R-2019-0349 - 8/22/2019 RESOLUTION NO. R-2019-0349
WHEREAS, the City of Round Rock has previously entered into a Contract for Engineering
Services ("Contract") with K. Friese & Associates, Inc. for the Kenney Fort Boulevard Extension
Project, and
WHEREAS, K. Friese & Associates, Inc. has submitted Supplemental Contract No. 2 to the
Contract to modify the provisions for the scope of services and to increase the compensation, and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to enter into said Supplemental Contract No. 2 with
K. Friese & Associates, Inc.,Now Therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS,
That the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City Supplemental
Contract No. 2 to the Contract with K. Friese & Associates, Inc., a copy of same being attached hereto
as Exhibit"A"and incorporated herein for all purposes.
The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and
subject of the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted was posted and that such meeting was
open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Resolution and the subject matter
hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act,
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended.
RESOLVED this 22nd day of August, 2019.
CRAIG ORG , Mayor
City of Round llck, Texas
ATTEST:
swva.
SARA L. WHITE, City Clerk
0112.1902;00429627
EXHIBIT
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON §
SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT NO.2
TO CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
FIRM: K FRIESE & ASSOCIATES,INC. ("Engineer")
I �
ADDRESS: 1120 S. Capital of Texas Hh!hway,Building 2,Suite 100,Austin,TX 78746
PROJECT: Kenney Fort Boulevard Extension
This Supplemental Contract No. 2 to Contract for Engineering Services is made by and between
the City of Round Rock, Texas, hereinafter called the "City"' and K Friese & Associates, Inc.,
hereinafter called the"Engineer"'.
WHEREAS, the City and Engineer executed a Contract for Engineering Services, hereinafter
called the "Contract", on the 9th day of April, 2015 for the Kenney Fort Boulevard Extension
Project in the amount of$450,961.00; and
WHEREAS,the City and Engineer executed Supplemental Contract No. I on February If,2016
to amend the scope of services and to increase the compensation by $79,745.00 to a total of
$530,706.00;and
WHEREAS, it has become necessary to amend the Contract to modify the provisions for the
scope of services and to increase the compensation by$505,778.00 to a total of$1,036,484.00;
NOW THEREFORE, premises considered, the City and the Engineer agree that said Contract
is amended as follows:
Article 1. City Services and Exhibit A. City Services, shall be amended as set forth in the
attached Addendum To Exhibit A.
if.
Article 2. Engineering Services and Exhibit B. En, L*neering Services shall be amended as set
forth in the attached Addendum to Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Work Schedule shall be amended as set
forth in the attached Addendum to Exhibit C
Supplemental Contract Rev.06,16
0199 1511,00428882 84275
Ill.
Article 4, Compensation, and Exhibit D. Fee Schedule shall be amended by increasing by
$505,778.00 the lump sum amount payable under the Contract for a total of$1,036,484.00, as
shown by the attached Addendum,to Exhibit D.
IN WITNESS WHERFOF, the City and the Engineer have executed this Supplemental
Contract in duplicate.
[signature pages follow]
Supplemental Contract Rev.06,1 6
0199 1511,00428892 84275
2
K FRIESE &ASSOCIA'T'ES, INC.
:
BY
Thomas M.Owens, P.E., Executive Vice President
. ................. .............
Date
Supplemental Contract Rev.06,1 i
1 199 1511.€0428882 84275
CITY OF ROUND ROCK APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY*0 -
Craig Morgan,Mayor Stephan L. Sheets,City Attorney
Date
Supplemental Contract Rev.O&A6
0199 1511,00428882 84275
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT A
City Services
The City of Round Rock (City) will provide the following information and other
assistance to K Friese & Associates, (Engineer) that the City deems appropriate
and necessary.
1. Any readily available pertinent existing information relating to the services
to be performed by the Engineer; the City will provide one copy of such
information in a format chosen by the City.
2. Clear direction and/or response to questions or requests made by the
Engineer in the course of the Engineer's performance of services.
3. Timely review of deliverable that have been properly completed and
submitted by the Engineer, and timely provision of comments, if any, to
the Engineer resulting from said reviews.
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT B
Engineering Services
UNDERSTANDING
The original contract for this project was for preparation of a single set of PS&E for
Kenney Fort Boulevard from Chandler Creek Boulevard to Old Settlers Boulevard.
The project alignment was based on a schematic study previously completed by
KFA. The plans were to design a four lane divided roadway that would be
expandable to six lanes in the future.
alEgIVIENI 4A
After the start of design, KFA was notified that the adjacent Old Settlers Park was
about to undergo an expansion adjacent to the roadway. As result, the alignment of
Kenney Fort Boulevard needed to be adjusted to accommodate the planned park
expansion. During review of the park design, KFA identified a major drainage
conflict with the park design and future roadway cross-drainage. KFA met several
times with City staff and the park engineer to develop solutions, including diverting
roadway cross-drainage to another location and design of a new downstream
drainage channel to accommodate the roadway drainage. In order to provide
vehicular access to the park, KFA was asked to separate out the portion of the
roadway into a separate construction set (called Kenney Fort Boulevard Segment
4A) and provide construction phase services for that separate phase. All tasks
described herein with "Segment 4A" are associated with this separate construction
set.
SEGMENT 4B
After completion of the 60% submittal, KFA was notified by the City that the adjacent
Cressman property had recently been acquired by a developer and desired to
realign the road through the Cressman property to accommodate their development
plans. Furthermore, the developer and the City agreed to design and construct a
segment of Kenney Fort Segment 4 from the proposed subdivision driveway and Old
Settlers Boulevard. This segment consists of about 7,000 linear feet of alignment
and would construct the western three lanes of the future six lane roadway. Items
under this heading will be effort to revise the design to a new alignment and produce
an additional set of plans, bid phase, and construction phase services.
2E!QMgHJ Ig
KFA was also notified that the City would like to revise the design of Kenney Fort
Boulevard from a 4-lane divided arterial to a 6-lane divided arterial and extend the
limits south to approximately 250-feet south of Joe DiMaggio Boulevard. The project
limits will be extended by approximately 800-feet south of the current terminus. The
extension of the project will include widening the existing bridge over Chandler
Creek, adding a right turn lane from northbound Kenney Fort Boulevard to
eastbound Joe DiMaggio Boulevard, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of
Kenney Fort Boulevard and Joe DiMaggio Boulevard, and design of the full 6-lane
divided arterial throughout. Additional storm drain design will be required to
accommodate the 6-lane divided arterial as the 4-lane section utilized center ditches
to convey storm water. This supplemental will include PS&E for the 6-lane divided
arterial including illumination, sidewalk, shared use path, storm drain, traffic signal,
B-1 of 9
bridge and retaining wall design as it applies to the additional services. The PS&E
will include re-submittal of the 60% submittal with the described design revisions.
ANTICIPATED MILESTONE UUMETALS
Segment 4A—Complete, no further submittals
Segment 413--90%, 100%
Segment 4C—60%, 90%, 100%
SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASK 1 —PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1. Project Meetings and Park Coordination (Segment 4A) — KFA attended extra
meetings with City staff and conducted ongoing coordination with the park
expansion engineer to specifically discuss coordination between the two projects.
2. Project Management/Administration (Segment 4C Extend Limits) — This task
includes routine communication with the City; managing sub-consultants,
manpower, budgets and schedules; invoicing; implementing and monitoring of
QA/QC efforts; and other activities associated with managing the project. A
design phase extension of 12 months is assumed for this proposal.
3. Project Meetings and Status Reports - KFA attended a supplemental scoping
meeting with City staff. KFA will provide status reports to the City with invoices
documenting progress, budget and schedule for the additional 60%submittal.
TASK 2—FINAL,DESIGN
1. Construction Plans (Segment 4A) — KFA produced an additional plan set and
cost estimates for the Kenney Fort Boulevard Segment 4A project. The sheets in
this plan set included:
a. COVER SHEET(1 Sheet)
b. INDEX OF SHEETS (1 Sheet)
c. GENERAL NOTES (1 Sheet)
d. QUANTITY SUMMARY SHEETS (5 Sheets)
e. PROJECT LAYOUT(I Sheet)
f. TYPICAL SECTIONS (11 Sheet)
g. ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE (2 Sheets)
h. INTERSECTION DETAIL (11 Sheet)
i. DRIVEWAY PLAN AND PROFILES (11 Sheet)
j. ROADWAY DETAILS (3 Sheets)
k. OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAPS (2 Sheets)
1. ONSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAPS (1 Sheet)
B-2 of 9
m. DRAINAGE PLAN (11 Sheet)
n. DRAINAGE PROFILES (I Sheet)
o. CULVERT LAYOUT(1 Sheet)
p. CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA (11 Sheet)
q. CHANNEL GRADING PLAN (11 Sheet)
r. DRAINAGE DETAILS (16 Sheets)
s. SWPPP (1 Sheet)
t. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN (1 Sheet)
u. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS (3 Sheets)
v. SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN (11 Sheet)
w. SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS (5 Sheets)
x. ILLUMINATION LAYOUT(11 Sheet)
y. ILLUMINATION DETAILS (3 Sheets)
z. CROSS SECTIONS (5 Sheets)
2. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (Segment 4A) — KFA prepared and
submitted an engineer's opinion of probable construction cost in Microsoft Excel
format at each submittal to the City.
3. Revise Alignment(Segment 413)—KFA will:
a. Revise roadway alignment and update 3D models to accommodate new
alignment
b. Revise drainage analysis and 3D models to accommodate new alignment
4. Construction Plans (Segment 4B) — KFA will revise the roadway alignment and
an additional plan set and cost estimates for the Kenney Fort Boulevard Segment
413 project. As this segment was previously designed to 60%, the submittal
schedule for this segment will include 90% and 100% plans. The sheets in this
plan set include:
a. COVER SHEET(I Sheet)
b, INDEX OF SHEETS (11 Sheet)
c. GENERAL NOTES (11 Sheet)
d. QUANTITY SUMMARY SHEETS (5 Sheets)
e, PROJECT LAYOUT(I Sheet)
f. TYPICAL SECTIONS (1 Sheet)
g. ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE (7 Sheets)
h. INTERSECTION DETAIL (2 Sheets)
i. DRIVEWAY PLAN AND PROFILES (1 Sheet)
j. ROADWAY DETAILS (3 Sheets)
k. OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAPS (2 Sheets)
1. ONSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAPS (11 Sheet)
m. DRAINAGE PLAN (4 Sheets)
n, DRAINAGE PROFILES (4 Sheets)
o. CULVERT LAYOUT (1 Sheet)
p. CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA (11 Sheet)
q. DRAINAGE DETAILS (20 Sheets)
B-3 of 9
r. SWPPP (1 Sheet)
s. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN (4 Sheets)
t. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS (3Sheets)
u. SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN (4 Sheets)
v. SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS (5 Sheets)
w. ILLUMINATION LAYOUT(4 Sheets)
x. ILLUMINATION DETAILS (3 Sheets)
y, CROSS SECTIONS (23 Sheets)
5. Environmental Documentation — Cox/McLain Environmental Consulting, Inc.
(CMEC) will provide environmental consulting services for the additional
improvements of Kenney Fort Boulevard. The following assessments conducted
under this agreement will be reported and submitted in an Environmental
Technical Memorandum:
a. Archeological Resources — CMEC cultural resources personnel will
conduct searches of the THC's Sites Atlas and other data sources to
identify previously documented archeological sites, cemeteries, historical
markers, properties and districts listed on the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP), and State Antiquities Landmarks (SALs) for the newly
added southern extension, which falls outside the previous survey area of
potential effects (APE). Results of the search will be integrated with soil
information, topographic maps, aerial photographs, and other pertinent
data in a coordination letter to the THC in compliance with the Antiquities
Code of Texas. Additionally, a copy of the coordination letter and maps
will be provided to USACE Cultural Resource Specialists. Any additional
investigations required by either agency (e.g., a field survey under Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act) could be provided under a
separate scope of work.
b. Water Resources —CMEC will collect data on surface water streams and
other existing water resources and the potential for pollution during
construction and from the completed facility. The I 00-year flood plain, as
delineated by FEMA, will be identified and the impacts of the proposed
project will be assessed. Potential for impacts to groundwater will be
discussed; no Geologic Assessment is required (the project is outside the
Edwards Aquifer Recharge, Contributing, or Transition Zones). CMEC
wetlands specialists will perform evaluations of wetlands and waters of the
U.S. in all areas potentially affected by the proposed project. Ordinary
High Water Marks within the proposed right-of-way will be mapped using
GPS and GIS techniques, and potential impacts to any features will be
evaluated. Wetland field delineations will be conducted, and wetland data
sheets will be prepared and included in the report appendix. This task will
include a determination of the type of permit (if any) that will be needed
from the USAGE. The permit determination will be summarized in the
B-4 of 9
report. Any 404 permit preparation would be carried out under an
additional scope and budget.
c. Biological Resources — CIVIEC biologists will describe project area
biological resources including vegetation communities and wildlife habitat.
Ecologically sensitive resources, including potential threatened or
endangered species habitat, will be identified and their potential to be
affected by project construction and operation will be assessed and
described in the environmental report. A wildlife habitat assessment for
suitability for endangered species will be conducted by CIVIEC. Additional
habitat assessment services will be provided by a registered geologist
with a specialization in hydrogeology and karst species habitat
requirements. This assessment will focus on the unnamed tributary to
Chandler Branch and a potential spring and spring run that have been
observed there. The assessment will focus on the likelihood that the
spring may provide habitat for federally protected, aquifer-dependent
species including the Jollyville Plateau salamander. Should the
assessment deten-nine that the spring and spring run are potential habitat
for protected species, coordination with the USAGE and/or USFWS may
be required.
d. Hazardous Materials — CMEC will perform an ASTM E1527-compliant
database search for potential hazardous materials sites within the
expanded project footprint and regulatory radii.
e. Environmental Tech Memo Preparation/Comment Response — This task
includes the writing and production of a complete environmental technical
memorandum, as well as revisions in response to comments from the
Engineer and the City of Round Rock. Only generalized, preliminary
mitigation measures will be presented where adverse impacts may
potentially occur; detailed mitigation plans are not part of this Scope of
Services. This task includes the submittal of electronic copies of the draft
and final environmental tech memo (the Engineer/City of Round Rock
review).
6. Design Survey — Inland Geodetics, LP (Inland) will perform additional design
survey consisting of design topographic data of the existing Kenney Fort
Boulevard roadway and bridge, including the intersection of Joe DiMaggio
Boulevard, The survey will include improvements, drainage features, trees 8" and
up, visible utilities, "one call" markings, rock outcroppings, driveways, and other
entities as directed by the project engineer. Back of curbs, striping, centerline
spot elevations and sign inventory will be collected for approximately 1000 feet
south of the southern limits for traffic control planning. Two creek cross sections
up and downstream from the face of bridge will also be obtained, The design
survey will depict the approximate limits of existing right of way.
7. Geotechnical Investigation — Arias Geoprofessionals, Inc. (Arias) will perform a
Global Stability Analysis to support the retaining wall design at the north and
B-5 of 9
south abutments of the bridge over Chandler Creek as well as provide a D50
grain size test for use in Scour Analysis. Two borings are proposed to a depth of
50-feet. Due to site conditions, it is anticipated that at least one boring will require
traffic control coordinated with the City of Round Rock Transportation
Department. This scope does not include recommendations for bridge
foundations or pavement structure, A report will be generated summarizing the
following:
• Description of the field exploration program;
• Description of the laboratory testing program and results;
• Soil boring plan that depicts boring locations on a base map provided by
Client. Borings will be located using a hand-held GPS device accurate
to about 10 horizontal meters;
• Soil boring logs with detailed descriptions and soil classifications based on
the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2487);
• Results of grain size and hydrometer tests for use in scour analysis;
• Discussion of area geology, and subsurface information including stratigraphy
and generalized subsurface conditions;
• Depth of groundwater, if encountered;
• Results of global stability analyses of the proposed embankments
on configurations determined to be critical or representative
sections;
• Recommendations for embankment construction and slopes; and
• Comments regarding excavation potential and groundwater.
8. Chandler Creek Impact Analysis — KFA will provide additional drainage analysis
including:
a. Hydrologic impact analysis of additional impervious cover from Kenney
Fort Boulevard at Chandler Creek utilizing the 2016 Upper Brushy Creek
Water Control and Improvement District(UBCWCID) HEC-HMS model.
b. Hydraulic impact analysis at Chandler creek utilizing the 2016 UBCWCID
HEC-RAS model. The hydraulic impact analysis will include evaluation of
the impact of fill in the floodplain and bridge widening as defined by the
2016 UBCWCID models. It is not anticipated that the hydrologic impact
will need to be integrated into the hydraulic impact analysis.
9. Construction Plans (SEGMENT 4C) —KFA will produce the following sheets (11"
x 17" Full Size) as appropriate for the revised roadway design. QA/QC is
included in each sheet task.
a. MISCELLANEOUS PLANS
1. QUANTITY/SUMMIARY SHEETS (5 Sheets)—
1.
1. Roadway Quantities
2. Summary of Drainage Structures and Erosion Control
3. Summary of Pavement Markings and Traffic Controls
4. Summary of Small Signs
B-6 of 9
5. Summary of Bridge and Retaining Wall Quantities
b. ROADWAY PLANS &GEOMETRY
1. TYPICAL SECTIONS (1 Sheet)—Proposed typical sections
2. ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS (2 sheets)
c. GRADING AND DETAILS
1. CROSS-SECTIONS — (3 Sheets) KFA will complete design
cross-sections at 100-foot stations and other locations as
necessary for the determination of cut and fill quantities and to
further refine the design vertical geometry.
2. INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS (1 Sheet) — KFA will provide
intersection details for the Kenney Fort at Joe DiMaggio
intersection including a 113=40' scale plan view and spot grading
at all PC, PT, edge of pavement and street tie-ins.
3. ROADWAY DETAILS (1 Sheets) — KFA will include
miscellaneous detail sheets for the project.
d. DRAINAGE PLANS
1. OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAP (2 Sheet)
2. ONSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAP (1 Sheet)
3. BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA SHEET(11 Sheet)
4. BRIDGE SCOUR SHEET (1 Sheet)
5. STORM SEWER PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS (2 Sheets)
6. STORM SEWER HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS (1 Sheet)
7. DRAINAGE DETAIL SHEETS (1 Sheets)
e. RETAINING WALL PLANS
1. RETAINING WALL LAYOUTS (4 Sheets)
2. RETAINING WALL DETAILS (4 Sheets)
f. BRIDGE PLANS
1. BRIDGE LAYOUT—NB WIDENING (2 Sheets)
2. NB TEST HOLE DATA(1 Sheet)
3. NB WIDENING EST. QUANTITIES AND BRG SEAT ELEV(1
Sheet)
4. NB WIDENING REMOVAL PLAN (1 Sheet)
5. NB WIDENING ABUTMENT DETAILS (2 Sheets)
6, NB WIDENING BENT DETAILS (1 Sheet)
7. NB WIDENING SPAN DETAILS (1 Sheet)
8. NB WIDENING GIRDER LAYOUT(1 Sheet)
9, BRIDGE LAYOUT—SB WIDENING (2 Sheets)
10.SB TEST HOLE DATA (1 Sheet)
11.SB WIDENING EST. QUANTITIES AND BRG SEAT ELEV. (1
Sheet)
B-7 of 9
12. SB WIDENING REMOVAL PLAN (1 Sheet)
13, SB WIDENING ABUTMENT DETAILS (2 Sheets)
14. SB WIDENING BENT DETAILS(1 Sheet)
15. SB WIDENING SPAN DETAILS (1 Sheet)
Ira. SB WIDENING GIRDER LAYOUT (1 Sheet)
17. SB WIDENING MEDIAN DETAILS (1 Sheet)
18. BRIDGE STANDARDS, 0411 (3 Sheets)
19. MODIFIED BRIDGE STANDARD, BAS-A (MOD) (1 Sheet)
g. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS
1. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHEETS (3 Sheets)
h. SIGNING, MARKING AND SIGNALIZATION
1. SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING LAYOUTS (1 Sheet)
2. TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONDITION DIAGRAM (1 Sheet)
3. TRAFFIC SIGNAL LAYOUT (1 Sheet)
4. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WIRING AND SIGN DETAILS (1 Sheet)
i. ILLUMINATION
1. ILLUMINATION PLANS (1 Sheet)
j. EROSION CONTROL SHEETS
1. EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS (1 Sheet)
10.Opinion of Probable Construction Cost — KFA will prepare and submit an
engineer's opinion of probable construction cost for the 60% resubmittal.
11, Utility Coordination — KFA will amend the utility conflict matrix and coordinate
with utility owners to relocate facilities which cannot be avoided by reasonable
roadway design revisions.
TASK 3--CONSTRUCTION PHASE
1. Construction Phase Services (Segment 4C) — KFA will assist the City of Round
Rock with contract administration during the construction phase of the project.
KFA`s services include:
a. Submittal Review — KFA maintained a log of all Contractor submittals,
tracked review progress, reviewed and approved submittals, and
distributed submittals to the appropriate parties.
B-8 of 9
b. Requests for Information (RF[s) — KFA will provided answers to requests
for information (RFI's) from Contractor as related to possible conflicts and
clarifications needed between plans and specifications.
c, Record Drawings. KFA used the Contractor's redline as-built drawings to
document as-built conditions in the final record drawings,
ASSUMPTIONS
1. Preparation of a FEMA permit including a Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) or a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) is not anticipated to be necessary
and is not included in this proposal.
2. Water quality and storm water detention design is not included in this proposal.
3. Waterline design is not included in this scope.
4. Revision of Chandler Creek Bridge to accommodate water line is not included
with this scope.
5. Relocation of reuse water lines is not anticipated at this time. If it becomes
necessary to include, a separate scope and fee will be prepared.
6. Temporary signals for traffic control are not anticipated at this time, if it becomes
necessary to include, a separate scope and fee will be prepared.
7. This scope does not include documentation and associated public involvement
activities for compliance with Chapter 26 of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code. If
it becomes necessary to include, a separate scope and fee will be prepared..
8. Assumes that a tech memo (for a project using only local {City} funds) would be
adequate, and no NEPA document (under USAGE or TxDOT review) would be
required. If a determination is made that USACE permitting would trigger the
need for a NEPA evaluation, an additional scope and budget would be required.
B-9 of 9
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT C
Work Schedule
Attached Behind This Page
.......... . ....
Kenney Fort Bouieverd Extension
Exhibit C €
Work Schedule
ID Task.Name Cruratirsn Start Finish Predecet rter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 30 Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mat Apt May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
1 Notice to Proceed 0 days Mon 8/19/19 Mon 8/19/19
2 Task 1-Project Management/Administratior 360 mays Mon 8/19/19 Fri 1/1/21 1 «.�.. __..... _,�. ------
3- Task 2-Final Design 375 days Muir 8/1911.9 Fri 1/22/21 r
4 Revise Alignment(Segment 48) 15 days Mon 8/19/19 Fri 9/6/19 1 :;::..:
I
5 Revisde Drainage Analysis and Update 15 days Mon 8/13/19 Fri 9/6/19 1 f
Models(Segment 48)
6 901%Pians Preparation(Segment 46) 30 days Mon 919/19 Fri 10118/19 5 T _
7 903%OA/QC(Segment 481 10 days Mon 101121/1 Fri 11/1/19 6
3
8 913%Submittal(segment 4011 1 day Mon 1114/19 Mon 11/4/13 7
f
9 3 City Reocw and Comment 103 days rue 11/5/19 Mott 11/18/18
10 103 Plans preparation(Segment 49) 203 days Tue 11/19119Mon 12/16/19 �
11 100%11A/QC(Segment 48) 5 stays Ttte 12/17/19 Mon 12123/110
1$ 100%Submittal(Segment 48) 1 day Sue 12124/19 Tue 12/24/1911
13 Bid&Award(segment 4 0) 60 days Wed 12/25/1 Tue 3/17/20 12
14 Schematic Preparation(Segment 4C) 45 days Man 1/13/20 Fri 3/13/20
15 Schematic QA111C(Segment 4C) S days Mon 3/16/20 Fri 3/20/20 14
16 Schematic Submittal(Segment 4C) 0 days Fri 3/20120 Fri 3/20/20 15 �t3f20
17 '>Checnatic City Review and Commem, 10 days Mon 3/23/201 Fri 413/24 16
is 60%Pians Preparation(Segment 4C) 70 days Mon 4/6/24 Fri 7/14/20 17 � �r
19 60%QA10C(Segment 4C) 10 days Mon 7/13/20 Fri 7/24/20 18 T
20 60%Submittal(Segment 4C) 0 days Fri 7/24/20 Fri 7/24/201 19 .#7/24
21 C-ty Revoew and Cornme.nt 10 days Man 7/27/20 Fri 8/7/20 20 To
22 M Plans Preparation(Segment 4C) 70 days Mon 8/101/211 Fri 11/13120 21 �" v
f
23 90%QA/QC(Segment 4C) 10 stays Mon 11/16/2 Fri 11127/20 22
24 90%Submittal(Segment 4C) 0 days Fri 11/27/20 Fri 11/27/20 23 �llJt3
25 31J'Ji<City Review and Crtmi-em 10 days Man 11/30/2 Fri 12/11/20 24 To I
25 1E1€196 Plans Preparation(Segment 4C) 203 days lvinn 12/1412 Fri 1/8/21 25
f
4
27 113 %QA/QC(Segment 4C) 101 days Man 1/11/21 Fri 1/22/21 26
2e 100%Submittal(segment 4C) 0days Fri 1/22/21 Fri 1/22/21 27 'Ilzz
______._._....�............. . ........ ......
Task x External Tasks Manual Task finish-only i
Split External Milestone Duratian-only Deadline rr
Crate:Tue 7/16/19 Milestone ! Inactive Task Manual Summary Rallup Progress
Summary C""""""""" """""" t Inactive Mriestone Manual Summary i' E Manual Progress - -•---�
Project Summary inactive Summary start-only L j
Page C 1
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT D
Fee Schedule
Attached Behind This Page
f�a� f i- «ff«�«f e.«E-,iC' (roA iG«3<,,;; @ .t¢+5•tid�iE «6,1,�w9 A ltliR..jJ ^'3"• }{y E V M �t 3 :pf Q
'.t3"_�' "r�.S...w;a.. �«> «.�"+�: � s+.�..a<,-w� �`•�'� �c:. ,. «£«r�.� �.�'� ai'�`,�'f11I{1'.$,s ea"eA ah�-,�is�'e���9 afa._m°�=«i�vf�.vE yj'•�mn,> ;�=ST
end
E E
M3 rt lit
His 9
♦ E>v:
.� « ` ««`u ri
»e
Z $ +? nlb a;•sEs.o o ! ,w rsEsr r sws ce;-°xs�m a(«'�� 3v:r';•°E rile,m K wj�v x %t s:£ac 1 r a
i
J
R♦ .�w�'o� ^4 w w-�:$M�3'p �q�.•9 4��.-re �ti hd�t� «➢ 3R3 ��,.
0 ,
n t
raCD
Wpm
lit
iY xR Q fsafs Yt afEux'KR. MSM e? Kt MS t[t f i
R oirl sa,.p
� jl3 111111 1
T .
E � UP I
f
ffi
y.X: [ �iRi��I � � �i �»� KM tiE�M�+q,'*e [##A. «� i�Mi ��C h �-�y<<.=E3���-�.. .°+¢,y,��E� •�:
�x1t'w� 1 1s.#n �—�Ly7 l r�a�
n0XM{i
q•+�$A[y[:
•
Igglip
HIM
mull
+Fx1 )I � du
1 fills -ills.im• - Wrte x y w � ;:dK
scn� '