Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CM-2014-495 - 8/29/2014
City of Round Rock �aauxokax. rau ..�wa., Agenda Item Summary Agenda Number: Title: Consider executing the Compliance Checklist, Categorical Exclusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a) (3) (i), and the Statutory Worksheet for the Round Rock Housing Authority Capital Fund Grant 2014 for rehabilitation and renovation improvements at 1205 & 1207 Ridgemont Drive. Type: City Manager Item Governing Body: City Manager Approval Agenda Date: 8/29/2014 Dept Director: Cheryl Delaney, Finance Director Cost: Indexes: Attachments: COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST RIDGEMONT AUG.pdf, cat ex ridgemont aug.pdf, laf ridgemont.pdf, STAT CHECKLIST RIDGEMONT Al Department: Finance Department Text of Legislative File CM -2914-495 In order to achieve HUD's goal of providing a safe, suitable living environment, an Environmental Review Record (ERR) is required to be conducted for every project that is funded with federal funtls. The City Manager is the Certifying Officer for any projects funded with federal funds that are located within the City limits of the Responsible Entity (Round Rock) regardless of the agency receiving funds. The Round Rock Housing Authority has received a Capital Improvement Fund Grant from HUD to rehabilitate and renovate one of their duplexes located at 1205 8 1207 Ridgemont Drive. The Environmental Review Record (ERR) is a written record of the environmental review undertaken for each project and shall be available for public review and must contain all of the recommended formats. The ERR must contain all of the environmental review findings pertaining to the decision making and actions related to the individual project. The Round Rock Housing Authority Capital Improvements Grant 2014 Rehabilitation and Renovation project required the following level of ERR to be conducted and executed by the Certifying Officer: Categorical Exclusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a) (3) (i), Compliance Checklist and a Statutory Worksheet. Staff recommends approval. eiry of Rou dRock Pagel Panted on L3N1010 LEGAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FOR CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER ACTION Required for Submission of ALL Clty Council and City Manager Items RRFIA copped Fund Giant Catagodcel Exclusion Department Name: Finance Project Name: for 120G12or Ridpemonl Project Mgr/Resource: Liz Alvarado ConbactonVeneor. NIA Council Action: ORDINANCE RESOLUTION City Manager Approval CMA Wording Consider executing Categorical Exclusion for Round Rack Housing Authority Capital Fund Grant 2014 for renovations at 120 and 1207 Rklgemonl. orney Approval Attorney Date OAwdoASCClnt0112\1400\MUNICIPAL\00310015.XLS Updated 6/3/08 'ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PVRFOSE.PASSION.PRMPEn CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TX 78664 Compliance Checklist for 24 CFR §58.6, Other Requirements Complete for all projects, including Exempt (§58.34), Categorically Excluded Subject to §58.5 [§58.35(a)], Categorically Excluded Not Subject to §58.5[§58.35(6)], and Projects Requiring Environmental Assessments (§58.36). Must be completed for each individual property address included within the project description. Project Name: Round Rock Housing Authority Ridgemont ERR FILE # 1. §58.6(a) and (b) Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended; National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 a. Does the project involve: Formula grants made to states, State-owned property, small loans ($5,000 or less), assisted leasing that is not used for repairs, improvements, or acquisition? ❑ Yes ®No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. If No, continue. b. Is the project located in a FEMA identified Special Flood Hazard Area? ❑ Yes ® No If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, continue. C. Is the community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (or has less than one year passed since FEMA notification of Special Flood Hazards)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, Flood Insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program must be obtained. If HUD assistance is provided as a grant, insurance must be maintained for the economic life of the project and in the amount of the total project cost (or up to the maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). If HUD assistance is provided as a loan, insurance must be maintained for the term of the loan and in the amount of the loan (or up to maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). A copy of the flood insurance policy declaration must be kept on file in the ERR. If No, Federal assistance may not be used in the Special Flood Hazards Area. Cite and attach source documentation: (Documentation should include a FEMA Flood Map showing project location in reference to flood zone designation. If flood map is not available, use best available information.) For additional information we: HUD Guidance on Flood Insurance: https9/www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/flood-insurance/ FEMA Map Service Center: htto://www.msc.fema.gov NEW Community Status Book: www.feina.wov/fema/esb.shtm 49 (.-M- aoA-L+a5 2. §58.6(c) Coastal Barrier Improvement Act, as amended by the Coastal Barriers Improvement Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3501) a. Does the project involve new construction, conversion of land uses, major rehabilitation of existing structure, or acquisition of undeveloped land? ❑ Yes ® No If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, continue below. b. Is the project located in a coastal barrier resource area? ❑ Yes ❑ No If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, Federal assistance may not be used in such an area. Cite and attach source documentation: (Documentation should include map (e.g. Google Earth) noting project distance from Coastal Barrier Resources.) For more information see: CBRS I4UD Guidance: https://www.onmpd.into/environmental-review/coastal-barrier-resources/ CBRA mapper: htto://wim.usgs.gov/cbramapper/ebramapper.htmi 3. §58.6(d) Runway Clear Zones and Clear Zones [24 CFR §51.303(a) (3)1 a. Does the project involve the sale or purchase of existing property? Yes ❑No® If No, compliance with this section is complete. If yes, continue below. b. Is the project located within 2,500 feet of the end of a civil airport runway (Civil Airport's Runway Clear Zone) or within 15,000 feet of the end of a military runway (Military Airfield's Clear Zone)? Yes ❑ No ❑ If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, Notice must be provided to buyer. The notice must advise the buyer that the property is in a Runway Clear Zone or Clear Zone, what the implications of such a location are, and that there is a possibility that the property may, at a later date, be acquired by the airport operator. The buyer must sign a statement acknowledging receipt of this information, and a copy of the signed notice must be maintained in this ERR. Cite and attach source document (Map indicating project site in proximity to end of runway): For more information see: Airport Information: http://www.aimay.com/airports/ HUD Airport Hazards Guidance: https://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/airport-hazards/ Notice to Prospective Buyers: https://www onecpd.inf(,/icsource/2758/notice-prospective-buvers- propert ies-in-runwaN-clear-zones/ Date Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) Title (printed) 50 w..nb. um FIRM FIL04MRIMNC[MTERIP N'lIlLINYOV COLMY. M1wpl9FIVFnTIDnvn\ '. RIi�MV1M Z lAL \ CITY OF ROUN -"� 081048 �''. ..NAB i FPNB�N,B ROUND ROCK HOUSING AUTHOITY REHAB AND RENOVATION PROJECT CAPITAL FUND GRANT 2014 I 1205 & 1207 RIDGEMONT DRIVE FEMA MAP #48491C0635E 09/26/08 Williamson County Round Rock Texas Texas Coastal Management Program ' 1W _ —!L \ \/ L Y 1 Momtp *RY.Y t -2 5 Co ve�TAet GOO wH1� ,•. AirNav: Airport Search Results Page 1 of 2 .. j� AIRROSS � Ny AirNav Airport Search Results 23 airports found near Round Rock, TX ID CITY AIRPORT NAME WHERE EDC AUSTIN, TX AUSTIN EXECUTIVE AIRPORT 8.7 nm SE GTE GEORGETOWN, TX GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 10.0 nm N T74 TAYLOR, TX TAYLOR MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 12.3 nm ENE RYW LAGO VISTA, TX LAGO VISTA TX - RUSTY ALLEN 15.5 am W AIRPORT AUS AUSTIN, TX AUSTIN-BERGSTROM INTERNATIONAL 19,1 am S AIRPORT 3R9 LAKEWAY, TX LAKEWAY AIRPARK AIRPORT 19.2 am WSW 88R SPICEWOOD, TX SPICEWOOD AIRPORT 23.4 am W ® BMQ BURNET, TX BURNET MUNICIPAL KATE CRADDOCK 32.3 am WNW FIELD AIRPORT ® GRK TORT HOOD/KILLEEN, ROBERT GRAY AAF AIRPORT 34.3 mNNW ® ILE KILLEEN, TX SKYLARK FIELD AIRPORT 34.4 am N ® DZB HORSESHOE BAY, TX HORSESHOE BAY RESORT AIRPORT 35.6 nm W ® RCK ROCKDALE, TX H H COFFIELD REGIONAL AIRPORT 35.9 am ENE HLR HOOD(KILLEEN), HOOD AAF AIRPORT 37.7 am N LM XRT HYI SAN MARCOS, TX SAN MARCOS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 38.5 nm SSW 2KL SUNRISE BEACH SUNRISE BEACH AIRPORT 38.5 mW VILLAGE, TX ® 84R SMITHVILLE, TX SMITHVILLE CRAWFORD MUNICIPAL 39.0 nm SE AIRPORT ® 50R LOCKHART, TX LOCKHART MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 39.7 um S ® TPL TEMPLE, TX DRAUGHON-MILLER CENTRAL TEXAS 40.7 nm NNE REGIONAL AIRPORT ® GYB GIDDINGS, TX GIDDINGS-LEE COUNTY AIRPORT 41.2 am ESE T35 CAMERON, TX CAMERON MUNICIPAL AIRPARK 42.2 nm ENE AIRPORT Rua LZZ LAMPASAS, TX LAMPASAS AIRPORT 44.8 am NW https://W W W.aimay.com/cgi-bin/airport-search 8/20/2014 AirNav: Airport Search Results 0 T91 LULING, TX ©RWV CALDWELL, TX Copyright O AtrNav, LLC All nghts Muncd THE CARTER MEMORIAL AIRPORT CALDWELL MUNICIPAL AIRPORT https://W Ww.aimay.com/cgi-bin/airport-search Page 2 of 2 47.0 nm S 49.9 nm E [II x- Pollee (omxet 8/20/2014 CITY OF ROUND ROCK R Ru E ROCK. TE x ry 221 EAST MAIN STREET '2 eaosaear. ROUND ROCK, TX 78664 Categorical Exclusion Subiect to 558.5 Determination for Activities Listed at 24 CFR 558.35(aa) Grant Recipient: Round Rock Housing Authority Project Name: Rehab & Renovation Riditemom Project Description (Include all actions which are either geographically or functionally related): Foundation Repair Funding Source: CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA EDI Capital Food Operating Subsidy Hope VI Other Estimated Funding Amount: $48.067.00 Grant Number: CFP TX59P32250114 I have reviewed and determined that the above mentioned project is a Categorically Excluded activity (subject to §58.5) per 24 CFR §58.35(a) as follows: 15 58.35(a) (1). Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements (other than buildings) when the facilities and improvements are in place and will be ❑ retained in the same use without change in sin or capacity of more than 20 percent (e.g., replacement of water or sewer lines, reconstruction of curbs and sidewalks, repaving of streets); 5835(a) (2). Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the ❑ mobility of and accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons; 58.35(a) (3). Rehabilitation of buildings and improvements when the following conditions are met: 5835(a) (3) (i.)In the case of a building for residential use (with one to four units), the density is not ® increased beyond four units, the land use is not changed, and the footprint of the building is not increased in a floodplain or in a wetland; 58.35(a) (3) (ii). In the case of multifamily residential buildings: (A) Unit density is not changed more than 20 percent; (B) The project does not involve changes in land use from residential to non-residential; ❑ and (C) The estimated cost of rehabilitation is less than 75 percent of the total estimated cost of replacement after rehabilitation. 58.35(a) (3) (iii). In the case of non-residential structures, including commercial, industrial, and public buildings: El The facilities and improvements are in place and will not be changed in sin or capacity by more than 20 20 percent; AND (B) The activity does not involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to industrial, or from one industrial use to another. 58.35(a) (4) (i) An individual action on up to four dwelling units where there is a maximum of four units ❑ on any one site. The units can be four one -unit buildings or one four -unit building or any combination in between; or 15 The responsible entity must also complete and attach a §58.5 Statutory Checklist and Worksheet and a §58.6 Compliance Checklist. By signing below the Responsible Entity officially determines in writing that all activities covered by this determination are Categorically Excluded (subject to §58.5) and meets the conditions specified for such exclusion under section 24 CFR §58.35(a). This document must be maintained in the ERR. AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Steve Norwood City Manager Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) Title (printed) 16 58.35(a )( (ii) An individual action on a project of five or more housing units developed on scattered sites when the sites are more than 2,000 feet apart and there are not more than four housing units on any one ❑ site. 58.35(a) (iii) Paragraphs (a) (4) (i) and (ii) of this section do not apply to rehabilitation of a building for residential use (with one to four units) (see paragraph (a) (3) (i) of this section). 58.35(a) (5). Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, or equity loans on an existing structure, or ❑ acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided that the structure or land acquired, financed, or disposed of will be retained for the same use. 58.35(a) (6). Combinations of the above activities. The responsible entity must also complete and attach a §58.5 Statutory Checklist and Worksheet and a §58.6 Compliance Checklist. By signing below the Responsible Entity officially determines in writing that all activities covered by this determination are Categorically Excluded (subject to §58.5) and meets the conditions specified for such exclusion under section 24 CFR §58.35(a). This document must be maintained in the ERR. AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Steve Norwood City Manager Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) Title (printed) 16 'ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PAPPOSE fl1S510N. P0.05PE0.1TY. CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TX 78664 Statutory Checklist for Compliance with 24 CFR §58.5 - NEPA Related Federal Laws and Authorities (Must be completed for each individual addressed included under overall project description) Use this worksheet for projects that are Categorically Excluded Subject to 24 CFR §58.5 listed at 24 CFR §58.35(a) and for projects that require an Environmental Assessment. Project Name: RRFIA Rehab and Renovation 2014 ERR FILE 4 Definitions: A: The project is in compliance. B: The project requires an additional compliance step or action. Statute, Authority, Executive Order A B COMPLIANCE FINDING SOURCE DOCUMENTATION Cited at 24 CFR §58.5 1. 58.5(a) Historic Properties [36 X Project will not affect historic Clearance letter from SHPO CFR 800 ro erties. attached. 2. 58.5(b)(1) Floodplain X This project is not located Management [24 CFR 55, Executive within the 100 year Order 11988 floodplain, FEMA map attached. 3. 58.5(b)(2) Welland Protection X This project is not located in 24 CFR 55, Executive Order 11990 or near wetlands. Wetlands maps attached. 4. 58.5(c) Coastal Zone X Management [Coastal Zone Management Act sections 307(c) & This project is not located d within a coastal zone. Map of Texas Coast attached. 5. 58.5(d) Sole Source Aquifers X Project is in Williamson [40 CFR 1491 Project is not located within county which does not contain an EOA designated sole a sole source aquifer. source aquifer. Documentation attached. 6. 58.5(c) Endangered Species [50 X No critical habitat located in The project is likely to have CFR 402] or near this project site. `No Effect^ on federally protected species and critical habitat. Informal consultation with USFW and NMFS is not necessary. See memo from CDBG staff. 7. 58.5(f) Wild and Scenic Rivers X Project is located more than Map and additional [36 CFR 2971 400 miles form a designated information from the wild and scenic river. National Wild and Scenic River System attached. 8. 58.5(g) Air Quality [40 CFR X Project is located in See list of non -attainment parts 6, 51,61, 931 Williamson County, which is counties attached. out a Non Attainment Area. 9. 58.5(h) Farmland Protection [7 X Project is located in an area See zoning map attached. CFR 6581 zoned for urban use. 11 10. 58.5(iXI) Noise Control and Project is not located within Map attached. Abatement [24 CFR 5In] 3000 feet of a railroad or 1000 feet da major hi wa. 19 11. 58.5 (i) (1) Explosive and X As per Environmental See email from Laura Myers Flammable Operations 124 CFR 51C] officer, Laura Myers, the attached. nature of the project will not include rehab or renovation that will result in an increase in the number of people or converting the use of a building or making a vacant building habitable therefore this issue will not need to be addressed. 12. 58.5(1)(1) Airport Hazards X Project is not within 2,500 See maps of airports and (Runway Clear Zones and Clear feet of a civilian airport or military airfields attached as Zones/Accident Potential Zones) [24 runway clear zone. Project is well as information on CFR 51 D] not within 15, 000 feet of a airports in distance from military airfield, clear zone or project site. accident tential zone. 13. 58.5(i)(2)(i-iv) Contamination X There are no known and TOSubstances [24 CFR contaminations or toxic risks 58.5 i 2 near this site. 14. 58.5Q) Environmental Justice X There will be no adverse [Executive Order 12898] environmental impact caused by this project.. ® Box "A" has been checked for all authorities. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a) [Does not apply to EA or EIS level of review which can never convert to Exempt], the project can convert to Exempt, per §58.34(a) (12), since the project does not require any compliance measures (e.g., consultation, mitigation, permit or approval) with respect to any law or authority cited at §58.5. The project is now made Exempt and funds maybe drawn down; OR ❑ Box "B" has been checked for one or more authority. For Categorically Excluded actions pursuant to §58.35(a), the project cannot convert to Exempt since one or more authority requires compliance, including but not limited to consultation with or approval from an oversight agency, performance of a study or analysis, completion of remediation or mitigation measure, or obtaining of license or permit. Complete pertinent compliance requirement(s), publish NOI/RROF, request release of funds (HUD -7105.15), and obtain HUD's Authority to Use Grant Funds (HUD -7015.16) per §58.70 and §58.71 before committing funds; OR ❑ This project is not a Categorically Excluded action pursuant to §58.35(a), or may result in a significant environmental impact to the environment, and requires preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). Prepare the EA according to 24 CFR Part 58 Subpart E. MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL: (If Box B is checked, provide details regarding further consultation, mitigation, permit requirements or approvals required to be incorporated into public notices and project requirements such as contracts, grants, loan conditions, etc. as described in the Statutory Worksheet). Ensure required measures are included in 7015.15 Project Description Section. PTO PREP R: 20 Preparer's S' ature Date El/zabe><h 1ltfc<-ach Cx/g6 (?z)rwdika1b1e_ Preparer's Name (printed) Title (printed) AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Authorized Resp si VSignature Date n Steve Norwood Citv Manager Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) Title (printed) 21 ROUND ROCK. TEXAS b%f N14bNYIW}1'111NY. June 21, 2014 Mr. Chanes Peveto, SHPO Texas Historical Commission P.O. Box 12276 Austin, TX 78711-2276 Dear Mr. Peveto: In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470f), and its implementing regulation, 36 CFR 800, "Protection of Historic Properties ", we are initiating consultation with your office regarding the Round Rock Housing Authority Capital Chant Fund 2014 Rehabilitation and Restoration project in Round Rock at the following addresses: 1205 & 1207 Rideemont Round Rock. TX (this location is a duplex) Scope of work: Foundation repair. Based on our initial research, we have made the required determinations and findings, which we now ask you to review. Please respond in writing to us within twenty days. If you concur with the findings in this submission, please sign and date on the line below and return as noted above. If you do not concur, we request that you express your concerns and objections clearly in writing—so that HUD may continue the consultation process as needed. Please also indicate in your non- concurrence letter if there are other sources of information that should be checked, and if there are other parties, tribes, or members of the public you believe should be included in the consultation process. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, e6" � 4 ail"� Elizabeth G. Alvarado Community Development Coordinator CONCURRENCE: State Historic Preservation Officer/ Date Attachments: Texas Historical Commission Request for SHPO Consultation Maps (Fema, City of Round Rock Map) Williamson County Tax Appraisal District property ID List of Properties with Historic Overlay in Round Rock Scope of Work and Addresses Round Rock Housing Authority Request for ER letter Pictures SONEAEwm O1" �r ESNHS P w �prn w-Iwaiwm P1N6 06fY FIRM fL0001MNIMWY MIl YAP WNLI.TMBON GtllflY. IYGJ A�TINNWNATFD�IYV MW.1161P GWw•lrm rm .r rRi .rn�n SONE AE ra rivwir ROUND ROCK HOUSING AUTHO ITY REHAB AND RENOVATION PROJECT CAPITAL FUND GRANT 2014 1205 & 1207 RIDGEMONT DRIVE FEMA MAP #48491C0635E 09/26/08 !� ! ��� ■�■■ m � _I. f { / a __ ' § _ ., � c o , );; It U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory Y ori � MOM S'� �1 >> `��f� - feel ., � ■■■ ■��■ � \ / �\� � \ /• \; \ � � » ° • e a� ...� .. .. . . ~ ■ �� ` . &� Q- 2 Williamson County Round Rock Texa� CHICOTAQUIFER SYSTEM ILA 22101 ST. MARY CHICOTAQUIFER SYSTEM LA 2113 VERMILION CHICOTAQUIFER SYSTEM LA 2115 VERNON CHICOTAQUIFER SYSTEM LA 2125 WEST FELICIANA EDWARDS AQUIFER I RECHARGE ZONE TX 48029 BEXAR EDWARDS AQUIFER I RECHARGE ZONE TX 48091 COMAL EDWARDS AQUIFER I RECHARGE ZONE TX 48137 EDWARDS EDWARDS AQUIFER I RECHARGE ZONE TX 46209 HAYS EDWARDS AQUIFER I RECHARGE ZONE TX 48259 KENDALL EDWARDS AQUIFER I RECHARGE ZONE TX 48271 KINNEY EDWARDS AQUIFER I RECHARGE ZONE TX 48325 MEDINA EDWARDS AQUIFER I RECHARGE ZONE TX 48385 REAL EDWARDS AQUIFER I RECHARGE ZONE TX 48463 UVALDE EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX a8019 BANDERA EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX a8029 BEXAR EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX a8031 BLANCO EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 48091 COMAL EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 48137 EDWARDS EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 48171 GILLESPIE EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 46209 HAYS EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 46259 KENDALL EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 46265 KERR EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 48271 KINNEY EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 46325 MEDINA EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 46385 REAL EDWARDS AQUIFER I STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 48463 UVALDE EDWARDS AQUIFER II ARTESIAN ZONE TX 48209 HAYS EDWARDS AQUIFER II ARTESIAN ZONE TX 48453 TRAVIS EDWARDS AQUIFER II RECHARGE ZONE TX 48209 HAYS EDWARDS AQUIFER II RECHARGE ZONE TX 48453 TRAVIS EDWARDS AQUIFER II STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 48031 BLANCO EDWARDS AQUIFER II STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 48209 HAYS EDWARDS AQUIFER II STREAMFLOW SOURCE AREA TX 48453 TRAVIS ESPANOLA BASIN AQUIFER SYSTEM NM 35028 LOS ALAMOS ESPANOIA BASIN AQUIFER SYSTEM NM 5033 MORA ESPANOLA BASIN AQUIFER SYSTEM NM 35039 RIO ARRIBA ESPANOIA BASIN AQUIFER SYSTEM NM 5043 SANDOVAL ESPANOLA BASIN AQUIFER SYSTEM NM 5049 SANTA FE ESPANOLA BASIN AQUIFER SYSTEM NM 5055 TAOS SOUTHERN HILLS AQUIFER SYSTEM LA 2005 ASCENSION JrR=UD ROCK, TEXAS THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK PASSION PROSPERITY MEMORANDUM TO: RRHA Capital Fund Grant ERR File FROM: Elizabeth Alvarado, CDBG Coordinator DATE: August 8, 2014 SUBJECT: Rehab at 1205 & 1207 Ridgemont—"No Effect" on Endangered Species The RRHA Capital Fund Grant for rehabilitation at 1205 & 1207 Ridgemont includes foundation repair of an existing duplex in a residential area. The nature of the project will result in little to no environmental change to an existing structure that has been in existence for 30 years. I reviewed the USFWS and NMFS Endangered Species Act -Species Search and Critical Habitat websites for Williamson County. One known occurrence of the Jollyville plateau salamander habitat was recorded 2.2 miles from the proposed site but no other sites have been recorded within 1.5 miles of this project site. Based on the nature of the project and information reviewed from the USFWS and NMFS websites, it is my opinion that the nature of the project will likely have "no effect" on federally protected species and critical habitat. Critical Habitat Mapper 1205 8.1207 Ridgemont ..�. , s,• 'r 5 PI a 0 s c a.wvo. f tl v...a F .w at F i , i g�yypp J m O CagtlgM 2008 E5G. All noel ouseved. PpOe4 on M1bn Aug 252014 OP. 1706 PM J ' n i � 3 � � f i I I 1 I � � m cl, 7 y � r - sexal �ooa punoa -o •, 11-` , r �, ,, C � ' -^ 'yam c Nattanal Park Servire, U.S, Department of the Interlar Big Bend National Park How Far Is It? The Big Bend region is vast and isolated. Highway travel between destinations usually takes several hours and available services can be limited. Mileage from Big Bend National Park Headquarters at Panther Junction to: Abilene - 392 miles Alnarillo - 481 miles Beaumont - 697 miles Brownsville - 634 miles Carlsbad Caverns NP, New Memco - 305 miles Dallas - 559 miles Et Paso - 329 miles Fort Stockton -127 miles Galveston - 657 miles Houston - 610 miles Langtry - 211 miles Lyndon 13..Tehnson National Historical Pak - Lubbock - 358 miles Marfa -126 miles Midland - 242 miles; Odessa - 222 miles Padre lalaLid Nail, Seashore - 543 miles Presidio - 92 miles San Antonio - 406 miles Study Butte - 24 miles Alpine -100 miles Austin - 474 miles Big Spring - 281 miles Brownwood - 398 miles Corpus Christi - 526 miles Del Rio - 253 miles Fort Davis - 128 miles Fort Worth - 529 miles Guadalupe Mementos NP - 275 miles Lajitas - 41 miles Laredo - 434 mules 410 miles Marathon - 69 miles McAllen- 577 miles Monahan - 178 miles Ojinaga, Mexico - 93 utiles Pecos - 191 miles San Angelo - 300 miles Sanderson- 123 miles Terlingua - 28 miles Page I of 2 1111GA011 ro N 0 q N 0 w m n 0 W' N 0 b N 0 o m n 0 W N 0 m N 0 m n ro o. m H ° m N 0 ro N 0 m o m N 0 m N 0 a m W N 0 O 0 W N 0 o n N 0 N 0 s n 0 N 0 N 0 m N O [o b V N O W w b V N O W b V N O W b V N O ro b V N O W k b V N O O b V N O N N b V y k 2 O N ss S O N 2 O N ss 2 O N O W N O N N R1 N o O W N O W N O 01 N O W N O N T O O N 2 N ss 0 O N 2 O N ss 2 o N n m N > m v' i] m N > m v' n? n o N > m iu n m N > m m o 3 ri o m o X n -. o0 �' ,.� o ,.� m 0 o 0 m o -. �' X a Z wo w D o ? m Ll m > m w' G1 N m > m v' Ll qL m N > m X x Ll m N > m x X N m w m N 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston- Galveston- Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston- Galveston- Brazoria, TXy�'�t Harris Cc 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston- Galveston- Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 200E Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Johnson Cc 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Kaufman Cc 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Liberty Cc 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston- Galveston- Brazoria, TX -. (Marginal) Montgomery Cc 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston- Galveston- Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston- Galveston- Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Parker Cc 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Rockwall Cc 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Tarrant Cc 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Waller Cc 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston- Galveston- Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston- Galveston- Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) f 116 tub \ 166 2 . N6 PUD 9fi UAW PUD 61 PUD '60 U=ned PUD 23 (' PUD 59 PUD 90 PUD 83 PUD 84 PUD fi4 .PYA ', lVoned i l PUD 65 PUD 86 117 122 PUD 23 \ n z • ), noetl 'SPL PUD 71 -'.n� \ . UninnBC / wP.UD 73 UnzonU etl � p. No 1 o- , mxrwosa�n 'SPL - •\` PUD 83 PUD2 ' ( PUD 49 79 mxwso \• iPUD 29 sloe PUD]5 — UnzoneE ill ror.�r ru rsn , ,X �. PUD 44 PUD 66{ -- �•�`� 53:PUD PUD 14 PU043 1 PUD 1„. PUD]6— UD]4 gi PUD 95 \' ) PUD 10 PUD 2fi PUD''4 n .noueu� P,UD 6 PUD 94 PUO 11 mow""" PUD 35 PUD 79 PUD 92III- PUD 32 PUD 47 Unzaned w ""' PUD82 em PUD.18 'PUD 30 'SPL PUD 4] Ur�z _d S1 m"r° PUD 25 PUD 69 '' IKKI'' Unzoned 1� PUD 45 PUD 27 PUD 5n' PUPUD D13 p58 ®.., • PU062 2 �_.. � PUD 56 \\ Unzonetl y PUD 20T PUD 31 PUD]2 PUD 15 C 1 PUD 38 I ` 172 � Q R; r. 3,690 Ft Igloo= oa a a00000ai do o d: a000aaoAcog v o0 2,980 Ft N we 1205 Ridgemont St s I000n 1 inch = 600 feet Elizabeth- Alvarado From: Myers, Laura L <Laum,L.Myers@hud.gov> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 11:51 AM To: Elizabeth Alvarado Cc: Britton, Barbara R Subject: RE: housing authority project Liz, For the level of upgrades you are doing (replacing appliances and some HVAC units, painting, and fencing) y u wllP I not I need to do a noise level calculation. I would strongly encourage you, an opportunity arises to do an energy audit, aspeclallyfort osethatare nearest the railway, to consider assessing the noise issue. It is very easy to accommodate noise attenuation when upgrading energy efficiency inthe home. R/ LM From: Myers, Laura L Sent: Thursday, November 17, 201110:43 AM To: 'Elizabeth Alvarado' Cc: Britton, Barbara R Subject: RE: housing authority project Liz, you will still need to address noise in the environmental review process. 15 there an airport within 15 miles of the site.? Is there a major roadway within 7.000 feet of the site? Is there a railway within 3000 feet of the site? if the answers to all of these questions are "nu" then you have done all you need to address noise. If any of the answers are yes, then a noise analysis would need to be done to calculate the DNL of the site. If the site D N L is less than 65dB, then you have done all you need to address noise. I -or major or substantial rehab projects, if the DNL is 65-75 dB HUD encoul'ages noise atterivation to be Included in renovations commensurate with the level of renovation planned. If the UNI- is above 75 dB, HUD strongly encourages conversion of the noise -exposed site to a land use more compatible with high levels of noise. Please see Part 51.101(a 5. As for addressing explosives and flammable operations, the regulations apply to any HUD -assisted projectbe defined in 24 CFR 51.201. The Interpretation of"rehabilitation"and"modernization" in that definition as described in the ASD Guidebook, refer only to such repairs and renovation of the flti1) assisted project that will result In an Increase In the number of people, of converting the use of a buildingto hurnan habitation, m' making a vacant building habitable. Ifthe above described type of renovation is planned for your project, then you will need to address this issue, which would begin with a site visit and visual survey of an area one mile in radius surrounding' the site for any above ground storage tanks. If It does nut involve the above described type of renovation, then you will only need to state that In your ERR. Let me Imow if I have answered your questions or if you need anything further From: Elizabeth Alvarado (mailto:lalvarado@round-rock.tx.us] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20114:02 PM To: Myers, Laura L subject: FW: housing authority project Laura, Since this project is more renovating and minor rehab how should I answer on explosives and flammables and toxic chemicals and noise abatement? Should I consult someone from the city on this as documentation. Thanks for all your help. '. Liz 341-3328 From: Elizabeth Alvarado sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20113:12 PM To: 'Myers, Laura L' Subject: RE; housing authority project Yes they are hud funds but not cdbg. Thank you From: Myers, Laura L [mailto:Laura.L.Myers@hud.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20113:11 PM To: Elizabeth Alvarado Subject: RE: housing authority project I agree, although it only applies if HUD funds are being used R/ Um From: Elizabeth Alvarado [mallto:lalvarado@round-rock.tx.us] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20111:54 PM To: Myers, Laura L Subject: housing authority project Hi laura, Any time the Round Rock Housing Authority needs an environmental done even if it's not a project being funded with CDBG funds, I have to do the review. so the Housing Authority is asking me to do a review for the following project at the administrative office and the housing units at the housing authority main location being paid with CFP funds: Interior Renovations to include painting Replace existing ranges with new ones Replace administrative equipment Replace existing HVAC systems with new ones per unit as needed I determined that the forms that I need to use are the following: Compliance Documentation Checklist Categorically Excluded Subject to 58.5 per 24 CFR 58.35 (a) 3 if Statutory Checklist (and it converts to exempt?) 2111/0014 15951 Ln,RoeM Rod{ TX78864t0wt Had-aaa9I.Mgn Google Directions to Fort Hood g 53.9 mi— about 1 hour 6 mins M"Nma 9aa91ecoWmps7f=dsaurce=s_d&saddr=195+feace+t.a +Rand+Rack+TX&dsddrFat+Hand+y4931.1M1,-97741314&4=en 9�... 15 National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (2013.2017 B-55