CM-2022-081 - 4/1/2022SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1
TO "CITY OF ROUND ROCK AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR
PREPARATION OF A TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
WITH
ALFRED BENESCH & COMPANY
FKA TINDALE-OLIVER & ASSOCIATES, INC."
CITY OF ROUND ROCK §
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TRAVIS §
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON §
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 to "City of Round Rock Agreement for
Professional Consulting Services for Preparation of a Transit Development Plan with Alfred
Benesch & Company (flea Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.)," called "Supplemental Agreement
No. I," is made by and between the CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, a home -rule
municipality, with offices located at 221 East Main Street, Round Rock, Texas 78664-5299
(referred to herein as the "City"), and ALFRED BENESCH & COMPANY, whose offices are
located at 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 400, Tampa, Florida 33602 (referred to herein as the
"Consultant").
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant previously executed the referenced "City of Round
Rock Agreement for Professional Consulting Services for the Preparation of a Transit
Development Plan with Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.," hereinafter called the "Agreement"
on June 10, 2021; and
WHEREAS, on December 17, 2021, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. merged with
Alfred Benesch & Company; and
WHEREAS, an Assignment of the Agreement was approved by the City on December
27, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify the scope of services, add additional costs in
the amount of $49,580.00 and extend the terms of the Agreement as set forth herein; and
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations in the
Agreement and this Supplemental Agreement No. I, the City and Consultant agree that said
Agreement is amended and supplemented as follows:
4 0-0887-91 3:�ss2
I.
Section l .01 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
1.01 EFFECTIVE DATE, DURATION, AND TERM
A. This Agreement shall be effective on the date this Agreement has been signed by
each party hereto and shall remain in full force and effect unless and until it expires by operation
of the term indicated herein or is terminated or extended as provided herein.
B. The term of this Agreement shall be from the effective date of the Agreement
through September 9, 2022.
IL
Section 2.01 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
2.0 PROPOSAL FOR SERVICES
Consultant has issued its proposal for services for the tasks delineated therein, such
proposal for services being appended to this Agreement as Exhibit "A" titled "Scope of Work"
and the Addendum to Exhibit "A," modifying the "Scope of Work," which document is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Section 3.01 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall satisfactorily provide all services described herein and as set forth in
Exhibit "A" and the Addendum to Exhibit "A." Consultant's undertaking shall be limited to
performing services for City and/or advising City concerning those matters on which Consultant
has been specifically engaged. Consultant shall perform services in accordance with this
Agreement, in accordance with the appended proposal for services, and in accordance with due
care and prevailing consulting industry standards for comparable services.
IV.
Section 4.01_ of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
4.0 LIMITATION TO SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant and City agree that the scope of services to be performed is enumerated in
Exhibit "A" and the Addendum to Exhibit "A" and herein and may not be changed without the
express written agreement of the parties. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the
2
parties agree that City retains absolute discretion and authority for all funding decisions, such to
be based solely on criteria accepted by City which may be influenced by but not be dependent on
Consultant's work.
0
Section 5.01 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
5.0 CONTRACT AMOUNT
In consideration for the professional consulting services to be performed by Consultant,
City agrees to pay Consultant in accordance with the "Project Budget" in Exhibit "A" for
services and the Scope of Services deliverables delineated in Exhibit "A" and the Addendum to
Exhibit "A." Total payment to the Consultant shall not exceed One Hundred Ninety -Five
Thousand Five Hundred Fourteen and 05/100 Dollars ($195,514.05) plus and additional
Forty -Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eizhty and No/100 Dollars ($49,580.00) for the
additional SCODe of Services set forth in Addendum "A." for a total not -to -exceed amount of
Two Hundred Forty -Five Ninety -Four and 051100 Dollars ($245,094.05).
VI.
This Supplemental Agreement No. I shall amend the original Agreement only as set forth
herein with no other changes in terms or conditions of the original Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Supplemental
Agreement No. 1 to be effective as of the last date of due execution by both parties.
CITY OF ROUND ROCK, XAS
By:
Printed Name: S /3!
Title:
Date Signed:
ATTEST:
By: _
Meagan , inks, Ci Clerk
FOR CITY, APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: LC
Stephan ,. Sheets, City Attorney
ALFRED BENESCH & COMPAN
By: —
Printed Name: i
Title: l POIL
Date Signed:
Addendum to Exhibit "A"
Round Rock Mobility on Demand Feasibility Support
Scope of Work
Introduction
The purpose of this task is to provide support for the City of Round Rock to assess and determine the
potential feasibility of on -demand mobility services. This work will include identifying mobility needs and
service gaps, determining how mobility -on -demand (MOD) services would integrate with fixed route and
paratransit services, determine the software -as -a -service (SaaS) functionalities required to support the
service, develop a concept of operations, and describe next steps related to piloting initial services.
This work will use data and analyses completed through the recent TOP process to identify market areas
conducive for on -demand services and to assess potential service design strategies and connections with
the fixed route network. The development of the concept of operations will include coordination with
staff and key stakeholders to assure operational and funding capabilities and capacity.
Task 1: Project Management
Because it is important to provide oversight, quality control, and transparency throughout the life of any
project, this task establishes the parameters for providing these services successfully, including project
administration and coordination.
Task 1.1; Kick -Off Meeting
A kick-off meeting will be held to ensure that staff and our project team are "on the same page"
regarding the scope, individual tasks and deliverables, schedu:e, and the goals, objectives, and priorities
for the study and the objectives for potential on -demand services.
During the meeting, we will discuss the specific methods and assumptions that will be used during the
identification and prioritization of service areas and the development of on -demand services. We will
establish a coordination plan and process to assure clear communication and dialog throughout the
study. This will faci itate full understanding of progress, analyses, findings, and recommendations, which
will support informed decision making.
Task 1.2: Project Administration
The primary purpose of project administration is to make sure the work effort is successful and meets
the intended outcomes. As such, bi-weekly email progress updates to the Project Manager and
coordination calls as needed to discuss key findings, service concepts, and decision points. In addition,
monthly progress reports will be prepared and submitted with project invoices.
Task 1 Deliverables: Kick -off meeting to review work scope, project schedule, monthly progress reports.
Task 2: Market Analysis
This task is designed to function as an analytical exercise to identify a set of areas within the Round Rock
service area that are conducive to on -demand services based on qualitative and quantitative evidence.
The first step is conducting a service area market analysis to identify potential candidate areas for on -
demand services. The second step is evaluating and selecting areas for which on -demand services will be
developed. In both cases, the service area market analyses and transit operational data and analyses
identified in the Round Rock TOP w'sll form the starting point for market analysis and service
Scope of Work
Addendum to Exhibit "A"
Round Rock Mobility on Demand Feasibility Support
development efforts within this task order. This will allow us to quickly target areas that appear to be
conducive to on -demand services and focus our efforts on these subsets.
Task 2.1: Market Analysis
The quantitative and qualitative analysis will examine a range of relevant factors and indicators key to
identifying mobility need within areas appropriate to on -demand services. Analyses will examine
socioeconomic, transit service, and goal -oriented indicators, each of which is described below along
with how they will be analyzed. These analyses assess location and extent of mobility needs and mobility
gaps in the service area.
Task 2.1.1 Socioeconomic Indicators
An examination of socioeconomic and demographic indicators helps us to understand specific
community characteristics at the neighborhood level and how mobility needs and travel behavior within
these areas relate to the region as a whole.
A GIS analysis will be prepared at the Census Block Group -level using data from the US Census Bureau.
Several indicators to be evacuated are consistent with Title VI analysis, which is particularly re:evant as it
identifies and locates target populations for whom access to mobility is vital. These target populations
include minorities, low-income households, and persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). The
analysis compares the occurrence of these populations relative to the general population within the
service area and identifies the geographic locations within which they are concentrated. Although the
Title VI analysis focuses on populations that have a high positive correlation to mobility need and transit
usage (propensity), the market for on -demand mobility services is also attractive to persons considered
to be discretionary riders, including young adults, workers, retirees, and persons aging in place. The
socioeconomic and demographic indicators that will be mapped and analyzed to identify mobility needs
include:
• Overall population and population density
• Low-income/poverty population
• LEP population
• Minority/Non-White population
• Age group, particularly youths and older adults
• Zero -car households
• Mobility -limited and persons with disabilities
• Employment and employment density
• Activity centers, major trip generators, land use characteristics
Task 2.1.2 Transit Service Indicators
Using information from the transit service information from the TDP we will examine where mobility
need is unserved or underserved as well as areas where fixed route services are not performing well.
On demand service should complement the transit network by providing first/last mile connections and
local mobility while connecting to a line -haul or trunkline fixed route transit route for longer distance
travel in the regional network. The design of each on -demand zone will allow for streamlining fixed
route services to ensure that they operate along an optimized routing to improve service reliability and
Scope of Work 2
Addendum to Exhibit "A"
Round Rock Mobility on Demand Feasibility Support
on -time performance, reduce travel times and revenue hours, and make the route function more as a
trunkline service rather than a collector service. These refinements improve the attractiveness of fixed -
route service for riders by offering a more direct and shorter ride. This also makes the transit network
more efficient to operate, which allows Round Rock the opportunity to invest saved revenue hours into
increased service frequencies. The objective is to create a better -functioning and more attractive
mobility network for Round Rock, current riders, and potential new riders by overlaying and integrating
a network of on -demand services that are connected to the regional fixed -route network at a series of
mobility hubs.
We will assess existing transit services and evaluate the quality of fixed -route transit service using
findings from the TDP, to help identify where fixed -route transit service is robust relative to mobility
need and where service is not. We will look at the current service levels and planned services and
service levels. Indicators that will be mapped and presented as part of this analysis include:
• Transit network coverage using a 1/4-mile rider catchment buffer
• Service span by day of week
• Headway (frequency) by time of day and day of week
• Ridership boardings by bus stop and load factors
• Route productivity
• Paratransit trip pair origins and destinations
We will look at bus stop -level ridership to determine if there are route segments that could or should be
discontinued in favor of on -demand services. This analysis opens up opportunities for 1) further
refinement of the fixed -route network and 2) definition of areas within which on -demand services may
be feasible and identification of likely on -demand service delivery types that may be conducive within
each area. These on -demand service delivery types may include Flex routes (point deviation), route
deviation, anchored, and point to point service types that fall within the category of MOD services. This
task identifies the potential service zones for on demand services and the evaluation provides clues to
which service type(s) are best.
Task 2.1.3 Gap Analysis
The next step in identifying potential areas for on -demand service is to match up areas with
demonstrated mobility need but no service, too little service, or underperforming transit services. As a
starting point, we will examine areas that were identified through the TDP with a focus on ensuring that
the right level of transit service is provided to the residents of Round Rock. Service delivery should be
based on a balance of market demand and service supplied to yield adequate service levels for service
demand, yet it also must be cost-effective in terms of the amount of service provided. Therefore, we wi'I
examine the gap analysis to cross-reference the socioeconomic indicators (existing transit needs and
latent transit needs) with the transit network and the transit service levels and productivity. This
analysis will highlight areas where mobility need exists, but where service is not provided or may not
have adequate levels (underserved) or where existing fixed route service is underperforming. We will
identify locations where an on demand service will likely make sense. The gap analysis is conducted by
overlaying the transit network on the layers of socioeconomic and demographics data identified
previously to identify service adequacy (transit route coverage, service levels, productivity) or gaps in
Scope of Work
Addendum to Exhibit "A"
Round Rock Mobility on Demand Feasibility Support
service coverage (transit need exists but is not served or is underserved by transit). These analyses will
be conducted utilizing GIS tools and documented quantitatively in tables and a series of maps and used
to identify locations where the market for on -demand service is strong.
Task 2.1.4 Goal -Oriented Indicators
This task effort identifies potential service zones relative to community goals and objectives. A set of
indicators will be created for analysis based on goals defined. The framework for this goal -oriented
process is to provide a basis for determining, evaluating, and comparing potential on -demand service
zones based on defined goals and objectives to facilitate the selection of those areas to be considered
further for on -demand services. The goals may include the following:
• Connecting people and places
o Expand access to mobility
o Eliminate transportation as a barrier
o Provide for localized mobility
o Provide first/last-mike connections to/from fixed network
o Connect jobs and housing
o Connect to major activity centers
• Driving economic growth
o Facilitate access to work
o Facilitate access to commerce
o Facilitate access to healthcare
o Facilitate access to education
• Expanding quality of life choices
o Eliminate transportation as a barrier
o Expand access to mobility, access to opportunity
o Facilitate access to life services locally and via connection to the fixed transit network
Depending on the approved set of goals and objectives, a series of qualitative and quantitative
indicators will be developed for the purpose of determining which areas are ultimately best suited for
on -demand services and which are most likely for these services to be successful.
This evaluation process would inc ude evaluating both quantitative and qualitative measures. For
example, we would assign quantitative metrics to qualitative measures, such as the use of scale factors
such as "low," "medium," and "high" that would be scored using numerical rankings (1, 2, and 3). In
addition, our process will include use of a weighting factor that will facilitate ranking or prioritizing
certain factors over others based on relative values of importance of the metrics tied to the goals and
objectives for this study and within the context of the community and Round Rock objectives.
An example of a goal -oriented indicator is the identification of areas for which access to transportation
is a barrier. Therefore, the goal -oriented indicator in this case would be a measure of how well on -
demand service will improve access to mobility in that area and, thus, access to opportunities accessible
via connection to the broader fixed route transit network.
Scope of Work 4
Addendum to Exhibit "A"
Round Rock Mobility on Demand Feasibility Support
cask 2.1.5 Use of the Analysis
This analysis will include matrix evaluation tables and GIS maps to present and evaluate socio-economic,
demographic, transit service, and goal -oriented indicators to support a defensible decision for which
areas should be considered for on -demand transit service zones and service design. We propose a data -
driven process to identify areas of existing and latent mobility needs. We will assess each area based on
existing transit service, either unserved, underserved, or served with underperforming transit services,
and assess the resulting subset of areas relative to goals and objectives for improving mobility, access to
opportunity, economic benefits, community benefits, and contribution to efficient mobility network
operations. Based on this analysis, areas will be identified for service zones and service design.
Task 2.2: Service Design
The focus in this task will be on assessing potential service delivery operations, operating requirements,
expected mobility benefits, and estimated costs or indicators of costs (VOMS and revenue hours) for the
service zones identified. The work in this task builds on Task 2.1 and findings and recommendations
from the TDP effort. This task will develop service delivery strategies for each service zone identified to
assess and compare relative costs and benefits Pkely to be derived from on -demand services. This
comparison allows us to rank -order potential each service zone to determine recommendations for
service zones to be prioritized.
The evaluation process will employ the following steps:
• Identify existing average daily ridership by stop for fixed -route service and trip pairs for
paratransit service and latent demand for areas not served or underserved within each area.
• Using GIS analytics of population, employment, trip generation, and assessing geospatial
densities, identify the neighborhood service zone boundaries and modal connection points
(potential mobility hubs) to the regional fixed -route network.
• Quantify density of demand relative to density of service supplied to meet demand at
appropriate service level response times by examining existing boardings by bus stop as well as
paratransit trip origin and destination pairs by time of day. It will include a calculation of daily
revenue hours of service required by summing the number of vehicles required to meet demand
during each operating hour of the day. This calculation reflects the variation in operating
requirements over the course of the day due to fluctuations in demand.
• Develop route and network modifications to improve fixed -route network operations and
performance that would be made possible through conversion to and/or integration with on -
demand services. For example, a poorly performing fixed route that follows circuitous routing
may be changed to a Flex route with a connection to the fixed network at a mobility hub if
service area characteristics (land use, roadway network, population and activity center density
and distribution) warrant. Alternatively, the same area may be more conducive for truncating
the fixed route and applying a point to. point on demand service concept that would serve
general public and ADA eligible persons.
• Identify on demand service strategies that fit best for each neighborhood under consideration
using metrics such as VOMS, vehicle revenue hours, response time, ridership, boardings per
revenue hour, density of demand, and density of service supply.
Scope of Work
Addendum to Exhibit "A"
Round Rock Mobility on Demand Feasibility Support
• Apply goal -oriented metrics to measure objectives such as proportion of the high transit
propensity population that will be served; percentage of population with access to employment,
healthcare, educaVon, and life services; and net change in transit revenue hours.
• Combine ratings from these analyses to rank each neighborhood, and then share findings with
Round Rock to support decision -making for the areas to advance into detailed service design
and development.
Task Deliverable: Techn=cal memorandum presents process, methodologies, findings, and
recommendations for identifying potential service zones and evaluating and prioritizing the service
zones to be recommended as most feasible for on -demand services.
Task 3: Service Recommendations
The task objective is to develop a detailed design for the on -demand service identified for each
neighborhood selected as feasible for on -demand service. This will involve the definition of an on
demand service delivery model that is convenient, cost-effective, and attractive to the public based on
the specific demand and service zone characteristics of each neighborhood.
Task 3.1: Develop Service Models
Task 3.1 will refine the service concepts from Task 2 into a concept of operation for the selected service
zones. This will include estimates of operating requirements (vehicles by time of day, revenue hours),
target service response times, operating rules for rider, driver, software, ridership and productivity
targets, performance metrics, estimate operating costs, fares, operating costs, how each concept will
interface with fixed -route service, and interface with paratransit services. There may be significant
opportunity to structure on demand services as a mobility for all service and, thereby, serve both the
general public and persons eligible for ADA paratransit under general public diai-a-ride ADA rules.
The specific on demand service concept may vary between areas. Relatively densely developed areas
with prox°mitt' to good fixed -route connections may be candidates for Flex services (point -deviation),
and areas that are less dense and more sparsely distributed may be better suited to a point-to-point
service. In some cases, the on -demand service may function more as a first/last-mile connector, and in
others the on -demand service may overlap the fixed -route network serving both local mobility and
connections to the regional fixed transit network.
In all cases, the service design objectives are to:
• Expand access to mobility and, thus, access to opportunity
• Attract non-traditional riders (choice riders, youths, older adults)
• Provide a more convenient and cost-effective mobility solution to address existing, latent, and
growing paratransit demand
• Create a greater return on investment for Round Rock services by transcending and transitioning
the traditional public transportation network to attract a wider and larger market of Round Rock
users.
Task 3.2: Software -as -a -Service (SaaS) Functionality
This task will identify the Software-as-a=Service (SaaS) functionalities necessary to support the concept
Scope of Work—� - --- 6 --- ---�----- � �---
Addendum to Exhibit "A"
Round Rock Mobility on Demand Feasibility Support
of operation and its interface with existing fixed route and paratransit services. While the specific
functionalities needed to support the service concept of operations will be identified as the concept of
operations is further defined, the functionalities will address:
• Ride hailing
• Fare payment
• Trip assignment to vehicle
• Pick-up and drop-off sequencing optimization
• Rider real-time service information
• Real-time service information for connecting services
It is critical that each on -demand concept of operation fit hand -in -glove with the SaaS functionalities for
optimal performance and to assure intermodal connections with other services. Our recommendations
will identify the functional requirements necessary for software/SaaS platforms used for managing and
controlling on -demand services. The primary deliverable of this subtask will be the development of a
functional requirements matrix for SaaS services which Round Rock may use to inform on -demand
service delivery concepts and for developing procurement documentation in the future.
In addition, we will review with staff the differences, costs, and benefits of operating on -demand
services based on a SaaS model compared for a Mobility -as -a -Service (Maas) model to determine the
most appropriate strategy for Round Rock for advancing on -demand services into pilots or permanent
operations. The primary difference being that with a SaaS solution, Round Rock would acquire the SaaS
capabilities (likely through license agreement for cloud -based services) and can use these services for
operations that Round Rock initiates and operates directly or via purchased service contract. With a
MaaS solution, Round Rock would acquire both the SaaS cloud -based capabilities and the operations
through a combined purchase and licensing agreement.
Task 3.3: On -demand Mobility Feasibility Report
Based on the service planning and SaaS development efforts, we will review and refine each service
zone model with staff to assure a common understanding and agreement with the findings and
recommendations for service zones, service concepts, SaaS functionalities, and a SaaS or MaaS strategy
for advancing on -demand services.
We will work with staff to thoroughly review services with the intent of fully understanding how on -
demand service in each zone will function and connect with the fixed transit network. This process will
include reviewing each service zone, reviewing the on demand concept of operations, operating rules,
response times, operating requirements, operating costs, ridership, and net impacts on ridership and
operations (fixed route and paratransit).
We will review the operational processes for the SaaS-associated functional requirements to facilitate
riders, operators, and the system. This wile include processes and rules for the service to function such
as ride request, passenger pick-up, passenger drop-off, fare payment, fare policy.
We will review of the SaaS functionalities such as data collection and reporting to meet NTD and Round
Rock KPI requirements. We will review strategies to procure SaaS functionality and deploy services
either directly or via contract operator or procure on -demand services through a MaaS contract. We will
Scope of Work
Addendum to Exhibit "A"
Round Rock Mobility on Demand Feasibility Support
work with staff to identify which strategy works best in terms of procurement, funding, capital, service
delivery, and contractual considerations. For example, if Round Rock is able to operate directly or within
an existing contract, then a SaaS procurement may be the obvious choice. If the service is to be rolled
out under a series of pilots, then a MaaS purchase approach may be a better initial step to allow
flexibility for future changes.
A draft report will be prepared and provided for review by Round Rock. Based on comments received,
we will refine the report and prepare the final report and submit it to staff. In addition, we will prepare a
presentation for the City of Round Rock which can also be used to share with the public.
Task 3 Deliverables: Report findings and recommendations describing:
• Service changes to fixed network and proposed on -demand services, including route maps,
headways, service span, operating requirements, revenue hours, vehicles, mobility hub locations
to connect to fixed routes, and capital and operating costs for each neighborhood service.
• On -demand concept of operations for each neighborhood, including key operating rules and
procedures, operating requirements, SaaS functionalities, connections to fixed network,
opportunities to serve paratransit demand, impacts on existing services.
• Scheduling/SaaS platform functional requirements matrix recommendations, key data collection
and reporting requirements.
• Assessment of service deployment strategies, SaaS (procure software but directly operate
service) or MaaS (procure software and operations).
• Feasibility report with recommendations for service zones, concept of operations, operating
requirements and costs, SaaS functional requirements, recommendation for whether on -
demand services will be operated directly or through a purchased service contract.
Estimated Duration:
The technical support to develop services concepts, assess SaaS functional requirements, and prepare
the project report is expected to take 4-6 months, depending on the number of duration of reviews and
the internal decision -making process within Round Rock.
Level of Effort and Fee Estimate:
The technical support described for this scope of work is estimated to require 338 hours of effort and an
estimated fee of $49,580. The labor rates, staff hours, and budget are provided on the following page.
Scope of Work 8 _�
Addendum to Exhibit "A"
Round Rock Mobility on Demand Feasibility Support
Round Rock On -demand Mobility Feasibility
Level of Effort and Fee Estimate
Scope of Work
City of Round Rock
ROUND ROCK
7ExA5 Agenda Item Summary
Agenda Number:
Title: Consider executing Supplemental Agreement No.1 to "Agreement for
Professional Consulting Services for Preparation of Transit Development Plan
with Alfred Benesch & Company f/k/a Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc."
Type: City Manager Item
Governing Body: City Manager Approval
Agenda Date: 4/1/2022
Dept Director: Gary Hudder, Transportation Director
Cost: $49,580.00
Indexes: General Fund
Attachments: SA#1, LAF
Department: Transportation
Text of Legislative File CM-2022-081
To execute a supplemental agreement to extend the Transit Development Plan (TDP), with Alfred Benesch.
This extension will provide the city with the key operating requirements to implement transit on -demand
by service zone within individual neighborhoods. The extension will include route maps, headways and
revenue hours. It will also identify mobility hub locations within neighborhoods in order to connect to
fixed routes and provide the operating costs for each neighborhood. A important objective of this
agreement is to expand access to mobility, attract non-traditional riders and attract a wider and larger
market of Round Rock users. The consultant will utilize the information and data collected for the Transit
Development Plan to create a better -functioning and more attractive mobility network for the City.
Alfred Benesch & Company
35 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3300
Chicago, IL 60601
Contract Amount $49,580
FTA Grant Funded
Cost. $49,580.00
Source of Funds: General Fund
City of Round Rock Page 1