CM-2025-113 - 4/25/2025STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON §
SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT NO. 1
TO CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
FIRM: HDR ENGINEERING, INC. ("Engineer")
ADDRESS: 710 Hesters Crossing, Suite 150, Round Rock, TX 78681-7838
PROJECT: US 79 from IH 35 to AW Grimes
This Supplemental Contract No. 1 to Contract for Engineering Services is made by and between
the City of Round Rock, Texas, hereinafter called the "City" and HDR Engineering, Inc.,
hereinafter called the "Engineer."
WHEREAS, the City and Engineer executed a Contract for Engineering Services, hereinafter
called the "Contract," on the 27th day of February, 2025 for the US 79 from IH 35 to AW Grimes
Project in the amount of $1,389,880.80; and
WHEREAS, it has become necessary to amend the Contract to modify the provisions for the scope
of services;
NOW THEREFORE, premises considered, the City and the Engineer agree that said Contract is
amended as follows:
Article 2, Engineering Services and Exhibit B, Engineering_ Services shall be removed and replaced
in its entirety with the attached Addendum to Exhibit B.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Engineer have executed this Supplemental Contract
in duplicate.
[signature pages follow)
upple�TC t /t
0 199.202502, 4906-9718-8916
Rev.06/16
84275
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
By:
Digitally signed by Word,
Justin
Date: 2025.04.15
10:59:43-05'00'
Justin A. Word, Sr Vice President
04/15/2025
Date
Supplemental Contract Rev.06/16
0199 202502, 4906-9718-8916 84275
Printed Name��� 136�
Title: / �G
Date Signed:
Supplemental Contract
0199 202502,4906-9718-8916
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephanie L. Sandre, City Attorney
Rev.06l16
84275
City of Round Rock Work Authorization No. 1
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBIT B
ENGINEERING SERVICES
US 79 FROM IH-35 TO A.W. GRIMES
The Engineer shall provide preliminary engineering services for the revision of a schematic design, re-
evaluation of environmental documents, public involvement, data collection, conceptual traffic control,
preliminary drainage design, surveying and mapping, utility engineering investigation, and utility
coordination for US 79 from IH-35 to A.W. Grimes located within the City of Round Rock.
ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES
The Engineer shall revise the horizontal and vertical alignments for a proposed roadway schematic from
IH 35 to Heritage Center Circle that includes design criteria, plan and profile, existing and proposed
typical sections, existing and projected traffic volumes, and superelevation. The Engineer shall review and
revised the approved US 79 schematic based on the latest Roadway Design Manuel. The Engineer shall
furnish Microsoft Office, MicroStation and OpenRoads computer generated media containing the roadway
schematic layout to the City. Supporting attachments and exhibits shall accompany the schematic layout.
MicroStation and OpenRoads computer generated files containing the roadway design schematic shall be
fully compatible with the software used by the City without further modification or conversion.
The Engineer shall prepare preliminary drawings to identify potential impacts and constraints within the
project corridor, including impacts to the nature, cultural, and human environment. The potential impacts
and constraints identified must include existing and proposed utilities (both public and private), structures,
burial grounds, neighborhood communities, historical landmarks, and undeveloped areas. Potential utility
conflicts and structural impediments must be identified as such. The Engineer shall propose alternative
alignments that avoid or minimize displacements and damages and prepare additional attachments or
exhibits required to illustrate a preferred alternative alignment. The Engineer shall assist the City with
agency meetings during the development of the schematic design as requested by the City. If requested
by the City, the Engineer shall prepare a Notice and Opportunity to Comment and assist the City with
stakeholder meetings, public meetings, and a public hearing, if requested.
An itemization of the schematic design and engineering work activity to be performed under this contract
is detailed below. The Engineer shall prepare designs in accordance with the latest version of:
A. Roadway Design Manual, published by TxDOT
B. Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, published by the American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO);
C. Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and
Bridges, published by TxDOT;
D. Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD), published by TxDOT;
E. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, published by the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) 91h Edition (May 2020);
F. Bridge Design Manual — LRFD, published by TxDOT Sept 2024
G. Hydraulic Design Manual, published by TxDOT;
Page 1 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
When design criteria are not identified in these manuals, the Engineer shall notify the City and request
direction.
110.1. Schematic Design — General Tasks.
A. ROW Property Base Map
The Engineer shall obtain information on existing ROW, easements, and property
information from as -built plans, ROW maps, and tax records. The Engineer shall
prepare a base map depicting the information.
B. Typical Sections
The Engineer shall develop both existing and proposed typical sections that depict the
number and type of lanes, shoulders, median width and type, curb offsets, cross slope,
border width, clear zone widths, bicycle and pedestrian accommodations (if needed),
and ROW limits.
C. Environmental Constraints
The Engineer shall evaluate, and document impacts to environmentally sensitive sites (as
identified by the Engineer and verified by the City) during the schematic design process.
Environmentally sensitive sites include natural, cultural, and the human environment.
Examples are historic and archeological resources, burial grounds, neighborhood
communities and residential areas, farmland, floodplains, wetlands, endangered
species, rare habitats, wildlife corridors, wildlife crossings, parks and nature preserves,
geologic features, undeveloped areas, and significant trees.
D. Drainage
Data Collection: The Engineer shall use data from as -built plans, subdivision plans,
FEMA maps, and the preliminary Williamson County Atlas 14 models (assumed to
be best available data) to locate drainage outfalls and to determine existing storm
sewer and culvert sizes, design flows, and water surface elevations for use in the
design of roadway geometry.
2. Cross Drainage: The Engineer shall conduct a schematic level cross drainage
analysis to determine and evaluate the adequacy of the ROW needed to
accommodate the proposed roadway and drainage system. The cross drainage
analysis must:
a. identify potential impacts to adjacent properties for the 100-year existing and
ultimate watershed conditions floodplain extents dueto proposed highway
improvements
b. identify the water surface elevations at cross drainage locations (four
locations identified) for the Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) of: 50%,
20%, 10%, 4%, 2%, 1%, and 0.2% storm events
c. review and evaluate TxDOT culvert inspection reports and video to determine
integrity of existing cross drainage culverts
d. provide overall drainage area map
e. evaluate the opportunity to minimize impacts to adjacent properties
f. coordinate with the City Floodplain Administrator (assume two coordination
meetings.)
Page 2of21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
g. prepare cross drainage report section to include methodology, assumptions,
and exhibits to be included in the schematic drainage report.
3. Storm Drain Trunk Lines: The Engineer shall conduct schematic level analysis of
storm drain trunk lines to determine pipe sizes. The storm drain trunk line sizing
must:
a. identify adjacent properties that will convey runoff within the ROW
b. identify and locate outfalls for potential internal drainage
c. determine peak flows, using rational method, to size trunk line pipes at
regular intervals
d. prepare cost estimate for the schematic storm drain system
e. prepare storm drain trunk line report section to include methodology,
assumptions, and exhibits to be included in the schematic drainage report.
4. Detention Needs Analysis: The Engineer shall conduct a storm water detention
needs analysis to evaluate potential peak flow impacts due to proposed schematic
roadway improvements. This effort will include impact analysis for runoff leaving
right-of-way, including HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS analysis of Onion Branch and
Brushy Creek. For instances where increased flows do not discharge directly into
receiving streams, analysis of conveyance capacity and impacts to structures will
be assessed.
5. Detention Volume Analysis: If detention is needed, the Engineer will determine the
approximate volume and footprint area of the detention pond(s) to estimate land
acquisition. Detail design of the pond grading and outflow control structure is not
included in this scope. A cost estimate will be prepared for this schematic level
analysis. Engineer shall prepare detention needs report section to include
methodology, assumptions, and exhibits to be included in the schematic drainage
report.
6. Water Quality Needs: For project area located within the Edwards Aquifer
Recharge Zone and Transition Zone, the Engineer shall follow the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Edwards Aquifer rules. The
Engineer shall design water quality Best Management Practices (BMP) in
accordance with the latest editions of RG-348 — Complying withthe Edwards
Aquifer Rules Technical Guidance on Best Management Practices (July 2005);
RG-348 Addendum Sheet (July 2012), or latest edition. As part of this work, the
Engineer shall perform the following:
a. BMP analysis: The Engineer shall locate BMPs previously permitted under
the TCEQ Edwards Aquifer rules that might be impacted by the project. The
Engineer shall determine the amount of total suspended solids (TSS) being
treated under these permitted BMPs.
b. TSS load calculations: The Engineer shall develop TSS load calculations to
determine the TSS amount required to be treated under the Edwards Aquifer
rules. This calculation is based on the increase in the amount of impervious
cover within the project area, based on updates to the schematic. The
Engineer will determine 80% of the increase in TSS load resulting from the
development on the project.
c. De facto water quality: The Engineer shall determine the amount of de facto
water quality being treated via grassy swales (GS) and vegetative filter strips
Page 3 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
(VFS). These locations are generally in areas where the existing geometry
meets TCEQ standards for water quality and were not permitted as TCEQ
BMPs under the Edwards Aquifer rules.
d. TSS removal determination: The Engineer shall utilize the TCEQ calculation
spreadsheet to determine the total amount of TSS removal required for the
project. Engineer shall determine size and preliminary layout of
StormTroopers to treat increased TSS loads
e. Determine Hazard Material Trap (HMT) needs. Two existing HMT's are
located at the Onion Branch crossing and will be evaluated.
f. Prepare water quality section to include methodology, assumptions, and
exhibits in the schematic drainage report. Report shall discuss the TSS
removal required for the project and delineate the design approach for the
water quality BMPs (StormTroopers). The Engineer shall coordinate with the
City for preferred treatment options and determine necessary drainage
easements required for the water quality BMP. The Engineer shall provide
cost estimates for the BMPs and necessary drainage easements.
7. Schematic Drainage Report: Prepare schematic drainage report to include the
cross drainage analysis, storm drain trunk line, detention needs, and the water
quality analysis, which must be signed and sealed by a professional engineer
licensed in Texas, must include applicable hydrologic and hydraulic models (e.g.,
HEC-RAS, HEC-HMS). The Engineer shall prepare a final drainage study in
accordance with one or more of the following: TxDOT Hydraulic Design Manual,
and other specific guidance provided by the City. If requested by the City, the
Engineer shall evaluate the adequacy of the existing drainage structures;
otherwise, the Engineer shall not evaluate the adequacy of the existing drainage
structures.
E. ROW Requirements
The Engineer shall determine the ROW requirements based on the proposed horizontal
and vertical alignments, typical sections, design cross sections, access control, terrain,
construction requirements, drainage, clear zone, maintenance, intelligent transportation
system (ITS), and environmental constraints and mitigation requirements.
F. Construction Sequence
The Engineer shall evaluate and document the requirements for construction staging
and traffic control throughout the development of schematic design. The Engineer shall
provide construction phasing assumptions to the City as requested and provide
preliminary traffic control plan (TCP) layouts.
G. Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations
The Engineer shall comply with the United States Department of Transportation Policy
Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and
Recommendations. The inclusion of bicycle and pedestrian facilities must be evaluated
when the project is scoped. Public input when applicable, as well as local city and
metropolitan planning organization for bicycle and pedestrian plans must be considered
in this evaluation.
H. Preliminary Design Conference
The Engineer shall prepare and submit a preliminary Design Summary Report (DSR) to
the City for review and approval and shall attend an initial kick-off meeting to establish
and agree on fundamental aspects, basic features, concepts, and design criteria.
Page 4of21
City of Round Rock Work Authorization No. 1
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Roadway Design Criteria
The Engineer shall develop the roadway design criteria based on the latest version of
the TxDOT Roadway Design Manual and AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets guidelines. The design criteria must include the following
roadway design elements: design speed, lane and shoulder widths, pavement structure
and slopes, horizontal curvatures, horizontal and vertical clearances, range of vertical
profile grades, and side slopes. If there is a discrepancy between the two sources, the
TxDOT Roadway Design Manual will govern unless otherwise directed by the City.
Alternative Evaluation
1. Alternative 1: Mays St Location:
a. The Engineer shall coordinate with M35 Design teams for the design of IH-35
and US 79 interchange including the direct connectors (assumed 4
meetings)
b. The Engineer shall optimize the Northbound to Eastbound Direct Connector
and Westbound to Southbound Direct Connector design to determine tie-in
limits west of Heritage Center Circle.
K. Right of Entry
The Engineer shall be responsible for obtaining right -of -entry (ROEs). ROEs are
anticipated for property owners where the approved 2020 Schematic shows proposed
ROW.
L. Preliminary Driveway Design
The Engineer shall determine the preliminary limits of construction for driveways
impacted by proposed project. The Engineer shall provide a list of driveways where
driveway licenses will be required. Driveway profiles shall be shown on a roll plot.
110.2. Geometric Design Schematics.
The Engineer shall provide an updated geometric design schematic based on the approved
2020 schematic completed by LAN. The Engineer shall use Bentley OpenRoads tools in
performing this task. The geometric design schematic must include both a plan view and
profile view.
A. The geometric schematic plan view must contain the following design elements:
1. Bentley OpenRoads calculated roadway alignments for mainlanes, ramps, and
cross streets at major intersections and grade separations
2. Horizontal curve data shown on plan view at relevant stations or in tabular format
3. Pavement edges, curb lines, bicycle and pedestrian accommodations to include
Shared Use Paths, sidewalks, and/or shoulders for roadway improvements
4. Typical sections of existing and proposed roadways
5. Proposed bridge structures, including:
a. Bridge abutment, bent, deck, girder, and rail type and locations
b. Preliminary Bridge Quantities
C. Bridge Typical Section Geometry
d. Bridge hydraulic coordination
6. Proposed retaining wall and sound wall locations
Page 5of21
City of Round Rock Work Authorization No. 1
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
7. Proposed cross -drainage structures with outfall flow arrows and significant
drainage features or waterways identified
8. Existing utilities and proposed utilities
9. Existing property lines and respective property ownership information
10. Existing ROW and easements
11. Proposed ROW and easements adequate for preparation of ROW maps
12. Waters of the US (WOTUS)
13. Control -of -access limits
14. Existing and projected traffic volumes
15. Location and text of the existing and proposed guide signs and the preliminary
locations for changeable message signs
16. Lane lines, shoulder lines, and direction of traffic flow arrows indicating the number
of lanes on roadways
B. The geometric schematic profile view must contain the following design elements:
1. Calculated profile grade and vertical curve data including "K" values for curves and
sight distance values for crest vertical curves on the mainlanes
2. Existing ground line profiles along the centerline
3. Grade separations and overpasses/underpasses including preliminary abutment
and bent locations, vertical clearances, assumed beam type, depth, span lengths
4. Calculated vertical clearances at grade separations (overpasses/underpasses)
5. Anticipated cross -drainage structures with approximate inlet and outfall elevations
6. Proposed ditch grading (special grading), if it does not follow the typical section.
7. Approximate locations of existing and proposed major utility crossings
8. The calculated profile grade for ramps and cross streets will be shown on separate
Supplemental Profile rolls
110.3. Cross -Sections.
The Engineer shall use a Bentley 3D OpenRoads model to generate preliminary cross -
sections at 50 feet intervals. The Engineer shall determine earthwork volumes for use in the
cost estimate. The Engineer shall prepare 11 inch x17 inch of the cross- sections and deliver
as a .pdf.
110.4. Preliminary Construction Sequence.
The Engineer shall prepare preliminary construction sequence layouts in conjunction with the
geometric design schematic depicting the phasing and traffic detours anticipated to safely
convey traffic. The layouts must demonstrate that adequate horizontal and vertical
alignments are maintained, sufficient lane widths and shoulder widths or barrier offsets are
feasible, and construction zones are adequate for constructability of proposed features.
Proposed construction detours must provide adequate superelevation as necessary. The
layouts must indicate how existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities are accommodated for
each phase.
110.5. Preliminary Cost Estimate.
The Engineer shall prepare a preliminary cost estimate for the project, including the costs of
construction, required ROW and associated improvements. Current State unit bid prices must
Page 6 of 21
City of Round Rock Work Authorization No. 1
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
be used in preparation of the estimate.
110.6. Schematic Design Project Deliverables.
In conjunction with the performance of the services included under Function Code 110 of this
attachment, the Engineer shall provide the following draft and final documents and
associated electronic files as applicable
A. Draft and Final copies of the preliminary drainage study
B. Draft and final copies of the geometric schematic layouts (1 inch = 100 feet)
C. Draft and final copies of the design schematic cross -sections on 11 inch x Winch cut
sheets
D. Electronic 3D model copy of the preliminary cross -sections created using OpenRoads
tools
E. Electronic submittal of the hydrologic and hydraulic model digital files from the drainage
study
F. Copies of the preliminary construction sequence layouts in a roll plot
G. Cost estimates for each milestone submittal
H. KMZ or KML file of conceptual design schematic created from applicable DGN files for
reviewing in Google Earth
I. Final schematic 3D model created using OpenRoads software
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
120.1. Environmental Documentation Standards.
Each environmental service provided by the Engineer must have a deliverable. Deliverables
must summarize the methods used for the environmental services and the results achieved.
The summary of results must be sufficiently detailed to provide satisfactory basis for thorough
review by the City, FHWA, and (where applicable) other agencies with regulatory oversight.
Deliverables must meet regulatory requirements for legal sufficiency and adhere to the
requirements for reports enumerated in the City's National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
A. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Review
For each deliverable, the Engineer shall perform quality assurance quality control
(QA/QC) reviews of environmental documents and on supporting environmental
documentation to determine whether documents conform with:
1. Current Environmental Compliance Toolkit guidance, documentation requirements,
and templates published by TxDOT's Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) and in
effect as of the date of receipt of the documents or documentation to be reviewed;
2. Current state and federal laws, regulations, policies, guidance, agreements, and
memoranda of understanding between the City and other state or federal
agencies; and
3. Guidelines contained in Improving the Quality of Environmental Documents, A
Report of the Joint AASHTO/ACEC Committee in Cooperation with the Federal
Highway Administration (May 2006) for:
Page 7 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
a. Readability, and
b. Use of evidence and data in documents to support conclusions.
Upon request by the City, the Engineer shall provide documentation that the QA/QC
reviews were performed by qualified staff.
B. Deliverables must contain data acquired during the environmental service and be
written to be understood by the public in accordance with the TxDOT's Environmental
Toolkit guidance, documentation standards, and current guidelines, policies, and
procedures.
C. Electronic versions of each deliverable must be written in software that is fully
compatible with the software currently used by the City and provided in the native format
of the document for future use by the City. The Engineer shall supplement hard copy
deliverables with electronic copies in searchable Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format unless
another format is specified. Each deliverable must be a single, searchable .pdf file that
mirrors the layout and appearance of the physical deliverable. The Engineer shall
deliver the electronic files on USB flash drive in both the document's native format and
the PDF format.
D. When the environmental service is to apply for a permit (e.g., United States Coast
Guard (USCG) permit or USACE permit), the Engineer shall provide the permit and
supporting documentation to the City as the deliverable.
E. Submission of Deliverables
Deliverables must consist of documentation to support a categorical exclusion (CE)
determination, or the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as applicable. Technical reports and
documentation must be prepared to support the applicable environmental
classification (e.g. CE, EA, or EIS). Additionally, an Open -Ended (d) list
Categorical Exclusion Classification Request Form must be prepared to classify
the project as an Open Ended
(d) list CE, if needed.
2. Deliverables must comply with applicable state and federal environmental laws,
regulations, procedures, and TxDOT's Environmental Compliance Toolkits,
documentation requirements, and templates.
3. On the cover page of environmental documentation, the Engineer shall insert the
following language in a way that is conspicuous to the reader or include it in a CE
project record:
"The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable
Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried -out by
TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated
December 9, 2019, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT."
F. The City will provide the City's and other agency comments on draft deliverables to the
Engineer. The Engineer shall revise the deliverable:
1. To include State commitments, findings, agreements, or determinations (e.g.,
wetlands, endangered species consultation, Section 106, or Section 4(f)), required
for the transportation activity as specified by the City;
2. To incorporate the results of public involvement and agency coordination;
3. To reflect mitigation measures resulting from comments received or changes in the
transportation activity; and
Page 8of21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
4. To include with the revised document a comment response form (matrix) in the
format provided by the City.
G. The Engineer shall provide photographs and graphics that clearly depict details relevant
to an evaluation of the project area. Comparable quality electronic photograph
presentations must be at least 1200 x 1600 pixel resolution. The City can request
images/graphics be provided in another format or quality.
120.2. Environmental Re-evaluation Form.
A. The Engineer shall provide an environmental re-evaluation form.
B. Minimum Deliverables:
1. Draft environmental re-evaluation form
2. Final environmental re-evaluation form
120.3. Environmental Technical Analyses and Documentation.
A. Definition of technical analyses and documentation for environmental services.
In general, technical analyses and documentation for environmental services might
include a report, checklist, form, or analysis detailing resource -specific studies identified
during the process of gathering data to make an environmental decision.
The City may determine what technical reports and documentation are necessary for
the given project. The Engineer shall prepare technical reports and documentation for
the City with sufficient detail and clarity to support environmental determinations.
Technical reports must be compliant with TxDOT's Environmental Compliance Toolkits,
documentation requirements, and templates. The environmental document must
reference the technical reports.
Environmental technical reports and documentation must include appropriate NEPA or
federal regulatory language in addition to the purpose and methodology used in
delivering the service. Technical reports and forms must use templates and
documentation standards as applicable and include sufficient information to determine
the significance of impacts.
B. Minimum Deliverables:
1. Draft and Final technical analyses and documentation
2. Draft and final public involvement and stakeholder engagement materials to
include a public involvement and stakeholder communication plan; project
stakeholder list; up to three (3) news releases; up to three (3) email updates to the
stakeholder database; two (2) legal notices; up to ten (10) social media posts;
twelve (12) certified mail letters to affected property owners; one (1) factsheet and
two (2) updates; up to three (3) base PowerPoint presentations with tailored slides
for up to 30 meetings; handouts, sign -in sheets, exhibits, and meeting summaries
for up to 30 meetings; and documentation and responses for public comment
submissions
C. The exact environmental technical analyses and documentation must be determined at
the work authorization level, but can include:
Section 4(f) Evaluations
The Engineer shall provide Section 4(f) Evaluations. The Section 4(f) Evaluation
must conform to the appropriate TxDOT Section 4(f) checklist for de minimis
evaluations. Section 4(f) Evaluations must meet the requirements set forth in
TxDOT's Environmental Compliance Toolkits. The 4(f) Section of the
Page 9 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
environmental document states the reason a Section 4(f) evaluation is being
completed. The 4(f) Section of the environmental document discusses the
presence of Section 4(f) properties located in the project area.
It is assumed that de minimis documentation will be needed due to additional ROW
impacts at the Henna House property and Texas Baptist Childrens Home property,
both Section 4(f) properties.
2. Environmental Public Involvement (23 CFR §771.111)
The Engineer shall provide public involvement activities, which might include:
a. The Engineer shall draft a public involvement and stakeholder communication
plan
b. Update stakeholder list based on previous project files
c. Provide up to three (3) news releases
d. Provide up to three (3) email updates to the stakeholder database
e. Provide two (2) legal notices
f. Provide up to ten (10) social media posts
g. Send twelve (12) certified mail letters to affected property owners
h. Develop one (1) factsheet and one (1) update
Provide up to two (2) base PowerPoint presentations with tailored slides for 15
meetings
Assist the City in conducting 15 meetings (6 meetings for properties under the
Notice and Opportunity to Comment process, 4 meetings under the 4(f)
process, and 5 meetings with various agencies) with property owners,
stakeholders, the public, and various agencies to discuss and review the
project and the schematic design. Provide handouts, sign -in sheets, exhibits,
and meeting summaries for up to 15 meetings
Provide documentation and responses for public comment submissions.
The Engineer shall prepare a Notice and Opportunity to Comment as needed.
The Engineer shall prepare schematic exhibits, constraints maps, and other
necessary exhibits, and assist the City with presentations.
3. Community Impacts Analysis
The Engineer shall provide community impact analyses. Community impacts
includes environmental justice, limited English proficiency, and other issues as
addressed in TxDOT environmental guidance. The Engineer shall perform
community impact assessments including environmental justice analysis in
accordance with Attachment A, Article 38, Sections J and K of the contract.
Community impact analyses might include:
a. Community Impacts Assessment Technical Report Form. The assessment
may include:
(1) Identification of environmental justice communities within the study
area;
(2) A community profile;
(3) A displacement analysis;
Page 10 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
(4) An access and travel pattern analysis;
(5) A community cohesion analysis;
(6) Determination if the project would have disproportionately high and
adverse impacts on environmental justice communities. Impacts
identified in the Community Impact Assessment and other relevant
studies (i.e. noise analysis) must be considered to determine if the
impacts disproportionately affect environmental justice communities;
(7) Identification of possible mitigation measures to avoid or minimize
adverse impacts to the environmental justice population within the
project area;
(8) Summary of public involvement process including methods used to
accommodate persons with limited English proficiency; and
(9) Identification of possible mitigation measures including those to avoid
and minimize adverse impacts to the environmental justice population
within the project area.
4. Biological/Natural Resources Management Analysis and Documentation
The Engineer shall provide environmental documentation, conduct field surveys,
and provide analysis of biological natural resources for compliance with state and
federal regulations as described in the TxDOT Environmental Guide: Volume 2
Activity Instructions, http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/env/toolkit/060-06-
ui. df, and the associated forms, templates, and guidance found in the Natural
Resources Toolkit, https://www.txdot.gov/inside-
txdot/division/environmental/compliance-toolkits/natural- resources.html. The
applicable natural resource studies must be determined at the work authorization
level. In the case that field surveys are required, then the Engineer must contact
ENV-NRM for clearance prior to starting work. ENV-NRM will verify that approved
methods and appropriately permitted and experienced staff will be used. At the
request of the City, the Engineer shall provide the following biological/natural
resource analysis:
a. Species Analysis Form, including:
(1) Species Analysis Spreadsheet, which can include a habitat analysis
for the entire project area, field surveys for protected species, and
presence/absence surveys.
(2) Tier 1 Site Assessment, which can include early coordination or
administrative coordination with TPWD.
(3) Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) analysis and
coordination assistance.
b. For projects within a USFWS Designated Karst Zone or Critical Habitat:
(1) A USFWS permitted biologist must perform the habitat assessmentfor
listed karst invertebrates per USFWS protocols.
(2) A Texas licensed Professional Geoscientist (P.G.) must perform, sign,
and seal the karst features survey. The Texas licensed P.G. must
have experience in central Texas karst geology.
5. Initial Site Assessment (ISA) with Hazardous Materials Project Impact Evaluation
Report
Page 11 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
The Engineer shall provide an ISA with Hazardous Materials Project Impact
Evaluation Report for the limits of the proposed project in accordance with
Statement of Work for Hazardous Materials Processes related to NEPA in the
TxDOT Hazardous Materials Management Toolkit (http://www.txdot.aov/inside-
txdot/division/environmental/compliance-toolkits/haz-mat.html).
6. Archeological Documentation Services
The Engineer shall provide archeological studies and documentation.
Archeological studies must be sufficient to satisfy the current TxDOT Archeological
Sites and Cemeteries Toolkit. An archeological background study must be
performed prior to field work. If the Engineer was provided with a background study
by the City, a new background study is not required. The Engineer shall provide
archeological resource identification, evaluation, and documentation services. In
compliance with TxDOT's Environmental Compliance Toolkits, the Engineer shall
provide the following archeological services/deliverables:
a. Supplemental Archeological background study
7. Historic Resource Identification, Evaluation, and Documentation Services The
Engineer shall provide historic resource identification, evaluation, and
documentation services. In compliance with TxDOT's Environmental Compliance
Toolkits, the Engineer shall provide the following historic resource
services/deliverables:
a. Historic Resources PCR, and
b. Supplemental Historic Resource Survey Report, reconnaissance level
documentation.
Services, except the historic resource PCR, must have prior approval by TxDOT's
Environmental Affairs Division's Historical Studies Branch (ENV-HIST) to be
performed. The historic resource PCR must be accepted by ENV-HIST prior to
survey field work.
UTILITY ACTIVITIES
135.1. Utility Engineering Investigation.
The Engineer shall complete a targeted Quality Level B subsurface utility engineering (SUE)
investigation within the existing and proposed ROW along US 79 from IH 35 to AW Grimes
Boulevard to upgrade existing SUE data provided by others to increase the quality level of
previously mapped utilities or capture new utilities installed after the original SUE investigation
was completed. The areas of higher level SUE will be identified by the Engineer and the Utility
Coordinator and approved by the City. For estimating purposes this proposal includes a
maximum of one hundred fifty hours (150) of QLB field designating time. The QLB
investigation will be inclusive of Quality Level C and D SUE. The Engineer is estimated to
complete twenty (20) Quality Level A test holes, as needed, at potential utility conflict
locations. Quality Level A test holes will only be performed when approved or requested by
the City.
Utility engineering investigation includes utility investigations subsurface and above ground
prepared in accordance with ASCE/CI Standard 38-22
Page 12of21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
[(http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/asce.cfm)] and Utility Quality Levels.
A. Utility Quality Levels (QL)
Utility Quality Levels are defined in cumulative order (least to greatest) as follows:
1. Quality Level D - Quality level value assigned to a utility segment or utility feature
after a review and compilation of data sources such as existing records, oral
recollections, locations marked by DIGTESS, and data repositories.
2. Quality Level C - Quality level value assigned to a utility segment or utility feature
after surveying aboveground (i.e., visible) utility features and using professional
judgement to correlate the surveyed locations of these features with those from
existing utility records.
3. Quality Level B - Designate: Quality level value assigned to a utility segment or
subsurface utility feature whose existence and position is based upon appropriate
surface geophysical methods combined with professional judgment and whose
location is tied to the project survey datum. Horizontal accuracy of Designated
Utilities is 18" (including survey tolerances) unless otherwise indicated for a specific
segment of the deliverable. Quality Level B incorporates quality levels C and D
information. A composite plot is created.
4. Quality Level A — Quality level value assigned to a portion (x, y, and z geometry) of
a point of a subsurface utility feature that is directly exposed, measured, and whose
location and dimensions are tied to the project survey datum. Other measurable,
observable, and judged utility attributes are also recorded (per District Best
Practices). The utility location must be tied to the project survey datum with an
accuracy of 0.1 feet (30-mm) vertical and to 0.2 feet (60-mm) horizontal. As test
holes may be requested up front or during the project, test holes done prior to
completion of QL D, C, or B deliverables must be symbolized on the QL B
deliverable with a call out indicating test holes number. This is in addition to and not
in lieu of the test hole.
B. Utility Investigations Methodology
Utility Investigation Quality Level D The Engineer shall:
a. Perform records research from available resources. Sources include:
Texas811, Railroad Commission of Texas (Texas RRC), verbal recollection,
as- built information from plans, plats, permits and other applicable information
provided by the utility owners or other stakeholders.
b. Document utility owners and contact information.
c. Create a utility drawing of information gathered.
2. Utility Investigation Quality Level C The Engineer shall:
a. In combination with existing Quality Level D information, utilize surveyed
above- ground utility features and professional judgement to upgrade Quality
Level D information to Quality Level C. For those utilities unable to be
upgraded, retain as Quality Level D.
b. Overhead utilities information must be gathered and depicted. Sag elevations
of lowest utility must be documented at road crossings, per best practices
document.
c. Storm and sanitary sewer information must be gathered from Level D and
upgraded to Level C as possible, unless otherwise directed by the City.
Page 13 of 21
City of Round Rock Work Authorization No. 1
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
d. Mapping of underground vaults may be requested by the City.
e. Create composite utility drawing of information gathered.
3. Designate (Quality Level B)
Designate means to indicate the horizontal location of underground utilities by the
application and interpretation of appropriate non-destructive surface geophysical
techniques and reference to established survey control. Designating (Quality Level
B) services are inclusive of Quality Levels C and D.
The Engineer must:
a. As requested by the City, compile "as -built" information from plans, plats and
other location data as provided by the utility owners.
b. Coordinate with utility owner when utility owner's policy is to designate their own
facilities at no cost for preliminary survey purposes. The Engineer shall examine
utility owner's work to verify accuracy and completeness.
c. Designate, record, and mark the horizontal location of the existing utility
facilities using non-destructive surface geophysical techniques.
d. Using both active and passive scans to attempt to locate additional utilities,
including unrecorded and abandoned storm and sanitary sewer facilities, at the
direction of the City, may be investigated using additional methods such as
rodding that would then classify them as Quality Level B. A non -water based
pink paint or pink pin flags must be used on surface markings of underground
utilities.
e. Correlate utility owner records with designating data and resolve discrepancies
using professional judgment. The Engineer must prepare and deliver to State
a color -coded composite utility facility plan with utility owner names, quality
levels, line sizes and subsurface utility locate (test hole) locations. The
Engineer and State acknowledge that the line sizes of designated utility
facilities detailed onthe deliverable will be from the best available records and
that an actual line size is normally determined from a test hole vacuum
excavation. A note must be placed on the designate deliverable only that
states "lines sizes are from best available records". Above -ground utility
feature locations must be included in the deliverable to the City. This
information must be provided in the latest version of OpenRoads civil design
system used by the City. The Engineer shall deliver the electronic file on USB
flash drive, as requested by the City. A hard copy is required and must be
signed, sealed, and dated by the registered engineer overseeing the utility
engineering investigation. When requested by the City, the designated utility
information must be over laid on the City's design plans.
f. Determine and inform the City of the approximate electronic utility depths at
critical locations as determined by the City. The limits of this additional
information should be determined prior to the commencement of work. This
depth indication is understood by both the Engineer and the City to be
approximate only and is not intended to be used preparing the ROW and
construction plans.
g. Provide a monthly summary, with weekly updates, of work completed and in
process with adequate detail to verify compliance with agreed work schedule.
h. Close-out permits as required.
Page 14 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Clearly identify utilities that were discovered from Quality Levels C and D
investigation but cannot be depicted in Quality Level B standards. These
utilities must have a unique line style and symbology in the designate (Quality
Level B) deliverable.
j. Comply with applicable TxDOT policy and procedural manuals.
4. Subsurface Utility Locate (Test Hole) Service (Quality Level A)
Locate is the process used to obtain precise horizontal and vertical position,
material type, condition, size, and other data that may be obtainable about the utility
facility and its surrounding environment through exposure by non-destructive
excavation techniques that confirms the integrity of the utility facility. Subsurface
Utility Locate (Test Hole) Services (Quality Level A) are inclusive of Quality Levels
B, C, and D.
The Engineer must:
a. Review requested test hole locations and advise the City in the developmentof
an appropriate locate (test hole) work plan relative to the existing utility
infrastructure and proposed highway design elements.
b. Coordinate with utility owner inspectors as may be required by law or utility
owner policy.
C. Place Texas 811 ticket 48 hours prior to excavation.
d. Neatly cut and remove existing pavement material, such that the cut does not
exceed 0.10 square meters (1.076 square feet) unless unusual circumstances
exist.
e. Measure and record the following data on an appropriately formatted test hole
data sheet that has been sealed and dated by the Engineer:
(1) Elevation of top of utility tied to the datum of the furnished plan.
(2) Minimum of two benchmarks utilized. Elevations must be within an
accuracy of 15mm (.591 inches) of utilized benchmarks.
(3) Elevation of existing grade over utility at test hole location.
(4) Horizontal location referenced to project coordinate datum.
(5) Outside diameter of pipe or width of duct banks and configuration of
non- encased multi -conduit systems.
(6) Utility facility materials.
(7) Utility facility condition.
(8) Pavement thickness and type.
(9) Coating/wrapping information and condition.
(10) Unusual circumstances or field conditions.
f. Excavate test holes in such a manner as to prevent damage to wrappings,
coatings, cathodic protection, and other protective coverings and features.
Water excavation can only be utilized with written approval from the
appropriate TxDOT district office.
g. Be responsible for damage to the utility during the locating process. In the
event of damage, the Engineer must stop work, notify the appropriate utility
facility owner, the City, and appropriate regulatory agencies. The regulatory
Page 15 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
agencies include: the Railroad Commission of Texas and the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality. The Engineer shall not resume work
until the utility facility owner has determined the corrective action to be taken.
The Engineer is liable for costs involved in the repair or replacement of the
utility facility.
h. Back fill excavations with appropriate material, compact backfill by appropriate
mechanical means, and restore pavement and surface material. The Engineer
is responsible for the integrity of the backfill and surface restoration for a
period of three years.
i. Furnish and install a permanent above -ground marker (as specified by the
City, directly above center line of the utility facility.
j. Provide complete restoration of work site and landscape to equal or better
condition than before excavation. If a work site and landscape is not
appropriately restored, the Engineer shall return to correct the condition at no
extra charge to the City.
k. Plot utility location position information to scale and provide a comprehensive
utility plan signed and sealed by the responsible professional engineer. This
information must be provided in the latest version of MicroStation and be fully
compatible with the OpenRoads civil design system used by the City. The
electronic files will be delivered on USB flash drive as requested. When
requested by the City, the locate information must be over laid on the City's
design plans.
I. Return plans, profiles, and test hole data sheets to the City. If requested,
conduct a review of the findings with the City.
m. Close-out permits as required.
DELIVERABLES
The Engineer shall provide the following:
• PDF signed and sealed sets of 11 inch x 17 inch colored drawings depicting utility
information collected.
• PDF signed and sealed sets of 8.5"x11" Test Hole Data Sheets depicting utility information
collected.
• A Summary Sheet of Test Hole Data
• Electronic submittal containing electronic MicroStation (DGN) files compatible with the latest
version of ORD in US feet (2D) format.
• 3D ORD model of existing utilities utilizing ORD 10.12. Depths of utilities will be based on
electronic depths and Quality Level A SUE where available. If no electronic depth or QLA
SUE data is available, utility elevations will be based upon UAR depths.
• Record information in PDF format received from each utility.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
145.1. Project Management.
The Engineer shall:
A. Perform general Project Management during the course of the project to include
coordination with the City and TxDOT, preparing invoices, and management of
Page 16of21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
subconsultants
B. Preparation of project correspondence including reports, record keeping, and letters as
necessary.
C. Prepare and update as necessary the project design schedule
D. Prepare Project Management Plan and QA/QC Plan
E. Attend monthly project progress and coordination meetings with the City as required
during the project development
F. Attend project progress and coordination meetings with TxDOT as required during the
project development (up to 6 meetings)
G. Prepare monthly invoices and progress reports
H. Perform QA/QC of deliverables prior to submittal to the City and TxDOT. Implement a
documented QA/QC program in accordance with the Engineer's established procedures
DESIGN SURVEY
150.1. Design Survey.
A. Tasks to be Completed — Design Surveys
The Engineer's Surveyor shall provide topographic survey
- On US 79 from 500' west of IH-35 SBFR to 2,700' east of A.W. Grimes.
- On Mays St from 400' south of Sunset Dr to 400' north of Northwest Dr
- At Georgetown St intersection — 300' north of US 79 and 500' south of US 79
- At Sunrise St intersection — 600' north of US 79
- At AW Grimes intersection — 500' north of US 79 and 600' south of US 79
- At Onion Branch — 500' north of US 79 and 500' south of US 79
- At three major cross culvert locations — 300' north of US 79 and 300' south of US
79
Design Survey tasks include the following:
1. Collect data to create cross -sections and DTMs.
2. Locate existing utilities.
3. Locate existing improvements.
4. Provide details of existing bridge structures, including bridge limits, bents, columns,
retaining walls, beam types, and natural ground elevations at Onion Creek Branch.
5. Locate details of existing drainage features including culverts, manholes, retention
and detention ponds, flowlines, and associated features.
6. Review existing ROW maps and locate the existing ROW.
a. Review existing ROW maps
Page 17 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
The Surveyor shall review ROW maps prepared by others for completeness
using the current schematic and the checklist provided by the TxDOT district.
b. Locate existing ROW
The Surveyor shall resurvey the existing ROW where it is necessary to
update or redefine ROW lines. Standard surveying procedures must be
adhered to including record research, recovering existing monuments, and
replacing monuments as appropriate. The Surveyor shall prepare an abstract
map, preliminary map, final map, GIS graphics file, and a Surveyor's report.
The final map must also include a monument table showing the property
monuments that were found and set, and certified by the Surveyor. The
Surveyor shall prepare maps either in standard map sheets format or roll map
format as requested by the TxDOT district.
7. Locate boreholes.
8. Verify the condition and usefulness of existing control points including verification
of the values. Establish additional control as needed. Tie to other control points in
the project vicinity including points established by the National Geodetic Survey
(NGS), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and other local
entities as directed by the City.
9. Update existing control information and prepare new survey control data sheets, as
directed by the City to be included in the construction plan set as described below:
a. The Surveyor shall prepare, sign, seal, and date a survey control index sheet
and horizontal and vertical control sheet(s) to be inserted into the plan set.
b. The survey control index sheet provides an overview of the primary project
control and must include:
(1) An unscaled vicinity map showing the general location of the project in
relation to nearby towns or other significant cultural features.
(2) A scaled project map showing the extents of the project and the
location of the primary control points. The map must show street
networks, selected street names, control point identification, and
significant cultural features necessary to provide a general location of
the primary control.
(3) A table containing the primary control point values including the point
number, northing, easting, elevation, stationing, and stationing offset
values.
(4) Map annotation including a graphic scale bar, north arrow, and
standard TxDOT title block. The title block shall contain a section for
the district name, county, highway, and CSJ number. The title block
shall also contain a section for a Texas registered engineer to sign,
seal and date the sheet to include the following statement, "The
survey control information has been accepted and incorporated into
this PS&E." The required format of the survey control index sheet can
be downloaded from the TxDOT website.
(5) In the title block under the heading "Notes", identification of the
horizontal and vertical datum on which the primary control is based
with the date of the current adjustment, the surface adjustment factor
used, and unit of measure. The Surveyor shall include a note stating
that the coordinates are State Plane and a notation specifying either
Page 18 of 21
City of Round Rock Work Authorization No. 1
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
grid or surface adjusted coordinates.
c. The Surveyor shall prepare horizontal and vertical control sheets providing
detailed information about the construction, location, and monumentation of
the primary control, which must include:
(1) An unscaled location map for each primary control point showing the
location of the monument in relation to physical features located in the
vicinity. The location map must include a north arrow, the monument
designation, the monument northing, easting, and elevation.
(2) Directly below the location map a text description of the monument
including size, material, and construction followed by a description of
the location of the monument starting with the county and state
followed by a description suitable to locate the monument on the
ground.
(3) Map annotation including a graphic scale bar, north arrow, and a
standard TxDOT title block. The title block must contain a section for
the district name, county, highway, and CSJ number and contain a
section for a Texas registered engineer to sign, seal and date the
sheet to include the following statement, "The survey control
information has been accepted and incorporated into this PS&E." The
required format of the survey control index sheet can be downloaded
from the TxDOT website.
(4) In the title block under the heading "Notes", identification of the
horizontal and vertical datum on which the primary control is based
with the date of the current adjustment, the surface adjustment factor
used, and unit of measure. The Surveyor shall include a note stating
that the coordinates are either grid or surface adjusted coordinates.
150.2. Deliverables for Design.
The Surveyor shall provide the following:
A. Digital terrain models (DTM) and the triangular irregular network (TIN) files in a format
acceptable by the City.
B. Maps, plans, or sketches prepared by the Surveyor showing the results of field surveys.
C. Computer printouts or other tabulations summarizing the results of field surveys.
D. Digital files or media acceptable by the City containing field survey data (ASCII data
files).
E. Maps, plats, plans, sketches, or other documents acquired from utility companies,
private corporations, or other public agencies, the contents of which are relevant to the
survey.
F. Field survey notes, as electronic and hard copies.
G. A digital and hard copy of computer printouts of horizontal and vertical conventional
traverses, GPS analysis and results, and survey control data sheets.
H. OpenRoad files.
Page 19 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY
163.1. Utility Coordination.
A. Utility Base Map
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
The Engineer shall obtain information on existing utilities from utility owners and shall
conduct investigations to identify and evaluate known existing and proposed public and
private utilities. The Engineer shall identify potential conflicts and attempt to minimize
the potential adverse utility impacts in the preparation of the revised schematic design.
The Engineer shall prepare a base map depicting the utility locations. The Engineer
shall create and maintain a utility conflict matrix along with a utility conflict exhibit
through the duration of the contract identifying potential known conflicts. The format of
the matrix and exhibit must be consistent with the latest version of the TxDOT Austin
District Utility Conflict Matrix and Utility Conflict Exhibit or other examples provided by
the City.
B. Utility Coordination
The Engineer shall assist the City in conducting utility coordination meetings with utility
companies, as required, to facilitate utility conflict identification and resolution.
1. The Engineer shall establish contact with existing utilities within and adjacent to the
project limits. This process must also be extended to utilities that approach the
TxDOT or the City, regarding plans to install facilities within the project limits after
the project has been initiated.
2. The Engineer will issue TxDOT and Austin District notifications to utility companies
within the project limits (notice of utility coordination (NOUC) and Notice of
Proposed Construction (NOPC)), as applicable. Assumes one letter of each type
per utility company and 15 utility companies.
3. The Engineer will prepare and submit Utility ID Request Forms to the Austin
District for each utility company within the project limits. Assumes a total of 15
utility companies.
4. The Engineer will maintain and provide the Austin District Utility Status Report
(USR) for utility companies within the project limits.
5. The Engineer will develop a SUE Workplans and then coordinate with the SUE
provider on field activities and review SUE deliverables (assumes 2 SUE
workplans: one for QL-B and a second for QL-A; assumes 2 meetings with the
SUE provider).
6. The Engineer shall prepare an agenda, schedule and conduct, and document a
single utility kick-off meeting to invite all identified utility companies to convey
project information and to obtain information on existing and proposed facilities
within the project limits. Major utility facilities to be discussed and analyzed to avoid
relocation, if possible (assumes 15 utility companies).
7. The Engineer shall prepare agendas, and conduct meetings with utility companies
and incorporate the City's project team to confirm existing facilities, utility company
property interests, identified utility conflicts at a schematic level. Limited to 12 total
meetings in schematic design.
8. The Engineer will attend the City of Round Rock utility coordination meetings
(limited to 12 meeting for schematic design)
9. The Engineer shall establish and promote the desired agenda and methodologies
Page 20 of 21
City of Round Rock
US 79 from IH-35 to AW Grimes
Work Authorization No. 1
Prime Firm: HDR Engineering, Inc.
for utility construction within the project limits. This shall consist primarily of
promoting the construction of utilities as a part of the highway contract (i.e., joint
bid utility adjustments with highway contract), as applicable.
10. The Engineer shall schedule and conduct utility coordination meetings (utility
mapping verification meetings) with the City to coordinate the work effort and
resolve problems. The Engineer shall prepare a written report of these utility
coordination meetings. The meetings must include review of the following:
a. Existing and proposed facilities (utility layouts) including major facilities to be
avoided with the project, if possible, in pdf and 2D dgn formats.
b. Utility Conflict Matrix (UCM) (assumes at schematic level submittal) note any
identified property interests and long -lead items
c. Review of 3D ORD model of existing & proposed utilities utilizing ORD 10.12
from SUE provider.
C. Deliverables
1. Utility Conflict Matrix (UCM) along with Utility Conflict Exhibit in pdf format. The
Utility Conflict Exhibits will be roll plot for schematic design (pdf and 2D dgn
formats) and include callouts to indicate the conflict ID#s, utility owner, type of line
(water, sewer, high pressure gas, etc.), material (if it is an AC pipe line, etc.), and
size (if known).
2. Utility Contacts list in Excel and pdf format
3. Utility Summary to indicate major utility facilities or time sensitive items pertaining
to utilities that need to be addressed in PS&E.
Page 21 of 21
AMP
r
10
_ r�♦y, 1iK dal.• _- ♦:, ri t ' t•:1 %' 4�,rT �. Sn
i3♦i1 +err k i - t Y 4
vas)
•,'°r J-..LW'+,M►� o w' j `vkGi •+5 .Yti _.: _ t= , ! i
°: , � x - .:+�, ;;�� 1 ,,."� •'j•1-. � , �.- .- � a; yyam�,
-
O
goad a
"F�_ tit z-_: ,... `
SUNRISE e1RDQ�i♦.,C 1 .��'• �T I t �3
,' 1 •:. 4 r �/tea � ,t , � t ''�r•-a}t
Yo-
7. + ! •� t la. _. i
a' L `Q �I • V� :
G�WI'N 5T-I. 'Y •1 is .Y�" • �'1-
ipO�p E
Is N
PP L
D R �+. F2 :. III _ ' N'! ` - m ,♦ ..1 •, t w 31J�.� 0\'p' ,5 �P 5
•fi �• i O P.P QI. I Q nt , . W hClf
OE
' \ �'; ¢ �_+ _•�' ! I •Q� 'yr .Z, - {' r' , try ds
�ltii' e
rya.. S 3 V � ;1` y-�� - -��� 3 �' ' ^ ,W � a �N /. �. ,-r • r ,--•Qt"
• • nbyy .W F t i ia' - `}�` 1 �- •• y' ��• a 4.'.. J - tSN�P e:,RO S �Ji
sv r rtrt y, ••� N• ",
1y\ v0' •�.{ l.+ �r -ram •'�, •Z l "•�t't". 'F{jj�
•'SRO BB\I.NMt.'Pii S , r -\ Z� �' ''t P\pZ Ps^• • /+:
..�. r.:
• � �- `\ � NAM `y.S����. d �l
d
r"•� W �I �lY O 1
Y a: n'•' 3
1 � / f� t.MPyZ Zt .n•`. •..•ti./•t_i,tr_ "' N �.'.� 4. ,rw
orb a s s 1 F
r
p
Ni
� `I• GY , N IH 35 F •¢'� - `�� ���. , P.L RDI R� •♦
'�, � �- ± i! �•' fi , ti' ONISN OLM �?� ~� / -
` l �j
i 35 FWY •♦ �'\ V oil, •'11� ,o'�Slf4 `i ilst,� !'-;.�-`
� 11S•��t t � ,��\Need# � �- t 1, �� f �,