Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CM-13-12-232
City of Round Rock Agenda Item Summary Agenda Number: Title: Consider executing the Categorical Exlcusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a) (3) (1), Statutory Workshee, Compliance Checklist and an Environmental Review Worksheet for the CDBG 2012-2013 & 2013-2014 Veterans Park Improvements Project. Type: City Manager Item Governing Body: City Manager Approval Agenda Date: 2/28/2014 Dept Director: Cheryl Delaney Cost: Indexes: Attachments: Signed LAF -Veteran's Park Enviromental Review (00293554xA08F8).pdf, environ assessment veterans.pdf, compliance checklist veterans.pdf, stat checklist veterans.pdf, environment review record summary veterans.pdf, categorically excluded sub to 58.5 veterans.pdf Department: Finance Department Text of Legislative File CM -13-12-232 HUD requires that every CDBG project file contain a written record of the environmental reivew undertaken for each project which is termed the Environmental Review Record (ERR). The ERR shall be available for public review and must contain all of the recommended formats. The ERR must contain all of the environmental review documents, public notices, written determination and any environmental review findings pertaining to the decision making and actions related to individual project. The CDBG Veterans Park Improvements project required that a Categorical Exclusion Subject to 58.5 Determination 24 CFR 58.35 (a)(1), Statutory Worksheet and an Environmental Review be conducted and executed by the Certifying Officer. Staff recommends approval. City of Round Rock Page 1 Printed on 2/27/2014 LEGAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FOR CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER ACTION Required for Submission of ALL City Council and City Manager Items Department Name: Finance Project Mgr/Resource: Liz Alvarado Council Action: ORDINANCE Agenda Wording Project Name: Veteran's Park Environmental Review ContractorNendor: N/A RESOLUTION E]City Manager Approval CMA Wording Consider executing Environmental Review for Veteran's Park improvement project. Attorney Approval 1:jo‘ttorney Notes/Comments Dater -,9)2,1/1 O:\wdox\SCCInts\0179\1400\MUNICIPAL\00293476.XLS Updated 6/3/08 ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY. CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TEXAS 78664 Environmental Review Record Summary Sheet Project Number HUD Program: CDBG Program Year: 2012 (IDIS): Project Name: Veterans Park Improvements Project Location (street, city, county/State, & zip code): 600 Pecan Ave. Number of Dwelling Units N/A Project site is in a location described as ❑ Central city ® Suburban ® New Construction ® Rehabilitation ❑ Urban development n Undeveloped area Project Description (Attach additional descriptive information, as appropriate to the project, including narrative, maps, photographs, site plans, budgets and other information.)1: Improvements to include replacement of park restroom, installation of trash receptacles, picnic tables and benches, bike racks, installation of new park pavilion, replacement of sidewalks, basketball court to include construction of a steel open air structure with a roof that is approximately 60'x100' with 20' clearance and minor improvements to the basketball court and amenities. The subject project has been reviewed pursuant to HUD regulations 24 CFR Part 58, "Environmental Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities, " and the following determination with respect to the project is made: ❑ Exempt from NEPA review requirements per 24 CFR §58.34(a) ( ) (Compliance Checklist for §58.6 is attached.) ❑ Categorically Excluded NOT Subject to §58.5 authorities per 24 CFR §58.35(b) (_) (Compliance Checklist for §58.6 is attached.) ✓ Categorically Excluded SUBJECT to §58.5 authorities per 24 CFR §58.35(a) (1) (Compliance Checklist for §58.6, and Statutory Worksheet and Checklist for the §58.5 authorities are attached.) ✓ An Environmental Assessment (EA) is required to be performed. (An Environmental Assessment Worksheet and Checklist performed in accordance with subpart E of 24 CFR Part 58, Compliance Checklist for §58.6, and Statutory Worksheet and Checklist for the §58.5 authorities are attached.) ❑ An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required to be performed. 1 Source documentation consists of verifiable source documents and/or relevant base data. Appropriate documentation must be provided for each authority and resource analyzed. Documents may be incorporated by reference into the ERR provided that each source document is identified and available for inspection by interested parties. Proprietary material and studies that are not otherwise generally available for public review shall be included in the ERR. 5 Cry-�3_-1a-a3a ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY. CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TEXAS 786664 Categorical Exclusion Subject to §58.5 Determination for Activities Listed at 24 CFR §58.35(a) Grant Recipient: City of Round Rock Project Name: Veterans Park Improvements Project Description (Include all actions which are either geographically or functionally related): Improvements to include replacement of park restroom, installation of trash receptacles, picnic tables and benches, bike racks, installation of new park pavilion, replacement of sidewalks, basketball court to include construction of a steel open air structure with a roof that is approximately 60'x100' with 20' clearance and minor improvements to the basketball court and amenities. Location: 600 Pecan Ave Funding Source: CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA EDI Capital Fund Operating Subsidy Hope VI Other Estimated Funding Amount: $317,549 Grant Number: B 12MC480514, B13MC480514 I have reviewed and determined that the above mentioned project is a Categorically Excluded activity (subject to §58.5) per 24 CFR §58.35(a) as follows: 13 58.35(a) (1). Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements (other than buildings) when the facilities and improvements are in place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent (e.g., replacement of water or sewer lines, reconstruction of curbs and sidewalks, repaving of streets); ❑ 58.35(a) (2). Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of and accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons; 58.35(a) (3). Rehabilitation of buildings and improvements when the following conditions are met: ❑ 58.35(a) (3) (i.)In the case of a building for residential use (with one to four units), the density is not increased beyond four units, the land use is not changed, and the footprint of the building is not increased in a floodplain or in a wetland; ❑ 58.35(a) (3) (ii). In the case of multifamily residential buildings: (A) Unit density is not changed more than 20 percent; (B) The project does not involve changes in land use from residential to non-residential; and (C) The estimated cost of rehabilitation is less than 75 percent of the total estimated cost of replacement after rehabilitation. ❑ 58.35(a) (3) (iii). In the case of non-residential structures, including commercial, industrial, and public buildings: (A) The facilities and improvements are in place and will not be changed in size or capacity by more than 20 percent; AND (B) The activity does not involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to industrial, or from one industrial use to another. ❑ 58.35(a) (4) (i) An individual action on up to four dwelling units where there is a maximum of four units on any one site. The units can be four one -unit buildings or one four -unit building or any combination in between; or 13 The responsible entity must also complete and attach a §58.5 Statutory Worksheet and a §58.6 Compliance Checklist. By signing below the Responsible Entity officially determines in writing that all activities covered by this determination are Categorically Excluded (subject to §58.5) and meets the conditions specified for such exclusion under section 24 CFR §58.35(a). This document must be maintained in the ERR. AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Authorized Responsible Entity Signature Date Leve, R orwoccA Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) 14 %/y C. 'it Title (printe 1\Aa"a") 58.35(a )( (ii) An individual action on a project of five or more housing units developed on scattered sites when the sites are more than 2,000 feet apart and there are not more than four housing units on any one site. ❑ 58.35(a) (iii) Paragraphs (a) (4) (i) and (ii) of this section do not apply to rehabilitation of a building for residential use (with one to four units) (see paragraph (a) (3) (i) of this section). 58.35(a) (5). Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, or equity loans on an existing structure, or ❑ acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided that the structure or land acquired, fmanced, or disposed of will be retained for the same use. ❑ 58.35(a) (6). Combinations of the above activities. The responsible entity must also complete and attach a §58.5 Statutory Worksheet and a §58.6 Compliance Checklist. By signing below the Responsible Entity officially determines in writing that all activities covered by this determination are Categorically Excluded (subject to §58.5) and meets the conditions specified for such exclusion under section 24 CFR §58.35(a). This document must be maintained in the ERR. AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Authorized Responsible Entity Signature Date Leve, R orwoccA Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) 14 %/y C. 'it Title (printe 1\Aa"a") -"RROUND ROCK, TEXAS PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TEXAS 786664 Environmental Assessment Project Name: Veterans Park Improvements ERR File #: Veterans Park CDBG 2012 & CDBG 2013 Project Location (give address and map coordinates): 600 Pecan Ave. RE Contact Name and Phone Number: Steve Norwood 512-218-5400 Recipient Name and Phone Number: City of Round Rock 512-218-5400 Estimated Total Project Cost (all sources): $317,549 Amount of HUD Assistance: $317,549 HUD Grant Program: CDBG Description of the Project: Include all contemplated actions that are logically either geographically or functionally a composite part of the project, regardless of the source of funding. [24 CFR 58.32, 40 CFR 1508.25] As appropriate, attach maps, site plans, renderings, photographs, budgets and other descriptive information. Funds will be used for the park restrooms, replacement of sidewalk, installation of picnic tables and benches, trash receptacles, and a park pavilion, improvements at the Park basketball court to include construction of a steel open-air structure with a roof that is approximately 60'x100' with 20' clearance to provide shade for the basketball court and minor improvements to the basketball court and basketball amenities. Purpose of the Project: ["Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal" - 40 CFR 1508.9(b)] This project is needed because this park is used heavily. The much needed replacement of the existing facilities will bring this park up to current ADA standards and provide residents with a safe and fun environment in which to play and recreate. The existing park amenities are deteriorated due to factors such as age and material composition. Additionally these park improvements will bring the park up to current Round Rock standards for community parks. Existing Conditions and Trends: Describe the existing conditions of the project area and its surroundings, and the trends likely to continue in the absence of the project. [24 CFR 58.40(a)] 49 CM-L3—Io? -a3a The project site is an existing park, approximately 2.5 acres in size. The park currently has a parking lot, playscape, basketball court, restroom facilities, sidewalk access, open space and park amenities such as benches and picnic tables. The existing conditions at this site include numerous large shade trees, and scenic views of Brushy Creek. FINDING: [58.40(g)] ® Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) (The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment.) ❑ Finding of Significant Impact (The project may significantly affect the quality of the human environment.) Preparer's Signature ----` Date: 01/29/2014 Preparer's Name and Title: Elizabeth Alvarado, CDBG Coordinator Preparer's Agency (If different from RE Authorized RE fficial ignature: Date: ,Z Z, 7, Authorized RE Official Name and Title: Steve Norwood, City Manager Conditions for Approval: (List all mitigation and project modification measures adopted by the responsible entity to eliminate or minimize adverse environmental impacts. These conditions must be included in project contracts and other relevant documents as requirements.) [24 CFR 58.40(d), 40 CFR 1505.2(c)] 8 -Step process attached. Compliance with 24 CFR §58.5, Related Federal Laws and Authorities Instructions: Incorporate Statutory Worksheet, Statutory Checklist and source documentation here. Attach all documentation to EA. Compliance 24 CFR §58.6, Other Requirements Instructions: Incorporate Compliance Checklist and source documentation here. Attach all documentation to EA. 50 Environmental Assessment Checklist Instructions: Summarize the findings from the EA Worksheet here by choosing the appropriate determination from the drop-down box in the determination column for each resource (Drop down menu summaries are included in Table 1 below). Then, cite the source document in the appropriate column. Resource Determination Source Documentation Land Development 1. Conformance with Comprehensive Plans and Zoning In Conformance Land is zoned for parks and recreational facilities. 2. Land Use Compatibility and Urban Impact Compatible This project site is currently a developed park so land use is compatible. 3. Slope and Erosion Not Applicable (State Why) Site inspection showed only slight slopes. 4. Soil Suitability No Evidence of Soil Issues Site inspection did not show any evidence of soil issues. 5. Hazards and Nuisances and Site Safety No Impact Site visit did not reveal any natural hazards such as Faults, fracture , Cliffs, bluffs, crevices, Slope -failures from rains or Unprotected water bodies or Fire hazard materials Wind/sand storm concerns Poisonous plants, insects, animals Hazardous terrain features 6. Energy Consumption Not Applicable (State Why) Not applicable. This project will not require additional energy. Socioeconomic Factors 7. Demographic Character Changes Not Applicable (State Why) No impact. This project is rehab of existing facility and not change the demographic. 8. Displacement No Displacement Nature of this project will not cause displacement 9. Employment and Income Patterns No Impact Nature of project will not have any impact on employment or income patterns Community Facilities and Service 10. Educational Facilities Not Applicable (State Why) Nature of this project will not impact any educational facilities or the need for additional educational facilities. 51 Resource Determination Source Documentation 11. Commercial Facilities Not Applicable (State Why) Nature of this project will not require additional commercial facilities. This project is only rehabbing the existing park that will serve the same amount of people currently using the park. 12. Health Care Not Applicable (State Why) Nature of this project will not require additional health care. This project is only rehabbing the existing park that will serve the same amount of people currently using the park. 13. Social Services Not Applicable (State Why) Nature of this project will not require additional social services. This project is only rehabbing the existing park that will serve the same amount of people currently using the park. 14. Solid Waste Existing/Planned Facilities are Adequate Nature of this project will not create additional solid waste. This project is only rehabbing the existing park that will serve the same amount of people currently using the park 15. Waste Water Existing/Planned Facilities are Adequate Nature of this project will not create additional waste water or impact the water treatment plan. This project is only rehabbing the existing park that will serve the same amount of people currently using the park 16. Storm Water Existing/Planned Facilities are Adequate Existing park has a permanent area of trees and shrubs located adjacent to a creek. Riparian areas are the most beneficial type of buffer for they provide ecological and water quality benefits 17. Water Supply Existing/Planned Facilities are Adequate Nature of project will not impact the water supply. This is a rehab of an existing park and will not require additional water. 18. Public Safety •Police Existing/Planned Services are Adequate Nature of project will not require the need for additional police or public safety. This is a rehab of an existing park and will continue to serve the same amount of people. • Fire Existing/Planned Services are Adequate Nature of project will not require additional fire protection. This is a rehab of an existing park and will serve the same amount of people therefore not requiring additional fire and safety services. • Emergency Medical Existing/Planned Services are Adequate Nature of project will not require additional medical facilities or ambulance services. 19. Open Space and Recreation • Open Space Not Applicable (State Why) This is a project to rehab an open space and recreational facility. • Recreation Not Applicable (State Why) This project will create a better environment for people to enjoy recreation. • Cultural Facilities Existing/Planned Facilities are Adequate Nature of this project will not require the need for additional cultural facilities 52 Resource Determination Source Documentation 20. Transportation Existing/Planned Facilities are Adequate Nature of this project will not create the need for additional transportation Natural Features 21. Water Resources No Impact Nature of this project will not impact our water resources 22. Unique Natural Features and Agricultural Lands No Impact to or from Unique Natural Features Nature of this project will have no impact on unique natural features and agricultural lands. Project is rehab of an existing park and in a developed suburban area. 23. Vegetation and Wildlife No Impact Nature of project will have no impact on vegetation and wildlife. 53 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Land Development 1. Conformance with Comprehensive Plans and Zoning: a. Is project in conformance with existing zoning or consistent with community's general development plans? ® Yes ❑No b. Will a special permit or change in zoning be required? Will the project need to be modified to conform to zoning requirements (e.g. reduce the density or height)? n Yes N No Comments: this is an existing park Cite and attach source of documentation (e.g. Zoning Map): zoning map attached 2. Land Use Compatibility and Urban Impact: a. Will the project be compatible with surrounding land uses? ® Yes ❑ No b. Will there be a change in land use? ❑ Yes ® No c. Will the project contribute to urban sprawl? ❑ Yes ® No Comments: this is an existing park. Rehab is compatible with land use Cite and attach source documentation: zoning map attached 3. Slope and Erosion a. Slopes: ❑ Not Applicable; ❑ Steep; ❑ Moderate; ® Slight. b. If moderate to steep slope, does the design plan include measures to overcome potential erosion, slope stability and runoff problems? ❑ Yes ® No c. Is there evidence of slope erosion or unstable slope conditions on or near the site? n Yes ® No d. Is there evidence of ground subsidence, high water table or other unusual conditions on the site? ❑ Yes ® No e. Will the project significantly affect or be affected by the slope conditions? n Yes ® No Comments: site visit determined a slight slope. Park is in a floodzone. 54 Cite and attach source documentation: flood zone map attached. pictures attached. 4. Soil Suitability a. Is there any visible evidence of soil problems (foundations cracking or settling, basement flooding, etc.) in the neighborhood of the site? ❑ Yes ® No b. Have soil studies or borings been made for the project site or the area? I-1 Yes ® No c. Do the soil studies or borings indicate marginal or unsatisfactory soil conditions? N/A ❑ Yes ® No d. Is there indication of cross -lot runoff, swales, or drainage flows on the property? 7Yes ®No e. Are there visual indications of filled ground? n Yes ® No f. Are there active rills and gullies on site? n Yes ® No g. If the site is not to be served by a municipal waste water disposal system, has a report of the soil conditions suitable for on-site septic systems been submitted? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A h. Is a soils report (other than structural) needed? ❑ Yes PI No i. Are structural borings or a dynamic soil analysis/geological study needed? ® Yes ❑ No Comments: Geotech soil borings were conducted. Cite and attach source documentation: 5. Hazards, Nuisances and Site Safety: a. Will the Faults, fracture Cliffs, bluffs, crevices Slope -failures from rains Unprotected water bodies project be affected by natural hazards? Yes El No El Fire hazard materials Wind/sand storm concerns Poisonous plants, insects, animals Hazardous terrain features 55 Yes No b. Will the project be Hazardous street Dangerous intersection Through traffic Inadequate separation of pedestrian/vehicle traffic Children's play areas located next to freeway or other high traffic way Inadequate street lighting Quarries or other excavations Dumps/sanitary landfills or mining Railroad crossing affected by built hazards and nuisances? Yes No 0 El c. Will the project be Yes Gas, smoke, fumes 0 Odors 0 Vibration Glare from parking area Vacant/boarded-up buildings d. O 0 0 Inadequate screened drainage catchments Hazards in vacant lots Chemical tank -car terminals Other hazardous chemical storage High-pressure gas or liquid petroleum transmission lines on site Overhead transmission lines Hazardous cargo transportation routes Oil or gas wells Industrial operations affected by nuisances? No ® Unsightly land uses ® Front -lawn parking Abandoned vehicle ® Vermin infestation ® Industrial nuisances Other (specify) Are there other unusual conditions on the site? ❑ Yes ®No Yes No O El O El ❑ Yes No O Z O Z e. Has the site been used as a dump, sanitary landfill or mine waste disposal area? ❑ Yes ® No f. Is there indication of: Yes No Distressed Vegetation Waste material/containers Soil staining, pools of liquid Loose/empty drums, barrels oil/chemical spills abandoned machinery, cars, refrigerators, etc transformers, fill/vent pipes, pipelines, drainage structures 56 Yes No g. Is the project compatible with surrounding land uses in terms of: Yes No ® ❑ Building type (low/high-rise) Z ❑ Building Density Land Use Height, bulk, mass h. Will the project be unduly influenced by: Yes No ❑ ® Transition of land uses ❑❑ ® Incompatible land uses Inadequate off-street parking Building deterioration Postponed maintenance Obsolete public facilities i. Are there Heavy Industry Incinerators Power generating plants Cement plants Comments: site inspections Cite and attach source documentation: site inspection 6. Energy Consumption: Yes No Z El ® ❑ Yes No O El air pollution generators nearby which would adversely affect the site? Yes No El Z Large parking facilities (1000 or more cars) Heavy travelled highway (6 or more lanes) Oil refineries Other Yes No O El O El a. Has the project design taken full advantage of potential energy saving measures such as insulation, solar panels, window design and placement, lighting, heating, cooling and hot water systems? ❑ Yes ® No N/A b. Are they in conformance with HUD Minimum Property Standards and other applicable energy saving codes? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A c. Is the project location in close proximity to transit, shopping, services and employment locations? n Yes n No N/A Comments: This project is a rehab of an existing park and not applicable to these requirements. Only new construction in this project is the park pavilion. Cite and attach source documentation: THIS IS NOT NEW CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND Socioeconomic Factors 7. Demographic/Community Character Changes: a. Will the proposed project significantly alter the demographic characteristics of the community? n Yes ® No 57 b. Will the proposed project severely alter residential, commercial or industrial uses? ❑ Yes ® No c. Will the proposed project destroy or harm any community institution, such as a neighborhood church? ❑ Yes ®No Comments: This is project is a rehab of an existing park and not applicable to these requirements. Cite and attach source documentation: 8. Displacement: a. Will the project directly displace individuals or families? fl Yes No b. Will the project destroy or relocate existing jobs, community facilities or any business establishment? n Yes ® No c. Is the displacement covered by the Uniform Relocation Act and are funds available for payment? LI Yes No Comments: This project is not new construction and not appicable Cite and attach source documentation: 9. Employment and Income Patterns: a. Will changes occur in employment and income patterns as a result from the project? ❑ Yes N No b. Will the project either significantly increase or decrease employment opportunities? fl Yes No c. Will it create conditions favorable or unfavorable to commercial, industrial, or institutional operation or development? n Yes N No Comments: this project is not new construction and not appicable Cite and attach source documentation: 58 Community Facilities and Services 10. Educational Facilities: a. Will the additional school age children in the proposed development exceed the capacity of existing or planned school facilities? ❑ Yes N No b. Do the potentially affected schools have adequate safe access facilities given the projected population increase? n Yes ® No c. Will additional or alternative facilities need to be provided to ensure safe suitable access? ❑ Yes N No Comments: Not applicable for the nature of this project. Cite and attach source documentation: 11. Commercial Facilities: a. Is there adequate and convenient access to retail services? Do local retail services meet the need of project occupants/users? n Yes N No b. Will existing retail and commercial services be adversely impacted by the proposed project? ❑ Yes ®No Comments: Not applicable to the nature of this project. Cite and attach source documentation: 12. Health Care: a. Is emergency health service available within approximately three to five minutes? J Yes ❑No b. Are non -emergency health care services located within a reasonable proximity to the proposed project? ® Yes ❑ No c. Is the number of doctors, dentists, nurses and other trained medical staff in realistic proportion to any increase in residents/users? Yes n No Comments: Not applicable due to nature of project Cite and attach source documentation: 59 13. Social Services: a. Are social services currently located in close proximity to the prospective users/residents? ® Yes ❑ No b. Is the number of trained staff including social workers, counselors, psychologists, psychiatrist and related administrative and managerial personnel in realistic proportion to the anticipated increase in residents/users? ® Yes n No Comments: Not applicable due to nature of this project Cite and attach source documentation: 14. Solid Waste: a. Will the existing or planned solid waste disposal system adequately service the proposed development? ® Yes n No b. Will project overload the design capacity of these facilities? ❑ Yes 1 No c. Trash collection and solid waste disposal ® Municipal n Private Comments: Not applicable to nature of this project. Cite and attach source documentation: 15. Waste Water a. Will the existing or planned waste water systems adequately service the proposed development? ® Yes ❑ No b. Will project overload the design capacity of these facilities? n Yes N No c. Will the proposed project be adversely affected by proximity to these facilities? ❑ Yes ® No d. Sanitary sewers and waste water disposal systems 1 Municipal n Private Comments: Not applicable to the nature of this project Cite and attach source documentation: 60 16. Storm Water: a. Will existing or planned storm water disposal and treatment systems adequately service the proposed development? J Yes ❑ No b. Will project overload the design capacity of these facilities? ❑ Yes N No Comments: large trees and vegetation at the park will capture any runoff. Cite and attach source documentation: 17. Water Supply: a. Will either the municipal water utility or on-site water supply system be adequate to serve the proposed project? • Yes No b. Is the water supply quality safe from a chemical and bacteriological standpoint? ® Yes ❑ No c. If the water supply is non -municipal, has an acceptable "system" been approved by appropriate authorities? n Yes ❑ No N/A d. If the sanitary sewers and waste water disposal systems are non -municipal, has an acceptable "system" been approved by appropriate authorities and agencies? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A Comments: not applicable due to nature of this project Cite and attach source documentation: 18. Public Safety: a. Does the project location provide adequate access to police, fire and emergency medical services? 171 Yes n No b. Is the average response time for police, fire and emergency medical services in the area of the project sufficient to meet the needs of the project? N Yes n No c. Does the area have a particularly high crime rate? fl Yes No d. Is the quality of the police, fire protection and emergency medical services available to the project adequate to meet project needs? ® Yes ❑ No Comments: not applicable due to nature of this project 61 Cite and attach source documentation: 19. Open Space, Recreational and Cultural Facilities: a. Are open spaces, recreational and cultural facilities within reasonable proximity to the project area? N Yes No b. Is adequate public transportation available from the project to these facilities? N Yes ❑ No c. Will the project cause any overloading of these facilities? ❑ Yes ®No Comments: Project is rehab of a park Cite and attach source documentation: 20. Transportation: a. Will transportation facilities and services be adequate to meet the needs of the project's users? ❑ Yes n Non /a b. Is adequate parking available for the project? Will the project overload existing or proposed transportation services? ❑ Yes ®No c. Will the project create a situation whereby facilities are seriously under used? n Yes N No Comments: Not applicable to this project Cite and attach source documentation: Natural Features 21. Water Resources: a. Will the project use groundwater for its water supply? f Yes NNo b. Are there large numbers of wells or wells that pump large quantities of water from the water table near the proposed project site? f Yes N No c. Are there visual or other indications of water quality problems on or near the site? [l Yes ® No d. Will the project involve discharge of sewage effluent into surface water bodies? ❑ Yes N No 62 Comments: not applicable due to nature of project Cite and attach source documentation: 22. Unique Natural Features and Agricultural Land: a. Is the site near natural features (i.e., bluffs or cliffs) or near public or private scenic areas? ❑ Yes ®No b. Are other natural resources visible on site or in vicinity? Will any such resources be adversely affected or will they adversely affect the project? ❑ Yes N No c. Will the unique natural feature pose safety hazards for a proposed development? 7Yes ®No Comments: site visit to verify conditions Cite and attach source documentation: 23. Vegetation and Wildlife: a. Will the project damage or destroy trees without replacement? ❑ Yes L No b. Will the project create an environmental condition that might threaten the survival of existing vegetation, particularly changes in the native plant community habitats? n Yes ® No c. Will the project create conditions favorable to nuisance species? ❑ Yes N No Comments: not applicable due to nature of project Cite and attach source documentation: 63 Summary of Findings and Conclusions Project Alternatives Considered [24 CFR 58.40(e), Ref. 40 CFR 1508.9] (As appropriate, identify other reasonable courses of action that were considered and not selected, such as other sites, design modifications, or other uses of the subject site. Describe the benefits and adverse impacts to the human environment of each alternative and the reasons for rejecting it. Include consideration of the No Action Alternative, that is, not implementing the preferred alternative). No other alternatives. Project is a rehabilitation of an existing park and will have very limited impact to the environment. If no action was taken the park would continue to deteriorate and become less useful for community members. Mitigation and Project Modification Measures Recommended [24 CFR 58.40(d), 40 CFR 1508.20] (Recommend feasible ways in which the proposal or its external factors should be modified in order to minimize adverse environmental impacts and restore or enhance environmental quality.) Efforts will be made to decrease environmental impacts during construction and after construction is complete. During construction, silt fences will be put along the creek to limit impacts of erosion. The construction of the pavilion will include measures to get it out of the 100 year flood plain to limit damage and adverse impacts during floods. Additional Studies Performed (List the reports, studies or analyses performed for this assessment, and attach studies or summaries.) 8 -Step process List of Agencies and Persons Consulted [40 CFR 1508.9(b)] (List agencies and persons consulted for this assessment.) State historic preservation office Texas Commission on Environmental Quality US Environmental Protection Agency 64 ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PURPOSE. MSSION. PROSPERITY. CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TEXAS 78664 Compliance Checklist for 24 CFR §58.6, Other Requirements Complete for all projects, including Exempt 058.34), Categorically Excluded Subject to §58.5 [§58.35(a)1, Categorically Excluded Not Subject to §58.5[§58.35(b)], and Projects Requiring Environmental Assessments 058.36) Project Name: City of Round Rock Parks Department Veterans Park Improvements ERR FILE # Veterans Park 1. §58.6(a) and (b) Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended; National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 a. Does the project involve new construction, major rehabilitation, minor rehabilitation, improvements, acquisition, management, new loans, loan refinancing or mortgage insurance? ® Yes ❑ No If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, continue. b. Is the project located in a FEMA identified Special Flood Hazard Area? ® Yes ❑ No project is located in AE. FEMA flood map #48491C0495E is attached. An 8 Step process was conducted. 8 -step process documentation attached. If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, continue. c. Is the community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (or has less than one year passed since FEMA notification of Special Flood Hazards)? • Yes I No If Yes, Flood Insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program must be obtained. If HUD assistance is provided as a grant, insurance must be maintained for the economic life of the project and in the amount of the total project cost (or up to the maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). If HUD assistance is provided as a loan, insurance must be maintained for the term of the loan and in the amount of the loan (or up to maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). A copy of the flood insurance policy declaration must be kept on file in the ERR. If No, Federal assistance may not be used in the Special Flood Hazards Area. Cite and attach source documentation: (Documentation should include a FEMA Flood Map showing project location in reference to flood zone designation. If flood map is not available, use best available information.) For additional information see: FEMA Map Service Center: http://www.store.msc.fema.gov NFIP Community Status Book: www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm 16 2. §58.6(c) Coastal Barrier Improvement Act, as amended by the Coastal Barriers Improvement Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3501) a. Does the project involve new construction, conversion of land uses, major rehabilitation of existing structure, or acquisition of undeveloped land? Yes ❑ No If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, continue below. b. Is the project located in a coastal barrier resource area? ❑ Yes ® No If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, Federal assistance may not be used in such an area. Cite and attach source documentation: (Documentation should include map (e.g. Google Earth) noting project distance from Coastal Barrier Resources.) For more information see: CBRS maps on US FWS and FEMA websites: http://www.FWS.gov/CBRA/ http://www.FWS.gov/CBRA/Maps/index.html 3. §58.6(d) Runway Clear Zones and Clear Zones [24 CFR §51.303(a) (3)] a. Does the project involve the sale or purchase of existing property? Yes ❑ No El If No, compliance with this section is complete. If yes, continue below. b. Is the project located within 2,500 feet of the end of a civil airport runway (Civil Airport's Runway Clear Zone) or within 15,000 feet of the end of a military runway (Military Airfield's Clear Zone)? Yes ❑ No xi If No, compliance with this section is complete. If Yes, Notice must be provided to buyer. The notice must advise the buyer that the property is in a Runway Clear Zone or Clear Zone, what the implications of such a location are, and that there is a possibility that the property may, at a later date, be acquired by the airport operator. The buyer must sign a statement acknowledging receipt of this information, and a copy of the signed notice must be maintained in this ERR. Cite and attach source document (Map indicating project site in proximity to end of runway): For more information see: Airport Information: http://www.airnay.com/airports/ HUD Airport Hazards Q&A: http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program offices/comm planning/environment/review/aa/airport A " /OFFICIAL: -/i10/07, 7,401.4,1PP Authorized Respon i P e Entity Signature i e. I \ar W dX Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) 17 o Date C'M-oyv\LLIeL Title (printed) s airmail*, et Ohs commonly. contact your rsurance Mwrarco Program at t-800-0100-8820. Oman Nroadt MIB 048SE FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE IMP WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS A. got.. u.. 'M* only.. mw or. OM oft •••..r .n..p. .....a........c. —w w a.- ...m. el... la ..m awe. n.. tt_ w4 c sw« ww.:. .nano.. #0t nrormvaa inrrrwe G.p..n .u..Ill •Mc. H. G(N. cum CDBG Program Year 2012-2013 Veterans Park Improvements 600 Pecan Avenue FEMA Map #48491C0495E Dated 09/26/2008 ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY City of Round Rock, TX City Park Project 8 -Step Process Step 1: Determine whether the action is located in a 100 -year floodplain (or a 500 -year floodplain for critical action). FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel # 48491CD495E, effective September 26, 2008, depicts the site as being inside the 100 -year floodplain zone (Zone AE), with portions of the site being inside the 500 -year floodplain (Zone X). FEMA defines Zone AE Floodway as the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the % annual chance of flood can be carried without substantial increase in flood heights. Zone X flood areas are determined to be areas of 0.2% annual chance of flood, areas of 1% annual chance of flood with average depths of 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. The project proposal called for the construction of a park pavilion within the flood plain. However, this structure will not impede the flow of water and will not increase the flood heights during the 100 -year flood. Step 2: Notify the public for early review of the proposal and involve the affected and interested public in the decision making process. There is a designated floodplain associated with this site at Veterans Park. An early floodplain notice was published in the Round Rock Leader on Saturday, August 24, 2013 regarding the construction of a park pavilion in the 100 -year floodplain of Brushy Creek and affording the opportunity for public input. No comments were received. Step 3: Identify and evaluate practicable alternatives. a. Proposed Alternative The proposed actions at Veterans Park include the renovation of the park restrooms to bring them up to ADA standards. This will also include updating plumbing fixtures, roof fascia, and restroom fixtures. The project will also replace the existing sidewalk and amenities along the path and playground (including picnic tables, benches, and trash receptacles). The plan also calls for the construction of a pavilion with a grilling area and additional picnic tables. Since the park is used heavily, the renovation planned at this park will bring the park up to current ADA standards and provide residents with a safe and fun environment in which to play and recreate. The construction of the pavilion and rehabilitation of the rest of the park features will not increase the amount of work to maintain the park significantly. Additionally, the construction of the pavilion will not negatively impact the flow of the 100 -year flood water or increase the environmental or public health and safety. b. No Action Alternative The park would not be renovated and the pavilion will not be built. The existing structures and amenities in the park would continue to deteriorate and be out of ADA compliance. Step 4: Identify Potential Direct and Indirect Impacts Associated with Floodplain Development. The parkland is already designated as open space. This project is compatible with long-term goals to keep floodplains as open space. The construction of the pavilion and renovation of the existing amenities will not impede the flow of water and will not negatively impact the floodplain. Step 5: Where practicable, design or modify the proposed action to minimize the potential adverse impacts to lives, property, and natural values within the floodplain and to restore, and preserve the values of the floodplain. a) Preserving Lives: In the event of flood conditions, the park will be closed. Since the park is only accessible by road or sidewalk, if water crosses onto the road, a barricade will be placed to alert potential users of the flood conditions. b) Preserving Property: There will be no enclosed structures built in the floodplain. The pavilion constructed will be an open air pavilion and will allow water to pass. The materials chosen to construct the pavilion will be chosen to limit any potential damage from a flood. c) Preserving Natural Values and Minimizing Impact: A minimal amount of fill will be used in the floodplain and the pavilion will be carefully situated and constructed so that there is little to no impact on the floodplain. During construction, measures will be taken to limit its impact on stream quality and stability. These practices include siltation fences, erosion mats, and vegetation to hold the soil. The site is already part of a maintenance rotation, so the grounds will be maintained to limit any negative environmental impacts from trash. By improving this park and extending its usable life, it is helping to ensure this land will remain zoned as open space. This will prohibit any future development on this site. Step 6: Reevaluate the alternatives Although the construction of the pavilion is in a floodplain, it will not create a significant impact on the 100 -year storm. Its construction, in addition to the rehabilitation of the existing structures, will ensure that the land remains zoned as open space in the future. Additionally, the existing park is heavily used and the rehabilitation is necessary to ensure a safe place for families to visit. The area is already maintained and the project will not exceed the ability to keep the area safe and clean. Alternatively, if the park is left as is, the conditions would continue to worsen and become an even less safe place for visitors. Step 7: Determination of No Practicable Alternative It is our determination that the rehabilitation of the existing features in Veterans Park and the construction of the pavilion is the best practicable alternative for the site. A final notice was published in the Round Rock Leader on Saturday, September 14, 2013 detailing the reasons why the project will not impact the floodplain, a list of alternates considered, and all mitigation measures taken to minimize adverse impacts and preserve natural and beneficial floodplain values. No concerns were expressed by the public concerning this notice. Step 8: Implement the Proposed Action The City of Round Rock Parks and Recreation Department will assure that this plan, as described above, is executed and necessary language will be included in all agreements with participating parties. PARD will also take an active role in monitoring the construction process to ensure no unnecessary impacts nor unnecessary risks are taken. Early Notice and Public Review of a Proposed Activity in a 100 -Year Floodplain & Wetlands To: All interested Agencies, Groups and Individuals This is to give notice the City of Round Rock has conducted an evaluation as required by Executive Order 11988 and 11990, in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR 55.20 Subpart C Procedures for Making Determinations on Floodplain Management, to determine the potential affect that its activity in the floodplain and wetland will have on the human environment for Veteran's Park Improvements under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) number B12MC480514 and future funding years. Purpose of this project is to rehabilitate Veterans park restroom to include replacement of roof, plumbing fixtures, and sidewalk, make ADA improvements, installation park tables, benches and trash receptacles, construction of a new park pavilion as well as additional future park improvements and new construction on site with future CDBG funding years. CDBG 2012-2013 and future CDBG funds will be used for to pay for the improvements at the 2.9 acre park that is inside the 100 year floodplain (Zone AE) with portions of the site being inside the 500 year floodplain (Zone X). A minimal amount of fill will be used in the floodplain and site improvements that will be carefully situated and constructed so that there is little to no impact on the floodplain. These practices include siltation fences, erosion mat and vegetation to hold the soil. The site is already part of maintenance rotation, so the grounds will be maintained to limit any negative environment impacts from trash. The proposed project(s) is located 600 Pecan Avenue in Round Rock, Texas, Williamson County. There are three primary purposes for this notice. First, people who may be affected by activities in floodplains and those who have an interest in the protection of the natural environment should be given an opportunity to express their concerns and provide information about these areas. Second, an adequate public notice program can be an important public educational tool. The dissemination of information about floodplains can facilitate and enhance Federal efforts to reduce the risks associated with the occupancy and modification of these special areas. Third, as a matter of fairness, when the Federal government determines it will participate in actions taking place in floodplains, it must inform those who may be put at greater or continued risk. Written comments must be received by the City of Round Rock at the following address on or before September 10, 2013 at 221 East Main Street, 512-341-3328. Attention: Steve Norwood, City Manager, during the hours of 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Comments may also be submitted via email at lalvarado@roundrocktexas.gov. Publication Date: Saturday, August 24, 2013 Final Notice and Public Explanation of a Proposed Activity in a 100-Year Floodplain To: All interested Agencies, Groups and Individuals This is to give notice that the City of Round Rock has conducted an evaluation as required by [Executive Order 11988 and/or 11990], in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR 55.20 Subpart C Procedures for Making Determinations on Floodplain Management, to determine the potential affect that its activity in the floodplain and wetland will have on the human environment for CDBG under B12MC480514. The proposed project(s) is located 600 Pecan Avenue in Round Rock, Williamson County. Purpose of this project is to rehabilitate Veterans park restroom to include replacement of roof, plumbing fixtures, and sidewalk, make ADA improvements, installation park tables, benches and trash receptacles, construction of a new park pavilion as well as additional future park improvements and new construction on site with future CDBG funding years. Park is on 2.9 acres that are inside the 100 year floodplain (Zone AE) with portions of the site being inside the 500 year floodplain (Zone X). The City of Round Rock has considered the following alternatives and mitigation measures to be taken to minimize adverse impacts and to restore and preserve natural and beneficial values: The City of Round Rock has reevaluated the alternatives to building in the floodplain and has determined that it has no practicable alternative. Environmental files that document compliance with steps 3 through 6 of [Executive Order 11988 and/or 11990], are available for public inspection, review and copying upon request at the times and location delineated in the last paragraph of this notice for receipt of comments. This activity will have no significant impact on the environment for the following reasons: Although the construction of the pavilion is in a floodplain, it will not create a significant impact on the 100-year storm. Its construction, in addition to the rehabilitation of the existing structures, will ensure that the land remains zoned as open space in the future. Additionally, the existing park is heavily used and the rehabilitation is necessary to ensure a safe place for families to visit. The area is already maintained and the project will not exceed the ability to keep the area safe and clean. The parkland is already designated as open space. This project is compatible with long-term goals to keep floodplains as open space. The construction of the pavilion and renovation of the existing amenities will not impede the flow of water and will not negatively impact the floodplain. There are three primary purposes for this notice. First, people who may be affected by activities in floodplains and those who have an interest in the protection of the natural environment should be given an opportunity to express their concerns and provide information about these areas. Second, an adequate public notice program can be an important public educational tool. The dissemination of information about floodplains can facilitate and enhance Federal efforts to reduce the risks associated with the occupancy and modification of these special areas. Third, as a matter of fairness, when the Federal government determines it will participate in actions taking place in floodplains, it must inform those who may be put at greater or continued risk. Written comments must be received by the City of Round Rock at the following address on or before September 23, 2013: Liz Alvarado, 221 East Main Street Round Rock, TX 78664 (512) 341-3328, Attention: Steve Norwood, City Manager, during the hours of 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Comments may also be submitted via email at lalvarado(aroudnrocktexas.gov. Publication Date: September 14, 2013 Texas Coastal Management Program ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY. CITY OF ROUND ROCK 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TEXAS 78664 Statutory Checklist for Compliance with 24 CFR §58.5 - NEPA Related Federal Laws and Authorities Use this worksheet for projects that are Categorically Excluded Subject to 24 CFR §58.5 listed at 24 CFR §58.35(a) and for projects that require an Environmental Assessment. Project Name: City of Round Rock Parks Department Veterans Park Project ERR FILE # Veterans Park Definitions: A: The project is in compliance. B: The project requires an additional compliance step or action. Statute, Authority, Executive Order Cited in cited at 24 CFR §58.5 A B COMPLIANCE FINDING SOURCE DOCUMENTATION 1. 58.5(a) Historic Properties [36 CFR 800] X Project will not affect historic properties. Letter from State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) Attached. 2. 58.5(b)(1) Floodplain Management [24 CFR 55, Executive Order 11988] X Project is located in 100 year floodplain. 8 -step decision making process completed and attached. 3. 58.35(b)(2) Wetland Protection [24 CFR 55, Executive Order 11990] X Project is adjacent to wetlands. 8 -step decision making process completed and attached. 4. 58.35(c) Coastal Zone Management [Coastal Zone Management Act sections 307(c) & (d)] X Project is not located within a coastal zone. Texas Coastal Management Program Map attached. 5. 58.35(d) Sole Source Aquifers [40 CFR 149] X Project is not located within an EPA designated sole source aquifer watershed. Letter from EPA attached. 6. 35(e) Endangered Species [50 CFR 402] X Project is likely to have "no effect" on protected species and critical habitat and the Service has not identified any endangered species in the project area. Critical Habitat Mapper page and memorandum attached. 7. 58.35(0 Wild and Scenic Rivers [36 CFR 297] X Project is located more than 400 miles from a designated Wild & Scenic River. Map and additional information from National Wild and Scenic River System attached. 8. 58.35(g) Air Quality [CFR parts 6, 51,93] X Project is located in Williamson County, which is not an Non -Attainment area. See list of non -attainment counties attached. 9. 58.35(h) Farmland Protection [7 CFR 658] X Project is located in an area zoned for urban use, specifically parks and See zoning map attached. 22 DETERMINATION: ❑ Box "A" has been checked for all authorities. If Categorically Excluded pursuant to §58.35(a), the project can convert to Exempt, per §58.34(a) (12), since the project does not require any compliance measure (e.g., consultation, mitigation, permit or approval) with respect to any law or authority cited at §58.5. The project is now made Exempt and funds may be drawn down; OR ® Box "B" has been checked for one or more authority. The project cannot convert to Exempt since one or more authority requires compliance, including but not limited to consultation with or approval from an oversight agency, performance of a study or analysis, completion of remediation or mitigation measure, or obtaining of license or permit. Complete pertinent compliance requirement(s), publish NOURROF, request release of funds (HUD -7105.15), and obtain HUD's Authority to Use Grant Funds (HUD -7015.16) per §58.70 and §58.71 before committing funds; OR ❑ This project may result in a significant environmental impact to the environment and requires preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). Prepare the EA according to 24 CFR Part 58 Subpart E. MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL: (If Box B is checked, provide details regarding further consultation, mitigation, permit requirements or approvals required to be incorporated into public notices and project requirements such as contracts, grants, loan conditions, etc as described in the Statutory Worksheet). 23 recreational uses. 10. 58.35(i)(1) Noise Control and Abatement [24 CFR 51B] X Project is in a public park and does not involve a noise sensitive use. See zoning map attached. 11. 58.35 (i) (1) Explosive and Flammable Operations [24 CFR 51C] X There are no known above ground storage tanks or facilities, containing liquid industrial fuels, hazardous liquids or gases, or explosive or fire -prone materials near the project. 12. 58.5(i)(1) Airport Hazards (Runway Clear Zones and Clear Zones/Accident Potential Zones) [24 CFR 51D] X Project is not within 2,500 feet of a civilian airport, or runway clear zone. Project is not within 15,000 of a military airfield, clear zone or accident potential zone. Map of civilian airports and military airfields attached. 13. 58.5(i)(2)(i) Contamination and Toxic Substances [24 CFR 58.5(i)(2)] X There are no known contamination or toxic risks near the site. 14. 58.5(j) Environmental Justice [Executive Order 12898] X There will be no adverse environmental impact caused by the project. Environmental justice map attached. DETERMINATION: ❑ Box "A" has been checked for all authorities. If Categorically Excluded pursuant to §58.35(a), the project can convert to Exempt, per §58.34(a) (12), since the project does not require any compliance measure (e.g., consultation, mitigation, permit or approval) with respect to any law or authority cited at §58.5. The project is now made Exempt and funds may be drawn down; OR ® Box "B" has been checked for one or more authority. The project cannot convert to Exempt since one or more authority requires compliance, including but not limited to consultation with or approval from an oversight agency, performance of a study or analysis, completion of remediation or mitigation measure, or obtaining of license or permit. Complete pertinent compliance requirement(s), publish NOURROF, request release of funds (HUD -7105.15), and obtain HUD's Authority to Use Grant Funds (HUD -7015.16) per §58.70 and §58.71 before committing funds; OR ❑ This project may result in a significant environmental impact to the environment and requires preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). Prepare the EA according to 24 CFR Part 58 Subpart E. MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL: (If Box B is checked, provide details regarding further consultation, mitigation, permit requirements or approvals required to be incorporated into public notices and project requirements such as contracts, grants, loan conditions, etc as described in the Statutory Worksheet). 23 610-a4AA ao a)0/1/ Date Elizabeth Alvarado CDBG Coordinator Preparer's Name (printed) AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OFFICIAL: Authorized Resp no sig a ntity Signature Steve Norwood Title (printed) Date ce-/z City Manager Authorized Responsible Entity Name (printed) Title (printed) v: n 2. 20 3 1 March 22, 2013 Mr. Bradford Jones Texas Historical Commission P.O. Box 12276 Austin, TX 78711-2276 Dear Mr. Jones: First let me apologize for not sending you a detailed description of the proposed project at 600 Pecan Avenue- Veterans Park. Veterans Park is an existing park with a restroom, small parking lot, tennis courts and a playground. We are proposing to do the following at the park: Replacement and installation of picnic benches and tables, trash receptacles and a bike rack. Replacement of restroom roof and plumbing fixtures. Replacement of existing sidewalk. Installation of new park pavilion (24x36). Please call me at 512.341.3328 or 512.801.0104 or email me at lalvarado@roundrocktexas.gov should you require additional information or have questions on the scope of work. Sincerely, ,at ic,/7 d,26 E izabet ► G. Alvarado Community Development Coordinator ANTIQUITIES CODE OF TEXAS REVIEW NO OJETMARROCED D PROJECT YPE for Mark Wolfe Executive Director, THC Date Y/ Track# by ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY. City of Round Rock, TX City Park Project 8 -Step Process Step 1: Determine whether the action is located in a 100 -year floodplain (or a 500 -year floodplain for critical action). FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel # 48491CD495E, effective September 26, 2008, depicts the site as being inside the 100 -year floodplain zone (Zone AE), with portions of the site being inside the 500 -year floodplain (Zone X). FEMA defines Zone AE Floodway as the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the % annual chance of flood can be carried without substantial increase in flood heights. Zone X flood areas are determined to be areas of 0.2% annual chance of flood, areas of 1% annual chance of flood with average depths of 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. The project proposal called for the construction of a park pavilion within the flood plain. However, this structure will not impede the flow of water and will not increase the flood heights during the 100 -year flood. Step 2: Notify the public for early review of the proposal and involve the affected and interested public in the decision making process. There is a designated floodplain associated with this site at Veterans Park. An early floodplain notice was published in the Round Rock Leader on Saturday, August 24, 2013 regarding the construction of a park pavilion in the 100 -year floodplain of Brushy Creek and affording the opportunity for public input. No comments were received. Step 3: Identify and evaluate practicable alternatives. a. Proposed Alternative The proposed actions at Veterans Park include the renovation of the park restrooms to bring them up to ADA standards. This will also include updating plumbing fixtures, roof fascia, and restroom fixtures. The project will also replace the existing sidewalk and amenities along the path and playground (including picnic tables, benches, and trash receptacles). The plan also calls for the construction of a pavilion with a grilling area and additional picnic tables. Since the park is used heavily, the renovation planned at this park will bring the park up to current ADA standards and provide residents with a safe and fun environment in which to play and recreate. The construction of the pavilion and rehabilitation of the rest of the park features will not increase the amount of work to maintain the park significantly. Additionally, the construction of the pavilion will not negatively impact the flow of the 100 -year flood water or increase the environmental or public health and safety. b. No Action Alternative The park would not be renovated and the pavilion will not be built. The existing structures and amenities in the park would continue to deteriorate and be out of ADA compliance. Step 4: Identify Potential Direct and Indirect Impacts Associated with Floodplain Development. The parkland is already designated as open space. This project is compatible with long-term goals to keep floodplains as open space. The construction of the pavilion and renovation of the existing amenities will not impede the flow of water and will not negatively impact the floodplain. Step 5: Where practicable, design or modify the proposed action to minimize the potential adverse impacts to lives, property, and natural values within the floodplain and to restore, and preserve the values of the floodplain. a) Preserving Lives: In the event of flood conditions, the park will be closed. Since the park is only accessible by road or sidewalk, if water crosses onto the road, a barricade will be placed to alert potential users of the flood conditions. b) Preserving Property: There will be no enclosed structures built in the floodplain. The pavilion constructed will be an open air pavilion and will allow water to pass. The materials chosen to construct the pavilion will be chosen to limit any potential damage from a flood. c) Preserving Natural Values and Minimizing Impact: A minimal amount of fill will be used in the floodplain and the pavilion will be carefully situated and constructed so that there is little to no impact on the floodplain. During construction, measures will be taken to limit its impact on stream quality and stability. These practices include siltation fences, erosion mats, and vegetation to hold the soil. The site is already part of a maintenance rotation, so the grounds will be maintained to limit any negative environmental impacts from trash. By improving this park and extending its usable life, it is helping to ensure this land will remain zoned as open space. This will prohibit any future development on this site. Step 6: Reevaluate the alternatives Although the construction of the pavilion is in a floodplain, it will not create a significant impact on the 100 -year storm. Its construction, in addition to the rehabilitation of the existing structures, will ensure that the land remains zoned as open space in the future. Additionally, the existing park is heavily used and the rehabilitation is necessary to ensure a safe place for families to visit. The area is already maintained and the project will not exceed the ability to keep the area safe and clean. Alternatively, if the park is left as is, the conditions would continue to worsen and become an even less safe place for visitors. Step 7: Determination of No Practicable Alternative It is our determination that the rehabilitation of the existing features in Veterans Park and the construction of the pavilion is the best practicable alternative for the site. A final notice was published in the Round Rock Leader on Saturday, September 14, 2013 detailing the reasons why the project will not impact the floodplain, a list of alternates considered, and all mitigation measures taken to minimize adverse impacts and preserve natural and beneficial floodplain values. No concerns were expressed by the public concerning this notice. Step 8: Implement the Proposed Action The City of Round Rock Parks and Recreation Department will assure that this plan, as described above, is executed and necessary language will be included in all agreements with participating parties. PARD will also take an active role in monitoring the construction process to ensure no unnecessary impacts nor unnecessary risks are taken. Early Notice and Public Review of a Proposed Activity in a 100 -Year Floodplain & Wetlands To: All interested Agencies, Groups and Individuals This is to give notice the City of Round Rock has conducted an evaluation as required by Executive Order 11988 and 11990, in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR 55.20 Subpart C Procedures for Making Determinations on Floodplain Management, to determine the potential affect that its activity in the floodplain and wetland will have on the human environment for Veteran's Park Improvements under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) number B 12MC480514 and future funding years. Purpose of this project is to rehabilitate Veterans park restroom to include replacement of roof, plumbing fixtures, and sidewalk, make ADA improvements, installation park tables, benches and trash receptacles, construction of a new park pavilion as well as additional future park improvements and new construction on site with future CDBG funding years. CDBG 2012-2013 and future CDBG funds will be used for to pay for the improvements at the 2.9 acre park that is inside the 100 year floodplain (Zone AE) with portions of the site being inside the 500 year floodplain (Zone X). A minimal amount of fill will be used in the floodplain and site improvements that will be carefully situated and constructed so that there is little to no impact on the floodplain. These practices include siltation fences, erosion mat and vegetation to hold the soil. The site is already part of maintenance rotation, so the grounds will be maintained to limit any negative environment impacts from trash. The proposed project(s) is located 600 Pecan Avenue in Round Rock, Texas, Williamson County. There are three primary purposes for this notice. First, people who may be affected by activities in floodplains and those who have an interest in the protection of the natural environment should be given an opportunity to express their concerns and provide information about these areas. Second, an adequate public notice program can be an important public educational tool. The dissemination of information about floodplains can facilitate and enhance Federal efforts to reduce the risks associated with the occupancy and modification of these special areas. Third, as a matter of fairness, when the Federal government determines it will participate in actions taking place in floodplains, it must inform those who may be put at greater or continued risk. Written comments must be received by the City of Round Rock at the following address on or before September 10, 2013 at 221 East Main Street, 512-341-3328. Attention: Steve Norwood, City Manager, during the hours of 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Comments may also be submitted via email at lalvarado@roundrocktexas.gov. Publication Date: Saturday, August 24, 2013 Final Notice and Public Explanation of a Proposed Activity in a 100-Year Floodplain To: All interested Agencies, Groups and Individuals This is to give notice that the City of Round Rock has conducted an evaluation as required by [Executive Order 11988 and/or 11990], in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR 55.20 Subpart C Procedures for Making Determinations on Floodplain Management, to determine the potential affect that its activity in the floodplain and wetland will have on the human environment for CDBG under B 12MC480514. The proposed project(s) is located 600 Pecan Avenue in Round Rock, Williamson County. Purpose of this project is to rehabilitate Veterans park restroom to include replacement of roof, plumbing fixtures, and sidewalk, make ADA improvements, installation park tables, benches and trash receptacles, construction of a new park pavilion as well as additional future park improvements and new construction on site with future CDBG funding years. Park is on 2.9 acres that are inside the 100 year floodplain (Zone AE) with portions of the site being inside the 500 year floodplain (Zone X). The City of Round Rock has considered the following alternatives and mitigation measures to be taken to minimize adverse impacts and to restore and preserve natural and beneficial values: The City of Round Rock has reevaluated the alternatives to building in the floodplain and has determined that it has no practicable alternative. Environmental files that document compliance with steps 3 through 6 of [Executive Order 11988 and/or 11990], are available for public inspection, review and copying upon request at the times and location delineated in the last paragraph of this notice for receipt of comments. This activity will have no significant impact on the environment for the following reasons: Although the construction of the pavilion is in a floodplain, it will not create a significant impact on the 100-year storm. Its construction, in addition to the rehabilitation of the existing structures, will ensure that the land remains zoned as open space in the future. Additionally, the existing park is heavily used and the rehabilitation is necessary to ensure a safe place for families to visit. The area is already maintained and the project will not exceed the ability to keep the area safe and clean. The parkland is already designated as open space. This project is compatible with long-term goals to keep floodplains as open space. The construction of the pavilion and renovation of the existing amenities will not impede the flow of water and will not negatively impact the floodplain. There are three primary purposes for this notice. First, people who may be affected by activities in floodplains and those who have an interest in the protection of the natural environment should be given an opportunity to express their concerns and provide information about these areas. Second, an adequate public notice program can be an important public educational tool. The dissemination of information about floodplains can facilitate and enhance Federal efforts to reduce the risks associated with the occupancy and modification of these special areas. Third, as a matter of fairness, when the Federal government determines it will participate in actions taking place in floodplains, it must inform those who may be put at greater or continued risk. Written comments must be received by the City of Round Rock at the following address on or before September 23, 2013: Liz Alvarado, 221 East Main Street Round Rock, TX 78664 (512) 341-3328, Attention: Steve Norwood, City Manager, during the hours of 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Comments may also be submitted via email at lalvaradoca,roudnrocktexas.gov. Publication Date: September 14, 2013 +� x Legend x FEMA FLOODPLAIN Floodway 1%Annual Chance(100yr) afi 1%Approx.(100yr) 0.2%Annual Chance(500yr) Veterans Park - Floodplain Location°Map .T3 j y{ ♦Y ■III IIYi.�,'y{�� �•w 7 N L " gL � Texas Coastal Management Program TEXAOGENTOOLLIMOOFFICE limas — COUNiY Jg'lO 0 JACKSON COUNTY l y i 1 i Project Site 600 Pecan Ave. Round Rock, Texas 78664 TmooT Om*, n - low 0=.1*T"° raor i,oa o" ATOM TT Two mOmer worn wu..•Mo.w..mm.*MWWI T.14000 ow — *.Monmima.,m M' MOM. MOM.. WP Cowed POomme Ion Ow. WO Moe 1 Wow MT 1100.0e0ow WY* Mom 11.0•1100.0:0 DLO imam. Tom m"s.rw..rr MOO MOO= X10.® Carnoilal Ow Nemo. doplanl tr.a..011.1101 i' A -6 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 4.��/f o REGION 6 s 1445 ROSS AVENUE, SUITE 1200 41- 4t aRo1- DALLAS, TX 75202-2733 February 25, 2013 Ms. Liz Alvarado CDBG Coordinator City of Round Rock 221 East Main Street Round Rock, TX 78664 Dear Ms. Alvarado: We have received your February 12, 2013, email requesting our evaluation of the potential environmental impacts which might result from the following project: Construct Pavilion & Upgrade Facilities Veterans Park, 600 Pecan Av. Williamson County Round Rock, Texas In administering the sole source aquifer (SSA) program under Section 1424 of the Safe Drinking Water Act our Office performs evaluations of projects with federal financial assistance which are located over a designated sole source aquifer. Based on the information provided, we have concluded that the project does not lie within the boundaries of a designated sole source aquifer and is thus not eligible for review under the SSA program. If you did not include the County; a legal description; project location and the latitude and longitude if available, please do so in future Sole Source Aquifer correspondence. To view a map of the Sole Source Aquifer delineation(s) for your state go to the following website. lutp://www.epa.gov/region6/water/swp/ssa/maps.htm If you have any questions on this letter or the sole source aquifer program please contact me at (214) 665-7133. Sincerely you 4 Michael Bechdol, Coordinator Sole Source Aquifer Program Ground Water/UIC Section cc: Kelly Mills, TCEQ Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Postconsumer) CO -0 (Do 0 0 -1 X c o2. -0 CD to a CD a 0 a, CITY OF ROUND ROCK Parks and Recreation Department ROUND ROCK, TEXAS 301 W. Bagdad, Suite 250 PURPOSE PASSION. PROSPERITY. Round Rock, Texas 78664 MEMORANDUM TO: Elizabeth Alvarado, CDBG Coordinator FROM: David Buzzell, Assistant Director - Parks and Recreation Department DATE: February 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Veterans Park — "No Effect" on Endangered Species As you know, the Veterans Park project scope includes repair and/or replacement of existing park features, such as trails/sidewalks, restrooms, site furnishings, pavilion, etc., that have been in place and maintained for 15+ years. The nature of the project will result in little to no environmental change to an existing park that has been in existence for over 30 years. Department staff reviewed the USFWS and NMFS Endangered Species Act — Species Search and Critical Habitat websites for Williamson County. One known occurrence of the Jollyville plateau salamander habitat was recorded 0.85 miles east of the proposed project site but no other sites have been recorded within 1.5 miles of the project site. Based on the nature of the project and information reviewed from the USFWS and NMFS websites, it is the opinion of the Parks and Recreation Department that the nature of the project will likely have "no effect" on federally protected species and critical habitat. F' ' 9 m:er,;nc•grande-b.php '0 htt .wsrtiv.rivvs. ov+ ®Googte Advanced Search ` ® ;Z 8._g . Page- Safety� Toms� 40+ » ' -� N. ..� NATIONAL WILD AND W� Y SCENIC RIVERS SYS01"EM i „Yx r a a ♦ � RICO GRANDE, TEXAS ' EXPLORE DESIGNATED RIVERS Managing Agency: A. National Park Service,Big Bend National ParkAAJ i '': ;� i Win•.,, �,�;...... `+j i •._ Designated Reach: �. November 10,1978.The segment on the United States side j j of the river from river mile 842-3 above Matiscal Canyon downstream to river trnle 851.1 at the Terrell-Val Verde ., , Choose a State v Go: ! County line. Choose a River v Go i ClasslficadonlMlleage: Wild—95.2 miles;Scenic—86.0 miles;Total—191.2 miles. Hidden canyons,ancient rock fonnations, millennia of human use,rivers are the very focus or we in the Southwest �j{httpu'!wvw.rivarsgasr maps'ronuz.php p- m 5w ®Google Advanced Search ® U •j Page- Safety- Tools• �• # t NATIONAL WILD,AM � SCENIC RIVERS SYSTEM win Pr rk r r Dfilla ,x Fort IVlyj�r4tr O ( Worth i _ vr� 1., Rn.t x Y - Austin s Rio'Grande - � Ho ust on "t, 1 *San.Antonio ;U v t (D C- 0 ;p D 0 m Z lJ U ' LJ L1 L lJ LJ CD X ly CA Conllmdad Untbd Sbbs Alaska v National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Big Bend National Park • How Far Is It? The Big Bend region is vast and isolated. Highway travel between destinations usually takes several hours and available services can be limited. Mileage from Big Bend National Park Headquarters at Panther Junction to: Abilene - 392 miles Amarillo - 481 miles Beaumont - 697 miles Brownsville - 634 miles Carlsbad Caverns Ni', New Dallas - 559 miles El Paso - 329 miles Fort Stockton -127 miles Galveston - 657 miles Houston - 610 Hailes Langtry - 211 miles Lyndon B. Johnson National Lubbock - 358 miles Marfa -126 miles Midland - 242 miles Odessa - 222 miles Padre Island Natl. Seashore - Presidio - 92 miles San Antonio - 406 miles Study Butte - 24 miles Mexico - 305 miles Historical Park - 410 miles 543 miles Alpine -100 miles Austin - 474 miles Big Spring - 281 miles Brownwood - 398 miles Corpus Christi - 526 miles Del Rio - 253 miles Fort Davis -128 miles Fort Worth - 529 miles Guadalupe Mountains NP - 275 miles Lajitas - 41 miles Laredo - 434 miles Marathon. - 69 miles McAllen - 577 miles Monahans -178 miles Ojinaga, Mexico - 93 miles Pecos -191 miles San Angelo - 300 miles Sanderson - 123 miles Terlingua - 28 miles Pagel of 2 11/16/2011 0 0 Op u04s8nle9 800? auozo 4H-8 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) 1661 auozo 41-8 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) op puri 7pod 800? auozo aH-8 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) 1661 auozo aH-8 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) m 0 (aaeJapoj) - Xl 'op osed 13 * m N 0 0 800? auozO JH -8 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) 1661 auozo -M-B Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Op uoluap 800? auozo JH -8 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) 1661 auozo �H-8 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) 800? Peal * Frisco, TX - (Nonattainment) n 0 0 800Z auozo -'H-8 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) op siaguiegD 800? auazO -+H-8 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) 1661 auozo aH-8 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) op euozeJB ;arvoston c,o 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX Harris Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Johnson Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Kaufman Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Liberty Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Montgomery Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Parker Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Rockwall Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Tarrant Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) Waller Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston-Gatveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Rockwall Co CU a7 En r0 m f0 L. CV 0 07 0 un I un i ✓ v v v .r2 t t O O yyO 0 4 4.1 t 4 V V L V O 0 0 0 LL LL LL LL N vl U1 UI f0 r0 r0 f0 f0 To To' t0 © Li d in 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Tarrant Co 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Severe 15) 8 -Hr Ozone 1997 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 0 u Dallas -Fort Worth, TX - (Moderate) 8 -Hr Ozone 2008 CityView 600 pecan round rock a E Layers i Tools - h�lf. LU W� *WAY PUD i6 y, �� I i41�1 I II us acok s►nor a streets r.. at rOR Land Use : .:f .4 Mining :PUD ss Single Family Two Family �•a,�� Y .,:U979ti a Mutd Family ~° Mixed-Use Commercial ."'. " r1P PUD 10 g FIJD 2E Educational Facility µ Zoning Districts Government/tnstitutlonal ZONING: OS Recreational/Open Space/Drainage; Open Space Zonina District Requirements NAME: MEMORIAL PARK Industrial LOCATION: Udiibes 'Pli ORD#: Agricultural v ADOPTION YEAR: Undeveloped ` a PREVIOUS ZONE: � t�E Zoning Overlays Zoom to Chisholm Trail-CT ® Historic-H ` yilAM AVE �M Pv� g Palm Valley-PV a E.P �, , OZ National Register Historic-NRH z .�.� E °N Avw w PIA)sa r I E t Zonis Districts -� S p a� 1+N . s .. Lie call other values> - r N ll Single Family Rural-SF-R Single Family Large Lot-SF-1 ' Single Family Standard Lot-SF-2 �a1i�� _ Two Family-TF 99-8 (LIME 1.0Z) slue;sits podgy pe;ea6e;ul;o ueld IeuolleN (;seeq;nos/y}nos) sexes 2/11A14 1505 Lance Ln, Round Rock r 78664bFort Hood -Goog@Maps Goole Directions to Fort Hood 53.9 mi - about 1 hour 6 mi »\Cam k ! t, , ««\ leen\ ,71-44f, ._,Efifcgrtes CankerftilOrds\ Natty\ V/ildlife Refuge /\Gobgle • +¢ k ¥demure \\d«mJ« , MKaftV201 4:6 NF/hnaAgoog*corni_psd&sourc_s kadd r,505+@nce +Lan e R_d+R= &daddeFor RHS+%4031:g5001;7.%%m«n ens. 1/6 Environmental Justice CAMPO Region February 2010 nV,ww. row comery et ar CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION For further information see: Airport Information: http://www.airnay.com/airports/ HUD Airport Hazards Q&A: http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program offices/comm planning/environment/revie w/ga/airport 13. §58.5(i) (2) Contamination and Toxic Substances a. Is the property located within the search distances of any of the types of environmental contamination sources? Approximate Minimum Search Standard Environmental Record Sources Distance (mi) Yes No /Federal NPL Site List 1 ❑ IZI -- Federal Delisted NPL Site List 0.5 ❑ El / Federal CERCLIS List 0.5 0 IZI " Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List 0.5 0.5 ❑ El Federal RCRA CORRACTS Facilities List I 0 lZi "Federal RCRA Non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities List 0.5 0 IZI Property/Adjoining 1 Federal RCRA Generators List Properties 0 El Federal Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registries Property Only 0 Federal ERNS List Property Only 0 El State- and Tribal -Equivalent NPL 1 0 IZI \/ State- and Tribal -Equivalent CERCLIS 0.5 0 v State and Tribal Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal Site Lists 0.5 0 State and Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Lists 0.5 0 Property/Adjoining State and Tribal Registered Storage Tank Lists Properties ❑ State and Tribal Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registries Property Only 0 v State and Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites 0.5 0 El State and Trial Brownfield Sites 0.5 0 b. Did a visual inspection of the site show the following? 42 c. Has the property ever been used for any of the following types of uses? Gas Station Yes No Distressed vegetation Yes No ■ 5 Vent or Fill Pipes Auto Garage ■ ►1 Storage Oil Tanks or Questionable Containers ■ ►1 ■ ►1 Pits, Ponds or Lagoons Commercial Printing Facility ■ ►/ Stained Soil or Pavement (other than water stains) ■ ►1 ■ 1 Pungent, Foul or Noxious Odors Dry Cleaners ■ ►1 Dumped Material or Soil, Mounds of Dirt, Rubble, Fill, etc. ■ ►1 ■ ►1 c. Has the property ever been used for any of the following types of uses? Gas Station Yes No Vehicle Repair Shop Yes No Car Dealership Auto Garage ■ ►, ■ ►1 Depot Commercial Printing Facility ■ ►1 ■ ►1 Industrial or commercial warehouses Dry Cleaners ■ ►1 ■ ►1 Photo Developing Laboratory Hospital ■ ►1 ■ ►1 Junkyard or landfill Agricultural/Farming Operations ■ ►1 ■ I Tannery Live stock Operations IN ►1 ■ ►/ d. Does the project have an underground storage tank other than a residential fuel tank, or known or suspected to be contaminated by toxic chemicals or radioactive materials? n Yes No e. Is the project site near an industry disposing of chemicals or hazardous wastes? n Yes ® No If No to all of the above, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If Yes to any of the above, a qualified environmental professional must undertake investigations necessary to ensure that the project is free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances such that there is no hazard which could affect the health and safety of occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. Continue. 43 f. Could nearby toxic, hazardous or radioactive substances affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property? n Yes or ❑ No Are there unresolved concerns that could lead to the RE being determined to be a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP)? ❑ Yes n No g. If Yes, continue. If No, provide written documentation from a qualified environmental professional which documents that identified potential sources of contamination does not pose a hazard which would restrict the intended uses of the property or to the occupants. h. Was an ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report completed for this project? (Note: HUD regulations do not require an ASTM Phase I ESA report for single family homes of 1-4 units. An ASTM Phase I ESA report is required for multifamily (5 or more units) and/or Non-residential properties.) ❑ Yes ❑ No i. Did the ASTM Phase I ESA or other documentation uncover any Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) or recommend a Phase II, special/specific Phase II, or recommend Phase III environmental site assessments? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, continue. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. Do ESAs or other documentation conclude that nearby toxic, hazardous or radioactive substances could affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property? ❑ Yes or ❑ No If Yes, continue below. If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. k. Did any of the ESA reports or other documentation identify the need to mitigate the environmental condition by removing, stabilizing or encapsulating the toxic substances in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate Federal, state or local oversight agency? n Yes n No If Yes, continue. 44 If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. 1. Can all adverse environmental conditions identified in any of the ESAs or other documentation be mitigated? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. List specific remedial actions or mitigations in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist, according to the requirements of the appropriate Federal, state, or local oversight agency. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, HUD cannot provide assistance for the project at this site. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Maps showing project distance to contaminated sites. Phase I (ASTM) Report. All ESAs and mitigation plans performed for this project.) For additional information see: HUD Information on Hazardous, Toxic or Radioactive Substances http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program offices/comm planning/environment/revie w/hazardous EPA Envirofacts Data: http://www.epa.gov/enviro/ EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI): http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/toxic releases.html EPA Maps: http://www.epa.gov/emefdata/em4ef.home EPA CERCLIS/NPL — Superfund database: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/query/basic.htm ATSDR "ToxFAQs" summaries about hazardous substances: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp Right -To -Know Network: http://www.rtknet.org/ 14. §58.5(j) Environmental Justice (E.O. 12898) a. Is the project located in or designed to serve a predominantly minority and low- income neighborhood? N Yes n No If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If Yes, continue. 45 b. Would there be an adverse environmental impact caused by the proposed action, or would the proposed action be subject to an existing adverse environmental impact? ❑ Yes ® No If No, compliance with this section is complete. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If Yes, perform an Environmental Justice (EJ) analysis using census, geographic and other data to determine if a low-income/minority population is disproportionately impacted. Continue. c. Will the adverse environmental impact of the proposed action disproportionately impact minority and low-income populations relative to the community -at -large? Yes No If No, compliance with this section is complete. Document the determination of no disproportionate impacts. Mark box "A" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If Yes, Mitigation or avoidance of adverse impacts must be considered to the extent practicable; and, public participation processes must involve the affected population(s) in the decision-making process. Continue. d. Has the mitigation plan been approved by the RE and the impacted community? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, compliance with this section is complete. Include mitigation plan in the mitigation section of the Statutory Checklist. Mark box "B" on the Statutory Checklist for this authority. If No, Project cannot move forward until EJ issue is mitigated to the satisfactory of the RE and impacted community. Comments: Cite and attach source documentation: (Mapping of low-income and minority populations in the vicinity of the project site. EJ analysis. Mitigation Plan.) For additional information see: EJ maps & analysis, by location: http://www.scorecard.org/community/ej-index.tcl EPA's "EJ View" Tool provides information relevant to EJ assessments: http://epamap14.epa.gov/ejmap/entry.html Census data and maps also avail -able at: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/j sf/pages/index. xhtml Tract -level data on race & income: http://www.ffiec.gov/geocode 46 15. Summary of Mitigation Measures: (Required for Incorporation into Project Design, included in Public Notices, and included as requirements of contracts, grants, loans, etc.) 8 Step Process Early and Final Notice of Project in a Floodplain 16. References: (List the Federal, State, or local agencies contacted to obtain their existing environmental reports and other data used for the environmental review of the proposed project.) EPA TCEQ Texas Historical Commission 17. List of Major Reports Obtained: (Attach report(s), such as wetlands delineation studies, biological evaluations or habitat assessments, Phase I and II environmental site assessments.) N/A 47