R-86-828 - 2/24/1986ing, Inc., Now Therefore,
�JQJ
RESOLUTION NO. �p(Q I\
WHEREAS, the City of Round Rock is desirous of making certain improvements
to Cushing Drive and School Days Lane, and 1
WHEREAS, subsurface investigations and pavement recommendations are needed
in order to accomplish said improvements, and
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to accept the proposal of Brent Rauhut Engineer-
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
That the proposal of Brent Rauhut Engineering, Inc. is hereby accepted, and
the Mayor is authorized and directed to sign said proposal, a copy of which,
is attached as "Exhibit A ".
ATTEST:
RESOLVED this 24th day of February, 1986.
JC1ANNE LAND, City Secretary
MIKE ROBINSON, Mayor
City of Round Rock, Texas
io?I
/,{ {N / -
W es✓
February 3, 1986
Mr. Al Wille
City of Round Rock
214 East Main Street
Round Rock, Texas 78664
' Subject: Technical /and Cost Proposals for Subsurface
Investigations and Pavement Recommendations for
Improvements to Cushing Drive and School Days Lane
in Round Rock, Texas
Dear Mr. Wille:
As discussed in our phone conversation of January 24, 1986,
this letter was prepared to transmit our technical and cost
proposals for the subsurface investigations and pavement
thickness recommendations for the proposed improvements to
Cushing Drive and School Days Lane in Round Rock, Texas.
These proposals are enclosed.
The cost proposal is based on our discussion with you and on
information provided by Mr. Michael Graeber of Carlson and
Dippel, Inc. and includes drilling roadway borings that will
be located in the proposed right -of -way. These roadway
borings will generally be drilled to a depth of approximately
five feet below the proposed grade.
We greatly appreciate the opportunity to be of assistance on
this project and look forward to serving you. If you have any
questions or comments concerning either the technical or cost
proposal, please contact me at your convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark P. Gardner
Graduate Engineer
,x4m( g hire -Ge g
,: Gi!ccd 'v ,7aiv Sliztanza
Attachments: Technical and Cost Proposals
MPG : nmf
Joined to Provide Engineering Services
IO214 I.H. 35 North /Austin, Texas 78753/512 837 - 6580, 837 - 0870
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO CUSHING DRIVE AND SCHOOL DAYS LANE
ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
The following is a brief discussion of the Scope of Work for
conducting the Subsurface Investigation and providing Pavement
Thickness Recommendations for Improvements to Cushing Drive
and School Days Lane in Round Rock, Texas, and is based on our
current understanding of the proposed Capital Improvement
Project. The proposed investigation includes subsurface
investigation, laboratory testing,'pavement design analyses,
and preparation of an engineering report.
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS
Bore holes are planned along the existing right -of -way to ad-
equately define the subsurface conditions at the site. For
proposal purposes, it was assumed that bore holes would be
spaced approximately 500 feet apart along the existing Cushing
Drive from Gattis School Road to Logan Street, with one
additional bore hole planned for School Days Lane. The actual
bore hole locations will be determined after authorization to
proceed, and will depend on the current visible pavement
distress, access restrictions, existing utilities, and
proposed pavement section. The locations and depths of the
bore holes should supply representative information for the
project site with regard to the engineering properties of the
materials.
For proposal purposes, it is expected that 8 roadway borings
will be drilled. All of the bore holes will extend to a total
depth of approximately 5 feet below the proposed subgrade
elevation or to an approximate total depth of 8 feet beneath
the existing surface. All of the bore holes are located
within the proposed paved surface. Based on information
provided to this office, there are no significant cut or fill
areas, or structures such as bridges or retaining walls
considered in this work effort.
LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory testing should include unit weight and moisture
content determinations, Atterberg limits, repeated load
triaxial, and sieve analysis tests to classify and determine
the strength properties of the subsurface soils. Sieve
analysis shall be performed on recovered samples of the
existing base materials to determine if this material may be
suitable for reuse in the new pavement structure.
PAVEMENT THICKNESS DESIGN AND PREPARATION OF ENGINEERING
REPORT
Flexible pavement design alternatives will be prepared for the
proposed pavements. Pavement thicknesses will be determined
for both conventional cross sections and for pavements with
the use of stabilized materials, if conditions warrant
stabilization. Appropriate recommendations shall be provided
discussing materials and quality assurance testing during
construction, as well as any other geotechnical considerations
pertinent to the proposed work effort
An engineering report will be prepared which will document all
field work, laboratory testing, and the pavement thicknesses
recommended. All data and test results will be included in
the report.
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO CUSHING DRIVE AND SCHOOL DAYS LANE
ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
The following costs are estimated on the basis of anticipated
subsurface conditions and our current understanding of the
work desired. Actual costs should approximate this cost
estimate, but may decrease or increase slightly based on the
nature of the soil encountered or additional requirements
levied by the client.
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS
Coordination & Staking *, 12.0 hrs. @ $35 /hr. $ 420.00
Mobilization & Demobilization 200.00
Drill and Sample, 64 if @ $12 /lf 768.00
Traffic Control, 1 day @ $450.00 /day 450.00
$1,838.00
LABORATORY TESTING
Unit Weight and Moisture Content Tests,
5 @ $10 /ea
Atterberg Limit Tests, 10 @ $25 /ea
Repeated Load Triaxial Tests, 3 @ $150 /ea
Sieve Tests, 6 @ $40 /ea
Soil Processing, 3 hrs. @ $35 /hr.
ANALYSIS AND REPORT
Project Manager, 8 hrs. @ $60 /hr.
Graduate Engineer, 24 hrs. @ $45 /hr.
Staff Support, 10 hrs. @ $25 /hr.
$ 50.00
250.00
450.00
240.00
105.00
$1,095.00
$480.00
1,080.00
250.00
$1,810.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS** $4,743.00
Accepted by __1'�
Date e r (o
* Coordination and staking includes locating bore holes, and
coordinating with utility locators to insure that no
underground utility lines are affected by drilling operations.
* *Total Estimated Costs do not include the cost of horizontal
and vertical control on bore holes. We anticipate that
Carlson and Dippel, Inc. will provide surveying services for
the vertical and horizontal location of the bore holes. If we
must provide these services, all surveying costs will be
charged on the basis of cost plus 10 percent.
d den 2 �,,a ►t�
ry, yof F,1.
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO CUSHING DRIVE AND SCHOOL DAYS LANE
ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
The following costs are estimated on the basis of anticipated
subsurface conditions and our current understanding of the
work desired. Actual costs should approximate this cost
estimate, but may decrease or increase slightly based on the
nature of the soil encountered or additional requirements
levied by the client.
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS
Coordination & Staking *, 12.0 hrs. @ $35 /hr. $ 420.00
Mobilization & Demobilization 200.00
Drill and Sample, 64 if @ $12 /lf 768.00
Traffic Control, 1 day @ $450.00 /day 450.00
$1,838.00
LABORATORY TESTING
Unit Weight and Moisture Content Tests,
5 @ $10 /ea
Atterberg Limit Tests, 10 @ $25 /ea
Repeated Load Triaxial Tests, 3 @ $150 /ea
Sieve Tests, 6 @ $40 /ea
Soil Processing, 3 hrs. @ $35 /hr.
ANALYSIS AND REPORT
Project Manager, 8 hrs. @ $60 /hr.
Graduate Engineer, 24 hrs. @ $45 /hr.
Staff Support, 10 hrs. @ $25 /hr.
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS **
Accepted by
Date
$ 50.00
250.00
450.00
240.00
105.00
$1,095.00
$480.00
1,080.00
250.00
$1,810.00
$4,743.00
* Coordination and staking includes locating bore holes, and
coordinating with utility locators to insure that no
underground utility lines are affected by drilling operations.
* *Total Estimated Costs do not include the cost of horizontal
and vertical control on bore holes. We anticipate that
Carlson and Dippel, Inc. will provide surveying services for
the vertical and horizontal location of the bore holes. If we
must provide these services, all surveying costs will be
charged on the basis of cost plus 10 percent.