R-2025-144 - 6/12/2025 RESOLUTION NO. R-2025-144
WHEREAS, Section 395.058 of the Texas Local Government Code ("the Act") requires the
Capital Improvement Advisory Committee ("CIAC") to report to the City Council the progress of the
capital improvements plan and any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the
impact fee; and
WHEREAS, the CIAC is also required to advise the Council of the need to update the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plan and impact fees; and
WHEREAS,the CIAC has submitted a Roadway Impact Fee Semi-Annual Report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the attached Report and has determined same to be
in compliance with the Act, Now Therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS,
That the Roadway Impact Fee Semi-Annual Report submitted by the CIAC, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A," and incorporated herein, is hereby approved.
The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and
subject of the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted was posted and that such meeting was
open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Resolution and the subject matter
hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act,
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended.
RESOLVED this 12th day of June, 2025.
401
CRAIG gOkGAYAayor
City of Round Ro ,Texas
ATTE T:
ANN FRANKLIN, City Clerk
0112.20252:3924)-}798-7911
r'� I
7 V� � N ✓Y T'`���+,rl''s�' � .....v�....�.nr.wwrs..�w..��_, a �f --- Y'
EXHIBIT
�5e163dlA�i�"�`r'�•i��� 4 rS3fis-7i �:L �-� :._. '.'xo'�"i'-r �i�w�la _:
Blvd,Bridge Columns and Beam design for Wyoming Springs Extension from Creekbend Blvd to Old
Settlers
Roadway Impact Fee
Semi-Annual Report
May 2025
ROUND ROCK TEXAS
SUMMARY
The Texas Local Government Code Section 395.058 requires the Capital
Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC) to report to the political subdivision the
progress of the capital improvements plan and any perceived inequities in
implementing the plan or imposing the Roadway Impact Fee. Included herein is the
semi-annual report for the reporting period of October 1, 2025, to March 31, 2025,
which represents the first half of the City's annual Fiscal Year. The report consists
of assessing the implementation of the Roadway Impact Fee, Impact Fee collection
and the administrative review process now underway.
The Texas Local Government Code also requires the CIAC to advise the City on
updating the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan and Roadway
Impact Fees. The City of Round Rock Roadway Impact Fee Study was first adopted
by the City Council in March 2019, and the City of Round Rock Roadway Impact Fee
Study was formally updated in November 2023. The Roadway Impact Fee includes
phased adoption that include collection of fees beginning in January 2021 with
multiple phases of implementation. Phase 1 for all plats recorded prior to January
1, 2022, Phase 2 for plats recorded between January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023,
and Phase 3 for plats recorded between January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. A
new Phase 4 was added with implementation beginning on January 1, 2025.
Per Chapter 395.052, the land use assumptions and capital improvement plan are
required to be updated every five years. On November 2, 2023, the City Council
adopted the City of Round Rock 2023 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update (2023
Update) satisfying the required update. In this update Service Area B was split into
two Service Areas B and D. The 2023 Update also included updating the trip
generation data to the latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th
edition, which made minor changes to the calculation of fees based on trip
generation and trip length per land use category and added additional land use
categories to the calculation. The largest change was splitting the base fee for
Service Area A into its own category starting in 2025.
2
Introduction
The Roadway Impact Fee was first adopted in March 2019,with the required update to the capital
improvement plan and use land assumptions adopted in November 2023, with the purpose of
providing a more reliable funding source for planned transportation capital projects. In
November 2023, minor study updates were approved by City Council which only modified the
map and clarified the limits of certain projects, but did not affect the capital improvement plan
or land use assumptions.
The largest change surrounding the implementation of the Roadway Impact Study was the
creation of the Public Works Department in August 2024, which merged the Utilities and
Environmental Department and Transportation Department. This has worked to strengthen the
collaboration between departments in the provision of our essential municipal services. The
capital improvement program for the Roadway Impact Study is now administered under the
Public Works—Transportation Division.
Roadway Impact Fee Adoption
For Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3, final adoption of the Roadway Impact Fee occurred on March
14, 2019. The Roadway Impact Fee was adopted with a maximum fee per service unit of$2,511,
which represents the lowest calculated rate across three service areas. With the base service
unit, the adoption also limited collection of fees to a percentage of the adopted unit cost over
three phases of implementation.
Phase 4 of the Roadway Impact Fee splits the maximum fee per service unit between Service
Area A with a maximum fee of$5,740 and Service Areas B,C and D with a maximum fee of$3,818.
Table 1 shows the phasing and percentage of fees collected over the implementation period.
Table 1: Impact Fee Implementation Phasing
Phase Residential Rate Non- Residential Implementation Period
(%of Service Rate(%of (based on date of Final Plat recordation)
Unit) Service Unit
Grace Period No Fee No Fee Building permit before January 1, 2021
Phase 1 30% 20% Final Plat before January 1, 2022
Phase 2 45% 25% Final Plat before January 1, 2024
Phase 3 60% 30% Final Plat on or after January 1,2025
Phase 4 new max fee 60% 1 30% Final Plat on or after January 1, 2025
The Roadway Impact Fee is assessed at the recorded plat and collected at the time of building
permit issuance.
Roadway Impact Fee Collection
Roadways Impact Fees are collected, and revenue deposited into accounts for each of the service
areas identified in the Roadway Impact Fee Study.The Revenue collected to date is presented in
Table 2. Those services areas are identified in Figure 1.
3
Table 2: RIF Collections April 1,2024,to September 30,2024
Service Area Previous Revenue Total Revenue
October '24 to March 25
Service Area A $2,586,096.56 $220,090.24 $2,806,186.80
Service Area B $6,905,097.86 ($79,574.49) $6,825,523.37
Service Area C $3,142,502.31 $777,366.05 $3,919,868.36
Service Area D $594,564.60 $829,736.06 $1,424,300.66
Colletions to Date $13,228,261.33 $1,747,617.86 $14,975,879.19
* Collections in Service Area D began in January 2024.
Service Area B, generally east of IH 35, north of E. Palm Valley (US 79) and west of Kenney Fort
Boulevard, had actual revenue of $593,116.61, but was offset by reimbursement of Roadway
Impact Fees paid to a developer in the amount of$672,691.10. The reimbursement was for fees
paid while the developer completed construction of a portion of College Park Drive from Old
Settlers running north by the Urban Moment at Medow Lake (Urbana).
In most cases Roadway Impact Fees are Offset credits given prior to building permits being issued
for development, however, in this case roadway was not completed and accepted by the City
when the building permits were issued. The Offset agreement with Urbana was signed in March
2025 after final acceptance of the roadway improvements by the City. The developer then
assigned the credits to previously paid roadway impact fees associated with the building permits
resulting in a reimbursement of$672,691.10 of fees collected in previous years.
This reporting period included over 100 non-residential building permits and temporary
construction permits that were for re-models of existing facilities, tenant finish buildouts, or
change in tenants that did not include additional square footage. These changes did not trigger
a change in the ITE Land Use Code, resulting in no Roadway Impact Fee collection with the
building permit.
On January 1, 2024, Phase 3 of fee implementation went into effect. Any Final Plat recorded after
this date will be subject to an increase in the percentage of Service Unit calculated for the
Roadway Impact fee. Residential rates will increase from 45%to 60% and Non-Residential rates
will increase from 25% to 30% of maximum fee per service unit of $2,511. Phase 4 with the
increase maximum per service unit and split of Service A and Services Areas B, C and D rate
structure will go into effect on January 1, 2025.
4
Figure I:RIF Service Areas
1
IJO
�1snn
1„s1 0
1 �
1\ 1 CR 161
L� 1 NYRn&eA1q 0
c�1p1 • � z
\i E��N�p1FJ ,s VA
el Rd Q o oW`j0`�
W96 —_
'35
� 1
N � A
/
GR iMGate School R4 �-
I.epw,d Service Areas
�• �••^ted+•• �` `3 Implementation Phase a
—� � •-�i __ and Future Phases
t = ' RdlleI ROIX TE)(AS
\\� 0 1 Z R' E
O S
August 2023
Roadway Impact Fee Distribution
Distribution of the RIF collected to Capital Improvement Plan projects began in the Fourth
Quarter of 2021, the first quarter of the FY2022 budget year. Table 3 illustrates the distribution
and available balance for Roadway Impact Fee revenue.
Table 3: RIF Revenue Distribution and Available Balance
Transferred for Road CO Debt Service Payments
Service Area A: $316,131.00
Service Area B: $4,373,444.00
Service Area C: $1,810,425.00
Service Area D: new in 2024
Total: $6,500,000.00
Available Balance
Service Area A: $2,710493.76
Service Area B: $2,799,780.89
Service Area C: $2,270,781.35
Service Area D: $1,424,300.66
Total: $6,728,261.33
5
In FY2024, $2.5 million in Roadway Impact Fee Revenue was used in CO Debt Service Payments,
bringing total revenue expenditure to$6.5 million to date.There are currently no plans to expend
revenue in FY 2025. Prior distributions have been allocated to projects in Service Area B, that
were moved to the new Service Area D with the split in 2023 Update, no new projects have been
initiated in Service Area D.
Appendix A includes the Service Area Boundaries and specific projects eligible for funding with
Roadway Impact Fee revenue.
Project which received the transfer for road certificate of obligation debt for service payments are:
• Service Area A
• Wyoming Springs Road (New Construction) (A-26) design
• Deep Wood Drive (New Construction) (A-29) ROW preservation
• Chisholm Trail Widening North (A-16- & A-17) design and ROW
• Eagles Nest (A-15, B-11 & B-12) design
• Service Area B (will be split into new Service Area D as funding occurs)
• University Boulevard (Widening) (B-4) construction
• University Boulevard (Widening) (B-8 & D-2) construction
• CR 112 Widening (B-25 & B-26) design & ROW
• Kenney Fort Boulevard 4 (New Construction) (B-41) construction
• Eagles Nest (A-15, B-11 & B-12) design
• Kenney Fort Boulevard 5 & 6 (B-27, B-28, D-7 & D-8) design
• US 79 (Palm Valley) (B-46 & C-6) design
• Service Area C
• Gattis School Segment 3 (Widening) (C-21) design and ROW
• Gattis School Segment 6 (Widening) (C-21) design and ROW
• Kenney Fort Boulevard Segments 2 & 3 (New Construction) (C-10) construction
• Red Bud South (Widening) (C-11 to C-19) design and ROW
• McNeil (C-7) construction
• Gattis School Road Segments 4 & 5 (C-21) design
• Greenlawn Boulevard (C-24) design
• US 79 (Palm Valley) (B-46 & C-6) design
• Service Area D
• University Boulevard (Widening) (B-8 & D-2) construction
• CR 112 Widening (Averyn Nelson Parkway) (D-4) design & ROW
• Kenney Fort Boulevard 5 & 6 (B-27, B-28, D-7 & D-8) design
• Old Settlers Extension (New Construction) (D-25) design & ROW
• Red Bud North (Widening) (D-17, D-18, D-19 & D-20) design & ROW
6
Impact Fee Offsets and Service Area Matters
The intent of the Roadway Impact Fee process is to capture revenue for a predictable
implementation of the future arterial network identified in the Transportation Master Plan. Part
of the success of that implementation is in the fact contributions by the development community
are captured in Offset Agreements and Consent/Development Agreements. A Offset Agreement
with Urban Moment Development for construction of a portion of College Park Drive (Project B-
22 in the Roadway Impact Fee Study) was approved in March 2025 in the amount of$2,757,260.
The Developer used $672,691.10 in reimbursement from this agreement for Roadway Impact
Fees paid while the roadway project was under construction.
As in other reporting periods, an Impact Fee Study update that has no impacts to the Land Use
Assumptions or Methodology for Roadway Impact Fee Calculation, may be adopted on an as
needed basis outside of the overall study update required at a minimum of every five years from
the date of initial adoption or update. There are no changes proposed during this reporting
period.
In the November 2025 Update changes will need to be made to account for significant
annexations in Service Area B that are under review by the City Council at this time. This may
affect more than mapping, specifically adding projects that are currently not included in the
Methodology for Roadway Impact Fee Calculation. Staff will continue to monitor and update the
CIAC and City Council as development approvals for the Briggs Tract Annexation, Zoning and
Future Land Use Amendments going to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in
May 2025 occur.
Conclusion and Recommendation
No significant issues have been identified with Roadway Impact Fee implementation.The Building
Inspection, Finance and Public Works-Transportation Division provided excellent coordination in
operating the program. The required five-year review of the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance is
required by State Law to be completed by November 2028 but may be completed sooner based
on significant changes and growth in the community. While updates to the Fee Study could occur
at any time, staff will continue to attempt to coordinate those with the Semi-Annual Reporting
process when annexations into the City Limits occur.
7
1P
ROUND ROCK TEXAS
Table 2.A. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan—Service Area A
%In
Service Proj.4 IFClass Roadway Limits Length Service
Area (mr) Area
A-1 4 Lane-Enhanced(1/2) _ _ _ _ New Hope Rd(1) Sam Bass Rd to CR 175 1.10 100%
A-2 4 Lane-Enhanced l/2 New Hope Rd 2 240'W of Lagoona Dr to Fbwstone Ln 0.55 50%
A-3 4 Lane-Proposed New Hope Rd 3 Flowstone Ln to 1000'E of Wyoming Springs Or 0.46 50"/o
6 Lane-Enhanced Westinghouse Rd tH 35 SBFR to IH 35 NBFR 0.19 50%
A-7 6 Lane-Enhanced RM 1431 1 1 100'W of Ma field Ranch Blvd to 850'E of Stone Oak Or 0.97 50%
A-B 6 Lane-Enhanced RM 1431 2 850'E of Stone Oak Dr to 5195'E of Stone Oak St 0.82 100%
A-9 6 Lane-Enhanced RM 1431 3 5195'E of Stone Oak St to 11135 SBFR 1.34 50%
A-10 4 Lane-Enhanced 12 Wyoming Springs Dr 3 390'N of Goldenoak Cir to Alondra Way 0.13 100%
A-11 4 Lane-Proposed Ea es Nest Dr 1 Wyoming Springs Or to Chisholm Trl Rd Future 1.73 100%
A-12 4 Lane-Enhanced 1/2 Creek Bend Blvd 1 RM 1431 to West End PI 0.79 100%
A-13 4 Lane-Proposed Creek Bend Blvd 2 West End PI to Camino Del Verdes PI 0.14 100%
A-14 4 Lane-Proposed Chisholm Trl Rd 1) RM 1431 to CR 173 0.76 100%
A-15,B-11 4 Lane-Proposed Eagles Nest Dr 2) Chisholm Tri Rd Future to IH 35 NBFR 0.17 100%
A-16 5 Lane-Enhanced CR 173 IH 35 SBFR to 3250 N of Wolle Ln 0.10 1001/6
A-17 5 Lane-Enhanced Chisholm Tri Rd 2) 3250'N of Wolle Ln to 1980'N of Wolle Ln 0.24 1001/6
Q A-21 3 Lane-Enhanced Sam Bass Rd(3) FM 3406 to Desert Willow Dr 0.35 501/6
A-22 3 Lane-Enhanced Sam Bass Rd(4) Desert Willow Dr to Creek Bend Blvd 0.19 100%
A-23 3 Lane-Enhanced Sam Bass Rd 5 Creek Bend Blvd to Hairy Man Dr 0.21 100%
A-24 3 Lane-Enhanced Sam Bass Rd 6) Hairy Man Rd to Chisholm Tri Rd 1.33 501/o
A-26 4 Lane-Proposed Wyoming Sp—ys Or(4) Sam Bass Rd to Creek Bend Blvd 0.88 1 100%
A-28 4 Lane-Enhanced Creek Bend Blvd(3) Brushy Creek to W omn S rim s Dr 0.40 1001/6
--A-39— 4 Lane-Proposed Deep_wood Or(1)_ Sam Bass Rd to 345'N of RM 620 0.34 1001/6
A-30 4 Lane-Enhanced Dee wood Or 2) 345'N of RM 620 to RM 620 0.07 1001/6
A-31 C-1 6 Lane-Enhanced RM 620 Dee wood Dr to IH 35 SBFR 0.93 50%
%In
c e Location Impmvement(s) Service
_ E _ _—_-- Area
Sam Bass Rd and FM 3406 SIGNAL 100%
.-.________�—____ ____
Sam Bass Rd and Hairy Man Rd INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT 75%
Sam_Bass Rd_and_Chisholm °/
Trl Rd TURN LANES 100
Update ITS and Traffic Mana enet Infrastructure 25%
Note:The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2023 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update FINAL August 17,2023
City of Round Rock,Texas
i
a '
1
CD
\ 1
o.
\ t
FM1 \\ .�^�5\0� r CR173
o \ `��\e U
�. Ne
'Eagles
4
O m
Sam Bass d �m Odd
Y
v
U
\ S
Na\N
Service Area A
Legend o�
■ Interecti
eons Roadway Impact Fee CIP 2023 Impact Fee Study
Flood Zone __ New q 1N
—streets —Wid-ig 5 20 ROUND ROCK TEXAS E
dNO FM e a
�--+ Railroads Access Managemelt W
CD
P—iDmb Conso--W �\ 0 1 S 2
Other Thoroughfares \ 'a Miles
ExLs[hg Torou
hghfares
1 June 2023 Kimley>»Horn
Nopmd Tt,�h
ROUND ROCK TEXAS
Table 2.13. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan-Service Area B
In
Arae Praj.# IF Class Roadway Limits Lfjb Service
Area
Area
A-4,B-1 6 Lane-Enhanced Westin ouse Rd(I) _ IH 35 SBFR to IH 35 NBFR 0.19 50%
B-4 _6 Lane-Enhanced University Blvd 1) Unwersay Oaks Blvd to 335'W of Sunrise Dr 0.49 100%
B-5 6 Lane-Enhanced Univers Blvd 2 335'W of Sunrise Dr to A.W.Crimes Blvd 2.03 50%
B-6 4 Lane-Enhanced Univers Blvd(3) A.W.Cremes Blvd to 183V E of AV.Crimes Blvd 0.36 100%
B-7 _ 4 Lane-Enhanced Univers Blvd 4) 1830'E of A.W.Cranes Blvd to Lunata Way 0.78 50%
B-8 4 Lane-Enhanced University Blvd(5) Ltmata Way to Kenney Fort Blvd Fume 0.16 1000/,
B-9 4 Lane-Enhanced N Mas St 2) 350'S of U-rsity Blvd to 2000'S of University Blvd 0.31 100%
A-15,B-11 4 Lane-Proposed Ea es Nest 1 Chisholm Tri Rd(Future)to 11135 NBFR 0.08 50%
B-12 4 Lane-Pr ed Eagles Nest 2) IH 35 NBFR to Cypress Blvd 0.69 100%
B-13 4 Lane-Enhanced N Mays St(4) Paloma Or to 540'N of Steam Way 0.27 100%
B-15 4 Lane-Enhanced(A Sunrise Rd 2 Hidden Valley Or to 325'S of Eagles Nest St 0.54 100%
B-16 4 Lane-Enhanced(AM) Sunrise Rd(3) 325'S of Eagles Nest St to Applegate Ca 0.30 500/6
B-17 4 Lane-Enhanced(AM) Sunrise Rd 4 Applegate Ca to Lake Dr 0.20 100%
B-18 4 Lane-Enhanced(AM) Sunrise Rd 5) Lake Dr to 545'S of Lake Dr 0.10 50%
B-19 4 Lane-Enhanced Sunrse Rd 6 545'S of Lake Dr to Old Settlers Blvd 0.40 100%
B-21 4 Lane-Proposed Wallin Bradley 2 College Park Future to A.W.Crimes Blvd 0.37 100%
B-22 4 Lane-Proposed College Park 2 Avery Nelson Rd to 1355'N ofOld Settlers Blvd 0.91 100%
B-23 3 Lane-Existing Seton Pkwy 2400 N of Avery Nelson Blvd to Avery Nelson Blvd 0.45 100
B-24 4 Lane-Pr ed Medical Center Pkwy College Park to Seton Pkwy 0.27 100%
B-25 4 Lane-Enhanced Avery Nelson Pk I A.W.Ganes Blvd to 3580'E of A.W.Gimes Blvd 0.68 100%
B-26 4 Lane-Enhanced Avery Nelson Pk 2 358V E of A.W.Gimes Blvd to Kenna Fort Blvd(Future) 0.57 50%
to B-27,D-7 6 Lane-Proposed Ke-ey Fort Blvd 1 CR 117 to 145'N of Haselwood Ln 0.58 100%
B-28,D-9 4 Lane-Enhanced CR 117(l) CR 112 to San Felipe St 0.00 50%
B-31 6 Lane-Enhanced Old Settlers Blvd 2 Sunrise Rd to A.W.Gimes Blvd 1.13 100%
B-32 6 Lane-Enhanced 1/3 Old Settlers Blvd 3 A.W.Ganes Blvd to Kenney Fort Blvd Future 0.00 100%
B-34 4 Lane-Enhanced A Sunnse Rd Oki Settlers Blvd to Country Aire Dr 0.28 100%
B-35 6 Lane-Enhanced FM 1460 A.W.Crimes Blvd 1 Old Settlers Blvd to 375'S of Chandler Creek Blvd 0.35 100%
B-36 6 Lane-Enhanced FM 1460 A.W.Crimes BW 2 375'S of Chandler Creek Blvd to 1250'N of Tiger Trl 0.20 50%
B-37 6 Lane-Enhanced FM 1460 A.W.Gimes Blvd) 3 1250'N of Tiger Tr]to US 79 1.25 100%
B-38 6 Lane-Proposed 1/2 Kenna Fort Blvd 4 Old Settler's Blvd to 2540'S of Old Settler's Blvd 0.30 100%
B-39,D-10 6 Lane-Proposed Kenna Fort Blvd 5 Old Settler's Blvd to 2540'S of Old Settler's Blvd 0.18 50%
B-40,D-11 6 Lane-Proposed Kenne Fort Blvd 6 2540'S of Old Settlers Blvd to Chandler Creek Blvd 0.36 100%
B-41,D-12 6 Lane-Enhanced Kenna Fort Blvd Chandler Creek Blvd to Joe DiMa Blvd 0.30 100%
B42,D-14 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 4 Old Settlers Blvd to 170'N of Joseph St 0.00 100%
B-46,C-6 6 Lane-Enhanced US 79 3 2W E of Red Bud Ln to 1690'E of Red Bud Ln 0.28 50%
B-47 3 Lane-Proposed Joe Dima b Blvd Extension Kenney Fort Blvd to US 79 039 1001/6
B-48 3 Lane-Proposed Wallin Bradley 1) College Park Or to Awry Nelson Blvd 0.81 100%
B49 4 Lane-Pr ed Wallin_Bradley 3 A.W.Ganes Blvd to Kenney Fort Blvd(Future) 1.01 100%
B-50 6 Lane-Enhanced US 79(2) AW Gimes to Red Bud Ln 2.63 50%
B-51,C-28 4 Lane-Exi nng Terra Vista Pky Centerbrook PI to 350'S of Aosta Ln 0.00 5010
E %In
.e: E Location Improvement(s) Service
d
h > y
.... Area
BI 4 CI-8 :: `a A W Dunes Blvd and Pahn Valley Blvd OTHER&TURN LANES SO°o
Update ITS and Traffic Mana menet Infrastructure - 25°°
Note:The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2023 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update FINAL August 17,2023
City of Round Rock,Texas
\ 1
\ \ 1
rouse 1 \
�esi�a9 1 \
v v v
/ \ \ \\
\ to 65 �e�vd %0
\ i � Te�a�f ' ri�vecs`H
\ Z �p
, o�y SPK
' \\ — 1
9 very 1
\\ \\\ 1 ivy T-
\ V"
%
\\ dao /
v v 1 Wallin Bradley/
\
cue<l\els V` o
`
a o
Legend Bo�ma�R C m Joe Dimaggio Blvd N�^ fl• Service Area B
■ Intersections Roadway_Impact_Fee_CIP ,� - ? ° " N -�• o , 2023 Impact Fee Study
�
Flood Zone — —•New � �� V
—streets —Widening w N� ROUND ROCK TEXAS W E
—��Railroads Acus ManagementCD
7
Other Thoroughfares —Previocensmctea c 2
usly
Existing Thoroughfares * _ ' Miles
Proposed Thor-nhfares June 2023 KimleyoHorn
a
ROUND ROCK TEXAS
Table 2.C. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan—Service Area C
Length
In
rae Pro}# IF Class Roadway Limits (mi) Service
Are
Area
A-31,C-I 61,ane-Enhanced RM 620 Deepwood Dr to IH 35 SBFR 0.93 501/o
C-3 4 Lane-Enhanced CR 172 2) Hesters Crossing Rd to 445'N of Hesters Crossing Rd 0.08 50%
C-4 _ 4 Lane-Enhanced(AM) Hesters Crossing Rd Dry Creek Dr to IH 35 SBFR 032 100o/I
C-5 4 Lane-Enhanced Bratton Ln IH 35 SBFR to 1160'S of Michael Angelo Way 0.42 50%
B-46,C-6 6 Lane-Enhanced US 79 1 IH 35 NBFR to 200'E of Red Bud Ln 1.96 500/
C-7 3 Lane-Extstang McNeil Extension S Mas St to Georgetown St 0.52 100%
C-8 4 Lane-Enhanced(AM) S Mas St Nash St to Gattis School Rd 0.69 100%
C-10 6 Lane-Pro ed Kenney Fort Blvd 2 Forest Creek Dr to 830'S of Gattis School Rd 1.04 1001/6
C-11 4 Lane-Enhanced(AW Red Bud Ln 1 Forest Ridge Blvd to 265'S of Forest Ridge Blvd 0.05 50%
C-12 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 2 265'S of Forest Rala Blvd to 280'S of Woodlawn Ln 0.11 100
C-13 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 3 280'S of Woodlawn Ln to 130'S of Old Oaks Dr 0.10 50%
C-14 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 4 130'S of Old Oaks Or to 315'S of Country Dr 0.11 1000/
C-15 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 5 315'S of Country Dr to Wildflower Trl 0.10 50%
C-16 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 6 Wildflower Trl to 295'S of Wildflower Trl 0.06 1000/6
C-17 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 295'S of Wildflower Trl to 840'N of Forest Creek Dr 0.55 501/6
C-18 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 8 840'N of Forest Creek Or to 340'S of Forest Creek Or 0.22 loo"/0
V C-19 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 9 340'S of Forest Creek Dr to Gattis School Rd 0.71 501/.
U1 C-20 6 Lane-Enhanced Gattis School Rd 1 S Mas St to Windy Park Dr 1.23 100
C-21 6 Lane-Enhanced Gattis School Rd 2 Windy Park Or to Red Bud Ln 2.82 100%
C-22 4 Lane-Enhanced A S Mas St/Dell Way Gattis School Rd to Greenlawn Blvd 1.24 100%
C-23 6 Lane-Proposed Kenney Fort Blvd 3 830'S of Cmtts School Rd to SH 45 0.41 100%
C-24 6 Lane-Enhanced 1/3 Greenlawn Blvd IH 35 NBFR to SH 45 EBFR 1.86 100%
C-26 4 Lane-Enhanced Schultz 1 SH 45 EBFR to 290'S of SH 45 EBFR 1.45 100%
C-27 4 Lane-Enhanced_ Schultz 2 290'S of SH 45 EBFR to 255'S of Autumn Sage Wa 0.50 50%
B-51 C-28 6 Lane-Enhanced US 79 2 AW Grimes to Red Bud Ln 2.63 50%
In
E Location Improvement(s) Service
----....
'e
Area
CI-5 E ________Mads.St and LbertY Ave___ SIGNAL ,-..,100%
CI 7. Greenlawn Blvd and Lours Henna Blvd iSH 45 FR) OTHER ....1001/6_
BI-4,CI-8 •c° A.W.Grimes Blvd and Palm Valley Blvd OTHER&TURN LANES 50%
CI-10 Red Bud Ln and Gains School Rd TURN LANES 100%
y
CI-11 m E McNeil Rd and Oakridge Dr _ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT l00%
U date ITS and Traffic Mara enet Infrastructure _ 25%
Note:The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2023 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update FINAL August 17,2023
City of Round Rock,Texas
-mil
• � ► �,�" III �.y ���. _::--_, � �� � u� �1
�� 1``�t���;= '� �� �`t �� ICU L�, � � -. 1' ,51 --�+���-- -� �► �.
QIP-
'�' \�/.1vy 1 .:air- -'r / '��► i� Y v �n� � ��
'�►w_ MW
x\11
001,10
11� MF
���_,�►� '�'�,' = 1Service Area C
c�
2023 Impact
ions Roadway Impact Fee CIP N
Flood Zone - - - New \U ,� �
ROUND ROCK TEXAS W E
Streets - Widening
Other Thoroughfares _ ` Milest
Existing Thoroughfares - Mer Thoroughfares June 2023 KimlepMorn
`h`h
ROUND ROCK TEXA5
Table 2.D. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan-Service Area D
In
Ae& Pmj.# IF Class Roadway Limit iceL(rm)h Service
Area
D-1 4 Lane-Pfoposed CR 107 CR 107 to University Blvd 0.34 50%
D-2 4 Lare-Enhanced Univers Blvd 6 Kermey Fort Blvd to SH 130 244 100%
D-3 4 Lare-proposed CR 118 Umversity Blvd to Avery Nelson Pkwy 1.14 100%
D-4 4 Lane-Enhanced Avery Nelson 3 Kenney Fort Blvd to CR 110 1.11 100%
D-5 4 Lare-Existing Avery Nelson 4 CR 110 to 5015'E of CR 110 0.95 100%
D-6 4 Lane-proposed CR 118 Carmel Creekside Dr to Ed Schmidt Blvd 1.08 100%
&27 D-7 6 1"-proposed Kenney Fort Blvd I CR 117 to 125'N of Haselwood La 0.58 100%
D-8 4 Lane-proposed Kenney Fort Blvd 6 125'N of Haselwood In to 200'N of Bluffstone Dr 0.12 501.
B-28 D-9 6 Lane- ed _ K-emmiqFort Blvd 200'N of Blutfstone Dr to Old Settlers Blvd 0.36 100%
&39 D-10 6 Lane-Proposed KenneyFort Blvd 2 Old Settlers Blvd to 2540'S of Old Settler's Blvd 0.30 1001.
B40,D-I 1 6 Lane-Proposed(1/2) Kenney Fort Blvd(3) 2540'S of Old Settlees Blvd d 4625'N of Chandler Creek 0.18 501.
B-41,D-12 6 Ione-Proposed Kenney Fort Blvd(4) 4625'N of Chandler Creek Blvda 3115'N of Chandler Creek 0.36 100%
B-41 D-13 6 Lane-Proposed Kenwy Fort Blvd 8 31 15'N of Chandler Creek Blvd to Chandler Creek Blvd 0.59 1001.
< B42 D-14 6 Lare-Proposed Kenney Fort Blvd 5 Chandler Creek Blvd to Joe DihbjWo Blvd 0.30 100%
r" D-15 4 lane-Proposed Red Bud Ln 1 Guadala ata St to 160'N of'Margarita Loop 0.35 1001.
D-16 4 fare-E.Mmed 12 Red Bud La 2 160'N of Margarita Loop to CR It 7 0.35 50%
D-17 4 Lane-Enhanced I2 Red Bud La 3 CR 117 to Old Sealers Blvd 0.34 100%
D-18 4 Lane-Enhanced Red Bud In 4 Old Settlers Blvd to 170'N of Joseph St 0.45 1001/6
D-19 4 lane-Enhanced Red Bud Ln 5 170'N ofJoseph St to 160'S of Covered Wagon Td 0.18 50%
D-20 4 Lare-Enhanced Red Bud In 6 160'S of Covered Wagon Td to US 79 0.41 1001/6
D-21 4 Lane-Enhanced CR 122 I Red Bud Ln to 230'SW of Rosalim Loop 0.49 100%
D-22 _ 3 Lare-proposed CR 122 2 230'SW of Rosalita Loop to 100'S of Ermlia In 0.09 501.
D-23 3 Lane-Proed CR 122 3 IW S of Emilia In to 100'S of Rosalim Loop 0.04 10M
D-24 3 Lane-Proed CR 122 4 100'S of Rosalina Loop to 100'S of'Penelopc Ct 0.13 5011.
D-25 4 Lare-proposed Old Settlers Blvd Red Bud Ln to CR 110 0.77 100%
In
Intersection Improvement Location Improvement(s) Service
Area
ate ITS and Tragic Managmenct InfrasWctute 25%
Note:The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2023 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update FINAL August 17,2023
City of Round Rock,Texas
1 �
1 �
� � �• Peery s
00
f1
t°
0 % N o
61 % els � N
a �ery� o .0
p m G
vN
Ne�sor PK �
Peery ,,�1 CR 164
%% v�g ° D o Limmer Loop
� 1
e
/ o U
1
�• _
Old Settlers Blvd v
i
•• °a Old Settlers Blvd
a
CDCD
g C
1.
U
TI C
RI g°; a Service Area D
a 2023 Impact Fee Study
Legend ° S79 N
Hood zone Roadway Impact Fee CIP ••° ROUND ROCK TEXAS WE
Streets _ _ New _T
Railroads -widening Q--� 0 1 S 2
Other Thoroughfares Access Management1ma99io givd n Miles
Existing Thoroughfares Previously Constructed Joe D
• Proposed Thoroughfares 1 August 2023 Kimley o Horn
1