R-93-09-23-10E - 9/23/1993RESOLUTION NO. R 93- 09 a3
WHEREAS, the City of Round Rock has reviewed the Municipal
Water Pollution Prevention (MWPP) audit, and
WHEREAS, the U.S. EPA has setforth objectives and goals for
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) as attached, and
WHEREAS, the City Council shall implement actions necessary
to comply with the MWPP on an annual basis, Now Therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK,
TEXAS,
That the MWPP is hereby recommended for submission to the
region -VI, U.S. EPA office for their approval.
RESOLVED this 23rd day of Septembe /, 1993.
ATTEST:
KS/RESOLUTION
RS092338
NE LAND, City Secretary
CHARLES CULPEP
City of Round •o
ayor
Texas
MUNICIPAL WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION.
MWPP
ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT
REPORT
PREPARED BY
MJN I C I PAL 1 TY : city of Round R°°k STATE • Texas
NPDES PERMIT #: '17°75167
CONTACT PERSON : James R. ' Nose
TELEPHONE #
S 1 GNATUR
FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
MUNICIPAL OFFICIAL
Director of Public Works
TITLE
TELEPHONE #: (512) 218 -5555
CHIEF OPERATOR : S. Matt
NAME
(512) 218 -5584
s?‘ 0 9— 2 :513
AUTHORIZED TITLE DATE
PRESENTATIVE
EPA REGION 6
1.,I.IINL.�I v_
r 111
MARCH 1991
, tf
PART I: INFLUENT FL0W /LOA,DINGS
A. List the average monthly volumetric flows and 800 loadings received at
your facility during your 12 month MWPP reporting period.
134PP Reporting
Period
Col. 1
Average Monthly
Influent Flow
Col. 2 Col. 3
Average Monthly Maximum Daily
Influent 60D Influent DOD
Concentrations Loading
Year Month (MGO) (mg /1) (pounds per day)
92 July 2.501 184.1 3775.7
92 August 2.224 155.9 2952.4
92 September 2.357 151.6 3110.7
92 October 2.31 157.1 2853.7
92 Noverber 2.652 169 3490.6
92 Decerber 2.908 167.2 4258.1
93 January 3.153 •176.1 4861.5
93 February 3.345 177.3 4903.4
93 Narch 3.312 114.8 3106.5
93 April 2.864 164 3461.2
93 Mey 2.776 221.5 5137.5
93 June 2.97 154 3860.4
Give source of data listed above:
City of Round Rock Laboratory
1
B. List the average design flow and daily BOD loadings for your facility in
the blanks below. If you are not aware of these design quantities, refer
,to your O&M manual.
Design Criteria:
90% of the Design Criteria:
C. How many times did the monthly flow (Col. 1) to the WWTP exceed 90% of
the design flow? 7 (Circle the appropriate number)
0 -4 = 0 points; j or more = 5 points
D. How many times did the average monthly flow (Col. 1) to the WWTP exceed
the design flow? 3 (Circle the appropriate number)
0 = 0 points; 1 -2 = 5 points; 6: 10 points;
5 or more = 15 points
E. How many times did the maximum daily BOD loading (Col. 3) to the WWTP
exceed 90% of the daily design loading? 3 (Circle the appropriate
number)
0 -1 = 0 points; 2 -4 = 5 points; 5 or more = 10 points
F. How many times did the maximum daily B0D loading (Col. 3) to the WWTP
exceed the daily design loading? 1 (Circle the appropriate
number)
0 = 0 points;
3 = 30 points;
G. List each point value you circled for C through F in the blanks below and
place the total in the box.
C points = 5
D points = 10
E points = 5
F points = 10
TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 1
10 points;
= 40 points;
1 30 1
2
Average Flow Daily B0D Loading
(MGD) (Pounds per day)
3.0 5004
2.7 4503.6
2 = 20 points;
5 or more = 50 points
Enter this value on the point calculation table on the last page.
PART 2: EFFLUENT QUALITY /PLANT PERFORMANCE
A. For the permitted parameters, list the average monthly effluent concentration and maximum daily mass
loading produced by your facility during your 12 month MWPP reporting period. Disregard any columns which
are not applicable to your permit. Circle whether you are measuring ammonia nitrogen (NH or nitrate
nitrogen (NO3 -N). -
(1) Concentration
MWPP Reporting
Period
Year Month 80 D55 TSS 41111110 or Total Fecal pH Other
(mg 71) (mg /1) ,1 - Phosphorus Coliform (Lowest/
(m9 /1) (m9 /1) (Count / Highest)
100 ml)
9 July 1.96 2.3 0.0237 N/A N/A 7.2 /7.56
92 August 2 2.4 0.037 7.33/7.62
92 September 2.52 3.9 0.104 7.26/7.86
92 October 4.79 4.68 0.042 7.3 /7.78
92 November 3.88 4.28 0.134 7.34/7.88
92 December 3.13 3.5 0.16 7.28/7.66
93 January 3.49 4 0.238 7.29/7.7
93 February 2.49 4.98 0.08 7.07/7.64
93 March 2.31 3.3 0.301 7.04/7.88
93 April 2.81 3.4 0.129 7.1 /8.2
93 May 2.5 3 0.252 7.27/7.59
93 June 2.47 2.98 0.081 7.13/7.56
92
92
93
93
(2) Maximum Daily Class Loading
MWPP
Reporting
Period NH 3 - Total
800 TSS or NO -N Phosphorus
Year Month (lbs /day) (lbs /day) (lbs /day) (lbs /day) Other
92 July 40.12 " 48.62 0.482 N/A
92 August 45.22 44.82 0.683
92 September 49.36 75.19 1.993
October 87.39 85.05 0.783
November 78.49 87.99 2.781
92 December 80.4 88.67 3.869
January 101.21 113.01 8.951
February 68.98 135.6 2.276
93 243rcY 62.36 89.18 8.255
93 April 63.18 78.61 3.29
93 May 58.12 70.59 5.86
93 June 60.77 72.32 1.995
4
G. list the monthly permit limits for the facility in the blanks below. Circle whether
your permit lists
ammonia nitrogen (NH -N) or nitrate nitrogen (NO -N).
(1) Concentration (Attach additional sheets for other if necessary.)
Fecal GOD; TSS
Coliform or Total- -
(m9 1) (mg /1) N ,_pl Other Other Other
(Count/ Phosphorus Other
ml) (mg /1) (m9 /1) ....
Permit
Limits: N/A 10 15
90% of the
Permit
Limits:
Permit
9
13.5 2.7
Limits: 250 375 75
N/A
90% of the
Permit
Limits: 225 337.5 67.5
(2) Average Daily Mass Loading (Attach additional sheets for Other if necessary.)
TSS
(l /day) (lbs /day) o 3 -N Phosphorus Other Other Other Other Other
(lbs /day) (lbs /day)
5
3 N/A
C. How many months did the effluent B0D concentration (mg /l) or loading
(lbs /day) exceed 90; of permit limits?
0 (Circle the
appropriate number?
(Fp= 0 points; 2 = 10 points; 3 = 20 points;
4 = 30 points; 5 or more = 40 points
D. How many months did the effluent BOD concentration (mg /1) or loading
' (lbs /day) exceed permit limits? 0 (Circle the
appropriate number)
(0)= 0 points; 1 -2 = 5 points; 3 or more = 30 points
E. How many months did the effluent TSS concentration (mg /1) or loading
(lbs /day) exceed 90% of the permit limits? 0 (Circle the
appropriate number)
= 0 points; 2 = 10 points;- 3 = 20 points;
4 = 30 points; 5 or more = 40 points
F. How many months did the effluent TSS concentration (mg /1) or loading
(lbs /day) exceed permit limits? 0 (Circle the
appropriate number)
O = 0 points; 1 -2 = 5 points; 3 or more = 30 points
G. How many months did the effluent Ammonia- Nitrogen or Nitrate - Nitrogen
concentration (mg /1) or loading (lbs /day) exceed 90% of the permit
limits? 0 (Circle the appropriate number)
(ED= 0 points; 2 = 10 points; 3 = 20 points;
4 = 30 points; 5 or more = 40 points
H. How many months did the effluent Ammonia- Nitrogen or Nitrate - Nitrogen
concentration (mg /1) or loading (lbs /day) exceed permit limits? 0
(Circle the appropriate number)
O0 = 0 points; 1 -2 = 5 points; 3 or more = 30 points
1. How many months did the effluent fecal coliform concentration exceed the
permit limits? N/A (Circle'the appropriate number)
0 = 0 points; 1 -2 = 5 points; 3 or more = 30 points
J. How many months did the effluent Phosphorus concentration (mg /1) or
loading (lbs /day) exceed 90% of the permit limits? N/A (Circle the
appropriate number)
0 -1 = 0 points; 2 = 10 points; 3 = 20 points;
4 = 30 points; 5 or more = 40 points
6
K. flow nany months did the effluent Phosphorus concentration (mg /1) or
loading :lbs /day' exceed the pernit linits? N/A (Circle the
appropriate number)
0 = 0 points; 1 -2 = 5 points; 3 or more = 30 points
L. Is biomonitoring required by your NPDES Permit?
X Yes No
a. If yes, has the biomonitoring been done? Yes Give results:
The City has completed four (4) quarterly tests. Each test
passed on all parameters. The City nca conducts send-annual
acute testing as required by permit
M. Add the point values circled for C through K and place in the box below.
C points = 0 G points = 0
K points = 0
D points = 0 H points = 0
E points = 0 I points = 0
F points = 0 J points = 0
TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 2 I 0
Enter the total point value for Part 2 on the point calculation table on
the last page.
N. Print or type the name, title, and telephone number of the person
responsible for reporting non - compliance to State and Federal agencies:
Cary S. Matt Treatment Superintendent (512) 218 -5555
Name Title Telephone Number
PART 2: „GE OF THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
A. What year was the wastewater treatment plant constructed or last
major expansion to increase the hydraulic capacity of the plant
completed. 1980
' Current Year - (Answer to A.) = Age in years
1993 - 1980 = 13 Years
Enter Age in Part C., below.
B. Check the type of treatment facility that is employed:
Factor
2.5
X Mechanical Treatment Plant
(Trickling filter, activated
sludge, etc.)
Aerated Lagoon ` 2.0
Stabilization Pond 1.5
Other (Specify) 1.0
C. Multiply the factor listed next to the type of facility your community
employs by the age of your facility to determine the total point value
of Part 3:
TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 3 = 2.5 x 13 = ,I
(factor) (age) 1 32.5
Enter this value or 50, which ever is less, on the point calculation
table on the last page.
8
Part 4: OVERFLOWS AND BYPASSES
A. (1) List the number of times in the last year there was an overflow,
bypass, or unpermitted discharge of untreated or incompletely
treated wastewater due to heavy rain or snowmelt: 0
(Circle One) CO = 0 poir 1 = 5 points; 2 = 10 points;
3 = 15 points; 4 = 30 points; 5 or more = 50 points
(2) List the number of bypasses, overflows, or unpermitted discharges
shown in A (1) that were - within the collection system and the
number at the treatment plant.
Collection System 0 Treatment Plant 0
B. (1) List the number of times in the last year there was a bypass or
overflow of untreated or incompletely treated wastewater due to
equipment failure, either at the treatment plant or due to pumping
problems in the collection system: 9
(Circle One) 0 = 0 points; 1 = 5 •oints;
3 = 15 points; 4 = 30 points; 5 or me
2 = 10 points;
= 50 points
(2) List the number of bypasses or overflows shown in B (1) that were
within the collection system and the number at the treatment
plant.
Collection System 4 Treatment Plant 5
C. Specify whether the bypasses came from the city or village sewer system
or from contract or tributary communities /sanitary districts, etc.
City
D. Add the point values circled for A and.B and place the•t tal•in' the box
below.
TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 4 I 50
Enter this value on the point calculation table on the last page.
E. List the person responsible for reporting overflows, bypasses or
unpermitted discharges to State and Federal authorit'
Cary S. Matt Treatment superintendent (i -2) 218 -5584
Fred Russell Maintenance Manager (512) 218 -5555
Name Title Telephone Number
Describe the procedure for gathering, compiling, and reporting: /
Problem is located , damaged quantified, treatment is applied
where applicable, T.VT.C. & EPA notified via telephone,
followed by letter.
9
PART 5: ULTIMATE. DISPOSITION CF SLUDGE
A. What is the final disposition of sludge from your treatment plant?
D. Describe sludge management practices Waste activated sludge is pumped
to a pre— thickner, then to digester #1, then to a post— thickner, then
to digester #2. Digester #2 flows via a telescopic valve to the
pre — thickner. This cycle is continued repeatedly. Thickened digester
sludge is dewatered using a filter belt press then hauled to the landfill
for ultimate disposal.
C. If sludge is disposed of by land application (surface application or
shallow injection), complete the following:
N/A (1) Does your facility have access to sufficient land for: (Circle
the appropriate point total.)
N/A
3 or more years = 0 points
24 -35 months = 10 points
12 -23 months = 20 points
6 -12 months = 30 points
less than 6 months = 50 points
(2) What type of cover is on the site?
Larrlfilled
Crops consumed by animals whose products are consumed
by humans.
Crops that are directly consumed by humans.
Neither directly or indirectly consumed by humans.
No plant cover.
10
N/A •
;dentify access to the lard application site:
By the public:
By grazing animals:
Check applicable 40 CFR Part 257 requirements:
N/A (4i
Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP)
Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP)
Does your treatment plant have the capability of meeting these
sludge requirements?
Yes 0 Points
No 50 Points
Describe processes:
(5) If the plant has the capability, are the sludge requirements
identified in (4) above currently being met?
Yes 0 Points
No 50 Points
N/A
D. If the sludge is disposed of by landfilling (trenching or burial
operation), complete the following:
(1) Identify the means of disposal:
X Monofill
Combined with other municipal solid waste
Other (Specify)
1 2' Coes your facility have access to sufficient land filling sites
for:
(Circle the appropriate point total)
(0 points)
3 or more years
24 -35 months = 10 points
12 -23 months = 20 points
6 -12 months = 30 points
less than 6 months = 50 points
(3) Is the landfill registered /permitted to receive sludge?
X Yes 0 Points
No 50 Points
N/A in New Mexico, see E. below.
E. Does the sludge disposal site have an approved Ground Water Discharge
N/A Plan? (New Mexico only)
Yes 0 Points
No 50 Points
F. Does this city have an approved sludge managment plan? (Oklahoma only)
Yes 0 Points
No 50 Points
N/A
TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 5 I 0 I
Enter this total on the point calculation table on the last page.
12
PART 6: 11EW DEVELOPMENT
A. Please provide the following information for the total of all sewer line
extensions which were installed during the last year.
Design Population: 0
Design Flow: 0 MGD
Design 800 0 - mg /1
B. Has an industry (or other development) moved into the community or
expanded production in the past year, such that either flow or pollutant
loadings to the sewerage system were significantly increased (5% or
greater)? (Circle One)
No = u .oints Yes = 15 points
Describe:
List any new pollutants:
C. Is there any development (industrial, commercial, or residential)
anticipated in the next 2 -3 years, such that either flow or pollutant
loadings to the sewerage system could significantly increase?
(Circle One)
No = 0 points; Yes =
Describe: Anticipate start of two (2) significant cmntributers
in the next two years.
List any new pollutants:
D. Add together the point value circled in B and C and place the sum in the
blank below.
TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 6 I 15
Enter this value on the point calculation table on the last page.
13
PART 7: OPERATOR CERTIFICATION AND TRAINING
Provide information for your Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System
(not Public Water Supply).
A. Responsible person -in- charge of operation per shift.
SHIFT: All, Treabnent
NAME: Cary S. r4att TELEPHONE #: (512) 218 -5584
CERTIFICATION #: 465 -33 -8980 LEVEL: A
LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED: B
SHIFT: All, Collection
NAME: Fred Russell TELEPHONE #: (512) 218 -5555
CERTIFICATION #: 311 -36 -0908 LEVEL: A
LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED: XI
SHIFT:
NAME: TELEPHONE #:
CERTIFICATION #: LEVEL:
LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED:
SHIFT:
NAME: TELEPHONE #:
CERTIFICATION #: LEVEL:
LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED:
B. Please attach an organizational chart for your wastewater treatment
system, including the treatment plant operations, maintenance,
laboratory, and collection system personnel.
14
B.
Public Works Director
Utility Maintenance Manager
1 1 Util.Maint. Foreman I/I Foreman Util.Supp I Foreman
Crew Leader (4) Crew Leader (2) System Mechanic II
Utility Worker II I/I Worker II System Mechanic I
Utility Worker I I/I Worker I System Mechanic I
Utility Support Tech
Utility Support Tech
Utility Support Tech
Plant Operator I
Plant Operator I
Operator Trainee
1
Facilities Engineer
Treatment Superintendent Pretreatment Superintendent
I I
Senior Plant Operator Lab Analyst Lab /Field Tech
Plant Operator II
C. Operations, Maintenance, and Laboratory Staff. Include collection system personnel. Attach
additional sheets if necessary. .
NAME:
Crumley, In E.
Jeffery M. Bell
Olenick, Brad A.
Reid, Barth M.
White, Paul J. -
Byron D. Foster
Gregory Pate
Wm. Lee Gregory
F.C. Russell
**
TITLE:
Foreman
Senior Utility Worker
Utility Worker 1
Utility Worker 1
Senior Utility Worker
Utility Worker 1
Utility Worker
Utility Worker
Utilities Mint Mgr
If Applicable
Since last certification /renewal. (List units)
YEARS
ON CERTIFICATION /RENEWAL
STAFF LEVEL NUMBER DATE
7 yrs Class 1 463 -84 -3480 4 -11 -95 0
3 yrs Classll'268 -50 -4955 10 -14 -95 0
2 yrs Class D 467 -55 -2417 01 -13 -95 0
1 yr Class D 454 -21 -7760 01 -13 -95 0
8 yrs Class 1 573 -25 -3238 11 -06 -95 0
2'yrs - Class I 463 -92 -4479 7 -13 -95 0
3 mos 0
3 wks 0
16 yrs 311 -36 -0908 7 -19 -88 0
State requirements for recertification /renewal:
Ten hours per year '
15
STATE APPROVED
TRAINING **
UNITS:
1/
C. Operations, Maintenance, and Laboratory Staff. Include collection system personnel. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
YEARS STATE APPROVED
ON CERTIFICATION /RENEWAL TRAINING **
NAME: TITLE: STAFF LEVEL NUMBER DATE UNITS:_ _
Cary S. Matt Plant Superintendent 6 A 465 - - 8980 6/30/88 68
Michael Patton Senior Plant Operator 11 B 450 -94 -8129 1/8/91 0
Alfred Tate Operator II 9 B 455 -78 -8406 8/4/88 164
Rick Jones Operator II 8 B 480 - - 6088 10/21/92 20
Charles Spivey - Operator II 6 B 452 - 74 - 6872 8/25/92 0
Edgar Amy Operator II 9 C 449 -92 -7069 4/13/90 0
Environmental Services
Kim Lutz - Superintendent 3 B 461 - 7786 9/17/91 64
Jo -Anne Strychalski Lab Analyst 1 B 456 -88 -3805 8/31/89 20
Rick Clark Field Tech. .25 - 456 -13 -2505 - 0
* If Applicable
** Since last certification /renewal. (List units)
State requirements for recertification /renewal:
Ten hour`s per year. .
15
C. Operations, Maintenance, and Laboratory Staff. Include collection system personnel. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
YEARS STATE APPROVED
ON CERTIFICATION /RENEWAL TRAINING **
NAME: TITLE: STAFF LEVEL NUMBER DATE UNITS:_
G.L. Sapko Mechanic II 8 C 113 -34 -8130 9/24/91
Darrell Freeman Mechanic I 3 F 464 - - 4952 3/9/93
Armando Rios Mechanic I 3 D 457 - - 3478 2/9/91
Billy Jeschke Mechanic I 6 I 467 - - 6834 7/26/91
* If Applicable
** Since last certification /renewal. (List units)
State requirements for recertification /renewal:
TerChours per year. ' -
15
C. Operations, Maintenance, and Laboratory Staff. Include collection system personnel. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
YEARS STATE APPROVED
ON CERTIFICATION /RENEWAL TRAINING **
NAME: TITLE: STAFF LEVEL NUMBER DATE UNITS:_
Tracey L. Cole Utility Worker I 1.5 1 463 -55 -5917 7/13/93 40
rel;,aucd —
Joe Hill Crew leader 6.5 1 465 -15 -4478 2/20/93 20
Albert Wininger Crew leader 6 C–C 455 -19 -2709 4/11/91 40
Labaron Graham Utility Worker I 1 1 452 -97 -2088 7/13/93 –
Benard Tipple - Act. Crew Leader 1 1 - 433 -96 -2136 7/13/93 40
Richard Medrano Crew leader 8 1 467 -13 -5645 1/15/93 20
Carl Crow III Crew leader 3.5 1 464 -67 -6098 4/11/93 20
Jerry Ryan Foreman 11 0 585 -05 -3720 7/26/91 –
* If Applicable
** Since last certification /renewal. (List units)
State requirements for recertification /renewal:
Ten hours per year.
15
`taff•nn :d rtified in CA.t Manuel.
7 i PE/ T: TLE : I;C11EER OF EACH
COMMENTS:
TOTAL:
No staffing indentified in the O &M Manual.
E. Points determination for operator certification and training.
(Circle the appropriate point totals below.)
(1) Certification level for responsible person(s) in
charge:
All meet or exceed required level.
Any below required level.
(2) Training for last certification period:
All staff has required—training.
Some staff has less than required training, but
all staff with at least 1 year of service has
some training.
One or more staff with at least 1 year of service
has no training.
16
CERTIFICATION LEVEL
( If appropriate)
• 30 Points
• 0 Points
15 Point
• 30 Points
Staffino for wastewater treatment system:
Equals or exceeds level listed in O&M Manual.
No O &11 Manual.
Less than level listed in O &M Manual.
(4) Dedicated budget line item for operator
training:
Training funds are.at least 2 percent of
budget.
Training funds are less than 2 percent of
budget.
No dedicated training funds identified in the
budget.
TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 7
25
Enter this total on the point calculation table on the last page.
17
• 60 Points
• GO Points
• 0 Points
= 30 Points
PART £: FINANCIAL STATUS
All Financial Status Information should be based on your Current Fiscal Year
Budget.
List Fiscal Year Begins: Oct. 1, 1992
A. List your annual O&M costs, replacement costs (equipment replacement,
such as motors, pumps, bearings, etc., for the useful life of the
treatment facility), debt service costs, training costs, and revenue.
Annual Cost Required Actual Budget Wastewater Revenue
0 &M: $ 442,830 $ 442,830 Total: $ 2,990,291
Replacement: + S + $ Debt
Service: _ $ 1,304,576
Training: + $ 2,500 + $ 2,500
Sub Total: = $ = $ Balance: = $ 1,685,715
Debt Service: + $1,685,715 + $
Debt Service
Reserves:
+ $ —
Ends: Sept. 30, 1993
+$ —0—
Other Reserves: + c —0— + ¢ —0—
Total: _ $ _
B. Are revenues and expenditures for the wastewater utility /system posted
to or kept in accounts separate from non -sewer accounts (i.e., water
utilities, public works, etc.)?
Explain:
(Circle one)
18
No '
Are sewer expenditures ever paid for with non -sewer revenues?
;Circle one Yes
If yes, explain:
(2) Are sewer revenues ever used for non -sewer expenditures?
(Circle one) -Yes
If yes, explain:
C. Are all users or user classes charged based on the proportionate use of
the wastewater treatment works? Attach a copy of the rate schedule(s).
(Circle one) No
If not, why?
(1) What was the total billing amount for sewer user rates (do not
include connection fees and other special fees) for the last
fiscal year?
(2)
(3)
S2,928,030
No
What amount of this billing total was outstanding (i.e., not
collected) at the end of the last fiscal year?
S 41,000
What is the cumulative total of outstanding fees for the last five
years or other time period as of the end of the last fiscal year?
Specify time period: Cumulative accounts receivable — sewer only
Cumulative total: S629,854
C. Are the equipment replacement funds in a segregated account?
[Circle One' es Ho
' Equipment replacement, such as motors, pumps, bearings, etc., for the
useful life of the treatment facility.)
Equipment Replacement Fund
Beginning Date:
Balance: $
Additions: +
Disbursements: -
Ending Balance: $ Date:
Explain disbursements:
E. What financial resources do you have available to pay for your
wastewater improvement /reconstruction needs? (excluding maintenance
replacement mentioned in D above)
Adequate rates, bond funds, repair and replacement funds
Is there a capital i.provements fund in place?
(Circle one) Yes No
20
PART 9
SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION
A. Describe briefly the physical and structural conditions of the treatment
facilities: The treatment plant is in average condition. One unit
shows moderate wear on all ancillary equipment.
B. Describe the condition of the collection /conveyance system including
lift stations (i.e.aee of sewer, infiltration /inflow etc.) The majority
of the collection system is 8 -10 years of age: Consisting of lift
stations & gravity lines. The City recognizes the impact of I &I and
has a separate I &I department.
C. What sewerage system improvements does the community have under
consideration for next 10 years? A large portion of the collection system
nd -r utilized. No si•nificant expansion is expected. A plant
Sion is ex
ted in the next two (2) years.
D. (1) List the theoretical design life of the plant. 20 years
(2) List what you believe is the remaining useful life of the
wastewater treatment facilities in light of development and
maintenance /condition of the facilities: 15 years
(3) Explain basis for estimate of remaining useful life: Based
on continued improvements and contemplated expansion.
E. What problems, if any, have been experienced over the last year that
have threatened collection or treatment of wastewater? Unreliability
of plant wetwell. This wetwell has been relocated as well as
redesigned to incorporate a closed piping system.
21
F Are there commercial or industrial dischargers to your wastewater
system?
are allowed.
'Circle One'
No
Describe: Economic make -up of City consists of several technology
companies and a list of support industries.
(1) Co you have an industrial pretreatment program?
(Circle one) No
If yes, describe: Program approved by the US EPA regional administrator
(2) Have you pursued source reduction to reduce the load on your
treatment works?
(Circle one) Yes Ho
If yes, describe:
G. How are septic tank pumpings (septage) handled at the treatment plant or
land application site? k designs d manhn1P i. , it h e r rh r r
nt
b� -.
H. Have you considered development of a plan to address water conservation
and /or the reduction of organic and nitrogenous loadings to the
treatment facilities by individuals users? (i.e., use of flow reduction
devices, ban on use of garbage disposals, etc.)
(Circle one)
No
If yes, describe: The City supports a PSA arrangement to address
water conservation importance.
22
ion
Is your treated wastewater effluent reused outside the treatment
facility?
'Circle one' Yes
If yes, describe:
(1) What potential reuse alternatives are available?
Describe: Parkland irrigation.
J. Are there ongoing efforts to reduce the quantities of any chemicals
(including gases) used in the wastewater treatment system?
(Circle one) Yes No N/A
If yes, describe:
K. Has an energy audit been performed to determine the minimum amount of
energy needed for efficient operation and maintenance?
(Circle one) 4 No
If yes, describe: Report not final.
L. Is your sludge recycled for beneficial use?
(Circle one) Yes
If yes, describe beneficial use:
23
No
If yes, are the requirements of 40 CFR 257 being met?
(Circle one) Yes No
M. Do you have a program to collect hazardous household wastes directly
from individuals at the wastewater treatment plant or other location to
prevent disposal in the wastewater collection system?
iCircle one) Yes
If yes, describe:
N. Do you recover digester gas or have any other type of recycling or
special programs associated with your wastewater treatment system?
(Circle one) Yes
If yes, describe:
0. Is your community presently involved in formal planning for treatment
facility upgrading. If yes, please describe: Upgrades are planned
to the blowers & air delivery system.
P. How many times in the last year were there overflow or backups at any
point in the collection system for any reason, except clogging of the
service lateral connection?
100 times
24
Q. Does your treatment systen have a written operation and maintenance
prorrar, including e preventive maintenance program on major equipment
items and sewer collection system.
Treatment Plant: (Circle one) Yes No
If yes, describe: Manual identifies operational ranges expected. Maintenance
program identifies frequency and type of lubricant required as well as
specific location of lubrication ports.
Collection System: (Circle. one) Yes
If yes, describe: Not in written form.
Treatment Plant
Collection System
Treatment Plant
Collection System
(Circle One)
By the operator?
(Circle one)
(Circle one)
(Circle one)
(Circle one) Yes
0
25
No
R. Does this preventive maintenance program specify frequency of intervals,
types of lubrication, types of repair, and other preventive maintenance
tasks necessary for each piece of equipment or each section of sewer?
No
No
S. Are these preventive maintenance tasks, as well as equipment problems,
being recorded and filed so future maintenance problems can be assessed
properly?
No
No
T. Is an inventory of spare parts and preventive maintenance supplies
maintained (i.e., oil, grease, packing, etc.) as specified in your O &M
manual?
U. What portion of the continuing education expenses of the operator - in-
charge were paid for by the municipality? 100%
What percentage of the wastewater budget is dedicated for training?
4 1
is there : policy encouraging continu education and training for
wastewater treatment plant employees?
:Circle one)
No
Is it in writing? (Circle one) Yes llo
Explain policy:All travel, training, and fees required for certification
and renewal as well as dues to associations are paid by the City.
W. Describe any major repairs or mechanical equipment replacement that you
made in the last year and include the approximate cost for those
repairs. Do not include major treatment plant construction or upgrading
program.
Rehabilitation of several sections of collection system in conjunction
with our I &I program.
X. Any additional comments? (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
26
POINT CALCULATION TABLE
Fill in the Values from parts 1.through 7 in the columns below. Add the
numbers in the left column to determine the point total that the
wastewater system has generated for the previous year.
Actual Maximum Possible
Actual Values - Values
Part 1: Influent Flow /Loadings 30 80 Points
Part 2: Effluent Quality /Plant Performance 0 310 Points
Part 3: Age of WWTT
32.5 50 Points
Part 4: Overflows and Bypasses
50 100 Points
Part 5: Ultimate Disposition of Sludge
0 200 Points
Part 6: New Development
15 30 Points
Part 7: Operator Certification Training 25 ✓ 150 Points
TOTAL POINTS
27 -
! 152.5
g2C Points
• y a •1
s
• Resolved that the city of informs EPA Region 6
that the following actions were taken by the (governing body)
1. Reviewed the Municipal Water Pollution Prevention Environmental Audit
Report which is attached to this resolution.
2. Set forth the following actions necessary to maintain permit
requirements contained in the NPDES Permit number
a .
b.
c .
d.
ATTACHMENT 3
SAMPLE I1WPP RESOLUTION
Passed by a (majority) (unaminous) vote of the
on (date)
CLERK
a r
0921/93 11:33 ROUND ROCK PUBLIC WORKS + 512 255 6676 NO.906 PO2
DATE: September 21, 1993
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting, September 23, 1993
ITEM: 10E. Consider a resolution concerning Municipal Water
Pollution Prevention.
STAFF RESOURCE PERSON: Jim Nuse
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Municipal Water Pollution Prevention (MWPP) audit program is administered
by the U.W. EPA to promote pollution prevention by Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW).
The MWPP program includes: Preventing wastewater permit violations;
maximizing the useful lives of POTW through effective operation and maintenance,
financial management, reduced wastewater flows and reduced loadings; and ensuring
timely planning and financing for future needs and growth prior to the occurrence of
wastewater permit violations.
The City shall submit a yearly audit and resolution addressing the goals and
objectives of the MWPP.
ECONOMIC IMPACT:
There is no fee for submitting this MWPP. The submittal may help identify and
reduce future operational costs.