The URL can be used to link to this page

CM-2014-611 - 12/5/2014City of Round Rock ROUND ROIX 'r.Agenda Item Summary Agenda Number: Title: Consider executing the Categorical Exlcusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a) (3) (i); Statutory Checklist, Compliance Checklist and an Environmental Review Worksheet for the CDBG 20142015 Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair Program. Type: City Manager Item Governing Body: City Manager Approval Agenda Date: 12/5/2014 Dept Director: Loris Lankford Cost: Indexes: Attachments: CAT EX SUBJECT TO 58 FOR LEGISTAR.pdf, COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST FOR LEGISTAR.pdf, STAT CHECKLIST WORKSHEET FOR LEGISTAR.pdf, STAT CHECKLIST PART 1 FOR LEGISTAR.pdf, STAT CHECKLIST BACK UP PART 2 FOR LEGISTAR.pdf Department: Finance Department Text of Legislative File CM•2014.611 HUD requires that every CDBG project file contain a written record of the environmental reivew undertaken for each project which is termed the Environmental Review Record (ERR). The ERR shall be available for public review and must contain all of the recommended formats. The ERR must contain all of the environmental review documents, public notices, written determination and any environmental review findings pertaining to the decision making and actions related to individual project. The CDBG Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair project required that a Categorical Exclusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a)(!), Statutory Checklist, Compliance Checklist and a Statutory Checklist Worksheet be conducted and executed by the Certifying Officer. Staff recommends approval. City or Round Rock Page 1 PHnHtl On iLU1010 LEGAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FOR CITY COUNCIUCITY MANAGER ACTION Required for Submission of ALL City Council and City Manager Items Department Name: Finenre Project Mgr/Resource: IULANarado Project Name: H.M.L. MW.ble Home Roper ContractorNendor: Council Action: ORDINANCE RESOLUTION QCity Manager Approval Attorney pproval Attorney t 0:\wdoxlSCClnts\0179\140MMUNICIPAL\00316378.XLS Updated 6/3108 JRrO�UN,D ROCK, TEXAS PA[.ION. PPOSYIRI I'V. CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TX 78664 Catee rical Exclusion Subject to 4S8.5 Determination for Activities Listed at 24 CFR §58.11W Grant Recipient: Habitat for Humanity of Williamson County Project Name: Affordable Hume Repair Project Description (Include all actions which are either geographically or fractionally related): Minor repair to include Porch and roof Location: 2020 Hathwood Circle Round Rock. TX Funding Source: CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA EDI Canital Fmd Oneratim Subsidy Hoce VI Other Estimated Funding Amount: $10.000 Grant Number: B -14 -MC -48-0514 I have reviewed and determined that the above mentioned project is a Categorically Excluded activity (subject to §58.5) per 24 CFR §58.35(a) as follows: 15 C'hA-'9614- LQ 0 58.35(a) (1). Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements (other than buildings) when the facilities and improvements are in place and will be ❑ retained in the same use without change in sin or capacity of more than 20 percent (e.g., replacement of water or sewer lines, reconstruction of curbs and sidewalks, repaving of streets); 58.35(a) (2). Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the ❑ mobility of and accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons; 58.35(x) (3). Rehabilitation of buildings and improvements when the following conditions are met: 58.35(a) (3) (i.)In the case of a building for residential use (with one to four units), the density is not ® increased beyond four units, the land use is not changed, and the footprint of the building is not increased in a floodplain or in a wetland; 58.35(a) (3) (ii). In the case of multifamily residential buildings: (A) Unit density is not changed more than 20 percent; (B) The project does not involve changes in land use from residential to non-residential; ❑ and (C) The estimated cost of rehabilitation is less than 75 percent of the total estimated cost of replacement after rehabilitation. 58.35(a) (3) (iii). In the case of non-residential structures, including commercial, industrial, and public buildings: ❑ (A) The facilities and improvements are in place and will not be changed in sin or capacity by more than 20 percent; AND (B) The activity does not involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to industrial, or from one industrial use to another. 58.35(a) (4) (1) An individual action on up to four dwelling units where there is a maximmn of four units ❑ on any one site. The units can be four one -unit buildings or one four -unit building or any combination in between; or 15 C'hA-'9614- LQ 0 The responsible entity must also complete and attach a §58.5 Statutory Checklist and Worksheet and a §58.6 Compliance Checklist. By signing below the Responsible Entity officially determines in writing that all activities covered by this determination are Categorically Excluded (subject on §58.5) and meets the conditions specified for such exclusion under section 24 CFR §58.35(a). This document mus[ be maintained in the ERR- AUTHORIZED RR AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Authorized Responst a Entity Mgmiture Laurie Hadley Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) 16 Date Interim City Manaeer Title (printed) 58.35(a)( (ti) An individual action on a project of five or more housing units developed on scattered sites when the sites are more than 2,000 feet apart and there are not more than four housing units on any one ❑ site. 58.35(a) (iii) Paragraphs (a) (4) (1) and (ii) of this section do not apply to rehabilitation of a building for residential use (with one to four units) (see paragraph (a) (3) (i) of this section). 58.35(a) (5). Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, or equity loans on an existing structure, or ❑ acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided that the structure or land acquired, financed, or disposed of will be retained for the same use. ❑ I 58.35(a) (6). Combinations of the above activities. The responsible entity must also complete and attach a §58.5 Statutory Checklist and Worksheet and a §58.6 Compliance Checklist. By signing below the Responsible Entity officially determines in writing that all activities covered by this determination are Categorically Excluded (subject on §58.5) and meets the conditions specified for such exclusion under section 24 CFR §58.35(a). This document mus[ be maintained in the ERR- AUTHORIZED RR AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Authorized Responst a Entity Mgmiture Laurie Hadley Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) 16 Date Interim City Manaeer Title (printed) '!ROUND ROCK, TW PUPPOSE. e14510N. PROSPEgfIY. CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TX 78664 Compliance Checklist for 24 CFR §S8.6, Other Requirements Complete for all projects, including Exempt (§58.34), Categorically Excluded Subject to §58.5 [§58.35(a)], Categorically Excluded Not Subject to §58.5[§58.35(6)], and Projects Requiring Environmental Assessments (§58.36). Must be completed for each individual nronerty address included within the nroiect description. ERR FILE # 1. §58.6(a) and (b) Flood Disaster Protection AM of 1973, as amended; National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 a. Does the project involve: Formula grants made to states, State-owned property, small loans ($5,000 or less), assisted leasing that is not used for repairs, improvements, or acquisition? ❑ Yes ®No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. If No, continue. b. Is the project located in a FEMA identified Special Flood Hazard Area? ❑ Yes ® No Project is located is FEMA map #48491C0495 Dated 9/26/08 If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, continue. Is the community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (or has less than one year passed since FEMA notification of Special Flood Hazards)? ❑ Yes ❑ No ff Yes, Flood Insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program must be obtained. If HUD assistance is provided as a grant, insurance must be maintained for the economic life of the project and in the amount of the total project cost (or up to the maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). If !-IUD assistance is provided as a loan, insurance must be maintained for the term of the loan and in the amount of the loan (or up to maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). A copy of the flood insurance policy declaration must be kept on file in the ERR. If No, Federal assistance may not be used in the Special Flood Hazards Area. Cite and attach source documentation: (Documentation should include a FEMA Flood Map showing project location in reference to flood zone designation. If flood map is not available, use best available information.) For additional information see: HUD Guidance on Flood Insurance: htms�//www onecpd.info/mvironmental-review/flood-insurance/ FEMA Map Service Center: hU://www.m%c.fema. NFIP Community Status Book: www.fema.gov/Pema/csb.shtm 50 2. §58.6(c) Coastal Barrier Improvement Act, as amended by the Coastal Barriers Improvement Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3501) a. Does the project involve new construction, conversion of land uses, major rehabilitation of existing structure, or acquisition of undeveloped land? ❑ Yes ® No If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, continue below. b. Is the project located in a coastal barrier resource area? ❑ Yes ® No Map of Teras Coast attached. If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yea, Federal assistance may not be used in such an area. Cite and attach source documentation: (Documentation should include map (e.g. Google Earth) noting project distance from Coastal Barrier Resources.) For more information see: CBRS HUD Guidance: bM,//www.onmpd.info/mvito=mtal-miew/CoasW-baffiff-resources/ CBRA mapper: http://wim.usgs.gov/cbrmavpgr/cbrmgpper.html 3. §58.6(d) Runway Clear Zones and Clear Zones [24 CFR §51.303(a) (3)] a. Does the project involve the sale or purchase of existing property? Yes ❑ No EK ]If No, compliance with this section is complete. If yes, continue below. b. Is the project located within 2,500 feet of the end of a civil airport runway (Civil Airport's Runway Clear Zone) or within 15,000 feet of the end of a military runway (Military Airfield's Clear Zone)? Yes ❑ No ® Documentation showing distance to nearest airports attached. If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, Notice must be provided to buyer. The notice must advise the buyer that the property is in a Runway Clear Zone or Clear Zone, what the implications of such a location are, and that there is a possibility that the property may, at a later date, be acquired by the airport operator. The buyer must sign a statement acknowledging receipt of this information, and a copy of the signed notice must be maintained in this ERR. Cite and attach source document (Map indicating project site in proximity to end of runway): For more information see: Airport Information: htto'//www.aimay.com/airports/ HUD Airport Hazards Guidance: httos://www.onecud. Notice to Prospective Buyers: htt=//www.onecpd.inl A 7 PRIZED RES ONSEILE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Authorized Respnsible Entity ignature Laurie Hadley Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) 51 Date Interim City Manager Title (printed) CITY OF ROUND ROCK CDBG 2014 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AFFORDABLE HOME REPAIR PROGRAM � rein \•_uun FIRM ''.. FLOCC WMMIS MR W1P E p zoxEx ', w�wnmEnn caxrT, y, ZCNE D 5 TN R r9 '� DIM\MN4\TN1�e.�r ZONEX a Xx} u� Al WvN IYn> ♦ ZONE 4E� xf j ZpIEX\ WN Vll�Itl!• N 2020 HEATHWOOD CIRCLE FEMA MAP N48491C0495E SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 Texas Coastal Managcmcnt Program Nn1 CK"RY -. IL V:hcY Nn nN -- _ L: C1LRir MA' T*UP ti I Ar 1 LT? :ALrwtu AiL17iK - GCtrTt�14: LA,A(.A "vf YrE A;TT _ . c/w�rukus iti1RT a+Lha 1Y?eART L k;VES7Y0,0 VlOo MATAGOR OA �1, 11 0 11� - � KENEQV ROUND ROCK, rx .1 .1 Google Maps Page I of 3 GO SIe Drive 29.7 miles, 29 min Directions from Round Rock, TX 78664 to Austin -Bergstrom International Airport mill 0 0 0 0 0 Cetlar Pert llgintl R[d.Tt]R6. _ ® � ...,. rA.wb mill 4 "�\ o 0 ..... tea... r � 1 E -" o �.,e, ®❑ =v-,- 0 —m n.e,ur,.r.rv. Yxmc, Pv i�rarv� Austin �® � erOumu Snxe.vaUn —O <upin "AfluMm�� © mtliollm@.. i unP srvr. O O Round Rock, TX 78664 A This route has tolls. Get on TX -45 E/TX-45 Toll from Greenlawn Blvd and S A W Grimes Blvd 2.6m/6 min i �,..,... OR<W M.RTOr. Q h �«vnu8 t 1. Head south on Greenlawn Blvd toward i < Parkside Cir 06 mi 4 <1 '1 2. Take the 3rd left onto Gattis School Rd Ill 3. Turn right onto S A W Grimes Blvd 4w y°"""^ • ` f' 1.0 mi 41 4. Turn left onto Louis Henna Blvd ! » ®' ''Mr 5. Slight left onto the Texas 45 Toll E ramp A Toll road ----- ab 40.2 mi Take TX -130 S to Texas 130 Service Rd ,m c in Travis County. Take exit 449 from o 0 TX -130 S https://v w .google.wni/maps/dir/Round+Rock,+TX+78664/ausdn+bergstrom+intemati... 10/30/2014 Google Maps Take TX -71 W to Presidential Blvd in Austin A 10. Merge onto Texas 130 Service Rd 23.5 mi/18 min 6. Merge onto TX -45 EM -45 Toll 11. A Toll road mi M 7. Take the Texas 45 Toll S/Texas 130 Toll 12 Merge onto TX -71 W S exit toward Austin 1.9 mi A Toll road 13. Take the exit toward Austin—Bergstrom _-0.9 mi O Intl Airport 8. Merge onto Texas 45 Toll/TX-130 S --___-1 mi t Ill Continue to follow TX -130 S Continue onto E State Hwy 71 Service A Partial toll road Rd 19.4 mi Ir 9. Take exit 449 toward Texas Turn left onto Presidential Blvd 71/Austin/Houston 16 mi 41 A Toll road — mi Take TX -71 W to Presidential Blvd in Austin A 10. Merge onto Texas 130 Service Rd z 40.,y 0 --- ----0.2 mi O Austin -Bergstrom International Airport 3600 Presidential Blvd, Austin, TX 78719 Page 2 of 3 i 0 https://www.google.romlmapsldirlRound+Rock,+TX+786641austin+bcrgstrom+intemati... 10/30/2014 A Toll road —o3 mi 11. Take the Texas 71 W ramp to Austin A Toll road mi A 12 Merge onto TX -71 W 1.9 mi M 13. Take the exit toward Austin—Bergstrom NbntlaJAI�El O Intl Airport El --___-1 mi t 14. Continue onto E State Hwy 71 Service Rd ---41 mi h 15. Turn left onto Presidential Blvd 16 mi 41 16. Keep left to continue toward Presidential Blvd --- 0 mi t 17. Continue onto Presidential Blvd z 40.,y 0 --- ----0.2 mi O Austin -Bergstrom International Airport 3600 Presidential Blvd, Austin, TX 78719 Page 2 of 3 i 0 https://www.google.romlmapsldirlRound+Rock,+TX+786641austin+bcrgstrom+intemati... 10/30/2014 L 1FAW1. NbntlaJAI�El O El z 40.,y 0 --- ----0.2 mi O Austin -Bergstrom International Airport 3600 Presidential Blvd, Austin, TX 78719 Page 2 of 3 i 0 https://www.google.romlmapsldirlRound+Rock,+TX+786641austin+bcrgstrom+intemati... 10/30/2014 Google Maps Page 1 of 3 Google Drive 75.1 miles, I h 17 min Directions from Killeen -Fort Hood Regional Airport to Austin -Bergstrom International Airport o � O O �f G ® KNn.FwllbodR Q emVk FM O ummm B uM f yaaJmn emmi � m GmRMMn © © COIIPp,gb,im uv � Mb Q wrt. Cngn..N.m Q (� Waw � PowE Pa4u (� ue m.0 WaA� p�nw ® ,+m Ymry m'rimY 1Ytll ® 0- .J rwn vwMb Mr aimmiie a.wa. Q Killeen -Fort Hood Regional Airport A This route has tolls. 8101 S Clear Creek Rd, Killeen, TX 76549 Take Ivy Mountain Rd, Oakalla Rd and FM2657 to US -183 S in Burnet County �O - 2u6m,'25 min � ® �aonawa PvwiMv. O � t 1. Head southeast toward S Clear Creek Rd o 93 mi r' 2. Turn right onto S Clear Creek Rd ® ® e N 3 Turn right onto Ivy Mountain Rd -- a.5 mi p t 4. Continue onto Oakalla Rd p 42 mi t 5. Continue onto Co Rd 221 ---- 4-4 mi o O h 6. Turn left onto FM2657 &2 mi h 7. Turn left onto State Spur 308 45 mi O � O https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Killeen-Fort+Hood+Regional+Airport,+8101+S+Clear... 10/30/2014 Google Maps Follow US -183 S, Route 183A S/1 83A Toll Rd S and US -183 S to E State Hwy 71 Service Rd in Austin. Take the exit toward Austin - Bergstrom International Airport from TX -71 E m 151 min ti 8. Slight left onto US -183 S 349 mi t 9. Continue onto Route 183A S/183A Toll Rd A Partial toll road t lo. Continue onto US -183S 91 mi r ti 11. Take the Texas 71 E ramp on the left to ----358 ft Austin Bergstrom Intl Airport 16. Slight right onto Presidential Blvd - .0.4 mi x 12. Merge onto TX -71 E 17. Keep left to continue toward 1.0 mi 13. Take the exit toward Austin - Bergstrom _. _.__..... _. 01 mi International Airport 18. Continue onto Presidential Blvd 82 mi Drive to Presidential Blvd 0..9+ k I min E 14. Merge onto E State Hwy 71 Service Rd ^.1 mi r 15. Slight right toward Presidential Blvd ----358 ft r 16. Slight right onto Presidential Blvd O4 mi 41 17. Keep left to continue toward Presidential Blvd _. _.__..... _. 01 mi t 18. Continue onto Presidential Blvd 0,2 mi 0, Page 2 of 3 ED o o Y El .. o c Ai O O Aum.-e.pua. OO O Austin -Bergstrom International Airport 3600 Presidential Blvd, Austin, TX 78719 https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Kilicen-Fort+Hood+Regional+Airport,+8101+S+Clem... 10/30/2014 1r' ROUND ROIX. TEXAS W PPOSE. FAS410N PRWP011rY CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TX 78664 Statutory Checklist for Compliance with 24 CFR §S8.S — NEPA Related Federal Laws and Authorities (Must be completed for each individual addressed included under overall project description) Use this worksheet for projects that are Categorically Excluded Subject to 24 CFR §58.5 listed at 24 CFR §58.35(a) and for projects that require an Environmental Assessment. Project Name: Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair ERR FILE # Definitions: A: The project is in compliance. B: The project requires an additional compliance step or action. Statute, Authority, Executive Order A B COMPLIANCE FINDING SOURCE DOCUMENTATION Cited at 24 CFR 58.5 1. 58.5(a) Historic Properties [36 Project will not affect anyClearance letter from SRPO CFR 800 ro rhe historic s. attarhea. 2. 58.5(b)(1) Floodplain This project is not located FEMA map attached. Management [24 CFR 55, Executive within the 100 year Order 11988L_Rootl Iain. 3. 58.5(6)(2) Welland Protection This project is not located in See attached wetland maps. 24 CFR 55, Executive Order 119901 or near wetlands. 4. 58.5(c) Coastal Zone Management [Coastal Zone Management Act sections 307(c) & This project is not located d within a coastal zone. Map of Texas Coast attached. 5. 58.5(d) Sole Source Aquifers x Project is in Williamson [40 CFR 149] Project is not located within County which does not an EEA designated sole contain a sole source aquifer. source aquifer. Documentation attached. 6. 58.5(c) Endangered Species [5O X No critical habitat located in This project is likely to have a CFR 402] or near this project site. - No Effect" on federally protected species and critical habitat. 7. 58.5(f) Wild and Scenic Rivers x Project is located more than See attached map showing [36 CFR 297] 400 miles from a designated nearest wild and scenic river wild and scenic river. and project site, information on wild and scenic rivers including "Bow Far Is It" showing distance in miles. 8. 58.5(g) An Quality [40 CFR X Project is located in See list of onAli lament parts 6, 51961, 93] Williamson County, which is counties in Texas. not a Non Attainment area. 9. 58.5(h) Farmland Protection [7 Project is located in an area See zoning map attached. CFR 656] zoned for urban use. 10. 58.5(iXl) Noise Control and Property is not within 15 See attached map showing Abatement [24 CFR 51B] miles of a civilian or military distance from project site to airport, 1000 feet of a major nearest major roadway and highway or busy road, or railroad. Noise calculation u 19 ® Boa "A" has been checked for all authorities. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a) [Does not apply to EA or EIS level of review which can never convert to Exempt], the project can convert to Exempt, per §58.34(a) (12), since the project does not require any compliance measures (e.g, consultation, mitigation, permit or approval) with respect to any law or authority cited at §58.5. The project is now made Exempt and funds maybe drawn down; OR ❑ Box "B" bas been checked for one or more authority. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a), the project cannot convert to Exempt since one or more authority requires compliance, including but not limited to consultation with or approval from an oversight agency, performance of a study or analysis, completion of remediation or mitigation measure, or obtaining of license or permit. Complete pertinent compliance requirement(s), publish NODRROF, request release of funds (HUD -7105.15), and obtain HUD's Authority to Use Grant Funds (HUD -7015.16) per §58.70 and §58.71 before committing funds; OR ❑ This project is not a Categorically Excluded action pursuant to §58.35(a), or may result in a significant environmemal impact to the environment, and requires preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). Prepare the EA according to 24 CFR Part 58 Subpart E. MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL: (/f Boz B is checked provide details regardingfin4her consultation, mitigation, permit requirements or approvals 20 within 3000 feet of a railroad, not required. 11. 58.5 (i) (1) Explosive and x As per HUD Rep Lauth Myers, See email from HUD Rep Flammable Operations [24 CFR 51C] the interpretation of rehab and Laura Myers and a memo to modernization as described in file from CDBG staff the ASD Guidebook, refer only attached. W such repairs and renovation that will result in an increase in the number of people, or converting the use of a building to human habitation, or making a vacant building habitable. This project scope does not involve this type of renovation that will increase number of people. 12. 58.5(1)(1) Airport Hazards Property is not within 5,000 See list of military and (Runway Clear Zones and Clear x feet of a civilian airport, civilian airports and distance Zoncs/Accident Potential Zones) [24 runway clear zone, or 15,000 of these airports from project CFR51D] feet of a military airfield, site attached. clear zone or accidental otential zone. 13. 58.5(i)(2)(i-iv) Contamination X Project site is not located See documentation on and Toxic Substances [24 CFR within any of the minimum contamination and [Dale 58.5(i)(2)] search distances.substances near project site and memo from City staff on rior use of this project site. 14. 58.50) Environmental Justice Nature of project will not Project is not located in or [Executive Order 12898] impact Environmental designed to serve a Justice. predominately minority and low to moderate income neighborhood. ® Boa "A" has been checked for all authorities. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a) [Does not apply to EA or EIS level of review which can never convert to Exempt], the project can convert to Exempt, per §58.34(a) (12), since the project does not require any compliance measures (e.g, consultation, mitigation, permit or approval) with respect to any law or authority cited at §58.5. The project is now made Exempt and funds maybe drawn down; OR ❑ Box "B" bas been checked for one or more authority. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a), the project cannot convert to Exempt since one or more authority requires compliance, including but not limited to consultation with or approval from an oversight agency, performance of a study or analysis, completion of remediation or mitigation measure, or obtaining of license or permit. Complete pertinent compliance requirement(s), publish NODRROF, request release of funds (HUD -7105.15), and obtain HUD's Authority to Use Grant Funds (HUD -7015.16) per §58.70 and §58.71 before committing funds; OR ❑ This project is not a Categorically Excluded action pursuant to §58.35(a), or may result in a significant environmemal impact to the environment, and requires preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). Prepare the EA according to 24 CFR Part 58 Subpart E. MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL: (/f Boz B is checked provide details regardingfin4her consultation, mitigation, permit requirements or approvals 20 required to be incorporated into public notices andproject requirements such as contracts, grants, loan conditions, etc. as described in the Statutory Worksheet). Ensure required measures are included in 7015.15 Project Description Section. . P PARER: /�//,, �� f lrlGlJ ✓I/J'� 2 O� 2 (// Vreparer48igneutre Date Elizabeth Alvarado CDBG Coordinator preparer's Name (printed) Title (printed) AUTHORIZED RESPONSH3LE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Authorized Responsible Entity Tinature Date Laurie Hadley Interim City Manager Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) Title (primed) 21 TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION RECEIVED " 13 2014 REQUEST FOR SHPO CONSULTATION: a, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and/or the An4QdWJW`"®H Please see instructions for completing this form and additional information on Section 106 and Anequiees Code consultation on the Texas Historical Commission website at httoYAvww the staftbr us/crm/crmsend shtml. ❑m This is a new submission. ❑ This is additional information relating to THC tracking number(s): Project Information Does this project involve approval, funding, permit, PROJECT NAME Q Yes (Please complete this section) Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair COBG 2014 FEDERAL AGENCY PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECTCITY PROJECT ZIP CODE(S) 2020 Hathwood Circle Round Rook 78664 PROJECT COUNTY OR COUNTIES Valerie Reed Sweed Williamson ADDRESS PROJECT TYPE (Check all that appy) 615 E. Houston Street, Suite 347 r Road/Highway Construction or Improvement r Repair, Rehabilitation, or Renovation of Structure(s) r Site Excavation r Addition to Existing Sttucture(s) r Utilities and Infrastructure (— Demolition or Relocation of Existing Structure(s) F" New Construction r None of these BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Please explain me projed in one or No, senlenoes. More details shodtl be included as an atlaUmeM to Oris form. minor repair to include porch and roof repoldreplaeemenl Project Contact Information PROJECT CONTACT NAME TITLE ORGANIZATION Elizabeth Alvarado CDBG Coordinator City of Round Rock ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE 221 East Main Street Round Rock Tx 78664 PHONE EMAIL (512)743-2804 Federal Involvement (Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act) Does this project involve approval, funding, permit, or license from a federal agency? Q Yes (Please complete this section) ❑ No (Skip to next section) FEDERAL AGENCY FEDERAL PROGRAM, FUNDING, OR PERMIT TYPE US Department of Housing and Urban Development CDBG CONTACTPERSON PHONE Valerie Reed Sweed 210-475.6800 ADDRESS EMAIL 615 E. Houston Street, Suite 347 Valerie.M.Reed-sweed@hud.gov San Antonio, Tx 78205 State Involvement (Antiquities Code of Texas) Does this project occur on land or property owned by the State of Texas or a political subdivision of the state? ❑ Yes (Please complete this section) Q No (Skip to next section) CURRENT OR FUTURE OWNER OF THE PUBLIC LAND CONTACT PERSON PHONE ADDRESS EMAIL VER 0811 REQUEST FOR SHPO CONSULTATION --PROJECT NAME: Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair CDBG 2014 2020 Heathwued Circle Round Rock Williamson Identification of Historic Properties: Archeology Does this project involve ground -disturbing activity? ❑ Yes (Please complete this section) ❑i No (Skip to next section) Describe the nature of the ground -disturbing activity, including but not limited to depth, width, and length. Describe the previous and current land use, conditions, and disturbances. Identification of Historic Properties: Structures Does the project area or area of potential effects include buildings, structures, or designed landscape features (such as parks or cemeteries) that are 45 years of age or older? ❑ Yes (Please complete this section) 0 No (Skip to next section) Is the project area or area of potential effects within or adjacent to a property or district that is listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places? ❑ Yes, name of property or district: ❑ No ❑ Unknown In the space below or as an attachment, describe each building, structure, or landscape feature within the project area or area of potential effect that is 45 years of age or older. ADDRESS DATE OF CONSTRUCTION SOURCE FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE ADDRESS DATE OF CONSTRUCTION SOURCE FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE ADDRESS DATE OF CONSTRUCTION SOURCE FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE Attachments Please see detailed instructions regarding attachments. Include the following with each submission: ❑o Project Work Description ❑ Maps ❑i Identification of Historic Properties g Photographs For Section 106 reviews only, also include: ❑ Consulting Parties/Public Notification ❑ Area of Potential Effects ❑ Determination of Eligibility ❑ Determination of Effect Submit completed form and attachments to the address below. Faxes and email are not acceptable. Mark Wolfe State Historic Preservation Officer Texas Historical Commission P.O. Box 12276, Austin, TX 78711-2276 (mail service) 108 W. 16th Street, Austin, TX 78701 (courier service) For SHPO Use Only NOT ELIGIBLE for listing in the National Register of Historic Places by PIR T AYhF!gCEED ''//��, for Mark Wolfe State Historic P servatio Offi r Date PAGE 21 VER 0511 CITY OF ROUND ROCK CDBG 2014 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AFFORDABLE HOME REPAIR PROGRAM FIRM ROOEEINEWICEMnIMP zoNEa .a wuafA�oN 000mv. ZONE E Q •fE%AS FB A � xY1d�lYNIMRY••PAi �9 ZONE g 1 (Nld pinup^ W IDIS[ PuN Cmk� 04 ZCWE AE W Wt• �W ZONE% • WNEW_ y NEIWII; 2020 HEATHWOOD CIRCLE FEMA MAP #48491C049SE SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 }( § 0 / \ C w � CL |$ CD * § #B o | |!; \ m m / . ■��■■■■■ � § E a !� - C v 1 C 'z a � S Z � 3 M A p i rt Ct 7 CL fA g C SES, 3 i O 6eeyy� S�E z �43 's@E lie 9> ;i 1;x w 3L$ 1111111 � N A_ o O P S a sAllaral U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2020 REATHWOOD National Wetlands Inventory Od3o. 014 Wetlands Well %.:♦ ' • v �., �. - Oz`s \s _ _ Froshvnror Emerasm !// Frofhwalx FaroskNSPM •Water _ _ ESWeanne and Manne� Saflar TdOk Ealaann.and Mann. _ Freshwater Pand 2 / Lake 0 44I Rirenne •..3 'r� I . '� aver g SO . ,. , ' �. a Park v soon Park a d' User Remarks: ,M..n..d...a,....�m. .a�..�a.e.....,.,,.,i•.., MhM,m..n— HFH HOME RPR CDBG 2014 � _| ( } �|��! ||!!| , . � ;,!!;!!! . . � B ■��■■■■■ m \� . % m � \ \° k \� � �| � .� . § } � � \ . T7 : �� 2 ^ : �� § `Texas Coastal Management Program TW!.. `L4+k urr�rwJj M.]MI[ICN+t12Y L:UL�ii �t r_ 1 PASIAUP J IKiJrf ��' �Ge+Tn1F5 y lA`JA(A m I OF W31"G Cfif1ATlip L�einLho 1 e�Az-c�t►, � 1 MATAGORDA CALHOUN � L O` (:NAML1Lk!. C.k. VEST ROUND ROCK, TX SAN MI_K, 7 n r near, ` YFNFrn l0 0 f7 7� hwles YL o1w,� LA'- 1�• � 'Y 1 mmmmm000000000000000000000000�DDDDpA 00000222222522222222222222222 AAAA 000000000000000000000000WNCCC mm DDDDD 000000000000OOOOOOOOOOOOC 1 9 000000 cc C C 00000DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDD�(�-�� NNNNNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArnmmmmm DDDDDCCCCCCCCC AAA AcmA CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGI m 3 Gl L!(}1 L11D KA 3 cmA cmA cmA =Acm m mN mN mmN mmN mmN mmN mm m mm mm mm mm m mm mm mm m mm mm mm NNNNNN m mmmmm Nm Nm NNNNNNNN {{ZZZZZZ 000000 I N N 1� N N N N N N N �DDDDDD rtimmmmmm 3��333�333�33�333�333 mmmmmmmmmmmmm(�(� M mAAAAAA gcccccc mmmmm mmmmmm m AAAAAA AAAAA mmmmm NNAAAA -a-immmm 00000 DDDDD AA0000 DDDDD TT AAAA AOO mmmmm GIN oa mmmm MM **0NN 000 zzzzz mmmmm NNzzzz oommmm mA m m A mA X X X D D S F S> 5 5; F v S> rD x 77,71; 100 � A AAAA Gl Gl N(� N N N NN N N NN N NN N N N�J N NN N NN N NN N NN N NN N NN N NN N N N N N N N O O O O yy b 0( NIOD �0N41 �fWO V bN W N � m( V W V 4Wi tVD NNtilbfNO 4N) W+IoO W W (O W (O tO -1m -DI�r�OrD ZpAZAZDc O{y�y D Z 3�-31 ZnDTPADGZ OA zDOy ArA 0 m0 mz0{-� C> 0 mmm="�mSD-zlm N -i �Nr p;u ;uu r O��r m r 0 z z{ A �j0 o m Om z r.AcO- Z 0 5 zm�m C N O 0 O 0 0 z J C = m S A N < 0 D m N WWtnrnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 00 0 0 0 W W W W W W O 0C 0 v v 0 v 0CC 0 0 v O O v v 0C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CCCCC A'0 'p T'0 '2 �{L G GG>G <<0 - S -{.Mm SSSSZ000 m z z z z D D D D� DA D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D m AAA m mm A m000o A 5 5 F. 5 OOvovvvvvvv 5 5 AAAA W W W W W W WWW A.�I W AA vvovvvvvvvvvvv W W A W A W A W AA W W A W A W A W A W 00; W W 00 W ZZZZZ =DDDDDOAOOOAo00000AAA000Ooo ppff ppoo �p pp ppDDDDDDDDD DDDDD D DDDDDDDDD ooO r r r r r W W W W W C C C C C C C C C C C C C c c c c c c c c c c c rrrrr____---------- 00 W W W Z ZZZZZTTTTT TTT TTT'llMMT _________0W TTTTTT'i D DDDDDD DDDD mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm AAAAAAA-------------AAAA MM OAOAo000000________________________ ccccccccccc- ------ m mmmmmmmmmmm m m m T m M:69 m:5 A Ayy AAAAA ANAAA NAN -mmml-ml-mi -Wi- mmmmmmm MTM W -Iw-immAA-'-'-u1x.1.w W W A A D D W W W W W W W W W mmmmmmm W AmAm W A A A A Amm D ��A�7777 i mAm D K O0-1-I D D o N �1Am1AmmA D M D K D K mA D K mA D K myAm 3 Am 3 �yAmpn 3 mAm DDD g� mA 3 � 3� D O DAA yO yOO A 9 ' r T r m rmm A o A o D Z D Z T rrrrrrr T T m m T m m rrrrrrmmmm ... T T .m W �� 000 NN0000000000000 omozzmmwmomw��0000 W OOomm W W Z Z m m W 0000000000000mmmrn W W W W W W W W W W W W Z Z Z Z C AAA C C c ;UA c c AAA c c c c c c c c 0m c 000 00000000000 mmm mmmmmmmmmm mm A.TDI.> w x;o A A.M;1 D TTT .m>>>DT. .1DI.x lz z z z z N N Nl Nl �.l W Wp W W W W W AWA A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I A I A I A I A I A I A W f�ilN00 f�II O .P AW w N(l10 W fATOAO o m OWO NJ 0Oi0 0 JW (O tO bl tT tO W (O W W W fO- W w W. W NblO�J»(O (O W Uf W+ mm��nnoDD-�mmA3r--ixm-ix-ixcA3��r.xOmOmmacA�� DDD-DOo 0ZZ 5 mzmmDp00 V Az-<Z 9 Z D< Z <WDAADZADW0{mW-0D�y W DD rZ Z m DA�m L n L 5 p W Dm� To,oV 0Rro mD mZ W ZA DO c 0 m NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 000000000000000000000000000000000 2222 2222222 2 -�22 � 2Rl-2 5R�� 2 2 2 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzAAxA�AAAA ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZ mmm 2222222222x22222222222x222x2S2222 �rrFFrrFPrrF��F��F�F��P�� N N 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N> N N N N N N W N N W N PFS W N N DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD PPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPAP cccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccc m mmmmmmmrnmmmmmmmmmmmmm AA�2AyAySAAAAAAAAyA m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m AAyyAAAAAyA m m m T T mmmmmmm T T T AAA T T T% T m mmm AAA m m yA N mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm N N N N N N N N N N N N N mN mN mN mN Nm mN m1N N N NT N1 m ggg3gggg3ggggggggggggggg3gggg �3 55555555555555555 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W a - - N NN N NA NN NG NA�I UW NN+Wmo+JJ 0 0OO b m Wm mN J VN N WN W+ JI rDDg �grSmSTOODD**�-4JNNNNNN�Ogren-Ml x�Z TZ�OSgymmD Z Z11�1�10 A 0�TmI I �pr� ZmxOz Amw m_0 p0 TOZv-1 mm�DOmgl�xy_y N NNNNN1g y50mmy xNZm yNG1m<. Z7,A, ZrmA Z00 r20 mWZN�gp m z2r�mZ0��: OZ�Z Z M Z z m Op � 23�pZZDONZOO OZZ{�>W, ZZ m. . yn D{ Om Zw DO W D m c G) v m y ROUND ROIX, TEXAS THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK PUPPOSE. PMSION vROSVEa�T' MEMORANDUM TO: Habitat for Humanity Single Family Rehab ERR Project File FROM: Elizabeth Alvarado, CDBG Coordinator DATE: October 30, 2014 SUBJECT: "No Effect' on Endangered Species The City of Round Rock CDBG Program Year 2014-2015 for single family rehabilitation at 2020 Heathwood Circle includes repair of porch and roof. I reviewed the USFWS and NMFS Endangered Species Act -Species Search and Critical Habitat websites for Williamson County. There were no Critical Habitat in or near the project site. Based on the nature of the project and information reviewed from the USFWS and NMFS websites, it is my opinion that the nature of the project will likely have "no effect" on federally protected species and critical habitat. 2020 HEATHWOOD HFHWILCO AFF HM RPR 2014 •r4 [ If ;8 5� Mew 4 i 4 e�p'wa m1 E2 Him ®C.10,2008ESPL NI nge¢resene4Pn..d.n�M14... GM. Vl_ °sr a t a P�Er• ew y P e a j > PEIxPE Y a i dd %gg °:.a BEL CCFO LEpPo NEP 0. 0n� ^OP GPBPLL01! g4 QO^ r~ C BRPPP V' � BIEPPP BEI ° e®23 aB �a� P S __ ° ByuEP*° 5\EPPP 9 '�ea BE E^ neElrE /I 8 PP � l a 46 fER9E \aNx�/. j G M PP / r R oa, ®d j/6$ \B M 4J_/ b JBNN< E _...� ° i Eo dj F. E4 is.i�q m CI � ✓ XPi r L DOW ° a �� e3 $ �_ =0 e e g g How Far Is It? - Big Bend National Park (U.S. National Park Service) Page 1 of 2 How Far Is It? The Big Bend region is vast and isolated. Highway travel between destinations usually takes several hours and available services can be limited. Mileage from Big Bend National Park Headquarters at Panther Junction to: Abilene - 392 miles Alpine -too miles Amarillo - 481 miles Austin - 474 miles Beaumont - 697 miles Big Spring - 281 miles Brownsville - 634 miles Brownwood - 398 miles Carlsbad Caverns NP, New Mexico (htto///www.nps.gav/cave/index.htm)Corpus Christi - 526 miles - 305 miles Dallas - 559 miles Del Rio - 253 miles M Paso - 329 miles Fort Davis -128 miles Fort Stockton -127 miles Fort Worth - 529 miles Guadalupe Mountains NP Galveston - 657 miles (bttp://www.nps.&Qv/gumo/index.htm) - 275 miles Houston - 610 miles Lajitas - 41 miles Langtry - 211 miles Laredo - 434 miles Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park CUW:///www.ups.gov/lyjo/index.litm) - 410 miles Lubbock - 358 miles Marathon - 69 miles Marfa -126 miles McAllen - 577 miles Midland - 242 miles Monahan -178 miles Odessa - 222 miles Padre Island Nad. Seashore aM://www.nRs.gQv/pais/in - 543 miles Presidio - 92 miles San Antonio - 406 miles Study Butte - 24 miles Van Horn - 200 miles Waco - 518 miles Ojinaga, Mexico - 93 miles x h m Pecos -191 miles San Angelo - 300 miles Sanderson -123 miles Terlingua - 28 miles Victoria - 526 miles Wichita Falls - 513 miles http://www.nps.gov/bibe/planyourvisit/niilesto_from.htm 9/15/2014 List of non attainment counties in Texas htti):/Iwww.epa.gov/oaqpsOOI/areenbk/ancl.htmI Brazoria Co 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Chambers Co 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Collin Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) (2008) Lead Frisco, TX - (Nonattainment) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Dallas Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) 8 Ozone (20008) 8) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Denton Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) EI Paso Co (1987) PM -10 x EI Paso Co, TX - (Moderate) Ellis Cc 8 Ozone (19997) 7) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Fort Bend Co 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Galveston Co List of non attainment counties in Texas htto://www.eoa.goy/oaaDsOO1/treenbk/ancl.htmI 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Harris Co 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Johnson Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Kaufman Cc 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Liberty Cc 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Montgomery Co 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Parker Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Rockwall Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Tarrant Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) List of non attainment counties in Texas h"p://www.epa.goy/oaqpsOOI/greenbk/ancl.htmi Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Waller Co 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Wise Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) 9 COQ o, Milwo all" oo�n�s■ �� ■ a yua � €4 s!ll6 Re S G n 2020 Hea'thwood Cir "f IZUU mwlmo Cir �v�:a�e t sem. 2�• • w.`iWev`I° 'a�d9 i • 2 cv t, •• OF b . �•• �,' � RAILROADS • *j; PARCELS •� �"' • �_ L _I Unre ded Q Recod.&Mt..V ReplMitg Elizabeth Alvarado From: Myers, Laura L <Laum.L.Myers®hud.gov> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 11:61 AM To: Elizabeth Alvarado Cc: Britton, Berbera R Subject: RE: housing authority project Liz, For the level of upgrades you are doing (replacing appliances and some HVAC units, painting, and fencing( y u wIIQ„_ I not need to do a nesse level calculation. I would strongly conslder asseyou, ssing tire noise Issue. Itria very easy to as mmoto do an energy l ate especially ort osethatare nearest the railway, noise attenuation when upgrading energy efficiencv in the home. R/ LM From: Myers, Laura L Sent: Thursday, November 17, 7011 10:43 AM To:'Elizabeth Alvarado' cc: Britton, Barbara R Subject: RE: housing authority Project Liz, You will still need to address noise in the enviromnemal review process. Is there an airport within 15 miles ofthe slte7 is there a major roadway within 1000 feet ofthe site? is there a railway within 3000 feet of the site? Iftheanswerstoall of these questions are "no" then you have done all you need to address noise. If any of the answers are yes, then a noise analysis would need to be done to calculate the DNL of the site. If the site DNL Is less than 65dS, then you have done all you need to address noise. For major or substantial rehab projects, lithe DNL is 65-75 dB HUD encourage$ noise attth the 75 dBeHUDlonto strongly encouded In renovations rages ges conersion ofthe noiso-exposmmensurate ied site level land usevnom compaibleion planned. the with Nigh levels of noise. Please see Pert 51.101(a)15). As For addressing explosives and flammable operations, the regulations apply to any HUD-- ssisted projectas defined in 24CFR51.201. The Interpretation of"rehabilitation" and "modernization" in that definition as described inthe ASD Guidebook, refer only be such repairs and renovation of the HUD -assisted project that will result in an Increase in the number of people, or converting the use of a building to human habitation, or making a vacant building habitable. lithe above described type of renovation is planned for your project, then you will need to address this issue, which would begin with a site visit and visual survey of an area one mile in radius surrounding the site for any above ground storage tanks. If It does not involve the above described type of renovation, then you will only need to state that In You'•ERR. Let me know if I have answered your questions or if you need anything further. / From: Elizabeth Alvarado[mallto:lalwmdo®tnund-mdc.bc.usj Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20114:02 PM To: Myers, Laura L Subject: FW: housing authority project Laura, Since this project is more renovating and minor rehab how should I answer on explosives and flammables and toxic chemicals and noise abatement? Should I consult someone from the city on this as documentation. Thanks for all your help. ' Liz 341-3328 From: Elizabeth Alvarado Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20113:12 PM To: 'Myers, Laura V Subject: RE: housing authority project Yes they are hud funds but not cdbg. Thank you. From: Myers, Laura L [mallro:Leum.L.Myers@hud.govj Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20113:11 PM To: Elizabeth Alvarado Subject: RE: housing authority project I agree, although it only applies If HUD funds are being used. R1 LM From: Elizabeth Alvarado[mallto:lalverado@round-rock.tx.usj Sects Wednesday, November 16, 20111:54 PM To: Myers, Laura L subject. housing authority project HI laura, Anytime the Round Rock Housing Authority needs an environmental done even if Its not a project being funded with CDBG funds, I have to do the review. so the Housing Authority is asking me to do a review for the following project at the administrative office and the housing units at the housing authority main location being paid with CFP funds: Interior Renovations to Include painting Replace existing ranges with new ones Replace administrative equipment Replace existing HVAC systems with new ones per unit as needed I determined that the fors that I need to use are the following: Compliance Documentation Checklist Categorically Excluded Subject to 58.5 per 24 CFR 58.35 (a) 3 li Statutory Checklist (and it converts to exempt?) AirNav: Airport Search Results Page 1 of 2 M—Krrl MEN ®. r�: , .. g_ , .,... sj S� AINDOSS My AirNav_.. Airport Search Results 22 airports found near Round Rock, TX D) CITY AIRPORT NAME WHERE EDC AUSTIN, TX AUSTIN EXECUTIVE AIRPORT 8.8 nm SE GTU GEORGETOWN, TX GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 10.2 nm N T74 TAYLOR, TX TAYLOR MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 12.8 nm ENE 0 RYW LAGO VISTA, TX LAGO VISTA TX - RUSTY ALLEN 15.0 mn W AIRPORT ® 3R9 LAKEWAY, TX LAKEWAY AIRPARK AIRPORT 18.7 tun WSW AUS AUSTIN, TX ASR BERGSTROM INTERNATIONAL 18.8 m 88R SPICEWOOD, TX SPICEWOOD AIRPORT 23.0 mn W © BMQ BURNET, TX BURNET MUNICIPAL KATE CRADDOCK 32.1 nm WNW FIELD AIRPORT © GRK FORT HOOD/KI.LEEN, ROBERT GRAY AAF AIRPORT 34.4 mn NNW TX © ILE KILLEEN, TX SKYLARK FIELD AIRPORT 34.7 mn N © DZB HORSESHOE BAY, TX HORSESHOE BAY RESORT AIRPORT 35.2 mn W © RCK ROCKDALE, TX H H COFFIELD REGIONAL AIRPORT 36.4 nm ENE © HLR XRTHOOD(KILLEEN), HOODAAFAIRPORT 37.9nmN HYI SAN MARCOS, TX SAN MARCOS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 38.1 nm SSW 2KL SUNRISE BEACH SUNRISE BEACH AIRPORT 38.1=W VILLAGE, TX 84R © SMITHVI,LE, TX SMITIIVI.LE CRAWFORD MUNICIPAL 39.1 nm SE AIRPORT ❑+ 50R LOCKHART, TX LOCKHART MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 39.5 nm S © TPL TEMPLE, TX DRAUGHON-MILLER CENTRAL TEXAS 41 1 mn NNE REGIONAL AIRPORT © GYB GIDDINGS, TX GIDDINGS-LEE COUNTY AIRPORT 41.5 mn ESE T35 © CAMERON, TX CAMERON MUNICIPAL AIRPARK 42.7 nm ENE AIRPORT LZZ LAMPASAS, TX LAMPASAS AIRPORT 44.7 mn NW https://www.aimay.com/cgi-bin/airport-search 11/20/2014 2020 heathwood circle 2020 HEATHWOOD CIRCLE ROUND ROCK, TEXAS Ref: habitat for humanity cdbg 2014 Thursday, November 20, 2014 Environmental Radius Report NET itlllie 2055 Rio Pkwy NET"- Tempe,e, AZ 853875381 480.967.6752 Summary Aerial Views Flood Zones Hazard Map National Wetlands Map 2004, 1985, 1973, 1954 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Priorities List (NPL) CERCLIS List CERCLIS NFRAP RCRA CORRACTS Facilities RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities Federal Institutional Control / Engineering Control Registry Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) US Toxic Release Inventory US RCRA Generators (CESQG, SQG, LQG) US ACRES (Brownfields) US NPDES TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR TX Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks TX Drycleaners TX State Superfund Registry TX Brownfields TX Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites TX Innocent Owner Program TX Landfills Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) <1/4 1/4-112 1/2.1 4 7 2 5 2 �. ► �► a o.� •lk h � , '��. Yui 'i � '✓� �, ✓ � ,� /�.. � ~�. Flood Hazard Zones Map 6; R C ��04 _� 0 CI �F ROUND R CK j 481048 � d LL� V 38.53662, —97.67952 _,� 2 0 10,�017 ! I 1l a � CITir' OF Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Regulatory Floodway Special Floodway Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee National Wetlands &p / � k K r�011 '� � $ 2 f! e,_e, -97.67952 Estuarine and qEstuarine and Marine Wetland q esnmwew_and Freshwater Forested/Shrub _and Freshwater Pond Lake q mer Riverine National Priorities List (NPL) This database returned no results for your area. The Superfund Program, administered under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) is an EPA Program to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. The NPL (National Priorities List) is the list of national priorities among the known releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants throughout the United States and its territories. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation. The boundaries of an NPL site are not tied to the boundaries of the property on which a facility is located. The release may be contained with a single property's boundaries or may extend across property boundaries onto other properties. The boundaries can, and often do change as further information on the extent and degree of contamination is obtained. CERCLIS List This database returned no results for your area. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) investigates known or suspected uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous substance facilities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). EPA maintains a comprehensive list of these facilities in a database known as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS). These sites have either been investigated or are currently under investigation by the EPA for release or threatened release of hazardous substances. Once a she is placed in CERCLIS, it may be subjected to several levels of review and evaluation and ultimately placed on the National Priority List (NPL). CERCLIS sites designated as "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an intitial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund Action or NPL consideration. CERCLIS NFRAP This database returned no results for your area. As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" NFRAP have been removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the site being placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed these NFRAP sites from CERCLIS to lilt unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties. This ppolicy change is part of EPA"s Brownfields Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites. RCRA CORRACTS Facilities This database returned no results for your area. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA maintains the Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS) database of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities that are undergoing "corrective action." A "corrective action order" is issued pursuant to RCRA Section 3008(h) when there has been a release of hazardous waste or constituents into the environment from a RCRA facility. Corrective actions may be required beyond the facility"s boundary and can be required regardless of when the release occurred, even if it predated RCRA. RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities This database returned no results for your area. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA1 regulates hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA"s RCRA Program identifies and tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point ofi disposal. The RCRA Facilites database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities that report generation, storage, transportation, treatment, or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Permitted Treatment, Storage, Disposal Facilities (RCRA-TSD) are facilities which treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste. Federal Institutional Control / Engineering Control Registry This database returned no results for your area. Federal Institutional Control / Engineering Control Registry Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) This database returned 0 results for your area. The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a national computer database used to store information on unauthorized releases of oil and hazardous substances. The program is a cooperative effort of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation Research and Special Program Administration"s John Volpe National Transportation System Center and the National Response Center. There are primarily five Federal statutes that require release reporting: the Comprehensive Environmental Respponse, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) section 103; the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act(SARA) Title III Section 304; the Clean Water Act of 1972(CWA) section 311(b)(3); and the Hazardous Material Transportation Act of 1974(HMTA section 1808(b). US Toxic Release Inventory 4 3 . 9 ni 38.53962, -97:$7952 zi ajs ,Wig q r7) C& 434.) This database returned 4 results for your area. The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a publicly available EPA database that contains information on toxic chemical releases and other waste management activities reported annually by certain covered industry groups as well as federal facilities. TRI reporters for all reporting years are provided in the file. US Toxic Release Inventory Location 30.52903,-97.688 Distance to site 2730 It / 0.52 mi W Info URL http:lfiaspub.epa.gov/envirofii query_detail.dispyrogmiq_facility?p_registr y_id=11(X!021348985 EPA Identifier 110002134985 Primary Name DUPONTPHOTOMASKS Address 100 TEXAS AVE. City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 NAICS Codes 323122, 325992 SIC Codes 2796 SIC Descriptions PLATEMAKING AND RELATED SERVICES Programs RCRAINFO, TRIS, TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests CESQG, STATE MASTER, TRI REPORTER Updated On 22-JUL-14 Recorded On 01 -MAR -00 NAICS Descriptions PHOTOGRAPHIC FILM, PAPER, PLATE, AND CHEMICAL Updated On MANUFACTURING., PREPRESS SERVICES. Location 30.53634,-97.6915 Distance to site 43041t 10.82 mi NW Info URL httpYfiespub.epa.gov/envim/fii query_detaildisp_pmgram_faciW?p_registr y_id=110000599889 EPA Identifier 110000599889 Primary Name THERMO PROCESS INSTRUMENTS LP Address 2555 NORTH IH 35 City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786642015 NAICS Codes 334513 SIC Codes 3823,3644 SIC Descriptions INDUSTRIAL INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASUREMENT, DISPLAY, AND CONTROL OF PROCESS VARIABLES; AND RELATED PRODUCTS, X- RAY APPARATUS AND TUBES AND RELATED IRRADIATION APPARATUS Programs NCDB, RCRAINFO, TRIS Program Interests COMPLIANCE ACTIVITY, TRI REPORTER, UNSPECIFIED UNIVERSE Updated On 04-NOV-11 Recorded On 01 -MAR -00 NAICS Descriptions INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING FOR MEASURING, DISPLAYING, AND CONTROLLING INDUSTRIAL PROCESS VARIABLES. US Toxic Release Inventory Location 30.54089,-97.68887 Distance to site 4762ft/0.9 mi NW Info URL httpl6aspub.epa.go./enviroffl gwty_detail.dispymmgrefacility?p_registr y_id=1100021350 EPA Identifier 110002135001 Primary Name TELLABS OPERATIONS INC Address 601 JEFFREY WAY City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 NAICS Codes 334290, 334310 SIC Codes 3669,3679 SIC Descriptions COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED, Programs ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED Programs EIS, RCRAINFO, TRIS, TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY, STATE Recorded On MASTER, TRI REPORTER, UNSPECIFIED UNIVERSE Updated On 30-NOV-12 Recorded On 01 -MAR -00 NAICS Descriptions AUDIO AND VIDEO EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING., OTHER COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING. Location 30.54083,-97.68907 Distance to site 4784 It / 0.91 mi NW Info URL httpllraspub.epa.yov/envim/fii_query_detail.dispymgram_facility?p_registr y_id=110002134976 EPA Identifier 110002134976 Primary Name CARROLL TOUCH INCORPORATED Address 700-D JEFFREY WAY City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 NAICS Codes 334000 SIC Codes 3679 SIC Descriptions ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED Programs TRIS Program Interests TRI REPORTER Updated On 23 -FEB -01 Recorded On 01 -MAR -00 US RCRA Generators (CESQG, SQG, LQG) 0 e o- tM Ilk 30.53662 97. 7952 p ,°_1i5 ea �0% n This database returned 8 results for your area U Ov 35 Flt? 1n: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA maintains a database of facilities, which generate hazardous waste or treat, store, and/or dispose of hazardous wastes. Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or 1 kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Small Quantity Generators (SQG) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Large Quantity Generators (LQG) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste, or more than 1 kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. US RCRA Generators (CESQG, SQG, LQG) Location 30.5312, -97.68076 Distance to site 441 R / 0.08 mi NW Info URL hftp:/laspub.epe.gov/envirofi!_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_mgistr Zipcode y_id=110005009702 EPA Identifier 110005009702 Primary Name ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC Address 106 E TEXAS AVENUE City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786642143 NAICS Codes 221122 Programs RCRAINFO Program Interests CESQG Updated On 09 -AUG -10 Recorded On 01 -MAR -00 NAICS Descriptions ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION. Location 30.53366,-9T68734 Distance to site 2696 It / 0.51 mi W Info URL hftp:7daspub.epa.gov/envircAi_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_mgistr y_id=110038317764 EPA Identifier 110038317764 Primary Name ADVANCED LAB CONCEPTS Address 116 E OLD SETTLERS BLVD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786642248 NAICS Codes 337110 Programs OSHA-OIS, RCRAINFO, TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests LOG, OSHA ESTABLISHMENT, STATE MASTER Updated On 22-JUL-14 Recorded On 24 -APR -09 NAICS Descriptions WOOD KITCHEN CABINET AND COUNTERTOP MANUFACTURING. US RCRA Generators (CESQG, SQG, LQG) Location 30.52903, -97.688 Distance to site 2730 ft / 0.52 mi W Info URL httpYlaspub.eps.gov/enviroffii_query_detail.disp_orogram_facility?p_registr y_id=110002134985 EPA Identifier 110002134985 Primary Name DUPONT PHOTOMASKS Address 100 TEXAS AVE. City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 NAICS Codes 323M,325992 SIC Codes 2796 SIC Descriptions PLATEMAKING AND RELATED SERVICES Programs RCRAINFO, TRIS, TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests CESOG, STATE MASTER, TRI REPORTER Updated On 22-JUL-14 Recorded On 01 -MAR -00 NAICS Descriptions PHOTOGRAPHIC FILM, PAPER, PLATE, AND CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING., PREPRESS SERVICES. Location 30.5262,-97.68694 Distance to site 2838 It / 0.54 mi SW Info URL http://iaspub.epa.gov/envirofil_query_detail.dispyrogrem_facility?p_mgistr y_id=110005024794 EPA Identifier 110005024794 Primary Name PREMIER AUTOBODY Address 1809 N MAYS City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664-2125 SIC Codes 7532 SIC Descriptions TOP, BODY, AND UPHOLSTERY REPAIR SHOPS AND PAINT SHOPS Programs RCRAINFO, TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests CESQG, STATE MASTER Updated On 09 -AUG -10 Recorded On 01 -MAR -00 US RCRA Generators (CESQG, SQG, LQG) Location 30.53312, -97.69124 Distance to site 3794 it 10.72 mi W Info URL http://iaspub.epa.,.ov/envim/5i_query_detail.dispyrogmrrLfacility?p_registr EPA Identifier y_id=110054864232 EPA Identifier 110054864232 Primary Name CLASSIC HONDA & HYUNDAI Address 2301 N IH -35 City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786641568 Programs RCRAINFO Program Interests CESQG Updated On 28 -MAR -14 Recorded On 30 -JAN -13 Location 30.53102.-97.69514 Distance to site 4914 R/ 0.93 mi W Info URL http:lhaspub.epe.,,ov/envirofii query_detail.disp-progrem_facility?p_registr y_id=110059673731 EPA Identifier 110059673731 Primary Name FED EX FREIGHT AUS Address 2500 CHISHOLM TRL City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786812033 NAICS Codes 484122 Programs RCRAINFO Program Interests SOD Recorded On 20 -MAY -14 NAICS Descriptions GENERAL FREIGHT TRUCKING, LONG-DISTANCE, LESS THAN TRUCKLOAD. US RCRA Generators (CESQG, SQG, LQG) Location 30.52226, -97.69279 Distance to site 51681t 10.98 mi SW Info URL http:1fiaspub.epa.gov/envirori query_detaii.dispymgram_faciliry?p_registr Program Interests y_id=110013296334 EPA Identifier 110013296334 Primary Name ROSCO LABORATORIES Address 1600 CHISOLM TRAIL City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78681 NAICS Codes 335129 SIC Codes 3648 SIC Descriptions LIGHTING EQUIPMENT, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED Programs BR, RCRAINFO, TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER, SQG, STATE MASTER Updated On 22-JUL-14 Recorded On 31 -OCT -02 NAICS Descriptions OTHER LIGHTING EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING. Location 30.53602,-97.69505 Distance to site 5265 It l 1 mi W Info URL httplAaspub.epa.gov/envirolft'i query_detaii.disp_pmgram_facifity?p registr y_id=110034713567 EPA Identifier 110034713567 Primary Name CVS PHARMACY STORE NO 00928 Address 800 W OLD SETTLERS BLVD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786812119 NAICS Codes 812922 SIC Codes 5399 SIC Descriptions MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL MERCHANDISE STORES Programs RCRAINFO, TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests CESQG, STATE MASTER Updated On 22-JUL-14 Recorded On 17 -APR -08 NAICS Descriptions ONE-HOUR PHOTOFINISHING. US ACRES (Brownfields) This database returned no results for your area. Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) is an online database for Brownfields Grantees to electronically submit data directly to The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) US NPDES This database returned 0 results for your area. The NPDES module of the Compliance Information System (CIS) tracks surface water permits issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the discharge does not adversely affect water quality. TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR This database returned no results for your area. The TX-TCEQ ACR is a computer application that allows the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to use a single, centralized area to record common information, such as the company names, addresses, and telephone numbers of those the TCEQ regulates. It also contains additional IDs (permits, registrations, authorizations, etc) and their status. TX Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks Location 30.51742,-97.68564 Distance to site 5188 ft / 0.98 mi SW Facility Name PAYLESS 871 Facility Location 409 W TAYLOR AVE city ROUND ROCK Zip Code 78664 Reported 1992-05-19 Recorded 1992-06,09 ID Number 103115 Owner Name STRASBURGER ENTERPRISES INC Priority 4.1 Status 6A City TEMPLE State TX Zip 76503 TX Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks co � r I � O 3 O G0p Ini A.53862, —9717952 0041 D--GL-qb '� n^ n Y` Lu 4 • ��1r� This database returned 7 results for your area. Information on Leaking petroleum storage tanks containing hazardous or petroleum substances is maintained by The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), Petroleum Storage Tank Division. TX Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks Location 30.52991, -97.68486 Distance to site 1699 it/ 0.32 mi W Facility Name ROUND ROCK SERVICE CENTER Facility Location 106 E TEXAS City ROUND ROCK Zip Code 78664 Reported 1994-05-31 Recorded 1994-08-04 ID Number 108404 Owner Name TU ELECTRIC Priority 4.2 Status 6A City DALLAS State TX Zip 75201 Location 30.531, -97.68533 Distance to site 1832 It 10.35 mi W Facility Name ROUND ROCK PUBLIC WORKS FAC Facility Location 2008 ENTERPRISE DR City ROUND ROCK Zip Code 78664 Reported 200405-07 Recorded 200410-04 ID Number 116157 Owner Name CITY OF ROUND ROCK Priority 4.2 Status 6P City ROUND ROCK State TX Zip 78764 TX Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks Location 30.52768,-97,68764 Distance to site 2771 ft / 0.52 mi W Facility Name ROUND ROCK TIRE & CAR CENTER Facility Location 1915 NORTH MAYS ST City ROUND ROCK Zip Code 78680 Reported 1992-08-27 Recorded 1992-10-02 ID Number 104079 Owner Name ROUND ROCK TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE Priority 4.1 Status 6A City ROUND ROCK State TX Zip 78664 Location 30.53379,-97.68943 Distance to site 3323 ft / 0.63 mi W Facility Name AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP Facility Location 2355 MAYS City ROUND ROCK Zip Code 78664 Reported 1991-10-28 Recorded 1991-11-15 ID Number 100744 Owner Name LEIGH H R Priority 5 Status 6A City AUSTIN State TX Zip 78731 TX Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks Location 30.51773, -97.68385 Distance to site 4898 ft 10.93 mi S Facility Name DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORNER STORE 5 Facility Location 209 TAYLOR HWY City ROUND ROCK Zip Code 78684 Reported 1992-12-14 Recorded 1993-01-25 ID Number 105610 Owner Name DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF & MKTG CO Priority 4A Status 6A City SAN ANTONIO State TX Zip 78269 Location 30.51773, -97.68385 Distance to site 4898 it 10.93 mi S Facility Name DIAMOND SHAMROCK 537 Facility Location 209 W PALM VALLEY BLVD City ROUND ROCK Zip Code 78664 Reported 2006-02-21 Recorded 2006-03-27 ID Number 116806 Owner Name VALERO Priority 4 Status 6A City SAN ANTONIO State TX Zip 78269 TX Drycleaners cv 91 R 30.53962, -9717952 �011 This database returned 2 results for your area Texas Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 337, requires all dry cleaning drop stations and facilities in Texas to register with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and implement new performance standards at their facilities as appropriate. Environmental contamination at a dry cleaner site can occur from spills and leaks of solvent. The most common dry cleaning solvent can penetrate concrete and can sink through floor cracks since it is heavier then water. In addition, many dry cleaners historically disposed of wastes containing solvent by pouring wastewater into a sanitary sewer, throwing spent filters and sludge into the fresh, or dumping wastewater on the ground near their facility. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, a federal law passed in 1980 and amended in 1984 increased regulation of hazardous waste and unsafe practices are no longer allowed. However, at some dry cleaner facilities, past disposal and management practices have resulted in contamination of soil and groundwater to an extent that requires cleanup. TX Drycleaners Location 30.53881, -97.66868 Distance to site 4531 ft / 0.86 mi NE Site Name CLEENERZ Registration Number 105231963 Site Type FACILITY REGISTRATION Registration Status ACTIVE Site Operation ACTIVE Role Type OWN Address 1400 E OLD SETTLERS BLVD STE 300 County WILLIAMSON Owner Name M & K INDUSTRIES INC Fiscal Year FY2008 PhyslD 3004696 LGL ID 3021031 Address ROUND ROCK Address TX Address 2862 Zip Code 78664 Location 30.53881,-97.66868 Distance to site 4531 ft / 0.86 mi NE Site Name CLEENERZ Registration Number 105231963 Site Type FACILITY REGISTRATION Registration Status ACTIVE Site Operation ACTIVE Role Type BILLING Address 1400 E OLD SETTLERS BLVD STE 300 County WILLIAMSON Owner Name M & K INDUSTRIES INC Fiscal Year FY2008 PhyslD 3004696 LGL ID 3021031 Address ROUND ROCK Address TX Address 2862 Zip Code 78664 TX State Superfund Registry This database returned no results for your area. The State Superfund registry, established by the 69th Texas Legislature in 1985 and administered by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, lists those abandoned or inactive sites that have serious contamination but do not qualify for the federal program, and therefore are cleaned up under the state program. The stale must comply with federal guidelines in administering the state Superfund program, but EPA approval of state Superfund actions is not required. 7X Brownfieids This database returned no results for your area. Many former industhal properties lie dormant or underutilized due to liability associated with real or perceived contamination. These properties are broadly referred to as brownfelds. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), in Gose partnership with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other federal, state, and local redevelopment agencies, and stakeholders, is facilitating cleanup, transferability, and revitalization of brownfields through the development of regulatory, tax, and technical assistance tools. TX Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites This database returned no results for your area. The Texas Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) provides administrative, technical, and legal incentives to encourage the cleanup of contaminated sites in Texas. Since all non -responsible parties, including future lenders and landowners, receive pmtection from liability to the state of Texas for cleanup of sites under the VCP, most of the constraints for completing real estate transactions at those sites are eliminated. As a result, many unused or under used properties maybe restored to economically productive or community beneficial use. Also under the VCP, site cleanups follow a streamlined approach to reduce future human and environmental risk to safe levels. TX innocent Owner Program This database returned no results for your area. Texas instituted the Innocent Owner/Operator Progrem (IOP) to mitigate the risks of environmental contamination to innocent parties. The Texas IOP created by House giprovides a certificate ll 2776 of the 75th 'Or to an innocent owner or operator if their property is contaminated as a result of a release or migration of wntaminants from a source or sources not located on the property, and they did not cause or contribute to the source or sources of contamination. Like the Texas Voluntary Cproplemnuy Programgg (VCP), the IOP can be used as a redevelopment tool or as unlike the VCP value to a contaminst of liability, (OCs are not 2nsfere1 ble to In owners/operators rFutue iinnnote cent owners oer, operators are eligible to enter the IOP and may receive an IOC only after they become an owner or operator of the site. TX Landfills This database returned no results for your area. The Solid Waste Landfill ntained o Environmental Quality and consist f openn solid wadatabase isste disposal facilities rovided and and transfer Commission on nsfe statin s ROUND ROCK TEXAS PLANNING b DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT To whom it may concern: Mayor Alan McGraw Mayor Pro -Tem George White Councilmembers Craig Morgan Joe Clifford Will Peckham John Moman Kris Whafleld City Manager Laurie Hadley, lntedm City Attorney Stephan L. Sheets November 21, 2014 Be- Environmental Review Record for 2020 Heathwood Circle, Round Rocky Texas 78664;parce1R064384 There is no record of this property being occupied by any use other than a single-family residence. There is no reason to believe environmentally -sensitive or hazardous materials of any kind have been produced or stored on this property. The property was annexed into the City on April 27, 1978, along with the all other lots within its subdivision (Greenhill). Upon annexation it was zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential), which was the primary zoning district for single-family uses at the time. The R-1 district was later changed to become the SF -2 (Single Family — Standard Lot) district, which is the current standard single-family zoning district for the City of Round Rock. The structure was built in 1980 as a single family home, which it remains today. The source of this information is records kept by the City of Round Rock Planning and Development Services department. Please contact me at 512-671-2728 should you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bradley Dushkin, Senior Planner Planning and Development Services Department cc: Elizabeth Alvarado CITY OF ROUND ROCK 301 West Bagdad, Suite 210, Round Rock Texas 78564 Planning [P] 512.218.5428 • Code Enforcement [P] 512.341.3329 . [F] 512.218.3286 • roundrocktexes.gov d � �� n�w � - • fit• �. -�,�� ^ r �� Worksheet for Preparing 24 CFR §58.5 Statutory Checklist [Optional Tool] 1. §58.5(a) Historical Properties [36 CFR Part 8001 Historic Properties a. Does the project include the type of activity that would have the potential to affect historic properties such as acquisition, demolition, disposition, ground disturbance, new construction or rehabilitation? ® Yes ❑ No Project scope of work is minor home repair/rehab. If Yes, continue. If No, the project is not the type of activity that has the potential to affect historic properties. Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Do the RE and State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) have a Programmatic Agreement (PA) that does not require consultation for this type of activity? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes, document compliance with the PA. Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. C. Is the project located within or directly adjacent to a historic district? ❑ Yes ® No d. Is the structure or surrounding structures listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (e.g. greater than 45 years old)? ❑ Yes ® No Were any properties of historical, architectural, religious or cultural significance identified in the project's Area of Potential Effect (APE)? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes to any of the questions above, continue. If No to all of the questions above, the project will not affect historic properties. A concurrence from the SHPO that "no historic properties will be affected" is required. Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See letter from SHPO allowing project to See clearance from State Historic Preservation Office. 22 Have you consulted with the SHPO to determine whether the project will have "No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties?" ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, consultation with the SHPO is required. g. Does the SHPO concurrence letter received for this project require mitigation or have conditions? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. It. Have the SHPO and RE agreed on required mitigation or conditions? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, include mitigation requirements and/or conditions from the SHPO in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue with consultation until resolved. Historic properties of religious and cultural significance to tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations Does the project include the types of activities such as those listed below that have the potential to affect historic properties of religious and cultural significance to tribes? • Ground disturbance (digging); • New construction in undeveloped natural areas; • Incongruent visual changes — impairment of the vista or viewshed from an observation point in the natural landscape; • Incongruent audible changes — increase in noise levels above an acceptable standard in areas known for their quiet, contemplative experience; • Incongruent atmospheric changes — introduction of lights that create skyglow in an area with a dark night sky; • Work on a building with significant tribal association; • Transfer, lease or sale of a historic property of religious and cultural significance. ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, tribal consultation is not required. 23 j. Does HUD's Tribal Directory Assessment Tool indicate that tribes have an interest in the location where the project is sited? (hM?://egis.hud.gov/tdat/Tribal.woxl ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, contact federally recognized tribe(s) and invite consultation. Continue. If No, document the result in the ERR. Tribal consultation is not required. k. Did the tribe(s) respond that they want to be a consulting party? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, (no response within 30 days or responded that they do not wish to consult), document response or lack of response in ERR. Further consultation is not required. After consulting with the tribe(s) and discussing the project, were any properties of religious or cultural significance to the tribe(s) identified in the project's APE? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, notify tribe(s) and other consulting parties of your finding of "No Historic Properties Affected." Tribe(s) has 30 days to object to a finding. in. After consulting with the tribe(s), will the project have an adverse effect on properties of religious or cultural significance to the tribe(s)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, consult with tribe(s) and other consulting parties to resolve adverse effects, including considering alternatives and mitigation measures that would avoid or minimize adverse effects. If No, notify tribe(s) and other consulting parties of your finding of "No Adverse Effects." Tribe(s) has 30 days to object to a finding. n. Were any objections to a finding received from a consulting tribe? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue with consultation until resolved. If No, consultation is complete. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Correspondence with SHPO/THPO. How determination of "no potential to cause effects" to historic properties was made.) Information Resources: 24 National Register of Historic Places: bM://nrhy.focus.nps.gov/natregjiome.do?segpch==natregjiome National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers: ho://ncshoo.org/ Map of Currently Recognized THPO's: htW://www.nathoo.owmgp.html Historic Preservation HUD Guidance: httos://www.onecod.info/environmental-review/historic-preservation/ Historic Preservation Webinar: Section 106 Agreements Database: httos://www.onecpd.info/resource/3675/section-106-agreement-database/ 2. §58.5(6) (1) Floodplain Management [24 CFR Part 551 Does the project involve minor repairs or improvements on one to four family properties that do not meet the threshold for "substantial improvement" of §55.2(b)(8), i.e., the cost does not equal or exceed 50% of the market value of the structure before improvement or repair started, before damage occurred? ® Yes ❑ No Project is minor home repair. See FEMA map attached. b. Does the project involve the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of and accessibility to elderly and persons with disabilities? ❑ Yes ®No If Yes to a or b, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. C. Is the project located within (or have an impact on) a 100 year floodplain (Zone A) or Coastal High Hazard (Zone V) identified by FEMA maps? ❑ Yes ❑ No d. Does the project involve a "critical action," per §55.2(b) (2) (i), located within a 500 year floodplain (Zone B) identified by FEMA maps? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes to (b) or (c), follow HUD's Floodplain Management Regulations 8-Step/5- Step decision-making process of §55.20 to comply with 24 CFR Part 55. The 8- Step/5-Step decision-making process must show that there are no practicable alternatives to locating the project in the floodplain, and if there are no alternatives, define measures to mitigate impacts to floodplain and location of the project in the floodplain. Completion of the 8 -Step decision-making process must 25 be completed before the completion of an EA per §55.10(a). See Attachment 2 for an example of the 8 -Step decision-making process. The 8 -step decision-making process must be included in the ERR and summarized in Part 55 and Part 58 public notices, as well as NOMOF and FONSI notices. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No to (b) and (c), compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Does the project involve a critical action in a coastal high hazard area or a floodway? ❑ Yes ❑ No If, Yes, HUD assistance may not be used for this project. Does the project involve a non-critical action which is not a functionally dependent use that is located in a floodway? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, HUD assistance may not be used for this project g. Does the project involve a non-critical action which is not a functionally dependent use that is located in a coastal high hazard area? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, project is allowed only if it is designed for a location in a coastal high hazard area and is processed under Section 55.20. Design requirements must be noted in Statutory Checklist and 8 -Step decision-making process. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (FEMA flood map used to make this fording with the project location marked on the map. Include the community name, map panel number and date of map. As applicable, §55.20 8 -Step decision-making process analysis. If FEMA has not published the appropriate flood map, the RE must make a fording based on best available data.) For more information see: Floodplain Management HUD Guidance: https://www.opecpd.info/environmental-review/floodplain-managementl FEMA Map Service Center: htm://www.msc.fema.gov 3. §58.5(b) (2) Wetlands Protection (E.O. 11990) Does the project involve new construction, land use conversion, or substantial improvements as defined in 24CFR Part 55? ❑ Yes ® No Wetlands maps attached. If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. 26 b. Is the project within or adjacent to or will it affect wetlands, marshes, wet meadows, mud flats or natural ponds per field observation and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps issued by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) or, if not available, National Soil Surveys by National Resources Conservation Service (MRCS)? ❑ Yes ❑ No C. Are there drainage ways, streams, rivers, or coastlines on or near the site? ❑ Yes ❑ No d. Are there ponds, marshes, bogs, swamps or other wetlands on or near the site? ❑ Yes ❑ No e. Does the project involve new construction and/or filling located within a wetland designated on a USFWS National Wetlands Inventory map? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes to any of b — e above, comply with wetlands decision-making process of 24 CFR §55.20. (Use proposed Part 55 published in the Federal Register January 2012 for wetland procedures). Continue. If No to all of b - e above, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Will the project require a permit from the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or will USFWS require wetland mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, ensure this is noted in Part 55 and Part 58 public notices. Include all mitigation measures and permit requirements in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (NWI Map with project location noted in reference to wetlands. §55.20 8/5 -Step decision-making process analysis for new construction and/or filling, and any permits received.) For more information see: Wetlands Protection HUD Guidance: htWs://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/wetlmds-protection/ USFWS National Wetlands Inventory — Geospatial Wetlands Digital Data: http://www.FWS.Rov/wetlmds/data/index.html Recognizing wetlands: 27 http://www.usace.annv mil/Portals/2/docs/eivilworks/repulatory/techbio/rw broodf 4. §58.5(c) Coastal Zone Management ]Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, Sections 307(c) & (d)] a. Does the project involve new construction, land use conversion, or substantial improvements? ❑ Yes ® No Map of the Texas Coastal Zone Attached. If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is the project located within a Coastal Zone as defined in your state Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, the State CZM Agency must make a finding that the project is consistent with the approved State CZM Plan. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Map showing project in relation to the nearest Coastal Zone Management area. If applicable, State's findings.) For additional information see: Coastal Zone Management HUD Guidance: httys://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/coastal-zone-management/ States and Territories Working with NOAA on Ocean and Coastal Zone Management: http://coastalmanagemmt.nom. og y/mystate/welcome.html Texas Coastal Zone Management Program: Texas Coastal Zone Boundary: bM://www.glo.texas.lzov/what-we-do/cming-for-the-coast/ documents/landing-page folder/CoastalBoundarvMan.odf Louisiana Office of Coastal Management: htto://dm.louisian&gov/index.cfm?md=nagebuilder&tmn=home&pid=85&n ig d=5 Louisiana Coastal Zone Boundary: htW://dm.louisiana.gov/index.cf n?mdf�ta2ebuilder&tmo=home&t)id=88 5. §58.5(d). Sole Source Aquifers 140 CFR Part 1491 a. Does the project involve new construction or land use conversion? ❑ Yes ® No See documentation on nearest Sole Source Aquifer. 28 If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is the project located within a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - designated sole source aquifer watershed area per EPA Ground Water Office? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, consult with the Water Management Division of EPA to design mitigation measures to avoid contaminating the aquifer and implement appropriate mitigation measures. Include mitigation measures in mitigation section of Statutory Checklist. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Map showing project in relation to the nearest Sole Source Aquifer.) For more information see: Sole Source Aquifer HUD Guidance: httns://www.oneeN.info/environmental-review/sole-source-aquifers/ Region 6 Sole Source Aquifers: htto://www.gpa. og v/region6/water/swn/ssa/mal)s.ht n 6. §55.5(e) Endangered Species [50 CFR Part 4021 Does the project involve the type of activities that are likely to have "no effect on endangered species, such as: • Demolition and construction or placement of a single family residence within a developed lot, and/or any loans or mortgages affiliated with such construction, demolition or placement provided they are not within 750 feet of habitat for federally -listed species or 300 feet of mapped wetlands, wildlife refuges, fish hatcheries, wildlife management areas, or related significant fish and wildlife resources? ❑ Yes ® No • Rehabilitation or renovation activities associated with existing structures (e.g., houses, buildings), including additional structures attached to or associated with the primary structure, and/or any loans or mortgages affiliated with such rehabilitation or renovation? ® Yes ❑ No • Acquisition of existing structures (e.g., houses, buildings), including additional structures attached to or associated with the primary structure, and/or any loans or mortgages affiliated with such acquisition. ❑ Yes ® No • Purchase and placement of playground equipment within existing parks? ❑ Yes 0 No • Resurfacing, repairing, or maintaining existing streets, sidewalks, curbs, trails, parking lots and/or any other existing paved surfaces where additional ground disturbance, outside of the existing surface is not necessary? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes to any of the above, the project is likely to have "No Effect' on federally protected species and critical habitat. Informal consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service (Services) is not necessary. The RE is required to make this finding and include a memorandum to the file supporting the finding (note that this finding should be made by the RE, and not by third party contractors and non -RE grant recipients). Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See memo from CDBG staff and Critical Habitat Map. If No to all of the above, continue. b. Has the US Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Services identified listed species or designated critical habitat in the county where the project is located? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, the project is likely to have "No Effect' on federally protected species and critical habitat. Informal consultation with the Services is not necessary. The RE is required to make this finding and include a memorandum to the file supporting the finding (note that this finding should be made by the RE, and not by third party contractors). Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Is the project located within 750 feet of habitat for federally -listed species or 300 feet of mapped wetlands, wildlife refuges, fish hatcheries, wildlife management areas, or related significant fish and wildlife resources? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, conduct special studies by a qualified professional to determine whether the project may affect the species or habitat to support a May Effect finding. If No, continue below d. Does the project constitute a major construction activity (a major Federal action that modifies the physical environment and would normally require the preparation of an EIS)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30 If Yes, formal consultation with the Services is required in accordance with procedural regulations contained in 50 CFR Part 402. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. C. If federally protected species or critical habitat have been identified within the project area, has a special study been conducted by a qualified professional to determine the effects of the project on each species and critical habitat? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, a special study should be conducted to determine the effects of the project on federally protected species and critical habitat. Continue. Has the RE made a determination based on professional findings that the project is "Not Likely to Adversely Affect" any federally protected (listed or proposed) threatened or endangered species (i.e., plants or animals, fish, or invertebrates), nor adversely modify critical habitats? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, Service's concurrence with findings is required. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. g. Has the RE determined based on professional findings that the project "May Affect" federally protected (listed or proposed) threatened or endangered species (i.e., plants or animals, fish, or invertebrates), or adversely modify critical habitats? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, formal consultation is required with the Services, in accordance with procedural regulations contained in 50 CFR Part 402, which mandates formal consultation in order to preserve the species. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, contact your FED for assistance in determining impacts to federally protected species and critical habitat. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Memorandum to the file by the RE supporting the finding of "No Effect." Concurrence memo from one or both of the Services for a finding of "Not Likely to Adversely Affect." Biological Opinion from one or both of the Services for a finding of "May Affect.") For additional information see: (The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. as amended: particularly Section 7 (b) and (c). 50 CFR 402). ESA HUD Guidance: 31 https://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/endangered-species/ ESA HUD Webinar: hUs://www oneci)d.info/leaniine-center/environmental-review-training/#Protecting our Natural Resources USFWS ESA Species Search: http://www.FWS.goy/endmp,ered/sl)ecies/index.html NMFS ESA Species Search: htto://www.mnfs.noaa.goy/tn/smies/esa/ USFWS Critical Habitat Maps: htto://crithab. F W S. eov/ NMFS Critical Habitat Maps: htto://www.nTnfs.noaa.gov/pr/scecies/criticalhabitat.htm Endangered Species Consultation Handbook: http://wwwnmfs.noaa.gov/pr/t)dfs/laws/esa section? handbook.pdf 7. §58.5(f) Wild and Scenic Rivera [36 CFR Part 2971 a. Does the project involve new construction, land use conversion, or substantial improvements? ❑ Yes® No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mork box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See map of project site and nearest Wild and Scenic River and How Far Is It? information on distance to nearest Wild and Scenic River. b. Is the project is located within one (1) mile of a designated Wild & Scenic River, or river being studied as a potential component of the Wild & Scenic River system or an inventory river? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, determination from the National Park Service (NPS) must be obtained, with a fording that the project will not have a direct and adverse effect on the river nor invade or diminish values associated with such rivers. For NRI Rivers, consultation with NPS is recommended to identify and eliminate direct and adverse effects. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Maps noting project location and showing proximity to protected rivers. Relevant determinations or results of consultation) For further information see: 32 Wild and Scenic Rivers HUD Guidance: haps,//www onecod info/environmental-review/wild-and-scenic-rivers/ HUD Wild and Scenic Rivers Webinar: Vis•//www onecyd info/leaming-center/environmental-review-training/#Protecting our Natural Resources National Park Service: Designated Rivers httv,//www.rivers.gov/man.php Study Rivers htto•//www.riyers.goy/studv.uhp National River Inventory (NRI) listed rivers: htti)://www.nl)s.gov/nerg/Srotzrams/rtca/nri/index.html 8. §58.5(8) Air Quality 140 CFR Parts 6, 51, 61 and 931 a. Does the project involve demolition or renovation of buildings likely to contain asbestos containing materials? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes, ensure the project is in compliance with EPA's Asbestos regulations found at 40 CFR Part 61 (NESHAP) and all State and local regulations. Continue below. If No, continue. b. Does the project require and environmental assessment or environmental impact statement? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes, continue. if No, compliance with CAA State Implementation Plan factor is complete. Mark Box A on the Statutory checklist. Project she is located in Williamson County which is a not a non attainment area. Does the project involve five or more dwelling units, acquisition of undeveloped land, a change of land use, demolition, major rehabilitation, or new construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. d. Is the project located in a Non -Attainment area? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. 33 C. Has EPA or the State provided a written determination that the project will not exceed any of the de minimis emissions levels of all non -attainment and maintenance level pollutants or exceed the screening level established by the state or air quality management district? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Did EPA or the State provide a Letter of Consistency with the State Implementation Plan (SIP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yea, obtain letter of consistency showing that the project is consistent with the SIP. Compliance is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. g. Has EPA determined that the proposed activity is one that requires a permit under the SIP? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance is complete. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. h. Can project be brought into compliance through mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, list mitigation measures required to achieve conformance with SIP in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, Federal assistance may not be used at this location. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Letter of consistency with SIP, assessment of emissions, air permits received, mitigation measures taken, etc.) For further information see: Air Quality HUD Guidance: https://www.oneci)d.info/environinental-review/air-qualitv HUD Air Quality Webmar: 34 haps•//www onecnd info/leamin¢-center/environmental-review-training/#Clean Air Act Compliance The Green Book Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants: htto://www.epa.2oy/oar/oaaos/greenbk/ Region 6 Air State Implementation Plans: http://www.co.2ov/revion6/6v&air/pd-Vsip. 9. §58.5(h) Farmlands Protection [7 CFR Part 658)] Does the project involve acquisition of undeveloped land, conversion of undeveloped land, new construction or site clearance? ❑ Yes ® No See zoning map. If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is project located in an area zoned to urban and/or residential uses as mapped by the Census Bureau? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. C. Does the project site include prime or unique farmland, or other farmland of statewide or local importance as identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) (formerly the Soil Conservation Service? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, request evaluation of land type from the NRCS using Form AD -1006, and consider the resulting rating in deciding whether to approve the proposal, as well as mitigation measures (including measures to prevent adverse effects on adjacent farmlands). Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Include mitigation measures in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Zoning map with project location noted. Form AD -1006 from NRCS.) For additional information see: NRCS Soil Maps: 35 http://websoilsurvey.nres-usda.gov/app/ Form AD -1006 and instructions: htto,//www.nrcs.usda.gov/intemetIFSE DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1045394.odf Farmland Protection HUD Guidance: https,//www onecpd info/environmental-review/farmlands-protection HUD FPPA Webinar: https�//www onecpd info/leaniing_ -center/environmental-review-training/#Protecting our Natural Resources Census Data Mapper: ho://tigerweb.geo.census.gov/datamavt)er/may.html 10. §58.5(1) (1) Noise Abatement and Control 124 CFR Part 51111 a. Does the project involve a noise sensitive use such as a residential structure, school, hospital, nursing home, library, etc.? ® Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is the project located within: • 15 miles of a civilian or military airfield with more than 9,000 carver operations annually; ❑ Yes ® No • 1000 feet of a major highway or busy road; ❑ Yes ® No within 3000 feet of a railroad. ❑ Yes ® No If Yes to any the above, complete a noise calculation assessment. Use adopted DNL contours if the noise source is an airport Continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See map showing distance from project site to nearest railroad and major roadway. C. Do noise calculations or airport noise contour maps indicate noise levels above 65dB (outside)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If Yes, continue. d. If the answer to "c" above is `yes," does the project involve rehabilitation? ❑ Yes ❑ No go If Yes, noise attenuation measures are strongly encouraged for rehabilitation new construction to reduce noise levels to below 65dB. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. List all attenuation measures in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, continue. d. If the answer to "c" is yes, does the project involve new construction? ❑ Yes ❑No If Yes, Special Environmental Clearance is required (an Environmental Assessment). Noise attenuation measures are required for new construction to reduce noise levels to below 65dB. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. List all attenuation measures in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, Continue. e. Do noise calculations or airport noise contour maps indicate outdoor noise levels above 75dB? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance is completed with respect to steps ad above. f. If noise levels are above 75 dB, does the project involve new construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, HUD assistance for the construction of new noise sensitive uses is generally prohibited for projects with unacceptable noise exposure (>750). An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required. Compliance cannot be achieved without either completion of an EIS or processing of an EIS waiver. If No, compliance in complete with respect to steps ac above. g. If outdoor noise levels are > 75 dB and the project involves new construction, was an EIS waiver processed? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance is complete. Attach the EIS waiver, signed by the Certifying Officer. Mark box `B" of the Statutory Checklist and list all outdoor and indoor attenuation measures to reduce outdoor noise levels to 65 dB and indoor noise levels to 45 dB in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, proceed with preparation of an EIS or deny the project. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Maps with project location indicating distance from noise sources. DNL calculations and/or NAG worksheets.) 37 For more information see: IND Noise Guidance: https •//www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/noise-abatement-and-control/ htti)�//www.hud.jzov/offices/co&environinent/dnlcalculator.cfin n http�//www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/envirorunent/mitigation.c htt�://portal.hud. aov/hudstracat/noiseCalcEntrv.i sp HUD Noise Webinar: https•//www onecpd info/learning-center/environmental-review-training/#Noise Assessment Training FAA: htto://www.faa.eov/aimorts/planning capacity/npias/reports/ Airport Contacts: http://www.aimay.com/airi)orts/ 11. §58.5(1) (1) Explosive and Flammable Operations 124 CFR 51C] a. Does the project involve development, construction, rehabilitation, modernization or land use conversion of a property intended for residential, institutional, recreational, commercial, or industrial use? ® Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Was a field observation performed by a qualified professional which documents there are above ground storage tanks within line of site of the project? ❑ Yes ® No C. Is the project site within 1 mile of current or planned stationary aboveground storage tanks of more than 100 gallon capacity, containing common liquid industrial fuels OR of any capacity, containing hazardous liquids or gases, that are not liauid industrial fuels? ❑ Yes ® No d. Are industrial facilities handling explosive or fire -prone materials such as liquid propane, gasoline or other storage tanks adjacent to or visible from the project site? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes to any of b — d above, use HUD Hazards Guide to calculate an Acceptable Separation Distance to comply with 24 CFR Part 51, Subpart C. Continue. It No to all of b — d above, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See email from Laura Myers HUD Rep. 38 e. Is the project located at an Acceptable Separation Distance from any above- ground explosive or flammable fuels or chemicals containers as calculated above? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. Can mitigation measures, such as construction of a barrier of adequate size and strength, reduce the blast overpressure or thermal radiation hazard to protect the project (per 24 CFR §51.205)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. List all mitigation measures in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, HUD assistance cannot be used for this project. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Maps with project location noted showing distance from explosives and flammable operations. ASD calculations/worksheet.) For additional information see: HUD Guidance on Siting Projects near Explosive and Flammable Facilities: HUD Explosives Webinar: httt)s•//www onecpd info/leaming-center/environmental-review-trainine/#Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) Training Acceptable Separation Distance Guidebook: https://www.onecl)d.info/resource/2762/accoigble- separation4stance-guidebook/ Barrier Design Guidance for HUD Assisted Project Near Hazardous Facilities: httt)s•//www onecpd info/resource/2763/barrier-desim-guidance-for-hud-assisted-prgects-near- hazardous-facil/ 12. §58.5(1) (1) Airport Hazards [24 CFR 51D] a. Will the project use HUD assistance, subsidy or insurance for construction; land development; community development or redevelopment; substantial modernization and rehabilitation which prolongs the physical or economic life of existing facilities; provide facilities and services which make land available for construction; change the use of a facility; increase the unit density or number of people at the site? ❑ Yes ® No Project scope of work does not meet definition of substantial improvements or rehab. See list of nearest military and civilian airports. If Yes, continue. M If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is the property within 5,000 feet of a civilian airport, the Runway Clear Zone (RCZ)? ❑ Yes ❑ No C. Is the project is within 15,000 feet of a military airfield, the Clear Zone (CZ) or Accident Potential Zone (APZ)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No to both of the above questions, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. d. If the project is within 5, 000 feet of the end of a civilian airport runway, did the Airport Operator provide a written determination that the project is not now and will not be 10 years from now, located 2,500 feet from the end of the civilian runway in a runway clear zone? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance is complete. Mark Box "A" on the Statutory Checklist and attach the Airport Operator's written determination. If No, continue. C. If the project is within 15,000 feet of a military airfield did the airfield operator provide a written determination that the project is not currently located in an CZ/APZ and future expansion will not place the property in a CZ/APZ? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance is complete. Mark Box "A" on the Statutory Checklist and attach the Airport Operator's written determination. If No, continue. d. If the project is or will be in a RCZ/CZ will the project be frequently used or occupied by people? ❑ Yes ❑No If Yes, HUD funds may not be used for this project. M If No, continue. If the project will not frequently be used by people, has the airport operator provided a written statement that there are no plans to purchase the land involved with such facilities as part of an RCZ/CZ acquisition program? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, attach copy of written assurance from airport operator. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, HUD funds may not be used for this project. If the project is located in a military airfield APZ, is the project consistent with the Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Accident Potential Zones (32 CFR Part 256, DOD Instruction 4165.57). ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, attach copy of written assurance from airport operator. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, HUD funds may not be used for this project. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Map with project location noted showing the distance from civilian airports and/or military airfields. Written confirmation from airport operating stating whether or not project is located in a RCZ, CZ or APZ. Written assurance from airport operator on purchase of property.) For further information see: Airport Information: hW://www.aimay.com/airoorts/ Airport Hazards HUD Guidance: httys://www.onecpd.info/enviromnental-review/aiiport-hazud 41 13. §58.5(1) (2) Contamination and Toxic Substances Government Records Search Is the property located within the search distances of any of the types of environmental contamination sources? If the project is located within any of the minimum search distances above, then the RE most further evaluate to determine if there has been a release or there is a threat of release to the subject property. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review to support any conclusion that the site of concern is not a threat. 42 ASTM 1527-13 Recommended Minimum Search Standard Environmental Record Sources Distance(mi) Yea No Federal Delisted NPL Site List 0.5 ❑ Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS List 0.5 Federal CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned RAP Site List 0.5 ❑ Federal RCRA Non-CORRACTS Treatment, Storage and Disposal TSD Facilities List 0.5 State- and Tribal- 'valent CERCLIS 0.5 State and Tribal Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal Site Lists 0.5 State and Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Lists 0.5 ❑ State and Tribal VoLimma Cleanup Sites 0.5 ❑ State and Trial Brownfield Sites 0.5 ❑ Federal National Priorities List L I Federal RCRA Correction Action (CORRACTS) Facilities List 1 ❑ State- and Tribal -Equivalent NPL 1 Federal Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registries Property Only State and Tribal Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registries Property Only Federal Emergency Response and Notification System(ERNS) List Property Onl ❑ Property/Adjoining Federal RCRA Generators List Properties Property/Adjoining State and Tribal Registered Storage Tank Lists Properties El If the project is located within any of the minimum search distances above, then the RE most further evaluate to determine if there has been a release or there is a threat of release to the subject property. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review to support any conclusion that the site of concern is not a threat. 42 If a release or threat of release cannot be ruled out, then services of a qualified environmental professional is necessary to further evaluate potential for site contamination. Recommend an ASTM 1527-13 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I). Prior Uses of the Property b. Has the subject property, adjacent property, or adjoining property ever been used for any of the following types of uses? If the evaluation of previous uses results in a yes answer to any of the above, the services of a qualified environmental professional is necessary to Wile out site contamination. An ASTM 1527-13 Phase I is recommended. If the evaluation of previous uses does not identify previous uses of concern, attach supporting documentation for the conclusion to the environmental review. Field Site Visit C. Did a visual inspection of the site show the following? Yes No Distressed vegetation Yes No Gas station ❑ Vehicle Repair Shop Cm Dealership El 0 Auto Garage Depot ❑ ® Commercial Printing Fuility Industrial or commercial warehouses ❑ ® Cleaners ❑ Photo Developing Laboratory ❑ ® Hospital ❑ Junkyard or landfill I Agricultuml/Famung Ormagons T—M ❑ ® Livestock 'ons 1 ❑ If the evaluation of previous uses results in a yes answer to any of the above, the services of a qualified environmental professional is necessary to Wile out site contamination. An ASTM 1527-13 Phase I is recommended. If the evaluation of previous uses does not identify previous uses of concern, attach supporting documentation for the conclusion to the environmental review. Field Site Visit C. Did a visual inspection of the site show the following? 43 Yes No Distressed vegetation ❑ Vent or Fill Pipes ❑ Storage Oil Tanks or Questionable Containers Pits, Ponds or Lagoons El 0 Stained Soil or Pavement other than water stains Pungent, Foul or Noxious Odors ❑ 43 d. Does the project have an underground storage tank other than a residential fuel tank, or known or suspected to be contaminated by toxic chemicals or radioactive materials? ❑ Yes ® No Is the project site near an industry or commercial facility disposing of chemicals or hazardous wastes? ❑ Yes ® No Could a nearby source of toxic, hazardous or radioactive substances affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property? ❑ Yes or ® No If the site visit identifies a "Yes" answer to any of the above, a qualified environmental professional must undertake investigations necessary to ensure that the project is free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances such that there is no hazard which could affect the health and safety of occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. Continue. Results of ASTM Site Contamination Reviews g. Was an ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report completed for this project? (Strongly recommend an Phase I ESA for land acquisition, new construction, reconstruction or substantial rehabilitation). ❑ Yes ❑ No h. Did a Phase I, or equivalent evaluation, identify the potential for site contamination? [The RE must independently evaluate the Phase I and not rely entirely on the conclusions of whether or not there is a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC). Phase I's do not always appropriately identify RECs] ❑ Yes ❑ No If there is the potential for site contamination, was an ASTM Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Completed that documented contamination? ❑ Yes or ❑ No 44 Yes No Dumped Material or Soil, Mounds of Dirt, Rubble, Fill, etc. 1 ❑ d. Does the project have an underground storage tank other than a residential fuel tank, or known or suspected to be contaminated by toxic chemicals or radioactive materials? ❑ Yes ® No Is the project site near an industry or commercial facility disposing of chemicals or hazardous wastes? ❑ Yes ® No Could a nearby source of toxic, hazardous or radioactive substances affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property? ❑ Yes or ® No If the site visit identifies a "Yes" answer to any of the above, a qualified environmental professional must undertake investigations necessary to ensure that the project is free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances such that there is no hazard which could affect the health and safety of occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. Continue. Results of ASTM Site Contamination Reviews g. Was an ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report completed for this project? (Strongly recommend an Phase I ESA for land acquisition, new construction, reconstruction or substantial rehabilitation). ❑ Yes ❑ No h. Did a Phase I, or equivalent evaluation, identify the potential for site contamination? [The RE must independently evaluate the Phase I and not rely entirely on the conclusions of whether or not there is a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC). Phase I's do not always appropriately identify RECs] ❑ Yes ❑ No If there is the potential for site contamination, was an ASTM Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Completed that documented contamination? ❑ Yes or ❑ No 44 Did results of the Phase I or Phase II identify the need to mitigate the environmental condition by removing, stabilizing or encapsulating the toxic substances in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate Federal, state or local oversight agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No It. if the project site requires remediation, does the RE have the following documentation? If Yes, then, compliance is complete. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review. Ensure that all mitigation measures are identified in the environmental review and that there is a mechanism for conveying requirements in agreements and awards. Mark Box B on the Statutory Checklist for this Authority. Attach all supporting documentation. If No, HUD cannot provide assistance for the project at this site. j. If the site requires remediation, and the property owner intends to complete the remediation prior to transferring the property to the HUD recipient, can the RE provide documentation of the following? Yes No Remediation Plan EJ Regulatory Oversight Agency Approval of the Remediation Plan Firm Cost Estimate to Implement the Remediation Plan ❑ ❑ A Secured Source of Funding for Site Remediation ❑ A project condition that the project construction or rehabilitation cannot proceed until the RE received a No Further Action (NFA) ❑ ❑ Required or Site Closure Letter from the Regulatory Oversight Agency A project condition for Deed Restrictions related to any continuing obligations associated with the remediation plan or ❑ ❑ NFA or Site Closure Letters If Yes, then, compliance is complete. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review. Ensure that all mitigation measures are identified in the environmental review and that there is a mechanism for conveying requirements in agreements and awards. Mark Box B on the Statutory Checklist for this Authority. Attach all supporting documentation. If No, HUD cannot provide assistance for the project at this site. j. If the site requires remediation, and the property owner intends to complete the remediation prior to transferring the property to the HUD recipient, can the RE provide documentation of the following? If Yes, then, compliance is complete. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review. Ensure that all mitigation measures are identified in the environmental review and that there is a mechanism for conveying requirements in agreements and awards. Mark Box B on the Statutory Checklist for this Authority. Attach all supporting documentation. 45 Yes No Remediation Plan Regulatory Oversight Agency Approval of the Remediation Plan Purchase contract and closing document requirements for receipt of a No Further Action Required or Site Closure Letter from the Regulatory Oversight Agency rim to closing. ❑ ❑ Deed restrictions for any continuing obligations associated with the remediation plan or NFA or Site Closure Letters ❑ If Yes, then, compliance is complete. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review. Ensure that all mitigation measures are identified in the environmental review and that there is a mechanism for conveying requirements in agreements and awards. Mark Box B on the Statutory Checklist for this Authority. Attach all supporting documentation. 45 If No, HUD cannot provide assistance for the project at this site. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Maps showing project distance to contaminated sites. Phase I (ASTM) Report. All ESAs and mitigation plans performed for this project.) For additional information see: HUD Site Contamination Webinar: https�//www onecnd info/leaminw,-center/environmental-review-training/#Evaluating Site Contamination HUD Guidance on Site Contamination: httns://www.onecud info/environmental-review/site-contamination/ NEPAssist httvi//nepassisttool.epa.gov/nel)assist/entry.asp EPA Envirofacts Data: http://www.eya.gov/enviro/ EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI): httn://www.ei)a.gov/envirolhtmYtoxic releases.html EPA Maps: http://www.el)a.gov/cmefdata/m4ef.home EPA CERCLIS/NPL — Superfund database: httn://www.ema.gov/superftmd/sites/guerv/basic.htm ATSDR "ToxFAQs" summaries about hazardous substances: htti)://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxWs/index.asp Right -To -Know Network: httn://www.rtlmet.org/ 14. §58.5(j) Environmental Justice (E.O.12898) a. Is the project located in or designed to serve a predominantly minority and low- income neighborhood? ❑ Yes ® No See low to moderate income area map attached. If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Would there be an adverse environmental impact caused by the proposed action, or would the proposed action be subject to an existing adverse environmental impact? ❑ Yes ❑ No If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If Yes, perform an Environmental Justice (EJ) analysis using census, geographic and other data to determine if a low-income/minority population is disproportionately impacted. Continue. 46 C. Will the adverse environmental impact of the proposed action disproportionately impact minority and low-income populations relative to the community -at -large? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, Mitigation or avoidance of adverse impacts must be considered to the extent practicable; and, public participation processes must involve the affected population(s) in the decision-making process. Continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Document the determination of no disproportionate impacts. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. d. Has the mitigation plan been approved by the RE and the impacted community? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. Include mitigation plan in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, Project cannot move forward until EJ issue is mitigated to the satisfactory of the RE and impacted community. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Mapping of low-income and minority populations in the vicinity of the project site. EJ analysis. Mitigation Plan.) For additional information see: EJ HUD Guidance: https•//www onecpd info/environmental-review/environmental justice/ HUD EJ Webmar: https•//www onecnd info/leaming-center/environmental-review-trainina/#Environmental Justice at HUD EJ maps & analysis, by location: htto://www.score=d.ore/community/ei-index.tcl EPA's "EJ View" Tool provides information relevant to EJ assessments: hM://cpmai)14.et)a.gov/eimap/entry.htmi Census data and maps also avail -able at: https//factfinder2.census.2ov/fams/mv/4sf/pages/index.xhtml Tract -level data on race & income: http://www.fficc.gov/y, ocode 15. Summary of Mitigation Measures: (Required for Incorporation into Project Design, included in Public Notices, and included as requirements of contracts, grants, loans, etc. Ensure final measures are included in Project Description Section of 7015.15.) 47 16. References: (List the Federal, State, or local agencies contacted to obtain their existing environmental reports and other data used for the environmental review of the proposed project.) 17. List of Major Reports Obtained: (Attach report(s), such as wetlands delineation studies, biological evaluations or habitat assessments, Phase I and II environmental site assessments.) 18. List of Preparers and Summary of Qualifications: Elizabeth Alvarado, CDBG Coordinator 48