CM-2018-1810 - 8/10/2018U.S. Department of dousing and Urban
Development
451 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20410
www.bud.gov
espanol hud,gov
Environmental Review for Activity/Project that is Categorically
Excluded Subject to Section 58.5
Pursuant to 24 CFR 58.35(a)
Proiect Information
Project Name: Habitat for Humanity Home Repair Project CDBG
Responsible Entity: City of Round Rock
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): NIA
State/Local Identifier: NIA
Preparer: Elizabeth Alvarado
Certifying Officer Name and Title: Laurie Hadley, City Manager
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): NIA
Consultant (if applicable): NIA
Direct Comments to: N/A
Project Location: 202 Barrhall Drive Round Rock TX
Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]:
Scope of work: ADA improvements in bathroom (wheelchair access), Replace bathroom sinks, flooring,
window repair and garage door repair.
Level of Environmental Review Determination:
§ 58.35 Categorical exclusions.
Categorical exclusion refers to a category of activities for which no environmental
impact statement or environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact
under NEPA is required, except in extraordina!y circumstances (see § 58.2(a)(3)) in
which a normally excluded activity may have a significant impact. Compliance with the
other applicable Federal environmental laws and authorities listed in 4 58.5 is required
for any categorical exclusion listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
(a)Categorical exclusions subject to 58.5. The following activities are categorically
excluded under NEPA, but may be subject to review under authorities listed in 58.5:
(3) Rehabilitation of buildings and improvements when the following conditions are
met:
(i) In the case of a building for residential use (with one to four units), the density is
not increased beyond four units, and the land use is not changed;
Funding Information
Grant Number
HUD Program Funding Amount
B 17MC480514
CDBG $50,000 (not to exceed
$10,000 per home
Estimated Total HUD Funded Amount: $50,000
Estimated Total Project Cost (HUD and non -HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32(d)]: 550,000
Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities
Record below the compliance or conformance determinations for each statute, executive order, or
regulation. Provide credible, traceable, and supportive source documentation for each authority. Where
applicable, complete the necessary reviews or consultations and obtain or note applicable permits of
approvals. Clearly note citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references. Attach additional
documentation as appropriate.
Compliance Factors:
Are formal
Compliance determinations
Statutes, Executive Orders,
compliance
and Regulations listed at 24
steps or
CFR §58.5 and §58.6
mitigation
required?
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4
& 58.6
Airport Hazards
Yes No
Project does not include sale or acquisition
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D
❑ ®
of land NOR is project site within 15,000 ft
of a military airport or within 2,500 ft of a
civilian airport. Attached is documentation
showing project site's proximity to nearest
airports.
Coastal Barrier Resources
Yes No
Project site is not in or near the Texas
Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as
❑ ®
Coastal Barriers. Attached is a map showing
amended by the Coastal Barrier
the proximity of Round Rock to the Texas
Improvement Act of 1990 [16
Coastal Barrier.
USC 3501
Flood Insurance
Yes No
Project site is not located in a floodplain.
Flood Disaster Protection Act of
❑ ®
FEMA flood map is attached. Flood
1973 and National Flood
insurance is not required.
Insurance Reform Act of 1994
142 USC 40014128 and 42 USC
11 5154a
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4
& 58.5
Clean Air
Yes No
Round Rock is in Williamson County which
Clean Air Act as amended
❑ ®
is NOT a non -attainment county according
particularly section 176(c) & (d);
to the EPA's most recent data report dated
40 CFR Parts 6 51, 93
June 30, 2018. Report attached.
Coastal Zone Management
Yes No
Coastal Zone Management does not pertain
Coastal Zone Management Act,
❑ ®
to this project because project site is not near
sections 307(c) & (d)
the Texas Coastal Zone. Map of Texas
Coastal Zone attached.
Contamination and Toxic
Substances
Yes No
On site visits and observations to the project
❑ ®
site and nearby vicinity as well as online
24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.5(i)(2)
reports from the EPA and NetrOnline did not
reveal any on-site or nearby toxic,
hazardous, or radioactive substances that
could affect the health and safety of project
occupants or conflict with the intended use
of the property. Project site is in a
developed subdivision that historically has
been used for residential use. See attached
maps, historic aerial view maps and reports.
Endangered Species
Yes No
After careful review of the project location,
Endangered Species Act of 1973,
E] ®
project description, and review of the plants
particularly section 7; 50 CFR
and species on the threatened and
Part 402
endangered list, it is my determination that
the nature and location of the project shall
not jeopardize the continued existence of
federally listed plants and animals or result
in the adverse modification or destruction of
designated critical habitat therefore further
review or consultation from the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service is not required. This is
minor home repair and will not disturb the
ground.
Explosive and Flammable
Yes No
Project does not include a hazardous facility
Hazards
❑ ®
nor does project include development or
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C
construction that will increase residential
densities. Site visit and research revealed
that here are no current or planned stationary
aboveground storage containers.
Farmlands Protection
Yes No
This category does not pertain to project due
❑ ®
to nature and location. Project site is in an
Farmland Protection Policy Act
established neighborhood. Project site map
of 1981, particularly sections
is attached.
1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFA Part
658
Floodplain Management
Yes No
The project is Not located in a Special Flood
Executive Order 11988,
❑ ®
Hazard Are. FEMA map attached. An 8
particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR
step process is not required.
Part 55
Historic Preservation
Yes No
See approval for project to proceed from
National Historic Preservation
❑ ®
Texas Historical Commission attached.
Act of 1966, particularly sections
106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800
Noise Abatement and Control
Yes No
Property is not within 2000 feet of a major
Noise Control Act of 1972, as
❑ ®
roadway and is not within 3000 feet of a
amended by the Quiet
railroad. Noise calculation is not required.
Communities Act of 1978; 24
Mitigation is not required for minor home
CFR Part 51 Subpart B
repair but encouraged if noise exceeds 65
decibels.
Sole Source Aquifers
Yes No
Property is located in the Edwards Aquifer
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974,
❑ ®
Re -charge Zone but nature of project will
as amended, particularly section
not impact the aquifer. There is not ground
1424(e); 40 CFR Part 149
disturbance or significant rehab in the scope
of work. See documentation showing
project on the Edwards Aquifer Mapper.
Wetlands Protection
Yes No
Project sites is not located in or near
Executive Order 119
❑ ®
Wetlands nor will it impact wetlands.
2 and 5
particularly sections 2 a
Wetlands maps are attached showing project
site.
Wild and Scenic Rivers
Wild and Scenic rivers does not apply to this project.
Yes No
Nature and location of project is not near nor will it
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of
®
impact any wild and scenic rivers or any river
1968, particularly section 7(b)
segments that potentially qualify as national wild,
and (c)
scenic, or recreational river areas. See map of nearest
wild and scenic river to project site.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Environmental Justice
Yes No
Minor home repair of a single- family home in an
❑ ®
existing subdivision is unlikely to adversely affect
Executive Order 12898
social resources. Research determined that there are
no disproportionately high and adverse effect to
minority or low-income populations in the project
site/area. See documentation from GoodGuide
Scorecard.
Field Inspection (Date and completed by): Field inspection done on May Z5, 2018 by CDBG Coordinator Liz
Alvarado. Pictures taken on these dates as well.
Summary of Findings and Conclusions: NIA
Mitigation Measures and, Conditions 140 CFR 1505.2(c)1
Summarize below all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid, or
eliminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non-compliance or non-conformance with
the above -listed authorities and factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into
project contracts, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The staff responsible
for implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation
plan.
Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure
N/A NIA
Determination:
® This categorically excluded activity/project converts to Exempt, per 5834(a)(12) because there are
no circumstances which require compliance with any of the federal laws and authorities cited at
§58.5. Funds may be committed and drawn down after certification of this part for this (now)
EXEMPT project; OR
❑ This categorically excluded activity/project cannot convert to Exempt because there are
circumstances which require compliance with one or more federal laws and authorities cited at
§58.5. Complete consultation/mitigation protocol requirements, publish NOURROF and obtain
"Authority to Use Grant Funds" (HUD 7015.16) per Section 58.70 and 58.71 before committing
or drawing down any funds; OR
❑ This project is now subject to a full Environmental Assessment according to Part 58 Subpart E due
to extraordinary gircumstances (Section 58.35(c)).
Preparer Signature: LGiI �L,�7r�'L Date:�,�
Name/Title/Organization: Elizabeth Alvarado CDBG Coordinator
City of Round Rock
Responsible tity Agency ficial Signature:
Date: '/ 6—/
Name/Title: Laurie Hadley, City Manager
This original, signed document and related supporting material must be retained on file by the
Responsible Entity in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24
CFR Part 58.38) and in accordance with recordkeeping requirements for the HUD program(s).
City of Round Rock
ROUND ROCK
xA: Agenda Item Summary
Agenda Number:
Title: Consider executing the Categorical Exclusion Subject to 58.5 Determination
24 CFR 58.35 (a) (3) (i) for the CDBG Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home
Repair at 202 Barrhall Drive.
Type: City Manager Item
Governing Body: City Manager Approval
Agenda Date: 8/10/2018
Dept Director: Brad Wiseman
Cost:
Indexes:
Attachments: LAF CDBG Environmental Review 202 Barrhall (08.03.2018)
(00406827xA08F8), ERR Barrhall Drive
Department: Planning and Development Services Department
Text of Legislative File CM -2018-1810
Consider executing the Categorical Exclusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a) (3) (i) for the
CDBG Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair at 202 Barrhall Drive.
HUD requires that every CDBG project file contain a written record of the environmental review
undertaken for each project which is termed the Environmental Review Record (ERR). The ERR shall
be available for public review and must contain all of the recommended formats. The ERR must
contain all of the environmental review documents, public notices, written determination and any
environmental review findings pertaining to the decision making and actions related to the
individual project. The CDBG 2017 Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair project at 202
Barrhall Drive required that a Categorical Exclusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a)(3)
(i) be conducted and executed by the Certifying Officer. Scope of work inlcudes ADA improvements
in bathroom to allow wheelchair access, replace bathroom sinks, flooring and window repair and
garage door repair.
City of Round Rock Page 1 Printed on 8/9/2018