The URL can be used to link to this page

CM-2014-612 - 12/5/2014City of Round Rock ins°OpOp` Agenda Item Summary Agenda Number: Title: Consider executing the Categorical Exlcusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a) (3) (j), Statutory Checklist, Compliance Checklist and an Environmental Review Worksheet for the CDBG 2014-2015 Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair Program for the property at 3606 Meadow Park Drive. Type: City Manager Item Governing Body: City Manager Approval Agenda Date: 12/5/2014 Dept Director: Lorje Lankford, Interim Finance Director Cost: Indexes: Attachments: stat checklist and backup part 1.pdf, stat checklist backup part 2.pdf, stat checklist back up part 3.pdf, compliance checklist with backup 3606 MPD.pdf, cat excluded subject to 3606 meadow park drive.pdf, stat checklist worksheet.pdf Department: Finance Department Text of Legislative File CM -2014-612 HUD requires that every CDBG project file contain a written record of the environmental review undertaken for each project which is termed the Environmental Review Record (ERR). The ERR shall be available for public review and must contain all of the recommended formats. The ERR must contain all of the environmental review documents, public notices, written determination and any environmental review findings pertaining to the decision making and actions related to individual project. The CDBG Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair project required that a Categorical Exclusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a)(i), Statutory Checklist, Compliance Checklist and a Statutory Checklist Worksheet be conducted and executed by the Certifying Officer. Staff recommends approval. ClryofRoul Reck P.,r PMW on 1/N014 LEGAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FOR CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER ACTION Required for Submission of ALL City Council and City Manager Items Department Name: Finance Project Name: Habitat- Affordable Homo Repair Project Mgr/Resource: WNws do ContractorNendor: Council Action: ORDINANCE r-1 RESOLUTION QCity Manager Approval 7 Attorney CMA Wording Consider executing Compliance Checklist and Categorical Exclusion for Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair Project for minor repairs at 3606 Meadow Park Drive, 01M O:\wdox\SCClnts\0179\14001MUNICIPAL\00316395.XLS Updated 6/3/08 ROUND ROCK. TIXAS wRrrosE. vwsswn MwmRn, CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TX 78664 Categorical Exclusion Subject to §58.5 Determination for Activities Listed at 24 CFR §58.35] aa) Chant Recipient: Habitat for Humanity of Williamson County Project Name: Affordable Home Repair Project Description (include all actions which are either geographically or functionally related): Location: Funding Source: CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA EDI Caoiml Fort d Operating Subsidy Hoce VI Other Estimated Funding Amount $10.000 Gram Number: B -14 -MC -48-0514 I have reviewed and determined that the above mentioned project is a Categorically Excluded activity (subject to §58.5) per 24 CFR §58.35(a) as follows: 15 0_�,A-70H- U12, 58.35(a) (1). Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements (other than buildings) when the facilities and improvements are in place and will be ❑ retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent (e.g., replacement of water or sewer lines, reconstruction of cubs and sidewalks, repaving of streets); 58.35(a) (2). Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the ❑ mobility of and accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons; 58.35(a) (3). Rehabilitation of buildings and improvements when the following conditions are met: 58.35(a) (3) (f.)ln the case of a building for residential use (with one to fou units), the density is not ® increased beyond fou units, the land use is not changed, and the footprint of the building is not increased in a floodplain or in a wetland; 58.35(a) (3) (if. In the case of multifamily residential buildings: (A) Unit density is not changed more than 20 percent; (B) The project does not involve changes in land use from residential to non-residential; ❑ and (C) The estimated cost of rehabilitation is less than 75 percent of the total estimated cost of replacement after rehabilitation. 58.35(a) (3) (iii). In the case of non-residential structures, including commercial, industrial, and public buildings: ❑ (A) The facilities and improvements are in place and will not be changed in size or capacity by more than 20 percent; AND (B) The activity does not involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to industrial, or from one industrial use to another. 58.35(a) (4) (i) An individual action on up to fou dwelling units where there is a maximum of fou units ❑ on any one site. The units can be four one -unit buildings or one fou -unit building or any combination in between; or 15 0_�,A-70H- U12, The responsible entity must also complete and attach a §59.5 Statutory Checklist and Worksheet and a §58.6 Compliance Checklist. By signing below the Responsible Entity officially determines in writing that all activities covered by this determination are Categorically Excluded (subject on §58.5) and meets the conditions specified for such exclusion under section 24 CFR §58.35(a). This document must be maintained in the ERR. AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: a Laurie Hadley Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) 16 Date Interim City Munster Title (printed) 58.35(a x (ii) An individual action on a project of five or more housing units developed on scattered sites when the sites are more than 2,000 feet apart and them are not more than four housing units on my one ❑ site. 58.35(a) (iii) Paragraphs (a) (4) (i) and (ii) of this section do not apply to rehabilitation of a building for residential use (with one to four units) (see paragraph (a) (3) (1) of this section). 58.35(a) (5). Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, or equity loans on an existing structure, or El acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided that the structure, or land acquired, financed, or disposed of will be retained for the same use. LJ 58.35(a) (6). Combinations of the above activities. The responsible entity must also complete and attach a §59.5 Statutory Checklist and Worksheet and a §58.6 Compliance Checklist. By signing below the Responsible Entity officially determines in writing that all activities covered by this determination are Categorically Excluded (subject on §58.5) and meets the conditions specified for such exclusion under section 24 CFR §58.35(a). This document must be maintained in the ERR. AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: a Laurie Hadley Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) 16 Date Interim City Munster Title (printed) --ROUND R( TEXAS ruarose. a�ss,ma raosrram CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TX 78664 Compliance Checklist for 24 CFR §58.6, Other Requirements Complete for all projects, including Exempt (§58.34), Categorically Excluded Subject to §58.5 [§5835(a)], Categorically Excluded Not Subject to §58.5[§58.35(6)], and Projects Requiring Environmental Assessments (§58.36). Must be completed for each individual property address included within the project description. Project Name: Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair Program 3606 Meadow Park Drive ERR FILE # 1. §58.6(a) and (b) Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended; National Flood Insurance Reform AM of 1994 a. Does the project involve: Formula grants made to states, State-owned properly, small loans ($5,000 or less), assisted leasing that is not used for repairs, improvements, or acquisition? ❑ Yes ®No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. If No, continue. b. Is the project located in a FEMA identified Special Flood Hazard Ares? ❑ Yes ® No Project is located in FEMA map #48491C0495E Dated 9/26/08 If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, continue. Is the community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (or has less than one year passed since FEMA notification of Special Flood Hazards)? ❑ Yes ❑No If Yes, Flood Insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program must be obtained. If HUD assistance is provided as a grant, insurance must be maintained for the economic life of the project and in the amount of the total project cost (or up to the maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). If HUD assistance is provided as a loan, insurance most be maintained for the term of the loan and in the amount of the loan (or up to maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). A copy of the flood insurance policy declaration must be kept on file in the ERR. U No, Federal assistance may not be used in the Special Flood Hazards Area. Cite and attach source documentation: (Documentation should include a FEMA Flood Map showing project location in reference to flood zone designation. If flood map is not available, use best available information.) For additional information see: HUD Guidance on Flood Insurance: https://www.oneco.info/endno=ental-review/flood-insurance/ FEMA Map Service Center: htm://www.mse.fema.gov NFEP Community Status Book: www.fema.gov/f:ma/csb.shtm 3l) 2. §58.6(c) Coastal Barrier Improvement Act, as amended by the Coastal Barriers Improvement AM of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3501) a. Does the project involve new construction, conversion of land uses, major rehabilitation of existing structure, or acquisition of undeveloped land? ❑ Yes ® No Map of Texas Coast attached. this project is minor home repair If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, continue below. b. Is the project located in a coastal barrier resource area? ❑ Yes ❑No If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, Federal assistance may not be used in such an area. Cite and attach source documentation: (Documentation should include map (e.g. Google Earth) noting project distance from Coastal Barrier Resources.) For more information see: CBRS HUD Guidance: bM,//www.onmpd.info/envirommtal-revim/Coastal-barrier-msources/ CBRA mapper: httv://wim.usizs.gov/cbrmgpper/ebrmal)ver.html 3. §58.6(d) Runway Clear Zones and Clear Zones [24 CFR §51.303(a) (3)] a. Does the project involve the sale or purchase of existing property? Yes ❑No® If No, compliance with this section is complete. If yes, continue below. b. Is the project located within 2,500 feet of the end of a civil airport runway (Civil Airport's Runway Clear Zone) or within 15,000 feet of the end of a military runway (Military Airfield's Clem Zone)? Yes ❑ No ® Documentation showing distance to nearest airports attached. If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, Notice must be provided to buyer. The notice must advise the buyer that the property is in a Runway Clem Zone or Clear Zone, what the implications of such a location are, and that there is a possibility that the property may, at a later date, be acquired by the airport operator. The buyer must sign a statement acknowledging receipt of this information, and a copy of the signed notice must be maintained in this ERR. Cite and attach source document (Map indicating project she in proximity to end of runway): For more information we: Airport Information: htto://www.aimay.cotn/airports/ HUD Airport Hazards Guidance: haps://www.onecod.info/environmental-review/airport-hazards/ Notice to Prospective Buyers: httos://www.onmpd.info/mome/2758/notice-pmsvmtive-buvers- orooerties-in-runwavolear-zones/ AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL Authorized Responsible Entity S' tune Date Laurie Hadley Interim City Manager Authorized Responsible Entity Nettie (printed) Tide (printed) 51 CITY OF ROUND ROCK CDBG 2014 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AFFORDABLE HOME REPAIR PROGRAM LQ_ FIRM naoowuuxc�n�reYu WILLLIHiON LtlLtlIY. TE%,1tl xniwrwnL.m,�.r.. I/I6WY111 W W�1 MIOW WM animas 3606 MEADOW PARK DRIVE FEMA MAP N484910049SE SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 Texas Coastal Management Program MDNTQM*RY LR,it LLA itiliERTY WASHINGTON A. AiLE I Arf TTI TIP? KARkA ]EFFERSOI 1 _ CHAMBERS Pf �OLOQA IORi BCh17 i iC.VTIgFB - '�y LAVACA %V,ARTAN, \ +.. crLLLfEST :+r r DF RffT'T 1 f .ARMS .IA MATAGORDA GOLIAD 0 ROUND ROCK, TX - - CALMMN 1' 5µV RK10 r X11 ` NURCC5 � KLEBERG — wuir>.n wn >!ENED� LO 0 LO 20 141 t LLAL i CA Google Maps Page 1 of 3 Google Drive 29.7 miles, 29 min Directions from Round Rock, TX 78664 to Austin -Bergstrom International Airport C7 we..e cww.a iw..n..a LD p .® ® ® i"./�� ...• O ) o © Eig O Round Rock, TX 78664 A This route has tolls. Get on TX -45 E/TX-45 Toll from F Greenlawn Blvd and S A W Grimes Blvd ,•rN•Y Cyd ry _ • ,wuq t 1. Head south on Greenlawn Blvd toward Parkside Cir - --g{mi , • 01 2. Take the 3rd left onto Gattis School Rd t P 3. Turn right onto S A W Grimes Blvd h 4. Turn left onto Louis Henna Blvd �*,•., E 5 Slight left onto the Texas 45 Toll E ramp € w A Toll road -,..W.. 0.2 mi Take TX -130 S to Texas 130 Service Rd • > " in Travis County. Take exit 449 from �.a„•,•.r o o c o TM 30 S o -. _ aa.. a.n QgwM�e,knnw C . https://www.google.com/maps/&/Round+Rock,+TX+78664/austin+bergstrom+intemati... 10/30/2014 Google Maps Page 2 of 3 M 0 ------ -- 3.6mi-/5min y� S 10. Merge onto Texas 130 Service Rd A Toll road ip� 8.3 mi 11. Take the Texas 71 W ramp to Austin A Toll road i _.. __-_ -. 0..3 mi E 12 Merge onto TX -71 W M 13. Take the exit toward Austin—Bergstrom Iru'I Airport 0.1 mi t 14. Continue onto E State Hwy 71 Service Rd &1 mi 41 15. Turn left onto Presidential Blvd $b mi 01 16. Keep left to continue toward Presidential Blvd - 0.1 mi t 17. Continue onto Presidential Blvd ___�.2 mi O Austin -Bergstrom International Airport 3600 Presidential Blvd, Austin, TX 78719 https-.11 w .google.comlmapsldirlRound+Rock,+TX+786641austin+bergstrom+intemati... 10/30/2014 23.6 mi/18 min 6. Merge onto TX -45 E/TX45 Toll A Toll road —2:9 mi M 7. Take the Texas 45 Toll S/Texas 130 Toll S exit toward Austin A Toll road - —.__.____$9mi 8. Merge onto Texas 45 Toll/TX-130 S le continue to follow TX -130 3 A Partial toll road --19.4 mi M 9. Take exit 449 toward Texas 71/Austin/Houston A Toll road 9:3 mi Take TX -71 W to Presidential Blvd in Austin Page 2 of 3 M 0 ------ -- 3.6mi-/5min y� S 10. Merge onto Texas 130 Service Rd A Toll road ip� 8.3 mi 11. Take the Texas 71 W ramp to Austin A Toll road i _.. __-_ -. 0..3 mi E 12 Merge onto TX -71 W M 13. Take the exit toward Austin—Bergstrom Iru'I Airport 0.1 mi t 14. Continue onto E State Hwy 71 Service Rd &1 mi 41 15. Turn left onto Presidential Blvd $b mi 01 16. Keep left to continue toward Presidential Blvd - 0.1 mi t 17. Continue onto Presidential Blvd ___�.2 mi O Austin -Bergstrom International Airport 3600 Presidential Blvd, Austin, TX 78719 https-.11 w .google.comlmapsldirlRound+Rock,+TX+786641austin+bergstrom+intemati... 10/30/2014 Google Maps Page 1 of 3 Go SIe Drive 75.1 miles, l h 17 min Directions from Killeen-Fort Hood Regional Airport to Austin-Bergstrom International Airport U., (Isl O C V:... O p e....r.e ww"ani O ,.mp.0 o AN'ian/N Nlwn O O vW C) �19 mm We ,m. uew d J iaWe © WIR61.Gm fpptlo'.m� © OO wu - O *we ✓ 0= ..a..0 O Killeen-Fort Hood Regional Airport A This route has tolls. 8101 S Clear Creek Rd, Killeen, TX 76549 Take Ivy Mountain Rd, Oakalla Rd and, ;K ®# FM2657 to US-183 S in Burnet County o _ 206mi125 min ® ®�, ^ r�senw.d f t 1. Head southeast toward S Clear Creek Rd o B.3 mi 10 2. Turn right onto S Clear Creek Rd -19.4mi n r 3. Turn right onto Ivy Mountain Rd _..8:5 mi O t 4. Continue onto oakalla Rd o - 4.2 4:2 mi t 5. Continue onto Co Rd 221 _ - -- - - -7Bmi G= O o h 6. Turn left onto FM2657 10.2 mi h 7. Turn left onto State Spur 308 05 mi O https://www.google.com/maps/d r/Kilicen-Fort+Hood+Regional+Airport,+8101+S+Clear... 10/30/2014 Google Maps Follow US -183 S, Route 183A S/183A Toll Rd S and US -183 S to E State Hwy 71 Service Rd in Austin. Take the exit toward Austin - Bergstrom International Airport from TX -71 E _s3.5rnr/-51 min ti 8. Slight left onto US -183 S _ 39.9 mi t 9. Continue onto Route 183A S/183A Toll Rd S r 16. A Partial toll road o -_193 mi t 10. Continue onto US -183 S 21.6 mi E 11. Take the Texas 71 E ramp on the left to t 18. Austin Bergstrom Intl Airport ___--{34 mi 12. Merge onto TX -71 E aA mi Ir 13. Take the exit toward Austin -Bergstrom _ m k,. rock International Airport 02 mi Drive to Presidential Blvd 0.9mi 11 min x 14. Merge onto E State Hwy 71 Service Rd ---- - - - 0.1 mi r 15. Slight right toward Presidential Blvd 358 ft r 16. Slight right onto Presidential Blvd o 0.4 mi 07 17. Keep left to continue toward Presidential Blvd mi t 18. Continue onto Presidential Blvd _...92 mi Page 2 of 3 O Austin -Bergstrom International Airport 3600 Presidential Blvd, Austin, TX 78719 https://www.google.romlmapsldirIKiHccn-Fort+Hood+Regional+Airport,+8101+S+Clear... 10/30/2014 ��..w , xa...xenxmam � 7..9e� o p _ m k,. rock "'moi°^ euni o O Austin -Bergstrom International Airport 3600 Presidential Blvd, Austin, TX 78719 https://www.google.romlmapsldirIKiHccn-Fort+Hood+Regional+Airport,+8101+S+Clear... 10/30/2014 ROUND ROCK TEXAS ' PVPPOSE. PlS510µ PRn5PEPT'. CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TX 78664 Statutory Checklist for Compliance with 24 CFR §58.5 - NEPA Related Federal Laws and Authorities (Must be completed for each individual addressed included under overall project description) Use this worksheet for projects that are Categorically Excluded Subject to 24 CFR §58.5 listed at 24 CFR §58.35(a) and for projects that require an Environmental Assessment. Project Name: Habitat for Humanity Affordable Home Repair 3606 Meadow Park Drive ERR FILE # Definitions: A: The project is in compliance. B: The project requires an additional compliance step or action. Statute, Authority, Executive Order A I B I COMPLIANCE FINDING SOURCE DOCUMENTATION Cited at 24 CFR 458.5 L 58.5(a) Historic Properties [36 Project -I1 not affect any Clearance letter from SHPO CFR 800 I historic gmperties. attached. 2. 58.5(6)(1) Floodplain 7 This project is not located FEMA map attached. Management [24 CFR 55, Executive within the 100 year Order 119881 Rood lain. 3. 58.5(b)(2) Wetland Protection x This project is not located in See attached wetland maps. 24 CFR 55 Executive Order 11990 or near wetlands. 4. 58.5(c) Coastal Zone Management [Coastal Zone Management Act sections 307(c) & This project is not located d within a coastal zone. Map of Texas Coast attached. 5. 58.5(d) Sole Source Aquifers Project is in Williamson [40 CFR 149] Project is not located within County which does not an EOA designated sole contain a sole source aquifer. source aquifer. Documentation attached. 6. 58.5(e) Endangered Species [50 x No critical habitat located in This project is likely to have a CFR 4021 or near this project site. "No Effect" on federally protected species and critical habitat 7. 58.5(f) Wild and Scenic Rivers x Project is located more than See attached map showing [36 CFR 2971 400 miles from a designated nearest wild and scenic river wild and scenic river. and project site, information on wild and scenic rivers including "How Far Is It" showing distance in miles. 8. 58.5(g) Air Quality [40 CFR x Project is located in See list of Non Attainment parts 6, 51,61, 93] Williamson County, which is counties in Texas. not a Non Attainment area. 9. 58.5(h) Famrland Protection [7 x ct is located in an area See zoning map attached. CFR 658 for urban use. 10. 58.5(ix]) Noise Control and Irty is not within 15 fhi, See attached map showing Abatement [24 CFR 51B] of a civilian or military dutaoce from project site to t, 1000 feet of a major nearest major roadway and a or bus roatl, or railroad. Notae calculation u 19 ® Boa "A" has been checked for all authorities. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a) [Does not apply to EA or EIS level of review which can never convert to Exempt], the project can convert to Exempt, per §58.34(a) (12), since the project does not require any compliance measures (e.g, consultation, mitigation, permit or approval) with respect to any law or authority cited at §58.5. The project is now made Exempt and funds maybe drawn down; OR ❑ Box "B" has been checked for one or more authority. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a), the project cannot convert to Exempt since one or more authority requires compliance, including but not limited to consultation with or approval from an oversight agency, performance of a study or analysis, completion of remediation or mitigation mesa=, or obtaining of license or permit. Complete pertinent compliance mquirement(s), publish NOURROF, request release of funds (HUD -7105.15), and obtain HUD's Authority to Use Grant Funds (HUD -7015.16) per §58.70 and §58.71 before committing funds; OR ❑ This project is not a Categorically Excluded action pursuant to §58.35(a), or may result in a significant environmental impact to the environment, and requires preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). Prepare the EA according to 24 CFR Part 58 Subpart E. MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL: (/f Bax Bis checked, provide details regardingfurther consultation, mitigation, permit requirements or approvals within 3000 feet of a railroad, not re aired. 11. 58.5 (i) (1) Explosive and As per HUD Rep Laura Myers, See email from HUD Rep Flammable Operations [24 CFR 51C] the interpretation of rehab and Laura Myen and a memo to modernization as described in file from CDBG staff the ASD Guidebook, refer only attached. to such repairs and renovation that will result in an increase in the number of people, or converting the use of a building in human habitation, or making a vacant building habitable. This project scope does not involve this type of renovation that will increase number of people 12. 58.5(ixl) Airport Hazards Properly is not withio 5,000 See list of military and (Runway Clear Zones and Clear x feet of a civilian airport, civilian airports and distance Zones/Accident Potential Zones) [24 runway clear zone, or 15,000 of these airports from project CFR 51D] feet of a military airfield, site attached. clear zone or accidental potential zone. 13. 58.5(i)(2)(i-iv) Contamination x Project site is not located See documentation on and Toxic Substances [24 CFR within any of the minimum contamination and toxic 58.5(ix2)] search distances. substances near project site and memo from City staff on prior use of this Droiect site 14. 58.50) Environmental Justice x Nature of project will not Project is not located in or [Executive Order 128981 impact Environmental designed to serve a Justice. predominately minority and low to moderate income neighborhood. ® Boa "A" has been checked for all authorities. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a) [Does not apply to EA or EIS level of review which can never convert to Exempt], the project can convert to Exempt, per §58.34(a) (12), since the project does not require any compliance measures (e.g, consultation, mitigation, permit or approval) with respect to any law or authority cited at §58.5. The project is now made Exempt and funds maybe drawn down; OR ❑ Box "B" has been checked for one or more authority. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a), the project cannot convert to Exempt since one or more authority requires compliance, including but not limited to consultation with or approval from an oversight agency, performance of a study or analysis, completion of remediation or mitigation mesa=, or obtaining of license or permit. Complete pertinent compliance mquirement(s), publish NOURROF, request release of funds (HUD -7105.15), and obtain HUD's Authority to Use Grant Funds (HUD -7015.16) per §58.70 and §58.71 before committing funds; OR ❑ This project is not a Categorically Excluded action pursuant to §58.35(a), or may result in a significant environmental impact to the environment, and requires preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). Prepare the EA according to 24 CFR Part 58 Subpart E. MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL: (/f Bax Bis checked, provide details regardingfurther consultation, mitigation, permit requirements or approvals required to be incorporated into public notices and project requirements such as contracts, grants, loan conditions, etc. as described in the Statutory Worksheet). Ensure required measures are included in 7015.15 Project Description Section. Elizabeth Alvarado Preperer's Name (printed) I t /A 112014 Date CDBG Coordinator Title (printed) AUTH D RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Authorized Respotisible Entit45riPature Date Laurie Hadley Interim City Manager Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) Title (printed) 21 ROUND ROCK TDUS .usw. •,ww..m.m,. October 8, 2014 W. Charles Peveto, SHPO Texas Historical Commission P.O. Box 12276 Austin, TX 78711-2276 Dear Mr. Peveto: NOT ELIGIBLE for listing in the National Register of Histonc Places PRO by �MAY�PROCEED for Mark Wolfe StateHistoric Preservation Officer Date L j. e • Id OCT I d zir,* In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470f), and its implementing regulation, 36 CFR 800, "Protection of Historic Properties ", we are initiating consultation with your office regarding the Round Rock Habitat for Humanity CDBG 2014 Affordable Home Repair Program at the following address: 3606 MEADOW PARK DRIVE MEADOW LAKE AWX 6, BLOCK T, LOT 12 R403497H (R403497H — Meadow Lake Sec 1A, 2 (Rev) 3, 6) Scope of work: Minor home repair to include roof repair, replace screen door, add agraffe door opener, fence repair, repair or replace HVAC Based on our initial research, we have made the required determinations and findings, which we now ask you to review. Please respond in writing to us within twenty days. If you concur with the findings in this submission, please sign and date on the line below and return as noted above. If you do not concur, we request that you express your concerns and objections clearly in writing so that HUD may continue the consultation process as needed. Please also indicate in your non- concurrence letter if there are other sources of information that should be checked, and if there are other parties, tribes, or members of the public you believe should be included in the consultation process. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Alvarado �& �evelomncit Coordinator Preservation Officer/ Date Attachments: Texas Historical Commission Request for SHPO Consultation Maps (Fema Map, City of Round Rock Map) Williamson County Tax Appraisal District property ID List of Properties with Historic Overlay in Round Rock Scope of Work and Addresses Pictures CITY OF ROUND ROCK CDBG 2014 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AFFORDABLE HOME REPAIR PROGRAM ZONE FIRAAq,��, ROOONNRNICEMR W wauA.�wnr: cocerrr, ruznx apiaAmaniu WM a�<W 3606 MEADOW PARK DRIVE FEMA MAP #48493C049SE SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 u't a'^ U.S. Fish r Wildlife 606 meadow park National Wetlands Inventory drive Nov 25,2014 e. Wetlands F- '� \ -:Q ' fraxM1weter Emergent Y �� "�C � ,\ � � FreaM1wAar ForecdQ/SM1M I � __I_ _• .o �� 1•$ �1;;% Fwunne ane Marine Deepwater -�,- Ecwanneand Marine ZM rte - Fhwater Pond _ r. ` _ t:_ • / cake vedne � n Ri ✓ � e 1 Water — j Tdnk l _ ' al, - water 2o'odtt : 1 1 }inky •n User Remarks: ,Mw.,�_,...,,.•..e.e. �d...d,,.�e. habitat for humanity affordable home repair cdbg 2014 . . . I a 380 ndow park National Wetlands Invento Nov 25,2074 Wetlands Fnaaweter Erear,aet \ �\ FmMna F. CSnM �. EMW dneandd Marine Deepwa4r - Ea nne and Marine FrteawMa Pond Lake 1 Rivedm 7hil IP ZA � w,x a L yy O rs ii ,m.ne uM,n.,u aaktift xw„m m.anx_rr v wrme„��aux Z-41 •�cgns�Ne,ux tryxm,wm w User Remarks: habitat for humanity affordable home repair cdbg 2014 z � • � CL .: ■ . §w �| g � / m q 9 y \ \ ■■■■�■■■ ` �§ § �ƒ§� � ! z 2 . � 0 ƒ - } C. « / ■ qj s tillits o $ / ■■■��■■§Mc ■ `!\�• � ■ Try Tcxas Coastal Managcmcnt Program � .... %- . i MONres"r . k .. WA aas*rtcp FAVfr 40WE1 I, COC. c-Irw4 FS IAVACA NUQC KlEBEaG KENEOv .141 L T 7 V- rA "kah N MATAGCM')A i I '`t CALHCYJN � ti CHAMOERS -A . ROUND ROCK, TX wrw hw K✓✓um lR.Aw 10 0 10 70 MI" N LO ! L._/ }® / (a \ ) )$ §\ k_/ }®// � `$=k\ : \§ j:§ $ \ §2&$ ((! 2§i\ §* G @ „§;§22;G!§Er§:§®!:n§kea! ;■;§e;■,§§q§§gldmii-§qq§q;R§m--S-10 ;§§§§§§!!.55k:s!!!!!!!!w!!!!!55rrrdr /§ K§§§\\ /\\§§ ;}\\\// awwwwww!= /!E,°)!§a§!Q!!!&l®;�(\$§»)&!§`§§2ƒm&�E2;A!§!& M UCY\W §§G!!!Gwww§! !_!_!_masm &2)227/§§(k//$§|(/$/®§k»k//}2722 ;,,,«:/\))//j)/////////§§§§§ :aG##44! (((\(k/\\ OZQZ >>a A O mW RLLy }Q Z w U M mo y �p� s Z N W Qz< 09E W Z°wuS��Glg0o=aZwu�>�a¢3oaaa�ayoyooa�an Z J � O gK Z. a W m rc W 4 J K m S tg 2 S Z m m S Q J LLi 2 K a (O f9 F- 0 Y 0 U 0 W 2 i K m m m U W U' S 0 1- f�N m(�2m0 mV m MmM Ov'NN mM mh Ogmf O 'MM�IV Nmh�mN mm (O MO pm Rt�00 M N2 OON�00R �y N�{�{y N U M N N mm {y N O O a O a Y V Q Y Y Y V Q V V V'V V V V V'm M M M M M N �g6m=61 666 W W W W W W W WWW U w UUUUUNwo: w w U wwww000��ON0000 MUM 0 000moNWWzZNWN Oo WW800 KKC ZZZZ11, NNN°N3333333333333oonoiQ333 po WWWWOOOO�O�1I (9 U� C7 (7LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLzf.7 J0J J0J00022ww000 (7 LLIJLLL yUy�UUUK�K K �25��66WSSM�W K.i2 (~p R' mfg {LL{.�' KKKK NNQQKG KI-FUU 66 7. it 0_'K Wyf��j 00105 W(/� Nl9VJ�fp W W kkk K LL_ KO�'KKKWKW LL_ LL_ LL_ LL_ LL_ LL WKWKKK LL � LL LL {!Wyk Wy�Wy�W�y �ggaaaaaaaaaaa LLLLLL_LL_LL_LL_IiLL_LL_LL_LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 7 oaaoaaa¢ 7 7 aaaaaaaaaa 5555 7 J oaaaaa��'x LL_LL_LL_z_2_2Z_Z_ZVJJ)V10141� 7 7 N (9 J J_ x -x xx J ayay¢aaaaaaaaaaa¢a¢aaaaaa(lJ OO NM�D�gN y00�00❑000❑0 OW zZyzzz Ww u�i 333p3p3p3pp3p�3p3p�3333p3pp3p3p3pp3p33ppp3p3ppf�f��a��p�p�`�� gNOOD gU 0 0 0 0 111111 WWWWWWWWWW�WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWNNN�O/1 fOA w i w O z�Ca 0 oZo F"�� J =�00 16zoozwzmrcm Z~KZax a z Z 00z 22Z wi O MR %n �Z2 �MM,Vvqu�+Mc�[v MUM, pNgKx- S7 p3z ¢zo WR 7xO0aW FF S Kw3?i 1 )1p�� 1 t0V �0ty� t0V l0V ��y01�ryR I��NI� t0V t0V t0V t0V W Ol t0tVV bl�h"1y�1�o��iTi�yW ll0VV N0_�1N�N�Ntyy �Ntyy 00000�� tpo l` N�-I�t�T W�� INNNNNNNNNN l`y�J'j NNNNNNNNN A NNNNNNNNNNNN �55353355555553333�g��gg�� 1�i� gi SW. u�7 in y}}n �9> jiii %n �n�>��iJ ��iiww it ii tin nNN yy�N>>/y�y1>>yy �i to tnbW n�i �iN��R }�N} �jiij ��jiijj�ai ��jjj �n �n ��jj vJ l�i�m t}n K w w LLLL w w wW KKK wwwW KKLL' W W wW KKKKKKKK WIl11�1 1� �11 w LLLLLL w2wwW� LL__LL LL LL_LL_LL_LL_LLLL_ K W WW LL__LLLL_LLLLLLLL111LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLI_L LL_I_L IL aaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa t�ymmmmmmJwtJn tJJn a�mwtn `3 t3 t3 t3 v1m to t3 `3 "t3 t3 S xxzLL2zLL��ggLL2''22222 SS2222222222x2Z2 zzzz zzzzzz Z2Z2 Z2Z2 Z2Z z2z2 W KW��WWWIWW 2222 K2 WWWW 2 W�KK�KKKKKKRWwwwww 2 W 2S W W W 2 W W 2 W W 2121....2 111111111 W W W W gg W W W 0000000(il loo M(0/ 0y NN twwm w..N t0phf0/1t0/1NNNll CRITICAL HABITAT MAPPER 3606 MEADOW PARK DRIVE 16 ®Cop gM30E8ESM PIIngMsreserved. PnWdon TW Nw354014031095]PM ROUND ROCK, TEXAS THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK runrosr. wort vnosvexm MEMORANDUM TO: Habitat for Humanity Single Family Rehab ERR Project File FROM: Elizabeth Alvarado, CDBG Coordinator DATE: October 30, 2014 SUBJECT: "No Effect' on Endangered Species The City of Round Rock CDBG Program Year 2014-2015 for single family rehabilitation at 3606 Meadow Park Drive includes roof repair, replace screen door, add garage door opener, fence repair, repair or replace HVAC. I reviewed the USFWS and NMFS Endangered Species Act -Species Search and Critical Habitat websites for Williamson County. There were no Critical Habitat in or near the project site. Based on the nature of the project and information reviewed from the USFWS and NMFS websites, it is my opinion that the nature of the project will likely have "no effect" on federally protected species and critical habitat. < 3 G o p,P Miu � 7 vFxrt OSfe 4FF �o }p ego :� aE -a$B-1 E• ' I P _ - �l -� •r E p i o YUEmo 5oP EE E x v�cExr• oP ol Z.1 ogS&.� Bd i �$§ a�'� e / tip Sam d§6±f/ i $ a $ - meg, 5 E• B 0,C — l�' g � < O �W iacne `o V � 9 s 3 l 3 !a �s How Far Is It? - Big Bend National Park (U.S. National Park Service) Page 1 of 2 How Far Is It? The Big Bend region is vast and isolated. Highway travel between destinations usually takes several hours and available services can be limited. Mileage from Big Bend National Park Headquarters at Panther Junction to: Abilene - 392 miles Alpine -too miles Amarillo - 481 miles Austin - 474 miles Beaumont - 697 miles Big Spring - 281 miles Brownsville - 634 miles Brownwood - 398 miles Carlsbad Caverns NP. New Mexico CUW://www.nM.=/cave/index.htin)CorpusChristi-526mfles - 305 miles Dallas - 559 miles Del Rio - 253 miles F1 Paso - 329 miles Fort Davis -128 miles Fort Stockton -127 miles Fort Worth - 529 miles Guadalupe Mountains NP Galveston - 657 miles (httu;//www.njo.eov/gmoandex.htm) - 275 miles Houston - 610 miles Lajitas - 41 miles Langtry - 211 miles Laredo - 434 miles Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park OM: I/www.nps,go-v/Wo/hu1exht3n) -410 miles Lubbock - 358 miles Marathon - 69 miles Marfa -126 miles McAllen - 577 miles Midland - 242 miles Monahan -178 miles Odessa - 222 miles Ojinaga, Mexico - 93 miles Padre Island Natl. Seashore OM://www.xWs.=/Vxi.s/index.htin)Pecos-igimfles - 543 miles Presidio - 92 miles San Angelo - 300 miles San Antonio - 406 miles Sanderson -123 miles Study Butte - 24 miles Terlingua - 28 miles Van Horn - 200 miles Victoria - 526 miles Waco - 518 miles Wichita Falls - 513 miles http://www.nps.gov/bibe/plmyourvisit/milesto_from.htm 9/15/2014 List of non attainment counties in Texas htto://www.eoa.aov/oaaos001/greenbk/ancl.html 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Brazoria Co + Frisco, TX - (Nonattalnment) 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (1008) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Chambers Cc 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Collin Cc 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) (2008) Lead + Frisco, TX - (Nonattalnment) 8 -Hr Ozone (2008) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Dallas Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Denton Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) EI Paso Cc PM -10 * EI Paso Co, TX - (Moderate) (1987) Ellis Cc 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Fort Bend Co 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Galveston Co List of non attainment counties in Texas htto://www.eoa.goy/oaaos001/greenbk/ancl.html 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Marginal) Harris Cc 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Marginal) Johnson Co 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone (2008) Dallas -Fart Worth, TX - (Moderate) Kaufman Cc 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone (2008) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Uberty Cc 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX -(Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Marginal) Montgomery Cc 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazorla, TX - (Marginal) Parker Cc 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) B -Hr Ozone (2008) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Rockwall Cc 8 -Hr Ozone (1997) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone (2008) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Tarrant Cc 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) List of non attainment counties in Texas htti)://www.epa.goy/oagPsOOl/greenbk/ancl.htmI Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) Waller Co 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) Ozone (1997) 8 -Hr Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Ozone (2008) Wise Co 8 -Hr Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Ozone (2008) 3 a. D1 ,- ASu®R QIMFIlk '�T►''�B = � 0�-1 all . ' `� RE, I� .. _LS3JJ'p�l�a�lM�33R'�.Q�LNM p.1!♦493� - n•,1\\�� 1 1 • on". • � 1101111111111 1' \ 351 TM Val IW . 1. Wo— Mill `ply��°Om - "'"""SSS ��"""��••• - " • 'w�� I' .. � nim � , 11 „ •/ q ��, F -�.'ga I . � � t ♦ .. �� Pi♦ •pule O � � __ PARCELS J � � ♦ .. m `1111 1 ago% y, - � �� t • p I. ••pp�i 1 � ��i ��i1O111➢IW'NMYI // • •p -Elizabeth Alvarado-- - From: Myers, Laure L <Laura.L.Myers®hudgov> Sent: Friday, November 18, 201111:51 AM To: Elizabeth Alvarado Cc: Britton, Barbara R subjaat' RE: housing allthodly project Liz, Forthe level of upgrades you are doing (replacing appliances and some HVAC units, painting, and fencing( y lint need to do a noise level calculation. I would strongly encourage you, If an opportunity arises to do an energyaud(t, especially rt osethstam nearest the railway, to consider assessing the noise Issue. Itisverytasytoaaommodate noise attenuation when upgrading energy of iclency inthe home. R/ LM From: Myers, Laura L Sent: Thursday, November 17, 201110:43 AM To: 'Elizabeth Alvarado' cc: Britton, Barbara R Subject: RE: housing authority project Liz, You will still need to address noise in the envhvnmemal review process. Is there an airport within 15 miles of the site? Is there a major roadway within 1000 feet ofthe site? Is there a railway within 3000 feet of the site? Iftheanswerstoall of these questions are "no" then you have done all you need to address noise. If any afthe answers are yes, then a noise analysis would need to be done to calculate the DNL of the site. If the site DNL Is leas than 650, then you have done all you need to address noise. For major or substantial rehab projects, Ifthe DNL is 65-75 dg HUD entourages noise attenuation to be Included In renovations commensurate with the level of renovation planned. If the DNL is above 75 dB, HUD strongly encourages conversion ofthe noise -exposed site to a land use more compatible with high levels of Boise. Please see Part 51.101(a115j As for addressing explosives and flammable operations, the regulations apply to any HUD -assisted project as aetinea in 24CFs51.201. The Interpretation of"rehabilitation" and "modem[zation' In that definition as described in the ASD Guidebook refer only to such repairs and renovation of the HUD -assisted project that will result In an Increase In the number of people, or convertingthe use ate building to human habitation, or making a vacant building habitable. Ifthe above described type of renovation Is planned for your project, then you wlll need to address this Issue, whkh would begin with a site visit and visual survey of en area one mile in radius surrounding the site for any above ground storage tanks. if it does not Involve the above described type of renovation, then you will only need to state that In yon ERR. Let me know H I [lave answered your questions or if you need anything further. From: Elizabeth Aiveredo [mallta:laly mda®taund-rodcbx.usj sent, Wednesday, November 16, 20114:02 PM To: Myers, Laura L subject: FW: housing authority project Laura, Since this project Is more renovating and minor rehab how should I answer on explosives and f 2mmabl%and toxic chemicals and noise abatement? Should I consult someone from the city on this as documentation. Thanks for all your help. . Liz 341-3328 From: Elizabeth Alvarado Sent: Wednesday, November 16,20113:12 PM To; 'Myers, Laura L' Subject: RE: housing authority project Yes they are hud funds but not cdbg• Thank you. Fromi Myers, Laura L [mellto:Leura.L,Myers®hud.govj Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20113:11 PM To: Elimbeth Alvarado Subject: RE: housing authority project I agree, although konly applies If HUD funds are being used R/ LM From: Elizabeth Alvarado[mallto:Ialverado®round-rcck.1x.us] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20111:54 PM To: Myers, Laura L subjech housing authority project HI lours, Any time the Round Rock Housing Authority needs an environmental done even if it's not a project being funded with CDBG funds, I have to do the review. so the Housing Authority Is asking me to do a review for the following project at the administrative office and the housing units at the housing authority main location being paid with CFP funds: Interior Renovations to Include painting Replace existing ranges with new ones Replace administrative equipment Replace existing HVAC systems with new ones per unit as needed 1 determined that the forms that I need to use are the following Compliance Documentation Checklist Categadrelly Excluded Subject to 58.5 per 24 CFR 58.35 (a) 3 ii statutory Checklist (and it converts to exempt?) lfLL1Y6V. A3LlILIIL JG6LNl 1\W WLR MAllllOSS My AirNav Airport Search Results 22 airports found near Round Rock, TX ID CITY AIRPORT NAME WHERE EDC AUSTIN, TX AUSTIN EXECUTIVE AIRPORT 8.8 nm SE ® GTU GEORGETOWN, TX GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 10.2 nm N T74 TAYLOR, TX TAYLOR MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 12.8 nm ENE EHRYW LAGO VISTA, TX LAGO VISTA TX - RUSTY ALLEN 15.0 mn W AIRPORT 3R9 LAKEWAY, TX LAKEWAY AIRPARK AIRPORT 18.7 nm WSW AUS AUSTIN, TX ASR iBERGSTROM INTERNATIONAL 18.8 = S 88R SPICEWOOD, TX SPICEWOOD AIRPORT 23.0 nmW ED BMQ BURNET, TX BURNET MUNICIPAL KATE CRADDOCK 32.1 ma WNW FIELD AIRPORT GRK FORT HOOD/KI.LEEN, ROBERT GRAY AAF AIRPORT 34.4 mNNW TX ILE KILLEEN, TX SKYLARK FIELD AIRPORT 34.7 mn N DZB HORSESHOE BAY, TX HORSESHOE BAY RESORT AIRPORT 35.2 mn W RCK ROCKDALE, TX H H COFFIELD REGIONAL AIRPORT 36.4 = ENE HLR HOODWLLEEN), HOOD AAFAIRPORT 37.9 nm N TORT HYI SAN MARCOS, TX SAN MARCOS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 38.1 ma SSW 2KL SUNRISE BEACH SUNRISE BEACH AIRPORT 38.1 ma W VILLAGE, TX 84R SMITHVI.LE, TX SS LE CRAWFORD MUNICIPAL 39.1 nm SE PORT 50R LOCKHART, TX LOCKHART MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 39.5 mn S TPL TEMPLE, TX DRAUGHON-MILLER CENTRAL TEXAS 41.1 mn NNE REGIONAL AIRPORT GYB GIDDINGS, TX GIDDINGS-LEE COUNTY AIRPORT 41.5 mn ESE Efl T35 CAMERON, TX CAMERON MUNICIPAL ABRPARK 42.7 mn ENE AIRPORT ERLZZ LAMPASAS, TX LAMPASAS AIRPORT 44.7 nm NW https://w .aimay.com/cgi-bin/airport-search 11/20/2014 Mayor Alan McGraw ROUND ROCK TEXAS Mayor Pro -Tem PLANNING E CleV LOPMINT SERVICES OMMMTMENT George White To whom it may concern: Councllmemhers Craig Morgan Joe Clifford Will Peckham John Moman Kris Whitfield City Manager Laurie Hadley, Interim City Attorney Stephan L Sheers November 21,2014 Re: Environmental Review Record for 3606 Meadow Park Drive, Round Rock, Texas 78665; parcel R312712 There is no record of this property being occupied by any use other than a single-family residence. There is no reason to believe environmentally -sensitive or hazardous materials of any kind have been produced or stored on this property. The property was annexed into the City on December 13, 1984, along with the all other lots within its subdivision (Meadow Lake). Upon annexation it was zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential), which was the primary zoning district for single-family uses at the time. The R-1 district was later changed to become the SF -2 (Single Family — Standard Lot) district, which is the current standard single-family zoning district for the City of Round Rock. The property was vacant between the annexation and the structure being built in 1997. It was constructed as a single family home, which it remains today. The source of this information is records kept by the City of Round Rock Planning and Development Services department. Please contact me at 512-671-2728 should you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bradley Dushkin, Senior Planner Planning and Development Services Department cc: Elizabeth Alvarado CITY OF ROUND ROCK 301 West Bagdad, Suite 210, Round Rock Texas 78664 Planning [P] 512.218.5428 -Code Enforcement [P] 512.341.3329 • [F3 512.218.3286 . roundrocktexas.gov 3606 meadow park drive 3606 MEADOW PARK DRIVE ROUND ROCK, TEXAS Prepared for: habitat for humantiy file Ref: habitat rehab project Thursday, October 02, 2014 Environmental Radius Report ,1 r L NET r- fthrte 20% Rio Salado Pkwy Tempe,6, AZ 66387 480-967-6762 Summary Aerial Views Flood Zones Hazard Map National Wetlands Map National Priorities List (NPL) CERCLIS List CERCLIS NFRAP RCRA CORRACTS Facilities RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities Federal Institutional Control / Engineering Control Registry Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) US Toxic Release Inventory US RCRA Generators (CESQG, SQG, LOG) US ACRES (Brownfields) US NPOES TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR TX Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks TX Drycleaners TX State Superfund Registry TX Brownfields TX Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites TX Innocent Owner Program TX Landfills 2004, 1985, 1973, 1954 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) <1/4 1/4-1/2 112-1 3 32 2 'k. y Flood Hazard Zones Map Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Future Conditions 110 Annual Chance Flood Hazard 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Regulatory Floodway ■ Special Floodway . Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee National Wetlands Map ?y--' (EW 6 6.45ni 36.54666, -97.66481 010 V�Xy ■ Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland ■ Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland ■ Freshwater Pond ■ Lake ■ Other ■ Riverine National Priorities List (NPL) This database returned no results for your area. The Superfund Program, administered under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) is an EPA Program to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. The NPL (National Priorities List) is the list of national priorities among the known releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants throughout the United States and its territories. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation. The boundaries of an NPL site are not tied to the boundaries of the property on which a facility is located. The release may be contained with a single property's boundaries or may extend across property boundaries onto other properties. The boundaries can, and often do change as further information on the extent and degree of contamination is obtained. CERCLIS List This database returned no results for your area. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) investigates known or suspected ncontrolled or abandoned hazardous substance facilities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). EPA maintains a comprehensive list of these facilities in a database known as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS). These sites have eitherben investigated or are currently under investigation by the EPA for release or threatened release of hazardcus substances. Once a site is placed in CERCLIS, it may be subjected to several levels of review and evaluation and ultimately placed on a National Priority List (NPL). CERCLIS sites designated as "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an ridtial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the stobe placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Supertund Action or NPL consideration. CERCLIS NFRAP This database returned no results for your area. As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" NF�b een removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP It found, contamination was may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was serious enough to removed quickly without the site being placed on the NPL, or the contamination as was not EPA has removed require Federal Supertund action or NPL consideration. these NFRAP sites from CERCLIS to lift unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these n%s ore and haRectad c t lens pro ote economic redevelopment of ung d ctive urban sites. rogram to help cities, states, private RCRA CORRACTS Facilities This database returned no results for your area. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA maintains the Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS) database of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities that are undergoing "corrective action." A "corrective action order" is issued pursuant to RCRA Section 3008(h) when there has been a release of hazardous waste or constituents into the environment from a RCRA facility. Corrective actions may be required beyond the facility -s boundary and can be required regardless of when the release occurred, even if it predated RCRA. RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities This database returned no results for your area. The United States Environmental Protection Agency((EPA) regulates hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA"s RE Program identifies and tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA Facilites database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities that report generation, storage, transportation; treatment, or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Permitted Treatment, Storage, Disposal Facilities (RCRA-TSD) are facilities which treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste. Federal Institutional Control / Engineering Control Registry This database returned no results for your area. Federal Institutional Control / Engineering Control Registry Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) This database returned no results for your area. The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a national computer database used to store information on unauthorized releases of oil and hazardous substances. The program is a cooperative effort of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation Research and Special Program Administration"s John Volpe National Transportation System Center and the National Response Center. There are primarily five Federal statutes that require release reporting: the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) section 103; the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act(SARA) Title III Section 304: the Clean Water Act of 1972(CWA) section 311(b)(3); and the Hazardous Material Transportation Act of 1974(HMTA section 1808(b). US Toxic Release Inventory This database returned no results for your area. The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a publicly available EPA database that contains information on toxic chemical releases and other waste management activities reported annually by certain covered industry groups as well as federal facilities. TRI reporters for all reporting years are provided in the file. US RCRA Generators (CESQG, SQG, LQG) This database returned no results for your area. The United Stales Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA maintains a database of facilities, which generate hazardous waste or treat, store, and/or dispose of hazardous wastes. Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or 1 kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Small Quantity Generators (SQG) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Large Quantity Generators (LOG) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste, or more than 1 kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. US ACRES (Brownfields) This database returned no results for your area. Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes developmentstem (pressures off greenspaces and Broownfelds Grantees lands. The sto electronically submit data directland y tonThe United Exchange Sta es Environmental Protection Agency is an online database for (EPA) US NPDES This database returned no results for your area. The NPDES module of the Compliance Information System (ICIS) tracks surface water permits issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that discharge pollutants from any point source Into waters of the United States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the discharge does not adversely affect water quality. TX Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks This database returned no results for your area. The Texas Comm Leaking^ petroleum Environmental Quaa ty (TC QI) (Petroleum Storage Tank Divis ou rices is maintained by TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR R 4i. 9 G 8 +� -i C 9 B 9 VO •0. o . to i 9.5ni ,r 1n_ 66 38.",.461 NOOu j ICA `f This database returned 35 results for your area The TX-TCEQ ACR is a computer application that allows the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to use a single, centralized area to record common information, such as the company names, addresses, and telephone numbers of those the TCEQ regulates. It also contains additional IDs (permits, registrations, authorizations, etc) and their status. 7X Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.54211, -97.66661 Distance to site 1850 ft 10.35 mi SW Info URL http:7laspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii query_detail.disp_pmgmm facility?p_reglstr y_id=110037920364 EPA Identifier 110037920364 Primary Name MEADOW LAKE PARK NORTH TRAIL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Address 2901 SETTLEMENT ROAD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 NAICS Codes 713990 SIC Codes 1629 SIC Descriptions HEAVY CONSTRUCTION, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Recorded On 03 -FEB -09 NAICS Descriptions ALL OTHER AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION INDUSTRIES. Location 30.53999,-97.66195 Distance to site 2518 ft 10.48 mi S Info URL httpllaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fi! query_detail.disp_pmgmm_facility?p_registr y_id=110041334419 EPA Identifier 110041334419 Primary Name WILLIAMSON COUNTY ANNEX PRECINCT 1 Address 1801 OLD SETTLERS BLVD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786812169 SIC Codes 1542, 7389 SIC Descriptions BUSINESS SERVICES, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED, GENERAL CONTRACTORS -NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, OTHER THAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND WAREHOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 17 -AUG -10 Recorded On 15 -JUN -10 TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.54071, -97.65964 Distance to site 2569 ft / 0.49 mi BE Info URL b.spe.povlenviromi query htiplAaspu34656 Primary Name y_Id=1100_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registr 815 EPA Identifier 110034656815 Primary Name DON QUICK Address 1842 E OLD SETTLERS BLVD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Recorded On 17 -APR -08 Location 30.54447,-97.6724 Distance to site 2756 ft / 0.52 mi W Info URL http:llraspub.epa.govlenvirolril query_detail.disp_progmm_facility?p_mgistr y_id=110034196304 EPA Identifier 110034196304 Primary Name ROUND ROCK CHRISTIAN CHURCH Address 22 LAKE DR City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 26 -FEB -10 Recorded On 16 -APR -08 Location 30.54016,-97.66898 Distance to site 2842 ft / 0.54 mi SW Info URL httpYliaspub.epa.govlenviromi query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_mgistr y_id=110033683208 EPA Identifier 110033683208 Primary Name LUTHER PETERSON SUBDIVISION Address 3220 SUNRISE RD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 23 -FEB -10 Recorded On 01 -APR -08 TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.55083, -97.6719 Distance to site 2910 it / 0.55 mi NW Info URL htfpllaspub.spe.gov7envi�i_query_detail.disp_progmm_facility?p_mgistr y_id=110033681674 EPA Identifier 110033681674 Primary Name L & L CONSTRUCTION Address 18 INDIAN MEADOWS DR STE D City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 NAICS Codes 484121 SIC Codes 4213 SIC Descriptions TRUCKING, EXCEPT LOCAL Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 22 -FEB -10 Recorded On 01 -APR -08 NAICS Descriptions GENERAL FREIGHT TRUCKING, LONG-DISTANCE, TRUCKLOAD. Location 30.5506, -97.6722 Distance to site 2950 ft/ 0.56 mi NW Info URL http:/daspub.epa.gov/enviro7fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registr y_id=110033681692 EPA Identifier 110033681692 Primary Name LOT 3CC 11 INDIAN MEADOWS DRIVE ROUND ROCK GLEN SUBDIVISION Address LOT 3CC 11 INDIAN MEADOWS DR ROUND ROCK GLEN SUB City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 NAICS Codes 236220 SIC Codes 1541 SIC Descriptions GENERAL CONTRACTORS -INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND WAREHOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 11 -AUG -10 Recorded On 01 -APR -08 NAICS Descriptions COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. TX Commission of Environmental Quality A CR Location 30.53947,-97.66854 Distance to site 2984 It / 0.57 mi SW Info URL httpllraspub.epa..av/envi�i query_detail.disp_pmgram_facility?p_mgistr y_id=110034359717 EPA Identifier 110034359717 Primary Name MCSHANE CORPORATION SUNRISE APARTMENTS Address 2800 SUNRISE RD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-2540 SIC Codes 1522 SIC Descriptions GENERAL CONTRACTORS -RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, OTHER THAN Updated On SINGLE-FAMILY Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 20 -APR -D8 Recorded On 17 -APR -08 Location 30,55338.-97.66952 Distance to site 3002 ft/0.57 mi NW Info URL http:/1taspub.epa.gov/enviro1 i_ query_detaiLdisp_progrem_facility?p_registr y_id=110005183345 EPA Identifier 110005183345 Primary Name ROADRUNNER MOBIL OIL & LUBE PLUS Address 3606 CHEYENNE ST City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-1323 Programs RCRAINFO, TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER, TRANSPORTER Updated On 09 -AUG -10 Recorded On 01 -MAR -00 7X Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.5393,-97.66849 Distance to site 3032 tt / 0.57 mi SW Info URL http:/laspub.epe.gov/enviro/Ni query_detail.disp_program_facility7p_mgistr y_rd=110033700966 EPA Identifier 110033700966 Primary Name FAUGHT DENTAL Address 2708 SUNRISE RD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 18 -MAR -10 Recorded On 01 -APR -08 Location 30.54445,-97.67366 Distance to site 3138 It / 0.59 mi W Info URL httpYf1aspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_detail.disp_program facility7p_mgistr y_id=110035146277 EPA Identifier 110035146277 Primary Name THE HITTING ZONE Address 3301 SUNRISE RD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786642552 NAICS Codes 713940 SIC Codes 7991 SIC Descriptions PHYSICAL FITNESS FACILITIES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Recorded On 19 -APR -08 NAICS Descriptions FITNESS AND RECREATIONAL SPORTS CENTERS. TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.53891, -97.66837 Distance to site 3142 ft t 0.6 mi SW Info URL http.&aspub.epa.gov/enviro1V_query_detail.disp—progml facility?p_mgistr y_id=110038488605 EPA Identifier 110038488605 Primary Name SWEET HOME BAPTIST CHURCH Address 3200 & 3201 SUNRISE ROAD city ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-9416 NAICS Codes 813110 SIC Codes 1542, 8661 SIC Descriptions GENERAL CONTRACTORS -NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, OTHER THAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND WAREHOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Recorded On 27 -MAY -09 NAICS Descriptions RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS. Location 30.54512,-97.67393 Distance to site 3170 ft / 0.6 mi W Info URL httpJ11aspub.epa.gov/envirom! query_detail.disp_pmgrem facility?p_mgistr y_id=110040158940 EPA Identi0er 110040158940 Primary Name LOT 8C ROUND ROCK GLEN STORAGE FACILITIES Address 3501 SUNRISE RD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Recorded On 30 -DEC -09 TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.53878,-97.66889 Distance to site 3259 it / 0.62 mi SW Info URL http:/Aaspub.epa.gov/envi�i query_detail.disp_progrem_/acility9p_mgistr y_id=110035184797 EPA Identifier 110035184797 Primary Name WAG A BAG 7 Address 1490 OLD SETTLERS BLVD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664-2539 NAICS Codes 447110 SIC Codes 5411,5541 SIC Descriptions GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS, GROCERY STORES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 07 -APR -09 Recorded On 19 -APR -08 NAICS Descriptions GASOLINE STATIONS WITH CONVENIENCE STORES. Location 30.5381,-97.66814 Distance to site 3382 R/0.64 mi SW Info URL http:/Aa ub.eps.gov/enviroAii query_detail.disp_progmm_faci8ty7p_registr y_id=110034999090 EPA Identifier 110034999090 Primary Name WAG -A -BAG 14 Address 2499 SUNRISE RD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786642340 NAICS Codes 447110 SIC Codes 5411 SIC Descriptions GROCERY STORES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 07 -APR -09 Recorded On 18 -APR -08 NAICS Descriptions GASOLINE STATIONS WITH CONVENIENCE STORES. TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.55447, -97.65738 Distance to site 3531 ft 10.67 mi NE Info URL http:/laspub.epe.gov/envirolfti_query_detail.disp_progrsm_facilfty?p_mgistr y_id=110021830562 EPA Identifier 110021830562 Primary Name HOPEWELL MIDDLE SCHOOL PORTABLE ADDITION Address 1535 GULF WAY City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-1405 SIC Codes 1542,8211 SIC Descriptions ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS, GENERAL SIC Descriptions CONTRACTORS -NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, OTHER THAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND WAREHOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 16 -DEC -10 Recorded On 20 -MAY -05 Location 30.53835,-97.67031 Distance to site 3622 ft 10.69 mi SW Info URL hHp:/88spub.epa.gov/enviroff1 query_detail.disp_program facility?p_registr y_id=110033782413 EPA Identifier 110033782413 Primary Name GREEN SQUARE OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS Address 850 FT S OF OLD SETTLERS BLVD FM 3406 ON THE E SID City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 NAICS Codes 236220 SIC Codes 1542 SIC Descriptions GENERAL CONTRACTORS -NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, OTHER THAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND WAREHOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 29 -JAN -09 Recorded On 01 -APR -08 NAICS Descriptions COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.53833, -97.67039 Distance to site 3641 ft 10.69 mi SW Info URL http:/1Zaspub.epa.gov/envkn0 query_detail.dispyrogmiT facility?p_mgistr y_id=110034457790 EPA Identifier 110034457790 Primary Name OLD SETTLERS MARKET Address 1400 OLD SETTLERS BLVD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664-2798 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Recorded On 17 -APR -08 Location 30.53833,-97.67039 Distance to site 3641 it 10.69 mi SW Info URL http:/laspub.epa.gov/envim/8i query_detail.disp_pmgmm_facNty?p_registr y_id=110034323328 EPA Identifier 110034323328 Primary Name CLEENERZ Address 1400 E OLD SETTLERS BLVD STE 300 City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786642862 NAICS Codes 812320 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 30 -JAN -09 Recorded On 17 -APR -08 NAICS Descriptions DRYCLEANING AND LAUNDRY SERVICES (EXCEPT COIN- OPERATED). TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.54277,-97.65294 Distance to site 3757 ft / 0.71 mi E Info URL httpller%t b.epa.gov/envi�i query_detai.dispLprogram facility7p registr y_id=110037207590 EPA Identifier 110037207590 Primary Name BLUFFS LANDING SENIOR VILALGE Address 2200 OLD SETTLERS BLVD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786641909 SIC Codes 1542 SIC Descriptions GENERAL CONTRACTORS -NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, OTHER SIC Descriptions THAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND WAREHOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Recorded On 17-NOV-08 Location 30.54972,-97.67548 Distance to site 3775 ft/ 0.72 mi W Info URL http:lha ub.epe.yov/envira i query_detail.disp_pregrem_faciiity7p_registr y_1d=1137897096 EPA Identifier 110037897096 Primary Name SUPERIOR CLEAN CAN Address 81NDIAN MEADOWS DR City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-9419 NAICS Codes 532490 SIC Codes 7359 SIC Descriptions EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND LEASING, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 20 -MAY -11 Recorded On 02 -FEB -09 NAICS Descriptions OTHER COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND LEASING. TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.54969,-97.67556 Distance to site 3795 ft/0.72 miW Info URL http:/laspub.epa.govlenvirolrii query program facility?p_registr _detail.disp_ _ y_id=110034217835 EPA Identifier 110034217835 Primary Name STEVE OATES RESIDENCE Address 5 INDIAN MEADOWS DR City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 07 -APR -10 Recorded On 16 -APR -08 Location 30.5362,-97.66795 Distance to site 4013 It 10.76 miS Info URL http:/fiaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_detaildisp_pmgram_facility?p_rsgtstr y_id=110037539134 EPA Identifier 110037539134 Primary Name SUNRISE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH Address SW CORNER OF SUNRISE RD AND DAVID CURRY DR City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 NAICS Codes 813110 SIC Codes 8661 SIC Descriptions RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 08 -APR -09 Recorded On 24 -DEC -08 NAICS Descriptions RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS. TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.55132,-97.67636 Distance to site 4238 It / 0.8 mi W Info URL http:/paspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_detail .disp_program_racility?p_registr y_ld=110033224814 EPA Identifier 110033224614 Primary Name BUENO AUSTIN NO3 Address 4301 SUNRISE ROAD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 NAICS Codes 722110, 722211 SIC Codes 1542,5812 SIC Descriptions EATING PLACES, GENERAL CONTRACTORS -NONRESIDENTIAL Program Interests BUILDINGS, OTHER THAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND Recorded On WAREHOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 17 -FEB -10 Recorded On 12 -MAR -08 NAICS Descriptions FULL-SERVICE RESTAURANTS., LIMITED -SERVICE RESTAURANTS. Location 30.55412,-97.67471 Distance to site 4328 It 10.82 mi NW Info URL http:/laspub.epa.gov/enviraf/i query_detail.dispyregrem_facillty?p_registr y_id=110034330141 EPA Identifier 110034330141 Primary Name EAGLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION Address 300 EAGLES NEST ST City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 SIC Codes 1521 SIC Descriptions GENERAL CONTRACTORS -SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Recorded On 17 -APR -08 TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.55833,-97.66666 Distance to site 4341 R / 0.82 mi N Info URL http./Aaspub.epa.gov/enviroKi query_detail.disp_pmgma_faciliWp_mgistr y_id=1100342018822 EPA Identifier 110034201922 Primary Name EAGLE RIDGE SECTION NINE DRAINAGE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Address CHANNEL UPSTREAM OF SETTLEMENT DR @ LAKESIDE DR City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 24 -JAN -12 Recorded On 16 -APR -08 Location 30.54333,-97.65028 Distance to site 4483 R / 0.85 mi E Info URL http:/laspub.epa.gov/envi�i query_detail.disp_pmgram_facility9p_mgistr y_id=110039088876 EPA Identifier 110039088876 Primary Name FM 1460 Address FROM 0.36 MILES NORTH OF OLD SETTLERS BOULEVARD TO City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665 SIC Codes 1611 SIC Descriptions HIGHWAY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION, EXCEPT ELEVATED HIGHWAYS Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Recorded On 07 -AUG -09 TX Commission of Environmental Quality A CR Location 30.54372, -97.6499 Distance to site 4562 ft 10.86 mi E Info URL http:1f1aspub.epa.gov1anviroffii_query_detail.disp_progrem_facility?p_mgistr Zipcode y_id=110039100558 EPA Identifier 110039100558 Primary Name TXDOT 2211-02-015 FM 1460 Address FM 1460 FROM .358 MILES N. OF OLD SETTLERS BLVD. T City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78664 SIC Codes 1611 SIC Descriptions HIGHWAY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION, EXCEPT ELEVATED HIGHWAYS Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 11 -AUG -10 Recorded On 07 -AUG -09 Location 30.5528, -97.67692 Distance to site 4635 ft 10.88 mi NW Info URL hitp:/8aspub.epa.gov/envirolVi_query_detail.dispyrogmrrLfacilNy?p_mgistr Zipcode y_id=110038206839 EPA Identifier 110038206839 Primary Name TERRAVISTA Q MART Address 4410 SUNRISE RD City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-1257 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 02 -MAR -10 Recorded On 08 -APR -09 TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.5528, -97.67692 Distance to site 4635 ft / 0.88 mi NW Info URL http://iaspub.epa.gov/enviroAii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registr Zipcode y_id=110034771389 EPA Identifier 110034771389 Primary Name NORTHWEST PETROLEUM 0711 Address 4410 SUNRISE DR City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-1257 SIC Codes 5541,6519,6552 SIC Descriptions GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS, LAND SUBDIVIDERS AND DEVELOPERS, EXCEPT CEMETERIES, LESSORS OF REAL PROPERTY, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED Programs TX-TCEO ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 23 -DEC -08 Recorded On 17 -APR -08 Location 30.54752,-97.67904 Distance to site 4734 ft / 0.9 mi W Info URL http:/liaspub.epa.gov/envlro/fii_query_detaildisp_program_facility?p_mgistr Zipcode y_1d=110034677140 EPA Identifier 110034877140 Primary Name RRISD FAST TRANSPORTATION FACILITY Address 921 LUTHER PETERSON PLACE City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-1312 SIC Codes 1542 SIC Descriptions GENERAL CONTRACTORS -NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, OTHER THAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND WAREHOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 30JAN-09 Recorded On 18 -APR -08 TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.54741,-97.67957 Distance to site 4897 R / 0.93 mi W Info URL htip.,IIaspub.epa.gov/enviroMi query_detail.disp_progma_facility7p_mgistr y_id=110034196279 EPA Identifier 110034196279 Primary Name ROUND ROCK ISD OPPORTUNITY CENTER Address 931 LUTHER PETERSON City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-1312 NAICS Codes 611110 SIC Codes 8211 SIC Descriptions ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 22 -MAR -10 Recorded On 16 -APR -08 NAICS Descriptions ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS. Location 30.5472, -97.68022 Distance to site 5099 it 10.97 mi W Info URL hitp:/daspub.epa.gov/envim/fii_query_detail.dispymgmrrLfacility2p_registr y_id=110034959560 EPA Identifier 110034959560 Primary Name TRANSPORTATION EAST FACILITY Address 921 LUTHER PETERSON City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786641312 Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 26JAN-09 Recorded On 18 -APR -08 TX Commission of Environmental Quality ACR Location 30.5472,-97.68022 Distance to site 5099 R/ 0.97 mi W Info URL http.Maspub.epa.gov/enviro1 i_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registr Zipcode y_id=110034514988 EPA Identifier 110034514988 Primary Name CITY OF ROUND ROCK 8 ROUND ROCK ISD Address 921 LUTHER PETERSON City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 78665-1312 SIC Codes 1542 SIC Descriptions GENERAL CONTRACTORS -NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, OTHER Address THAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND WAREHOUSES Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 20 -MAY -09 Recorded On 17 -APR -08 Location 30.5445,-97.64745 Distance to site 5262 ft 11 mi E Info URL http:/laspub.epe.gov/enviro/fii_query_detail.disp_progmm_facility?p_registr y_id=110033261360 EPA Identifier 110033261360 Primary Name AUTOCRAFTERS COLLISION REPAIR Address 2501 KIPHEN RD BLDG 1 City ROUND ROCK County WILLIAMSON State TX Zipcode 786649338 NAICS Codes 811121 SIC Codes 7532 SIC Descriptions TOP, BODY, AND UPHOLSTERY REPAIR SHOPS AND PAINT SHOPS Programs TX-TCEQ ACR Program Interests STATE MASTER Updated On 10-NOV-08 Recorded On 12 -MAR -08 NAICS Descriptions AUTOMOTIVE BODY, PAINT, AND INTERIOR REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE. TX Drycleaners 1 t 1 _ f�. 39. M y" - .66491 v.h i This database returned 2 results for your area. 1n. Texas Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 337, requires all dry cleaning drop stations and facilities in Texas to register with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and implement new performance standards at their facilities as appropriate. Environmental contamination at a dry cleaner site can occur from spills and leaks of solvent. The most common dry cleaning solvent can penetrate concrete and can sink through floor cracks since it is heavier then water. In addition, many dry cleaners historically disposed of wastes containing solvent by pouring wastewater into a sanitary sewer, throwing spent filters and sludge into the trash, or dumping wastewater on the ground near their facility. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, a federal law passed in 1980 and amended in 1984 increased regulation of hazardous waste and unsafe practices are no longer allowed. However, at some dry cleaner facilities, past disposal and management practices have resulted in contamination of soil and groundwater to an extent that requires cleanup. TX Drycleaners Location 30.53881, -97.66868 Distance to site 3218 ft / 0.61 mi SW Site Name CLEENERZ Registration Number 105231963 Site Type FACILITY REGISTRATION Registration Status ACTIVE Site Operation ACTIVE Role Type BILLING Address 1400 E OLD SETTLERS BLVD STE 3D0 County WILLIAMSON Owner Name M & K INDUSTRIES INC Fiscal Year FY2008 PhyslD 3004696 LGL ID 3021031 Address ROUND ROCK Address TX Address 2862 Zip Code 78664 Location 30.53881, -97.66868 Distance to site 32188/0.61 mi SW Site Name CLEENERZ Registration Number 105231963 Site Type FACILITY REGISTRATION Registration Status ACTIVE Site Operation ACTIVE Role Type OWN Address 1400 E OLD SETTLERS BLVD STE 300 County WILLIAMSON Owner Name M & K INDUSTRIES INC Fiscal Year FY2008 PhyslD 3004696 LGL ID 3021031 Address ROUND ROCK Address TX Address 2862 Zip Code 78664 TX State Superfund Registry This database returned no results for your area. The State Superfund registry, established by the 69th Texas Legislature in 1985 and administered by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, lists those abandoned or inactive sites that have serous contamination but do not qualify for the federal program, and therefore are cleaned up under the state program. The state must comply with federal guidelines in administering the state Superfund program, but EPA approval of state Superfund actions is not required. TX Brownfields This database returned no results for your area. Many former industrial properties lie dormant or underutilized due to liability associated with real or perceived contamination. These properties are broadly referred to as brownfields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ), in close partnership with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other federal, state, and local redevelopment agencies, and stakeholders, is facilitating cleanup, transferability, and revitalization of brownfields through the development of regulatory, tax, and technical assistance tools. TX Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites This database returned no results for your area. The Texas Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) provides administrative, technical, and legal incentives to encourage the cleanup of contaminated sites in Texas. Since all non -responsible parties, including future lenders and landowner, receive protection from liability to the state of Texas for cleanup of sites under the VCP, most of the constraints for completing real estate transactions at those sites are eliminated. As a result, many unused or under used properties may be restored to economically productive or community beneficial use. Also under the VCP, site cleanups follow a streamlined approach to reduce future human and environmental risk to safe levels. TX Innocent Owner Program This database returned no results for your area. Texas instituted the Innocent Owner/Operator Program(IOP) to mitigate the risks of environmental contamination to innocent parties. The Texas IOP created by House Bill 2776 of the 75th Legislature, provides a certificate to an innocent owner or operator if their property is contaminated as a result of a release or migration of contaminants from a source or sources not located on the property, and they did not cause or contribute to the source or sources of contamination. Like the Texas Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP), the IOP can be used as a redevelopment tool or as a tool to add value to a contaminated property by providing an Innocent Owner/Operator Certificate (IOC). However, unlike the VCP release of liability, IOCs are not transferable to future owners/operators. Future innocent owners or operators are eligible to enter the IOP and may receive an IOC only after they become an owner or operator of the site. TX Landfills This database returned no results for your area. The Solid Waste Landfill List (SWLF) database is Provided and maintained by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and consists of open solid waste disposal facilities and transfer stations. cVPRE55 vM .i , G,GL'r Cess N I N0 ZE°S N N SANtBE!ri LUTHE0. PETERS PPLpTE OLSO'J' y W'ES W+PLANTATtON E SERJ1cE ERVlcE mP y li PLOIdP w 0HA. S JF O�FRG EFEREti •;'-I/`� 1 " Pad F KOryVryF ryFry F, I D l Al K R ( e z 9 1 y r J y F,P 2 APOLLG ,� WOO° OSE O \ A OOUNTRIP ,GP r4 J r ER FARMS f � 3 Pp�M,ROGEa r �A TEIJI NP c0 _D s P 9 < v, v cHSNO`3` \ y 6P LAVTANAm URO f 00 S"'000 r BMHSS'U 0NSTnEF-SRt\SS�PpG\EEL0.P. 5c 11OUSTaL \\N PNRRtEFNm Pa NiP'�O0yF00P�0 OFNNI I p(F 'XAO)EO j zIHGAN pT BAVAND V:PAIMA11 .I L CK �PAR, PL ATEU VI ws C FFA°O S i O O a LE03ETTER y SUNBET y s G.JISTA NU 9N b �.O GPSEY - AUGERS@L SqP iBERT N 0 n cm + J n0 O$ERV1C �l R q NP T' Q jpnC a Ga .x? Fa RAeelr °dN <�. ,.s.. (�S NAS W YMITF.WING �0.�•aM' J .. Y G LOG 0 �aRFPLLSe .•ST W(RLtn0 ?O JF O ••\e'Jy �Gcs� [� 1•_GR�E�V�1PR ,� , L N m z y�'RCF. O P n i Ow V SP � Z y2PG , inT�s � FFRNCALE < BUFFALO C • QP v: Ra G. IS SCHo Ly D e V o gm m ea�� 2PC�y�GG j `Y9CCABon\ �Q [y��+p�,,'y� •e �IaP 2 y O h �* \,, G0 C,� FSS ♦ O�,N �nPPG�� A ^,'F o0 %� S O 2P2- �9•.k O p0PRt1N cGE°R \ PO • SOap551NG BERV!CE u J1GE NISTER OPNOE. Map Information SENNA A OCensus Tract Boundary 1 Block Group Boundary SN nrsn as. 11\ / City Limits �LMI Target Area Worksheet for Preparing 24 CFR §58.5 Statutory Checklist ]Optional Tool] 1. §58.5(a) Historical Properties 136 CFR Part 8001 Historic Properties a. Does the project include the type of activity that would have the potential to affect historic properties such as acquisition, demolition, disposition, ground disturbance, new construction or rehabilitation? ® Yes ❑ No Project scope of work is minor home repair/rehab. If Yes, continue. If No, the project is not the type of activity that has the potential to affect historic properties. Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Do the RE and State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) have a Programmatic Agreement (PA) that does not require consultation for this type of activity? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes, document compliance with the PA. Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. C. Is the project located within or directly adjacent to a historic district? ❑ Yes ® No d. Is the structure or surrounding structures listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (e.g. greater than 45 years old)? ❑ Yes ® No e. Were any properties of historical, architectural, religious or cultural significance identified in the project's Area of Potential Effect (APE)? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes to any of the questions above, continue. If No to all of the questions above, the project will not affect historic properties. A concurrence from the SHPO that "no historic properties will be affected" is required. Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See letter from SHPO allowing project to See clearance from State Historic Preservation Office. 22 Have you consulted with the SHPO to determine whether the project will have "No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties?" ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, consultation with the SHPO is required. g. Does the SHPO concurrence letter received for this project require mitigation or have conditions? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. h. Have the SHPO and RE agreed on required mitigation or conditions? ❑ Yes ❑No If Yes, include mitigation requirements and/or conditions from the SHPO in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue with consultation until resolved. Historic properties of relWous and cultural sianificance to tribes and Native Hawaiian omanizations Does the project include the types of activities such as those listed below that have the potential to affect historic properties of religious and cultural significance to tribes? • Ground disturbance (digging); • New construction in undeveloped natural areas; • Incongruent visual changes — impairment of the vista or viewshed from an observation point in the natural landscape; • Incongruent audible changes — increase in noise levels above an acceptable standard in areas known for their quiet, contemplative experience; • Incongruent atmospheric changes — introduction of lights that create skyglow in an area with a dark night sky; • Work on a building with significant tribal association; • Transfer, lease or sale of a historic property of religious and cultural significance. ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, tribal consultation is not required. 23 j. Does HUD's Tribal Directory Assessment Tool indicate that tribes have an interest in the location where the project is sited? (http://e2is.hud.gov/tdat/Tribal.asnxl ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, contact federally recognized tribe(s) and invite consultation. Continue. If No, document the result in the ERR Tribal consultation is not required. k. Did the tribe(s) respond that they want to be a consulting party? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, (no response within 30 days or responded that they do not wish to consult), document response or lack of response in ERR. Further consultation is not required. After consulting with the tribe(s) and discussing the project, were any properties of religious or cultural significance to the tribe(s) identified in the project's APE? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, notify tribe(s) and other consulting parties of your finding of "No Historic Properties Affected." Tribe(s) has 30 days to object to a finding. in. After consulting with the tribe(s), will the project have an adverse effect on properties of religious or cultural significance to the tribe(s)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, consult with tribe(s) and other consulting parties to resolve adverse effects, including considering alternatives and mitigation measures that would avoid or minimize adverse effects. If No, notify tribe(s) and other consulting parties of your finding of "No Adverse Effects." Tribe(s) has 30 days to object to a finding. n. Were any objections to a finding received from a consulting tribe? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue with consultation until resolved. If No, consultation is complete. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Correspondence with SHPO/THPO. How determination of "no potential to cause effects" to historic properties was made.) Information Resources: 24 National Register of Historic Places: htto://mho.focus.nos.¢ov/natregbome.do?Kga htype=natre hg ome National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers: htto://ncshoo.org/ Map of Currently Recognized THPO's: htto://www.nathpo.or, /�map.html Historic Preservation HUD Guidance: https://www.onegd.info/environmental-review/historic-preservation Historic Preservation Webinar: httos://www.onect)d.info/leaming-center/environmental-review-training/#Historic Preservation httt)s://www.onect)d.info/leaning-center/environmental-review-training/#Consulting with Indian Tribes Section 106 Agreements Database: httt)s://www.onecod.info/resource/3675/section-106-agreement-database/ 2. §58.5(6) (1) Floodplain Management [24 CFR Part 551 a. Does the project involve minor repairs or improvements on one to four family properties that do not meet the threshold for "substantial improvement" of §55.2(b)(8), i.e., the cost does not equal or exceed 50% of the market value of the structure before improvement or repair started, before damage occurred? M Yes ❑ No Project is minor home repair. See FEMA map attached. b. Does the project involve the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of and accessibility to elderly and persons with disabilities? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes to a or b, compliance with this section is complete. Murk box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. Is the project located within (or have an impact on) a 100 year floodplain (Zone A) or Coastal High Hazard (Zone V) identified by FEMA maps? ❑ Yes ❑ No d. Does the project involve a "critical action," per §55.2(b) (2) (i), located within a 500 year floodplain (Zone B) identified by FEMA maps? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes to (b) or (c), follow HUD's Floodplain Management Regulations 8-Step/5- Step decision-making process of §55.20 to comply with 24 CFR Part 55. The 8- Step/5-Step decision-making process must show that there are no practicable alternatives to locating the project in the floodplain, and if there are no alternatives, define measures to mitigate impacts to floodplains and location of the project in the floodplain. Completion of the 8 -Step decision-making process must 25 be completed before the completion of an EA per §55.10(a). See Attachment 2 for an example of the 8 -Step decision-making process. The 8 -step decision-making process must be included in the ERR and summarized in Part 55 and Part 58 public notices, as well as NOI/RROF and FONSI notices. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No to (b) and (c), compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Does the project involve a critical action in a coastal high hazard area or a floodway? ❑ Yes ❑ No If, Yes, HUD assistance may not be used for this project. Does the project involve a non-critical action which is not a functionally dependent use that is located in a floodway? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, HUD assistance may not be used for this project g. Does the project involve a non-critical action which is not a functionally dependent use that is located in a coastal high hazard area? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, project is allowed only if it is designed for a location in a coastal high hazard area and is processed under Section 55.20. Design requirements must be noted in Statutory Checklist and 8 -Step decision-making process. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (FEMA flood map used to make this fording with the project location marked on the map. Include the community name, map panel number and date of map. As applicable, §55.20 8 -Step decision-making process analysis. If FEMA has not published the appropriate flood map, the RE must make a fording based on best available data.) For more information see: Floodplain Management HUD Guidance: https•//www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/floodplain-mana eg ment/ FEMA Map Service Center: htto://www.msc.fema.eov 3. §58.5(6) (2) Wetlands Protection (E.O. 11990) a. Does the project involve new construction, land use conversion, or substantial improvements as defined in 24CFR Part 55? ❑ Yes ® No Wetlands maps attached. If Yes, continue. f! No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. 26 b. Is the project within or adjacent to or will it affect wetlands, marshes, wet meadows, mud flats or natural ponds per field observation and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps issued by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) or, if not available, National Soil Surveys by National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)? ❑ Yes ❑No C. Are there drainage ways, streams, rivers, or coastlines on or near the site? ❑ Yes ❑ No d. Are there ponds, marshes, bogs, swamps or other wetlands on or near the site? ❑ Yes ❑ No e. Does the project involve new construction and/or filling located within a wetland designated on a USFWS National Wetlands Inventory map? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes to any of b — e above, comply with wetlands decision-making process of 24 CFR §55.20. (Use proposed Part 55 published in the Federal Register January 2012 for wetland procedures). Continue. If No to all of b - e above, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Will the project require a permit from the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or will USFWS require wetland mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, ensure this is noted in Part 55 and Part 58 public notices. Include all mitigation measures and permit requirements in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (NWI Map with project location noted in reference to wetlands. §55.20 8/5 -Step decision-making process analysis for new construction and/or filling, and any permits received.) For more information see: Wetlands Protection HUD Guidance: https://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/wetlands-protectiod USFWS National Wetlands Inventory — Geospatial Wetlands Digital Data: http://www.FWS.Rov/wetlands/data/index.html Recognizing wetlands: 27 http://www.usace.mmv.mil/Portals/2/docs/civilworks/regulatory/techbio/rw bro.ndf 4. §58.5(c) Coastal Zone Management [Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, Sections 307(c) & (d)] a. Does the project involve new construction, land use conversion, or substantial improvements? ❑ Yes Z No Map of the Texas Coastal Zone Attached. If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is the project located within a Coastal Zone as defined in your state Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, the State CZM Agency must make a fording that the project is consistent with the approved State CZM Plan. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Map showing project in relation to the nearest Coastal Zone Management area. If applicable, State's findings.) For additional information see: Coastal Zone Management HUD Guidance: httns://www.onecod.info/environmental-review/coastal-zone-management/ States and Territories Working with NOAA on Ocean and Coastal Zone Management: http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/mystate/welcome.html Texas Coastal Zone Management Program: Texas Coastal Zone Boundary: htto://www.glo.texas.gov/what-we-do/caring-for-the-coast/ documents/landing-nage- Louisiana Office Louisiana Coastal Zone Boundary: http://dm.louisiana. gov/index.cfm?mdfpagebuilder&trop=home&pid=88 5. §58.5(d). Sole Source Aquifers [40 CFR Part 1491 Does the project involve new construction or land use conversion? ❑ Yes ® No See documentation on nearest Sole Source Aquifer. 28 If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is the project located within a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). designated sole source aquifer watershed area per EPA Ground Water Office? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, consult with the Water Management Division of EPA to design mitigation measures to avoid contaminating the aquifer and implement appropriate mitigation measures. Include mitigation measures in mitigation section of Statutory Checklist. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Map showing project in relation to the nearest Sole Source Aquifer.) For more information see: Sole Source Aquifer HUD Guidance: httos://www.onccpd.info/environmental-review/sole-source-aquifers/ Region 6 Sole Source Aquifers: http://www.epa. o� v/region6/water/swn/ssa/mans.htm 6. §55.5(e) Endangered Species (50 CFR Part 4021 a. Does the project involve the type of activities that are likely to have "no effect on endangered species, such as: • Demolition and construction or placement of a single family residence within a developed lot, and/or any loans or mortgages affiliated with such construction, demolition or placement provided they are not within 750 feet of habitat for federally -listed species or 300 feet of mapped wetlands, wildlife refuges, fish hatcheries, wildlife management areas, or related significant fish and wildlife resources? ❑ Yes N No • Rehabilitation or renovation activities associated with existing structures (e.g., houses, buildings), including additional structures attached to or associated with the primary structure, and/or any loans or mortgages affiliated with such rehabilitation or renovation? N Yes ❑ No • Acquisition of existing structures (e.g., houses, buildings), including additional structures attached to or associated with the primary structure, and/or any loans or mortgages affiliated with such acquisition. ❑ Yes N No • Purchase and placement of playground equipment within existing parks? ❑ Yes N No 29 • Resurfacing, repairing, or maintaining existing streets, sidewalks, curbs, trails, parking lots and/or any other existing paved surfaces where additional ground disturbance, outside of the existing surface is not necessary? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes to any of the above, the project is likely to have "No Effect" on federally protected species and critical habitat. Informal consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service (Services) is not necessary. The RE is required to make this finding and include a memorandum to the file supporting the finding (note that this fording should be made by the RE, and not by third party contractors and non -RE grant recipients). Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See memo from CDBG staff and Critical Habitat Map. If No to all of the above, continue. b. Has the US Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Services identified listed species or designated critical habitat in the county where the project is located? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yea, continue. If No, the project is likely to have "No Effect" on federally protected species and critical habitat. Informal consultation with the Services is not necessary. The RE is required to make this finding and include a memorandum to the file supporting the finding (note that this finding should be made by the RE, and not by third party contractors). Compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. C. Is the project located within 750 feet of habitat for federally -listed species or 300 feet of mapped wetlands, wildlife refuges, fish hatcheries, wildlife management areas, or related significant fish and wildlife resources? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, conduct special studies by a qualified professional to determine whether the project may affect the species or habitat to support a May Effect finding. If No, continue below d. Does the project constitute a major construction activity (a major Federal action that modifies the physical environment and would normally require the preparation of an EIS)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30 If Yes, formal consultation with the Services is required in accordance with procedural regulations contained in 50 CFR Part 402. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. If federally protected species or critical habitat have been identified within the project area, has a special study been conducted by a qualified professional to determine the effects of the project on each species and critical habitat? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, a special study should be conducted to determine the effects of the project on federally protected species and critical habitat. Continue. Has the RE made a determination based on professional findings that the project is "Not Likely to Adversely Affect' any federally protected (listed or proposed) threatened or endangered species (i.e., plants or animals, fish, or invertebrates), nor adversely modify critical habitats? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, Service's concurrence with findings is required. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. g. Has the RE determined based on professional findings that the project "May Affect" federally protected (listed or proposed) threatened or endangered species (i.e., plants or animals, fish, or invertebrates), or adversely modify critical habitats? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, formal consultation is required with the Services, in accordance with procedural regulations contained in 50 CFR Part 402, which mandates formal consultation in order to preserve the species. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, contact your FEO for assistance in determining impacts to federally protected species and critical habitat. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Memorandum to the file by the RE supporting the finding of "No Effect." Concurrence memo from one or both of the Services for a finding of "Not Likely to Adversely Affect." Biological Opinion from one or both of the Services for a finding of "May Affect.") For additional information see: (The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. as amended: particularly Section 7 (b) and (c). 50 CFR 402). ESA HUD Guidance: 31 his://www.orleod.info/environmental-review/endangered-species ESA HUD Webmar: hMs://www.onecvd.info/leamingcenter/environmental-review-training/#Protecting our Natural Resources USFWS ESA Species Search: htti)://www.FWS.goy/endangered/species/index.html NMFS ESA Species Search: htti)://www.ninfs.noaa.gov/vr/species/esa/ USFWS Critical Habitat Maps: htto://crithab.FW S.RoV/ NWS Critical Habitat Maps: httt)://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/Dr/species/criticalhabitat.htm Endangered Species Consultation Handbook: htto://www.mnfs.noaa.2ov/Dr/vdfs/laws/esa section? handbook.pdf 7. §58.5(f) Wild and Scenic Rivers [36 CFR Part 297] Does the project involve new construction, land use conversion, or substantial improvements? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes, continue. If No, comphance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See map of project site and nearest Wild and Scenic River and How Far Is It? information on distance to nearest Wild and Scenic River. b. Is the project is located within one (1) mile of a designated Wild & Scenic River, or river being studied as a potential component of the Wild & Scenic River system or an inventory river? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, determination from the National Park Service (NPS) must be obtained, with a finding that the project will not have a direct and adverse effect on the river nor invade or diminish values associated with such rivers. For NRI Rivers, consultation with NPS is recommended to identify and eliminate direct and adverse effects. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. H No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Maps noting project location and showing proximity to protected rivers. Relevant determinations or results of consultation) For further information see: 32 Wild and Scenic Rivers HUD Guidance: bgps://www.onect)d.info/enviromnental-review/wild-and-scenic-rivers/ HUD Wild and Scenic Rivers Webinar: bUs•//www.onecpd info/leamina-center/environmental-review-training/#Protecting our Natural Resources National Park Service: Designated Rivers htto://www.rivers.gov/may.nhi) Study Rivers hft:H/ .rivers.gov/study.ph�p /study.php National River Inventory (NRI) listed rivers: htto://www.nos.gov/ncre/orograms/rtca/nri/index.html 8. §58.5(g) Air Quality 140 CFR Parts 6, 51, 61 and 931 Does the project involve demolition or renovation of buildings likely to contain asbestos containing materials? ❑ Yes N No If Yes, ensure the project is in compliance with EPA's Asbestos regulations found at 40 CFR Part 61 (NESHAP) and all State and local regulations. Continue below. If No, continue. b. Does the project require and environmental assessment or environmental impact statement? ❑ Yes N No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with CAA State Implementation Plan factor is complete. Mark Box A on the Statutory checklist. Project site is located in Williamson County which is a not a non attainment area. Does the project involve five or more dwelling units, acquisition of undeveloped land, a change of land use, demolition, major rehabilitation, or new construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. d. Is the project located in a Non -Attainment area? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. 33 C. Has EPA or the State provided a written determination that the project will not exceed any of the de minimis emissions levels of all non -attainment and maintenance level pollutants or exceed the screening level established by the state or air quality management district? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Did EPA or the State provide a Letter of Consistency with the State Implementation Plan (SIP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, obtain letter of consistency showing that the project is consistent with the SIP. Compliance is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. g. Has EPA determined that the proposed activity is one that requires a permit under the SIP? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance is complete. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. It. Can project be brought into compliance through mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, list mitigation measures required to achieve conformance with SIP in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, Federal assistance may not be used at this location. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Letter of consistency with SIP, assessment of emissions, air permits received, mitigation measures taken, etc.) For further information see: Air Quality HDD Guidance: httns://www.onecmd.info/environmental-review/air-aualiri/ HUD Air Quality Webinar: 34 https://www.onecnd.info/leaminecenter/enviro=ental-review-trainine/#Clean Air Act Compliance The Green Book Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants: ho://www.ppa.2ov/oar/oaaos/greenbk Region 6 Air State Implementation Plans: hq://www.epa. og v/reeion6/6p&air/nd-1/sii).htm 9. §58.5(h) Farmlands Protection [7 CFR Part 658)] Does the project involve acquisition of undeveloped land, conversion of undeveloped land, new construction or site clearance? ❑ Yes ® No See zoning map. If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is project located in an area zoned to urban and/or residential uses as mapped by the Census Bureau? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. C. Does the project site include prime or unique farmland, or other farmland of statewide or local importance as identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (formerly the Soil Conservation Service? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, request evaluation of land type from the NRCS using Form AD -1006, and consider the resulting rating in deciding whether to approve the proposal, as well as mitigation measures (including measures to prevent adverse effects on adjacent farmlands). Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Include mitigation measures in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Zoning map with project location noted. Form AD -1006 from NRCS.) For additional information see: NRCS Soil Maps: 35 htti),//websoilsurve,v.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ Form AD -1006 and instructions: http,//www.nrcs.usda.gov/Intemet/FSE DOCUMENTS/stelordb1045394.odf Farmland Protection HUD Guidance: httos•//www onecod info/environmental-review/farmlands-protection/ HUD FPPA Webmar: httos,//www onecod info/leaming-center/environmental-review-training/#Protecting our Natural Resources Census Data Mapper: httD://ti2erweb.peo.census.gov/datamal)ver/map.html 10. §58.5() (1) Noise Abatement and Control [24 CFR Part 51111 a. Does the project involve a noise sensitive use such as a residential structure, school, hospital, nursing home, library, etc.? ® Yes ❑No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is the project located within: • 15 miles of a civilian or military airfield with more than 9,000 carrier operations annually; ❑ Yes ® No • 1000 feet of a major highway or busy road; ❑ Yes ® No • within 3000 feet of a railroad. ❑ Yes ® No If Yes to any the above, complete a noise calculation assessment. Use adopted DNL contours if the noise source is an airport Continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See map showing distance from project site to nearest railroad and major roadway. C. Do noise calculations or airport noise contour maps indicate noise levels above 65dB (outside)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If Yes, continue. d. If the answer to "c" above is "yes," does the project involve rehabilitation? ❑ Yes ❑ No 36 If Yes, noise attenuation measures are strongly encouraged for rehabilitation new construction to reduce noise levels to below 65dB. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. List all attenuation measures in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, continue. d. If the answer to "c" is yes, does the project involve new construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, Special Environmental Clearance is required (an Environmental Assessment). Noise attenuation measures are required for new construction to reduce noise levels to below 65dB. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. List all attenuation measures in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, Continue. e. Do noise calculations or airport noise contour maps indicate outdoor noise levels above 75dB? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance is completed with respect to steps a -d above. f. If noise levels are above 75 dB, does the project involve new construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, HUD assistance for the construction of new noise sensitive uses is generally prohibited for projects with unacceptable noise exposure (>75dB). An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required. Compliance cannot be achieved without either completion of an EIS or processing of an EIS waiver. If No, compliance in complete with respect to steps a -e above. g. If outdoor noise levels are> 75 dB and the project involves new construction, was an EIS waiver processed? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance is complete. Attach the EIS waiver, signed by the Certifying Officer. Mark box `B" of the Statutory Checklist and list all outdoor and indoor attenuation measures to reduce outdoor noise levels to 65 dB and indoor noise levels to 45 dB in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, proceed with preparation of an EIS or deny the project. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Maps with project location indicating distance from noise sources. DNL calculations and/or NAG worksheets.) 37 For more information see: HUD Noise Guidance: httns•//www onecod info/environmental-review/noise-abatement-and-control/ httn•//www hud eov/offices/cnd/envimnment/dnlcalculator cfm httv,//www.hud.gov/offices/gpd/envirolunent/miti2ation.cfm http,//Dortal.hud.gov/hudstracat/noiseCalcEntry.isp HUD Noise Webinar: htt�s�//www onecnd info/learning-center/environmental-review-training/#Noise Assessment Trainin¢ FAA: httv://www.faa.gov/aimorts/Dlwuiing capacity/nmas/reoorts/ Airport Contacts: htto://www.aimay.com/aiMgrts/ 11. §58.5(1) (1) Explosive and Flammable Operations [24 CFR 51C] Does the project involve development, construction, rehabilitation, modernization or land use conversion of a property intended for residential, institutional, recreational, commercial, or industrial use? ® Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Was a field observation performed by a qualified professional which documents there are above ground storage tanks within line of site of the project? ® Yes ❑ No C. Is the project site within I mile of current or planned stationary aboveground storage tanks of more than 100 gallon capacity, containing common liquid industrial fuels OR of any capacity, containing hazardous liquids or gases, that are not liquid industrial fuels? ❑ Yes ® No d. Are industrial facilities handling explosive or fire -prone materials such as liquid propane, gasoline or other storage tanks adjacent to or visible from the project site? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes to any of b — d above, use HUD Hazards Guide to calculate an Acceptable Separation Distance to comply with 24 CFR Part 51, Subpart C. Continue. If No to all of b — d above, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. See email from Laura Myers HUD Rep. 38 e. Is the project located at an Acceptable Separation Distance from any above- ground explosive or flammable fuels or chemicals containers as calculated above? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, continue. Can mitigation measures, such as construction of a barrier of adequate size and strength, reduce the blast overpressure or thermal radiation hazard to protect the project (per 24 CFR §51.205)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. List all mitigation measures in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. If No, HUD assistance cannot be used for this project. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Maps with project location noted showing distance from explosives and flammable operations. ASD calculations/worksheet.) For additional information see: HUD Guidance on Siting Projects near Explosive and Flammable Facilities: https://www.onecod.info/environmental-review/explosive-and-flammable-facilities/ HUD Explosives Webinar: httns://"uw.onecnd.info/leaming-center/environmental-review-training/#Ameotable Separation Distance (ASD) Training Acceptable Separation Distance Guidebook: httt)s://www.onecod.info/resource/2762/acceptable- separation-distance-guidebook/ Barrier Design Guidance for HUD Assisted Project Near Hazardous Facilities: https://www.onecpd.info/resource/2763fbarrier-design-guidance-for-hud-assisted-projects-near- hazardous-facil/ 12. §58.5(i) (1) Airport Hazards [24 CFR 511)] a. Will the project use HUD assistance, subsidy or insurance for construction; land development; community development or redevelopment; substantial modernization and rehabilitation which prolongs the physical or economic life of existing facilities; provide facilities and services which make land available for construction; change the use of a facility; increase the unit density or number of people at the site? ❑ Yes ® No Project scope of work does not meet definition of substantial improvements or rehab. See list of nearest military and civilian airports. If Yes, continue. 39 If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Is the property within 5,000 feet of a civilian airport, the Runway Clear Zone (RCZ)? ❑ Yes ❑ No C. Is the project is within 15,000 feet of a military airfield, the Clear Zone (CZ) or Accident Potential Zone (APZ)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No to both of the above questions, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. d. If the project is within 5, 000 feet of the end of a civilian airport runway, did the Airport Operator provide a written determination that the project is not now and will not be 10 years from now, located 2,500 feet from the end of the civilian runway in a runway clear zone? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance is complete. Mark Box "A" on the Statutory Checklist and attach the Airport Operator's written determination. If No, continue. e. If the project is within 15,000 feet of a military airfield did the airfield operator provide a written determination that the project is not currently located in an CZIAPZ and future expansion will not place the property in a CZ/APZ? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance is complete. Mark Box "A" on the Statutory Checklist and attach the Airport Operator's written determination. If No, continue. d. If the project is or will be in a RCZ/CZ will the project be frequently used or occupied by people? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, HUD funds may not be used for this project. 40 If No, continue. e. If the project will not frequently be used by people, has the airport operator provided a written statement that there are no plans to purchase the land involved with such facilities as part of an RCZ/CZ acquisition program? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, attach copy of written assurance from airport operator. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, HUD foods may not be used for this project. If the project is located in a military airfield APZ, is the project consistent with the Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Accident Potential Zones (32 CFR Part 256, DOD Instruction 4165.57). ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, attach copy of written assurance from airport operator. Mark box `B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, HUD funds may not be used for this project. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Map with project location noted showing the distance from civilian airports and/or military airfields. Written confirmation from airport operating stating whether or not project is located in a RCZ, CZ or APZ. Written assurance from airport operator on purchase of property.) For further information see: Airport Information: http://www.aimay.com/airports/ Airport Hazards HUD Guidance: httt)s://www.oneci3d.info/environmental-review/airport-hazard 41 13. §58.5(1) (2) Contamination and Toxic Substances Government Records Search a. Is the property located within the search distances of any of the types of environmental contamination sources? If the project is located within any of the minimum search distances above, then the RE must further evaluate to determine if there has been a release or there is a threat of release to the subject property. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review to support any conclusion that the site of concern is not a threat. 42 ASTM 1527-13 Recommended Minimum Search Standard Environmental Record Sources Distance mi Yes No Federal Delisted NPL Site List 0.5 Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS List 0.5 ❑ Federal CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned RAP Site List 0.5 ❑ Federal RCRA Non-CORRACTS Treatment, Storme and Dis sal D Facilities List 0.5 ❑ State- and Tribal -Equivalent CERCLIS 0.5 11 9 State and Tribal Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal Site Lists 0.5 State and Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Lists 0.5 rl State and Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites 0.5 ❑ State and Trial Brownfield Sites 0.5 ❑ Federal National Priorities List L 1 ❑ Federal RCRA Correction Action (CORRACTS) Facilities List 1 State- and Tribal -Equivalent NPL 1 ❑ Federal Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registries Property Only ❑ State and Tribal Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registries Property Only Federal Emergency Response and Notification System(ERNS) List Property Only Property/Adjoining Federal RCRA Generators List Properties 11 Property/Adjoining State and Tribal Registered Storage Tank Lists Properties If the project is located within any of the minimum search distances above, then the RE must further evaluate to determine if there has been a release or there is a threat of release to the subject property. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review to support any conclusion that the site of concern is not a threat. 42 If a release or threat of release cannot be ruled out, then services of a qualified environmental professional is necessary to further evaluate potential for site contamination. Recommend an ASTM 1527-13 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I). Prior Uses of the Property b. Has the subject property, adjacent property, or adjoining property ever been used for any of the following types of uses? If the evaluation of previous uses results in a yes answer to any of the above, the services of a qualified environmental professional is necessary to rule out site contamination. An ASTM 1527-13 Phase I is recommended. If the evaluation of previous uses does not identify previous uses of concern, attach supporting documentation for the conclusion to the environmental review. Field Site Visit C. Did a visual inspection of the site show the following? Yes No Distressed vegetation Yes No Gas Station E Vehicle Repair Shop ❑ E Car Dealership Auto Garage rl E Depot M E Commeroial Priming Fazility 0 E Industrial or commercial warehouses ❑ ® Dry Cleaners ❑ E Photo Developing Laboratory ❑ Hospital Junkvard or landfill Agncultural/Farming Operations ❑ E Tam 0"0 Livestock Operations ❑ E If the evaluation of previous uses results in a yes answer to any of the above, the services of a qualified environmental professional is necessary to rule out site contamination. An ASTM 1527-13 Phase I is recommended. If the evaluation of previous uses does not identify previous uses of concern, attach supporting documentation for the conclusion to the environmental review. Field Site Visit C. Did a visual inspection of the site show the following? 43 Yes No Distressed vegetation E Vent or Fill Pipes❑ E Storage Oil Tanks or Questionable Containers E Pits, Ponds or L oohs Stained Soil or Pavement other than water stains E Pungent, Foul or Noxious Odors ❑ 43 d. Does the project have an underground storage tank other than a residential fuel tank, or known or suspected to be contaminated by toxic chemicals or radioactive materials? ❑ Yes ® No Is the project site near an industry or commercial facility disposing of chemicals or hazardous wastes? ❑ Yes ® No Could a nearby source of toxic, hazardous or radioactive substances affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property? ❑ Yes or ® No If the site visit identifies a "Yes" answer to any of the above, a qualified environmental professional must undertake investigations necessary to ensure that the project is free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances such that there is no hazard which could affect the health and safety of occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. Continue. Results of ASTM Site Contamination Reviews g. Was an ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report completed for this project? (Strongly recommend an Phase I ESA for land acquisition, new construction, reconstruction or substantial rehabilitation). ❑ Yes ❑ No h. Did a Phase I, or equivalent evaluation, identify the potential for site contamination? [The RE must independently evaluate the Phase I and not rely entirely on the conclusions of whether or not there is a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC). Phase I's do not always appropriately identify RECs.] ❑ Yes ❑ No If there is the potential for site contamination, was an ASTM Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Completed that documented contamination? ❑ Yes or ❑ No 44 Yes I No Dumped Material or Soil, Mounds of Dirt, Rubble, Fill, etc. 1 ❑ 1 0 d. Does the project have an underground storage tank other than a residential fuel tank, or known or suspected to be contaminated by toxic chemicals or radioactive materials? ❑ Yes ® No Is the project site near an industry or commercial facility disposing of chemicals or hazardous wastes? ❑ Yes ® No Could a nearby source of toxic, hazardous or radioactive substances affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property? ❑ Yes or ® No If the site visit identifies a "Yes" answer to any of the above, a qualified environmental professional must undertake investigations necessary to ensure that the project is free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances such that there is no hazard which could affect the health and safety of occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. Continue. Results of ASTM Site Contamination Reviews g. Was an ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report completed for this project? (Strongly recommend an Phase I ESA for land acquisition, new construction, reconstruction or substantial rehabilitation). ❑ Yes ❑ No h. Did a Phase I, or equivalent evaluation, identify the potential for site contamination? [The RE must independently evaluate the Phase I and not rely entirely on the conclusions of whether or not there is a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC). Phase I's do not always appropriately identify RECs.] ❑ Yes ❑ No If there is the potential for site contamination, was an ASTM Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Completed that documented contamination? ❑ Yes or ❑ No 44 j. Did results of the Phase I or Phase II identify the need to mitigate the environmental condition by removing, stabilizing or encapsulating the toxic substances in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate Federal, state or local oversight agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No k. If the project site requires remediation, does the RE have the following documentation? If Yes, then, compliance is complete. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review. Ensure that all mitigation measures are identified in the environmental review and that there is a mechanism for conveying requirements in agreements and awards. Mark Box B on the Statutory Checklist for this Authority. Attach all supporting documentation. If No, HUD cannot provide assistance for the project at this site. j. If the site requires remediation, and the property owner intends to complete the remediation prior to transferring the property to the HUD recipient, can the RE provide documentation of the following? Yes No Remediation Plan Ll Regulatory Oversight Agency Approval of the Remediation Plan Firm Cost Estimate to Implement the Remediation Plan ❑ ❑ A Secured Source of Funding for Site Remediation EJ El A project condition that the project construction or rehabilitation cannot proceed until the RE received a No Further Action (NFA) ❑ ❑ Required or Site Closure Letter from the Regulatory Oversight Agency A project condition for Deed Restrictions related to any continuing obligations associated with the remediation plan or ❑ ❑ t I NFA or Site Closure Letters If Yes, then, compliance is complete. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review. Ensure that all mitigation measures are identified in the environmental review and that there is a mechanism for conveying requirements in agreements and awards. Mark Box B on the Statutory Checklist for this Authority. Attach all supporting documentation. If No, HUD cannot provide assistance for the project at this site. j. If the site requires remediation, and the property owner intends to complete the remediation prior to transferring the property to the HUD recipient, can the RE provide documentation of the following? If Yes, then, compliance is complete. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review. Ensure that all mitigation measures are identified in the environmental review and that there is a mechanism for conveying requirements in agreements and awards. Mark Box B on the Statutory Checklist for this Authority. Attach all supporting documentation. 45 Yes No Remediation Plan Regulatory Oversight Agency Approval of the Remediation Plan Purchase contract and closing document requirements for receipt of a No Further Action Required or Site Closure Letter from the Regulatory Oversight Agency rior to closing. ❑ ❑ Deed restrictions for any continuing obligations associated with the remediation plan or NFA or Site Closure Letters ❑ El If Yes, then, compliance is complete. Attach supporting documentation to the environmental review. Ensure that all mitigation measures are identified in the environmental review and that there is a mechanism for conveying requirements in agreements and awards. Mark Box B on the Statutory Checklist for this Authority. Attach all supporting documentation. 45 If No, HUD cannot provide assistance for the project at this site. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Maps showing project distance to contaminated sites. Phase I (ASTM) Report. All ESAs and mitigation plans performed for this project.) For additional information see: HUD Site Contamination Webinar: https://www.onecpd info/leaming-center/environmental-review-training/#Evaluating Site Contamination HUD Guidance on Site Contamination: hns://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/site-contamination/ NEPAssist: http://neoassisttool.et)a.¢ov/ngpassist/entry asox EPA Envirofacts Data: htty://www.et)a.gov/enviro/ EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI): hq://www.et)a.aov/enviro/htmi/toxic releases.html EPA Maps: http://www.eva.goy/emefdata/em4ef.home EPA CERCLIS/NPL — Superfund database: http://www.et)agov/sMerftmd/siteVAuervibasic.htm ATSDR "ToxFAQs" summaries about hazardous substances: hM://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfags/index.asp Right -To -Know Network: htty://www.rtknet.ora/ 14. §58.5(j) Environmental Justice (E.O. 12898) a Is the project located in or designed to serve a predominantly minority and low- income neighborhood? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mmk box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. b. Would there be an adverse environmental impact caused by the proposed action, or would the proposed action be subject to an existing adverse environmental impact? ❑ Yes ❑ No If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If Yes, perform an Environmental Justice (EJ) analysis using census, geographic and other data to determine if a low-income/minority population is disproportionately impacted. Continue. M, C. Will the adverse environmental impact of the proposed action disproportionately impact minority and low-income populations relative to the community -at -large? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, Mitigation or avoidance of adverse impacts must be considered to the extent practicable; and, public participation processes must involve the affected population(s) in the decision-making process. Continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Document the determination of no disproportionate impacts. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. d. Has the mitigation plan been approved by the RE and the impacted community? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. Include mitigation plan in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, Project cannot move forward until EJ issue is mitigated to the satisfactory of the RE and impacted community. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Mapping of low-income and minority populations in the vicinity of the project site. EJ analysis. Mitigation Plan.) For additional information see: EJ HUD Guidance: https://www.onecnd info/environmental-review/environmental-justice/ HUD EJ Webmar: https://www.onecpd.info/leaniing-center/environmental-review-training/4EnJuomnental Justice at HUD EJ maps & analysis, by location: http://www.scorecard.org/community/ei-index.tel EPA's "EJ View" Tool provides information relevant to EJ assessments: htti)://et)amayI4.et)a.gov/eimai)/entrv.html Census data and maps also avail -able at httr)://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nay/isf/mes/index.xhtml Tract -level data on race & income: http://www.ffiec.gov/seocode 15. Summary of Mitigation Measures: (Required for Incorporation into Project Design, included in Public Notices, and included as requirements of contracts, grants, loans, etc. Ensure final measures are included in Project Description Section of 7015.15.) 47 16. References: (List the Federal, State, or local agencies contacted to obtain their existing environmental reports and other data used for the environmental review of the proposed project.) 17. List of Major Reports Obtained: (Attach report(s), such as wetlands delineation studies, biological evaluations or habitat assessments, Phase I and II environmental site assessments.) 18. List of Preparers and Summary of Qualifications: Elizabeth Alvarado, CDBG Coordinator 48