R-2024-072 - 3/28/2024 RESOLUTION NO. R-2024-072
WHEREAS, the City of Round Rock, Texas (the "City") is a participating and founding
member of the Brushy Creek Regional Utility Authority, Inc., (the "BCRUA"); and
WHEREAS, the BCRUA retained engineering services with Walker Partners for the BCRUA
Planning Level Evaluation—Phase 2A Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, Walker Partners has submitted Supplemental Contract No. 1 to the Contract to
modify the provisions for the scope of services and to increase the compensation by $3,124,207.00;
and
WHEREAS, the City desires to authorize the BCRUA to enter said supplemental contract with
Walker Partners, Now Therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK,TEXAS,
That the City Council hereby authorizes the Brushy Creek Regional Utility Authority to enter
Supplemental Contract No. 1 with Walker Partners for the BCRUA Planning Level Evaluation — Phase
2A Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project, a copy of said contract being attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein for all purposes.
The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and
subject of the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted was posted and that such meeting was
open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Resolution and the subject matter
hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act,
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended.
RESOLVED this 28th day of March, 2024.
CRAIG ORG , Mayor
City of ound ock,Texas
ATTEST:
M AGAN SP S, City Clerk
0112.211224:1871-582 3-8844
EXHIBIT
' �WBRUSHY CREEK
REGIONAL UTILITY AUTHORITY
A Pa rrnaraolp o/ Cedar Park. Leander. and Round Rock
SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT NO. 1
TO CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
FIRM: WALKER PARTNERS ("Engineer")
ADDRESS: 6504 Bridge Point Parkway, Suite 200,Austin,TX 78730
PROJECT: Planning Level Evaluation—Phase 2A Water Treatment Plant Expansion
This Supplemental Contract No. 1 to Contract for Engineering Services is made by and between
the BRUSHY CREEK REGIONAL UTILITY AUTHORITY, INC.,hereinafter called"BCRUA"
and Walker Partners, hereinafter called the "Engineer."
WHEREAS, BCRUA and Engineer executed a Contract for Engineering Services, hereinafter
called the "Contract," on the 27th day of September, 2023 for the Planning Level Evaluation —
Phase 2A Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project in the amount of$198,895.00; and
WHEREAS,it has become necessary to amend the Contract to modify the provisions for the scope
of services and to increase the compensation by $3,124,207.00 to a total of$3,323,102.00;
NOW THEREFORE,premises considered, BCRUA and the Engineer agree that said Contract is
amended as follows:
I.
Article 2, Engineering_ Services and Exhibit B, Engineering Services shall be amended as set forth
in the attached Addendum To Exhibit B. Exhibit C, Work Schedule shall be amended as set forth
in the attached Addendum To Exhibit C.
II.
Article 4, Compensation and Exhibit D, Fee Schedule shall be amended by increasing by
$3,124,207.00 the lump sum amount payable under the Contract for a total of$3,323,102.00, as
shown by the attached Addendum to Exhibit D.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,BCRUA and the Engineer have executed this Supplemental Contract
in duplicate.
[signature pages follow)
Supplemental Contract Rev.03/2011
0140.4634-66;4854-9704-2603 215829
WALK PART E S
By: cam..•
Aaton Afchbr, Vice President
03.12.2024
Date
2
BRUSHY CREEK REGIONAL UTILITY AUTHORITY,INC.
By:
Matthew Baker,BCRUA President
Date
APPROVE TO FORM
By: I— - a
Stephan . Sheets,BCRUA Attorney
3
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT B
ENGINEERING SERVICES
GENERAL
The current water treatment plant(WTP)capacity is 32.5 million gallons per day(MGD).
Construction is underway to complete the Phase ID expansion thereby increasing treatment
capacity to approximately 42 MGD. This Project consists of final design of the Phase 2A Water
Treatment Plant(WTP) Expansion to further increase treatment capacity to approximately 64.2
MGD. The capacity allocation for Phase 2A is 11.7 MGD to the City of Leander(52.4%)and 10.6
MGD to the City of Round Rock(47.6%). It is anticipated that construction of the Phase 2A
expansion will be substantially complete prior to Summer 2027. Bid and construction phase services
shall be provided as an additional service by supplemental contract.
ASSUMPTIONS
Engineer's assumptions apply to all tasks set forth in this Exhibit.
1) Phase 2A shall include design of the following project elements and facilities documented in
the Final BCRUA Phase 2A WTP Expansion Basis of Design Report:
a. Addition of a new treatment structure to the south of the Phase 1 central treatment
structure. The new treatment structure (Treatment Structure South) will include one
treatment train. Project facilities include a new raw water flow meter, hydraulic rapid
mix,four flocculation trains,flocculated water channels, sedimentation basin inlet
channels, two sedimentation basins with sludge collection equipment, sedimentation
basin outlet channels,settled water channel, sludge vault,filter inlet channels, and four
filter bays with associated underdrains and media;
b. Development of Treatment Structure South support building including pipe galleries,
administrative facilities, elevator and observation gallery. It is assumed that the half of
the support building will be constructed with Phase 2A, and the other half will be
constructed with Phase 2B. The building design will include the means to allow for
construction of the southern half of the building and providing a contiguous floor plan in
the next phase. The building exterior will match the existing Treatment Structure
Central, and the building will include a reception area to allow stair and elevator access.
It is assumed that the ground floor will be used for maintenance and/or storage and will
not include occupied spaces. An open air, covered walkway will connect the existing and
proposed treatment structures.
c. Improvements to finished water system including the addition of a 6 million gallon (MG)
clearwell, new vertical turbine booster pump, and valve improvements to the finished
water transmission line;
d. Chemical feed system improvements to the aluminum chlorohydrate, polymer and
sodium hypochlorite feed systems to meet TCEQ storage and capacity requirements for a
64.2 MGD facility;
y Walker Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
e. Sodium hypochlorite system improvements to replace the existing, temporary metering
pump and suction/discharge piping configurations;
f. Expansion of the disinfection basin;
g. Improvements to the recycle pump station and sludge dewatering facility including
upgrades to the existing washwater recycle pumps and an additional belt filter press
pump;and,
h. Control and automation.
2) Engineer shall prepare the construction contracts as competitive sealed proposals utilizing
the City of Cedar Park Division 0 documents(proposal form, agreement general conditions,
and supplemental conditions)and CSI MasterFormat specifications (6-digit, 50 division).
3) The design will be based on the federal, state, and local codes and standards in effect at the
start of the project.Any changes in these codes may necessitate a change in scope.
4) Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for Owner in any litigation,
arbitration, or other dispute resolution process related to the Project is not included.
5) Final deliverables shall be provided in electronic(PDF)format and 10 printed copies shall be
provided to Owner for review and filing. Drawings shall generally be produced as bound sets
of half-size(11 x 17)prints.
6) Engineer shall not be required to sign any documents, no matter by whom requested, that
would result in the Engineer having to certify, guarantee, or warrant the existence of
conditions whose existence the Engineer cannot ascertain. Owner agrees not to make
resolution of any dispute with the Engineer or payment of any amount due to the Engineer
in any way contingent upon the Engineer signing any such documents.
7) It is recognized that neither Engineer nor the Owner has control over the cost of labor,
materials or equipment; over the Contractor's methods of determining bid prices;or over
competitive bidding, market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, Engineer cannot and
does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not varyfrom the Owner's
Project budget or from any opinion of construction cost or evaluation prepared or agreed to
by Engineer.
BASIC SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1.0- Project Management,Coordination,and Meetings
1.1 Project Administration.
1.1.1 Project Management Plan (PMP). Develop and document the following plans and
procedures to coordinate administration of the contract:team communication,
quality management, risk management, health and safety, document control,
change management, and cost and schedule control.
1.1.2 Manage and coordinate staff resources,subconsultants,and project planning.
Conduct weekly team coordination meetings by teleconference.
OWalker Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
1.1.3 Prepare monthly invoices and project progress reports and updates for the Owner
website portal. As a minimum, monthly progress reports shall include a summary
description of tasks completed as of the report date,financial status of the project,
status of schedule for project, and identification of technical or other issues which
may have an impact to the overall project budget and/or schedule.
1.1.4 Provide and maintain a project schedule in MS Project format that is updated and
submitted monthly with each invoice.
1.1.5 Facilitate document control and document sharing for electronic filing of
documents. Develop and coordinate drawing and graphic standards.
1.2 Project Meetings. Attend monthly progress meetings with Owner for a total of 14
meetings. Participants include staff from Owner and Engineer, as well as key Engineer
subconsultant staff. Engineer shall prepare meeting minutes and submit for review and
comment within 10 days of each meeting.
Task 1.0 Deliverables
■ Monthly invoices and project progress reports
■ Project schedule(submitted monthly)
■ Monthly progress meeting agendas and minutes(14)
Task 2.0-30 Percent Design
2.1 Technical Memoranda (TM). Prepare a series of TMs to document and communicate the
scope, design criteria, and details of the following Project components. Prepare and submit
draft and final versions of the TMs.
2.1.1 Building space programming for the Treatment Structure South support building.
2.2 Define design criteria and major assumptions used in the evaluation and design of
equipment,structures, and alternatives. Develop codes,standards, and permitting
requirements that guide selection of alternatives, layouts, and equipment.
2.3 Prepare construction drawings at a 30 percent level of completion showing the scope,
extent, and character of the work to be performed by or furnished by the Contractor. This
level of completion shall generally include the following: cover sheet, sheet index, key plan,
general notes, abbreviations and symbols, hydraulic profiles, overall site plan, dimensional
layout drawings, grading plans, contractor layout area, overall and partial yard piping plan,
treatment structure plans and sections, clearwell plan and section, process flow diagram,
chemical feed system plans and sections, booster pump station plan, disinfection basin
expansion plan, key details, electrical site plans, process system architecture, and one-line
diagrams. One site visit will be conducted during preparation of the 30 percent design
drawings.
2.4 Prepare a specifications table of contents.
2.5 Prepare a 30 percent design opinion of probable construction costs(OPCC). Contingency
shall be set at approximately 30 percent for total project costs. The 30 percent contingency
is within the recommended contingency range for a Class 3 estimate based on the
OLA-1
Walker Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
guidelines set forth by the American Association of Cost Engineers for a design with 10 to 40
percent project definition level.
2.6 Submit 30 percent design documents to Owner for review. Incorporate Owner comments
into subsequent submittals and provide written responses to review comments.
Task 2.0 Deliverables
■ 30 Percent Design TMs described in Task 2.1.
■ 30 Percent Design Submittal(Drawings,Specifications Table of Contents, Opinion of
Probable Construction Costs)
Task 3.0-60 Percent Design Submittal. Prepare drawings and specifications at a 60 percent level
of completion showing the scope, extent, and character of the work to be performed by or
furnished by the Contractor.
3.1 Prepare construction drawings to a 60 percent level of completion. This level of completion
shall advance the drawings prepared for the 30 percent submittal to include additional
process mechanical and structural plans, sections, and details, additional electrical and
instrumentation sections, schedules, schematics, and details and supplemental standard
details.
3.2 Prepare specifications to a 60 percent level of completion. This level of completion shall
generally include the following: table of contents, select front end documents,
specifications for work related to major project elements, and specifications for major
equipment.
3.3 Prepare a 60 percent design opinion of probable construction costs (OPCC). Contingency
shall be set at approximately 20 percent for total project costs. The 20 percent contingency
is within the recommended contingency range for a Class 2 estimate based on the
guidelines set forth by the American Association of Cost Engineers for a design with 30 to 75
percent project definition level.
3.4 Submit 60 percent design documents to Owner for review. Incorporate Owner comments
into subsequent submittals and provide written responses to review comments.
Task 3.0 Deliverables
■ 60 Percent Submittal(Drawings,Specifications, Opinion of Probable Construction Costs)
Task 4.0-90 Percent Design Submittal. Prepare drawings and specifications at a 90 percent level
of completion showing the scope, extent, and character of the work to be performed by or
furnished by the Contractor.
4.1 Prepare construction drawings to a 90 percent level of completion. This level of completion
is a set of bid-ready documents with the exception of minor comments related to final
quality control, Owner review comments, and agency review comments.
4.2 Prepare specifications to a 90 percent level of completion. This level of completion is a set
of all contract documents with the exception of minor comments related to final quality
control, Owner review comments, and agency review comments.
OWalker Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
4.3 Prepare a 90 percent design OPCC. Contingency shall be set at approximately 15 percent
which is within the recommended contingency range for a Class 1 estimate based on the
guidelines set forth by the American Association of Cost Engineers for a design with 65 to
100 percent project definition level.
4.4 Submit 90 percent design documents to Owner for review. Incorporate Owner comments
into subsequent submittals and provide written responses to review comments.
Task 4.0 Deliverables
■ 90 Percent Submittal(Drawings, Specifications, Opinion of Probable Construction Costs)
Task 5.0-Final Bidding Documents. Prepare final drawings and specifications sealed and signed by
a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Texas and showing the scope, extent, and
character of the work to be performed by or furnished by the Contractor.
5.1 Prepare and furnish final drawings and specifications with incorporated compliance
comments and Owner signatures.
5.2 Prepare an OPCC based on the final documents. Contingency shall be set at approximately
10 percent which is within the recommended contingency range for a Class 1 estimate
based on the guidelines set forth by the American Association of Cost Engineers for a design
with 65 to 100 percent project definition level.
Task 5.0 Deliverables
■ Final Bidding Documents(Drawings and Project Manual)
■ Final Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Task 6.0-Special Services. Prepare deliverables for the following special services required to
facilitate the design of the Project and development of bidding documents.
6.1 Geotechnical Engineering.
6.1.1 Geotechnical Investigation.
6.1.1.1 Perform site reconnaissance and mark proposed boring locations using
hand-held GPS unit. Contact Texas 811 prior to mobilizing drilling
equipment to the site.
6.1.1.2 Coordinate and perform subsurface exploration program including a
total of 6 geotechnical test borings for the proposed Phase 2 treatment
structure. An estimated total drilling depth of 200 linear feet is
assumed (30 ft of soil drilling and 170 ft of rock coring), and the boring
depths may be adjusted during exploration depending on the
subsurface conditions encountered. Overburden soil and disintegrated
rock at the boring locations will be continuously sampled up to 10 ft and
at 5 ft intervals thereafter. When rock is encountered, rock coring will
be performed. Logging and inspection or the borings will be by
qualified engineering geologist or engineer. Backfill all borings with
cuttings and bentonite chips upon completion.
OWalker
Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
6.1.1.3 Complete bulk sampling of the surficial soils at 4 locations within 2 to 6
ft below existing grade using a backhoe for thermal resistivity testing.
6.1.1.4 Laboratory Testing. Testing shall include Moisture Content (ASTM
D2216), Grain Size Distribution (ASTM D6913 and D1140), Liquid Limit,
Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils (ASTM D4318), Unconfined
Compressive Strength of Rock (ASTM D7012) and Thermal Resistivity
Testing(IEEE 442-2017).
6.1.1.5 Survey locations of borings as placed and drilled.
6.1.2 Geotechnical Engineering Report (GER). Prepare a report using gathered data and
information to discuss the following.
6.1.2.1 Phase 2 Treatment Structure.
6.1.2.1.1 Estimated subsurface conditions and groundwater levels.
6.1.2.1.2 Foundation requirements including a net allowable soil bearing
pressure, bearing grades and estimated settlements for spread
footings and minimum dimensions.
6.1.2.1.3 Evaluation of the shrink/swell potential of the soils encountered.
6.1.2.1.4 Recommendations for site development in karst terrain.
6.1.2.1.5 Recommendations for floor slab support including a
recommended modulus of subgrade reaction for use in slab
design and capillary moisture barrier recommendations.
6.1.2.1.6 Earthwork recommendations for construction of load-bearing fill,
subgrade preparation, and compaction criteria.
6.1.2.1.7 Construction considerations and recommendations for additional
studies of needed.
6.1.2.2 Disinfection Basin and 6 MG Clearwell
6.1.2.2.1 Extract information from the 2008 Fugro report relevant to the
design of the proposed facilities.
6.1.2.2.2 Address the suitability of the 2008 Fugro report
recommendations for the specific footprint of the proposed
facilities. Provide additional recommendations based on the
proposed design.
6.2 Commissioning and Start-up(C&SU) Plan.
6.2.1 Functionality and Operability Review. Evaluate overall operability and maintenance
aspects of the Project at the 90%design development level. Focus of the review shall
be P&IDs, control descriptions, overall operability and maintenance aspects that
O&M staff will be subjected to upon Project completion.
y Walker Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
6.2.2 C&SU Workshop. Plan and conduct a C&SU Workshop with Owner staff. Discuss how
staff will be impacted by the Project and gain and understanding of staff and WTP
constraints related to C&SU. Discuss training requirements for assets installed as
part of the Project. Prepare a meeting agenda and meeting minutes.
6.2.3 Develop C&SU Plan. Prepare an overall commissioning and startup plan.The
Commissioning and Startup Plan will be the guiding document, intended to be
utilized by the project team, to understand the recommended approach to
transitioning the project from construction to operations with a fully trained
operations and maintenance staff.
6.2.3.1 Establish Systems and System Boundaries. Subdivide the project into
unit process systems and create system boundaries for establishing
manageable Functional and Performance Test Packages.
6.2.3.2 Develop Equipment Lists for All Systems. Create equipment lists for
each system to ensure all equipment included in each system is
captured.
6.2.3.3 Develop C&SU Plan. Develop a detailed C&SU Plan for the entire
project, including a detailed overview of all required testing and training
and the commissioning process for each system, as well as Project-wide
commissioning requirements, roles and responsibilities for each major
stakeholder, an initial preface of what is to be included in each system
identified, and initial plans for system testing.
6.2.3.4 Develop C&SU Schedule and Sequence. Develop, assemble, and
distribute an overall Commissioning Schedule and proposed sequence
in which the systems should be tested and started up.The
Commissioning Schedule will identify commissioning and training
activities in a proposed sequence and be developed in a traditional CPM
format.
Task 6.0 Deliverables
■ Geotechnical Engineering Report
■ Commissioning and Startup Plan
Task 7.0-Agency and Stakeholder Coordination.
7.1 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ).
7.1.1 Coordinate with TCEQ to obtain exceptions to the filter common wall rule, maximum
sedimentation basin SOR requirement, and maximum gravity filter HLR requirement.
7.1.2 Coordinate with TCEQ for permitting review of the project plans and specifications.
7.1.3 Update and submit disinfection CT study for TCEQ approval.
7.2 Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). Submit Contract Documents for TWDB review
and approval. Support Owner coordination with TWDB including progress reporting and
project reviews. It is assumed that additional environmental assessments and feasibility
OWalker Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
reports are not required and that support with submitting TWDB SWIFT abridged and final
funding applications will be provided under separate contract at a later date.
7.3 City of Cedar Park.
7.3.1 Coordinate to obtain a Site Development Permit including coordination with Fire
Department and Utilities as required.
7.3.2 Coordinate to obtain a Building Permit.
Task 7.0 Deliverables
■ Stakeholder and regulatory permitting agency meeting minutes(as required)
■ Applications for permits and approvals(as required)
Ru
Walker Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT C
WORK SCHEDULE
The assumed overall project schedule is approximately 14 months from notice-to-proceed based
on 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design durations of 3 months, 3 months, 3 months, and 3 month,
respectively. Regulatory agency approvals are anticipated to require approximately two months.
-Walker Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT D
Fee Schedule
Attached Behind This Page
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT D
COMPENSATION
Total compensation for services under Supplemental Contract No. 1 is estimated to be$3,124,207 as
shown in Attachment 1 to Exhibit D. Owner shall pay Engineer for Basic Services set forth in Exhibit B
on the basis of Lump Sum as described in Paragraph 1.0 of the Agreement dated September 27,
2023.Total compensation for the Project shall be adjusted from $198,895 to$3,323,102.
OW-Rer Partners
3/7/2024 engineers i surveyors
Exhibit 1 to Appendix D
Brushy Creek Regional Utility Authority(BCRUA) Project Fee Summary
Phase 2A Water Treatment Plant Expansion c Services asks 1.0-5 0
(T Be: ) $2.926,956
3/4/2024 Spec lel Sii c (Tasks 6.0 a 7.0) $195 2d9
Detailed Cost Breakdown Total wo/acf 33 124 207
Baelc and S cial Servlcee
Employee uv+as aRn. v,.... crww.waw.� swwcr.ne rrl.m..� caro+. ,-.,,,tcwi smm wn 10,
_ •,^• Tptal labor i obl
k ur"q� ryM.,"' "q u�i nynw s.�a.cu, .emn s,ep., gtts y 5v..r tsa TMel Noun Edd E pe• Total Sub EH°n Tobl Ett°rt
Tas
Efforts
Tasks. Current 1-1,911 Rete $305 $305 $290 $290 $160 $175 $175 $85 $200 $160 $120
1.0 Project Management,Coordination and Meetings
1.1 Pr°J eM Pdmm�stratnn 8 224 2 80 80 8 4 40 446 $ 112,840 S 525 S 105,530 $ 218,895
/.2 Pe°leet Mee6rge tt 4) 4 60 40 60 16 180 S 42,080 $ 809 $ 10,104 f 52,993
LO 30 Percent Design Submittal
2.1 T.d I Memors,Me 2 2 8 12 24 $ 5430 S - f 42,994 S 48424
22 Define Deagn C,f- 48 12 f 2,440 $ - $ 3,285 S 5,725
2.3 C_--Drae gs to 30 Percent 1 eve) 2 24 40 140 280 80 340 8 914 S 179,110 $ 333 S 288,515 $ 467,958
24 Spec4rztnrs TOC 2 8 10 $ 1,880 $ - S 5,255 $ 7,115
25 OPCC to 30 Percent Level 2 6 16 Si, 8 88 $ 17,350 S - S 10,899 $ 28,249
2.8 W Percent Sub-1ane comment Recovery 4 8 36 48 8 24 8 136 $ 27,940 S - f 28,395 $ 58,335
3.0 60 Percent Design Submittal
31 Constructwn D,,-,to W Percent Lave) 2 36 40 144 300 60 400 8 990 $ 194,130 $ 333 $ 454,604 $ 649,067
3 2 Sper firatare to 60 Percent Level 2 16 24 124 220 80 16 482 $ 98,970 S - f 29.169 $ 128,139
3101 to 60 Percent Leval 2 6 16 56 12 92 $ 18,050 $ - $ 12,501 S 30,551
34 60 Percent Su dwi ane Comment Recovery 2 4 24 72 8 24 134 $ 25,850 $ - S 29.658 $ 55,508
4.0 90 Percent Design Submittal
4.1 Cons=u Drewrgs to W P-M 1.eve) 2 24 40 124 300 40 360 8 696 S 174,170 $ 333 $ 342,397 S 516,899
4.2 Specmubom to 90 Percam Level 2 24 t6 160 300 80 2a 826 $ 128,810 $ 105 $ 45,524 S 174,439
4.3 OPCC to 90 Percent Leval 2 4 12 36 12 66 $ 13,110 $ - $ 14,129 $ 27,239
14 90 Percent Sutm�tal end CommeM Recovery 2 4 24 72 8 24 134 $ 28,884 $ - $ 30,511 $ 57,395
S.0 Final Bidding Documents
5.1 Feel D"e s ant So ifshoos 2 50 40 12d 300 120 312 24 972 $ 196,622 $ 1,103 $ 167,037 f 384,761
52 FineI OPCC 2 1 2 8 32 4 49 $ 10,020 S - S 9,244 $ 19,285
6.0 Special Services
61Oeotecbe,ral Frgireen,g 8 4 24 2 1 8 2 49 $ 12,630 $ 35 $ 49,106 $ 81,771
62 Agency aCommnsndornn9 eM 51en.up Pian 2 8 24 16 50 $ 12.948 $ - $ 69,404 f 82,352
7.0 Stakeholder Coordination
]1 TOED 2 2 8 40 4 56 $ 10,880 10,880
72 -D8 8 16 36 16 78 S 14,768 $ 70 $ - S 14,638
7 3 C of Cedar Park 4 80 40 16 8 148 S 25,418 S 211 $ $
25,628
Total Bmlc and Special Services Noun 26 495 256 1,178 2412 568 1,506 180 1 8 2 6,6]2 S 1,]62090 S 3,656 S 1,788,261
S ],124,207
Total Basic and Special SeMces Labor Effon f 7,979 $ 151,768 $ 74,936 S 343,986 $ 389,606 f 100,604 $ 266,014 $ 15,477 $ 200 S 1,280 $ 240
3/42024
�
}kt
�f)
.- ------ �--- ---- -- -- --- -
f �
f
2E -
!
�,. .
$!|%
co
I `
� |) �
E. !
� }
� ! . !|#_!
f ft |a
; , !! a: | !! ■ . , !! |\
k|f+lf |w�! So
#(t\!l�9 ■f\k
; !!! l:l�z� o=�!, !! _q !
r|ƒ(k|{\
ilf �f! ' (!! ■i)! z !!)!!l, � ; ; �!^±
&��!l0. ,,�e, ��,0«=�: £,� �;■� ,
It:=2;:====:;2==■;;;;:=2:;:2:r:
�
!a}
!$
�$!
!! �lfR■# !®:§ ��§_ �! ®! . •
]� £# ;2�-e; !k§K �2«■ (� i# k
-- ------ ---- ---- -- -- --- -
} E ,
;!
§) ! ®
-
${2!
fIRNcc
§ \ /
■ k§k!!» ® !!!■ !a k«
I
�
|
! �
) �
] $ ) )$)! E.
! !,_lA�,�: _■ ,«
!292 F 9 _ : ;= r . r�-
§ !!k! !�w{! !(��!l���l �{ . |\%
E 15
(f ( )$§■ §!!t(»!! °! $)§! ;