations and design using GEOPAK DRAINAGE software and TxDOT Drainage Design Criteria c. Produce drainage plans and profiles at 1"=50' scale d. Design temporary drainage facilities for the phased construction 2. SW3P and Erosion Control Plans C. WATER QUALITY DESIGN (60%) 1. Water Quality Facility Design (for Edward's Aquifer Recharge Zone) a. Project Setup and Data Review Perform a geologic assessment: Engineer will obtain and review available data on the existing and proposed roadway design and site geology, including engineering plans and geologic reports. An initial field visit will be conducted in order to inspect the site and identify and evaluate potential locations for water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs). b. Pollutant Removal Calculations and Design of Water Quality BMPs Engineer will perform the required total suspended solids (TSS) pollutant load calculations and update design of water quality facilities, such as the extended detention ponds proposed in the 30% design plans. Best Management Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 4 of 20 Practices will be designed according to the TCEQ's technical guidance manual complying with the Edwards Aquifer Rules — Technical Guidance on Best Management Practices (RG -348, July 2005) and addenda. The location of temporary erosion and sedimentation controls designed to prevent discharges of polluted runoff from the project site during construction will be evaluated to ensure compliance with TCEQ Edwards Aquifer requirements. The design of temporary controls, including an erosion and sedimentation control plan, will be included as part of the contractor's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW3P). This task will include coordination with TxDOT and preliminary consultation meeting with TCEQ. The WPAP will be prepared/submitted in the final phase of plan development. D. WATER AND WASTEWATER RELOCATION DESIGN (60%) ENGINEER will perform engineering services within the described project area to prepare plans, specifications, and estimates for relocation of City of Round Rock water and wastewater lines within the project limits. The wastewater lines vary in size from 8 to 12 inch and the waterlines range from 6 to 12 inch. Project will include various crossings/bores, services and appurtenances. 1. 60% Water & Wastewater Replacement Design per the City of Round Rock Design and Construction Standards a. Dimension control b. Utility alignment & layout c. Line size determination as directed by the City of Round Rock d. Water and wastewater plan and profile sheets. Profile all waterlines greater than but not including 8". Provide profiles for any size waterline at roadway crossings. Profile all proposed wastewater lines. e. Prepare engineers estimate of probable construction cost f. Schedule an on the ground walk through with the City project manager to look at constructability, possible problem areas for construction, etc. 60% Water & Wastewater PS&E Deliverables: • Provide plan and profile drawings indicating horizontal and vertical alignment of proposed facilities (with 30% comments addressed) • Provide updated cost estimates E. SIGNING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN (60%) 1. Provide small sign and pavement marking layout plans at 1"=50' scale 2. Signalization Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 5 of 20 a. Engineer will develop traffic signal plans for permanent mast arm signals at the intersections of RM 620 with Deepwood Dr., Lake Creek Dr., and IH 35 SBFR. The signal plans will be prepared at a scale of 1"=40'. Engineer will design the signal plans to a 60% completion to obtain a reasonable cost estimate for all the signal work on this project. Engineer will include following sheets for the submittal: (i) Existing Conditions sheets will show locations of existing traffic control devices, and underground, and overhead utilities at each intersection, from the survey data. (ii)Signal Layout sheets will show the locations of proposed signal poles, pedestrian poles, signal heads, communication equipment, electrical conduits, ground boxes, signal cabinet, new electrical service, existing utilities, right of way, and proposed roadway improvements. Locations of pedestrian poles and pedestrian access ramps will be designed in conformance with ADA requirements. The plans will include audible pedestrian signal head units at every pedestrian crossing. Due to lateral and vertical clearance required from an overhead electric line (per the State law), the Engineer will coordinate with the City before finalizing locations of signal poles. (iii) Signal Elevation sheets will show placement of signal heads on each mast -arm and vertical clearance required for the mast -arm. (b) Coordinate design with city and TxDOT traffic signal reviewers including up to three (3) meetings with reviewers regarding signal modifications. F. MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY 1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS a. The Engineer will develop overview plans for each stage of the traffic control plan. These plans will act as key maps for each phase of TCP and shall be developed at a 1"=500' scale in order to depict the full project on one sheet. The traffic control for this project consists of five (5) major phases. The overview plans will depict the boundaries of each layout sheet and proposed construction areas. b. The Engineer will prepare 1"=500' plan layouts of all advance warning signs for RM 620, IH 35 and all cross streets. c. The Engineer will prepare a detailed narrative for the sequence of construction and traffic control general notes to submit to the City for review and incorporation into the plans. The narrative will include a phase -by -phase description of the major construction activities. This is intended to be a narrative account of the activities shown in the traffic control plans. d. The Engineer will prepare traffic control typical sections for each phase / step of the construction sequence to clearly delineate the position of traffic and barriers with respect to the proposed construction. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 6 of 20 e. The Engineer will prepare detailed traffic control plans at a scale of 1"=100'. These plans will be developed based on the City's approval of the conceptual plans developed at the 30% PS&E level. This plan will describe the maintenance of traffic and sequence of work for each phase of the proposed construction. Detour alignments, location of work areas, temporary paving, temporary shoring, signing, barricades and other details will be required to describe the traffic control plan. The Engineer will ensure that proper drainage can be maintained during each phase of construction. f. The Engineer will prepare detour layouts at a scale of 1"=100' H and 1"=10' V showing plan & profiles where needed to define the geometry for detours used in the traffic control plans. When widening is required that can be defined based on existing pavement slopes, a detour profile will not be prepared. g. The Engineer will prepare profiles for temporary shoring required during construction sequencing at a scale of 1"=100' H and 1"=10' V. Existing ground and top of shoring will be depicted on these sheets. Existing ground and top of shoring elevations will be indicated at 50 feet intervals. 2. ILLUMINATION a. The Engineer will prepare detailed layouts at a scale of 1"=100' depicting safety lighting for the gores of the ramps and the roundabout and underpass lighting for the bridges at the UPRR / Chisholm Trail Road and at Lake Creek Drive. b. The Engineer will identify potential overhead utility conflicts, and coordinate with the State and the utility company to help resolve the conflicts. 3. RETAINING WALLS a. The Engineer will provide a location plan of all walls at a scale of 1 "=200'. The intent is to show the location of all walls in plan including the wall designation and beginning and ending stations. b. The Engineer will update layouts for fifteen (15) retaining walls based on review comments and completion of the project design. The layouts will show plan and profile views of the retaining walls at a maximum scale of 1 "=40'. c. The Engineer will update typical sections for retaining walls based on review comments and completion of the project design. d. The Engineer will prepare soil nail layouts at a maximum of 1"=10' scale. The layout will provide location of soil nails in elevation view at a maximum scale of 1"=10'. e. The Engineer will prepare structural design details for non-proprietary wall designs (i.e., soil nail) required for the project. It is anticipated that one of the retaining walls on the project will be non-proprietary. f. The Engineer will prepare aesthetic details based on the approved conceptual aesthetic theme from the City. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 7 of 20 4. BRIDGE LAYOUTS & DESIGN The grade separation on RM 620 at Lake Creek Drive is anticipated to be a two span overpass structure with two lanes both in eastbound and westbound directions. The grade separation on RM 620 at the existing UPRR track and Chisholm Trail Road is anticipated to be a five span overpass structure with two lanes in the westbound direction and three lanes in the eastbound direction. a. The Engineer will update preliminary bridge layouts (1"=40') and typical sections for the UPRR Overpass and for the Lake Creek Drive Overpass based on review comments and as needed for completion of the project design. The Engineer will complete the above described layout for each overpass. The bridge layouts shall include: Plan View (i) Horizontal curve data (ii) Bearing of centerline (iii) Bridge skew angles (iv) Control stations at the begin and end of structures (v) Dimensioned widths of bridge, roadway, shoulders and sidewalks (vi) Limits of riprap (if required) (vii) North arrow (viii) Cross slope and super elevation data (ix) Railing type (x) Bent stations and bearings (xi) Retaining wall locations (xii) Approach pavement crown width (xiii) Typical bridge section displaying beam type and spacing (xiv) Joint and seal type Profile View (i) Profile grade (ii) Vertical curve data (iii) Finished roadway elevation at begin/end of structure (iv) Overall length of structure (v) Existing and proposed ground lines clearly marked (vi) Profile view of grid elevations and stations (vii) Type of foundation, number, size and length of foundation elements (viii) Bent numbers (ix) Fixed or expansion condition at each beam end (x) Column heights (xi) Soil core data including penetrometer values and soil classification will be provided in Boring Log Sheets. (x) Any other information required in the TXDOT LRFD Bridge Design and Bridge Detailer's Manuals. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 8 of 20 b. The Engineer will perform detailed design and create custom bridge details for the Lake Creek and UPRR/Chisholm Trail Road Overpasses. Bridge design will be completed using 2013 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and HL 93 Loading. No detailed design work is to be performed until the State has given the Engineer approval of the preliminary bridge layouts. The Engineer will design and develop details for the following items for each of the structures: (i) Boring Logs (showing bridge profile with foundation tips) (ii) Estimated Quantities and Bearing Seat Elevations (i) Abutments (Details for one abutment only) (ii) Inverted T -Cap Interior Bents (Design only) (iii) Concrete I -Girder Spans (iv) I -Girder Design (v) Foundation Design (vi) Miscellaneous Bent Details (for both bridges) (vii) Bridge Aesthetic Theme and Features Details (for both bridges) c. The Engineer will list the necessary TxDOT Statewide Standards for inclusion in the 60% contract plan set. d. 60% Deliverables: • Bridge Layout • Foundation Boring Log • Estimated Quantities and Bearing Seat Elevations • Abutment Details • Interior Bent Details • Form Liner Details for Column • Beam Layout • Concrete Beam Unit Details • Miscellaneous Bent Details • IGND Bridge Girder Design • Bridge Standards 5. RAILROAD COORDINATION AND EXHIBIT 'A' Engineer will update Railroad Exhibit 'A' documents based on TxDOT and UPRR review comments to 30% submittal. 6. AMENITIES, LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION (60%) a. Coordinate preparation of bridge and retaining wall plans with engineering staff, to depict the desired design character and themes for retaining walls and bridge structures on the project. Coordination efforts to include preparation of sketch designs to be implemented into wall and structures plans by engineering and structural design staff. b. Provide design concepts for other amenity improvements for the project, including special signage, iconic elements, gateway features, special light Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 9 of 20 fixtures or other amenity components, for implementation within the plan sets of other engineering and design professionals working on the project. c. Conduct research with appropriate city staff to determine quantity of new tree plantings required to mitigate tree removals caused by the project. 7. QUANTITIES a. The Engineer will calculate quantities for each of the following and as necessary to provide an Engineer's estimate of probable cost: (i) Roadway Plans (ii) Removal Plans (iii) Drainage Plans (iv) Water Quality Plans (v) Water and Wastewater Relocation Plans (vi) Signs, pavement markings, and signals (vii) Traffic Control Plans (viii) Illumination Plans (ix) Retaining Wall Plans (x) Bridge Plans 8. STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE a. The Engineer will identify the appropriate TxDOT standards for the project. Standards that require modification will be revised and sealed by the Engineer. The Engineer will utilize TxDOT Austin District standards when applicable. b. The Engineer will work with City and TxDOT to complete the basis of estimate prior to beginning quantity calculations. c. The Engineer will prepare an opinion of probable construction cost at the 60% submittal. IV. UTILITY COORDINATION AND ENGINEERING: The Engineer shall perform all Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE), Utility Coordination, and Utility Engineering services for approximately eleven (11) utilities as listed below: Underground • AT&T — Telephone • AT&T — Fiber Optic Cable • Grande Communications — Fiber Optic Cable • MCI (Verizon Business) — Fiber Optic Cable • TW Telecom — Fiber Optic Cable • City of Round Rock — Water • City of Round Rock — Wastewater • Time Warner Cable — Cable TV • Atmos Energy — Gas • Oncor Electric Delivery — Electric • LCRA — Electric Transmission Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 10 of 20 The work to be performed by the Engineer under this contract shall consist of providing engineering services required for SUE, Utility Coordination and Utility Engineering on the RM 620 Roadway PS&E Project. The existing utility file will be referenced into the current roadway design sheets to create a test hole location work plan. Based on the review of existing utilities and proposed roadway design sheets, approximately 20 test holes will be required. A sketch of the area to be included for the proposed test hole locations "Level A" will be provided prior to the start of the work and must be approved by the City of Round Rock. These services include SUE, utility adjustment coordination activities including but not limited to, meeting and contact with utilities on the project, initial project notifications, preparation of existing utility layouts, providing progress reports, preparation of contact lists, reviewing conflicts between the utilities and the proposed project, resolutions of utility conflicts, creation of a utility conflict list, agreement/permit coordination and review, review of the proposed utility adjustments, and recommending the proposed locations of the utility adjustments. The above list of services is general in nature and should not be considered inclusive to the engineer's responsibilities, as listed in the following scope. 1. Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) including utility investigations subsurface and above ground prepared in accordance with AASHTO standards [ASCE C-1 38- 02] and Utility Quality Levels as follows. i. Utility Quality Levels are defined in cumulative order (least to greatest) as follows: a. Quality Level D - Existing Records: Utilities are plotted from review of available existing records. b. Quality Level C - Surface Visible Feature Survey: Quality level "D" information from existing records is correlated with surveyed surface -visible features. Includes Quality Level D information. If there are variances in the designated work area of Level D then a new schematic or plan layout, if needed, is required showing the limits of the proposed project and limits of the work area required for this work authorization; including highway stations, limits within existing or proposed right of way, additional areas outside the proposed right of way, and distances or areas to be included down existing intersecting roadways. c. Quality Level B - Designate: Two-dimensional horizontal mapping. This information is obtained through the application and interpretation of appropriate non-destructive surface geophysical methods. Utility indications are referenced to established survey control. Incorporates quality levels C and D information to produce Quality Level B. If there are variances in the designated work area of Level D then a new schematic or plan layout, if needed, is required showing the limits of the proposed project and limits of the work area required for this work authorization; including highway stations, limits within existing or proposed right of way, additional areas outside the proposed right of way, and distances or areas to be included down existing intersecting roadways. d. Quality Level A - Locate (Test Hole): Three-dimensional mapping and other characterization data. This information is obtained through exposing utility facilities through test holes and measuring and recording (to appropriate survey control) utility/environment data. Incorporates quality levels B, C and D information to produce Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 11 of 20 Quality Level A. ii. Subsurface Utility Locate (Test Hole) Service (Quality Level A) (Up to 20 Test Holes), Locate means to obtain precise horizontal and vertical position, material type, condition, size and other data that may be obtainable about the utility facility and its surrounding environment through exposure by non-destructive excavation techniques that ensures the integrity of the utility facility. Subsurface Utility Locate (Test Hole) Services (Quality Level A) are inclusive of Quality Levels B, C, and D. The Engineer shall: a. Review requested test hole locations and advise the City of Round Rock in the development of an appropriate locate (test hole) work plan relative to the existing utility infrastructure and proposed highway design elements. b. Coordinate with utility owner inspectors as may be required by law or utility owner policy. c. Neatly cut and remove existing pavement material, such that the cut not to exceed 0.10 square meters (1.076 square feet) unless unusual circumstances exist. d. Measure and record the following data on an appropriately formatted test hole data sheet that has been sealed and dated by the Engineer: i. • Elevation of top and/or bottom of utility tied to the datum of the furnished plan. ii. Identify a minimum of two benchmarks utilized. Elevations shall be within an accuracy of 15mm (.591 inches) of utilized benchmarks. iii. Elevation of existing grade over utility at test hole location. iv. Horizontal location referenced to project coordinate datum. v. Outside diameter of pipe or width of duct banks and configuration of non-encased multi-conduit systems. vi. Utility facility material(s). vii. Utility facility condition. viii. Pavement thickness and type. ix. Coating/ Vrapping information and condition. x. Unusual circumstances or field conditions. e. Excavate test holes in such a manner as to prevent any damage to wrappings, coatings, cathodic protection or other protective coverings and features. f. Be responsible for any damage to the utility during the locating process. In the event of damage, the Engineer shall stop work, notify the appropriate utility facility owner, City of Round Rock, and appropriate regulatory agencies. The regulatory agencies include, but are not limited to the Railroad Commission of Texas and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. The Engineer will not resume work until the utility facility owner has determined the corrective action to be taken. The Engineer shall be liable for costs involved in the repair or replacement of the utility facility. g. Back fill excavations with appropriate material, compact backfill by mechanical means, and restore pavement and surface material. The Engineer shall be responsible for the integrity of the backfill and surface restoration for a period of three years. Install a marker Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 12 of 20 ribbon throughout the backfill. h. Furnish and install a permanent above ground marker directly above center line of the utility facility. i. Provide complete restoration of work site and landscape to equal or better condition than before excavation. If a work site and landscape is not appropriately restored, the Engineer shall return to correct the condition at no extra charge to the City of Round Rock. j. Plot utility location position information to scale. 2. Utility Adjustment Coordination including utility coordination meetings with individual utility companies, communication and coordination with utilities, and preparation and review of utility agreements/permits. i. The Utility Coordinator shall perform utility coordination and liaison activities with involved utility owners, their consultants, and the City of Round Rock to achieve timely project notifications, formal coordination meetings, conflict analysis and resolution. a. The Utility Coordinator shall coordinate all activities with the City of Round Rock, or their designee, to facilitate the orderly progress and timely completion of the design phase. The Utility Coordinator will be responsible for the following: a. The Utility Coordinator shall provide initial project notification letters to all affected utility companies, owners, and other concerned parties, if needed. b. The Utility Coordinator shall provide the City of Round Rock and all affected utility companies and owners a Utility Contact List for each project with all information such as: (a) Owner's Name; (b) Contact Person; (c) Telephone Numbers; (d) Emergency Contact Number; (e) E-mail addresses; (f) as well as all pertinent information concerning their respective affected utilities and facilities, including but not limited to: size, number of poles, material, and other information which readily identifies the utilities companies' facilities. c. The Utility Coordinator shall advise utility companies and owners of the general characteristics of the Project and provide an illustration of the project footprint for mark-up of the utility facility locations that occupy the project area. ii. The Utility Coordinator shall coordinate which utilities will conflict with highway construction or the "Utility Accommodation Rules" (UAR), and make the utility company aware of these conflicts. The Utility Coordinator shall assist the utility companies in the preparation of required agreements associated with the funding of adjustments and the occupation of state right of way; 2. Utility Agreement Assemblies: A packaged agreement consisting of a Utility Joint Use Acknowledgement, Standard Utility Agreements, Plans on 11x17 sheets, Statement of contract work form, Affidavit form and copy of recorded easement, schedule of work and various attachments as detailed in the UAR and the State's Utility Manual. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 13 of 20 a. Utility Agreements (3 estimated for this project): If a utility is located within an easement, the utility company may have a compensable interest. The utility company must furnish a copy of their easement to the Utility Coordinator. The Utility Coordinator shall determine whether or not a compensable interest exists and the owner's degree of eligibility. The Utility Coordinator shall assist the utility company with adjustment plans and cost estimate for these adjustments. The Utility Coordinator shall review plans to ensure compliance with UAR and to ensure that the proposal will not conflict with highway construction. The Utility Coordinator will submit a copy of the easement, plans, and estimate to the City of Round Rock by letter recommending approval. The utility should be reimbursed all cost incurred within their easement limits for replacement in kind. b. Utility Permits (8 estimated for this project): For this project, all Non -Reimbursable Utility Adjustments shall be submitted with the form Notice of Proposed Installation (Form 1082). The Utility Coordinator will furnish the appropriate form to the utility company and assist them with adjustment plan preparation. The utility company should submit the Utility Permit and adjustment plans to the Utility Coordinator for review. The Utility Coordinator shall review plans to ensure compliance with UAR and to ensure that the proposal will not conflict with highway construction. The Utility company will submit the Utility Permit and PS&E to TxDOT through their on-line system. c. The Utility Coordinator will submit the required number of executed copies of the Utility Agreement assemblies, which include the appropriate Forms as detailed in the UAR, a copy of the recorded easement Deed, plans, and estimate to the City of Round Rock by letter recommending approval. The Transmittal letter should include the following statement "The proposed utility adjustment will not conflict with proposed highway construction and will comply with UAR. The utility should be reimbursed eligible costs incurred within their easement limits for replacement in kind." The transmittal should also provide a description of the work being done as well as the estimated cost and schedule of work. d. The Utility Coordinator shall be solely responsible for determining which utilities will be installed by "Permit", or by "Agreement". e. The Engineer shall maintain a complete set of records for all Utility Adjustment Costs for each Utility for a period of time sufficient to complete all final payments to the utility companies or owners. 3. Utility Engineering including the identification of utility conflicts, compliance with Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 14 of 20 TxDOT's UAR, and resolution of utility conflicts. The Engineer shall coordinate all activities with the City of Round Rock, or their designee, to facilitate the orderly progress and timely completion of the design phase. Coordination of engineering activities include: a. Utility Layout: The Engineer shall maintain a utility layout in the latest version of Microstation used by the City of Round Rock. This layout shall include existing utilities which are to remain in place or be abandoned, and adjusted utilities. This layout will be utilized to monitor the necessity and evaluate alternatives. The Engineer will utilize the layout of existing utilities as prepared, if available, and make a determination of the following; i. Facilities in conflict with the proposed project that are to be relocated. ii. Facilities to be abandoned in place. iii. Facilities to remain in service and in place. iv. The Engineer shall be responsible for determining if there are additional facilities, not shown in the Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) documents, which require relocation. The Engineer shall coordinate this information with the City of Round Rock immediately upon discovery. b. Public & Individual Meetings with Utility Companies and the City of Round Rock as required, to facilitate utility conflict identification and resolution (approximately 4 public utility meetings and 22 individual utility meetings). c. Progress Meetings: Meet with the City of Round Rock periodically to coordinate the work effort and resolve problems and prepare a written report of such meetings. The meetings will review: i. Activities completed since the last meeting ii. Problems encountered. iii. Late activities. iv. Activities required by the next progress meeting. v. Solutions for unresolved and/or anticipated problems. vi. Information or items required from other agencies/consultants. vii. Review of Utility's Proposed Adjustments viii. Evaluate Alternatives: The Engineer will evaluate alternatives in the adjustment of utilities balancing the needs of both the City of Round Rock and the Utility. ix. Review Estimates and Schedules: The Engineer will review the utility adjustment estimates for reasonableness of cost and the timely scheduling of the adjustment. x. Review Plans for compliance with TxDOT's UAR and proposed location data. The responsibility for quality and accuracy of Utility adjustment plans will remain with the Utility Company. d. Prepare a Proposed Utility Layout in the latest version of MicroStation used by the City of Round Rock that can be overlaid on the base file and determine the following; i. All facilities conflicts have been resolved. ii. All stakeholders have concurred with the various alignments. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 15 of 20 iii. Establish the sequence of construction for utility relocation work. iv. Determine which utilities will be built as part of the contract. v. Determine which facilities will be relocated prior to construction. e. Review PS&E for utilities including the ones in the construction contract. Deliverables: • Two (2) Existing Utility Layouts (11"x17") signed and sealed by a Texas Professional Engineer & 2 CDs-Microstation compatible containing DGN files in US feet (2D) format, .pdf format, and scanned record information in .pdf format if received from each utility • Two (2) Test Hole Data Sheets signed and sealed by a Texas Professional Engineer & 2 CDs-Microstation compatible containing DGN files in US feet (2D) format and .pdf format • Utility Contact List • Potential Conflict Analysis Spreadsheet • Two (2) Proposed Utility Layouts (11"x17") signed and sealed by a Texas Professional Engineer & 2 CDs-Microstation compatible containing DGN files in US feet (2D) format and .pdf format • Meeting minutes (delivered electronically) for approximately 4 meetings • Utility Agreements/Permits V. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Environmental — Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Support and Salamander Assessments The City of Round Rock is considering the use of federal funds for reimbursement of right-of-way acquisition for this project, which may trigger the need for consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) related to the endangered Bone Cave Harvestman (Texella reyesi; BCH) and the threatened Jollyville Plateau salamander (Eurycea tonkawae; JPS). Both species are known to occur in the vicinity of the project area; although, our prior investigations determined that the BCH is not likely to be taken by the proposed project. This proposal also includes additional field investigations and analysis pertaining to the JPS, which was added to the federal endangered species list in September 2013. 1. Jollyville Plateau Salamander Presence/Absence Investigation/Survey a. The project is located in close proximity to a stretch of Brushy Creek that may or may not be occupied by the JPS. The species is known to occur in spring runs located both upstream and downstream of the project within the Brushy Creek drainage basin and additional habitat may occur elsewhere in the basin. One minor spring was located adjacent to the project (but not within the project limits) during the geologic assessment study conducted by SWCA in 2013. Additionally, Brushy Creek is a gaining stream in the project area due to multiple areas of discharge from Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 16 of 20 the Edwards Aquifer. These factors indicate that habitat may be present in close proximity to the project. b. Under this task the Engineer will conduct a presence/absence investigation for the JPS both within the spring and the main channel of Brushy Creek. We propose to incorporate the USFWS's draft protocols for conducting such surveys, which require at least 20 survey visits under suitable conditions and drift netting or bottle trapping at the spring outlet or spring run to infer absence. Our sampling method for the spring and shallow areas of Brushy Creek will conform to visual encounter survey methods used by Pierce (Pierce et al. 2010) for other Eurycea sites in Williamson County. Passive sampling will also be conducted. Following active surveys bottle traps will be placed in Brushy Creek and left for a minimum of three days before being recovered and searched for Eurycea specimens. If encountered, individual salamanders will be photo documented. Temporary capture and release may be required for photo documentation; no specimens will be collected permanently. To date, no investigators have been permitted by the USFWS for conducting such surveys. This scope assumes that our application for a USFWS Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit authorizing work with the JPS will be approved prior to the beginning of the suitable sampling season, or that other temporary authorization may be granted. Right of entry will also be required to access the spring. Being a navigable stream, Brushy Creek itself is accessible without explicit right -of -entry according to state law. • Deliverables: A report presenting the results of our investigations will be provided. The report format and content will conform to the reporting requirement of the USFWS's draft JPS sampling protocols and must be provided to the USFWS. 2. Jollyville Plateau Salamander Impacts Assessment a. The proposed project occurs within the known range of the JPS upstream of designated Critical Habitat Unit 2. Under this task Engineer, will conduct an assessment of the potential for adverse effects to the JPS and for adverse modification of designated critical habitat resulting from the proposed project. The assessment will consider Edwards Aquifer hydrogeology, site-specific habitat and occupancy conditions (based on the results of Task 1), applicable water quality standards, and potential contaminant pathways between the project and known salamander locations • Deliverables: A report presenting the results of our analysis and professional opinions on the likelihood of potential effects will be provided 3. Biological Assessment and Section 7 Consultation Support a. The need for this task will ultimately depend on the results of the JPS work in Tasks 1 and 2; if the federal funding agencies determine that the project will have "no effect" on either listed species then no consultation will be necessary. This scope and budget assumes that the City of Round Rock will accept federal funding for the project and that construction activities "may affect" the BCH or JPS, or both. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 17 of 20 b. Engineer will prepare a Biological Assessment (BA) on behalf of the federal funding agency of the expected impacts of construction on the BCH and JPS. The BA will also be required to address the potential for impacts to other federally listed and proposed species occurring in the project region; the list of species to be addressed in the BA will be developed through coordination with the USFWS. Any required field data are expected to be available as a result of the completion of prior environmental investigations, including the tasks above. The BA will address both the direct and cumulative impacts to federally listed and proposed species that are expected to result from construction and operation of the project. c. Section 7 provides for both an informal and formal consultation process, based on the likelihood for significant adverse effects that are generally considered to be equivalent to "take". If take can be avoided, then an informal consultation with USFWS may be possible and is likely to involve no more than three coordination meetings and a letter of concurrence from the USFWS. If a formal consultation is warranted, our recent experience indicates that significant agency coordination is likely, including several rounds of comment and response on the draft BA and related USFWS Biological Opinion (BO) between interested parties potentially including the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Austin District, TxDOT Environmental Affairs, the USFWS, Federal Highways Administration, City of Round Rock, and others. The formal consultation process is concluded with the USFWS issuing a BO with an incidental take statement and required reasonable and prudent measures to minimize impacts to the affected species. • Deliverables: Draft BA for client and federal funding agency review; followed by a final BA for consultation with USFWS. Meeting summaries and comment responses as necessary to document the process. B. Federal Categorical Exclusion Address the classification of the project as a Federal Categorical Exclusion (CE), and the federal listing of the Jollyville Plateau salamander. The project will need to be processed as Federal Categorical Exclusion (CE) due to new federal funding available for right-of-way reimbursement. The environmental process will follow guidance published on February 12, 2014 regarding Categorical Exclusion (CE) determinations. The project is considered a "d -list" project based on 23 CFR 771.117(d): 3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction or replacement of the construction of grade separation to replace existing at -grade bridge crossing. As of February 2014, federal CE approval has been delegated by FHWA to TxDOT. The TxDOT Austin District will be responsible for certifying the CE. 1. Environmental Management and Documentation Halff will be responsible for daily management of the environmental tasks and documents. Including: Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 18 of 20 a. Coordinate the daily environmental study activities of the project b. Participate in conference calls and meetings with the City and TxDOT 2. Restatement of Project Scope The Engineer will prepare a Project Scope (version February 2014), that will outline deliverables for the project and planned agency coordination. The City of Round Rock and TxDOT Austin District will sign the Project Scope once approved. 3. Cultural Resources (Archeology and Historic Structures) — Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Perform additional Section 106 survey for cultural resources due to the federal classification of this project. Revised archeological and historic resources reports will be prepared and submitted for Texas Historical Commission/SHPO consultation. The Engineer will coordinate with the subconsultant, review reports, and submit reports to TxDOT for review and agency coordination. This task assumes coordination with the Texas Historical Commission initiated by the TxDOT Environmental Affairs Division. Section 106 requires coordination with local entities regarding their historic preservation. TxDOT will initiate agency coordination with the Williamson County Historical Commission. a. Project Coordination . Request, Cultural Resources Background Study Report, and NEPA Text Engineer will review the existing files held by the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory (TARL) and the Texas Historical Commission (THC) to determine if any previously recorded cultural resource sites or archeological surveys occur within or near the proposed project area. The location of any previously recorded sites and surveys will be plotted onto USGS 7.5-minute topographic maps for use in the compliance coordination process. Archeologists will also consult the USDA NRCS soil survey maps for Williamson County, relevant aerial photography, historical maps, land use maps, and the Geologic Atlas of Texas in order to assess the likelihood for unrecorded archeological resources and make recommendations regarding the need for further field surveys. The results of this effort will be integrated into a background study report that conforms to TxDOT's Standards of Uniformity (SOUs) for Archeological Background Studies for review and comment by TxDOT- ENV b. Archeological Field Survey and Survey Report If required by TxDOT, Engineer will develop an application for a Texas Antiquities Permit and submit it to TxDOT-ENV for review and processing. Upon issuance of the permit, the Engineer will conduct a field survey. Engineer will deploy a team of archeologists to conduct a pedestrian survey including shovel testing along the entire length of the proposed APE. Engineer will follow the THC requirement of 16 shovel tests per mile per transect. All excavated soil will be screened through %-inch mesh and all artifacts will be analyzed in the field and reburied; no artifacts will be collected. Sites (if any are discovered) will be delineated by digging additional manual shovel tests (no backhoe or mechanized equipment) and their locations will be Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase Page 19 of 20 documented by sub -meter GPS. Sites will be recorded on State of Texas archeological data sheets, photographed and sketch mapped. Backhoe trenching is not anticipated as part of this scope of work as it is assumed that soils will be shallow enough to assess using a shovel. • Deliverables: Engineer will prepare a professional report documenting the results of the fieldwork. The report will fully document all methods and results of the survey and will offer clear assessments of NRHP/SAL eligibility for all sites. The report will present explicit management recommendations for each site. The draft report will be presented in electronic format to Client for review and comment and upon approval will be submitted in hard copy for submission to TxDOT. Upon receipt of review comments, Engineer will prepare the final report and distribute these in compliance with the terms of the permit. The Engineer will perform the services Engineer's office(s) as listed below: Service Project Management and Engineering Utility Design and Coordination Sub -Consultants: CP&Y, Inc. (CPY) Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) SWCA Consultants (SWCA) AmaTerra Environmental, Inc. Exhibit B RM 620 Safety Improvements — 60% Design Phase to be provided under this agreement out of Office Location Halff Associates, Inc. 4030 West Braker Lane, Suite 450 Austin, TX 78759 Halff Associates, Inc. Two Sierra Way, Suite 105 Georgetown, TX 78626 Page 20 of 20 ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT C WORK SCHEDULE Halff Associates Inc. is prepared to continue work on this project immediately upon notice -to -proceed from the City of Round Rock. The proposed date for completion of services is May of 2015**. The proposed contract milestones are as follows: • Contract Award / Notice to Proceed: May 2014 • TASK I: Project Management: May 2014 - May 2015 • TASK II: Site Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Services (excluded) • TASK III: Roadway Design (60% PS&E) o Submittal of 60% PS&E for review: September 2014 • TASK IV: Utility Engineering and Coordination o Begin coordination with utility companies: May 2014 o Submittal of 60% PS&E to utility companies: September 2014 o Deadline for plans from utility companies: November 2014* o Review utility plans for conflict resolution: January 2014* o Finalize utility relocation plans: February 2014* o Utility agreements/permit: March 2014 thru May 2015* o Begin relocation work: Upon completion of ROW aquisition* • TASK V: Public Involvement and Environmental o Public Involvement coordination efforts on-going and as needed o Submit Sampling application to USFWS: May 2014 o Field Sampling Surveys: May thru July 2014 (contingent upon USFWS permit approval)** o Begin informal consultation with USFWS: July 2014 *Subject to cooperation and progress by third -party utility companies. ** Informal consultation with USFWS is anticipated to take at least 6 months. Formal consultation could take 18 months or more. Exhibit C RM 620 Safety Improvements — Final Design Phase CITY OF ROUND ROCK EXHIBIT " D " - RM 620 FINAL DESIGN EXHIBIT D - FEE SCHEDULE DIRECT TASK /DESCRIPTION LABOR COSTS PRINTING, PLOTTING DELIV, TRAVEL & MISC SUB CONSULTANTS TOTAL COST FOR TASK (INCL MULTS) FEE SUMMARY $37,940 $458,032 $114,780 $87,693 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $36,890 800 250 II SITE CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND ARCHITECTURAL MODS $200,890 $74,323- III ROADWAY DESIGN (100% PS&E) $257,142 IV UTILITY COORDINATION $89,780 $25,000 V ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $13,305 $20 $45 TOTAL FEE $397,117 $820 $25,295 $275,213 $698,445 463024b2-c299-4e6e-8cf9-835fe5a2368e.xlsx: Halff Associates Inc. 1 OF 1 ACOR ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT E INSURANCE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I oanpuiroccrrrn 07/10/2013 THIS CERTIFICATE 19 ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: N the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED. the policy(ies) must be endorsed. H SUBROGATION IS WANED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsemad(s} FRO0MO9l Belt Insurance Agency rag- Candy Goehring FNONEaMX 972.581.4915 11 2,0972.581.4916 16980 Gallas Parkway Dallas, TX 75248 rZircgoehring8beligruup.com NMMEIRalAMERCING COVERAGE Noce NMUBRA: Massachusetts Bay 22306 INaulwo Halff Associates, Inc. 1201 N. Bowser Richardson, TX 75081 uNsuaeha: Allmerica Financial Benefit 41840 ImmRERc: The Hanover Ins. Co. 22292 USUIMO: ACE American Ins. Co. 22667 INSURER 0: X Contractual Liab. REIMER F: $ 1,000,000 CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 13/14 Master SAIL Pro PHIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE SEEN ISSUED 7O THE INSURED NAIL ASOVE FOR THE POUCY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERMOR CONORION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIED HEREIN IS SUBJECT 7O ALLTHE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS ANO CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIWTS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAIO CLAMS. TIP TYPE W MEURANCE yam{ RIBA Iw,fI MUM NUMBERnNNGWYY POLICY TT L1MTe A i GENERAL LX LIABILITY cowweRcaLG8 LL nY -I .MOE © occUR ZDDA05127. 07/12/2413 07/122014 FPS . , EAcxoccummweS s 1,000,000 'sEtAlto' l 0 1,000,000 LEO EXP(Amono moon) $ 10,000 X Contractual Liab. PERSONAL It ROVIWURY $ 1,000,000 WAEWLAGGREGATE a 2,000,000 lJIT APPLES PER: GEM. AGGREGATE MIT —� POLICY f .r' 1-1 I Loc PRODUCTS. CGM40PAGG E 2 000,00) S B AInp10001 X Ism, _ X ,IECr LIAIAnY AUTO ALL ._ mimeo SCHEDULE° AUTOS �_ NONOYINEO MEOW= . WOOS • AWDAOS13000711212013 07/1220140� ' ! 'icbanj''''L11 BOCLYINJURY (Pr person) $ 1,000,000 E BO0LY INJURY (WN MGM) S PROPER IT MIVAGE iPvaccW.0 S $ C X UUaOe.LALUa X OCCUR excess use CUEM•MAOE UHDA05128707/1212013 07/122014I EACH occuoRENCE 8 5,000,000 i AGGREGATE S 5 , 000,000 oeoIXIRETENTION S 10,000; i B WORKERS CORPORATION AND eueLovenr MORAY YIN ..,�...� _ NIA? °FIM YOEnR AMER EROLUOED1 ~ © GYN, OEeCR OF OPERATIONS ONbe I 1 i W2DA02864007/122013 071122014' _0 X IToRY huklail I ER l6 EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 E.LOMEME EAEMPL s 1,000,000 1,000,000 EL.DISEASE-POLICY �S D Professional Liability Claims Made Policy EONG2167384507/12/2013 071122014 $5,000,000 Per Claim Limit $5,000,000 Aggregate Limit DESCRIPTION OP OPERATIONS) LOCATIONS )VENGLES LMLM1*CORO 101. MOWN RRTMIRSLRquM Doan spa. NnpokNO 1E: RM 620; 30 day notice of cancellation applies except for 10 days for non payment of premium .:eneral liability is primary non-contributory if required by written contract. REVISED 2-12-14 CANC City of Round Rock City Manager 221 East Main Street Round Rock, TX 78664-5299 MIMEO ANY OF THE MOM OpWa8D POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE TRE EXPIIM1IN DAtt TREMOR, NOTICE NMLL RE OM.IVEREO N ACCORDANCE MN THE POLICY PROVISIONS. MINORIZED REPRESENTATIVEA/t,__ ��•� Thomas 3. Ashley/CANDY__ ACORD 26 (2010/05) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Exhibit E RM 620 from Deepwood Drive to IH 35 April 2014