The URL can be used to link to this page

R-79-211 - 5/24/1979COMMISSION REAGAN HOUSTON CHAIRMAN DEWITT C GREER CHARLES E SIMONS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENGINEER - DIRECTOR AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION P. 0. Drawer 15426 Austin, Texas 78761 March 16, 1979 AGREEMENT FOR THE STATE TO SURVEY, INSPECT, APPRAISE AND INVENTORY BRIDGES ON PUBLIC ROADS AND STREETS Hon. Robert Griffin City of Round Rock 214 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 Dear Mayor Griffin: In order that we may complete the survey, inspection, appraisal and inventory of off - system bridges under your jurisdiction in accordance with Title 23, United States Code as amended, we request that you com- plete the attached forms and return to us as soon as possible. Please attach the necessary authority to execute. Your early attention to this matter will be appreciated. Please contact us if additional information is necessary. CHG /ljb Attachment Sincerely yours, R. A. Brown District Engineer By - aude H. Garrett, I� District Construction Engineer D L DEBERRY AGREEMENT FOR THE STATE TO SURVEY, INSPECT, APPRAISE AND INVENTORY BRIDGES ON PUBLIC ROADS AND STREETS THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 19 , by and between the State Department of1Tighways and Public Transportation, Party of the First Part, hereinafter called the "Department ", and , a local government, or governmen- tal agency or entity, Party of the Second Part, acting by and through its and by virtue of the authority shown on Exhib- it attached hereto and made a part hereof. W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the Party of the Second Part is owner of certain bridges on public roads and streets within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Title 23, United States Code as amended by the Surface Transportation Act of 1978, requires that an inventory, inspection and appraisal be completed of all highway bridges on public roads and streets; and WHEREAS, it is incumbent upon the Department to assure accomplish- ment of this work. A G R E E M E N T NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto to be by them respec- tively kept and performed, as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: 1. The Party of the Second Part hereby grants permission to the Department or its contracted Consultant, to perform on -site surveys and inspections of bridges under its jurisdiction for the purpose of developing inventory and appraisal information and data, and further agrees to furnish available information and data concerning such bridges, to the Department. 2. All of the above described information and data shall be the property of the Department. However, such information and data will be provided to the Party of the Second Part upon request. Attachment 1 -2- 3. Nothing herein is intended to change the respective respon- sibilities under the laws of, this State of the parties hereto. It is expressly understood that the Department's responsibility shall be limited to the reasonably prompt conveyance of information and data described in 2 above to the Party of the Second Part. Respon- sibility for deciding upon the imposition of load restriction, clo- sure, repair or other such action, shall remain that of the Party of the Second Part. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these pre- sent to be executed in duplicate on the day above stated. PARTY OF THE FIRST PART: PARTY OF THE SECOND PART: DISTRICT ENGINEER, STATE DEPART- 'MENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION By: District District No. _ By: Name of Government, or — Coevern- mental Agen of Entity uL Tit e o xec tang icial RESOLUTION NO. c2 // /e WHEREAS, the City of Round Rock, Texas, is the owner of certain bridges on public roads and streets within its juris- diction, and WHEREAS, Title 23, United States Code as amended by the Surface Transportation Act of 1978, requires that an inventory, inspection and appraisal be completed of all highway bridges on public roads and streets, and WHEREAS, the State Department of Highways and Public Trans- portation has submitted a written agreement to the City to provide such inventory, inspection and appraisal service, and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to enter into said agree- ment, now therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, THAT The mayor of the City of Round Rock, Texas, is hereby author- ized and directed to execute on behalf of the City, an agreement with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation to inventory, inspect and appraise certain bridges within the city, a copy of said agreement being attached hereto and incorpor- ated herein for all purposes. ATTEST: • A ol , Ao . Y L ` Mayor City of Round Rock, Texas Cow: =sslov STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS REAGAN HOUSTON CHAIRMAN OE.VITT C GREE. CHARLES E SIMONS Hon. Robert Griffin City of Round Rock 214 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 Dear Mayor Griffin: CHG /ljb Attachment ENGINEER•DIRECTOR AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 8. L OERERRY P. O. Drawer 15426 Austin, Texas 78.761 March 16, 1979 AGREEMENT FOR THE STATE TO SURVEY, INSPECT, APPRAISE AND INVENTORY BRIDGES ON PUBLIC ROADS AND STREETS In order that we may complete the survey, inspection, appraisal and inventory of off - system bridges under your jurisdiction in accordance with Title 23, United States Code as amended, we request that you com- plete the attached forms and return to us as soon as possible. Please attach the necessary authority to execute. Your early attention to this matter will be appreciated. Please contact us if additional information is necessary. Sincerely yours, R. A. Brown District Engineer By ' �frvr zC; / lau = de H. Garrett, I'` District Construction Engineer AGREEMENT FOR THE STATE TO SURVEY, INSPECT, APPRAISE AND INVENTORY BRIDGES ON PUBLIC ROADS AND STREETS THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 19 ,.by and between the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, Party of the First Part, hereinafter called the "Department ", and , a local government, or governmen- tal agency or entity, Party of the Second Part, acting by and through its and by virtue of the authority shown on Exhib- it attached hereto and made a part hereof. W I T N E S S E• T H WHEREAS, the Party of the Second Part is owner of certain bridges on public roads and streets within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Title 23, United States Code as amended by the Surface Transportation Act of 1978, requires that an inventory, inspection and appraisal be completed of all highway bridges on public roads and streets; and WHEREAS, it is incumbent upon the Department to assure accomplish- ment of this work. A G R E E M E N T NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto to be by them respec- tively kept and performed, as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: 1. The Party of the Second Part hereby grants permission to the Department or its contracted Consultant, to perform on -site surveys and inspections of bridges under its jurisdiction for the purpose of developing inventory and appraisal information and data, and further agrees to furnish available information and data concerning such bridges, to the Department. 2. All of the above described information and data shall be the property of the Department. However, such information and data will be provided to the Party of the Second Part upon request. Attachment 1 PARTY OF THE FIRST PART: PARTY OF THE SECOND PART: DISTRICT ENGINEER, STATE DEPART - ¥ NENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION By: -2- 3. Nothing herein is intended to change the respective respon- . sibilities under the laws of this State of the parties hereto. It is expressly understood that the Department's responsibility shall be limited to the reasonably prompt conveyance of information and data described in 2 above to the Party of the Second Part. Respon- sibility for deciding upon the imposition of load restriction, clo- sure, repair or other such action, shall remain that of Party of the Second Part. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these pre- sent to be executed in duplicate on the day above stated. Name of Government, or Goevern- mental Agency of Entity bistrict•Engineer District No. _ By: Title of Executing Official RECEIVED A oR 2 0 1988 COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ROBERT H. DEDMAN, CHAIRMAN JOHN R. BUTLER, JR. RAY STOKER, JR. The Honorable Mike Robinson Mayor, City of Round Rock 214 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 Dear Mayor Robinson: P. 0. Box 15426 Austin, Texas 78761 April 18888988 ENGINEER - DIRECTOR R. E. STOTZER, JR. IN REPLY REFER TO In regards to the National Bridge Inspection Standards, District 14 has commissioned the services of Brown and Root Development, Inc., consultant firm to inspect Off - System bridges in Williamson County. We are sending you three (3) completed bridge inspection reports for your review. A list of the structure numbers, descriptions and a summary of bridge load posting recommendations are included. Each bridge file contains the following documents: Bridge Inspection Report, Form 1085 Bridge Appraisal Worksheet, Form 1387 Other Documents if Required Please acknowledge the receipt of this letter by signing and returning a copy to this office. If you have any questions, please contact Melvin Stephens at 512/836 -8640, Ext. 561. MJS /wl Attachments By: Sincerely, William C. Garbade District Engineer ACRNOOWLEDG N • Signature Thomas A. Ohlendor District Maintenance Engineer BR /NSAP DISTRICT /4 dPa /NO DELETIONS TYPE A Timber TYPE B Steel TYPE C Concrete TYPE D Culverts TYPE E Truss ADDITIONS & REVISIONS TYPE A Timber TYPE B . Steel TYPE C Concrete �/✓T /!i^ T Al.., • n G�i14 z D 0 0 2 0 U BRIOGE IDENTWICAT NUMBER c0 f 20 W 0 0 n<> 00t� U ¢ U VI a 0 0 1- 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 N 5 10 AQka EIOIg4 610 Qq / 3er11112/16 not / 21%16 Elcilif Oint/ I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 III III 1 1 I II1 1I I I I 111 111 I 1 1 BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION . NUMBER CURRENT POSTING (See Below) RECOMMENDED POSTING WEIG}!T ,1MITS !:,BS ) TYPE LIMIT (LBS) SIGN DESIGN AXLE or TANDEM TANDEM AXLE GROSS e cc d G O • CO / • NONE e4W /eE6 4' O /2 /G-00/ NONE Equ /RED 0/220 - GL7/ NONE Eoci . • • Cify COEHUT , NAME /%U/'70' eo Cityy C�FSlIg"L NUMBER 36 75 BRIDGE LOAD POSTING RECOMMENDATIONS (Reference: BRINSAP Manual, Plate 1II -13) WEIGHT LIMIT AXLE OR TANDEM lli R 1: 7Tt‘ lib o n LIMIT TANDEM AXLE LIS RI: 7Tc NEW LIMITS CROSS US AXLE OR TANDEM 113 DATE. 1/2/ /'/ /4 /97 PAGE / 3F / WEIGHT LIMITS GROSS Ili TANDEM AXLE lIS 9— New condition 8 — Good condition —no repairs needed E. DFT ,r � .� g'CPt Fa- �'T Generally good condition — potential exists for minor maintenance • '� •' • • if. 6— Fair condition — potential exists for major maintenance * . � ^ E ► r : 5— Generally fair condition— potential exists for minor rehabilitation �# 4— Marginal condition — potential exists for major rehabilitation FEROZ ALI ISMA(LY 3— Poor condition— repair or rehabilitation required immediately a S 423 p; ru • 2 — Critical condition — bridge should be closed until repairs are complete Ie Q ..• 4 1 — Critical condition —bridge closed but repairable � ' s F� G .......t& 0 — Critic condition —bridge closed and beyond repair Jfpp /i.L N— Not applicable Enter a rating for each element of each component. The rating should equal or exceed the minimum r ling listed to the left of each element. The overall Component Rating should equal the lowest rating of any element of the component. Fully supportive comments are to be made hereon or on attachments for all ratings of 7 or below. I Roadway (Item 58) I Condition Rating I Superstructure (Item 59) I Condition MM. Rating Min. 1 Deck FMI 0 Main Members—Steel WA 6 Wearing Surface IIIIIIITi 0 Main Members—Concrete 6 Joints, Expansion, Open Iii 0 Main Members— Timber am 6 Joints, Expansion Sealed Mi 0 Main Member Connections NM 6 Joints, Other IIII•.» ' 1 Floor System Members �I 6 Drainage System U.= CNN 1 Floor System Connections 6 Curbs, Sidewalks & Parapets 5 Secondary Members ' - . / %r 6 Median Barrier WI 5 Secondary Member Connections 6 Railings WM 6 Expansion Bearings 7 Railing Protective Coating MEN 6 Fixed Bearings IIMii 7 Delineation (curve markers) MI 6 Steel Prot =ctive Coating X11 Other IIIIIIIEI Other . aV-A.- _ _ '., .�1&MN '� Component Rating Component Rating Comments' Comments* Pkt Zip 1.N1,7S ILL -D 1Jvr* -› S. 0( conlr. IPPf?`KAGil( A-r VO4- RAP) 0 E- v/ spAL .$ - itrriH z c e.4eyi S - VYon✓LsP EA-. CA1y l . STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND'PUaUC TRANSPORTATION Form 1086 -1 -1056 District /*,_ County •4(0 Co Sec 1 - Oh4(o 1') Structure f) � CsIMF Description I Pt V PS fr. L)L7r. r r21.d JM}) 31 )T Inspector's Signature Bridge Inspection Record Route rr 6706.14 5T Co-OL t?�. a Cunt Date 3 — I—i�fi District ha- County __[� Cont -Sec 4461 Min. 0 Abutments Caps Above Ground Below Ground or Foundation 0 Intermediate Supports Caps— Concrete Caps— Steel Caps— Timber Above Ground — Concrete Above Ground —Steel Above Ground — Timber Above Ground — Masonry Below Ground or Foundation 5 Collision Protection System 6 Steel Protective Coating Min. Component Rating 4 Channel Banks 4 Channel Bed 5 Rip Rap 5 Dikes 5 Jetties Other Component Rating Form 1085 -2 -10.85 �• • Jr . Substructure (Item 60) Channel (Item 61) tiu EV'B 1JCk pF F[eo9WC? Condition Rating R S r.1 q fs 1.) l4 Comments' Condition Rating 8 ry Ty (,` Comments' Min. Structure 0/ Route (-:? S j 5 Abutment Backwalls & Wingwalls 5 Embankment Retaining Walls 5 Culvert Headwalls & Wingwalls Other Comments' Min. Component Rating 4 Embankments 5 Slope Protection 5 Slabs or Pavements 6 Relief Joints 6 Drainage 6 Guardfence 7 Delineation 7 Sight Distance Other Min. Component Rating 7 Signs 7 Illumination 7 Waming Devices 7 Utility Lines Other Retaining Walls (Item 62) Approaches (Item 65) Miscellaneous IPr r 1? 3t\ LF Condition Rating 8 /J rJ N Condition Rating Comments: ei nfV4-{ k1(% LESS sE'ol )I,f2S = 3 Condition Rating r,1 a1 1.1 8 Comments. Traffic Safety Features (Item 36) The four Traffic Safety Features are assigned a one -digit rating in the space below. The following scale is used in accordance with Section 3.3 of the BRINSAP Manual. 1 — Feature meets currently acceptable standards . 0— Feature does not meet currently acceptable standards N— Not applicable Brid e Bailin: (1st DI it) Transitions (2nd Digit) Rating — 1 1 1 Rating — Approach (3rd Digit) I Approach Guardrail Terminal 14th Digit) Rating — 0 Rating — I K • • STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Form 1307.1-10.86 District MI- County Cont -Sec 16 Structure 01 Route Appraiser's Signature S��`2 Date /Z1 /eqg Bridge Appraisal Worksheet General Features (Items 67 through 72) Items 67 through 72 are assigned a one -digit rating on the reverse side of this form. The following scale is used in accordance with Section 3.2 of the BRINSAP Manual. 9— Condition superior to present desirable criteria 8— Condition equal to present desirable criteria 7 — Condition better than present minimum criteria 6 — Condition equal to present minimum criteria 5 — Condition somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is 4 — Condition meeting minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is 3— Basically intolerable condition requiring high of repair or reconstruction 2— Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority to replace the structure 1 — Immediate repair or reconstruction necessary to put the structure back in service 0 — Immediate replacement of the structure necessary to put back in service N— Not applicable * ZE OF TF KENNETH JAMES STOKES �;P, 63330 • 6 , , 9 014 1 33 ••4444.. �G tiC�NAL 3/ 1 Structural Condition (Item 67) 1 1 Safe Load Capacity (Item 70) 1 CONDITION RATINGS: POSTED LOAD RESTRICTION = , oAJE IR = bt57 Roadway ( +1) =.5 Superstructure 8 AR =8 Substructure = 8 PLATE I11 -5: PLATE III -9: 1 > AR= 7 ADT =FS - IR = H-3 15 I=> AR= 7 b oN v/i su 7ft - 4usAlb'✓ pJt asviw > of 0E.V+01. 2gcoeb5 (Lowest "AR" above governs) Rating — 7 Rating — 7 Roadway Geometry (Item 68) ( 1 Waterway Adequacy (Item 71) 1 PLATE 1II -6 (A,B,C, or D): PLATE III -10: ADT =-0.5 I AR= Br. Roadway Width = U CHECK: Frequency = __7't' 1 AR= , 3 ( (Br. Roadway Width) >(Appr. Widths AR= V' 4 Less Shldrs) 1 -- If- <, then AR max = 3 (Lowest "AR" above governs) Rating— g Rating— 6 Underclearance (Item 69) ( (Approach Roadway Alignment (Item 72) 1 PLATE I1I -7: PLATE III -11: Vert. Clearance = / AR= p Advisory Speed Limit = , AR =6 PLATE II1 -8: / ro _ 30. - -: ' Note: Advisory speed limit may be assumed to equal the posted advisory speed if one exists. Left Clearance = Right Clearance = JJAR= /,f Note: Code "N" if bridge is not over a RR or automotive rdwy. (Lowest "AR" above governs) Rating — Ai Rating — 0 District County Cont -Sec Structure Route Form 1 387.2 -10.85 • .■• - • •^.4"; • 9 — New condition 8— Good condition —no repairs needed OF TF � 1- 7— Generally good condition— potential exists for minor maintenance y4� •••'• .r 6— Fair condition— potential exists for major maintenance (F EROZ 5— Generally fair condition — potential exists for minor rehabilitation 4— Marginal conditon— potential exists for major rehabilitation AL I ISMAILY Poor condition — repair or rehabilitation required immediately '6 •• 4 • • W Critical condition— bridge should be closed until repairs are complete 9 42 863 P� �tr, 1 — Critical condition— bridge closed but repairable 4: S9 • SZ�•v � 0- Critical condition —bridge closed and beyond repair .23.1. /4%. N— Not applicable . , ` ,, Enter a rating for each element of each component. The rating should equal or exceed the minimum rating l isted M the left of each element. The overall Component Rating should equal the lowest rating of any element of the component. Fully supportive comments are to be made hereon or on attachments for all ratings of 7 or below. Roadway (Item 58) 1 Condition Rating I• t S I Superstructure (Item 59) Condition Min. Rating I. Min. 1 Deck 0 Main Members —Steel 4" 6 Wearing Surface N 0 Main Members— Concrete _5 6 Joints, Expansion, Open J 0 Main Members — Timber /J 6 Joints, Expansion, Sealed N 0 Main Member Connections 6 Joints, Other Al 1 Floor System Members N 6 Drainage System Co 1 Floor System Connections 6 Curbs, Sidewalks & Parapets A 5 Secondary Members 6 Median Barrier ' N 5 Secondary Member Connections N 6 Railings 7 6 Expansion Bearings r✓ 7 Railing Protective Coating Ai 6 Fixed Bearings 7 Delineation (curve markers) !') 6 Steel Protective Coating Other Other Rating Component Rating 4 s Component Comments: Commegts• 1, ft Rit•S Pei No (. S 4t.L. oven 1. Cc&I i irrt.4$LE .04-[.C.U'JC. o>= '7k / 2p7p-t -- oht.. n 1 ^44i..../ ' 6 EdPosr' v r'S 0 ✓ _ r /47 or— o,2r DERkr s ctxct� E Ca'9- ,01 MdBot,_ o2A��tae - Ate a to �� Ms, r �a a �3. O VOL- APT../A.. RA-ft/Aid s{s1•t CQneLt Ar N 4M . .., - Mr tiro _ STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Form 1086.1 -10-85 Bridge Inspection Record District 1 County 244) Cont -Sec E - O f 21 Description .5 SP/44./ Con)C O.h.) C6^1C. 1367J7 Inspector's Signature Structure O / Route E-0121(0 Date 3'Z-f4J5 District / Count 2 Cont -Sec C -0I Zi Structure O Route 6 — n / 2. / (o Min. Substructure (Item 60) Min. 0 Abutments Caps Above Ground Below Ground or Foundation 0 Intermediate Supports Caps— Concrete Caps— Steel Ceps— Timber Above Ground — Concrete Above Ground —Steel Above Ground— Timber Above Ground— Masonry Below Ground or Foundation 5 Collision Protection System 6 Steel Protective Coating Component Rating Condition Rating (� 4-t4... SAS . RA4ll gas 4 Channel Banks 4 Channel Be 5 Rip Rap 5 Dikes 5 Jetties Other Channel (Item 61) Component Rating ,tEw:n��ep - 2 - 10 - 55 A) f3 C. rJ AJ N Comments* Condition Rating d 8 8 ti 2 Comments* Min. 5 Abutment Backwalls & Wingwalls 5 Embankment Retaining Walls 5 Culvert Headwalls & Wingwalls Other Comments. — ABUT.. 4P/QF7 4T, „1 D rwl7 - Afsg.¢7 !lib 64 "M;HL.) f3orH 4 j ; Agars M in. 4 Embankments 5 Slope Protection 5 Slabs or Pavements 6 Relief Joints 6 Drainage 6 Guardfence 7 Delineation 7 Sight Distance Other Comments: 1. groMr 4 Min. Retaining Walls (Item 62) Condition Rating N Component Rating 7 Component Rating 7 Signs 7 Illumination 7 Warning Devices 7 Utility Lines Other Approaches (Item 65) b5 ED 012C) co'i ran; fr.-1 Miscellaneous nJc' ✓E Condition Rating 49 /1.04t.H- W , B o&- // Fr Condition Rating v Comments' Traffic Safety Features (Item 36) 1 The four Traffic Safety Features are assigned a one -digit rating in the space below. The following scale is used in accordance with Section 3.3 of the BRINSAP Manual. 1 — Feature meets currently acceptable standards 0— Feature does not meet currently acceptable standards N— Not applicable Bridge Railing (1st Digit) Transitions (2nd Digit) Rating — 0 - Rating — Q I I I Approach Guardrail (3rd Di • It) I Approach Guardrail Terminal (4th Digit) Rating — I ("] I Rating — 0 • STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Form 1387 -1 —10 -8a District! L County ?A- 10 Cont-Sec " 0 1 Z. to Appraiser's Signature 4, , Bridge Appraisal Worksheet General Features (Items 67 through 72) Structure 0 Route E — 0/t/ • Date 3 /5Y1 Items 67 through 72 are assigned a one -digit rating on the reverse side of this form. The following scale is used in accordance with Section 3.2 of the BR /NSAP Manual. 9— Condition superior to present desirable criteria 8— Condition equal to present desirable criteria 7 — Condition better than present minimum criteria 6 — Condition equal to present minimum criteria 5— Condition somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is 4— Condition meeting minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is 3— Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority of repair or reconstruction 2— Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority to replace the structure 1 — Immediate repair or reconstruction necessary to put the structure back in service 0— Immediate replacement of the structure necessary to putback in service N— Not applicable etT DF7F c • .1 • ;9 *� /N .# I :fir KENNETH JAMES STOKES District County Cont -Sec Structure Route Structural Condition (Item 67) CONDITION RATINGS: Roadway ( +1) = Superstructure =� Substructure = !D PLATE III -5: ADT = Z� IR = iJ S C 3,460b al.) VIS bUSF�etj1W ANt povrkt;J of F1'L6),a -'3 (Lowest "AR" above governs) Rating - PLATE III -7: Vert. Clearance = PLATE III -8: Left Clearance = Right Clearance = Roadway Geometry (Item 68) Underclearance (Item 69) = AR= 3 C:=> AR= 6, PLATE III -6 (A,B,C, or D): ADT = ZA; - Br. Roadway Width = /a ' AR = A L CHECK: �� (Br. Roadway Width) 7 (Appr. Width s AR= 4. Less Shldrs) L— If <, then AR max = 3 (Lowest "AR" above governs) Rating - Note: Code "N" if bridge is not over a RR or automotive rdwy. (Lowest "AR" above governs) Rating - Form 1387 -2 -10.85 Safe Load Capacity (Item 70) POSTED LOAD RESTRICTION = ,./oNr IR = Al/5 PLATE III -9: AR= /do r osTfr.'j- /t.Q,EcE5.4i?y Waterway Adequacy (Item 71) Rating - PLATE III -10: Frequency = �� rP - r AR= s Rating - Approach Roadway Alignment (Item 72) Rating - t!/ 5 PLATE III -11: Advisory Speed Limit = 3 — y AR= Z , — @rop 'Doe To %,0,2 sreUL- Cv-)C Note: Advisory speed limit may be assumed to equal the posted advisory speed if one exists. Z Form 536 -1 (Rev. 6/79 BRIDGE SURVEY (MAINTENANCE DIVISION) Highway: County 1kl.i l)iemsnn (i..41;) Control- I= t7129 Structure. n 1 District: 1 Surveyed by Z rr) 1nkLr Date. 3 - 2 - F8 Structure Name: Pi? p \JE - I A-Y Speedometer Reading at beginning of Road- � � M G /�ucr t At Structure- Q a Distance from beginning of Road: b• n 1 Miles General Description. 2 - Pkg-A4 1=t 15-nn r- uR S Ti - rpE,F.w2- A-- m '. iaul_G,.t.±L_Ls_Lepjth is r3P -tai: Z is 9 52,�rjS. �i,nf � ice. 1 5 Clear Width between Curbs 41 43-4 " 7 / 3 5-- rFiaoi/ /�,�- Vertical Clearance. -02�/ Type Dock a Surfacing- Stringers: Spans qt.-I-- Type F' r'ni4C,4 Size '5 ..) Number Spacing S e Controlling Span Length (C -C Bearings) L•p,5 (of_ h3,..1 r^cal Stringers: Spans ) /4 Type —Size Number Spacing Controlling Span Length (C -C Bearings) t Remarks: Sri . t C n/� -to .5t4 .5t4 at' 24 2t) z > 2o, es ) 20 2l� Ii3' j 23 21� -q 32tnc,E n1n.2 es' 28 263 X 2 -284 2 21 ' 7 27 27' Date built ? BSIDce !Jo.1 Inventory structural Rating: lo - uuu. 112 or Posted load Aoseriactiont B y , Sheet No / of 1 Sheets or • r •k IIIIII _ . - RE■ &•=11!■■9■i • !'1I ' _ A I■ II II I II■ Mil E2I iiiiiii�ii iiiaiii1li__ i■■INMIS . �2Iliiiii�ii�ii�i ��H I ��___ 1 --- _ 1 �Fi■i■■n�■eo■■�■�i i 11 = I■■ ■ �i�lilsil 1i11 'i ■r • ■ ■Jf ■ ENI• NUMM■ ilia BM ■.■ . ■■ 1 7 i ll g_ I pi U S • (-1 O 1 cCoa r Form 536 -2 (Rev. 6/79 ) 9 — New condition 4 P.' ............. •••• 8— Good condition —no repairs needed �.... 9 #V 0- Generally good condition— potential exists for minor maintenance � 6— Fair condition— potential exists for major maintenance 5 — Generally fair condition— potential exists for minor rehabilitation FEROZ ALI ISMAILY 4— Marginal condition— potential exists for major rehabilitation .p j 1 44.:47 4 .9 42883 3 —Poor condition — repair or rehabilitation required immediately p 4 “.. i SZt.: 0 2— Critical condition —bridge should be closed until repairs are complete Fs 3 /DNA.- E* 1 — Critical condition —bridge closed but repairable 0— Critical condition —bridge closed and beyond repair N— Not applicable Enter a rating for each element of each component. The rating should equal or exceed the minimum rating listed to the left of each element. The overall Component Rating should equal the lowest rating of any element of the component. Fully supportive comments are to be made hereon or on attachments for aN ratings of 7 or below. Roadway (Item 58) Condition Rating MM. 0 Main Members 0 Main Members— 0 Main Members 0 Main Member 1 Floor System 1 Floor System 5 Secondary 5 Secondary 6 Expansion 6 Fixed Bearings Superstructure (Item 59) J I Condition Rating Min. 1 Deck —Steel /J 1.01 6 Wearing Surface Concrete WM 6 Joints, Expansion, Open — Timber MIN 6 Joints, Expansion, Sealed � Connections S r ' • ,,, 6 Joints, Other Members 6 Drainage System Connections 6 Curbs, Sidewalks & Parapets Members MII 6 Median Barrier Member Connections W)1 6 Railings Bearings N 7 Railing Protective Coating A 7 Delineation (curve markers) B Steel Protective Other Coating iiiiiin mill Other Component Comments' Rating 7 Component Rating Comments' tdr1-rF: oleo rla - .21*.r‘r% 1--, tie, 1 I. IJ,1.4 .L14a GR- A,r.IGcs got.), oty SIV E, 1.- Sm)1114 -E 4 Meta HO1- tiBli:2 t �n^AnIS I 4,1e F1 PI . r4r 4p ")n1 tip+ ars/ , <cna nF 0,,e_ra - r - n( t -t4inA II-CV/1/3'5"g- b./ •,..14.,A15 . Ff8. /A // R21pgi 14) / r STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Form 1085.1 -10.85 r—/ z 54'41. P A Bridge Inspection Record District 1 4 County 04-4, Cont -Sec ,f7/22o Structure 0 / Route A//7ALO Description IJo• 1 11 - 21 1 SPP . 11 P = 9- 5Pd S . P5 co /K.R>vXS . Inspector's Signature q A "'^^+ / Date 3 -2'S t t R R c2 e - District County Min. Min. Component Rating 4 Channel Banks 4 Channel Berl 5 'Rip Rap 5 Dikes 5 Jetties Other Component Rating Cont -Sec Substructure (Item 60) 1 Condition Rating r- hLitroir RIT 0 Abutments Caps Above Ground Below Ground or Foundation 0 Intermediate Supports Caps— Concrete Caps— Steel Ceps — Timber Above Ground— Concrete Above Ground —Steel Above Ground — Timber Above Ground— Masonry Below Ground or Foundation 5 Collision Protection System 6 Steel Protective Coating = 1 Comments. C tnlf -t pn1 A -i r • � 'An. 2 Channel (Item 61) 8 /✓ N 8 N rY 7 Condition Rating 8 8 p4 Comments' . 10a5.2 -10-05 Min. Min. Min. 7 Signs 7 Illumination 7 Waming Devices 7 Utility Lines Other Structure Route Component Rating 4 Embankments 5 Slope Protection 5 Slabs or Pavements 6 Relief Joints 6 Drainage 6 Guardfence 7 Delineation 7 Sight Distance Other Component Rating Retaining Walls (Item 62) 5 Abutment Backwalls & Wingwalls 5 Embankment Retaining Walls 5 Culvert Headwalls & Wingwalls Other Approaches (Item 65) Condition Rating Al A/ Comments' Condition Rating Comments: MisceHaneous Condition Rating A�( Comments: CLIENT JOB NUMBER SUBJECT IJ1 ll (am c,- BASED ON /- - 0/ DRAYANO NUMBER BY fjR, /6MA+Ly CHECKED BY APPROVED BY DATE 3 — 3 -88 . ) g 3 M 14 1 T 1 BRrOevC Ci FT (.J N 12 -3 I r ' 'u CA-Ps (lort,04) co r 11 c42 x 61r )" 3 Not- �tPS (IN rO�, i3��x4zkx3G11 Mtn - 9—..4 �� 42- 11111111 . I S Fr 0 4 1.' - Flex/ Y d I - , _. . 24013041 (0946) CALCULATION WORKSHEE'1 r Or No. PAGE OF Traffic Safety Features (Item 36) i The four Traffic Safety Features are assigned a one -digit rating in the space below. The following scale is used in accordance with Section 3.3 of the BRINSAP Manual. 1— Feature meets currently acceptable standards 0— Feature does not meet currently acceptable standards N— Not applicable Bridge Railing (1st Digit) I Transitions (2nd Digitl Rating — 0 Rating — 1,1 Approach Guardrail (3rd Di, t) i Approach Guardrail Terminal (4th Digit) f Rating — n Rating — l STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Form 1387- 1 -10 -88 Appraiser's Signature /est Bridge Appraisal Worksheet District 14- County Z Z4( Cont -Sec EO 12ZO • General Features (Items 67 through 72) PQ gel Structure O 1 Route — Jo N� Date izelge Items 67 through 72 are assigned a one -digit rating on the reverse side of this form. The following scale is used in accordance with Section 3.2 of the BRINSAP Manual. 9— Condition superior to present desirable criteria 8 — Condition equal to present desirable criteria 7 — Condition better than present minimum criteria 6 — Condition equal to present minimum criteria 5— Condition somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is 4— Condition meeting minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is 3— Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority of repair or reconstruction 2— Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority to replace the structure - 1 — Immediate repair or reconstruction necessary to put the structure back in service 0— Immediate replacement of the structure necessary to put back in service N Not applicable OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO KENNETH JAMES STOKES fo 63330 ° F G 3 le 11 Structural Condition (Item 67) 1 1 Safe Load Capacity (Item 70) CONDITION RATINGS: POSTED LOAD RESTRICTION = ��,q IR = 70c + PLATE III -9: C===> AR= M Roadway ( +1) = /`r I Superstructure = 7 c===> AR= 7 Substructure = 7 PLATE III -5: ADT IR = Tao C> AR= (Lowest "AR" above governs) Rating — I A v / I ' Rating — m Roadway Geometry (Item 68) 1 Waterway Adequacy (Item 71) PLATE III -6 (A,B,C, or D): PLATE III -10: ADT =_,../ Frequency = ,sue 72S 1 ) AR= AR= »j Br. Roadway Width =,..--'-- - CHECK: (Br. Roadway Width) (Appr. Width>AR=A4 - 4 Less Shldrs) L If< , then AR max = 3 (Lowest "AR" above governs) Rating — 1 Rating — I , E3I Underclearance (Item 69) j 1 Approach Roadway Alignment (Item 72)1 PLATE I1I -7: PLATE III -11: Vert. Clearance = / r>. AR= 64 PLATE III -8: Advisory Speed Limit /1:==,). AR= ,. Note: Advisory speed limit may be assumed to equal the posted advisory speed if one exists. Left Clearance = / - Right Clearance l AR= ,J Note: Code "N" if bridge is not over a RR or automotive rdwy. (Lowest "AR" above governs) Rating — A4 Rating — XII District Form 1387 -2 -10.85 County Cont - Sec Structure Route