R-2018-5547 - 6/14/2018 RESOLUTION NO. R-2018-5547
WHEREAS, Section 395.058 of the Texas Local Government Code ("the Act") requires the
Capital Improvement Advisory Committee ("CIAC") to report to the City Council the progress of the
capital improvements plan and any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the
impact fee; and
WHEREAS, the CIAC is also required to advise the Council of the need to update the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plan and impact fees; and
WHEREAS, the CIAC has submitted a Capital Improvement Plan Progress Semi-Annual
Report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the attached Capital Improvement Plan Progress
Semi-Annual Report and has determined same to be in compliance with the Act,Now Therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS,
That the Capital Improvement Plan Progress Semi-Annual Report, attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein, is hereby approved.
The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and
subject of the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted was posted and that such meeting was
open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Resolution and the subject matter
hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act,
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended.
RESOLVED this 14th day of June, 2018.
CRAIG ORGPck.
ayor
City of ound Rexas
ATTEST:
L, A& -
-
SARA L. WHITE, City Clerk
0112.1804;00402411
EXHIBIT
Y
ROUND ROCK TEXAS
UTILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL.SERVICES
' ,.`.
Round
W :*
JL
urflives was En'viaron
IN
Services rent
Capital prove
SUMMARY
The Local Government Code Section 395.058 requires the Capital
Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC) to report to the political
subdivision the progress of the capital improvements plan and any
perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the impact
fee. Included herein is the semi-annual report for the reporting period
of October 1, 2017 to April 1, 2018. This report includes an updated
assessment of the actual growth rate in comparison to the projections
and assumptions made in the report; projects completed or initiated
during the period; and impact fees collected during the period. These
comparisons are used as indicators of the need to update the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plan or impact fees.
The local government code also requires the Capital Improvement
Advisory Committee to advise the City Council of the need to update the
land use assumptions, capital improvements plan and impact fees.
These items were last updated by the City in November 2015.
1 5/25/2018
Figure 1 represents Ground and Surface water use, along with the
number of active water services over the past two years. Although the
City continues to grow, the total water production has remained fairly
level over the past two years. Part of this reason could be because
water usage is dependent on weather patterns; however, the City's
conservation and reuse water programs are also affecting the amount
of potable water usage by the City. According to the Building Inspections
Division, the City typically processes about 300 permits per month. In
the first three months of 2018, they experienced a drastic increase in
permits processed which is reflected in active services for the 2nd
Quarter of FY-18.
Figure 1
Water Treatment Plant
2,5W 35
34.5
2,00
r
Cy 34
1,500 �
ft 33.5
u
V
V
- - -- to
0 at
+� 33
a- 1,000 ._.......
C
U
M 0
32.5
aC!
Soo
z
32
p ................................. ........ ........ ....................--. ,... . ............ ............. ... 315
Zr�d Qtr i Y .3rd Qtr�Y 4th Qtr FY 1st Qtr FY Ztt FY 3rd FY a 4th Qtr FY 1st qtr i Y 2nd Qtr FY
16 s '15 j '16 ` "i7 1 "17 ; '17 "17 IS 18
fAlwGraund Water 195,240,000 217,310,000 1 222,590,000 201,180,000 ' 23,840,000 20,710,000 217,810,000 3 167,410,000' 110,924,000
, J1
'Surface Water 1,211,910,000;1,412,060,000 2 044,500,0=1,379,790,000 ,25S,570,000 1,810,718,000 1,517,199,000 1,410,1$1,000 1,148,171,000
Active Services 32703 32732 32.930 33465 33595 33995 34179 33981 34706
2 5/25/2018
Figure 2 reflects the monthly potable water production over the past
eight years. As can be expected, the average daily demand increases
during the summer months; however, total water production is
dependent on weather conditions, which effects discretionary water
usage.
Figure 2
40 Average Potable Daily Demand Each Month
35
30
25
24 i
x
10
5 p+
r _ k
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
W20-10 62011 U- 201.2 Q 201; kJ2014 .?.015 U201-6W2.017 -J 2018
Figure 3 reflects the monthly potable treated water production and the
Type I Reuse treated water production. The City's reuse water system
began production in October 2012 with three customers: Old Settlers
Park, Dell Diamond, and Forest Creek Golf Course. Since that time, the
City has expanded the system to include Forest Creek HOA, Legends
Village Subdivision, Austin Community College, Texas A&M Health
Science Center, the Forest Grove and Vizcaya Subdivisions. The City
continues to promote the reuse water system in the Northeast part of
Round Rock and as depicted in Figure 3, the demand continues to grow.
Figure 3
Potable vs. Reuse Water
Average Daily Demand Each Month
;z
24
p
1� f
� f
12
7 t (gA
,
,
i
+t �
1
,
p
tfp16
b
f,7a;i�{tw,r Noutrilf-wr ("*,,rnkx`t Irt?Navy FokxrM';mIII AbirllM4.Y )JAW I,:ly Ait..a:i!t `?a>kaS.Lrrt+Cr
4 FY-13 Potable'Nater =,jFY-14 Potable Water m FY-1S Potable 01ater m FY-15 Potable Water FY-17 Potable Water ■FY-1S Potable Water uPeuse VI ater
Figure 4 shows the number of single-family building permits issued
annually. The number of new housing starts per year in the City of
Round Rock has ranged from 222 to 592 over the past ten years. Single-
family permits have remained steady over the past year due to new
subdivisions available within the City. With the release of four new
subdivisions, single-family permitting averaged about 60 permits per
month for the second half of FY-17. Single-family building permits have
continued to increase for the first half of FY-18 as well. Most of the
activity is in the Vizcaya, Warner Ranch, Glen Ellyn, and Madsen Ranch
subdivisions. Several Municipal Utility Districts (MUDs) located in Round
Rock's extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) continue to experience a steady
number of single-family housing starts during this time as well.
Figure 4
Annual Single-Family Building Permits Issued
Residential & MUDs
Soo
780
750 718
700 677
550
600 556 581 591
550 526 _ 535
Soo
.. 464
450 '
400
Yj
350 338 J
300
250
k F ( 3
200
150
4
1.00
50 .` t
a f
Q ..
FY-2009 FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2.01.4 FY-2015 FY-2016 FY-201.7 FY-2018
(tact-Mar)
Round Fuck ■Paloma MUD f#1 a Paloma MUD 42 X Tera Vista 410 X Tera Vista#11 a Walsh Ranch
--------------
5 5/25/2018
Table 1 represents the number of multi-family building permits issued
annually. During FY-07, a large number of new apartment complexes
were constructed within the City. This is reflected in the amount of
impact fees collected during that year. The following years did not see
this amount of multi-family construction; however, the population
continued to grow despite the fewer permits issued. In FY-14, there
was an increase in the number of multi-family projects under
construction; however, these projects were permitted in FY-13, as
shown in the table below. Currently, there are two multi-family
complexes, Ace Apartments and Holly Brook Apartments, under
construction. Several other multi-family projects are in review.
Table 1
Fiscal Yea�r Units Permitted
FY 2005 538
FY 2006 56
FY 2007 2147
FY 2008 224
FY 2009 274
FY 2010 130
FY 2011 0
FY 2012 280
FY 2013 884 (124 LUES)
FY 2014 334 (63.5 LUES)
FY 2015 792 (302 LUES)
FY 2016 608 (157 L UEs)
FY 2017 330 (170 LUES)
FY 2018 (Oct-Mar) 652 (32 7.5 LUES)
Note: The number of LUES that were determined for these developments are
shown in parenthesis.
6 5/25/2018
Table 2 reflects the number of new commercial building permits issued
annually. Over the past several years the number of permits has been
steady, ranging from 20 to 60 permits annually. However, from FY-13
thru FY-16, there was a significant increase in new commercial building
permits, specifically for restaurants, hospitals, medical clinics, banks,
convenient stores, and office buildings.
Table 2
Commercial
Fiscal YearBuilding
FY 2009 30
FY 2010 29
FY 2011 27
FY 2012 20 (100 LUES)
FY 2013 37 (185 L UEs)
FY 2014 33 (165 L UEs)
FY 2015 47 (202 L UEs)
FY 2016 63 (442.5 L UEs)
FY 2017 25 (168 L UEs)
FY 2018 (Oct-Mar) 15 (73.5 LUES)
Note: The number of LUEs for these developments is shown in parenthesis.
In FY-17, commercial growth continued to be strong, even though the
number of permits was down. Many of the permits issued in FY-17 were
larger projects such as UPS. The Building Inspection's Division
anticipates issuing approximately 45 permits in FY-18. Current permits
are mostly hotels, strip centers, and office complexes.
7 5/25/2018
Table 3 and Figure 5 summarize the impact fees collected from FY-14 thru
the first half of FY-18 for residential and commercial building permits.
There has been a significant increase in the amount of impact fees
collected during this time period due to the construction that occurred in
single-family residential, multi-family residential and commercial
developments.
Table 3
Impact
•
Residential Water $ 961,767 $ 11616,580 $ 1,516,823 $ 21812,465 $ 1,687,594
�....................._.... __ �.....W.... ...... ... ._.._................................... ....... . .W.._ ..��__... ...W_..............._..... .. ..,.
Commercial
Water $ 941,463 $ 2,273,857 $ 21342,270 $ 915,617 $ 1,333,372
Wholesale Water $ 1,163,887 $ 1,035,951 $ 1,117,590 $ 818,121 $ 245,293
r._w.., w._.._ . __ _._. _._..._ ...... ....
I
Residential. Sewer $ 322,936 $ 618,240 $ 701,551 $ 1,201,518 $ 78S,6501
_. .... .. __ _ _ . ..._ .N .M. .... ..mmm._. .. .. _ . .__.................. ............. M
Commercial
Sewer $ 398,361 $ 1,084,193 $ 11020,587 $ 935,750 $ 555,250
Wholesale Sewer $ 920,972 $ 1,3041686 $ 11529,096 $ 11532,360 $ 208,482
i
f
Total Collected $ 4,709,386 $ 7,933,507 $ 8,227,917 $ 81215,831 $ 41815,641
8 5/25/2018
Figure 5
Impact Fees Collected FY 2014 - 2018 (Oct-alar)
$9,000,000 'f — $7,933,507 $8,227,917 $8,215,831
$8,000,000 n. .. . w........ .. ..r .u:., r.....,.....
$7,000,000
$6,000,000 ,` ;,._ __ —_$4,815,641 ....
$4..709386
$5,000,000 -..:::a...:.....:..:. ......:. . m:..... aa _:: a....: _.,:.... xw.au::_.: ._
$4,000,000
may.
$3,000,00041/
`
$2,000,001 � ��. .__._._. ..w_:...
$1,000,000 p�
3
$0 3
FY-14 FY-15 FY-16 FY-17 FY-18(Oct-Mar)
■Residential water NCommercial water wholesale Water a Residential Sewer Commercial Sewer wholesale Sewer
In 2015, the latest version of the water model assumed that 1,524 LUES
per year would be added to the water system. For an impact fee of
$4,025 per LUE, this would indicate that the City should have collected
approximately $6.13 million per year in water impact fees if the City
would be growing as projected.
The wastewater model assumed that 1,089 LUEs would be added to the
wastewater system per year. For an impact fee of $2,099 per LUE, this
would indicate that the City should have collected approximately $2.29
million per year in wastewater impact fees if the City would be growing
as projected.
Comparing these assumptions to the actual impact fees collected
indicates that new connections to our water and wastewater systems
are occurring as projected.
9 5/25/2018
Table 4 provides population projections for Round Rock and Round
Rock's ETJ over the coming years. These projections, anticipating a
steady growth rate, indicate that in order to keep up with growth, capital
improvements to the City's water and wastewater utility systems would
be necessary. However, 2012-2018 estimates, shown in parenthesis,
indicate the City's population growth rate is slightly slower than
projected.
Table 4
Inside City City's ETA
Year -Projections Growth Rate Rro"ections Growth Rate
2010 (Census) 99,887 - 1411807 -
2011 100,659 � 0.8% m. 143,960 1.5%
2012 102,349 / (101,702) 1.7% (1.0%) 147,027 2.1%
2013 1041805 / (102,349) 2.4% (0.6%) 151,13311- 2.8%
2014 107,635 / (103,494) 2.7% (1.1%) 155,613 3.0%
2015 1101757 / (105,405) 2.9% (1.9%) 160,385 3.1%
2016 113,968 / (107,117) 2.9% (1.9%) 165,024 2.9%
2017 117,160 / (110,300) 2.8% (3.0%) 169,213 2.5%
2018 120,440 / (112,381) 2.8% (1.9%) 173,490 2.5%
2019 123,812 2.8% 1771859 2.5%
m _
2020 1271279 2.8% 1821323 2.5%
2021 130,461 2.5% 186,062 2.1%
2022 133,723 2.5% 189,881 2.1%
2023 137,066 2.5% 193508 1.9%
2024 1401492 2.5% 197,218 1.9%
mm. 2025 143,302 mm 2.0% 200,312 1.6%
2026 146,168 2.0% 203,462 1.6%
2027 149,092 2.0% 206,670 1.6%
2028152,073 2.0% 209,651 1.4%
2029 155,115 2.0% 212,693 1.5%
2030immm 158 217 mT �P 2.0% 215 795 1.5%
Notes: 2010 is the base year for these projections
( ) Annual Estimates by Planning & Development Services Department
10 5/25/2018
Table 5 provides a summary of the Water System Capital Improvement
Projects that have been completed or are in progress since the last
impact fee analysis was completed in November 2015. In addition,
projects that are anticipated over the next 10 years are also shown
below.
Table 5
Impact Fee
Completed Water Projects Completion Report Actual Cost
Estimated Cost
BCRUA Treated Waterline - Ph 1 Seg. 3 2015 $8,400,000 $8,749,000
University Blvd Waterline Ph 1 2015 $3,634,169 $1,877,000
Parcel 150 2015 $2,955,650 $3,144,000
CR 112 Phase 2 - 24" Waterline (890 PP) 2015 $1,188,049 $888,000
Water Dist. Master Plan & Impact Fee 2015 $138,000 $141,000
Creek Bend 12" Waterline 2016 $415,000 $415,000
Forest Creek Golf Course Reuse Rehab 2016 $150,000 $83,890
............................................................_....................-......................................_-........_..........__............................................._..___
__ ..-- ------ ...........................__----- -------...._.................__............_.-- -_........_...._..............__............_................_._..._
Arterial H Waterline 2017 $856,400 $1,503,000
$17,737,268 $16,800,890
Impact Fee Updated
Water Projects In Progress Completion ; Report Actual Cost
Estimated Cost
South 81 Elevated Storage Tank Pump 2018 $157,000 $157,000
BCRUA Water Treatment Plant - Ph 1B 2018 $34,000 $31,000
.................................._............_...._.._......___ _ ..._ _ ......................................_......._..........................................................._........
...............__................................._.........._..-........................ _
...........................................................
BCRUA Water Treatment Plant - Ph 1C 2020 $4,465,000 $4,152,000
Arterial A Waterline - 24" (Kenny Ft. Blvd.) 2022 $5,024,000 $5,024,000
$9,680,000 $9,364,000
11
5/25/2018
Estimated Impact Fee Updated
Upcoming Water Projects Completion Repo Estimated Cost
Estimated Cost
Water Dist. Master Plan & Impact Fee 2019 € $66,000 $150,000
.................................................................................................................................................................................................
........_......»......»_.._.......».......».........»»._...._.........................................»............_.._..»..__.........................................................................
._...._.............................................................................
Meadow Lake Lines 2019 E $2,367,000 $2,367,000
Saddle Brook Waterlines 2019 $629,000 $629,000
Arterial H Phase II 2019 $1,470,500 $2,941,000
South Creek Waterline 2020 $1,604,000 $1,604,000
Palm Valley Waterline 2020 $1,180,000 $1,180,000
...........................................................................................................»_.»............_..............................._...._._......._.............._._...
.._._......___..............................................................».»....�...._..»__.................................................._.............._........_..__.»_.......................
.................................._...............
.
Avery Center East 2020 $41160,000 $4,160,000
Southeast Red Bud Lane Waterlines �mm 2021 $629,000 $629,000
Brenda Lane Waterlines 2021 ( $2,074,000 $2,074,000
_ _......_................................................._.. ___......................................_......__.._..___...»._._...............
Palm Valley Phase II 2021 $1,002,000 $1,002,000
Water Dist. Master Plan & Impact Fee 2022 $148,000 $154,000
___........._.... _ ...».»_...»_».._..._..............................»._»_........_..._._....._.._._...»._......._...__....._...........................
Gattis School Road 2023 ( $1,130,600 $5,653,000
_._.._.......__._....._..._............_....._._...____....__.._ �_ _.._.___._.__ ___..
Round Rock Glen Waterlines 2024 $2,715,000 $2,715,000
East Loop II 2024 $7,795,000 $7,795,000
_.._
_ ._._.......
South Creek Phase II 2024 [ $2,419,000 $2,419,000
Water Dist. Master Plan & Impact Fee 2024 $75,000 $75,000
.................................................................................................................................................................................................
.._.............__............._........»..................._.............»........_.................»...».....».».».».........................................»_...._....._................._.........
................................................_.__.............
Water Dist. Master Plan & Impact Fee 2025 ( $158 000 $158,000
2.0 MGD Elevated Storage Tank (PP 890) 2025 $7,138,000 $7,138,000
BCRUA Water Treatment Plant - Ph 1D 2025
$12,905,000 $12,905,000
BCRUA Intake & RW Line Ph2A, Seg. 2026 $57,895,705 $57,895,705
Sam Bass Phase I 2026 $14,469,000 $141,469,000
.............._......._....................................._..........................................................
East Loop III 2027 $7,171,000 _ $7,171,000
West Loop 2028 $17,818,000 $17,818,000
Sam Bass Phase II 2030 $1,578,000 $1,578,000
$163,300,805 $168,567,705
12 5/25/2018
Table 6 provides a summary of the Wastewater System Capital
Improvement Projects that have been completed or are in progress
since the last impact fee analysis was completed in November 2015. In
addition, projects that are anticipated over the next 10 years are also
shown below.
Table 6
Completed Wastewater Projects Completion Impact Fee Report Actual Cost
Estimated Cost
McNutt Creek C3 2014 $11191,000 $940,000
McNutt Creek C9 2015 $2,046,000 $1,471,000
Chandler Creek 1 (Upper) 2015 $552,000 $573,000
............................._......................................................................................................................_.................__..._........................
...................................................._........_._..........._......_........_......_.............._....._..........................._.........................................._........
._......_...................._............_....................................
Lake Creek 2 2017 $2,652,000 $1,916,000
Lake Creek 3 2017 $591,000 $563,000
McNutt Creek C2 (referred to as C5) 2018 $1,324,000 $1,762,000
Brushy Creek 5 2018 $288,000 $282,618
............................_......................................._.................___________.___.__.________ __ _.__._..---._-.
$8,644,000 $7,507,618
Wastewater Projects in Progress ' Completion ; Impact Fee Report Updated Actual
Estimated Cost Cost
Brushy Creek 2 2019 $685,000 $349,000
Brushy Creek 4 2019 $173,000
_ � $173,.0.00.. ... ._._.... $173,00.0
............_ _. � . . .. . ..... .
WWTP Expansion12022 $41,600,00030053500
...
................_._..._.................___......_...................._......_.._.._..._...._.........__.____..__._._.___.__....._.............
$42,458,000 $30,575,500
Estimated ` Impact Fee Report ' Updated
Upcoming Wastewate, vProjects Completion Estimated Cost Estimated Cost
McNutt Creek C10 2019 $1,014,000 $1,265,887
Lake Creek 1 2019 $1,995,000 $2,400,000
........._.._..____..._.._.__...__..._------_.._._...__._._......._......___...._._.._.
McNutt Creek C4 2020 $734,000 $765,875
Chandler Creek 3 2021 $753,000 $857,680
Lake Creek 4 2021 $2,235,053
2,235,000
.............._............................................................................................................................._.. .........._............_.....___.............
.................I..........__....................._......_._.�.......................................................... ...
Chandler Creek 2 2022 $520,000 $520,222
McNutt Creek 15 (referred to as 12) 2024 i $528,000 $527,897
-_ .................................................................. _ . . .
.. .............................._ ...........__..................................._....................._._
Hilton Head LS 2024 $11,000 $17,000
13 5/25/2018
Upcoming Wastewater Projects Estimated Impact Fee Report Updated
Continued... Completion Estimated Cost Estimated Cost
McNutt Creek C12 2024 $949,000 $1,204,491
............._....................................__._. ...
McNutt Creek D2 2025 $3,678,000 $3,339,000
SE Annex LS 2025 $820,000 $819,036
........_..........._......................................................................................_......___......__...._.._...__......_........_.....__._....... ._....
_.__...._..........._....................................._..............._.._._._...__._............................._.................................................__............................
............................................
...........
McNutt Creek D4 2025 $1,394,000 $1,131,502
Forest Creek LS 2026 $1,211,000 $1,600,000
Forest Creek 2 2026 $2,148,000 $2,148,396
............
Onion Creek 1 2026 i $359,000 $1,500,000
McNutt Creek C6 2027
$207,000 $790,782
......................................................................_..............................._.........._...___._...._......_.._...._...._._._.__.
Onion Creek 2 2027 $214,000 $1,348,025
._.._.................._......___.._.....__...____..____ __-_._ . _._
__..............._._.. ( _____..__._._._.........._........................................__.._._..__._._..............._..................................._..........
.
Spanish Oak 1 2027 $1,492,000 $1,491,858
McNutt Creek D5 2028 1 $691,000 $748,000
__._.........._..................._............................___.........____..........................................................
Mayfield Park 2 2028 $1,960,000 $1,960,456
McNutt Creek C8b 2028
F $823,000 $706,355
................_...__.............................................__..................__.................................._..............
Mayfield Park 1 2028 $393,000 $393,290
.
............................................................._......__......_.___.._._...___.._._.._...._ ___._.
Stone Oak LS 2028
$295,000 $295,000
i $24,424,000 j $28,065,805
Report Completed Reuse Projects Completion Impact Fee RepActual Cost
Estimated Cost
Reuse Phase II 2015 $2,108,500 $2,108,500
Reuse Phase VI 2016 $900,000 $900,000
Reuse Phase IV-B 2016 $3,719,000 $3,013,152
$6,727,573 $6,021,652
Upcoming Reuse Projects Estimated Impact Fee Report Updated
Completion Estimated Cost Estimated Cost
Reuse Phase V - Stony Point High
School 2022 F $558,376 ' $600,000
$558,376 $600,000
14 5/25/2018
Figure 6 provides a comparison of the Single-Family Residential Utility
Rates for Round Rock customers versus surrounding Central Texas City
and Municipal Utility Districts. As depicted, Round Rock utility rates
remain some of the lowest in the region.
Figure 6
Single-Family Residential
Water and Wastewater Rates Comparison
(monthly cost)*
$lso . ... ... ..... ...... .
tic>7.8�.
$160 $159.35
$140 S139.34
$124.00 $123.75 $122.40
$120
5106.30
$:100 S99.6U $96.69
59Z.�f5 590.7`()
$86.70
$80 $$1.33
570.60
$61.80 $53.65
$60
$40
$20
$0
nil Y. l
-q- i�C� 4��tifl
a(Nater a Wastewater
* assumes 10,000 gallons water & 8,000 gallons wastewater used
15 5/25/2018
Table 7 compares Round Rock's Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to
other Central Texas cities. Historically, Round Rock had one of the
highest total impact fees charged for new connections to the water and
wastewater systems. However, several of the surrounding cities have
increased their fees over the past few years and have surpassed Round
Rock. Round Rock's philosophy is for new customers and developments
to pay for the capital improvements that are required due to the growth.
Table 7
WastewaterArea Impact Fee Comparison
ast
C-ty/utility Water
dated
Manville WSC 2008
__.___.. .....w...�.w _._..�...�.�..�._.. �.�_____ .�..w,... $2,800_. n/a._ ..m....... $2,800._....
i
Brushy Creek MUD 2012 $2,095 ]--$i 804 $3,899
Cedar Park 2013 $2f250 $2fOOO $4,250 ;
P
Hutto 2013 $3,625 i 2 128
$5f753
k
San Marcos
2014 $2,285 __.�........$3,506 $5,791
Jonah Water SUD7? 2013 r $5 000 $1f068
$6,068
._ _ �_. __
3
r `
Round Rock 2016 $4,025 $2,099 $6f124
i
Pflugerville 2014 $4,241 _$2f725 $
725 s 6 966
8 I
s
Leander
2017 $4309 $2,820 $7,129 M _
Austin
...a., 2014 ..... $5,400
.. $2,200 . .:.....,... ,.m..__ $7,600 _....n...b
:Georgetown 1 2017 1 $7,039 $2,997 $10,036
16 5/25/2018
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The CIAC and City Council approved the new Impact Fees which went
into effect March 1, 2016. Although the projected population growth in
Round Rock is proceeding at a slightly slower rate than what was
anticipated in the impact fee report, this has not caused a significant
concern since the number of connections to the water and wastewater
systems are occurring at the projected rate anticipated by the City.
As a result of the potential volatility in growth rates and infrastructure
requirements, the City recommends the impact fees be reviewed every
three to four years so that the fees are set according to the growth
patterns and needs of the water and wastewater utility system
improvements. It is anticipated that we will update our Water and
Wastewater Master Plans in 2018 or 2019. Following the Master Plan
update, we will review our adopted impact fees. The next Capital
Improvements Plan Progress Report will be presented to the CIAC and
to the City Council in approximately six months.
17 5/25/2018