The URL can be used to link to this page

G-05-04-14-13A1 - 4/14/2005ORDINANCE NO. O-o5-oJ-/sI AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1 OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS - TRANSPORTATION CRITERIA MANUAL ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. G-04-12-16-13A1, TO AMEND TABLE 1-7; TO REVISE FIGURES 1-6 THROUGH 1-7, FIGURES 1-12 THROUGH 1-17, FIGURES 1-21 THROUGH 1-25, FIGURE 1-25a, AND FIGURE 1-29; AND PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS: I. Section 1, Table 1-7 of the City of Round Rock Design and Construction Standards - Transportation Criteria Manual, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Exhibit A, Table 1-7, attached hereto and made a part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance. II. Section 1, Figures 1-6 through 1-7, Figures 1-12 through 1-18, Figures 1-2] through 1-25, Figure 1-25a, and Figure 1-29 of the City of Round Rock Design and Construction Standards - Transportation Criteria Manual, are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with Exhibit B, Figures 1-6 through 1-7, Figures 1-12 through 1-17, Figures 1-21 through 1-25, Figure 1-25a, and Figure 1-29, attached hereto and made a part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance. @PFDesktop\::0 /WORLDOX/0:/WDOX/ORDINANC/050324C1.WPD/vr III. A. All ordinances, parts of ordinances, or resolutions in conflict herewith are expressly repealed. B. The invalidity of any section or provision of this ordinance shall not invalidate other sections or provisions thereof. C. The City Council herebyfinds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of the meeting at which this Ordinance was adopted was posted and that such meeting was open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Ordinance and the subject matter hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended.rr�� READ and APPROVED on first reading this the [75 I' day of , 2005. READ, PPROVED and ADOPTED on second reading this the ILA day of�'1�� 2005. \ � � � n l A �m� LtJ�I,'l�i K / R . WELL, ayor City of Round Rock, Texas CHRISTINE R. MARTINEZ, City Secreta 2 Table 1-7 Geometric Design Criteria Summary Table Functional Classification TCM Figure ROW Width (Feet) Paving Width LOG- LOG OGLOG (Feet) Median Width LOG - LOG (Feet) Curb Basis (Feet) Design Speed (mph) Typical Length of Street (Feet) Local Typical Spacing of Cross Street (Feet) Minimum Centerline Radius (Feet) Side- walk Width (Feet) Local, Residential 1-29 50 27 9.5 25,30 <1500 300 180,300 4 Local, Non - Residential 1-30 65 37 12 25, 30 <1500 300 180,300 4 Local, Rural 1-31 90 27 27.5 25, 30 <1500 300 180,300 4 TCM Supplemental #1 EXHIBIT i vAn 1-26 Collectors MAD 4 Local (No Parking) 1-32 65 27 - 17 30, 35 <1 mi 300 300,470 4 Local(w/Parking) 1-33 65 37 - 12 35 1-2 mi 500 470 4 Major (4 -Lane) 1-34 80 48 - 14 35 <2 mi 500 470 4 Major(5-Lane) 1-35 90 60 - 13 35 <2 mi 500 470 4 Major(4-Lane Divided) 1-36 100 2@24 20 14 var > 1mi 1000 var 5 TCM Supplemental #1 EXHIBIT i vAn 1-26 Arterials MAD 4 1-37 100 2@24 20 14 45 >1 mi 1000 1000 5 MAD 6 1-38 124 2@36 20 14 45 >1 mi 1000 1000 5 MAD 8 1-39 150 2@48 20 17 50 >2 mi 1300 1400 5 TCM Supplemental #1 EXHIBIT i vAn 1-26 Table 1-7 (Cont'd) Geometric Design Criteria Summary Table Functional Classification Min. Tangent Length sep. curves Max. Sust'nd Grade (%) Max. Grade <500' (%) Minimum Horizontal Tangent Length Approaching Min. Spacing between Median Opening Minimum Landing w/ Grade <2% Approaching Loc Col Art Loc Col Art Local Local, Residential 50 9 9 50 50 50 - 50 50 50 Local, Non- Residential 50 9 9 50 50 50 - 50 50 50 Local, Rural 50 9 9 50 50 50 - Collectors Local (No Parking) 100 7 7 50 50 50 - 80 80 100 Local (w/Parking) 100 7 7 50 50 50 - 80 80 125 Major (4- Lane) 100 7 7 50 75 75 - 80 80 125 Major(5- Lane) 100 7 7 50 75 75 - 80 80 125 Major (4 -Lane Divided) 100 7 7 50 75 75 Var 80 100 125 Arterials MAD 4 150 6 6 - 75 75 450 Minimum 750 Desirable - 125 125 MAD 6 200 6 6 - 75 75 450 Minimum 750 Desirable - 125 125 MAD 6 200 6 6 - 75 100 450-750 - 125 125 1-27 Figure 1-6 Intersection Nose Treatment, Six Lane Divided Roadways -Madam rP Rocs us • €1 stence may vary en ake++ad Interne©taons, provided that the 75' aor6tra1 rw htar xa achsevwd 1-34 Figure 1-7 Intersection Nose Treatment, Six Lane Divided and Neighborhood Collector #ion 4tcfLhE1 itazirdtTurn 01011,4 }MEN MINIM MIME Ehatanee may vary an ska►rad xntereeotions pravidad that Its* 5` control radushiav+�d. 1-35 Figure 1-12 Typical Median Application for Providing Left Turn Deceleration and Storage into Driveways or Cross Streets 1-40 Figure 1-13 Typical Median Application for Providing Crossing Vehicle Protection from a Driveway or Cross Street 1-41 °G Lo LoC, Figure 1-14 Typical Median Application Limiting Movement to Entering Left Turn - One Direction 1-42 LAG >_a 1-.0C. Figure 1-15 Typical Median Application Limiting Movement to Entering Left Turn - Two Direction 1-43 Figure 1-16 Typical Median Application Providing "U" Turn Movements 1-44 o C. LA LOG Figure 1-17 Typical Median Application, Channelized "T" 1-45 Figure 1-18 Median Breaks ea A a Bay Tepee from Figure 1'H— _g :enem B -` Storage Length from Table 1-S Diatom. C •'loqu red Speomg from Toble 1-4 1-46 Figure 1-21 Design Criteria for Elbow Streets 1-49 Figure 1-22 Design Criteria for Corner Bubble 1-50 Figure 1-23 Design Criteria for Local Cul -de -Sac Loc. L. LoCz Io, 1-51 Figure 1-24 Design Criteria for Commercial Cul -de -Sac 1-52 Figure 1-25 Design Criteria for Industrial Cul -de -Sac 1-53 Figure 1-25A Design Criteria for Open -Ended Cul -de -Sac PLAN VIEW • Right -of -Way Width et Property Line Must Equal Right -of -Wow Width of Throat- aan and ` •- is 1-54 Figure 1-29 Design Criteria for Local Residential Streets 5.0, OW 13.8 13.8 6" Parabolic Crown 5.S 1-58 DATE: April 8, 2005 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting - April 14, 2005 ITEM: *13.A.1. Consider an ordinance amending the City of Round Rock Design and Construction Standards to revise Section 1 of the Street Design Criteria of the Transportation Criteria Manual. (Second Reading) Department: Transportation Services Staff Person: Tom Martin, Director Justification: Based on public comment received during the approval process on the Design and Construction Standards (DACS), it was requested that the right-of-way width for residential streets be reduced from 55 -feet to 50 -feet. To accomplish this change, Table 1-7 and Figure 1-29 were both revised, reducing the right-of-way width to 50 -feet. Additionally, pen and ink changes were made to Figures 1-5 through 1-7, Figures 1-12 through 1-18, and Figures 1-21 through 1-25a. Funding: Cost: N/A Source of funds: N/A Outside Resources: N/A Background Information: The revised subdivision ordinance went into effect on January 1, 2005. The Design and Construction Standards, which included the General Guidelines, Drainage Criteria Manual, Standard Specification Criteria Manual, Transportation Criteria Manual, and Utility Criteria Manual, were approved on December 16, 2004. Public Comment: N/A