R-97-09-25-13R - 9/25/1997Mayor
Charles Culpepper
Mayor Pto -tern
Earl Palmer
Council Members
Robert Stlaka
Rod Morgan
Rick Stewart
Martha Chavez
Jimmy Joseph
City Manager
Robert L Bennett, Jr.
City Attorney
Stephan L. Sheers
CITY OF ROUND ROCK
April 4, 1998
Mr. Philip Rocha
Texas Community Development Program/Texas Capital Fund
Texas Department of Economic Development
P.O. Box 12728
Austin, Texas 78711
RE: TCDP Contract No. 717082
Dear Mr. Rocha:
This letter is to advise the Texas Department of Economic Development that the City of
Round Rock has completed an Environmental Assessment of its Community
Development Program/Texas Capital Fund project and has determined that the release
of funds for program activities is not an action which would significantly affect the
quality of the environment and no Environmental Impact Statement is required. This
conclusion is the result of observations by Langford Community Management Services,
Rodriguez & Huggins, Inc., and local officials. The consensus opinion of these persons
is that the construction of a new roadway and 8" waterline will significantly benefit the
Round Rock Hospital and the surrounding neighborhood, and correct an existing problem
with traffic flows in this area of the City. This project will not negatively affect existing
land use or other environmental concerns and it is not within the 100 -year floodplain.
Also, enclosed you will find the City's Request for Release of Funds and Certification
Form, a project description, the published newspaper page containing the combined
notice of the Finding of No Significant Impact and the Notice to the Public of the
Request for Release of Funds, and a Publisher's Affidavit certifying the date of
publication. In addition, the City has complied with the regulations concerning the
coordination and compliance of this project with all other Federal and State laws and
authorities as specified by 24 CFR 58.5 and has documented this compliance in its
Environmental Review File.
Charles Cul er
Mayor, City of Round Rock
Attachments
Fax: 512-218-7097
1-800-735-2959 TDD 1-800-735-2988 voice
221 East Main Street
Round Rock. Texas 78664
512 - 218 -5400
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING
THROUGH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE TEXAS
CAPITAL FUND INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM
RESOLUTION NO. R- 97- 09- 25 -13R
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK,
TEXAS, as follows:
The City Council has reviewed and hereby approves an
application for:
Award for Columbia / St. David's Health Care Systems, L.P.
2400 Round Rock Ave., Round Rock, Texas;
For Infrastructure Grant - $500,000
Administration Grant - $ 35,000
Local Match - $ 32,448
II.
The City Council has reviewed and hereby agrees to comply with
all assurances executed in connection with the application, and, if
funded, the award.
R:\ NPDOCS \RRSOLOTI \RS7K929R.WPD /e[g
The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to act on the
City's behalf in all matters pertaining to this application.
IV.
The City Council has reviewed and hereby agrees not to
participate in program income recapture and will return all program
income to the State to be placed in a statewide Revolving Loan Fund
to be used by the State to fund future economic development awards.
By agreeing to this measure, the City understands that it will be
eligible to receive as many Texas Capital Fund awards per program
year as it has eligible projects.
ATTEST:
RESOLVED this 25th day of Septembgr, 1997.
K: \MPOOCS \RESOLOTI \RS7092SK WPD /scg
Zamtb
NE LAND, City Secretary
CHARLES CULPEPER, Mayor
City of Round Rock, Texas
(For Commerce Use Only)
Complete Incomplete Application
Texas Capital Fund
Contents
(For Applicant Use)
Initial if Complete
NA if not Applicable
Presentation of Application `
I) Originals only
II) Application presented in a three -ring binder with divider tabs
III) Application /Review checklist executed by business and applicant
IV) Score sheet
Project Summaries a (Section A)
I) Form 424
II) Project Identification
III) Project Information
Employment Forms and Letters b (Section B)
p Employment Projections Form
II) Job commitment letter from business
III) Family Income/Size Certification for all retained jobs
N/A
IV) Documentation to support job retention
N/A
Applicant City of Round Rock Business Columbia /St. David's Healthcare System. L.P.
Application /Review Checklist for
Texas Capital Fund
Infrastructure & Real Estate Development Programs
The following items must be included in the application and all documents must be originals. A completed
application should be submitted in a three -ring binder with tabs identifying each section. A copy of the
completed application must also be provided to the appropriate Regional Review Committee (RRC).
If the application is found to be substantially incomplete, as noted by 13 or more missing or incomplete items
on the checklist, it will be returned without further consideration. Those applications that have fewer than 13
inadequacies will be given 10 business days to satisfy deficiencies before the evaluation process is continued.
' indicates information that should generally be prepared /submitted by the applicant & the business.
indicates information that should generally be prepared/submitted by the business.
` indicates information that should generally be prepared /submitted by the applicant.
Revised September 21, 1997
3
1997 Program Year
(For Commerce Use Only) .
Complete lncompleteApplication
Texas Capital Fund
Contents
(For Applicant Use)
Initial if Complete
NA if not Applicable
Sources and Uses and Budget Justifications a (Section C)
I) Sources and Uses Form
II) Budget Justifications (see guidelines page 10)
A. Funds for land and/or building acquisition, improvements or consideration of real
estate equity
1. Appropriate value documentation (i.e. current county tax appraisal or 3rd party
appraisal)
2. Lien Search (for equity consideration only)
N/A
N/A
3. Complete legal description
N/A
B. Engineering /Architectural Services
1. Description of services and related costs
N/A
2. Name of individual/firm who prepared the justification, date of preparation &
engineer's seal
N/A
C. Public Infrastructure
1. Quantity/size
2. Type of material
3. Labor costs to include Davis -Bacon wage rates
4. Statement for minimum improvements
5. Name of individual/firm who prepared the statement, date, and seal
6. Locations provided (sample in Guidelines)
7. Support Information for Infrastructure Projects
D. Building construction/rehabilitation
1. Size of building and specifications
N/A
2. Material costs
N/A
3. Labor costs to include Davis -Bacon wage rates where applicable
N/A
4. Architectural and/or engineering costs
N/A
5. Name of individual or firm
N/A
E. Machinery and Equipment
1. Type and description
2. Itemized price/value list for new purchases
3. Itemized market value list for existing M/E
N/A
a. Invoice if purchased less than 1 year ago
N/A
b. 3rd party value appraisal with credentials (dated less than 1 yr)
N/A
4. Lien search (for equity value consideration only)
N/A
F. Working Capital
1. Description (inventory, salaries, operational costs, etc)
N/A
Applicant
Revised September 21, 1997
City of Round Rock
Business Columbia/St. David's Healthcare System. L.P.
4
1997 Program Year
(For Commerce Use Only)
Complete Incom p late Applicatjon
Texas Capital Fund
Contents
(For Applicant Use)
Initial if Complete
NA if not Applicable
G. Other costs
1. Description
N/A
2. Itemized price list
N/A
3. Sources
N/A
H. Administration Costs
III) Project site magnification map OR site survey (if existing) n
IV) Area Map
V) Business financial commitment letter ° (Guidelines page 17)
A. Verification of Deposit
VI) Lender commitment letter
N/A
VII) Other financial commitment letter /resolution
N/A
A. Verification of Deposit
N/A
VIII) Letter from Applicant* - Provide a letter addressing the inability to fund the project
citing specific reasons
Business Plan b (Section D)
I) Business history
II) Description of product/services
III) Market (including strengths and weaknesses)
IV) Description of proposed TCF project
V) Business References
VI) Resumes (MUST include a resume for each person with 20 percent or more owner-
ship and the management team)
VII) Response to "Does your business, its owners or majority stockholders own a 20
percent interest or more in another business ?" If yes, provide their names and the
relationship with your business along with the last fiscal year end's balance sheet and
operating statement for each.
VIII) Response to "Do you buy, sell to, or use the services of any concern in which
someone in your business has a significant financial interest?" If yes, provide the
name(s) and relationship with your business along with the last fiscal year end's
balance sheet and operating statement for each.
Business Financial Information ° (Section E)
I) Last three year's financial statements
II) Last three year's tax returns unless audited financial statements provided
III) Interim financial statement within 90 days
IV) Schedule of debt to match interim financial statement
Applicant
Revised September 21, 1997
City of Round Rock
Business Columbia/St. David's Healthcare System. L.P.
5
1997 Program Year
(For Commerce Use Only)
Complete Incomplete
Texas Capital Fund
Application Contents
•
(For Applicant Use)
Initial if Complete
NA if not Applicable
V) Projections (quarterly cash flow and income statement for three years, plus
assumptions/notes
VI) Breakeven analysis if business has completed less than three full years of opera-
tions
N/A
Financial Information of owners b (Section F)
I) Authorization to Investigate Credit
N/A
II) Current Personal Financial Statement to include spouse
N/A
III) Most recent tax return
N/A
Business Structure b (Section G)
I) Corporate Resolution'
II) Corporate Charter, Articles of Incorporation and Incorporating By -laws"
III) Certificate of good standing
IV) Assumed Name Certificate (d.b.a. form)'
N/A
V) Partnership Agreement"
N/A
• whichever applicable
Applicant Representations ` (Section H)
I) Applicant Resolution (see sample)
II) Executed Certifications
A. General Certifications
B. Certification Regarding Lobbying for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative
Agreements
Public Hearings ` (Section I)
I) First Public Hearing Notice (publishers affidavit or tear sheet)
II) Second Public Notice (publishers affidavit or tear sheet)
Ill) Listing of local organizations notified of public hearings
Applicant Financials and Budget ` (Section J)
I) Community Needs Assessment Questionnaire
II) Most recent audited financial statement
III) Current fiscal operating budget
Project implementation Schedule' (Section K)
Applicant
Revised September 21, 1997
City of Round Rock
Business Columbia /St. David's Healthcare System. L.P.
6
1997 Program Year
Tor Commerce Use Only) 7
Complete Incomplete
Texas Capital Fund
Application Contents
(For Applicant Use)
Initial if Complete
NA if not Applicable
Program Income Report` (Section L)
Fair Housing Activities Report` (Section M)
Disclosure Report` (Section N)
Additional Items for Real Estate Development Program
Acquisition b (Section 0)
I) Earnest Money Contract
N/A
Shared Ownership of Real Estate ` (Section P)
I) Resolution of Co - Owner
N/A
II) Articles of Incorporation
N/A
Ill) By -Laws
N/A
Survey of Other Vacant Buildings ` (Section Q)
N/A
Applicant
We, as applicants of the Texas Capital Fund, certify that the information, exhibits, and schedules contained
herein are true and accurate statements, and represent fairly the financial condition as of the date stated
herein:
Charles Culpepper
Typed or Pnnted Name
Signature
Mayor, City of Round Rock
Local Government Title
9/25/97
Date
City of Round Rock
Business Columbia /St. David's Healthcare System. L.P
Malcolm Belisle
Typed or Printed Name
Signature
Vice President/Facilities Management Columbia
Business Title
bate
9 / 2 /q 7
Revised September 21, 1997 7 1997 Program Year
Community Need (Max 25 points) -
- Score
Unemployment Rate (Max 10 pts): Applicant's local unemployment rate is 2.3% - Score five
0
points if this figure meets or exceeds the state average of 6.4 percent. Score ten points if this figure
exceeds 7.36 percent (15 percent over the state average).
Poverty Rate (Max 10 pts): Applicant's local poverty rate is 9.05 . Score five points if this figure
0
meets or exceeds the state average of 17.8 percent. Score ten points if this figure exceeds 20.47
percent (15 percent over the state average).
Enterprise Zone (5 pts): Score five points if the project is located in an enterprise zone.
Jobs (Max 25 points)
High Wage /High Skill (Max 15 pts): Applicant's county average salary (CAS) for a high wage /high skill
job is $ 260.58 oer week. Score five points if at least 51 percent of the proposed jobs to be
15
created /retained meets the CAS. Score ten points if at least 51 percent of the proposed jobs to be
created /retained exceed the CAS by 10 percent (salary is $ 286.64 per week). Score fifteen points if
at least 51 percent of the proposed jobs to be created /retained exceed the CAS by 20 percent (salary is
$ 312.70 ).
Cost per Job (Max 10 pts): The total amount of the TCF award is $ 535.000 The total number of
10
proposed jobs is 58 . Applicant's cost per job is $9 224.00. Score ten points if the cost per job (created
and retained) is equal to or less than $10,000. Score five points if the cost per job (created and retained)
is equal to or less than $20,000.
Economic Emphasis (Max 40 points)
Exporters (10 pts): Score ten points if the benefitting business is currently exporting their products or
will begin exporting out of the United States and it's territories as a result of this project. The business
has letters of commitment/purchase orders.
0
Manufacturers /Processors (10 pts): Score ten points if the benefitting business produces a good from
a raw material or provides a tangible value -added process to a product.
0
Small Businesses (Max.15 pts): Score 15 points if the benefitting business employs 50 or less
people. Score ten points if the benefitting business employs 51 to 100 people.
0
HUBs (Max 5 pts) - A business which is 51% or more owned and operated by a native Asian- American,
Pacific- American, Black- American, Hispanic - American or American woman -
0
Leverage Ratio (Max 10 points)
Leverage Ratio (Max 10 pts): The total amount of non -TCF funds committed to this project is
$6.620.279.28. The TCF award amount, not including administration, is $500.000.00. Score ten points
10
if the amount of non -TCF funds is twice the amount of the TCF award. Score five points if the amount of
non -TCF funds is one and one -fourth the amount of the TCF award.
I TOTAL SCORE (A minimum threshold score of 25 points is required)
1 35 I
City of Round Rock
Applicant
Revised September 22, 1997
Texas Capital Fund
Project Score
8
Columbia /St. David's Healthcare System, L.P.
Business
1997 Program Year
APPLICATION FOR TCDP ASSISTANCE (SF424) PART I OMB Approval No. 0348 -004J
1. TYPE OF SUBMISSION
Application 10 Pre - application ❑
• Construction ❑ Construction
❑ Non - Construction ❑ Non - Construction
5. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Legal Name: City of Round Rock
Address (city, county, state and zip code)
City of Round Rock
221 East Main Street
Round Rock, Texas 78664
Williamson County
6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN):
74- 6017485
8. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
III New ❑ Continuation ❑ Revision
If Revision, enter appropriate letter(s) in box(es). ❑ ❑
A Increase Award B Decrease Award
C Increase Duration D Decrease Duration
E Other:
11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT:
Road and Water Improvements
12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT:
Area around the Round Rock Hospital
14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: a. Applicant
15. ESTIMATED FUNDING:
a. Federal
$ .00
b. Applicant $ 32,448.00
c. State $ 535,000.00
d. Local $6,587,831.28
e. Other
$ .00
f. Program Income $ .00
G. TOTAL $7,155279.28
a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative
Charles Culpepper
2. DATE SUBMITTED
9/29/97
3. DATE REC'D BY STATE
Applicant Identifier
State Identifier
4. DATE REC'D BY FED AGENCY Federal Identifier
Organizational Unit: City of Round Rock
Name and telephone number of person to be contacted on
matters involving this application
Langford Community Management Services
512/452 -0432
7. TYPE OF APPLICANT:
Municipal ❑ County
9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY:
Texas Department of Commerce
10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE
NUMBER
14 - 228
TITLE: Texas Community Development Program
11a. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (check all that apply)
Infrastructure MI Real Estate Development ❑
13. PROPOSED PROJECT:
Start Date
Ending Date
b. Project
12/1/97
b. Title
Mayor
d. Signature of Authorized Representative
11/31/00
16. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER
12372 PROCESS?
a. • YES THIS PRE - APPLICATION /APPLICATION WAS MADE AVAIL-
ABLE TO THE STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR
REVIEW ON (date) 9/29 /97(CAPCO1
b. ❑ NO ❑ PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E.O. 12372 OR
❑ PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED FOR STATE REVIEW
17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT?
❑ YES (If yes, attach an explanation) I NO
18. To the best of my knowledge and belie all data in this application/pre-application are true and correct. The document has
been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the applicant will comply with the Assurances and Certifications
included in the procedures section of the TCDP application guide if the assistance is awarded.
a Phone Number
512/218 -5400
e. Date signed
9/25/97
Revised September 21, 1997
Texas Capital Fund
Project Identification
1. Applicant Information
Name City of Round Rock
Street/P.O. Box 221 East Main Street
City /Zip Round Rock. TX 78664
County Williamson
Chief Elected Official Charles Culpepper
Contact
Title
Phone
Fax
Joe Vining
Director of Planning
512/218 -5400
512/218 -7097
2. Business Information
Name Columbia /St. David's Healthcare System, L.P.
Street/P.O. Box P.O. Box 1788
City /Zip Austin. TX 78767 -1788
County Columbia - Travis. RR Hospital - Williamson
Authorized Official Malcolm Belisle
Contact Same
Title Vice President/Facilities Management
Phone 512/482 -4176
Fax 512/482 -4126
3. Consultant Information
Name
Street/P.O. Box
Phone
Judy Langford -Knox
P.O. Box 14571
512/452 -0432
Company Langford Community Management Svcs.
City /Zip Austin. Texas 78761
Fax 512/452 -5380
4. Legislative Notification Information
U.S. Representative Lamar Smith
State Senator Jeff Wentworth
State Senator Jim Turner
State Representative ' Mike Krusee
State Representative
District #'s
21
25
5
52
5. Business Information a. Business Description: Full medical services Community Hospital
b. Industry (check one)
_ Aerospace Industry
Agriculture Products/Crops
Chemical/Allied Products
_ Distribution, Warehouses
_ Electronics /Computers
_ Energy,Altemative Fuels
Entertainment
Other
_ Environmental
Food, Restaurants
_ Clothing, Textiles
Industrial
_ Management
Manufacturing
Medical
_ Petroleum /Refining
Publishing
Recycling
_ Retail
Service
Telecommunications
_ Transportation
10
1997 Program Year
PROJECT INFORMATION
Fill in the blanks and provide extra sheets where necessary.
1. Will the assistance requested have any negative impact(s) or effect(s) on the environment?
Yes _ No X Provide a brief description of potential environmental problems, if any.
Note: All applicants and businesses funded by the TCF will have to comply with federal
regulations regarding environmental clearance prior to spending TCF funds, as outlined on
the Sources and Uses of Funds form. See requirements and exceptions under environmen-
tal review in the program guidelines.
2. Will the assistance requested cause the displacement of individuals, families, businesses, or farms?
Yes _ No X Number of: Individuals:
Families:
Businesses:
Farms:
3. Are you or your business involved in any pending lawsuits? Yes_ No X If yes, provide an explanation.
4. Has the business or principal(s) included in this project ever been involved in bankruptcy or insolvency
proceedings?
Note: Generally, business and /or principal bankruptcy disqualifies a project; on a case by case
basis extenuating circumstances will be evaluated. Provide an explanation and a
description of the current legal status.
5. Please provide a detailed explanation regarding applicant's efforts to access other funding sources, prior
to making an application for TCDP funds? Indicate the sources, dates, contact persons and results. If no
other funding sources were considered/contacted please explain. Some of the possible sources are: Local
(city /county) Funds; EDA; FmHA; Texas Water Development Board; Texas Department of Transportation;
Economic Development Sales Tax; and others.
The project is eligible for application through the EDA, but does not meet the new priority system a set forth
by EDA. Farmer's Home does not fund these types of projects, nor does the Texas Water Development
Board. The proposed road construction is not a TDOT road. The Texas Capital Fund is the only source
of potential funding for this project.
6. Has the business previously received assistance from the Community Development Block Grant program
(in this state or any other state)? Yes _ No X If yes, provide an explanation to include when, where,
amount, purpose/use of funds, and contact information.
7. Is the business Historically Underutilized Business certified? Yes_ NoX If yes, provide current
certification.
Revlaed September 21, 1997
Chapter 7 Yes _ No X Date
Chapter 11 Yes _ No X Date
Chapter 13 Yes _ No X Date
Other Yes _ No X Date
1 1 1997 Program Year
8. Does this project currently export products or will it begin exporting out of the United States and its
territories because of this project? Yes_ No X If yes, commitment letter(s) and/or purchase
order(s) must be provided. Letters of interest and/or intent are not acceptable.
9. Is there sufficient other infrastructure (except as requested in this application) to support this project?
YesX No
10. Discuss any existing or proposed financial incentives (ie. tax abatement) being provided /offered by local
government to the business.
The City has offered the business tax abatement for the expansion of their building.
Revised September 22. 1997
12 1997 Program Year
City of Round Rock Columbia /St. David's Healthcare System. L.P.
Applicant Name Business Name
BUSINESS INFORMATION: Date: 9/18/97
1. Current annual payroll (excluding principals) $ 9.809.464 2. Number of current employees (excluding principals) 423
3. Percent of current employees in various job categories: 4. County Average Salary 260.58/wk
16.78 office sales 22.70 technical production 39.48 professional 6.86 managerial 14.18 other
5. Please describe the CURRENT positions this activity will retain ".
JOB TITLE . SKILL LEVEL # FIT # PIT WEEKLY DATE OF HIRE
WAGE
A. N/A
6. Please describe the NEW positions this activity will create *.
JOB TITLE SKILL LEVEL # FIT # PIT WEEKLY DATE OF HIRE
WAGE
A. Licensed Vocational Nurse Technical 24 628.40
B. Pharmacy Tech Technical 1 380.80
C. Radiology Tech Technical 8 616.40
D. Laboratory Tech Technical 4 642.40
E. Food Service Unskilled 8 333.20
F. Environmental Service Unskilled 2 295.60
G. Laundry Unskilled 2 304.00
H. plant Operations- Mechanic Technical 1 418.40
I. Medical Records- Clerical Clerical • 6 364.80
J. Admitbna Registration Clerical 2 366.00
7. Method of recruiting and hiring LOW -TO- MODERATE income persons: Positions are posted in local papers and internally within the company.
Job positions will be listed with the Texas Work Force Commission.
Employment Projections
Revised September 21. 1997
13
0 COLUMBIA
ST. DAVID'S
1800 San Jacnto center
98 San Jacinto Blvd. 78701 (Location(
P.O. Box 1788 78767 -1788 (Mail)
Austin, Texas
(512) 708 -9700
September 21, 1997
The Honorable Charles Culpepper
Mayor, City of Round Rock
221 E. Main Street
Round Rock, Texas 78664
Dear Mayor Culpepper:
This is to confirm that our business will expand its facilities in the City of Round Rock, Texas,
based upon the City providing us additional access by way of a new roadway to the north of our
existing facility. It is our understanding that the City will apply for a Texas Capital Fund award
from the Texas Department of Commerce. As this is the City's only current option for
providing us with the needed roadway, we may not be able to proceed with this project unless
the funds are awarded. If we receive this assistance, we will create the following jobs:
Of the above, 51% or more of all of the jobs created will be filled by low and moderate income
persons defined by HUD for the County of Williamson. In addition, our business is an equal
opportunity employer. We have included within our hiring plan the practice of notifying the
local Texas Employment Commission office to obtain referrals of unemployed applicants.
Please feel free to contact me if you need further information.
Sincqr
alcolm Belisle
Vice President, Corporate Services
24 Licensed Vocational Nurses
1 Pharmacy Tech
8 Radiology Techs
4 Laboratory Techs
8 Food Service Workers
2 Environmental Services Workers
2 Laundry Workers
1 Plant Operations - Mechanic
6 Medical Records Clerks
2 Admitting Registration Clerks
58 TOTAL
Infrastructure & /or Real Estate Program
Sources and Uses of Funds
ACTIVITY
Columbia /St. David's Healthcare System. L.P. City of Round Rock
Name of Assisted Business
Applicant Name
TCF Private /Corporate Private Lender's Other Sources TOTAL
Injection Injection Injection Injection
1. Real Estate:
Acquisition
Equity
2. Engineering
3. Infrastructure $500,000.00
4. Bldg. Const.
5. Mach. & Equip.
Acquisition
Equity
6. Working Capital
7. Other
Sub -Total
8. Administration
TOTAL
$$
$ 35,000.00
$535,000.00
Source
Columbia
$$
$6,587,831.28
$6,587,831.28
Source
$$
Source
City
$$
$32,448.00
$32,448.00
$$
$532,448.00
$6,587,831.28
$35,000.00
$7,155,279.28
Revised September 22, 1997
19
ACTIVITY
A
LABOR
OR
UNIT PRICE
B
MATERIALS
OR NO.
OF LIMITS
C
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION
COSTS
D
ACQUISITION
E
ENGINEERING/
ARCHITECTURAL
COSTS
F
TOTAL
ACTIVITY
COSTS
G
ANNUAL
PROJECTED
O &M COSTS
PREP ROW
$ 1,000.00
22 STA
$ 22,000.00
EXCAVATION (RDWY)
$ 8.00
7300 CY
$ 58,400.00
FUR AND PLAC TOPSOIL
$ 3.00
5100 SY
$ 15,300.00
CELL FIB SEED
$ 2.00
5100 SY
$ 10,200.00
FLEX BASE
$ 12.00
7845 TON
$ 94,140.00
ASPH MAIL (MC30 OR AE -P)
$ 1.50
46900 GAL
$ 7,035.00
ASPH CONC (TY D)
$ 32.00
2065 TON
$ 66,080.00
RIPRAP (CONC)(CL B)
$ 175.00
20 CY
$ 3,500.00
RC PIPE (CL III) (24 IN)
$ 26.00
2300 LF
$ 59,800.00
INLET (CURB & GRATE)
$ 3,000.00
12 EA
$ 36,000.00
MOBILIZATION
$ 40,000.00
1 EA
$ 40,000.00
BARRICADES, SIGNS
$ 500.00
3 MO
$ 1,500.00
CONC CURB & GUTTER
$ 7.50
4600 LF
$ 34,500.00
PLYWOOD SIGNS
$ 225.00
9 EA
$ 2,025.00
REFL PAV MARKERS
$ 0.50
4560 EA
$ 2,280.00
RAIS PAV MARKERS
$ 12.00
104 EA
$ 1,248.00
ROCK FILTER DAMS
$ 10.00
20 LF
$ 200.00
TEMP SEDMT CONT FENCE
$ 8.00
2280 LF
$ 18,240.00
8 INCH WATER LINE PVC
$ 25.00
2400 LF
$ 60,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$ 532,448.00
$ 532,448.00
TOTAL PROJECT
$ 532,448.00
le
!Si')
MARK E RODRIGUEZ . /
82551 ( 0/4.,, .j
1►` Date / 2 / 7
rk E. Rodriguez, P.E. 6
CITY OF ROUND ROCK
TABLE 2 BUDGET JUSTIFICATION
*Davis — Bacon Wage Rates were used to prepare this cost estimate.
* *The proposed road and waterline are the minimum improvements necessary to serve the business.
The proposed project includes the construction of approximately 2,300 linear feet of 40 foot
roadway from face to face of curb of four inch Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement over
14 inches of density controlled Flexible Base, 4,600 linear feet of curb & gutter and
approximately 2,400 linear feet of eight inch (8 ") PVC water line. Construction will take
place at the following location:
Street
Proposed Park Valley Drive
LOCATION DESCRIPTION
From To
Wyoming Springs Drive Oakwood Boulevard
Water System Improvements
CITY OF ROUND ROCK
a, c, d, e: Indicate when the treatment facility(s) was constructed. Indicate the design flow
and /or population capacity for the existing facility before and after any proposed
improvements. Indicate the source of water for the system. Indicate the average daily and
peak time demands for the existing jurisdiction before and after any proposed expansion
relating to this project.
The City uses both groundwater and surface water. The City's surface water plant was constructed
in 1981. The City expanded the plant in 1985. The facility is rated at 18.0 million gallons per day
(MGD). The estimated equivalent population capacity for this plant is 50,000. The City has
approximately 11 total water wells. However only 7 of the 11 wells are active. The water wells
were constructed circa 1960 to 1980. The combined "safe" pumping capacity of the wells is 3.5
MGD. The estimated equivalent population capacity for the wells is 10,000. The City has
numerous storage facilities. The original tanks were installed circa 1940. Many of the tanks were
constructed circa 1970 and 1980. There are 8 ground storage tanks with an estimated capacity
of 8 million gallons (MG), 6 standpipes with an estimated capacity of 3.75 MG and 3 elevated tanks
with an estimated capacity of 1.8 MG.
b. If reconstruction or replacement of lines is involved, indicate when the existing line (s)
were installed, the diameter(s) of the existing line(s), the material type of the existing lines,
and the previous history regarding line cleaning or Ned.
N/A
f. Indicate the if any of the existing capacity/pressure improvements and any of the
proposed improvements (such as looping or gate valves) are primarily for fire protection.
Indicate if fire hydrants currently exist and if any are being proposed for this project. Does
the applicant have and adequate water supply, adequate water pressure, and an adequate
number of fire hydrants to fight local fires?
The purpose of the water line is to provide a second source of water to the hospital. Currently, the
hospital is served off of the front of the building along 620. Fire hydrants are in place for the
hospital. The City has the capacity and the pressure to serve the expansion of the hospital.
g. Indicate if acquisition of real property (including easements and rights -of -way) is needed
for this project.
The rights -of -way necessary to complete this project are being donated by the landowners.
h. Indicate if there are any special assessments, including service connection costs and
fees involved relating to this project.
No.
Public Road Improvements
a. Indicate the date of the original construction or subsequent improvements.
N /A. New road construction.
b. Indicate the classification of the road (for example, arterial, collector).
Collector.
c. Describe the surface materials, base materials and widths of the existing road
and after the proposed improvements.
No roadway presently exists. The proposed roadway section includes four inches of
Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement over 14 inches of density controlled Flexible
Base. The proposed width of roadway is 40 feet from face to face of curb.
d. Indicate the current load limit for the road and load limit after the proposed
improvements.
No roadway presently exists. The proposed improvements will be designed using HS20
AASHTO Design Vehicle requirements (equivalent to a truck with two 24 kip axle loads
four feet apart). This will provide the legal load limit allowed by the State of Texas.
e. Indicate the maintenance schedule (including who provides the maintenance)
for the road.
The City of Round Rock will provide maintenance on the proposed facility. Repairs will
be made on an as- needed basis.
f. Indicate if any acquisition of real property (including easements and rights -of-
way) is needed for this project.
Rights -of -way are being donated by surrounding land owners.
g. Indicate if there are any special assessments involved relating to this project
No.
h. If new construction is proposed, what are the development patterns in the
area?
Light commercial and single family residential.
I. If an upgrade of surface quality is proposed, was poor drainage a contributing
factor in the lack of serviceability of the street/road?
N/A
6917187 COLUMBIA/11CA MuExam Capmodm
510,000 Owns On Wpkh10 S4I $.nant LW
R OUND R007t HOSPITAL
A0057 • ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL
Item P Ilan Owatptlon Clan Vendor
7092,0
600162
B OOMS
B00511
708183
800810
800712
900141
800616
087884
800513
080700
301101
700043
000509
800802
707000
70435
800498
800263
113902
575770
800146
026800
076008
430010
060063
000032
O 00153
800801
000282
000142
000416
000000
800097
800166
800106
80003E
STERILIZER STERRAD 100 30'W X
STERILIZER, STEAM 24X367060
ITERIUZER, STEAM 240.504193
KITCHEN EQUIPMENT
CASH REGISTER
SERVING LINE & DUES ROOM
SERVING UNE EQUIPMENT FOR
CENTRAL MONITORING (VISA STATION)
WASHER/EXTRACTOR MILNOR
DRAPERIES, CUBICLE
WALK-4N REFRIGERATOR
CRYOSTAT AMES TISSUE TEK
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT - HOSPITAL
ENG11035R50 SYTSTEMS TO INCLUDE
SHELVING/LOCKER
SHELVING. MOBILE HIGH DENEITY
TABLE. SURGICAL 30152P -
PROCESSOR. MAA1M0
OENSROMETER, BONE
MAMMOSCOPE„ MOBILE
MATERNAUFETAL MONITOR, MODEL
1900 MM SS TANK W/100724
GYM. MULT1- STATION E70RCOE
TELEMETRY SYSTEM, MODEL 4000 -10:
CO -0XIMETER. MODEL 274 MEASURES Fly
OLYMPIC PASTEURMAT1C COMPACT W7
VENTILATOR SI RD VIP INFANT
VENTILATORS - 2418720011E
OIPAP SIT 0 COMPLETE SYSTEM
MOBILE SME.VING
ERE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM4405144EITNOR
6OMNOSTAR 4100 BASIC "RTE SO
ULTRASOUND MA0124E. 1-412000
ECHO SED - AS PER ATTAC4EQ QUOTATION
VAEG I9.AR Ds SYSTEM - 1EG341INTAL
ULSTRASOL240 PROSE ACCESSORY
ULTRASOUND . 3.512.7 9012 ACCESSoRY
ECHO EED • AS PER AITACHE3 OIJOTATlON
MO
MO
440
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
144
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
673779 16■0 MM 88 TANK W/100734 MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
800157 OLn cJNICAL INFOR44ATIOM•UPORA06, Ma
MO
MO
MO
MO
MC
MO
MO
M0
MO
MO
M0.
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
GETINQE/CASTLE, IN
STEMS/MASCO PRO
STERIS/MASCO PRO
BARING INDUSTRIES,
COMMON CENTS 00L
RARING )DUSTRIE2,
BARING INDUSTRIES.
DATABCOPE CORPO
PE(.LERIN LAUNDRY
STANDARD TE70TILS
BARING INDUSTRIES.
ALLEGIANCE LAB PR
LOCAL IN) ^' '0O
TELEHFALTH/TELERE
STORAGE SYSTEMS.
STORAGE SYSTEMS,
MVO HOSPITAL COLT
STERIS/AMSCO PRO
3M HEALTHCARE
HOtOGIC
G.6. MEDICAL SY3TE
MARGUETTFJCOROM
MAnuluE Ts/c0RpM
ARJO HOSPITAL EOU
PHARMEO GROUP
MEDICAL DATA ELEG
CHIRON DIAGNOSTIC
OLYMPIC MEDICAL
BIRD PROD, CORP,.N
PURITAN SEWER
RESPIRONICS
STORAGE SYSTEMS.
MARQUETTE/COROM
SSNSORMSOICS CDR
IIEWLETT.PACKARD
LOCAL VENDOR
L OCAL VENDOR
H EY- LITT- PACKARD
HEWLETT- PACKARO
LOCAL VENDOR
P708 1
do Sao
040 1 -1247 596.000.00
040 1 -1247 560,25765
040 1_1247 903.03500
070 1 -1368 560,11200
070 1 -1361 315640.00
070 1 -1361 5174.66600
070 1 -1644 815790.00
090 1 -14111 1 370,552,50
100 1 -1307 1 515500.00
100 '1 -1366 • 5 220,000 .00
110 1 -12117 1 514600.00
110 1_12121 517.06290
130 1 -1372 100,000.00
130 1 -1372 5798.000 .00
140 1 -1500 1 519235.00
160 1 -1635 1 524,00650
160 3 -8211 1 313,10.0.06
100 3-3039 1 629,524.857
190 1 -1108 1 510,112.00
190 1 -1112 1 565000.00
190 1 -1113 2 320.000,00
190 1 -1115 9 512410.00
100 1 -1132 4 634000.00
210 1 -1080 1 313126.09
210 1_1583 1 524,00000
210 1 -1685 513,500.00
240 1 -1417 1 310.750.00
240 1 -1419 1 915,790.00
240 1 -1423 2 520327.90
240 1 -1423 4 035.002.00
340 1 -1425 2 620,000.00
240 1 -1429 1 811,777.60
240 1 -1423 3 684.603.00
240 1 -1420 1 3512,490.00
340 1 -142? 1 6161.330.00
240 1 -143? 1 848,000.00
603 1-1490 1 136,00005
240 1 -1427 1 825,000.00
240 1 -1427 1 815000.00
240 1 -1425 1 836,00000
517/97 COLUM8V.MCA HealNVle Cote n860n
310,000 11na On Wonting Equipment UN
ROUND ROCK 14011PITAL
A0027 - ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL
Ilan 8 Ibm Draelpeml peen
800037 VASCULAR Do SYSTEM • MEGASENTAL
500166 ULTRARSSOUNO PROSE - A0CESRORY
5001 ULTRASOUND - 3,52.7 ASPIC ACCESSORY
500461 ULTRASOUND 53600
440483 PULMONARY RINCTION 8YS 2182/EPSON
200472 OPTION: METABOLIC MOD n E
600474 OPTIOPE STRESS OPTION FOR
337106 MICROSCOPE • ZIEES 1N/FULLY MOTORIZED
707060 TABLE. SURGICAL' 1086SP -
900166 LASER. PARAGON SON 002
300168 RH MEDICAL MINI-DRIVER II AIR
300367 ANEST}ESIA MACHINES
600356 AIMEET GEIA MACHINE
500466 LAPARASCOPIC INSTRUMENTS
000071 REIM/*JFACTURED 15X18706 VAG
320303 SURGICAL UGHT, PRC5001, CEILING
seen 9UROICAL 210.177, PR00001, CEILING
328033 SURGICAL LIGHT, PRC5501, CEILING
000152 UROVIEW UROLOGICAL SYB
800281 INSTRUMENT SET CONTAINER
500792 SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS
326003 SURGICAL LIGHT, PRC5501. CEILING
704207 MCDRAD MARX V PLUS POWER
800470 C.T. SCANNER
447052 PROCESSOR.U75 W /STAID L 8 GAL
504800 CT LASERCAVERA FIXED SITE CAT NO
000031 3100 OM ITRAK MRI (PAS) p t en1
001304 EXCEL 210 KIRI COMPATIBLE HIES SYS
817002 54111 OPTION: REMOTE DISPLAY CONSOLE F
677003 MR1 OPTION: ADornONAL PATIENT
706257 MAD MARK V PLUS POWER
600172 MRI -1.3 RES- BIBBED - BUDGET COST
447125 PROCESSOR KODAK X-OMAT 8000 RA
0000¢5 NUCLEAR MEOIGINE SYE'TEM WITH COePUT
800477 ULTRASOUND
0000117 RAO. ROOM, SILHOUETTE 90HF,
5!1535 REP: MVP /p 0514 MONITROL 16 TABLE P
1300478 RADIOLOGY, TOMO LIKE
447002 PROCESSOR -M7S W/STANC 6 6 GAL.
504450 CT L •- °- -•••CM FIXED ST7E CAT P40
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MC
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MC
MO
MO
MS
MO
Vender
LOCAL VENDOR
HEWLETT-PACKARD
Hf PACXARD
HEWLETT-PACKARD
SENSORMEDICE COR
SENSORMEDICS COSI
S!NSORMEDICS COR
Cad Zel5.
STERIS/AMSCO PRO
S1IARPIJW LASERS I
3M HEALTHCARE
OHMEDA
OHMEDA
KARL STORZ END06
STERIS/AMSCO PRO
ALM SURGICAL BOLA
ALM eUR01CAL SOUl
ALA SURGICAL E4.11
GEC MEDICAL SYSTE
JOHNSON6JOHN80
CIRCON- ACMI
ALM SURGICAL SOLO
C.G. AtioDICAL CYSTS
G.E. MEDICAL SYSTE
RADIOLOGY SPECIAL
G.E MEDICAL SYSTE
W VIVO RESEARCH IN
GHMEDA
G.E. MEDICAL SYSTE
G.E. MEDICAL SYSTE
G.E. MEDICAL SYSTE
G.E MEDICAL SYSTE
G.E. MEDIC •
0.E. NCDICAL EYSTE
D.E. MEDICAL SYSTE
G.E. MEDICAL SYNTH
0.E. MEDICAL EYE7E
G.E MEDICAL. SYSTE
RADIOLOGY SPECIAL
0.E. MEDICAL WASTE
Per 2
0.48 !Imam ON . Com
240 1 -1426 3213,00003
240 1 -14$5 1 3YLCOROC
240 1 - 1435 1 Si 4,000.0E
240 1-142E 1 3227.000.0E
240 1 -1423 1 121,076450
ZIA 1 -1425 1 310.400.00
240 1 -1425 1 310,040.0C
250 1 -1214 2 14,200.00
200 1 - 1214 2 326.024.8E
260 1 -1214 . 2 $75000.04
280 1 -1214 2 310.303.37
260 1 1 1108,292.60
250 1 -1214 1 $37,545,17
250 1 -1214 1 310400.00
250 1 -123A 1 321,434.59
210 1 -1241 1 315440,00
260 1 -1242 1 310,440.00
250 1 -1243 1 315,44040
250 1 -1263 1 3250,000.00
200 1 - 1283 1 336.00553
260 1 -124 1 316338.00
250 1 -1234 1 $10,440.00
250 1 -12105 1 323.54117
230 1 -12106 1 5588,000.41
280 1 -12111 1 $14,630.56
200 1 -12111 1 333.320.00
260 1 -12112 1 327,703.75
260 1 -12112 1 $16.407.60
280 1 -13112 1 $147.900.60
260 1 -12112 1 834,300.00
280 1 -12112 1 523,044.37
260 1 -12112 1 5375,000.00
253 1 -1407 1 328,70260
280 1 -1446 1 3277.00000
250 1 -1455 1 11175,000.00
250 1 -1457 1 801013.00
250 1 -1457 1 1144,311.00
260 1 -1467 1 3122,300.00
260 1 -1465 1 31637066
0102 11446 1 503,350.001
W17R17 COLUMBIAMC A NO Imes• Cowman
510.00011686 On WOtlbq Equipment LLt
ROUNO ROOK 1.106PITAL
A00B7 -ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL
own • non osearipion
800470 X-RAY MOTORIZED VIEWER
001700 REP DIGITAL: AOVANTX MP MO GEM RFX 0
000067 RAG. ROOM, SILHOUETTE aos.
0883057 ApVANTX OPTION NONTILT VERTICAL DUCK
600406 OFELVING, M080.E
441001 PROCESSOR M0. W40 DAL TANK.
000067 RAC. ROOM. SILHOUETTE 2044?,
86663 ADVANTX OPTION NONTILT VERTICAL BUCK
1'o2 Vendor
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
C3.G. MEDICAL SYSTE
O.E. MEDICAL EMOTE
D.G MEOIOAL 6YSTE
(i6 MEDICAL WRITE
STORAGE SYSTEMS,
RADIOLOGY GPEO1AL
G.O. M SIC. L SYSTE
GE. MEDICAL OYSTE
05$ Oars
700 1 -1400
760 t -silt
800 1 -1460
280 1 -1467
260 1 -1401
200 1-7448
260 1 -1600
200 1 -1606
DY
8 68 , 3
Cant
$28,700.00
1670.381.!0
000,01600 ✓
1 111,364.00
1 041,040.30
120,824.88
1 5$2,01 [�
1 *11.00.00
LANGFORD
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Serving Texas Cities and Counties
Judy Langford -Knox. President
Billy D. Langford, Vice President
Margaret J. Hardin, Secretary /Treasurer
ADMINISTRATION COSTS
Infrastructure Grant Program
City of Round Rock/Columbia /St. David's Health Care System L.P.
_Set Up Record Keeping System- $1,000.00
Environmental 2,500.00
Special Conditions fulfilled 12,500.00
Quarterly Reports 2,800.00
Job & low /mod documentation 2,450.00
Bid Letting Award 1,750.00
Const. Compliance /Davis Bacon 4,200.00
Acquisition 3,500.00
Close -out Documents 800.00
Final Close -out retainage (10 %) 3.500.00
TOTAL $35,000.00
/1 /IiIA. 4CLt�tG,,t��l
J Langford -
Management O nsuttant
9'/19/97
K
' P.O. Box 14571, Austin, Texas 78761
Phone: (512) 452-0432 Fax: (512) 452 -5380
aulal
04.10.
In 0 245,11.
ROUND ROCK MEDIC,. CENTER
LOT 22
BLOCK
14 0 0515114
fax 0 141,”
PINWEIER • •
FIST... • .0•95,111
OLOA • .• 77,09,1,
0(.1 OF CURVE • B 0 .00
.400,11
LINGTI■ • 3411.211
• 5,00
PC SIAT.11 • 107.435 10.7
Pt 51,4061 • .42.03 14
R M 620
t,t • DI, 'A'
• wIES
R08nial. ■•••0 641(a PAtini.4.•
Pinual[fl • a
P.ra • .71•01.110
INCIA • 72
mom ow curn • .1. "CH`
11.0.
PC STAT. • [7017.01
PT 'rm. • 121•07.42 14
PARR VALLEY DRIVE
EXTENSION
0.1111 /I JO .0 C.
ROD___CAQUZ
.4■414. .DID .04
cco4
Mal I. GOITER
FACE TO ;ACE
- SASE
TYPICAL SECTION
PARK VALLEY DRIVE
EXTENSION
TYPICAL SECTION
3CALP r•o)
......................
1997 Capital Fund Application
C 1995 GeoSy ums Global Corp.
and Pro CD, Inc.
Populated Area
I Park
water
IIIIIIIIII Railroad
Minor Road
Secondary Road
Primary Road
Q Point of Interest
Select Street Atlas
1 04 mile
0 COLUMBIA
ST. DAVID'S
1800 San Jacinto Center
98 San Jacinto Blvd. 78701 (Location)
P.O. Box 1788 78767 -1788 (Maul
Austin, Texas
(512) 708 -9700
September 22, 1997
The Honorable Charles Culpepper
Mayor, City of Round Rock
221 East Main Street
Round Rock, Texas 78664
Dear Mayor Culpepper:
As you are aware, the Columbia St. David's Round Rock Hospital has experienced a great deal
of growth over the last several years. In order to serve the citizens of Round Rock and
surrounding communities there is a need to expand our operation. Columbia St. David's
Healthcare System, L.P. plans to expand by doubling the square footage of the hospital and
adding a birthing center to the hospital at the current site.
The total project cost, including equipment for the buildings and required infrastructure is
$7,155,279.28. The proposed financing for the project can be summarized as follows:
Partnership Cash Injection
City of Round Rock
TCF Infrastructure Award
$6,587,831.28
32,448.00
535.000.00
$7,155,279.28
Columbia St. David's Healthcare System, L.P. is contributing $6,587,831.28 cash (verification
of deposit from partnership's bank is attached) and $32,448 from the City of Round Rock in
cash. The project's feasibility, taking into consideration the unavailability of other public funds
to complete the required infrastructure is contingent upon Columbia St. David's Healthcare
System, L.P. obtaining the required infrastructure from the TCF (through an economic
development award to Round Rock, Texas). Without assistance from the TCF, we cannot
proceed with the project at this time.
Malcolm Belisle
Vice President, Corporate Services
��• OWM_1B�FiCA
One Park Plan
P.O. San 550, NkSIWilt. Tennessee 37202
Phone 05151327-9551
COLUaa♦AS Inure Page b 11atinhrw.mWrMtlnet
MEMORANDUM
TO: Deborah Ryle, CEO
Sam Maley, CFO
FROM: Sara Margraf Director
Capital Asset Management
cc: Denny Shelton
Mike Parsons
Gary Looper
Steve Bancroft
Tom Gormley
Ed Davidson
Dave Malone
David Anderson
Rosalyn Elton
Jim Childress
Mark Warren
Sherrie Doscher
Bill Mueller
Mke Francisco
Cathy Repass
Claudia Stengel
DATE: March 18, 1997
SUBJECT: PROJECT APPROVAL
Columbia/St. David's Round Rock Hospital — Major Expansion and
Renovation to Hospital and New MOB — 39,468 (Off - Balance Sheet)
Round Rock, Texas
Project #373810070
Asset Value - 522,460,794
The above project has been approved by Rick Scott and David Vandewater and the
Hospital - related portion of the project is Funded based upon the following contingencies:
1. The maximum approved for the hospital portion of the project (excluding MOB) is
522,460, 794 (mcluding construction, equipment, information/telephone systems, and
interest and overhead). Refurbished or re- deployed equipment should be used
wherever possible.
The Key Planning Unit Requirements prepared by Design, Construction, Equipment
and Engineering are attached.
David Andersen has approved the financing of the MOB with a third party developer.
The _ MOB project will be constructed and owned by HealthCare Fdti,ities
Devclupment Corporation. -
i _.
• The developer will not begin construction until the MOB is 50% p *eased.
::v:e•. ;�;.. :iColumbia, sign a ten year master lease agreement on the remaining space,
. ; . •however,; Columbia wi;1 burn og.tF",,,corss:utent once leases are signed with
. .: qua iii ed tenants: As part of this developer arrangement, Columbia will c: ntnbute
land for the MOB and in return, will receive a 40% (minimum) cash How and net
- --'profits interest. The ;Columbia Real Estate 'department will work with the
•crsveloper to finalize•the Development and Lease Agreements. •
Approval Memorandum
Page Two
March 18, 1997
3. Round Rock Hospital is operated under a 50/50 partnership between Columbia and St.
David's. As such, each partner will be responsible for 50% of the capital costs. The
partners will fund the project under the terms of the Partnership Agreement.
4. Design, Construction., Equipment and Engineering will use market -based pricing to
confirm that the approved budget for this project is adequate to complete the
approved scope. The construction will not begin on the project until this is confirmed
and final plans are completed. If an earlier start date is required because of a given
constraint (e.g., market demands, physician needs, etc.), the Group or Division may
approve the decision and assume the budgetary risk.
Based upon the attached preliminary pricing estimate, the hospital - related portion of the
project will be funded in the following manner:
Attachments: Target Budget
Key Planning Unit Requirements
Executive Management Review
TOTAL VALUE
Corporate Capital:
Construction 513,0I3,614
Equipment 7,900,000
Information.lfelephone Systems 332.822
Subtotal $21,246,436
Interest & Overhead 1 214 35/1
Total S22.460.794
Design, Construction, Equipment and Engineering will coordinate the implementation of
the construction and equipment purchases, and Ed Davidson is your contact. David
Malone will negotiate and finnli7o any development and/or lease agreements related to the
MOB. Bill Mueller will coordinate all information system and telephone system
purchases. It will be the facility's responsibility to use the Capital Projects Purchase
Order Receiving System to electronically receive all purchases on the project. The
receiving will need to be done manually if this system is not yet in place.
Subsequent invoices will be paid by the corporate office only after purchases have
been received either on the above mentioned system or manually. The dollars
estimated to be required will be managed carefully. Any and all saving will be reallocated
for other development uses, not hospital- specific preferences. Any overage resulting from
scope changes requested by the hospital will be funded by the party accountable for
requesting the
Based upon the attached Executive Management Review, we will track the incremental
EBDITA projected from this project. The proforma impact of Year One will be
incorporated into your operating budget based upon the date the project is completed.
TARGET BUDGET
TWO LEVEL ADDITION & HOSPITAL RENOVATIONS '
ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL
ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
37318000A
adeet
Construction S13,013,614
Medical Equipment S 7900.000
Subtotal $20,913,614
Land S 0
VS Phones S 332,822
lnterest/Ovethead $ 1.214.158
Total 522.460.794
Construction Daratioq 16 Months
Eanipmcnt
If All New Actual Cost Reduction h
9,784,960 7,900,000 (1,884,960) 19%
• Refurbished MRI
• Replacement of 10 year old Birthing Furniture and Equipment
• Replacement Equipment for surgery equal to the new Surgery Center equipment
• Refurbished Sterilizers
Bsildisu Area
New SF 66,520
Reno SF 22144
Total 88,620 SF
SsnISsi
• 36 New Med/Sorrg Beds; 6 ICU; 12 Post Pathan; 2 LDRP; 11 Gyn/OB; 16 New SNF Beds;
2 AMB Prep/Hold
• 1 Chest/X -ray and 3 express testing rooms
• 2 Multi testing rooms
• 1 Blood gas Alcove
• 1 new imaging room
• Level I Nursery - 8 bassinets; Level II Nursery - 6 I Isolation Room; 1 Bone
Densitometry
• 3 PIT cardio rehab positions
. MOB to be off balance sheet
• New three story expansion on front of hospital
• Third Floor -16 new SNF beds with half shell space (8,522 SF)
2/21/97
02/07/1997 19:50 9724907010
Hospital: Round Reck
Location: Round Rock, TX
Project Expansion & MOB
DALLAS D AND C
Columbia information Systems
Construction Budget Summary Estimate
Estimate Date: 2/7/97
Costa:
1.) Cabling $79,788.00
2.) Information Services Equipment $158,034.00
3.) Telephone Equipment $95,000.00
4.) 'CPCS Equipment (Meditech)
Project Total for IS/Telecommunications $332,822.00
Note: * US will be funding these cask Please do not include with Construction Budget
Descriptions
1.) Cabling
• Copper and fiber risers
• Horizontal Voice and Data Cable
• Terminal Devices- Communications equipment connections
2J4.) Information Services Equipment Meditech Charges
•.
Terminals, printers, personal computers
• Terminal Servers, LAN hardware. bridges, routers, gateways
• Software installation costs
3.) Telephone Equipment
• Switch and Station equipment
• Peripheral equipment (voice nail, call accounting. etc.)
Budget information for this project has been submitted by the following:
Information Svsteme Hardware TAIehene Eawenmant & Goblin
Bill Read
Nashville. TN
(615) 344 -8054
William Mueller
Nashvile, TN
(615) 344 -5920
PACE 05
ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL
1
KEY PLANNING UNIT
SUMMARY
1
EXISTING
NEW CAPACITY
TOTAL LICENSED BEDS
75 Licensed Beds (65 In
service)
99 Licensed Beds (99 In Service)
NURSING UNITS
56 Acute and 9 Long -term Can
83 Acute and 16 Long Term Care.
MED/SURG
34 Med/Surg (22 P; 12 SP)
38 Med/Surg (Needed in Year 3)
ICU
6 ICU
8 ICU (Existing: no renov. Or incease in
beds)
POSTPARTUM
10 Postpartum
22 Postpartum Beds
LDRJPs
6 LOR/P's
8 LDR/Ps
ANTEPARTUM/GYN/OBSERV (06)
Curren6y using PP/LDRPs
11 GyNAntepartum/Obs
SNU
9 SNF
16 SNF
Et1tiA11ENT SERVICES
OP PATIENT PREP/RECOVERY
6 Prep/Recovery iane..ey u si n g a SP teac
31P Reared
8 Amb PrepiHotd/Rec I I
EXPRESS TESTING
1 Chest/X -ray and 3 express testing
rooms (contingent on redesign of
Imaging Dept)
CARDIOPULMONARY
1 MuW- purpose Testing Room
3 Multi- purpose Testing Rooms
MULTI - PURPOSE TESTING ROOM
I Multi purpose Testing Roam
(Stress/E3>dPFT/EKGIEEG and
Blood Gas)
3 Multi purpose Testing Rooms (1
Stress EchoIHoiars w/rwo stress testing
positions: 1 EEG/EKG/Sleep large
enough to accommodate two sleep
positions (used for EEG/EKG during day
and Sleep at night): and 1 PFr Room]
9L0,00 GAS ALCOVE
1 Blood Gas Alcove
RADIOLOGY
'
1 new nodality and hnprCVament of
'sting equipment
MR1
1 MR1 (new)
OBSTETRICS (bed-related spaces)
Level I Nusery
Lawn! & II Nurseries and 1 tasting
room
LEVEL I NURSERY
16 Bassinets
4 Bassinet
LEVEL II NURSERY
6 Level 11 Beds
ISOLATION ROOM
-
1 Isolation Room
BONE DENSrTOMETRY
1 Bone Densilome(ry
VIT/CARDIO REHAB
4 Positions
9 Total Positions
GYM/FITNESS
2 Stations
Stations
HYDRO TANKS
2 Hydrotanks
2 Hydrotanks
u osviOUAL TREATMENT ROOMS
2 Individual Treatment Cubicles
Individual Treatment Cubicles
EXERCISE TABLE
1 Exercise Table
Dalian a Caumwxwr
v u
COLUMBIA ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
PROJECT SUMMARY
OVERVIEW
The scope of this project involves an increase in bed capacity from 75 licensed beds (65 in
service) to 99 licensed beds (99 in service); an increase in capacity in Labor and Delivery,
including the addition of a Level II nursery; an increase in capacity in the ambulatory staging
and secondary recovery area; an increase in capacity in Cardiopulmonary Diagnostics; the
addition of an MRI; and an increase in capacity in Physical Therapy. There is also a need to
improve equipment and patient flow which may require renovation and/or new construction and
replacement and/or upgrade of equipment. The equipment requests in this project include new
equipment as well as replacement of existing equipment
MEDICAUSURGICAL UNIT
The Med/Surg bed increase is two beds based on Year 3 needs, for a total of 36 Med/Surg
beds; However, the main objective of the Hospital Administration is to convert from the existing
private /semi - private mix to all private Med/Surg beds.
ICU (no renovation or increase in capacity)
POSTPARTUM and ANTEJGYNJOBSERVATION UNITS
The number of Postpartum be is increased by 12, for a total of 22 PP. In addition, a total of 11
Ante/Gyn/Observation beds is required.
SNU
An increase from 9 to 16 SNU beds is required.
LABOR AND DELIVERY
There is an increase in the number of LDR/P's from six to eight. The existing LDR's are
designed as LDR/P's; however, If the Labor and Delivery area is relocated entirely to new
construction, then the eight LDR's would not have to be designed as LDR/P's. If the area is
renovated with the addition of two LDR's, the additional LDR's would not have to be designed
as LDR/P's.
WOMEN/INFANTS SERVICES (non - licensed spaces)
The Obstetrics component of this project includes an addition in the number of Level I nursery
bassinets, the addition of a 6-bed Level II Nursery, and the addition of a bone densitometry unit.
The Business Case also proposes the addition of a nursery exam room and the relocation of
one of the existing two Mammography units in Radiology to the Women/Infants Services area
for screening.
The Business Case proposes a new updated fetal monitoring system.
OUTPATIENT PROCESSING
wean, Coeseueaen. Equbmard and Enahrwe's. IS7 I
COLUMBIA ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL ROUND ROCK, TEXAS
PROJECT SUMMARY
The number of ambulatory surgery and special procedures prep/hold/recovery spaces should
increase from 6 positions to 8 positions. The existing 6 positions are located in three semi-
private patient rooms.
The proposed express testing area with chest/X -ray and express testing capabilities is
contingent on the redesign/relocation of Imaging/Radiology Services. If Imaging/Radiology
Services are oriented to outpatient use and convenient access for express testing, additional
dedicated space for express testing will not be required.
CARDIOPULMONARY
The existing Cardiopulmonary Diagnostic area consists of one large multl- purpose room.
Cardiopulmonary Services should expand to include 3 Multi- purpose testing rooms and a blood
gas alcove as described in the Key Planning Unit Memo - Summary.
RADIOLOGY
This project includes the need for MRI services and equipment. An improvement in the
capabilities of the existing equipment for other modalities is also needed. At present, the
proposed pieces of new equipment include, but are not limited to, the following: a new CT
scanner, a new U/S unit, a new Nuclear Medicine unit, and new General Radiography
equipment.
PHYSICAL THERAPY
An increase in Physical Therapy capacity is required as shown in the Key Planning Unit
Summary.
SURGERY PREP /RECOVERY
The Business Case proposes to reconfigure the existing Surgery Prep/Primary Recovery area
with no increase in patient positions.
ENDOSCOPY
The Business Case proposes to relocate the Endo room, contingent on the redesign/relocation
of Imaging/Radiology Services.
SUPPORT SERVICES
The Business Case proposes the following components:
• Expansion and relocation of Laboratory
• Expansion and relocation of the main lobby, family waiting, and the admission area to the
front of a new first floor expansion
• Cafeteria expansion and the addition of a physician dining room
De thin. Conlelialan, eguiprrnd and Ea9lrraarb461177197 2
COLUMBIA ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL ROUND ROCK. TEXAS
PROJECT SUMMARY
• Expansion and relocation of the physician lounge to include both male and female changing
areas.
• Expansion of Pharmacy, Medical Records, Materials Management. Environmental services,
MIS and Sterile Processing
• The combination, expansion and reconfiguration of Administration. Accounting and Human
Resources.
MEDICAL. OFFICE BUILDING
A MOB is included in the proposed project
Design. Dennnuellon. Igglowlent and L ...Iing.1QbW 3
ANALYST:
PROJECT PRESENTED
FOR APPROVAL:
OVERVIEW:
DESCRIPTION:
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT REVIEW
February 21, 1997
Mike Francisco
WJ lu
Columbia/St. David's Round Rock Hospital — Major Expansion and Renovation
to Hospital and New MOB — 39,468 R.S.F. (Off- Balance Sheet)
Round Rock, Texas
This project includes a major expansion to the hospital with the addition of
66,250 new square feet and renovation of 22,100 square feet. The hospital now
includes approximately 67,000 total square feet. In addition, a new MOB, with
approximately 39,468 rentable square feet will be constructed adjacent to the
hospital on the hospital's campus. The MOB will be constructed and owned
by a developer, HealthCare Facilities Development Corporation (HCFD).
Columbia/St David's will contribute the land but will not incur any
capital expenditures related to the MOB. The MOB will be occupied by a
variety of specialties including family practice, obstetrics, cardiology, oncology,
internal medicine, pediatrics, urology, and general surgery.
Round Rock Hospital (RRH) is located in a high growth area approximately
15 -20 miles north of Austin. The service area population grew 5.2% annually
between 1990 and 1996 and is projected to grow 4% annually between 1996
and 2001. Although population growth in the area has been tremendous, the
hospital's admissions, surgeries, outpatient visits, and births have not kept pace
with the population growth over the past few years. Outmigration has been
high for all services due to a poor aesthetic image, inadequate space for
outpatient services, outdated technology and lack of a full range of services.
The hospital was constructed in 1983 and has not had any major renovation or
expansion since that time. With the significant growth in the arcs, the hospital
has outgrown its physical plant and cannot accommodate future growth. This
project addresses needs throuehout the facility and will position the Hospital to
take advantage of the population growth and reduce outmigration.
The nearest non- Columbia hospital in the area is approximately eight miles from
RRH. However, competitors are beginning to move into the immediate area by
establishing outpatient centers. The high population growth and attractive
demographics in the area make it desirable for competitive development.
The existing hospital is a one -story structure with approximately 67,000 total
square feet. A new three -story addition (with approximately 17,042 s.f per
floor) will be constructed on the front side of the hospital. The first floor of the
addition will include a new main entrance, family waiting area, and admission
area In addition, Administration, Accounting, and Human Resources will be
combined, expanded and reconfigured into the new space on the first floor.
The second floor of the addition will include the med/surg unit (36 beds). The
third floor of the addition will include a 16 -bed skilled nursing unit, which will
Bed Type
Existing Capacity
New Capacity
(and location)
Med/Surg Beds
34 (22 priv; 12 sp)
36 (all private)
(2 Floor)
ICU
6
6
(1' Floor)
Postpartum
10
22
(l Floor)
LDRs
6
8
(1' Floor)
Gyn/Amspartum/Observation
Currently using
LDRJP's
11
(1' Floor)
Skilled Nursing
9
16
(3" Floor)
Tcusl
65
99
be relocated and expanded from the nine -bed unit presently on the first floor.
The SNU will occupy approximately one -half of the third floor (8,522 s.f.), with
the remainder of the floor being shell space for future buildout. In addition to
the construction, a significant portion of the project cost includes replacement
or addition of medical equipment (primarily imaging equipment). Much of the
equipment in the facility was purchased in 1983 when the facility opened or was
purchased used It is important to note that as much as $5 - S6 million of
the project cost is related to the replacement of existing equipment
Increased Bed Capacity. This project will expand the hospital's overall bed
capacity from 75 licensed beds (65 in service) to 99 beds (licensed and in
service). This increase in capacity is based on the recommendation provided by
Design, Construction, Equipment, and Engineering. See Exhibit NI for the
Key Planning Units. The change in bed capacity will be as follows:
Women's Services. The L&D area will be expanded to accommodate a
separate entrance and waiting area. All existing LDRs will be refurbished and
two new LDRs will be added. Due to the projected increase in volumes and
new length of stay requirements, 12 postpartum beds and 11 gyn beds will be
added above the current capacity. These units will displace a portion of the
existing 34-bed med/surg unit. The existing nursery will be expanded from 16
to 24 bassinets and relocated. A 6- bassinet Level II nursery will be added
(Level II nursery services are not currently provided). The nurses station will
be reconfigured, and mammography (relocates! from Imaging), bone
densitometry, and education space will be added. A new updated fetal
monitoring system will be put into place.
MEdical/SurricaUSkified Nursing, The expansion of Postpartum/Gyn to 33
beds displaces all but 11 med/surg beds on the current ground floor, requiring
the need to construct a second floor to the addition. The expansion of the SNU
2
1
MOB:
from nine beds to 16 beds and conversion of eight semi- private beds to four
private beds would use the remaining 11 med/surg beds and "box in" the SNU
from any future growth. By moving the SNU to the third floor and shelling the
balance of the floor, the SNU and/or med/surg unit will have room to grow.
Leaving some excess capacity on the current ground floor also allows shifting
of beds for women's services if the future growth is needed in the surgical and
ICU areas as new surgical services are added in the future.
Outpatient Services. The current facility is not designed to accommodate
outpatient services. This project will add a quick turnaround express testing
area with draw station and simple x -ray capability near the facility entrance.
Outpatient processing will be expanded to include larger second stage waiting
and changing rooms. Radiology, Laboratory, Physical Therapy and
Cardiopulmonary will be relocated and/or expanded to facilitate higher volumes
and promote patient privacy. Cardiac Rehab, Sleep Lab, Speech Therapy, Bone
Densitometry, and MRI will be new services. Dual purpose exam rooms will be
added to the rear of the Emergency Department which can be utilized by
Outpatient Services during the day and Emergency Department in the evenings
and weekends. The waiting and triage area of the Emergency Department will
also be expanded to improve patient flow.
Support Services. The lobby, family waiting, and admission area will be
expanded and relocated to the front of the new first floor expansion. The
cafeteria will be slightly expanded, and a contiguous physician dining room will
be added. The physician lounge in Surgery will be relocated and expanded to
include male and female changing areas. Several departments, including
Pharmacy, Medical Records, Materials Management, Environmental Services,
MIS and sterile processing will be expanded.
Equinanent. As mentioned above, a large portion of the project cost is related
to the replacement or addition of equipment. This includes equipment in the
imasing areas, central processing (sterilizers), OB /nursery, OR, Recovery,
Dietary, Physical Therapy, Cardiopulmonary, Pharmacy, and Laboratory. An
�LRF (re.fv.rbia tat a -d b cne de. s:temet will be added, which will provide the
hospital with new services (proformas reflect new volumes). Major
replacement equipment includes two R.F Rooms, a CT Scanner, a laser
imaging camera, sterilizers, anesthesia machines, and nursery monitors.
As mentioned above, a new two-story medical office building will be
constructed adjacent to the hospital near the front corner of the hospital. There
is a critical need for additional office space on campus. There is currently one
hospital -owned MOB on campus with 31,500 rentable square feet, which is
fully occupied. Another MOB on campus (physician- owned), is also fully
occupied. The hospital has a very aggressive physician recruitment plan with
19 physicians expected to be added by the first year of the project and 12
additional physicians to be added over the next four years. The new MOB will
provide space needed to accommodate these physicians. Adequate land is
available for additional surface parking needed with this project
3
Q13
As mentioned above, the MOB will be constructed and owned by HCFD. This
is the same company developing the South Austin MOB project. The deal
structure of this project will be very similar to the South Austin project.
Columbia will masterlease 50% of the building, but will "bum -off' the lease as
physicians sign qualifying leases and occupy the space. Average rental rates for
existing buildings in the area are approximately S18-819 per square foot gross.
The gross rental rate for the new MOB is projected at 520.00 per square foot
with 2.5% annual rent escalations. Because the demand for office space is high,
Columbia's contingency on the space is expected to be minimal. MOB
occupancy is projected at 60% in year one, 80% in year two, and 95% in year
three and beyond. Columbia will contribute the land for the MOB. In return
for Columbia's land contribution and lease commitment, Columbia will receive
40% of the net cash flow after debt service, distributed annually.
PROJECT COST: Hospital Only (1):
Construction 513,013,614 (3146.85 avg. cost / s.f. for
Equipment 7,900,000 New and Renovated areas)
Information Systems 332,822
interest/Overhead 1.214.358
Total $22.460 794 (1)
MOB Only (2):.
Hard Costs 53,960,000
Soft Costs 372,080
Developer Fee 175,000
Financin Costs 338.555
Total 54845 635 (121.14 cast/ gross s.f.)
(1) The hospital project costs are based on the pr pricing estimate
provided by Design, Construction, Equipment, and Engineering and
Information Services. This represents the estimated capital costs to be
incurred by Coiumbia/St. David's.
(2) The MOB costs are presented for i nformatio n purp oses only. These
estimates were provided by the developer, HCFD. Columbia/St. David's
will contribute the land for the MOB but will not incur any capital
expenditures related to the MOB. Because there is no capital
commitment required by Columbia/St. David's, the project returns
presented below do not include the MOB.
JUSTIFICATION: " The justification for this project is based on market growth and protection.
Growth. The project will facilitate market share growth by expanding and
updating the facility. RRH's service area is located primarily in Williamson
County, one of the fastest growing urban counties in the country. Despite this
growth, much of RRH's volumes have not kept pace with the growth There is
4
significant outmigration in all services due to the pool aesthetic image of the
facility, inadequate space for outpatient services, outdated technology and lack
of a full range of services. Additionally, the existing primary care physicians are
operating at full capacity . The table below shows inpatient market share by
major service:
Round Rock Hospital Service Area — Market Share by Product Line:
Note: These market share percentages are based on 1994 data_ the latest official data available.
PHYSICIANS:
Protection. Competition in the Round Rock market is accelerating due to the
rapidly growing population. Scott and White has purchased 25 acres at 1431
and 1H -35 for a future hospital site. Scott and White is a major healthcare
provider in the area with a hospital in Temple, Texas (approximately 35 miles
north of Round Rock) and 18 -20 outpatient clinics in the Central Texas area.
They are also building a 10,000 square foot family practice facility
approximately two miles west of RRH. Scott and White currently operates a
satellite clinic in Round Rock with seven physicians. Additionally, they are
constructing a comprehensive outpatient facility north of C-eorgetown to serve
the "Sun City" project in thaz area. Travis Physician's Associates (TPA),
affiliated with PruCare, which works exclusively with the competition,
continues to expand in RRH's service area. A clinic was recently opened in
Cedar Park and another is proposed for Georgetown. TPA has an existing
clinic in Round Rock with approximately six primary care physicians. In
addition, several other competitors are establishing primary care offices and
other outpatient services in the area.
Volume Projections. Administration has projected incremental volumes in the
following areas: inpatient admissions, outpatient surgeries, births, and
outpatient visits (including MRI procedures). These projections are based on
capturing increased market share, physician recruitment, and new services.
Hospital Administration has an aggressive physician recruitment plan in place.
Several physicians in the Austin area have expressed an interest in relocating or
expanding their practices to the Round Rock campus. In addition, several
physicians already located on the Round Rock campus will be expanding their
practices. A summary of the Hospital's recruitment goals and strategies is
attached as Exhibit #2.
5
Round Rock
Hospital
Other
Columbia
Facilities
Seton
Network
Georgetown
Hospital
John's
Community
Hospital
Cardiology
17%
18%
34%
14%
9%
General Surgery
13%
17%
57%
11%
2%
General Medicine
19%
24%
37%
27%
4%
Orthopedics
18%
20%
46%
15%
5%
Obstetrics
18%
22%
45%
13%
0%
All Services
18%
21%
42%
16%
3%
significant outmigration in all services due to the pool aesthetic image of the
facility, inadequate space for outpatient services, outdated technology and lack
of a full range of services. Additionally, the existing primary care physicians are
operating at full capacity . The table below shows inpatient market share by
major service:
Round Rock Hospital Service Area — Market Share by Product Line:
Note: These market share percentages are based on 1994 data_ the latest official data available.
PHYSICIANS:
Protection. Competition in the Round Rock market is accelerating due to the
rapidly growing population. Scott and White has purchased 25 acres at 1431
and 1H -35 for a future hospital site. Scott and White is a major healthcare
provider in the area with a hospital in Temple, Texas (approximately 35 miles
north of Round Rock) and 18 -20 outpatient clinics in the Central Texas area.
They are also building a 10,000 square foot family practice facility
approximately two miles west of RRH. Scott and White currently operates a
satellite clinic in Round Rock with seven physicians. Additionally, they are
constructing a comprehensive outpatient facility north of C-eorgetown to serve
the "Sun City" project in thaz area. Travis Physician's Associates (TPA),
affiliated with PruCare, which works exclusively with the competition,
continues to expand in RRH's service area. A clinic was recently opened in
Cedar Park and another is proposed for Georgetown. TPA has an existing
clinic in Round Rock with approximately six primary care physicians. In
addition, several other competitors are establishing primary care offices and
other outpatient services in the area.
Volume Projections. Administration has projected incremental volumes in the
following areas: inpatient admissions, outpatient surgeries, births, and
outpatient visits (including MRI procedures). These projections are based on
capturing increased market share, physician recruitment, and new services.
Hospital Administration has an aggressive physician recruitment plan in place.
Several physicians in the Austin area have expressed an interest in relocating or
expanding their practices to the Round Rock campus. In addition, several
physicians already located on the Round Rock campus will be expanding their
practices. A summary of the Hospital's recruitment goals and strategies is
attached as Exhibit #2.
5
Facility Name
Number of
Beds (I)
Avg Daily
Census (1)
Percent
Ocwpaecy
Ownership
Distance from
RRH
Current
Overall
Market
Share (21
CSD Round Rock Hospital
56
33
59%
Columbia/St. David's
N/A
2.9%
CSD Medical Center
296
205
69%
Columbia/St. David's
15 miles
18.1%
CSD South
146
96
66%
Columbia/St. David's
20 miles
8.4%
Columbia Austin
Diagnostic Med. Center
100
56
56%
Columbia/St David's
7 miles
4.9%
Brackenridge Hospital
328
208
63%
City of Austin
16 miles
18.4%
Seton Medical Center
418
288
695'.
Daughters of Charity
14 miles
25.5%
Seton NW Hospital
57
39
68%
Daughters of Charity
8 miles
3.5%
John's Community Hosp.
45
13
29%
Community, non -tax
paying
19 miles
1.1%
Georgetown Hospital
49
25
51%
Hospital Authority
8 miles
22%
Oumtigration from Ann
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
15.0%
Total Market
1,495
963
64%
N/A
N/A
100%
COMP ETU OEtS:
(1) Setup and staffed; excludes skilled nursing beds.
(2) Based on 1995 patient days for the entire Austin market.
HISTORICAL OPERATIONS:
(1) The earnings decline in 1996 was primarily doe to large increases in bad debt and salaries expense. Hospital salaries were
adjusted across the board to bring the hospital's labor rata in line with the market to be more competitive A market study
was performed that indicated the hospital's labor rates were below the market. The increase in bad debt expense (from $2.6
million in 1995 to S4.2 million in 1996) was due to a business office system conversion (from Affinity to Patient
Accounting) and also moving business office operations to a centralized business office.
(2) The budget decline in outpatient surgeries for 1997 is due to the new on Ambulatory Surgery Center, which is nearly
completed. The ASC is expected to cannibalize hospital -based outpatient surgeries. However, through this project.
Administration expects to gain outpatient surgeries through increased market share from competitors and physician
recruiting.
6
'Si
Actual
1994
Actual
1995
Actual
1996
Annual %
Change
1991 — 1996
1997
Budget
Total Admissions
3,491
3,300
3,671
2.5%
3,375
Average Daily Census
37.3
40.0
38.4
0.8%
40.0
Total Outpatient Visits
13,394
14,047
14,581
4.3%. 15,900
Inpatient Surgeries
1,503
1,554
1,316
(6.4 %) 1,350
Outpatient Surgeries
2,563
2,714
3,237
12.4% 1,995 (2)
Deliveries
764
874
903
8.7% 9761
ER Visits
20,279
23,049
22,921
6.3% 23,000
Net Revenue (5000's)
527,162
528,439
530,638
6.2% 529,009
EBITDA (5000's)
56,035
56,466
53,894 (1)
(19.7%) 56.572
EBITDA Margin
22.2%
22.7%
12.7% (1)
(24.4 %) 227%
COMP ETU OEtS:
(1) Setup and staffed; excludes skilled nursing beds.
(2) Based on 1995 patient days for the entire Austin market.
HISTORICAL OPERATIONS:
(1) The earnings decline in 1996 was primarily doe to large increases in bad debt and salaries expense. Hospital salaries were
adjusted across the board to bring the hospital's labor rata in line with the market to be more competitive A market study
was performed that indicated the hospital's labor rates were below the market. The increase in bad debt expense (from $2.6
million in 1995 to S4.2 million in 1996) was due to a business office system conversion (from Affinity to Patient
Accounting) and also moving business office operations to a centralized business office.
(2) The budget decline in outpatient surgeries for 1997 is due to the new on Ambulatory Surgery Center, which is nearly
completed. The ASC is expected to cannibalize hospital -based outpatient surgeries. However, through this project.
Administration expects to gain outpatient surgeries through increased market share from competitors and physician
recruiting.
6
'Si
Total Facility:
Base Period
(1)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Deliveries
976
1,591
1,770
1,950
2,130
2,310
Skilled Nursing Admissions
224
315
327
357
369
383
All Other Admissions
2,575
3,344
3,353
3,643
3,471
3,692
Taal Hospital Admissions
3,775
5,250
5,450
5,950
6,150
6,385
New Outpatient Services -
22,735
23,685
24,621
25,593
26,604
27,655
MR1 Procedures
0
1,041
1,062
1,135
1,156
1,206
Bone Densitometty Procedures
0
625
637
681
694
723
Sleep Lab Studies
0
625
637
681
694
723
Speech Therapy Visits
0
208
212
227
231
241
Cardiac Rehab Visits
0
417
425
454
463
4.82
All Other Oorpatieat Visits
(excluding O/P Surgeries)
15,900
17,909
18,272
19,527
19,887
20,740
Outpatient Surgeries
1,995
3,055
3,115
3,610
3,670
3,730
Market Share hi Service
1997
Projection
Projected
Year 1
Projected
Year 2
Projected
Year 3
Projected
Year 4
Projected
Year 5 .
Total Deliveries in the Market
4,420
4,588
4,762
4,942
3,129
5,324
RRHDeliveries
976
1,591
1.770
1,950
2,130
2,310
MarketShare - Deliveries
22.1%
34.7%
37.2%
39.4%
41.5%
43.4%
Teal A.am the Market
22,735
23,685
24,621
25,593
26,604
27,655
RRH Admissions
3.775
5,250
5,450
5,950
6,150
6,385
Market Share - Admissions
16.6%
22.2%
22.1%
23.2%
23.1%
23.1%
Total Outpatient Surgeries in the
Market
1.
13,990
14,600
15,236
15,900
16,594
17,317
RAH Outpatient Surgeries
1,995
_
3,055
3.115
3,610
3,670
3,730
Market Share - OM Surgeries (1)
14.3%
20.9%
20.4%
22.7%
22 1%
21.5%
TOTAL FACILITY VOLUMES:
■61 Lti
(1) Base period volumes are based on the 1997 budget.
MARKET SHARE PROJECTIONS:
(1) The hospital performed captured approximately 21.1% of the market share for outpatient surgeries in 1996 (prior to the
opening of the an-campus ASC.
7
Incremental:
Base
Period (1)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Deliveries
976
615
794
974
1,154
1,334
Skilled Nursing Admissions
224
91
103
133
145
159
All Other Admissions
2,575
769
778
1.068
896
1,117
New Outaatieat Services:
987
Masterleaae Expense (1)
5158
581
521
521
MR1 Procedures
0
1,041
1,062
1,135
1,156
1,206
Bone Densitomeuy Procedures
0
625
637
681
694
723
Slap Lab Studies
0
625
637
681
694
723
Speech Therapy Visits
0
208
212
2.27
231
241
Cardiac Rehab Vi913
0
417
42.5
454
463
482
All Other Outpatient Visits
(excluding 0/P Surgeries)
15,900
2,009
2,372
3,627
3,987
4,840
Outpatient Surgeries
1,995
1,060
1,120
1,615
1,675
1,735
Net Revenue ($000's)
N/A
510,150
$11,449
515,244
$15,556
$18,154
EBITDA (5000's)
N/A
54,377
54,884
$6,418
56,844
$7,342
EBCLDA Margin
N/A
43.1%
42.7%
42.1%
41.3%
40.4%
EBITDA Remra on Investment
N/A
19.5%
21.7%
28.6%
30.39E
32.7%
EBITDA IMPACT (5000's) - Incremental Only:
(1) The base period volumes are bated on the 1997 budget
MOB - PROJECTED OPERATIONS IMPACT (5000's):
4111
(1) The rental rate is projected at 520.00 per square Coot in year one, with 2.5% annual increases each year thereafter.
(2) This is based on 40% of the projected ater-debt service cash flow. The debt semi= assumptions are based on 90% of the
ore being financed by the developer for 20 years at 8.5%
8
`lead
Y -•r2
Yas:3
Year
Year5
Tool Bramble Square Foet
39.468
39,468
39.468
39.468
39,468
Projection - Percent Leased
60%
80%
95%
95%
95%
Total Square Feet Lensed to
Physicians
23,681
31,574
37,495
37,495
37,495
Square Feet Mastetleased by
Columbia (50%of utarta pied)
7.894
3,947
987
987
987
Masterleaae Expense (1)
5158
581
521
521
522
Colombia's Income from Net
Profits Interest (2)
SO
(517)
(S46)
(552)
(S58)
Net Impact to Columbia -
. Expense / (Income)
5 158
564
(526)
(531)
(536)
EBITDA IMPACT (5000's) - Incremental Only:
(1) The base period volumes are bated on the 1997 budget
MOB - PROJECTED OPERATIONS IMPACT (5000's):
4111
(1) The rental rate is projected at 520.00 per square Coot in year one, with 2.5% annual increases each year thereafter.
(2) This is based on 40% of the projected ater-debt service cash flow. The debt semi= assumptions are based on 90% of the
ore being financed by the developer for 20 years at 8.5%
8
Financial Indicator
Protect Returns
Investment
522,461
Cost of Capital
13.0%
Net Present Value
511,375
N.P. V. Index
1.51
5 -Year Average EBITDA Rettro on Investment
26.6%
Discounted Cash Payback
8.8 years
Project Life
20 years
OPERATING BUDGET The project will have an impact in the first twelve months of operation as
IMPACT (5000's): follows:
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (S000's):
MANAGEMENT We have reviewed the scope, cost and EBITDA impact from this project and
REPRESENTATION: are committed to the following:
• The EBITDA targets for this project will be met.
• The scope of the project is adequate to meet the demand projected.
• Any cost overruns resulting from scope changes requested by the Hospital
must first be approved and then funded by the Hospital/Division/Group.
We understand this project may be subject to a post - investment review to
determine actual results versus projections. We will provide necessary data
regarding volumes and earnings to Capital Asset Management upon request.
Columbia /St. David's Round Rock Hospital CEO Date
Central Texas Division President Date
Central Group President Date
9
First 12 Month
Of Operation
Net Revenue
S10,150
EBITDA
54.377
Less_ Depreciation & Amortization
51.264
Pre-tax Net Income
53,113
OPERATING BUDGET The project will have an impact in the first twelve months of operation as
IMPACT (5000's): follows:
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (S000's):
MANAGEMENT We have reviewed the scope, cost and EBITDA impact from this project and
REPRESENTATION: are committed to the following:
• The EBITDA targets for this project will be met.
• The scope of the project is adequate to meet the demand projected.
• Any cost overruns resulting from scope changes requested by the Hospital
must first be approved and then funded by the Hospital/Division/Group.
We understand this project may be subject to a post - investment review to
determine actual results versus projections. We will provide necessary data
regarding volumes and earnings to Capital Asset Management upon request.
Columbia /St. David's Round Rock Hospital CEO Date
Central Texas Division President Date
Central Group President Date
9
RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this project for approval based on the need to protect and grow
market share. We further recommend Administration continue to work with
Design and Construction to find ways to reduce the project costs.
Investment Analyst Date
Director - Capital Asset ManagemEn[ Date
Vice President - Financial Planning Date
Approved by:
Coh President Date
Columbia/HCA Chief Executive Officer Date
10
'e
September 25, 1997
Texas Capital Fund Infrastructure Program
Texas Department of Commerce
1700 N. Congress
Austin, Texas 78711-2278
RE: City of Round Rock Application for 1997 Texas Capital Fund Infrastructure Program
The City of Round Rock has grown rapidly over the past ten years. The need for in- patient
and out - patient hospital care has grown with the population. The City in its desire to provide
needed services to its citizens has been actively working with Round Rock Hospital and its
owner, the Columbia Corporation. Round Rock Hospital has been a part of the community
for over twenty years. It was originally built for a small but thriving City. The City of
Round Rock is still a thriving community but no longer small. The facilities at the hospital
no longer meet the needs of the community.
Round Rock Hospital is situated on the north side of 620 less than a mile from IH 35.
Access to the hospital is only from 620. The City has worked with Texas Department of
Transportation to try to put a traffic light at the entrance /exit to the hospital to no avail. With
the expansion of the hospital the City has the oportunity to build a road behind the hospital
to allow hospital traffic as well as emergency vehicles onto a nearby road that has a traffic
light on 620. The project is eligible for application through the Economic Development
Administration (EDA), but does not meet the new priority system as set forth by EDA. The
project would have a minimal likelihood of being funded. Farmer's Home does not fund
these types of projects, nor does Texas Water Development Board. The Texas Capital Fund
is the only source of potential funding for this project. The hospital is now in desperate need
of expansion. With an already dangerous situation with accessing the hospital, the expansion
will just make it worse. This project must be accomplished to provide for the safety and
welfare of all citizens.
Your serious consideration for funding of this Capital Fund Infrastructure Project is greatly
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Charles Culpepper
Mayor
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE
OF
COLUMBIA/ST. DAVID'S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
The undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly elected and authorized Secretary
of Columbia/St. David's Healthcare System, L.P. The undersigned further certifies as follows:
Whereas, the City of Round Rock, Texas has a tax abatement program for real and/or
personal property for property designed as a "reinvestment zone "; and,
Whereas, the Columbia St. David's Round Rock Hospital, 2400 Round Rock Avenue,
Round Rock, Texas is planning to construct and equip additions and renovations to the hospital
and construct a medical office building in the approximate amount of $30,477,897.00.
Whereas, the Partnership can make an application to the City of Round Rock, Texas for a
tax abatement on the equipment in the following percentages:
1st year 100%
2nd year 100%
3rd year 75%
4th year 50%
5th year 25%
Whereas, in the opinion of the Board of Governors, it is in the best interest of the
Partnership to make an application to the City of Round Rock, Texas requesting the Partnership
property at 2400 Round Rock Avenue, Round Rock, Texas be designated as a "reinvestment
zone" so that the equipment can qualify for a tax abatement.
Therefore, be it resolved that the Partnership make an application to the City of Round
Rock, Texas for the Partnership property at 2400 Round Rock Avenue, Round Rock, Texas be
designated as a "reinvestment zone" and that a tax abatement be requested for the qualifying
equipment on the premises.
Resolved Further, that Malcolm Belisle, Vice President, Corporate Services, is hereby
authorized to make an application on behalf of the Partnership with the City of Round Rock,
Texas; and,
Further, that Malcolm Belisle, Vice President, make, execute and deliver an agreement on
behalf of the Partnership, upon acceptance of an application, to secure a tax abatement for
qualifying equipment.
1
Presented this 27th day of June, 1997, before the Members of the Columbia/St. David's
Healthcare System, L.P., Board of Governors.
C. W. Hetherly, Jr. Secretary
2
7— /
Date
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING THROUGH THE
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
TEXAS CAPITAL FUND INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Round Rock as follows:
SECTION 1.
The City Council has reviewed and hereby approves an application for:
Award for Round Rock Hospital, Columbia; 2400 Round Rock Ave.,
Round Rock, Texas; for Infrastructure Grant - $500,000
Administration Grant - $ 35,000
Local Match - 32,448
SECTION 2.
The City Council has reviewed and hereby agrees to comply with all assurances executed in
connection with the application and, if funded the award.
SECTION 3.
The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to act on the City's behalf in all matters pertain-
ing to this application.
SECTION 4.
The City Council has reviewed and hereby agrees not to participate in program income
recapture and will return all program income to the State to be placed in a statewide Revolving
Loan Fund to be used by the State to fund future economic development awards. By agreeing
to this measure, the city understands that it will be eligible to receive as many Texas Capital
Fund awards per program year as it has eligible projects.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Round Rock held on
September 25, 1997.
Charles Culpepper, Mayor Joann Land, City Secretary
City of Round Rock City of Round Rock
Revised September 17, 1997
33
ATTEST:
1996 Program Year
GENERAL CERTIFICATIONS
I, Charles Culpepper as Mayor of the City of Round Rock certify with respect to the expenditure of
funds provided under this contract by the Texas Department of Commerce, that;
1. It will minimize displacement of persons as a result of activities assisted with such funds;
2. The program will be conducted and administered in conformity with Public Law 88 -352 and Public
Law 90 -284, and that it will affirmatively further fair housing, as specified by Department;
3. It will provide for opportunities for citizen participation, hearings and access to information with
respect to its community development programs, as specified by Department;
4. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted in whole or in part
with such funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of
low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of
obtaining access to such public improvements unless (a) such funds are used to pay the proportion
of such fee or assessment that related to the capital costs of such public improvements that are
financed from revenue sources other than such funds; or (b) for purposes of assessing any amount
against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income who are not
persons of very low income, contractor certifies that it lacks sufficient funds under this contract to
comply with the requirements of clause (a).
5. In the event that displacement of residential dwellings will occur in connection with a project
assisted with TCDP funds, it will follow a residential antidisplacement and relocation assistance
plan, as specified by the Department.
6. It shall adopt and enforce a policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement
agencies within its jurisdiction against any individual engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstra-
tions and a policy of enforcing applicable state and local laws against physically barring entrance to
or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights demonstration
within its jurisdiction.
Revised September 17. 1997
Charles Culpepper, Mayor
9/25/97
34 1996 Program Year
The undersigned certifies Charles Culpepper, Mayor, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a
member of Congress, an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a member of
Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant,
the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or coopera-
tive agreement.
2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Con-
gress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection
with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete
and submit standard form - Ill, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying ", in accordance with its
instructions.
3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under
grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose
accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into
this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall> subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for
each such failure.
Signed: Date: 9/25/97
Charles Culpepper
Mayor
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING FOR
CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS,
AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
Revised September 17, 1997 . 35 1996 Program Year
SEP - 15 - 97 1UE l0'S0 AM ROUND ROCK LEADER
FAX Na 2553733
is
P. 2
1111
11111
„I I
I.I.
III
III
1111111111.
AMU
.1111...
MMIMIN
TO: To All Interested Parties
Working with Cities
and Counties
GRANT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS
P.O. Box 14571
Austin, Texas 78 761 -45 71
512/452 -0432 FAX 512/452 -5380
COMMENTS:
Bill Langford Associates
Grant Consultants
NOTICE
BILL LANGFORD
ASSOCIATES
The City of Round Rock is interested in making an application to the Texas
Department of Commerce for a Capital Fund Infrastructure Grant. Agency rules
require that service agencies for the City must be notified of public hearings for
the application. Please fmd attached a copy of the notice. Thank you.
NOTICE
The City of Round Rock has been made aware of the Texas Capital Fund Program
administered by the Texas Department of Commerce. It is the intent of the City of Round
Rock to consider an application for a grant under the 1997 Texas Capital Fund Program.
One public hearing will be held. The hearing has been called for Monday, September 22,
1997 at 5:15 p.m. at City Hall in the Council Chambers at 221 E. Main St., Round Rock
Texas, 78664 to provide information about all eligible activities and the past use of funds.
Please notify the City if assistance can be furnished to any handicapped person that
wishes to attend this public hearing. Written comments may be submitted by persons who
are unable to attend this hearing at City Hall during normal business hours.
For further information, contact Joe Vining, Director of Planning at 218 -5400.
Mayor Charles Culpepper
City of Round Rock
Bill LangJord Associales
P.O. Box 19571
Austin, Texas 78761
Bill Langford Associates
P.O. Box 19571
Austin, Texas 78761
Mary Bott
Williamson County Mental Health Board
212 Commerce Boulevard
Round Rock, Texas 78664
Karen Wilson, MN, MPH, Director
Williamson County and Cities Health District
P.O. Box 570
Georgetown, Texas 78627
Bill Langlbra Associates
P.O. Box 14571
Austin, Texas 78761
Bill Langford Associates
P.O. Box 14571
Austin, Texas 78761
Rick Atkins
Round Rock Community Center (Senior Center)
221 East Main Street
Round Rock, Texas 78664
Bruce Gill
Round Rock Housing Authority
P.O. Box 781
Round Rock, Texas 78680
COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Address the following needs for the applying jurisdiction.
1. Housing needs. Briefly describe the locality's most serious housing needs, i.e. deterioration,
affordability, or overcrowding.
The City of Round Rock was incorporated in 1912. The original housing stock is in poor condition. In
recent years, the City of Round Rock has grown with the building of new houses in the over $80,000.00
category, usually well over $80,000.00. There are still two neighborhoods in Round Rock that were
established over 30 years ago. The families that live these areas are working people. Unfortunately, the
salaries of most of these homeowners do not allow for major repairs to the homes. Out of 11,699 total
housing units in town, 199 or 1.7% were built prior to 1939. Many of the homes in these two neighbor-
hoods are in need of repair, some minor and many severe. 5,702 of the house holds in the City are owner -
occupied homes. Out of 5,702 specified owner occupied unit 854, or 15 %, are valued at less than
$50,000.00.
The Round Rock Public Housing Authority has 88 units available with 61 section 8 assisted vouchers.
Three privately owned facilities through Section 8, FMHA and 202 housing have another approximate 166
units available.
The most serious housing problem for Round Rock is affordable housing. As described above, some
deterioration of the housing stock exists, however, deterioration is not as much of a problem as is
affordable housing.
2. Economic Development needs. In this section, evidence of need might include the percentage and
number of unemployed persons, sales tax trends, plant closures, industrial vacancy rate trends, or
structural and infrastructure deterioration in commercial /industrial areas, and public benefit. Public
benefit includes job creation for Low and Moderate Income persons and others, spin off development,
local tax benefits, construction jobs and other special benefits. Please be sure to document the public
benefit.
The City of Round Rock in 1970 had a population of about 3,000 people. The 1980 census showed
a population of about 13,000, growing to 32,000 in 1990. Today's population is a 50% increase over the
year 1990.
The City began as a bedroom community of Austin. Round Rock is located about 20 miles north of
downtown Austin. As a bedroom community, residential housing and the infrastructure to develop it was
the focus of the city. The city struggled with meeting the demands of this intense growth. As the city has
grown, the focus has shifted to economic development. Back in the 70's limited industry and commercial
business existed. In the late 80's early 90's the city realized the need to diversify the tax base. A very
aggressive economic development plan was established.
Round Rock is now home to Dell Computer Sales, Power Computing, McNeil Labs, Tellabs,
Teco/Westinghouse, Dupont Photomasks, Cypress Semiconductors and many other firms.
The city must continue to attract industry and commercial businesses to sustain the large population
with new, higher paying jobs. According to 1990 census data, 58.56% of the population is of prime working
age 18 -54. Over a third of the population is under 18 and is quickly growing up, looking for employment.
3. Public Facilities needs. In this section, evidence of need might include findings and actions taken by
State agencies, surveys of street conditions, and public works department reports on public
infrastructure deterioration.
The city is constantly upgrading the water and wastewater facilities to provide the capacity demanded
by this growing population. The city uses a combination of wells and surface water to provide the water
Revised September 22. 1997 .
36
1997 Program Year
supply to the city. A number of water and wastewater lines, particularly in the older areas of town are in
need of improvements.
Maintenance of the city streets is an on -going process. They are checked daily for pot -holes and
repairs are made. Major street improvements are accomplished on an annual basis as the budget allows.
4. Other Basic and Serious Needs. If the applicant's serious and basic needs cannot be categorized by
any of the three major areas above, describe here.
The city constantly strives to provide adequate outdoor recreation for its citizens. With gang activity
on the increase in the community, the city places a priority on providing more positive alternatives such
as sports to these children.
5. Discuss the projected and /or existing financial benefits (ie. tax revenues) to the applicant from the
business.
With the expansion of the Round Rock Hospital, the city will be able to keep the medical dollars spent,
local. With the increase in square footage of the hospital, the city will see increased water and sewer
revenues. The Round Rock Hospital will be viewed as more of a complete, full service hospital, meeting
all the needs of the local community.
6. Why is the applicant addressing this particular need?
a. What is the extent of the need? The Round Rock Hospital, since it was constructed in the 70's, has
not had any expansion or major renovation. To recapture a larger share of the market the hospital
must enlarge and renovate to meet all of the needs of the community. The city supports local
businesses and wants to make these improvements available to the hospital.
b. How has this need been documented? A market study was contracted through Columbia/St.
David's Healthcare System, L.P.
7. How does the applicant propose to resolve the identified need? The City will construct a new road and
waterline for the Round Rock Hospital through the Texas Capital Fund.
a. Are any non -TCDP funded activities pending that would further address the need? No.
b. Are there any indirect benefits to the community as a result of this activity? The city will have
another roadway and waterline to maintain. The roadway will provide an alternate route for traffic in
this specific neighborhood.
c. Is this activity part of any existing local plan, policy, or strategy? No.
8. To what extent does the project capitalize on underutilized capacity? [For example, is the business
locating in an existing industrial park and/or building that has infrastructure improvements already
available? Is a currently vacant structure going to be used for the business's operations? Is the land
(on which the structure is going to be built) already on industrial -zoned land owned by the business or
city government ?]
The improvements to the hospital will be constructed on hospital owned land. The hospital itself will
be expanded and a new birthing center building will be added as well as some medical professional
buildings.
9. To what extent does the proposed project diversify the local economic base? A larger medical facility
will provide more medical jobs to the area.
a. What is the major economic base of the area? Computer industries/businesses.
b. List the number and types of existing industries/businesses
Major employers Description # of employees
Dell Computer Corp. Computers 1,500
Revised September 22, 1997
37 1997 Program Year
Farmers Insurance
Michael Angelo's Gourmet Foods
Tellabs
Wayne Dresser
Sysco Foods
TN Technologies
Cypress Semiconductor
Legacy Lamp
Westinghouse Motor Co.
DuPont Photomasks
McNeil Consumer Products
Weed Instruments
AMP Packaging Systems
Carroll Touch
Preferred Stamping
Insurance
Food Processing
Telephone components
Pump Controls
Food distributors
Electronic measurements
Semiconductors
Residential lamps
Industrial motors
Glass negatives
Tylenol products
Temperature sensors
Computer backplanes
Touch control monitor
High -Tech sheet metal
Mission Industries Clean room garment Laundry45
MicroBac International Inc. Bacteria for commerial use 30
c. Regarding the proposed project, will the business (names in this application) be independent of, in
competition with, or in support of existing businesses? No other hospitals are in Round Rock.
Revised September22, 1997
1.636
500
490
330
270
250
250
200
175
152
150
135
135
135
90
38 1997 Program Year
ACTIVITY
1 2
3 4
5 6
7
6 9
10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 10
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36
1. Contract
xx x
I I 1
Negotiation
2. Environmental.
X--
Review
3. Real Estate:
Acquisition
N /A
Equity
4. Infrastructure
N/A
5 . Bldg. Coast.
X ---
--
----------
---
- —
- -
6. Working
Capital
N/A
7. Mach. & Equip.:
N/A
Acquisition
Equity
8. Engineering
X --------- --
--
---
--
---
- --
-------
--
9. Administration
X -
- --
---
---
------°
"
—`-
10. Audit /Closeout
X
-- -
11. Other
NUMBER OF JOBS:
CREATED PER OlR
6
4
4
2
2
2
2
RETAINED PER OTR
Exhibit C
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
CONTRACT BEGINNING DATE:
CONTRACT ENDING DATE:
12/1/97
11/31/00
Activity
Presently Undertaken
Will Be Undertaken
Passing a fair housing ordinance
X
Developing a strategy to pass a fair housing ordinance
$
$
Initiating a fair housing counseling service
$
Assisting fair housing groups
$
$
Establishing local complaint and monitoring processes
$
$
Providing housing choices outside historically minority
and/or low /moderate income neighborhoods
$
Assisting housing projects that are racially mixed
Enforcing fair housing guidelines that are equivalent to a
fair housing ordinance
Adopting and distributing fair housing policies
Designating April as Fair Housing Month and performing
activities in support of Fair Housing
X
Contract No.
Contract Amt.
Total Amt. Projected
Program Income
Total Amt. PI Collected
Total Amt. PI Redistributed
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
For all program income (PI) that has been collected and redistributed, please attach a brief listing of activities
that were funded with same. Please be aware that contractors are required to utilize program income on hand
prior to requesting additional funds from Commerce. Does the applicant have an RLF plan approved in writing
by TDHCA? Yes No X
Revised September 17, 1997
Complete all appropriate information for prior and current TCF contracts.
PROGRAM INCOME REPORT
FAIR HOUSING ACTIVITIES
Any locality receiving TCDP funds under the 1997 program year must certify that it will affirmatively further fair
housing. Using the form provided, please explain the activities presently undertaken to affirmatively further fair
housing and which new activities will be undertaken, if an award is made from the Texas Capital Fund.
Localities should be aware that, in the event of funding, these fair housing efforts will be monitored. Other
activities may be eligible, and the applicant should contact the Office of Business Services to determine
eligibility.
Indicate below which fair housing activities are presently undertaken and will be undertaken, if funded.
Activities which qualify as affirmatively furthering fair housing include, but are not limited to the following:
38
1996 Program Year
PART I APPLICANT/RECIPIENT INFORMATION
Indicate whether this is an initial report • Or an update report ❑
1. Applicant/Recipient Name, Address, and Phone Number (include area code)
City of Round Rock
221 East Main Street
Round Rock, Texas 78664
512/218 -5400
TCDP Application Identifier OR
TCDP Contract Number
N/A
2. Project assisted/to be assisted (project/activity description and its location by city and county)
Road and Water System Improvements
City of Round Rock, Williamson County
3. Amount Requested
OR Received
$ 535,000.00
PART II OTHER GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE PROVIDED/REQUESTED
No Other Government Assistance to Disclose ❑
1. Department/State /Local Agency Name
City of Round Rock
Address (City, State and Zip Code)
221 East Main Street
Round Rock, Texas 78664
Program
Texas Capital Fund
Type of Assistance
Local Match
a
Amount Requested /Provided
$32,448
•
2. Department/State/Local Agency Name
Address (City, State, and Zip Code)
Program
Type of Assistance
Amount Requested /Provided
$
3. Department/State/Local Agency Name
Address (City, State and Zip Code)
Program
Type of Assistance
a
Amount Requested /Provided
$
4. Department/State/Local Agency Name
Address (City, State and Zip Code)
Program
Type of Assistance
Amount Requested/Provided
6
Revised September 17, 1997
TCDP APPLICANT /RECIPIENT DISCLOSURE/UPDATE REPORT
39
1996 Program Year
PART III INTERESTED PARTIES
There Are No Persons With A Reportable Financial Interest To Disclose •
List All Persons With A Reportable
Financial Interest In The Project Or Activity
Social Security Number Or
Employee ID Number
Type Of Participation In
Project/Activity
Financial Interest In
Project/Activity
(Dollars and %)
PART IV REPORT ON EXPECTED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
Source Of Funds
See Sources and Uses of Funds.
Use Of Funds
See Sources and Uses of Funds.
a
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information given on this form is true and complete.
Signature
Date
Revised September 17, 1997
40
1996 program Year
09/22/97 12 :49 Pt&
P.O. Bon 9656
Austin White Lime Company
Mayor Charles Culpepper
City of Round Rock
221 East Main Strut
Round Rock. TX 75664
RE: Proposed Extension of Park Valley Drive
Dear Mayor:
a 4525380 NO.130 001
CHEMICAL, BUILDING AND STABILIZATION LIME
September 18. 1997
We are in full support of the proposed extension of Park Valley Drive. Robinson Land Limited
Partnership, et al will donate the right-of-way necessary for the proposed rood across the 4595 acres as
listed in Vol. 19 %, Page 197 north of the Round Rock Medical Center. It is our understanding that the
Park Valley Drive extension will be a 70 -foot wide road as per drawings completed by Rodrigues &
Huggins- Inc.
Sincerely,
A. H. Robinson, Ul
Partner
Robinson Land Limited Partnership
Amain. Twat 78766 512. 2553646 FAX 512388 -1220 WATS 800.553 -5063
September 22, 1997
Mayor Charles Culpepper
City Of Round Rock
221 East Main Street
Round Rock, Tx 78664
RE: Proposed Extension of Park Valley Drive
Dear Mayor Culpepper,
As owners of the tract of land located at the intersection of Oakwood Blvd and the proposed
intersection of Park Valley Drive, we support the extension. Additionally, we will agree to
dedicate the necesssary R.O.W. concurrently with the approval of our Planned Unit Development
application. It is our understanding that the roadway alignment will be along the south property
line of our tract, lot 20 of the Oaklands section 2- Revised, and that the right of way
requirements from our tract will not exceed 60 feet it is also our understanding that the roadway
the City of Round Rock intends to build will include all water, waste water end electric lines in the
ROW or easements
We will be happy to discuss easements and details with the city staff to facilitate this process
DATE: September 19, 1997
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting, September 25, 1997
Staff Resource Person:
Staff Recommendation:
Joe Vining
Approval
Item: 13.R. Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to submit a
Texas Capital Fund Grant Application for the construction of
Park Valley Drive improvements.
Staff proposes the submittal of this infrastructure grant to fund the construction of Park
Valley Drive from Oakwood Blvd. westward to Wyoming Springs. This grant is
submitted in conjunction with the planned improvements to the Columbia St.
David's /Round Rock Hospital. This collector street will improve circulation to the
hospital and surrounding medical uses.
The maximum eligible amount is $500,000. This will require an estimated City match of
$32,448. The engineering costs are being paid under a separate contract.
Proposed Park Valley Dr. Extension