The URL can be used to link to this page

CM-2024-020 - 1/19/2024TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION ANTIQUITIES PERMIT APPLICATION FORM ARCHEOLOGY GENERAL INFORMATION I. PROPERTY TYPE AND LOCATION Project Name (and/or Site Trinomial) Eagles Nest Street West County (ies) Williamson USGS Quadrangle Name and Number Round Rock 3097-312 UTM Coordinates Zone 14 E 62538o N 338020 Location Proposed o.8-mile (i.�-kilometer) long and 12o-foot (ca.,6.6-meter fml) wide (io.1-acre) new roadway from North Mays Street to ca. x goo feet (ca. 58o m) west of Interstate HighwA-Y 35 (IH-35) within the Round Rock city limits. Federal Involvement 0 Yes ❑x No Name of Federal Agency Agency Representative _ II.OWNER (OR CONTROLLING AGENCY) Owner Citv of -Round Rock Address Z24 U /V --° City/State/Zip Telephone (include area code) -2 Email Address III. PROJECT SPONSOR (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER) Sponsor Representative Address City/State/Zip Telephone (include area code) Email Address PROJECT INFORMATION I. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (ARCHEOLOGIST) Name Mike Mudd, RPA Affiliation Halff, Inc. Address u162o Briarwick Drive, Suite ioo City/State/Zip Austin TX 78729 Telephone (include area code) (512) 777_4599 Email Address mmudd0halff.com eJ6V (OVER) ANTIQUITIES PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (CONTINUED) II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed Starting Date of Fieldwork February 1% 2023 Requested Permit Duration 5 Years o Months (1 year minimum) Scope of Work (Provided an Outline of Proposed Work) Intensive archeological survey in accordance with the CTA Survey Standards. A detailed scope of work is attached. III. CURATION & REPORT Temporary Curatorial or Laboratory Facility Halff, Inc. Permanent Curatorial Facility Center for Archaeological Studies IV. I, Owner, .TION as legal representative of the Land i✓uLt.f'YtiCi%�- , do certify that I have reviewed the plans and research design, and that no investigations will be performed prior to the issuance of a permit by the Texas Historical ommission. Furthermore, I understand that the Owner, Sponsor, and Principal Investigator are responsible co pleting he ter of the permit. Z6 Signature Date V. SPONSOR'S CERTIFICATION I, , as legal representative of the Sponsor, do certify that I have review the plans and research design, and that no investigations will be performed prior to the issuance of a permit by the Texas Historical Commission. Furthermore, I understand that the Sponsor, Owner, and Principal Investigator are responsible for completing the terms of this permit. Signature ' _. Date VI. INVESTIGATOR'S CERTIFICATION Mike Mudd , as Principal Investigator employed by Halff, Inc. (Investigative Firm), do certify that I will execute this project according to the submitted plans and research design, and will not conduct any work prior to the issuance of a permit by the Texas Historical Commission. Furthermore, I understand that the Principal Investigator (and the Investiga a rm), well as the Owner and Sponsor, are responsible for completing the terms of this permit. Signature Date 11912024 Principal Investigator must attach a research design, a copy of the USGS quadrangle showing project boundaries, and any additional pertinent information. Curriculum vita must be on file with the Archeology Division. Reviewer Permit Number Type of Permit Texas Historical Commission Archeology Division P.O. Box 12276, Austin, TX 78711-2276 Phone 512-463-6o96 thc.texas.gov FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Date Permit Issues Permit Expiration Date Date Received for Data Entry I TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Ap arel plern nrlllnr reel uerFrt thc.texas.gov e h a Iff� Scope of Work Archeological Survey for the Eagles Nest Street West Project, Williamson County, Texas Prepared for City of Found Dock Prepared by Halff AVa 46767 January 9, 2024 Eagles Nest Street West Project Williamson County, Texas Introduction The City of Round Rock (City) has contracted with Halff to conduct an intensive archeological survey for the proposed Eagles Nest Street project in Round Rock, Williamson County, Texas (Attachment A, Figure 1). The proposed project consists of a circa (ca.) 0.8-mile (1.3-kilometer [km]) long and 120-foot (ca. 36.6- meter [m]) wide (10.1-acre) new roadway from North Mays Street to ca. 1,900 feet (ca. 580 m) west of Interstate Highway 35 (IH-35) within the Round Rock city limits. The proposed roadway would bridge Chandler Branch and IH-35 as shown in Attachment A, Figures 2 and 3. Because the project is being developed by the City, a political sub -entity of the State of Texas, it falls under purview of the Antiquities Code of Texas (Title 9, Chapter 191 of the Texas Natural Resources Code), which requires that the Texas Historical Commission (THC) review actions that have the potential to impact archeological historic properties within the public domain. Proposed construction depths are greater than 3 feet (ca. 91 centimeters [cm]) within portions of the planned bridge footprint and less than 3 feet (ca. 91 cm) in the remainder of the roadway. It is Halffs understanding that the project does not include any federal funding or permitting that would otherwise require compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The project area reviewed for this study is illustrated in the map figures included in Attachment A. Halff conducted a desktop review of local environmental and cultural resources background information to determine the potential for the project area to contain archeological historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or State Antiquities Landmark (SAL) designation. The Texas Archeological Sites Atlas maintained by the THC and Texas Archeological Research Laboratory (Atlas) was reviewed to determine whether any archeological historic properties, NRHP properties/districts, SALs, Official Texas Historical Markers (OTHMs), cemeteries and previous cultural resources surveys are documented within or adjacent to the project area. Background research also included a review of local soil, geologic and predictive modeling information to evaluate the potential for buried archeological deposits. Historic U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps, historic aerial photography and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data were reviewed to evaluate the potential for above -ground historic -age resources in the project area. This document is intended to accompany the Antiquities permit application submitted for an intensive archeological survey of the project area. This scope of work summarizes the results of the background research performed for the proposed project and outlines the methodology developed for the intensive archeological survey for THC review and approval. Environmental Setting The project is mapped within the Brazos River drainage basin (TWDB 2023) and Blackland Prairies ecological region (TPWD 2023). The project setting is that of a mixed wooded and open terrain bisected by North Mays Street, IH-35, and a stream crossing named Chandler Branch. According to the USGS Round Rock, Texas Topographic Quadrangle map, the project is on uplands ranging from 750 to 780 feet above mean sea level that flank the low lying and frequently flooded valley of Chandler Branch (see Attachment A, Figure 2). Recent aerial photography depicts a riparian setting within the Chandler Branch valley and mostly open prairie along the uplands to the west. The primary development within the project area consists of the IH-35 corridor and North Mays Street (see Attachment A, Figure 3). The surrounding area is devoted primarily to commercial land use_ In addition, the western project terminus is on undeveloped land according to recent aerial photography. e haLff � Eagles Nest Street West Protect Williamson County, Texas Soils and Geology A review of the Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey (NRCS 2023) revealed that the project area is composed of four soil units, which are described below in Table 1. A map showing the soil unit distribution is provided in Attachment A, Figure 4. According to the Geologic Atlas of Texas (USGS 2023a), the underlying geology is composed of the Cretaceous -age Del Rio Clay and Edwards Limestone (Map Unit Ked) formations. These map units are described below in Table 2 and a map showing their distribution is provided in Attachment A, Figure 5. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map data, the portion of the project area that encompasses the banks of Chandler Branch overlaps with an area designated as a flood zone (see Attachment A, Figure 4). Table 1: Soil map unit descriptions and frequencies (NRCS 2023). Potential for Map Unit Map Unit Name Map Unit Description Buried Acres 1 % In Symbol Holocene -age Project Area De osits Landform: plains CfB Crawford clay, 1 to Surface texture: clay No 2.5 acres 124.9% 3 percent slopes Parent material: residuum weathered from limestone Landform: hillslopes Doss silty clay, 3 to Surface texture: silty clay o Doc 5 percent slopes Parent material: silty and clayey Yes 2.1 acres / 21.1 /a slope alluvium over residuum weathered from limestone Eckrant cobbly Landform: ridges EaD clay, 1 to 8 percent Surface texture: cobbly clay No 4.6 acres 145.3% slopes Parent material: residuum weathered from limestone Landform: floodplains Tinn clay, 0 to 1 Surface texture: clay TnA Yes 0.9-acre 18.7% percent slopes Parent material: calcareous clayey alluvium Totals 10.1 acres 1 100.0% Table 2: Geologic map unit descriptions and frequencies (USGS 2023a). Potential for Map Unit Map Unit Name Period i Age Buried Acres 1 % in Symbol Holocene -age Project Area De osits Kdg Del Rio Clay and Cretaceous No 4.8 acres /47.7% n Geor etowFormation Ked Edwards Limestone Cretaceous No 5.3 acres 152.3% Totals 10.1 acres 1 100.0% mom halff 2 Eagles Nest Street West Project Williamson County, Texas Potential Archeological Liability Man Data The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Potential Archeological Liability Map (PALM) for the Austin District was reviewed to evaluate the potential for shallow and deeply buried archeological deposits with integrity. In general, the PALM data indicate an overall moderate potential for shallow and deep archeological deposits (Map Unit 5) in the project area. A high potential for such deposits (Map Unit 9) is featured along the lower terraces and channel of Chandler Branch_ A breakdown of the PALM data for the project area is below in Table 3 and a map showing the Map Unit distribution is provided in Attachment A_ Figure 6. Table 3: PALM unit descriptions and frequencies. PALM Unit Map Unit Description Acres 1 % 1 Low potential 0.9-acre 18.7% 2 Low shallow potential, moderate deep potential 0.8-acre 17.6% 5 Moderate potential 7.6 acres 175.8% 9 High potential 0.8-acre 17.9% Total 10.1 acres 1 100% Cultural Setting Central Texas is generally considered to have a high potential for Indigenous archeological sites and materials due in large part to the suitability of native Edwards Plateau chert for toolmaking and rich biotic resources afforded by abundant natural springs. The archeological record in Central Texas is characterized by extensive chert quarrying and tool -production sites and ubiquity of burned rock middens (Black 1989; Collins 2004). In general, the archeological chronology of Central Texas spans from the first well - established human occupations occurring in the Paleoindian Period approximately 13,000 years ago to the time of Indigenous contact with European explorers in the 161h century. Atlas Review A review of the Atlas conducted on December 12, 2023 revealed that the project area contains one previously recorded archeological site, 41 WM239, which is eligible for listing on the NRHP and SAL designation. No other listed NRHP districts/properties, cemeteries or OTHMs are documented in or adjacent to the project area. A portion of the project area intersects with a previous survey conducted in 2016 on behalf of Williamson County for the North Mays Street Extension project. Table 4 lists and describes the cultural resources documented within a 1-km (0.6-mile) radius of the project. A map showing these resources and the previous surveys performed in the surrounding area is included in Attachment A_ Figure 7. .•.e halff � Eagles Nest Street West Project Williamson County, Texas Table 4: Atlas Data (THC 2023). Distance Resource ID Resource Type Atlas Record Summary NRHP / SAL from Year(s) Eligibility Project Recorded kmlm Early to Late Archaic site with a variety of lithic tools, including dart points, arrow points, bifaces, and drill base. Diagnostic points include Bulverde, 41 WM239 Archeological Andice/Bell, Montell, Eligible Within and 1959; 1964; site Travis, Pedernales and adjacent 1984 Gower dart points. Burned rock middens observed on the surface that have purportedly been dug by amateurs during the 1950s and 60s. Historic trail Trail marker made from 41WM438 marker limestone with directions Undetermined 900 m 1980 to Georgetown 41WM1360 Archeological Surface scatter of lithic Ineligible within 240 m 2016 site debita a surveyed area 9371 FOTHM Historical Marker for NA Li 30 m NA Williamson Count Site 41 WM239 Site 41 WM239 was most recently recorded in 1984 by Prewitt and Associates. According to the Atlas record, the site was documented originally in 1959 ahead of IH-35 construction and later in 1964 by several amateurs and previously designated with the trinomial 41WM15. The project area intersects with the southern portion of the mapped site boundary. which encompasses the east and west banks of Chandler Branch. The full site boundary is at least 800 m north -south by 600 m east -west. As outlined above in Table 4, the diagnostic stone tool assemblage contains primarily dart points from the Early to Late Archaic. The site is situated on the low terraces of Chandler Branch with burned rock middens observed on a high terrace north of Chandler Branch_ The burned rock middens were found on the surface and have purportedly been looted prior to and after the site's original documentation. The 41 WM239 record describes one midden as 24 m in diameter, 1.2 m high and moderately looted and another measuring 70 cm high and partially removed by previous parking lot construction. Based on the available data, the site represents repeated occupation during the Archaic period as reflected in the stone tool assemblage and burned rock midden complex. Historic Map Review A summary of the historic topographic quadrangle maps (USGS 2023b) and aerial photographs (NETR 2023) reviewed for the project are summarized below in Table 5, mom MEN half w ... 4 Eagles Nest Street West Project Williamson County, Texas Table 5: Historic map review summary. Number of historic structures/features Map name and year mapped in the project area and/or adjacent Land use depicted properties Two residences are mapped approx.170- USGS 1967 Round Rock, Texas 200 m north, and one residence is mapped Rural and mostly Topographic Quadrangle 260 m to the south. A railway labeled Great undeveloped land (Attachment A, Figure 8) Northern International bounds the project area to the west. The above -referenced residences are not Rural and mostly 1954 Aerial Photograph visible. Construction of US 81/IH 35 is undeveloped depicted. pastureland Same as 1954 aerial photograph with Rural and mostly 1962 Aerial Photograph expansion of the US 81/IH 35 corridor in undeveloped progress.pastureland Same as 1962 aerial photograph with Rural and mostly 1973 Aerial Photograph completion of US 8111H 35 corridor and undeveloped frontage roads. An unimproved road follows pastureland Flanking the west banks of Chandler Branch I the IH 35 corridor Subsequent land use in the project area over time includes the extension of North Mays Street and further commercial development to the east and west. The sections between North Mays Street and IH 35 appear to retain a wooded and undeveloped setting along Chandler Branch. In addition, the section from IH 35 to the western terminus remains undeveloped. The historical map review revealed a low potential for extant historic structures. The portions of the project area that were not developed over time have a moderate to high potential for buried and intact archeological deposits given the alluvial setting, and local soil, geologic, PALM and Atlas data. UDAR Data LiDAR data were used in conjunction with historic aerial imagery and topographic maps to characterize the local landscape features. Depending on the elevation or relief they create, cultural features such as buildings, walls, or other structures may appear as deviations from the surrounding terrain and can be identified by contrasting shades of gray. The local LOAR data show no other human -made features in the project area other than the IH-35 and North Mays Street corridors. Nearby modern commercial development is depicted in the surrounding area and the Chandler Branch valley is depicted as darker shades of gray (Attachment A, Figure 9). The upland terrain west of IH-35 is also reflected in the LiDAR data. Methodology The results of the background research were referenced in the development of the survey methodology to ensure that a sufficient level of investigation will be conducted to identify all archeological historic properties potentially affected by the proposed project. The intensive archeological survey will conform to the Council of Texas Archeologists Archeological Survey Standards for Texas (Survey Standards) and performed by Halff archeologists, Annie Carter and Josh Cutler who meet the U.S. Secretary of the Interior (SOI) Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation under the supervision of Mike Mudd, MA, RPA, who meets the SOI standards and professional qualification requirements for Principal Investigator (13 Texas Administrative Code ]TAC] 26,4), Given the low potential for above -ground mom halff - Eagles Nest Street West Project Williamson County, Texas historic resources as evidenced by the historical map reviews, an architectural assessment will not be a component of the survey. Components of the archeological survey may include pedestrian reconnaissance, shovel testing, backhoe trenching, site documentation, artifact inventories, and digital photography. All exposed surfaces will be examined for evidence of archeological materials. The excavation of shovel tests will be done on a judgmental basis and conducted where the APE exhibits potential to contain buried and undisturbed archeological deposits. Given the location of NRHPISAL eligible site 41WM239 within and adjacent to the project area, the survey will focus on evaluating the site's condition and eligibility potential within the proposed bridge and roadway footprints. The site will not be investigated outside of the current project area. Pedestrian reconnaissance within the section of the project between North Mays Street and IH-25 was performed on October 13, 2023. During the field visit, the portion of site 41 WM239 that overlaps with the project area was carefully walked over to check for cultural materials on the surface. No such materials or burned rock features were observed on the surface within the project area. The Survey Standards for the proposed 0.8-mile (1.3-km) long project area require a minimum of thirteen shovel tests placed at an interval no greater than 100 m (ca. 300 feet). Per the Survey Standards, shovel tests will be excavated in settings that have potential for buried archeological materials, except on slopes greater than 20 percent or in settings with evidence of significant ground disturbance. Shovel tests will be 30 cm (ca. 1 foot) in diameter and excavated to the lesser of 80 cm (ca. 2.6 feet) below the surface or base of Holocene -age deposits. All excavated soil matrices will be screened through 025-inch (0.64-cm) hardware cloth or hand -sorted if clay and moisture content require. The location of each shovel test will be documented using a Global Positioning System (GPS) capable of sub -meter accuracy. Soil/sediment depth and composition, and the presence/absence of archeological materials will be recorded on standardized forms for each shovel test, which will be backfilled upon completion. If previous ground disturbance precludes the excavation of shovel tests, GPS data points will be recorded at each location along with photographs and descriptions of the disturbance. Shovel test intervals will be adjusted as needed to avoid disturbed areas while adhering to the shovel test schedule. All photograph locations will be mapped using GPS. Shovel tests will be augmented with backhoe trenches in areas with deep (i.e., greater than 3 feet [ca. 91 cm]) proposed construction depths, which consist of portions of the project area that overlap with the proposed bridge footprint and 41 WM239. The trenches will be placed on a judgmental basis to accommodate terrain, vegetation, and modern cultural features and care will be taken to avoid unnecessary impacts to site 41 WM239. The number of trenches will be dependent on field observations as they pertain to disturbed and intact soils and the presence/absence of cultural materials. However, Halff will make a good faith effort to place at least four trenches within the project area where it overlaps with proposed deep construction depths associated with the bridge footprint. Due to its upland setting, the portion of the project area west of IH-35 will undergo only shovel testing. Halff archeologists will monitor all trenching activity while excavations are in progress. Trenches will be a minimum of 60 cm (24 inches) wide, 4 m (ca. 13 feet) long, and excavated to depths that exposed the base of Holocene -age deposits. During each trench excavation, one 5-gallon bucket containing excavated fill from every third backhoe bucket load will be screened through 0.25-inch (0.64-cm) hardware mesh. Stratigraphic descriptions of a cleaned 1-m (ca. 3-foot) wide profile will be recorded, with photographs taken with a scale for each recorded profile. Standard safety protocols will be employed throughout the trenching excavation and documentation process, including the stepping back of side walls for trenches that exceed 1 m (ca. 3 feet) in depth. In ME B haLff �ra Eagles Nest Street West Project Williamson County, Texas addition, ramps will be excavated at each end of the trench to allow safe entrance and exit during the documentation process. The field personnel shall not enter any trenches until after the appropriate safety protocols are in place and the excavation machine is powered off. No personnel shall enter trenches with benched walls exceeding 3 feet (ca. 1 m) in depth. All trenches will be backfilled, and the ground returned to its original condition to the extent possible following the excavation and documentation of each trench. Site Recording and Assessment For the purposes of the intensive archeological survey, an archeological site will be defined as containing cultural materials or features that are at least 50 years in age or older. More specifically, a site will be defined as containing at least one of the following criteria: 1. a single cultural feature observed on the surface or exposed in shovel testing, 2. five or more surface artifacts within a 15-m (ca. 50-foot) radius, 3. two or more positive shovel tests/trenches located within 30 m (ca. 100 feet) of each other. Upon the identification of an archaeological site, the boundaries are delineated based on the distribution of artifacts and features found on or beneath the surface. Per the Survey Standards, a minimum of six shovel tests are excavated at no greater than 15-m (ca. 50-foot) intervals until two negative shovel tests in each cardinal direction or landform/project limits are reached. If shovel tests and other field observations indicate a negligible potential for buried archaeological materials, site boundaries are delineated based on the surface distribution of artifacts and/or features. Where sites are found at a depth greater than 80 cm (ca. 2.6 feet) below the surface, a minimum of four trenches are used for site definition unless other criteria can be used to constrain site size. Additional and strategically placed shovel tests and trenches are excavated as needed to adequately sample site deposits and are placed with the intent to avoid unnecessary damage to the site. All archeological features and horizons observed in trench profiles will be mapped, recorded, and photographed with a scale. A 30- by 30-cm (ca. 1- by 1-foot) test column will be excavated where such archeological deposits are observed, extending from the ground surface to the base of Holocene -age deposits. Soil/sediment from the column will be removed in 5-cm (ca. 2-inch) levels and screened. The survey will employ a non -collection strategy, meaning all artifacts observed in the project area are documented in the field and left where they were found. However, certain diagnostic materials may be collected as needed to evaluate site chronology and significance_ All encountered sites are documented on standardized forms with boundaries and significant featureslartifact localities mapped in the field with a GPS capable of sub -meter accuracy. The site data collected in the field are sufficient for a preliminary evaluation of the potential for NRHP/SAL eligibility. Electronic TexSite forms are completed for each documented site and submitted to the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory with site boundary shapefiles for permanent trinomial assignment_ Survey Report Halff will prepare and submit a draft report that summarizes the findings of the archeological survey. The report will conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation and provide recommendations regarding any additional cultural resources work requirements with appropriate justifications. Following a period of client review, the draft report will be submitted to the THC for review. After addressing any agency comments, Halff will submit a final report to the client and furnish HE halff' 7 Eagles Nest Street West Project Williamson County, Texas the THC with one final report copy containing the plotted locations of any sites recorded and one copy that excludes the site location data. Curation Pursuant to 13 TAC 26.17, and after acceptance of the final report by the THC, the survey report, field records, photographs and collected artifacts will be prepared for permanent curation at the Center for Archaeological Studies located at Texas State University in San Marcos, Texas. MOORE Ems - ENO haLff ENO Eagles Nest Street West Project Williamson County, Texas References Black, Stephen L. 1989 Central Texas Plateau Prairie. In From the Guff to the Rio Grande_ Human Adaption in Central, South, and Lower Pecos Texas, by T. R. Hester, S. L. Black, D. G. Steele, B. W. Olive, A_ A. Fox, K. J. Reinhard, and L. C. Bement, pp. 17-38. Center for Archaeological Research at Texas, San Antonio; Texas A&M University, College Station; and Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville. Collins, Michael B. 2004 Archeology in Central Texas. In The Prehistory of Texas, edited by Timothy Perttula, pp. 101-126. Texas A&M University Press, College Station. Nationwide Environmental Title Research (NETR) 2023 Historic Aerials. Electronic document, https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer, accessed December 12, 2023. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) 2023 Web Soil Survey. Electronic document, https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/ HomePage.htm, accessed October 4, 2021 Texas Historical Commission (THC) 2023 Texas Archeological Sites Atlas. Electronic document, https:Hatlas.the.state_tx.us/ accessed December 12, 2023 Texas Parks and Wildlife Division (TPWD) 2023 Texas Ecoregions. Electronic document, https://tpwd.texas.gov/educationlhunter- education/online-course/wildlife-conservation/texas- ecoregions#::text=Generally%2C%20Texas%20is%20divided%20into,%2C%20and%20the%20 Trans%2DPecos accessed December 12, 2023. Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) 2023 River Basins. Electronic document, https,//www.twdb.texas.gov/surfacewater/rivers/river_ basins/index.asp, accessed December 12, 2023. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2023a Geologic Atlas of Texas Viewer. Electronic document, https-//txpub.usgs.gov/txgeology/, accessed December 12, 2023. 2023b topoView. Electronic document, https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#4/40.01/-100.06, accessed December 12, 2023_ _ .halff - s Eagles Nest Street West Project Williamson County, Texas Attachment A: Map Figures ENNUI END MEN haLff END AMENDED[t 10 o Lake 7 Georgetown lecreatlonal t.eks W-em 29 p 0 0 f n c $� 6 r La na $LJ� � yltlte`' Cedar Park i 93A; 2769 Anderson Mill �175 Serenade J� Q 1 Georgetown Williamson W I L L I M S Q N Project Location ur �Y°r S1L, 1431 m o =, 3 n a 3406 i 2 J 78 Brushy Creek Round nd Rock Golds School Rd I' IMAP me Aa>ax� i Kip } J IN ' iamson sWells Branch anty Pflugerville 'I'dAVIS Jona#i Hutto 1 JIw. • J Legend ~ convTwrity college, So& W Crtys Paktea' Eagles Nest Street West Project - Project Location iw CONANP. Exi. HERE. Gainth. Williamson County, Texas Saf9Graph, METUNASA, USGS. EPA, NPS USDA: Mapper JC; Mai Map Date- 12/15/2023 County Boundary see: 1 150,0W 0 2 4 a Figure 1: Project Location Map NONNI Kilometers 0 1 2 4 :;: haLfF Miles Sour Conservation Service f S9it rob AeseruQir 1 i�4 Conservat r rc c _ � 5orl Site)tr Reservoir SOT G4Ex VO I C Project Location I it S i dwVf%-w-d r SK ... t c r�YY Legend d g Project Area Bridge Footprint ~ Na*mW Owwaphk. Esd ��n, MERE UNEP WCW,115G5, NASA, ESA, METI. NRCAN, GEBCo. NOAA, Intremenl P Corp. USGS Rmnd Rock te■s opoWapl* Cua&angbi Mapper 1C. Map Sale 124.000 Eagles Nest Street West Project g Williamson County, Texas Map Date' 12/15/2023 0 300 600 1.200 Figure 2. USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map Meters 0 1A00 2,000 4A00 halff Feet::: . ' 4 � � • '�K n �` 4 I �, yr � �.. f i ' `• , r j4 1 c ; 35 }� It Id im i I •'. �l 313. S.r I ` _ it ►; yi - I {i' Ali C"fit. L 43 .r *'fli t.•,.'UUils r?:Ir� � y � � _ -t:'�.;�' �{ � •''1��'�.1 OPO ,►►6LLI ~ 1 I ter'• r ij u �'. y "- •� 'f _� ff � - i} . y rr _ iy'y!"��'�- -� � F I�'I+ II Owl k IV r yIx Z f �iry-._roc •�i•#` r • � iF 1 , }� �i5� f %%fir. It 14 I . L -� Nt� Project O.W. Cedar P {yyy}}y}'YYYY �. ram' � � �i ' �� ' •�` �� u IN ' * PALM Score '. 1 -low potential 5 -moderate potential 9 -high potential �'o I 2 - low shallow potential, 6 - moderate shallow moderate deep potential potential, high deep potential f 4 - moderate shallow 8 - high shallow potential, �q. potential, low deep potential moderate deep potential t; 4 'Ail V. w u ,, -t F j ! �L � •�� 7 r 5� JJ flop `'1112, � vt rmu Project Location ' Cedar Par�1( r ��► ,r Legend N 1ety ewalrc. E � mn HERE NASA ESA. METI. NRCAN, Eagles Nest Street West Project Q Project Area 6EBCO, NOAII Increment P Corp., HOOT Austin HPALM, Mapper JC. Map Scale I G.Ow Williamson County. Texas Map Date: 12/15/2023 0 75 150 300 Figure 6, PALM Data Map Meters 0 250 5W t ,000 9;: haLff Feet t� r , �+}�..�t�"�� .�,�!r 4 - ,�-•pry . �� Y..�i-+� � � ':�`� �.' -{`r ran--r"'` ; . , , � l Y• I '�4 9T." ��;��. �' :. I+ - / Y:'♦ ,1,k-4� I4 J• /i[ItYV; I%CGY7fi 1 .7, py�_ ii ' S '�♦ ,4", % %L a;i �Y i -. ;N`:�--�'��' i ,.,,�,; • � .I � _tom + ," ' � •+, �`; ., j L i l i ..box �I•�, L� � :� G � "�:;�� ,+�'��y.,.�'''�r�{� •1 . / 1' L~ ��; r tip. .,•; "xj 't� �� I .~� r K r � . .q� t . �., 4�1,r�'./4; �� . , 4h�. L • +. . }.1 ` j .�;s!r.-.'E.. r,� it. } 5 r dp .a ,,� �•t}�.r..r�,> ,!4 ._ ��.s; yy i , .� I •+y7a;7��J �+ �r rr 4.'� .� fl��l�ys �'+ � f' , �+ � s�, � '�^`.♦� �i r'�sir ` � � S 4 �; R}r .. ��•r ^�� •` � �'' I 1 �` i� `- , Y '45y�iP �.I1♦" t y`RI•: . =u= i+r Y{7,+FT�'r ••�. ..*iF i %`ter 11 ,�;�'♦• , 1,••' ~ ` •, f • r y`r '* � �' ,.,)�,i' �•` _� �r • , 1 Imo;. I .}r. �r� ■ ',.. f .sue��' t ! I. I ' - t'.5 � ;t..,+,�•�) u V ,. Projbct r ' '� ''''r - '� ` -�4 •� - � ter. ��773-'{ 'y1, � � LociiUon Ilk II i� II+=rS4F Le ondw • • 4 f i 770 J Project Location r i *Lundr� r -" �d � Cedar P.W. i augervilI6 Legend ~ National Gawmpik Evl Cwffdn. g MERE UNEP WCINC USGS, Nara. ESA, MET1, NRCRN, Eagles Nest Street West Project Q Project Area GESCo. NOAA Inuen*nt P Corp. Tows Williamson County, Texas USGS 1967 Rowel Rock, Topopnaphic GuadrmVb: Mapper Map Date' 12/15/2023 JC: Map Scala 1 12,000 0 150 300 600 Figure 8: USGS 1967 Round Rock, Haters Texas Topographic Quadrangle Map 0 500 1 000 2000 I:: halfF Feet Legend NNational GooWadk, Eml. Gw"n. rSAi�NAS& EMEnMNRCANN,USGS Eagles hest Street West Project 0 Project Area Eaeo• NoAk hniemenl v Corp. Williamson County, Texas T S � Mapper JC. Map Scale Map Date: 12/1 S/2023 0 75 150 300 Figure 9: UDAR Map Meters 0 250 500 1.000 ENO halfF Feet