Loading...
R-89-1284 - 5/25/19891. Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, beginning the first Monday in June and ending the last Friday in August for the specific pur- pose of hosting YMCA Day Camp. 2. The YMCA may host one overnight campout per session, provided it is held on a week night, other than Friday. The Park Curfew (Ordinance 2126) will be waived for these functions. 3. The YMCA may reserve Rabb Recreation Center one (1) time per month for special functions during evening and /or weekend house of operation for an additional fee. 4. The Day Camp site will be located east of a line from the southeast corner of the Recreation Center to Brushy Creek and west of a line from the southwest corner of the Recreation Center to Brushy Creek. 5. The YMCA shall not conduct their program in the yard between the Recreation Center and Brushy Creek in- cluding the steps to the creek. The YMCA has use of the picnic tables under the shade trees (west of the driveway to the garage) and the storage shed. 6. The recreation center shall not be used for day camp purposes, except for the use of the garage for clothes changing. 7. The YMCA shall provide all program supplies and equip- ment to conduct the Day Camp program. 8. The YMCA may use the swimming pool except when the City determines in its sole discretion that such use would interfere with a function being held in the recreation center (house). 9. The lifeguard on duty shall test the water chemistry prior to participants using the pool. 10. Fees shall be assessed as follows: Day Camp - $50.00 per session Special Functions - $50.00 per event (does not in- clude parent's night or campout unless the house is used) 2. Damages - Prior to the opening of the first session, representatives from the City and The YMCA will meet to do a property survey and inventory. At the end of the last session, a final survey and inventory will be taken to determine any damages (excluding of grass). The YMCA will be re- sponsible for repairing or re- placing all damaged or missing property. II. The CITY shall be responsible for the overall maintenance and operations of the park grounds, recreation center and swimming pool. The CITY will mow, trim and perform other routine grounds maintenance tasks every other week as deemed necessary. The areas to be main- tained will be predetermined by a PARD and YMCA representative. Requests for PARD Staff to perform tasks above and beyond routine maintenance must be submitted in writing. Prior to the commission of the request, the YMCA will be notified, if a fee is to be charged. A PARD representative will train a YMCA employee to monitor the automatic water chemistry equipment. The CITY will provide water chemistry test kits. PARD will also train a YMCA staff member to use the pool vacuuming equipment. The CITY will allow a temporary telephone extension to be installed to the outside of the house for the use of a telephone. The YMCA shall provide the telephone instrument, and shall be responsible for any long distance telephone calls made from such extension. III. a. CITY shall not be liable or responsible for, and shall be saved and held harmless by YMCA from and against any and all claims and damages of every kind, for injury to or death of any person or persons and for damage to or loss of property arising out of or atttributed, directly or indirectly, to the operation of the Day Camp. b. YMCA shall carry insurance and furnish to the City a Certificate of Insurance certifying coverage for Comprehensive General Liability with minimum Bodily Injury Limits of $1,000,000 for each occurance and Property Damage Insurance with minimum limits of $500,000 for each occurance. 3. IV. Term The term of the Agreement shall be for three (3) years and may be shortened or extended, by the written consent of both parties. V. Notice a. This notice required or permitted to be delivered hereunder shall be deemed received when sent by United States mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: To the CITY: To the YMCA: City of Round Rock President Parks and Recreation P.O. Box 1176 Department Round Rock, Texas 78680 221 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 Texas Law to Apply B. This contract shall be constructed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas. Parties Bound c. This contract shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, admin- istrators, legal representatives, successors and assigns where per- mitted by this contract. Legal Construction d. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this contract shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable such holding shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this contract shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. Prior Agreements Superseded e. This contract constitutes the sole and only agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements between the parties respecting the within subject matter. 4. Time of Essense f. Time is of the essence of this contract. Gender Words of any gender used in this contract shall be held and construed to include any other gender, and words in the singular number shall be held to include the plural, and vice versa, unless the context requires otherwise. Authority This Agreement was entered into by the YMCA pursuant to authority granted by its Board of Directors on the Z day of , 1989, whereby the President was authorized to execute this reement on behalf of the YMCA, a copy of which authorization is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Dated this oC day of 5. CITY OF ROUND ROCK By: MIKE ROBINSON, MAYOR ATTEST: , 1989. E LAND, AS ISTANT CITY AGER/CITY SECRETARY DATE: May 23, 1989 SUBJECT: Council Agenda, May 25, 1989 ITEM: 13B. Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to enter into an agreement with the YMCA for the summer use of Rabb Park. STAFF RESOURCE PERSON: SHARON PRETE STAFF RECJNPEMIDATION: The YMCA has requested the use of Rabb Park for its Day Camp Program. The agreement is for a three (3) years and does not prohibit the use of the recreation center by other organizations. ECONOMIC IMPACT: A fee is being assessed the YMCA to help offset the costs of maintenance and operation of the site. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to conduct a feasibility study regarding the construction of a multi - purpose stadium located in the Round Rock area; and WHEREAS, a multi - purpose stadium would enhance and promote tourism and the hotel /motel industry; and WHEREAS, LC�/L� has submitted a proposal to conduct said feasibility study; and WHEREAS, the City has funds earmarked for economic development purposes from the repayment of loans made with a Community Development Block Grant, Now Therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, That the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City a contract with ' � T�'ZGYI( to conduct a feasibility study regarding the construction of a multi - purpose stadium, and that payment for said study shall be paid from funds received in repayment of loans made from a Community Development Block Grant. RESOLVED this 25th day of May, 1989. ATTEST: C43RESSTADI LAND, City Secretary RESOLUTION NO. is U / MIKE ROBINSON, Mayor City of Round Rock, Texas DATE: May 23, 1989 SUBJECT: Council Agenda, May 25, 1989 ITEM: 13C. Consider a resolution authorizing the expenditure of funds for a multi - purpose stadium feasibility study. STAFF RESOURCE PERSON: Bob Bennett STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff and three Councilmembers have interviewed three consulting firms to investigate the feasibility of the City building a multi- purpose stadium. Specifically, we are looking for a scope of work that includes site analysis, financial feasibility and economic impacts. Staff is still working with the consultants in order to get a proposal for your consideration this Thursday. ECONOMIC IMPACT: ± $15,000 to come from remaining grant funds. We have set -up a transfer of $10,000 from grant funds to Hotel /Motel. If the proposal is ± $15,000, we will need to draw down grant funds an additional ± $5,000. Local ad valorum taxes are not being spent on this project. HNTB May 22, 1989 The Honorable Mayor Mike Robinson City of Round Rock 221 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS 9200 Ward Parkway Kansas City, Missouri 6✓i114 PO. Box 419299 Kansas City, Missouri 64141 (816) 3334800 Dear Mayor Robinson: HNTB is pleased to submit this proposal for professional services related to site analysis and financial feasibility for the construction of a minor league ball park in Round Rock, Texas. SCOPE OF WORK As discussed in our meeting with you, your staff and councilmembers on Wednesday, May 17th, the scope of our proposed services would include the following: SITE ANALYSIS 1. Site Identification: Potential sites identified within the City limits which meet basic criteria for the ball park (maximum of 10). 2. Site Evaluation: Analysis of each site through a matrix of criteria to rank each site to determine which are most conducive to the project. 3. Site Concept: Development of site plans on each of the two highest ranked sites with recommendation for the best solution. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY HNTB will contract with the accounting firm Coopers & Lybrand of Minneapolis, Minnesota to create a financial model for the project based upon industry standards for minor league ball parks. The following issues will be addressed: 1. Operating Costs: Projection of anticipated operation expenses for the first five (5) years of the ball park. The Honorable Mayor Mike Robinson May 22, 1989 Page 2 2. Revenues: Projection of potential revenues for the first five (5) years of the ball park. 3. Financing: Investigation of financing mechanisms available for the construction of the ball park (limited to three (3) options). Upon completion of the scope of work, HNTB will deliver six (6) copies of a site study booklet documenting the process of site selection, site concept plans and financial feasibility. OWNER FURNISHED INFORMATION The City of Round Rock shall provide aerial surveys topo maps, plat maps, written legal descriptions and other information pertaining to site identi- fication and analysis. SCHEDULE we anticipate completion of the scope in 45 days from the notice to proceed. Furthermore, we anticipate a total of four (4) person trips to Round Rock to complete the scope of services, including a final presen- tation of our recommendations. COMPENSATION Compensation be a lump fee of $15,580.00 including expenses for travel and subsistence payable upon completion of the scope of work. If the project schedule extends beyond 45 days through no fault of HNTB or it's consultant(s), additional compensation will be required for labor and expenses incurred until the project is completed. If additional meetings are requested by the City of Round Rock or its representatives, the costs associated with labor and expenses will be reimbursed by the City of Round Rock. Cost for additional copies (if desired) of the site study booklet shall also be reimbursed by the City of Round Rock. TERMINATION Either party may terminate this agreement upon receipt of seven (7) days written notice from the other party. In this event, compensation and reimbursable expenses due to date and the work performed shall be due and payable immediately. PERFORMANCE HNTB will perform their services within the limits provided by this contract, with the usual thoroughness and competence of the architectural and engineering professions. No other warranty or representation either expressed or implied, is included. It is understood that HNTB does not guarantee probable construction costs nor estimated construction schedules. • The Honorable Mayor Mike Robinson May 22, 1989 Page 3 The cost of an Economic Impact Statement is not included in this proposal. We believe the scope of this service can be more accurately determined after the site and financing study has been completed. If this proposal meets with your approval, please sign and return one copy to this office. HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF l' , k MILLER, AIA BENJAMIN WHISLER, P.E. P NCIP ARCHITECT ASSOCIATE DI'. "` :" OF SPORTS ARCHITECTURE :tls ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK: Date: • ' Proposal for Professional Services 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Laventhol & Horvath 1 Certified Public Accountants 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I4 Laventhol &Horwath Certified Public Accountants Mr. Bob Bennett City Manager City of Round Rock 221 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 Dear Mr. Bennett: May 23, 1989 Ashley Tower 100 South Ashley Drive Suite 1500 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 228 -7555 Laventhol & Horwath (L &H) in association with Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum (HOK) is pleased to submit this proposal which outlines a scope of services our team is capable of providing you in regard to evaluating issues associated with bringing minor league baseball to Round Rock. We believe the team assembled for this study is uniquely qualified to address site, operational, economic and financing issues associated with a minor league stadium. The following sections describe our team, scope of services and fees. Additional qualifications and resumes of key staff who will be working with you have also been included. PROJECT TEAM The Tampa office of L &H is uniquely qualified to assist your community in this specific industry. L &H's Sports Consult- ing Group, which is centered in our Tampa office, is involved in development planning and feasibility analysis for stadiums, arenas, and convention centers throughout the United States. During the past several years, more than two dozen cities have retained Laventhol & Horwath's (L &H) Sports Consult- ing Group to perform feasibility studies, economic and fiscal impact analyses, site analyses, utilization studies and other services related to the development of stadiums, arenas, race tracks and other sports related facilities. Laventhol & Hor- wath's Sports Consulting Group is uniquely qualified to address site selection, economic and fiscal benefits associated with a professional baseball franchise and professional sports stadium as well as addressing financial performance and alternative methods of financing a new stadium. Over the last five years alone our group has prepared economic and financing impact assessments for the following projects /teams: o Columbia Mets Minor League Stadium, Columbia, South Carolina o Plant City Spring Training Facility and Minor League Stadium (Cincinnati Reds) A member of Horwath & Horwath International with affiliated offices worldwide. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Bob Bennett 2 May 23, 1989 o Citrus County Spring Training Facility and Minor League Stadium (MLB Team) o Fort Myers Spring Training Facility and Minor League Stadium (MLB Team) o Chandler Spring Training (Brewers) o New York Sportsplex (NFL Team /MLB Teams) o Baltimore Stadium (NFL Team /Baltimore Orioles) o Chicago White Sox Stadium (White Sox) o Milwaukee Brewers Stadium (Brewers) o Georgia Dome (Atlanta Falcons) o Proposed Dallas MLB Stadium (Texas Rangers) o St. Louis Stadium (St. Louis Football Cardinals) o Tampa Baseball Group /Domed Baseball Stadium (MLB Expansion Team) o Cleveland Domed Stadium (Cleveland Indians) o Citrus Bowl /Proposed Domed Baseball Stadium (Citrus Bowl /MLB Team) Of these studies, our work for five spring training/ minor league complexes as well as MLB teams (White Sox, Brewers, Indians, etc.) are most applicable to your needs. In these cases, detailed feasibility as well as economic and fiscal impact analyses were performed including comprehensive evaluations of the impact an MLB /minor league team (as tenant) and stadium operations would have on a community. Our current work in Columbia, South Carolina includes assisting that community in selecting a new site for a minor league stadium. Likewise, our work was used to determine such items as lease terms, financing and stadium sizing. In all cases, this analysis was crucial in determining future community involvement or private participation in capital facilities planning. Our understanding of the operational characteristics of sports facilities, the relationship between teams and facility management, and our extensive data base are a product of our on- going work in this specialized field. For your information, we have provided our qualifications in the sports facilities field and resumes of the staff that would assist you on this project. HOK has been added to our team to provide technical assistance on physical /program evaluation and site analysis. HOK is nationally recognized as the premier design firm for sports facilities including stadiums. Among HOK's various projects the following minor league stadiums have bearing on your project: o Pilot Field, Buffalo Bisons o Hoover Stadium, Birmingham Barons o Stanley Coveleski Stadium, South Bend, Indiana o Ed Smith Stadium, Sarasota White Sox o Joe Engel Stadium, Chattanooga Lookouts o Proposed Minor League Stadium, Springfield, Missouri o Proposed Minor League Stadium, Wyoming, Michigan o Durham Baseball Stadium, Durham Bulls 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Bob Bennett 3 May 23, 1989 These and other projects, which are described in greater detail in the appendix, resulted in site evaluation, master planning, or detail design and construction. The expertise HOK provided for these communities will be applied as necessary to your project. Based on our meetings with you and subsequent conversa- tions we have outlined a three - phased scope of services. SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase I - Market /Site Analysis A full blown market or feasibility study in its truest form is probably unnecessary. However, it appears that certain questions about market growth, economics and demographics are pertinent for any decision on a new site and size of the stadium. Part of the work we would propose in this area would touch upon the following: o Market area analysis (growth trends, economic factors) o Potential future levels of usage (number of games, average attendance, total attendance) o Potential for other (non -minor league) uses o Site evaluation The product of this effort would be an assessment of market support for minor league baseball in Round Rock, estimates of attendance potential for the team, and the impact various site locations might have on the team's ability to achieve maximum draw. Included in the site evaluation will be such factors as: o Availability of land (public /private) o Potential costs associated with acquiring property o Land holding capacity (stadium, parking, etc.) o Traffic (ingress and egress) o Image /market orientation o Potential opportunities /constraints on operations o Physical issues (environmental, soils, etc. as appropriate) Phase II - Economic /Fiscal Impact Analysis In order to better understand the various impacts to Round Rock from a minor league team and the operation of a sports stadium, L &H will address the following areas: o Economic impacts o Fiscal impacts o Unquantified "intangible benefits" o Stadium operations 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Bob Bennett 4 May 23, 1989 The economic and fiscal impact analysis will primarily be driven by the following components: o Team spending o Fan spending (inside and outside stadium) The expenditures under each of these categories will result in direct employment and income as well as indirect or "spin off" impacts; the combination of these impacts being much larger than the initial direct expenditures associated with the on -going operation of the stadium and the team. Based on the data we have in our files and information supplied by existing teams and cities, as well as the results of surveys conducted by our other teams, we will estimate direct spending of the team, fans and stadium operation. Using an economic model developed by the government, we will determine appropriate economic impacts. Based on our analysis of direct and indirect economic impact, we will estimate annual fiscal benefits to the City /County from the operation of the stadium and the team. The final product of this modeling effort will be estimates of direct, indirect and total economic and fiscal impacts to include: o Annual operations: - Estimate new jobs - Total income - Total expenditures for goods and services o Fiscal impacts: - Sales tax receipts - Income tax - Hotel room tax - Others, as appropriate In addition to these quantifiable impacts, L &H is prepared to address, to the extent possible, the various "intan- gible" benefits the City of Round Rock receives from the stadium and sports team. These benefits include such items as community exposure, the importance professional sports teams have on "quality of life" or the statement it makes about commitment to the City's growth. These factors will all be addressed to the extent possible. Phase III - Financing Options Public assembly facilities have traditionally been financed with public funds. Even though use of public funds are required for the construction and improvement of these facil- ities, communities today use a variety of financing techniques and sources of funding. L &H can assist in the selection of the 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Bob Bennett 5 May 23, 1989 most appropriate funding alternative based on careful considera- tion of local public sentiment, city and state laws, and the financial capacities or preferences of the State of Texas and Round Rock. Potential sources of financing for recommended facil- ities, site acquisition and construction will be identified and the likelihood of support from each source will be estimated. Methods employed by other communities for financing will be identified to guide the evaluation of funding strategies: o Source identification (as applicable): - Joint development revenue (ground leases) - Local and state appropriations - Federal and state appropriations - Revenue bonds (e.g., hotel tax) - Special taxes (e.g., admission tax) - Equity contributions - Private donations - Others, as identified (e.g., ticket bond fee) o Financing Options: All potential (and realistic) sources of financing will be explored and their level of support quantified. Such sources may include, as appropriate: hotel tax revenue and bonds, government grants, donations, private sources. These estimates, by source, will be expressed in terms of annual recurr- ing amounts or one -time amounts, as appropriate. In considering the size of bond issue which could be supported by the current and estimated future level of special tax revenue, it is also important to consider the probability of operating subsidies; and future remodeling, major repair and maintenance expense for the stadium. FEES AND TIMING Based on the scope of work outlined above, we propose a fixed fee for this engagement of $15,000. We anticipated two meetings with you, one at the outset of the engagement and one upon completion of our research. The fee estimate, as presented, assumes the cooperation and assistance of the City in supplying information and data on potential sites. In accordance with our firm's policy, a retainer in the amount of $6,000 will be required upon acceptance of this pro- posal. The balance of our fees will be billed as follows: Three weeks after authorization $ 5,000 Upon delivery of draft report 4,000 We anticipate that the work proposed in this letter can be completed in five to six weeks. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Bob Bennett 6 May 23, 1989 MISCELLANEOUS TERMS OF THE ENGAGEMENT The following paragraphs express conditions and limita- tions which our Firm necessarily states with any engagement of this nature. Our services will not include ascertaining the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to this project, including zoning, other state and local government regulations, permits and licenses. Further, no effort will be made to determine the possible effect on this project of present or future federal, state or local legislation, including any bond restrictions, environmental or ecological matters, or interpretations thereof. Our report will contain a statement to that effect. The conclusions and any prospective financial informa- tion that may be included in our report will be based on es- timates and assumptions from previous studies, information developed from supplemental research, knowledge of the industry and other sources, including certain information that you may provide. These sources of information and bases of significant estimates and assumptions will be stated in our report. Some assumptions inevitably will not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur; therefore, actual results achieved will vary from the estimates, and the variations may be material. Our report will contain a statement to that effect. Further, we will neither evaluate management's effec- tiveness nor be responsible for future marketing efforts and other management actions upon which actual results will depend, and we will so state in our report. The terms of this engagement will be such that we will have no obligation to revise the report to reflect events or conditions which occur subsequent to the date of the report. However, we will be available to discuss the necessity for revi- sion in view of changes in the economic or market factors affect- ing this project. Our report will contain a statement to that effect. Our report will be intended solely for your information and use in development planning and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. We will so state in our report. Otherwise, neither our report nor its contents, nor any reference to our Firm may be included or quoted in any offering circular or regis- tration statement, prospectus, sales brochure, loan or other agreement or document without our prior written permission. Permission will be granted only upon meeting certain conditions. Should you decide to include our report, a summary thereof, or reference thereto, in an offering document or sales brochure, we will need to perform additional procedures and will 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Bob Bennett 7 May 23, 1989 require additional fees, computed at our standard hourly rates for these services, to enable us to permit such use. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED If the proposed scope of services described in this letter meets with your approval, you may authorize us to proceed by signing one copy of this document and returning it to us along with the retainer of $6,000. We appreciate the opportunity to present this letter to you and look forward to working with you on this engagement. I trust this proposal is responsive to your needs. Once you have had an opportunity to review this scope, we can answer any questions or discuss any changes that would result in our work efforts being more responsive to your needs. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: DATE .5 RDB /lg WPLG1080 Sincerely yours, Ronald D. Barton Manager Owen M. Beitsch Principal 1 REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS AND FACILITIES OF THE I LAVENTHOL & HORWATH SPORTS AND CONVENTION FACILITIES CONSULTING GROUP STADIUMS: Atlanta Stadium Atlanta Falcons Atlanta Braves Georgia Tech Aurora (Denver), City of Baltimore Stadium Baltimore Orioles Chandler Spring Training Facility (Arizona) Milwaukee Brewers Chicago White Sox Citrus County Spring Training Facility (Florida) Cleveland Dome Stadium Cleveland State University Cleveland Indians Cleveland Browns Dallas, City of Texas Rangers Ft. Myers Spring Training Facility (Florida) Hamilton, Ontario Hamilton Tigercats Jets Stadium London Sports Stadium Milwaukee Brewers New York State Urban Development Corp. Sportsplex Orlando, City of MLB Stadium, Citrus Bowl Plant City Spring Training Facility (Florida) Cincinnati Reds RFK Stadium Washington Redskins Rome (Italy) Soccer Stadium AS ROMA San Francisco Giants San Francisco, City of San Francisco Giants San Francisco 49ers Shea Stadium New York Mets St. Louis Stadium St. Louis Cardinals St. Louis Blues Superdome New Orleans Saints Tampa Bay Baseball Group ARENAS: Anaheim Arena Proposed NBA Team Boston Garden Boston Celtics Boston Bruins Boston College Boston University Bradley Center (Milwaukee) Milwaukee Bucks Cajundome (Lafayette, Louisiana) Southwest Louisiana State Cleveland State University Cleveland Cavaliers Cleveland Force Concord Civic Center (New Hampshire) Dover Civic Center (Delaware) DuPage County Arena (Chicago) Gwinnett County Civic Center (Atlanta) Hammons Student Center (Springfield) Southwest Missouri State University Kiel Auditorium (St. Louis) Lakeland Civic Center (Florida) Madison Square Garden New York Knicks New York Rangers Milwaukee Exposition Convention Center Arena (MECCA) Milwaukee Bucks Marquette University Minneapolis Arena NBA Timberwolves Nassau Coliseum (Long Island) New York Islanders Norfolk Scope (Virginia) Ocean Center (Daytona Beach) Quad- Cities "Potter" Pavilion (Davenport, Iowa) Quad- Cities Thunder (CBA) Raleigh Major Events Center North Carolina State University Rupp Arena (Lexington) University of Kentucky Shelby County Memphis State University Springfield Civic Center (Massachusetts) St. Louis Arena St. Louis Blues St. Louis Steamers Sun Dome (Tampa) University of South Florida Syracuse Arena (New York) CONVENTION CENTERS: Athens Civic Center (Georgia) Birmingham- Jefferson Civic Center Broward County Convention Center (Ft. Lauderdale) Cervantes Convention Center (St. Louis) Cincinnati Convention Center Curacao International Trade Center Gadsden Civic Center (Alabama) Georgia World Congress Center Greensboro Convention Center (North Carolina) Hynes Convention Center (Boston) Jacksonville Convention Center (Florida) Jacob J. Javits (New York City) Johnson City Convention Center (Tennessee) Lexington Convention Center Madison Convention Center Memphis Convention Center Complex Miami Beach Convention Center Orange County Convention and Civic Center (Orlando) Oregon Convention Center (Portland) Overland Park Convention Center (Kansas City, Missouri) Palm Beach Convention Center Philadelphia Convention Center Port America Convention Center (Washington, D.C.) Portland Convention (Maine) Raleigh Civic Center (North Carolina) Richmond Convention Center Riverside Convention Center (California) Roanoke Exhibition Facility Rochester Convention Center (New York) Rome /Floyd County Civic Center (Georgia) Savannah Civic Center Scottsdale Convention Center Singapore International Exhibition & Convention Center Tampa Convention Center Union Station (Worcester, Massachusetts) Washington State (Seattle) Convention and Trade Center Whitaker's Mill (Williamsburg, Virginia) CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAUS: Broward County, Florida (Ft. Lauderdale) Columbus, Ohio Hillsborough County, Florida Kansas City, Missouri Louisville, Kentucky Orange County, Florida Portland, Oregon Richmond, Virginia San Juan, Puerto Rico Seattle, Washington St. Louis, Missouri Tulsa, Oklahoma Laventhol &Horwath Real Estate Advisory Services SPECIAL PROJECTS: Aqueduct Horse Racetrack (New York) Belmont Horse Racetrack (New York) Big Creek Amphitheater (Atlanta) Circus World Amphitheater (Orlando) Dane County Expo Center Fairgrounds (Madison, WI) East St. Louis Motor Speedway Grand Cypress Equestrian Center (Orlando) Great Woods Performing Arts Center (Boston) IACVB Convention Income Survey Kansas City Trade Mart Los Angeles County Fairgrounds Miami Marine Trade Mart Minneapolis Amphitheater Motor Speedway Study - South Georgia New Orleans Trade Mart Ocean City Amphitheater (Maryland) Osceola County Horse Racetrack (Orlando) Pacific National Exhibition Complex (Vancouver British Columbia) Palm Beach Pavilion Potential for Private Management and Operations Services in Japan Roosevelt Raceway (New York) San Mateo County Fairgrounds Tampa Amphitheater Tampa Aquarium Tampa Trade Mart USTA National Tennis Center Louis Armstrong Arena (New York) Yonkers Raceway (New York) CONVENTION CENTER HEADOUARTERS HOTEL: Embassy Suites /Jacksonville Convention Center (Florida) Orlando /Orange County Convention Center Strategic Plan Peabody Hotel /Orange County Convention and Civic Center (Orlando) Proposed Hotel /Houston Convention Center Proposed Hotel /Miami Beach Convention Center Proposed Hotel /Milwaukee Exposition Convention Center Arena Proposed Hotel /Minneapolis Convention Center Proposed Hotel /New Orleans Convention Center Proposed Hotel /St. Louis Cervantes Convention Center Proposed Hotel /San Diego Convention Center Proposed Hotel /Union Station (Worcester) Ashley Tower, Suite 1500 100 South Ashley Drive Tampa, Florida 33602 (813) 228 -7555. STADIUM FACILITY EXPERIENCE NEW YORK CITY SPORTS FACILITIES STUDY Development Recommendations for a Maior Multi- Purpose Sports Complex The New York State Urban Development Corporation and its Sportsplex Corporation subsidiary retained Laventhol & Horwath (L &H) to evaluate all available options and make recommendations regarding the siting and development of a major multi - purpose sports complex in New York City. The Sportsplex Corporation, appointed by Governor Jack Cuomo, included every major sports entrepreneur in New York. Detailed nationwide market surveys were completed for the seven major professional sports leagues and the horse racing industry in New York. In addition, L &H performed an in -depth evaluation of the use, operations, expansion needs, physical conditions, and tenant performance of nine major facilities in New York City, including Shea Stadium, Yankee Stadium, Armstrong Arena (U.S. Tennis Center), Madison Square Garden, Nassau Coliseum, and the Belmont, Aqueduct, Roosevelt and Yonkers racetracks. The study identified the need to upgrade existing arenas, stadiums, or racetracks, and opportunities to build new facilities that would retain existing teams and attract additional sports franchises and major sporting events to New York City. Other issues involved design concepts, site options, financing, and economic impacts of the Sportsplex development. CHICAGO WHITE SOX Stadium Economic Impact Analysis The Chicago White Sox management team is considering the feasibility of constructing a new multi- purpose baseball stadium. L &H performed an economic impact analysis for three development services: existing operations of the Chicago White Sox and Comisky Park in Cook County, Illinois; proposed operations of the Chicago White Sox and a new open -air stadium in DuPage County, Illinois, in the suburban area west of Chicago; and proposed operations of the Chicago White Sox and a new retractable dome stadium in DuPage County, Illinois. The Sox retained L &H to estimate the direct and induced impacts resulting from spending by the baseball team, the stadium operating entity, as well as fans and other visitors attending ball games and other events at each new facility. Additionally, direct and indirect employment impacts and local and state governmental revenue were estimated for a typical year of stadium operation. Retractable Domed Stadium Feasibility Study In December of 1985, L &H was selected by the Chicago White Sox management team to determine the market and financial feasibility of constructing a multi - purpose domed facility within DuPage County, Illinois, in the suburban area west of Chicago. The proposed stadium would include a retractable roof which could be opened for sporting events or closed to accommodate climate sensitive activities such as basketball, concerts, family events, tradeshows and public shows. Through the course of our analysis, the study was amended to reflect a building program that allowed for an open baseball -only stadium seating 55,000 and an adjacent arena seating approximately 22,000. Attendance Proiections Based upon prior market studies performed for the Chicago White Sox organization, L &H was retained to assess the impact on attendance given a relocation of the White Sox baseball team to a new suburban baseball -only stadium in DuPage County, Illinois. The study was designed to document the difference in attendance levels that the new location would generate over the existing attendance at Comiskey Park in Cook County. STADIUM ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FOR WASHINGTON, D.C. Stadium Development Recommendations for New or Renovated Facilities in Washington, D.C. The District of Columbia Armory Board retained L &H to evaluate various stadium development options and make recommendations for the renovation of RFK Stadium or the development of a new football facility. L &H first performed an analysis quantifying the seating capacity and number of skyboxes required for a National Football League (NFL) or Major League Baseball (MLB) franchise in Washington, D.C. to achieve a financial benefit comparable to the operating revenue realized by NFL or MLB franchises in comparable cities. Detailed financial operating results from a number of NFL and MLB franchises, plus single purpose and multi - purpose open, enclosed and retractable roof stadiums were analyzed for this study. In addition, the study measured the costs and benefits, advantages and disadvantages associated with alternative solutions to stadium needs. This cost benefit analysis quantified the capital costs, stadium operating revenue and expenses and operating revenue to the NFL or MLB franchise for the following development options: open, enclosed and retractable roof single - purpose football stadiums; and a renovated RFK stadium for baseball only. Our analysis provided the City and Armory Board the information required to evaluate alternative development options in terms of their capital costs, revenues to the franchise owner(s) and stadium financial operations. BALTIMORE STADIUM NEEDS ANALYSIS Market Demand and Financial Analysis for a New or Renovated Stadium in Baltimore. Maryland L &H was retained to provide economic and financial consulting services to the Baltimore Mayor's Task Force regarding stadium development options for baseball and /or football events. These options included completely rehabilitating and expanding the existing Memorial Stadium or constructing a new facility at various sites in and around the City of Baltimore. L &H prepared attendance projections for potential Major League baseball, National Football League, and United States Football League stadium tenants, as well as estimates of revenue available to either the City and /or sports franchises. These projections were prepared in a computerized format which allowed detailed sensitivity testing for each stadium development option. L &H also analyzed the development costs versus the economic benefits of locating the stadium at alternative sites. CLEVELAND STADIUM FEASIBILITY Cleveland State University Domed Stadium L &H was retained by Cleveland State University (CSU) to prepare a market analysis with financial projections for a multi - purpose domed stadium, as well as to update our previous sports arena study. The issues addressed in this study included the effect on stadium utilization from use by professional athletic teams, CSU and private sector events or activities, facility design features needed to service the varying interests of potential users, and the projected stadium financial performance based on estimated utilization and operating expenses. Proposed uses /tenants of this new facility include the Cleveland Indians Major League baseball team, concerts, family shows, and consumer shows, as well as CSU activities and events. Development Planning for Sports Arena Complex L &H was selected by CSU to provide financial and development planning assistance for a proposed new sports arena complex. For this assignment, L &H: identified the potential uses of the arena, based upon the expectations of the University and the potential user groups; delineated the physical facilities needed to optimally respond to the potential facility users; developed an annual schedule of facility usage based upon the proper balance of University and non - University sponsored events; prepared an organizational plan; and prepared projections of likely income for the complex. ST. LOUIS MULTI- PURPOSE DOMED FACILITY Market Demand and Financial Analysis for a Domed Stadium /Arena /Exhibition Facility Adjacent to Cervantes Convention Center in St. Louis. Missouri, L &H was retained by the City of St. Louis to determine the economic feasibility of developing a 70,000( +) seat, enclosed, multi - purpose facility adjacent and attached to the existing Cervantes Convention Center. As proposed, this building will have the unique flexibility to the downsize from the 70,000(+) seat stadium configuration to an arena set up with a maximum of 35,000 seats. This transformation will be accomplished via the use of a movable end zone section. The arena configuration can be reduced in increments of 5,000 to a minimum of 15,000 seats. The sight lines for all stadium seats have been designed for arena usage and the arena configuration is separated from the remainder of the facility via a soundproof wall extending to the building ceiling. The building's floor would be directly connected to a proposed 140,000- square foot expansion of Cervantes Convention Center exhibit space through the use of removable and retractable seats. In the exhibition configuration, the facility would provide an additional 200,000 square feet of exhibit space to the existing 240,000 square feet and proposed 140,000 square feet of the Convention Center. Movable partitions and curtain walls would separate the respective lower and upper deck seating from the floor in the exhibition configuration. L &H's work tasks included estimating stadium /arena utilization, projecting the financial operating performance of the facility, and analyzing the new economic and fiscal impacts generated by events held within the building. In addition, we determined the impact of stadium arena events on prior estimates of Cervantes Convention Center utilization. In order to accomplish this, L &H provided an estimate of the number of convention events gained due to facility expansion, as well as the events lost due to the lack of available dates caused by stadium /arena usage. ATLANTA STADIUM STUDY The Georgia Office of Planning and Budget retained L &H to evaluate the needs and opportunities for major sports facilities development within the Atlanta area. The analysis addressed market demand factors, existing facility evaluation and new facility options, and economic /fiscal benefits. Phase I of our research efforts involved estimating the utilization, preliminary financial performance, and preliminary financial performance, and preliminary construction cost for ten different stadium development scenarios at four sites. Phase II work included an evaluation of various forms of management structures which could be suitable for the development options analyzed in Phase I. This analysis was based upon individual case studies of team representatives and facility managers from across the country. Phase II also involved estimating detailed financial generations and economic /fiscal benefits generated by each stadium development scenario. We utilized an economic impact computer model made available to L &H to project the net new impacts and benefits created by facility development. Phase III discussed potential sources of financing for stadium construction and development costs. This phase evaluated illustrative financing plans for stadiums with similarities to the development options under consideration in Atlanta. From this analysis, potential revenue for stadium financing was identified and quantified. Based on L &H's study, the Georgia Office of Planning and Budget has recommended the construction of a domed football stadium adjacent to the Georgia World Congress Center, as well as a new baseball facility at the existing Atlanta - Fulton County Stadium site. MILWAUKEE BREWERS Analysis of Maior League Baseball Lease Terms The Milwaukee Brewers retained L &H to profile lease terms at all publicly owned or operated Major League baseball facilities. Team representatives and facility managers at each stadium were interviewed to obtain major lease terms for such items as facility rental, concessions, parking, and luxury box suite revenue. This information was then used to project the Brewer's potential revenue under other teams' lease agreements with particular attention focused on the five to six franchises that have recently renegotiated their lease terms. For these users we compared revenue to the teams before and after renegotiation of lease terms. Analysis of Parking at Maior League Baseball Stadiums The Milwaukee Brewers retained L &H to profile parking availability at all Major League baseball facilities. This analysis was performed in conjunction with the baseball lease study described above. Our work involved evaluating the number of on -site automobile and bus parking spaces, as well as off -site spaces within a convenient walking distance of the facility. This information was used to develop an "accommodation factor" relating the total number of people that could be accommodated through on- and off -site parking to stadium capacity. Those ratios allowed each facility to be evaluated on a consistent basis. TAMPA BASEBALL GROUP Market and Operational Evaluation The Tampa Baseball Group, Inc. authorized L &H to prepare a market study with financial projections for a multi - purpose, covered coliseum to be built on land owned by the Tampa Sports Authority adjacent to the existing Tampa Stadium. The new facility would be primarily used for Major League baseball, but would be designed, equipped, and operated to accommodate other sports and consumer events such as soccer, boxing, family entertainment events, or other staged productions. The primary objectives of this engagement were to: evaluate the Tampa Bay area as a market for Major League baseball and project attendance for the first five years of coliseum operations; evaluate the feasibility of the proposed coliseum as a multi- purpose facility and project the type, number, and average attendance for non - baseball events; prepare financial operating data for the first five years of coliseum operations, including potential revenue sources and annual operating expenses; and estimate the potential economic benefits to be realized in Hillsborough County as a result of coliseum /team operations. A later phase of the project involved an evaluation of the market support characteristics of proposed skyboxes to be developed in conjunction with the coliseum. CITY OF AURORA (DENVER). COLORADO. STADIUM STUDY Development Planning for Domed Sports Stadium L &H was retained by the City of Aurora, Colorado, to provide preliminary consulting services regarding conceptual and strategic planning for a new domed sports stadium. These issues and options were discussed with the Mayor, other designated City representatives, and potential stadium tenants prior to undertaking detailed market or feasibility studies. Future consulting services include estimating stadium utilization, revenue potential, operating performance, funding alternatives, and economic impact. SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS Conversion of Candlestick Park to a Domed Stadium The San Francisco Giants selected L &H to determine the feasibility of converting Candlestick Park to a multi - purpose domed stadium and to evaluate the long -term financial implications of proceeding with such a conversion. In addition, the scope of work was expanded to review the alternative scenario of building a new stadium in downtown San Francisco. During Phase I of this assignment, L &H determined the number and type of events which might be held in each of the stadium alternatives; conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of the Astrodome in Houston, the King Dome in Seattle, the Superdome in New Orleans, and the Silverdome in Pontiac, Michigan; reviewed existing Candlestick Park facilities and operations; analyzed competitive facilities in San Francisco area; analyzed market potential; estimated number of event days and attendance; and prepared projections of likely operating revenue and expenses for each alternative. During the Phase II work, L &H prepared a 30- year projection of operating revenue and expenses, identified and evaluated sources of funding, and evaluated alternative financing plans for each of the alternatives. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. PENNSYLVANIA Veterans Stadium L &H was retained by the City of Philadelphia to: analyze past attendance levels at Veterans Stadium and to prepare projections of future attendance /utilization levels for the stadium and its two major sports teams, Philadelphia Eagles and the Philadelphia Phillies; comparatively analyze the experience of Veterans Stadium's food and beverage concessions with the experience of other major stadiums which host major football and baseball events; analyze the locations of existing facilities, how they compare to other comparable stadiums and how they serve the spectator; and recommend appropriate facility alterations and additions to maximize their positive effects on stadium per capita expenditures, patron service and concession revenue. LONDON. ENGLAND London Sports Stadium L &H was selected by the International Sports Marketing (ISM) organization to provide consulting services regarding the potential for development of a major sports facility in London, England. The proposed complex would be located on a portion of property being master developed by the London Docklands Development Corporation. L &H was retained to review and evaluate existing economic analysis and supporting documentation prepared for ISM and to advise the organization on general issues related to public assembly facility operations and the competitive environment for stadium and exhibition facilities. L &H also provided an overview of comparable projects located in England, the European Continent, and the United States. SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR'S DOMED STADIUM TASK FORCE San Francisco Domed Stadium The Mayor's Task Force Committee retained L &H to conduct a site analysis, review prior studies and cash flow projections, and provide general market and financial consulting services regarding a proposed domed stadium in San Francisco, California. Additional work tasks could include providing an updated detailed market demand analysis and financial projections for the proposed stadium, as well as designing a financing plan for the project. NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA New Orleans Superdome L &H was retained by the Hyatt Corporation to assist them during the preparation of their proposal to manage the Superdome. In the course of this engagement, detailed operations analysis was conducted, market /utilization potential evaluated, and alternative projected financial operations were prepared based on alternate operating scenarios. Hyatt Corporation ultimately was selected by the State to manage the complex under its newly formed subsidiary, Facility Management Group (FMG). HAMILTON. ONTARIO, CANADA Hamilton Stadium Analysis L &H designed the research program and supervised this study of alternative development options to upgrade stadium facilities. Options evaluated included various renovations /expansions for an existing football stadium as well as development of a new stadium at alternative locations in the metro area. Each option was evaluated in terms of its marketability (utilization) - -given its location and access - -as well as development cost, estimated financial operating performance and capital financing options. CITRUS BOWL. ORLANDO, FLORIDA Economic Impact Analysis and Sources of Financing for a Renovated Citrus Bowl Stadium and a Proposed Domed Baseball Stadium The Board of County Commissioners of Orange County, Florida, and the Orlando /Orange County Professional and Amateur Sports Committee retained L &H to evaluate the economic impact of a renovated Citrus Bowl Stadium and a proposed domed baseball stadium in Orlando, Florida, and to identify sources of financing for the stadiums. L &H completed economic impact studies related to the following: operations of the facilities, expenditures made by the fans and spectators both within the stadium and the community, and impacts associated with a hypothetical major league baseball team. L &H also identified sources and methods of financing the renovations and proposed baseball stadium. The financing /funding analysis included the following areas: tourist and resort tax, sale or lease of box suites and loge seating, joint development revenue, local, state and federal grants, tax increment financing, revenue bonds, and special taxes. PLANT CITY. FLORIDA Plant City Stadium L &H was retained by the City of Plant City to: evaluate market demand, estimate utilization, prepare prospective financial performance estimates, and develop alternative financing /funding methods for a new spring training baseball facility in Plant City (spring training home of the Cincinnati Reds). For this assignment, L &H conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of all spring training facilities in Florida and Arizona. L &H's findings for methods to finance /fund the stadium were instrumental in obtaining a commitment of resort tax funds to help finance construction of the new stadium. FORT MYERS. FLORIDA Feasibility and Economic Impact Analysis for a Proposed Spring Training Baseball Facility in Fort Myers, Florida Surges Properties, Inc. retained L &H to conduct a feasibility and economic impact analysis for a proposed spring training complex in Fort Myers, Florida. During Phase I of this assignment, L &H estimated the type and number of events and attendance which might be held in the spring training complex along with estimates of operating revenue and expenses. During Phase II work, L &H completed an economic impact study related to the following: operations of the spring training complex, expenditures made by the fans and spectators both within the stadium and the community, and the impacts associated with hypothetical major and minor league baseball teams. L &H also identified sources and methods of financing the proposed spring training baseball complex. CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA L &H was retained by Citrus County to conduct a market assessment and feasibility analysis for a proposed spring training baseball facility. In the course of this engagement, L &H conducted a detail market analysis, evaluated potential utilization of the stadium complex, and prepared a five year projection of operating revenue and expenses for the proposed spring training facility. RELATED SPORTS FACILITIES ENGAGEMENTS L &H also performs or has performed accounting and consulting services for the following: Olympic Stadium, Detroit Cleveland Stadium Corporation Chicago White Sox Philadelphia Eagles Philadelphia 76ers Philadelphia Firebirds Portland Trailblazers Kansas City Kings Detroit Red Wings San Diego Chargers Milwaukee Brewers In addition, L &H was retained by Bill Veeck to provide the technical support, advice and guidance during Mr. Veeck's successful acquisition of the Chicago White Sox baseball team. L &H accounting, tax and consulting advisors worked with other members of the acquisition team to prepare all the technical and legal work necessary for the transaction. HOK SPORTS FACILITIES GROUP Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum (HOK) is a full- service organization of architects, interior designers, planners and engineers offcring comprehensive planning and design services for projects located throughout the country and overseas. Founded in 1955, HOK is considered one of the leading design firms and is currently ranked among the top five U.S. architectural/engineering firms. HOK's Sports Facilities Group is recognized as the nations leading architectural firm in major spectator facility analysis, planning, design, luxury suite additions, and facility renovation. Key personnel with the HOK Sports Facilities Group offer over a century of collective experience and involvement in numerous spons and public assembly projects for municipalities, professional teams, and universities. The Sports Facilities Group also serves as the architectural consultant to the National Football League. The Sports Facilities Group's individual participation in such noteworthy projects as the Truman Sports Complex in Kansas City, Giants Stadium, The Silverdome, and the Minnesota Vikings Training Facility, led to their prominence in the design of facilities in almost every aspect of sports. This prominence is best exemplified by the list of prestigious sporting events for which the Group has been commissioned to prepare facilities. These include: The 1980 Winter Olympics/Olympic Center Arena, Lake Placid; the 1985 Super Bowl at Stanford and 1988 Super Bowl in San Diego; The United States Open Tennis Championships, Flushing, New York; The 50th Anniversary Major League All -Star Game at Comiskey Park; and The 1985 NBA All -Star Game. Current notable projects include the Bradley Center Arena for the NBA's Milwaukee Bucks; Joe Robbie Stadium for the Miami Dolphins; the London Docklands Events Center in London, England; the Florida Suncoast Dome in St. Petersburg, Florida; the new ballpark for the Baltimore Orioles; and New Comiskey Park for the Chicago White Sox. The Sports Facilities Group is frequently called upon by the Nation's major cities seeking architectural planning and cost input to help in the acqulsidon of Major League franchises. Working with the Nation's leading economic planners. domed stadia engineers, and urban planners, the Sports Facilities Group has been responsible for numerous stadia utilization and feasibility studies in the United States, Canada and overseas. Through the success of these and other projects, the Sports Facilities Group has established a reputation of unparalleled experience in the feasibility analysis, programming, and design of sports and spectator facilities. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pilot Field Buffalo, New York SPORTS FACILITIES The HOK Sports Facilities Group is the Architect of Record for this two-phased project. Phase One, a 19,000 -seat baseball stadium in downtown Buffalo, accommodates AAA baseball. The stadium is unique in that it was designed to conform with historical buildings in a downtown environment. The exterior is precast concrete with arched window openings at the Mezzanine Level, detailed rustication joints and inset marble panels. Also at the exterior are steel tube arch shapes supporting the Club Level balcony, decorative grillework as handrails and omamental features, exposed steel tube trusses, standing seam metal roof, and ten-foot diameter cupolas at the ends of the stadium. The stadium is used for AAA baseball, however major league amenities are provided including a Stadium Club which will seat 300 with a view to the field, 40 luxury suites, large press facilities, team offices, and plush team clubhouses, The implementation of Phase Two would increase the searing capacity to 40,000 to accommodate major league bail, by the addition of a third seating deck. Additional Club Level searing, as well as additional luxury suites, will be included in the expansion. Sports Facilities Group responsibilities include full architectural/engineertng services for phase one and design and planning for phase two. The facility was dedicated on April 14, 1988, as scheduled. Pilot Field was recently awarded the 1988 Kansas City AIA Award for design Excellence. Chattanooga Lookouts/ Joe Engel Stadium Master Plan Chattanooga, Tennessee SPORTS FACILITIES HOK Sports Facilities Group was retained by the Chattanooga Lookouts Baseball Club to prepare a comprehensive master plan for a stadium which has over 100 years of baseball history. Joe Engel Stadium, located in the heart of Chattanooga, is the home of the Chattanooga Lookouts of the Southern League. The master plan involved reviewing architectural, structural, mechanical, and electrical systems of the existing stadium, along with analyzing the feasibility of incorporating luxury suites and a stadium club. Other proposed improvements involved upgrading the playing field, team facilides, and spectator facilities. Provided in the final document was a statement of the existing facility conditions, conceptual designs for improvements, and cost estimating for budgeting and prioritizing the proposed improvements. h +k Stanley Coveleski Regional Stadium South Bend, Indiana SPORTS FACILITIES The HOK Sports Facilities Group. with Cole Associates as Consulting Engineer, were retained by the City of South Bend to provide full architectural services for this 5,000 seat stadium in downtown South Bend, Indiana. This new facility, which was dedicated in the Fall of 1987, is the home of one of two 1988 expansion teams of the Midwest League of the National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues. Construction cost of the stadium and site improvements was S6.8 million, The stadium is primarily utilized for professional baseball but is designed for additional events including football, soccer and concerts. In addition to team and spectator facilities, the stadium includes private suites, a stadium club, team offices, and City offices. Structural features were included in the design and subsequent construction of the stadium that will readily allow for the addition of an upper seating deck. This deck will increase the seating capacity approximately fifty- to sixty- percent. Durham Baseball Stadium Durham, North Carolina SPORTS FACILITIES The i-1OK Sports Facilities Group was retained by the Durham Bulls to prepare a design study for a 10,000 seat stadium in downtown Durham, North Carolina. The study includes site analysis of two different sites, programming, schematic design, and development of the construction budget in association with a General Contractor. The design intent was to integrate the stadium into the site, and maintain some of the imagery and neighborhood ballpark feeling of the old Durham Athletic Park. h+k Hoover Multi- Purpose Stadium Hoover, Alabama SPORTS FACILITIES The HOK Sports Facilities Group, in collaboration with Gresham, Smith and Partners of Birmingham, has completed design work on this 9,500 seat stadium, located in the community of Hoover, Alabattta. The stadium is the new home for the AA Birmingham Baron Baseball Club. The site is situated in an undeveloped area which is characterized by dense timber stands and rolling topography. The design intent was to integrate the stadium into the site, and maintain, to as full an extent as possible, the natural features of the site. The Sports Facilities Group responsibilities included programming, master planning, and all phases of design of the facility. Gresham Smith & Partners were local architects responsible for coordination, construction documents, and construction administradon. Harbert Corporation, a construction management cotnpany, was retained by the City of - Hoover to execute the construction of the stadium. Construction of the stadium commenced in early spring of 1987, allowing the facility to open for the 1988 baseball season. 1 1 SPORTS FACILITIES 1 John O'Donnell Stadium HOK Sports Facilities Group has been retained by Facility Master Plan &Improvements the City of Davenport, Iowa to prepare a Davenport, Iowa comprehensive facility master plan for its historic ' stadium located on the banks of the ,Mississippi River. John O'Donnell Stadium is home of the Quad City Angels of the Midwest League. The master plan included reviews of architectural, structural, and mechanical aspects of the existing ' structure, along with study of playing field improvements, graphics, team facilities, spectator facilities, and aesthetics. The final document provided a statement of the existing facilities conditions, conceptual designs for improvements, cost estimating, and suggestions for ' phasing work for future budgeting. HOK is currently providing complete architectural ' services for remodel work as outlined in the master plan. Construction work is scheduled for completion in April of 1989. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Kane County Events Center Geneva, Illinois 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SPORTS FACILITIES As commissioned by the Kane County Forest Preserve District, HOK Spons has completed design and construction documents for a 3.000 seat Class A baseball stadium. The stadium is to bc the new home of a yet- to -be- announced Class A team. The stadium site is located on Forest Preserve property in Geneva and is one of the components of a comprehensive recreational project. Site work has been initiated on the project with rough grading for the stadium completed in the Spring of 1988. it is anticipated by Forest Preserve officials that the balance of stadium construction will bc performed in the near future. A primary objective in the development of the stadium design invoived creating a facility which could be easily expanded, both in terms of searing and spectator amenities. h°k New York Mers Baseball Club Spring Training Facility Sr. Lucie County, Florida SPORTS FACILITIES HOK Sports Facilities Group served as Consulting Architect to the New York Mets for their new spring training facility located in St. Lucie County, Honda The project wac privately developed by the Thomas White Development Company. The training facility will consist of a 6,500 seat stadium with additional bleacher seating for 700, rive practice fields, and a training building. h ° +k Boardwalk and Baseball Spring Training Facility Baseball City, Florida SPORTS FACILITIES The HOK Sports Facilities Group was selected as the Architect by Boardwalk and Baseball, Inc., a division of the HBJ Corporation, to design this Major League spring hauling facility. The complex is located in the Boardwalk and Baseball theme park in Baseball City, Florida which is near Orlando. The training facility consists of a 6,500 seat exhibition stadium, a major league practice field with 2,300 seats, four minor league pracdce fields, and eight enclosed batting tunnels. The major league administrative offices, plus the home and visiting clubhouses, are located In the stadium, while the minor league administradve offices and locker facilities are in a separate facility located near the minor league practice fields. The facility is the spring training site for the 1985 World Champion Kansas City Royals, as well as home to their Florida State League team. This complex is the first of its kind to combine a theme park with major league baseball. The facility was developed in conjunction with Boardwalk and Baseball, a "Coney Island" type theme park, with a strong emphasis on baseball, including hands -on pitching and batting tunnels, a baseball theatre, and the only satellite display from the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown. The project was phased to complete two of the practice fields by April of 1987 when the park opened, with the remainder of the facility open for spring training 1988. Ground breaking or the stadium was in July of 1987, with the fast game played February 7, 1988 on nadonal television. The Royals opened their spring season against the Houston Astros on March 4, 1988. h9k Osceola County Spring Training Facility Kissimmee, Florida SPORTS FACILITIES Osceola County Spring Training Facility, designed for the Osceola Board of County Commissioners to host the Houston Asuos Major League Baseball Spring Training and Minor League operations, includes a complex of four practice fields, an exhibition stadium, and a clubhouse building. Located on an 80•acre site in Osceola County Florida, four full practice fields are arranged to provide spring training and full squad games to occur simultaneously with observation capabilities by coaches and instructors from a central location. The Stadium is designed to meet all aspects of a major league baseball facility. The fully lighted Stadium has a capacity of 5,200 spectators providing bench and arm -chalr seating as a landscaped berm. Facilities include concession stands, toilet rooms, ticket booths, a press box with a capacity of 20 working press, 4 radio and television booths. and 2 V.I.P. luxury suites. A steel canopy partially covers the seating area to provide a greater degree of spectator comfort. When not being used by the major league team, the Stadium will be the home fleld for the Osceola Astros of the Florida State League. The 21,000 square foot clubhouse includes team lockers and showers for up to 240 players and coaches, weight training, stretching and equipment storage rooms. A second level provides the Astros with administrative offices at a central location and provides an observation deck for the entire complex. This facility doubles as a recreadonal and community service center for the County of Osceola, providing 5 lighted baseball diamonds and a clubhouse providing flexible meeting and dining spaces for up to 500 people. I Payson Field Renovation St, Petersburg, Florida 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SPORTS FACILITIES HOK Sports Facilities Group was retained for the renovation of and improvements to the Payson Field Complex in St. Petersburg, Florida. This complex is the new winter home of the St. Louis Cardinals Basoball Club, beginning in the Spring of 1988. HOK provided complete architectural services for the project. Ed Smith Spons Complex Spring Training Facility for the Chicago White Sox Chicago, Illinois 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SPORTS FACILITIES HOK Sports Facilities Group was selected as the Architect by the City of Sarasota, to design a Major League spring training complex. The trainin8 facility consists of a 7,500 seat exhibition stadium, four minor league practice fields, and eight enclosed batting tunnels. The major league administrative offices, plus the home and visiting clubhouses ars located in the stadium, while the minor league administrative offices and locker facilities are in a separate facility located near the minor league pracaee fields. Sports Facilities Group responsibilities included d esiggn though connstmcdon administration. In of addition, HOK's services included improvements to Payne Park in Sarasota, which consisted of the construction of softball fields and renovation of the existing clubhouse building to a multi- purpose recreation facility. Construction of the stadium commenced in early Summer of 1988, allowing the facility to open for the 1989 spring training season. Angels Stadium Palm Springs, California SPORTS FACILITIES The HOK Sports Facilities Group has been retained by the City of Palm Springs to prepare a master plan to analyze the benefits of a newly constructed stadium versus renovation of the existing Angel's Stadium. The City of Palm Springs, in collaboration with the California Angels, developed a program of requirements for this comparison, The current Angel's Stadium is the spring training home to the California Angels and is the permanent home of the Class A Palm Springs Angels. The master plan will include conceptual design and construction budgets for this analysis. Qualifications in Public Assembly Facility and Commercial Real Estate Analysis Ronald Barton's background includes ten years of experience in the public and private sector as an economist and planner. His knowledge of public policy issues, economic and development planning, local government capital facilities and fiscal plan- ning, and research methods provide a basis for Mr. Barton's expertise in assessing market support, evaluating financial performance, and establishing development program guidelines for both public and private real estate development. Mr. Barton's capabilities include: o Analysis of market support o Analysis of project feasibility and financial perfor- mance o Economic /fiscal impact analysis related to various special events, sports teams, sports facilities and private real estate developments o Project concept development and site analysis o Public /private financing plans o Computer analysis and modeling for research applica- tions including economic /fiscal impact models, statis- tical forecasting and financial analysis models Mr. Barton has served as the primary consultant or as project manager for the following clients: PUBLIC ASSEMBLY FACILITIES Stadiums RONALD D. BARTON Project: RFK Stadium Renovation /New Stadium Options Scope: Financial analysis for professional (NFL /MLB) sports teams and feasibility evaluation of a renovated RFK or new stadium option. Client: Washington, D.C. Armory Board Project: Rome (Italy) World Cup Stadium Scope: Market and financial feasibility for a mixed -use sports complex and commercial development. Client: Impresa Giglio /HOK Project: Cleveland Domed Stadium Scope: Market demand, financial projections and operating plan Client: Cleveland State University 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ronald D. Barton Public Assembly Facility and Commercial Real Estate Experience 2 Project: New York State Sportsplex Scope: Evaluation of operations of stadiums, arenas and racetracks in New York City metro area Client: The Sportsplex Corporation Project: Atlanta Stadium - Georgia Dome Scope: Evaluation of multiple stadium options based upon financial and economic analysis. Client: State of Georgia Project: Chicago White Sox Stadium Scope: Economic impact of major league baseball on a atten- dance assessments, stadium feasibility for suburban Chicago location. Client: Chicago White Sox Project: Aurora (Denver) Stadium Scope: Consulting with Aurora city officials regarding domed stadium development strategies Client: City of Aurora Project: Tampa Bay Baseball Stadium Scope: Market and financial analysis of major league baseball stadium with substantial non - baseball events usage Client: Tampa Baseball Group Project: San Francisco - Giants Stadium Scope: Strategic planning for facility development including attendance assessments and team valuation. Client: Mayor's Domed Stadium Task Force Project: St. Louis Stadium Scope: Market and financial analysis for a multi - purpose domed stadium. Client: City of St. Louis Project: Citrus Bowl Expansion /Future Stadium Options Scope: Economic impact and financial analysis for expanded Citrus Bowl and future stadium options. Financing plan for expanded Citrus Bowl. Client: City of Orlando Project: Dallas Stadium Scope: Economic impact of a proposed new Texas Rangers Stadium. Client: City of Dallas Project: Fort Myers Spring Training Facility Scope: Market, financial, economic impact analysis and financ- ing alternatives for a training complex on property donated by a private developer. Client: Surges Properties 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ronald D. Barton Public Assembly Facility and Commercial Real Estate Experience Project: Plant City /Cincinnati Reds Spring Training Complex Scope: Feasibility, economic impact and lease analysis. Client: Cincinnati Reds Project: Citrus County Spring Training Complex Scope: Project concept development and feasibility analysis. Client: Citrus County Baseball Commission Project: Brevard Spring Training Complex Scope: Feasibility, economic impact and financing strategies. Client: Baseball for Brevard Project: Milwaukee Brewers Spring Training Complex Scope: Financial analysis and syndication package. Client: Milwaukee Brewers Arenas 3 Project: Proposed New Boston Garden Scope: Preparation of utilization and projections of financial operations for a proposed arena to replace the existing Boston Garden Client: Boston Garden Project: Shelby County Arena (Memphis) Scope: Site, market, operational, financial and funding analyses for a proposed multi - purpose arena in Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee Client: Shelby County Project: Raleigh Major Events Center Scope: Market and financial analysis, site selection and financing strategies for a new multi - purpose arena in Raleigh, North Carolina Client: Major Events Committee Project: MECCA Arena (Milwaukee) Scope: Building recommendations, financial projections, and capital funding analysis for new or expanded MECCA Arena Client: Milwaukee Exposition and Convention Center and Arena Project: Bradley Center (Milwaukee) Scope: Market analysis and financial operating projections for proposed arena, evaluation of potential impact of Bradley Center on the market support and financial performance of the existing MECCA Client: City of Milwaukee Project: Quad Cities Thunder Arena (Davenport, Iowa) Scope: Feasibility and development consulting. Client: Quad Cities Thunder CBA Ronald D. Barton Public Assembly Facility and Commercial Real Estate Experience Project: DuPage Arena (Chicago) Scope: Market and financial analysis. Client: Chicago White Sox /DuPage County Project: Westdome Arena (Anaheim) Scope: Economic and fiscal impact analysis. Client: City of Anaheim Project: Scope: Client: St. Louis Arena Market analysis and financial analysis. City of St. Louis Project: Southwest Missouri State Arena (Springfield) Scope: Market, financial analysis and strategic planning. Client: Southwest Missouri State University Project: Timberwolves Arena (Minneapolis) Scope: Financial analysis. Client: State of Minnesota 4 Project: University of Virginia Arena Scope: Preliminary development analysis and athletic master plan. Client: University of Virginia Convention Centers /Civic Centers Project: Jacksonville Convention Center Scope: Market and financial analysis for meeting, conference and exhibit building and site evaluation Client: Jacksonville Downtown Development Authority Project: St. Petersburg Beach Convention Center Scope: Market and financial feasibility analysis Client: City of St. Petersburg Project: Georgia World Congress Center Scope: Market analysis for the support of the expansion of the Georgia World Congress Center Client: Georgia World Congress Center Project: Gatlinburg Convention Center Scope: Economic and fiscal impact of a convention class hotel. Client: Marriott Mountain View Project: Washington State Convention and Trade Center Scope: Building program and marketing operations review Client: State of Washington Ronald D. Barton Public Assembly Facility and Commercial Real Estate Experience Project: San Juan Convention Center Scope: Operations and marketing study. Client: San Juan Convention & Visitors Bureau COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE PROJECTS Project: Saint Sebastian (PUD) Scope: Residential analysis and development potential Client: Sebastian Group, Ltd./ Charles Burkett & Associates Project: Proposed Shopping Center, Venice, Florida Scope: Commercial development analysis Client: Gulfstream Land & Development Corporation 5 Project: Memphis -Cook County Convention Center Scope: Operations analysis and expansion study. Client: City of Memphis /Shelby County Project: Madison Convention Center Scope: Market analysis and project concept refinement. Client: City of Madison Project: Richmond Centre Scope: Profile of select comparable convention centers includ- ing competitive market position, utilization levels and financial performance Client: Metropolitan Richmond Convention & Visitors Bureau Project: Raleigh Civic Center Scope: Strategic and capital facilities planning regarding existing, expanded or new public assembly facilities including auditorium, arena and convocation center. Client: City of Raleigh Project: Concord Civic Center Scope: Market, site and financial analysis for a multi - purpose facility. Client: New Hampshire Civic Center Commission Project: Athens Civic Center Scope: Market, site and financial analysis and funding assessment for a multi - purpose civic center. Client: Classic City Civic Center Commission Project: Jefferson City Civic Center Scope: Market, program recommendations and financial analysis. Client: City of Jefferson City Project: Gateway Centre Scope: Economic impact analysis and community development district application Client: Nord Resources 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ronald D. Barton Public Assembly Facility and Commercial Real Estate Experience Project: Proposed Office Building Scope: Market and financial analysis Client: Glendale Federal Project: DuPont Centre Scope: Market analysis and DRI application Client: Carnegie Properties Project: Scope: Client: Commercial Property Evaluation Market and site evaluation for commercial development National Development Communities, Inc. 6 Project: Development Planning, St. Augustine Property Scope: Residential (second home) market evaluation Client: First Sun Development Corporation /Wallace, Roberts & Todd Project: Development Evaluation for a Golf /Residential Community Scope: Residential and golf course market analysis Client: Craft Farms Project: Scope: Client: Project: Orange Villa Project Scope: Evaluation of development alternatives for existing housing project Client: Orlando Housing Authority Project: Heathrow Business Center Scope: Market analysis and DRI application Client: Heathrow /Post Buckley Schuh & Jernigan Project: Scope: Client: Project: Scope: Client: Lakepointe DRI Market analysis and DRI review City of Maitland Cocoa Marina Marina market analysis Cocoa Redevelopment Agency Project: Ponce Inlet Marina Scope: Marina market and financial analysis Client: Volusia County Pascagoula Marina Marina market and financial analysis City of Pascagoula Project: Halifax Harbour Marina Scope: Marina market and financial analysis Client: City of Daytona Beach Ronald D. Barton Public Assembly Facility and Commercial Real Estate Experience Project: CBD Retail Analysis Scope: Retail survey Client: Orlando Downtown Development Board 7 Mr. Barton's involvement in various professional organizations includes membership, committee participation and /or speeches to IAAM, Stadium Managers, local sports committees including Hall of Fame Bowl Committee, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association and the American Planning Association. Mr. Barton received a Bachelor's Degree in Real Estate and Urban Economics from Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida,. and his MBA with emphasis in Economics from the University of North Florida in Jacksonville, Florida. Before joining Laventhol & Horwath, he served as Economic Planner with the City Planning Department of Jacksonville, Florida, and at the East Central Regional Planning Council in Orlando, Florida, as Economist and Chief of Research. PAUL E. LAMBERT Qualifications in Sports and Public Assembly Facility Analysis Mr. Lambert's background includes a variety of public assembly facility projects. His professional experience includes assignments in the fields of market, economic impact and financial analysis for a diverse group of public and private clients. His areas of expertise include the following: o Analysis of market support, economic impact and financial operating performance for motor speedways, arenas, stadiums and convention centers; o Analysis of project feasibility and financing for sports facilities; o Computer analysis for research applications including economic /fiscal impact and financial analysis; o Site analysis for public assembly and sports facilities; o Analysis of financial operating performance of universities' athletic departments; and o Business and operations management experience at a major multi - purpose stadium. Research projects with which Mr. Lambert has been actively involved include: o Market analysis, site analysis, prospective financial performance and economic impact analysis for proposed motor speedways in Valdosta, Georgia and Atlantic City, New Jersey; o Feasibility analysis for a new football stadium in Washington, D.C. for the Redskins and the renovation of RFK Stadium to attract a major league baseball franchise; o Market analysis, prospective financial performance and economic impact analysis for a proposed baseball stadium for the Atlanta Braves in Gwinnett County, Georgia; Mr. Paul Lambert Page 2 o Market analysis, prospective financial performance, economic impact analysis and financing methods for proposed baseball stadiums in Ft. Myers, Florida; Citrus County, Florida; and Plant City, Florida; o Feasibility study for a proposed dome stadium in Fargo, North Dakota; o Site analysis, economic impact analysis and financing methods for a new baseball stadium in Columbia, South Carolina for the Columbia Mets; o Feasibility study for the renovations of Downing Stadium in New York, New York; o Economic impact analysis for a proposed arena in Chicago to be the home site for the Chicago Bulls and Chicago Blackhawks; o Market analysis for a proposed arena in Anaheim, California; o Economic impact analysis for the E1 Paso Diablos (a minor league affiliate of the Milwaukee Brewers) of the Texas League; o Lease analysis for the City of Cleveland with regard to the Cleveland Browns and the Cleveland Indians' lease agreements with the City for the use of Cleveland Memorial Stadium; o Lease analysis for the City of Dunedin, Florida and the Toronto Blue Jays for the Blue Jays use of their spring training facility in Dunedin; o Feasibility analysis for the implementation of a collegiate football program at the University of Tampa; o Financial analysis of the National Collegiate Athletic Association's Athletic programs; o Market demand analysis, prospective financial performance and economic impact analysis for proposed Convention Centers in Broward County, Florida and Providence, Rhode Island; and o Strategic planning for a public assembly private management firm. Mr. Paul Lambert Page 3 Mr. Lambert, while employed at Veterans Stadium in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was actively involved in various stadium management functions which included: daily stadium operations, game day and concert operations, crowd control, parking operations, event promotions and advertising, stadium rental agreements with professional sports organizations, contracts with food concessionaires and novelty vendors, stadium financial reporting and accounting control procedures, and computerized ticket operations. Mr. Lambert received a Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration, specializing in accounting and math, from Bloomsburg University in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, and a Masters Degree in Sports Administration, concentrating in business and facility management, from Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Mr. Lambert was previously employed as a corporate accountant for six years with two Fortune 500 companies, responsible for financial reporting and control of five manufacturing facilities throughout the United States. Richard L. deFlon, AIA Senior Vice President HOK SPORTS FACILITIES GROUP Education University of Kansas Bachelor of Architecture, 1976 Bachelor of Environmental Design, 1975 Registration NCARB, Iowa, Maryland, Missouri. Tennessee, Georgia, Texas, Illinois, Arizona, Kansas Memberships American Institute of Architects Kansas City Chapter of the AIA Missouri Council of Architects Projects /Responsibilities As a principal of HOK Sports Facilities Group, Mr. deFlon's responsibilities are diverse. He has been involved in numerous sports facility projects as Principal in Charge, with responsibility for protect management, contract negotiation, consultant coordination, in -house project team management, and overall design review. Mr. deFlon brings his extensive experience in past projects to bear on all aspects of sports facility design. Project experience includes: • Camden Yards Dual Stadium Spots Complex, Baltimore, Maryland • Chicago White Sox Stadium, Chicago. Illinois • Florida Suncoast Dome. St. Petersburg, Florida • Adams Dorned Football Stadium Study, Atlanta, Georgia • Florida Field Expansion, University of Florida, Gainesville • Stanley Coveleski Regional Stadium, South Bend, Indiana • Comiskey Park Luxury Suite Addition, Chicago. Illinois • Osceola County Spring Training Facility for the Houston Asir's, Kissimmee, Florida • Hoover Stadium, Hoover, Alabama • Boardwalk & Baseball Spring Training Facility for the Kansas City Royals, Haines City, Florida • Sarasota Spring Training Facility for the Chicago White Sox, Sarasota, Florida • Spring Training Facility for the New York Mats, Port St. Lucie, Florida, Architectural Consultant • Truman Sports Complex/Jackson County Sports Authority, Capital Improvements Master Plan, Kansas Clttyy, Missouri • Memorial Stadium/Baltimote Orioles, Scoreboard Replacement, Baltimore, Maryland • Arrowhead Stadium/Kansas City Chiefs, Scoreboard Replacement, Turf Replacement, Stadium Modifications, Kansas City, Missouri • Royals Stadium/Kansas City Royals, Turf Replacement, Kansas City, Missouri • Los Angeles Rams Training, Facility, Anaheim, California • University of Missouri, Faurot Field Turf Replacement, Stankowski Track, Columbia, Missouri • John O'Donnell Stadium, Capital Improvements Master Plan and Subsequent Improvements, Davenport, Iowa • Florida Citrus Bowl Study, Orlando, Florida Greer Stadium Capital Improvements Master Plan and Subsequent Improvements. Nashville Sounds Baseball Club, Nashville, Tennessee Mr. Richard L. deFlon Page Two • Kane County Stadium, Geneva, Illinois • Baltimore Orioles Office Renovation, Memorial Stadium, Baltimore. Maryland • Fan -Dome Prototype Design, Chicago White Sox, Chicago, Illinois • Payson Field Renovation/City of St. Petersburg, (Spring Training Facility for the St. Louis Cardinals), St. Petersburg, Florida • St. Louis Stadium Study, St. Louts County, Missouri • Michael Jackson Victory Tour, Various Sites, Anihiteetural Consultant • Arrowhead Stadium Dome Study, Kansas City, Missouri • Madison Musldes, Expert Wimess, Madison, Wisconsin • Louisville Cardinals, Expert Witness, Louisville. Kentucky • Garden State Intemadonal Raceway Study • Heartland Park Raceway, Topeka, Kansas 1 1 Earl E. Santee Associate 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HOK SPORTS FACILITIES GROUP Education University of Kansas Bachelor of Environmental Design, 1980 Bachelor of Architecture, 1981 Registration Kansas Memberships American Institute of Architects 1 Projects /Responsibilities Mr. Santee is a Project Manager with the Sports Facilities Group. His responsibilities include design, interior architecture, cost estimating, production of contract documents, project and construction administration, feasibility studies, and master planning. Currently, Mr. Santee is serving as Project Manager for Arco Pant Stadium, a new baseball stadium for ' the Sacramento Sports Association, Sacramento, California; and a new minor league stadium for the Durham Bulls, in Durham, North Carolina. He also served in this capacity for Detroit Stadium Design Study, Detroit, Michigan. This study involved the analysis of four design options for a new stadium for 1 the Detroit Tigers. Recent project involvement by Mr. Santee includes design and t of a new 10,000 -seat baseball stadium in Hoover, Alabama; design and management of a $2,00 renovadon of Greer Stadium for the Nashville Sounds Baseball Club; design and management of a $3,000,000 renovation of John O'Donnell Baseball Stadium for the City of Davenport, Iowa; and design and management of renovations to Wrigley Field for the Chicago Cubs. Mr. Santee also served as the project architect for the new Bradley Center Arena, an 18,500 -seat basketball arena for the Milwaukee Bucks; the Denver Bronco's Penthouse Suites at Mile High Stadium in Denver, and provided design and development of drawings for the Suite Addition to the Liberty Bowl in Memphis, Tennessee. Master planning ex ence has included the following baseball stadiums: John O'Donnell Stadium in Davenport, Iowa; Greer Stadium, Nashville, Tennessee; Wrigley Field, Chicago, Illinois; Osceola County Stadium, Kissimmee, Florida; Joe Engel Stadium, Chattanooga, Tennessee Lawrence Dumont Stadium, Wichita, Kansas; Angels Stadium, Peim Springs, California; and 10,000 -sett baseball stadium for Wyoming, Michigan. YOUR PROJECT TEAM HANDS -ON EXPERIENCE AND ANALYTICAL EXPERTISE The variety of services provided by the Sports and Convention Facilities Consulting Group is made possible by the diversity of talent within our senior consulting staff. Backgrounds in public assembly facility development, management, finance, eco- nomics, public administration and planning allow L &H staff to couple real -world experience with sophisticated research and analysis techniques to provide incisive, workable solutions and rapid turnaround. More than consultants, we work in alliance with you and become involved in all aspects of your project. This personalized approach is an L &H trademark. David C. Petersen is the National Coordinator for L &H's Sports and Convention Facilities Consulting Group. Mr. Petersen's background includes diversified experi- ence in public finance, community development and real estate market analysis. After conducting the market research and designing a financing plan for Lexington Center in Lexington, Kentucky, Mr. Petersen served as Executive Director of the corporation which developed, owns and operates the complex. He received national recognition for his implementation of the development plan and subsequent financ- ing and construction of the facility. His innovative financing techniques generated over 50 percent of funds for bond debt service from non - governmental sources. SPORTS AND CONVENTION FACILITIES CONSULTING GROUP INDUSTRY TRADITION WITH PERSONALIZED ATTENTION Since its inception in 1915, Laventhol & Horwath has helped thousands of public and private sec- tor clients make important real estate decisions. L &H has more than 50 offices throughout the United States and, through its affiliation with Hor- wath & Horwath International, is represented in more than 70 coun- tries. So when you put the Sports and Convention Facilities Consulting Group to work, you get our personalized attention backed by the resources of an internationally recognized institution. For more information about how we can support you in your public assembly decisions, please contact David C. Petersen at Laventhol & Horwath, Ashley Tower, Suite 1500, 100 South Ashley Drive, Tampa, Florida 33602; (813) 228 -7555. Laventhol &Horwath Certified Public Accountants Ashley Tower, Suite 1500 100 South Ashley Drive, Tampa, Florida 33602 (813) 2287555. Ct Public Accountants LAVENTHOL & HORWATH PROVIDING FOCUS TO YOUR BUILDING AND MANAGEMENT DECISIONS What type and size of public assembly facility does your community need? How can you estimate budget needs before the project is complete? Are you targeting users that provide the most benefit to your community? How can you measure that benefit? Why are you losing business to other communities? In planning, funding, developing or managing a successful public assembly facility, answers to these questions are not just good to have, they're vital. Laventhol & Horwath's Sports and Convention Facilities Consulting Group can help you answer these questions. In response to your growing need to support public assembly development decisions with objective and accurate information, the Sports and Convention Facilities Consulting Group emphasizes planning and operations assistance for sta- diums, arenas, convention centers and convention and visitors bureaus. Our clients include governments, special operating authorities, universities, sports team owners and private developers representing projects that range in size from small community centers to large exhibition halls. Our experience, knowledge and flexibility has also enabled us to analyze special segments of the public assembly industry such as outdoor concert amphitheaters, parimutuel wagering facilities and motor speedways. PROVIDING SERVICE FROM CONCEPT THROUGH SUCCESSFUL OPERATION As part of Laventhol & Horwath, one of the nation's largest real estate advisory and accounting firms, our practice offers service before construction and during operation. Because of our familiarity with the public assembly and real estate development process, we can assist you every step of the way, from market feasibility to project implementation and operation. And since we are part of a public accounting firm, our clients are assured of a rigorous review process. Our analytical techniques and reports are subject to a review that is comparable to the firm's tax and auditing services. This relationship also allows us special insights into engagements involving bond offerings and other financing methods under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Our services are tailored to your specific needs and objectives and include: • Analysis of market demand so that your project will be consistent with the number, type and attendance of events most likely achievable at your facility. • Estimates of financial performance so that realistic budget and funding decisions can be made. Operating alternatives and their impact on your decisions can be evaluated through computer models developed by L &H staff. • Estimates of economic impact generated by your project so decisions can be evaluated on the fiscal and employment benefits to the community. In addition, impact can be used to gain community support and interest. • Identification of capital financing strategies and revenue sources for site acquisition, facility con- struction or renovation. • Evaluation of your project's potential site and design to optimize marketability, access, and utilization. • Identification of strategies and key players in the construction process so that your project is devel- oped efficiently. This service can include help in selection of architects, engineers and builders; guidance in evaluating a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) proposal and the advan- tages /disadvantages of the traditional bid process versus a fast -track design /build approach; and management of the construction process. • Facility management and operations review to help you ensure that your community receives maximum economic benefits while minimizing reliance on tax dollars. • Assessment of marketing position and identification of strategies to help your facility or community reach its optimal potential. This analysis could include an evaluation of your strengths and weaknesses so that marketing efforts can be targeted to issues most likely to put you ahead of your competition. • Master planning guidance for mixed use projects or redevelopment efforts. The most profitable and marketa- ble combinations of office, retail, hotel and other project components can be identified so that private investment is encouraged and marketability is enhanced. • Review and evaluation of con- tracts such as tenant leases, concession service contracts and proposed management or joint venture agreements to help you receive the high- est potential benefits while minimizing contractual liabil- ities, delays and operational conflicts. • Executive search to locate facility managers well versed in the most up -to -date management, finance and operations methods, making your project a potential industry leader instead of a follower. • Valuation and property appraisal to help you correctly evaluate alternative courses of action such as sale, refinancing and restructuring debt. Appraisals are conducted by L&H professionals and supervised by qualified MAIs. • Tax and auditing advice providing you the latest Tax Code changes and bottom -line implications when planning, syndicating or structuring transactions for potential public assembly projects. INDUSTRY INVOLVEMENT BETTER INFORMATION FOR BE I I ER SERVICE The key to providing such comprehensive services is having accurate and timely information at our fingertips. We annually conduct a nationwide survey of all primary convention centers offering 100,000 square feet or more of exhibit space for our Exhibition Hall Industry Report. This report measures trends in occupancy, rental rates, food and beverage spending, attendance and economic impact which enables building managers to compare their facility's performance with similar sized facilities in their region and throughout the United States. Our staff actively participates in and serves some of the industry's most influential organizations, so that we can keep our fingers on the pulse of the public assembly industry. In addition to presenting our Exhibition Hall Industry Report at the annual Convention Management Con- ference, we have co- chaired the Stadium Manager's Financial Stan- dards Committee, conducted convention income surveys for the International Association of Conven- tion and Visitors Bureaus (IACVB), and provided panelists for profes- sional conferences sponsored by such groups as the International Association of Auditorium Managers (IAAM) and International City Manager's Asso- ciation (ICMA). The Sports and Convention Facilities Consulting Group is regularly quoted and authors articles in such recognized industry periodicals as Facility Man- ager, Amusement Business and Tradeshow Week.