R-87-1016 - 7/9/1987 RESOLUTION NO. 1016&
WHEREAS, sales tax receipts for the State of Texas and
for cities across the state have been steadily decreasing;
and
WHEREAS, sales tax receipts for the City of Round Rock
are down; and
WHEREAS, the City faces ever-increasing service demands
for public safety, water, wastewater, solid waste disposal,
and other services; and
WHEREAS, the Texas economy is undergoing fundamental
changes, shifting from reliance on oil, gas, and other natural
resources to an economy based heavily on information, services,
and trade; and
WHEREAS, the current sales tax system relies too heavily
on the old economy, leaving most of the new economy untaxed;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
That the City Council endorses and will actively support
efforts to broaden the sales tax base to include taxation of
services, but to retain exemptions for food, drugs, medicine,
medical services, and medical supplies; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED
That the City Council urges the State Legislature to
enact the legislation necessary to expand the sales tax base
and to grant Texas cities the authority to impose a one-cent
optional city sales tax on the expanded base.
RESOLVED this 9th day of July, 1987.
MIKE ROBIN90N, Mayor
City of Round Rock, Texas
ATTEST:
Q22,22� hmat -
VANNE LAND, City Secretary
RECEIVED JUN 2 0
TML
T E X A S
MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
June 18, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO: Selected Mayors
FROM: TML Staff
SUBJECT: June 24th Press Conference
As you may know, TML President Bob Bolen, Mayor of Fort Worth, has called a
press conference for Wednesday, June 24th, in the Speaker's Committee Room in
the State Capitol Building..
The purpose of the press conference will be to announce TML support for
expansion of the state sales tax base. By now, you have probably received an
invitation to attend that press conference.
Attached for your information is a "white paper" describing the Board-adopted,
TML position on expansion of the sales tax base. Also included is a model
resolution which your council/commission may wish to adopt after it has been
rewritten to include information specific to your city.
If you have any questions or if we can help you in any way, feel free to call at,
any time.
C
C"
,b
211 East Seventh,Suite 1020 • Austin,Texas 78701-3283 • (512)478-6601
04
z1 3-D�'76 c,�
Ad
BROADENING THE STATE SALES TAX:
THE MUNICIPAL PERSPECTIVE
The Texas Municipal League supports legislative efforts to broaden the state
sales tax base. The League has adopted this position because: (1) Texas cities
face the same fiscal crisis which is faced by the state, and (2) the League's
members believe that a broadened sales tax will accurately reflect the state's
tax base, now and in the future.
Any extension of the sales tax to services currently exempt would produce
desperately needed municipal revenue at a time when the fiscal crisis faced by
cities mirrors that of the state. In fact, the similarities between the state's
budget squeeze and that faced by Texas cities Is striking:
• Sales tax revenues - just as the state faced a mid-year revenue
downturn, cities across the state are facing shortfalls which
require immediate attention.
• The oil and gas sectors - just as state revenues from the oil and
gas sectors have fallen, cities across the state are facing
declining property tax revenue from oil and gas-producing property
and related service industries.
• Increasing service demands - just as the state faces increased
costs for prison and MH/MR facilities, cities are facing increasing
demands for police and fire protection, water and wastewater
services, street and road construction and other services for an
ever-increasing population.
• Federal assistance - just as the state has experienced a drop in
federal assistance, so have cities been hit with the elimination of
key federal programs, including the $240 million dollar General
Revenue Sharing program.
• Cost-cutting and revenue enhancement - just as the state has been
forced to impose additional taxes and to cut costs, so have cities
turned to increased property taxes and fees, hiring freezes,
employee lay-offs, and postponement of capital spending to address
the budget crisis.
• Temporary solutions - just as these measures have not permanently
solved the state's fiscal squeeze, neither have cities permanently
solved their budget problems.
• Need for an expanded sales tax base - just as the state is
considering an expanded base, so do cities wish to expand the base
such that it accurately reflects the state's economic strength.
The League believes that large sectors of the Texas economy--particularly the
service sectors--are under-represented in the sales tax base, because the sales
tax system was put in place before these sectors became significant parts of the
Texas economy. To include them in the base would be more equitable and more
reflective of current economic realities.
- 1 -
The most recent sales tax statistics show that for FY 1987, city sales tax
collections are down 6.7 percent from the comparable period In the previous
year. It is interesting to note what those decreases have meant for the state's
largest cities.
• Houston - sales tax receipts are down 9.2 percent from last year.
Houston faced a budget shortfall of $44 million. The city has
turned to a hiring freeze, reduced services, and a variety of
additional measures in the current budget year.
• Dallas - sales tax receipts are down 5.5 percent. The total budget
shortfall was found to be $15 million, forcing Dallas to
immediately reduce or freeze salaries, cut services, and impose a
hiring freeze.
• San Antonio - sales tax collections have fallen by over 6 percent.
Faced with a shortfall of $22.7 million, the city imposed a hiring
freeze and such reduced services as street maintenance and drainage
improvements.
• Austin - with sales tax receipts down by 8.33 percent and facing a
total shortfall of $20 million, Austin has frozen hiring, reduced
services, and imposed mandatory employee furloughs. ,
In addition, Fort Worth's sales tax receipts are down by 9.51 percent, Corpus
Christi's by 9.91 percent, Arlington's by 4.36 percent, Midland's by 14.55 per-
cent, and Odessa's by 21.29 percent.
Smaller cities have been hard-hit, as well. For example, in Ellis County,
south of Dallas, the twelve small or medium-sized cities have seen sales tax
collections drop by an aggregate 26.6 percent.
Cities across the state are dealing with revenue shortfalls by turning to a
combination of expenditure cuts and revenue enhancements to balance their
budgets. A recent Texas Municipal League survey of almost 400 Texas cities
revealed that nearly 57 percent of the state's municipalities are experiencing
revenue shortfalls in their current budget years and are being forced to take
quick budgetary action. (See Exhibit 1.)
Exhibit 1
Percentage of Cities Which Are Facing
Revenue Shortfalls This Budget Year
Population Percentage
Less than 2,000 46.7
2,001 - 5,000 57.7
5,001 - 10,000 65.3
10,001 - 25,000 54.7
More than 25,000 62.2
All Cities 56.8
- 2 -
Many cities expect revenues to decline even further (see Exhibit 2); this is
particularly true of mid-sized cities. Moreover, nearly one-third of all
Texas cities will experience revenue shortfalls this year and expect even less
revenue next year.
Exhibit 2
Percentage of Cities Which Expect
Lower Revenues Next Budget Year
Population Percentage
Less than 2,000 37.3
2,001 - 5,000 47.1
5,001 - 10,000 51.0
10,001 - 25,000 34.0
More than 25,000 35.1
All Cities 42.7
Texas cities have been forced to respond to this fiscal crisis by reducing
expenditures and, to the extent possible, raising revenues. They are most
likely (58.1 percent of cities) to turn to increased user fees. Beyond that,
cities have postponed or deferred capital spending (46.7 percent) or have raised
property taxes (45.1 percent).. Smaller'percentages of cities have imposed wage
freezes (28.4 percent), imposed hiring freezes (21.8 percent), laid off
employees (15.1 percent), or reduced services (10.3 percent).
The three most common reactions each present cause for concern:
1. Raising user fees--there is clearly a limit to this revenue-
raising strategy. Most cities which have raised user fees
increased either water rates (34.2 percent), wastewater rates
(29.2 percent), or garbage collection fees (25.5 percent). This
strategy is, at best, one that can be employed only periodically.
2. Raising property taxes--here again, there are practical and legal
limits. Cities which raised property taxes, raised them by an
average of 4.4 percent. As a result, a large number of Texas
cities have little or no "fiscal elbow room" with regard to
property taxation, without facing taxpayer unrest or a rollback
petition.
3. Deferring or postponing capital spending--this strategy is
perhaps most concerning. Cities which opt for this strategy are
most likely to defer street improvements (29.2 percent), water
distribution facilities (18.6 percent), or wastewater system
improvements (14.1 percent). This is happening at a time when
that capital spending is so desperately needed for economic
development. Most troubling of all is the fact that nearly 40
percent 'GF Texas cities will turn first to further delays in
capital spending if revenues remain stagnant.
- 3 -
s
In short, the League's survey reveals that the current fiscal squeeze is just as
real for Texas cities as it is for the state government, and that city councils
and commissions throughout the state continue to face the same tough decisions
faced by the State of Texas.
As a result, the Texas Municipal League strongly endorses the extension of sales
tax to currently exempt services (excluding food and medical/dental care)
complete with authority for cities to impose the local option, one-cent sales
tax on the expanded base. The League estimates that if the sales tax is
broadened in this way, the cities which impose the local option sales tax would
collect approximately $228 million in additional sales tax over the FY 88-89
biennium. Depending on a wide variety of economic variables, municipal sales
tax collections would increase by approximately 12 to 16 percent.
- 4 -
Resolution �
WHEREAS, sales tax receipts for the State of Texas and for cities across
the state have been steadily decreasing; and
WHEREAS, sales tax receipts for the City of are down—bv--
and
WHEREAS, the city faces ever-increasing service demands for public
safety, water, wastewater, solid waste disposal, and other services; and
WHEREAS, the Texas economy is undergoing fundamental changes, shifting
from reliance on oil, gas, and other natural resources to an economy based
heavily on information, services, and trade; and
WHEREAS., the current sales tax system relies too heavily on the old
economy, leaving most of the new economy untaxed;
NOW, „THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council[,-�",;
G �Cf'at the City Council irk endorses and will actively support
efforts to broaden the sales tax base to include taxation of services, but to
retain exemptions for food, drugs, medicine, medical services, and medical
supplies; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council,foWzr9rr-
urges the State Legislature to enact the legislation necessary to expand the
sales tax base and to grant Texas cities the authority to impose a one-cent,
optional city sales tax on the expanded base.
DATE: July 7, 1987
SUBJECT: Council Agenda, July 9, 1987
ITEM: 12B - Consider a resolution supporting sales tax on
certain services.
Mayor Robinson asked that this item be placed on the agenda.