The URL can be used to link to this page

Z-01-07-12-10B2 - 7/12/2001ORDINANCE NO. Z• ' 01-07- i s - 106 Z AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS ADOPTED IN SECTION 11.305(2), CODE OF ORDINANCES (1995 EDITION), CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, AND MAKING THIS AMENDMENT A PART OF THE SAID OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, TO WIT: TO ADOPT ORIGINAL ZONING ON 141.69 ACRES AND TO RE -ZONE 35.33 ACRES OF LAND, CURRENTLY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY -STANDARD LOT (SF -2), TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT NO. 47. WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council of the City of Round Rock, Texas to amend the Official Zoning Map to adopt original zoning on 141.69 acres and to re -zone 35.33 acres, currently zoned as Single Family -Standard Lot (SF -2), as Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 47, said tracts being described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein, and WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the requested change in the Official Zoning Map to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its recommendation and report, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing concerning the requested change on the 20' day of June, 2001, following lawful publication of the notice of said public hearing, and WHEREAS, after considering the public testimony received at such hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the Official Zoning Map be amended so that the zoning O:\WPDOCS\ORDINANC\010712B2.WPD/cdc classification of the property described in Exhibit "A" be changed to PUD No. 47, and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of July, 2001, after proper notification, the City Council held a public hearing on the requested amendment, and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the zoning provided for herein promotes the health, safety, morals and protects and preserves the general welfare of the community, and WHEREAS, each and every requirement set forth in Chapter 211, Sub -Chapter A., Texas Local Government Code, and Section 11.300, Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas concerning public notices, hearings, and other procedural matters has been fully complied with, Now Therefore BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, THAT: I. That the City Council has hereby determined the Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 47 meets the following goals and objectives: (1) The development in PUD No. 47 is equal to or superior to development that would occur under the standard ordinance requirements. (2) P.U.D. No. 47 is in harmony with the general purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the General Plan. 2. (3) P.U.D. No. 47 does not have an undue adverse effect upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utilities or any other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. (4) P.U.D. No. 47 will be adequately provisioned by essential public facilities and services including streets, parking, drainage, water, wastewater facilities, and other necessary utilities. (5) P.U.D. No. 47 will be constructed, arranged and maintained so as not to dominate, by scale and massing of structures, the immediate neighboring properties or interfere with their development or use in accordance with any existing zoning district. II. That the Official Zoning Map adopted in Section 11.305(2), Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas is hereby amended so that the zoning classification of the property described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein shall be, and is hereafter designated as Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 47, and that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to enter into the Agreement and Development Plan for PUD No. 47 attached hereto as Exhibit "B", which agreement shall govern the development and use of said property. III. A. All ordinances, parts of ordinances, or resolutions in conflict herewith are expressly repealed. 3. B. The invalidity of any section or provision of this ordinance shall not invalidate other sections or provisions thereof. Alternative 1. By motion duly made, seconded and passed with an affirmative vote of all the Council members present, the requirement for reading this ordinance on two separate days was dispensed with. READ, PASSED, and ADOPTED on first reading this / ad day of , 2001. Alternative 2. READ and APPROVED on first reading this the day of , 2001. READ, APPROVED and ADOPTED on second reading this the _ day of ATTEST: NE LAND, City Secretary , 2001. ROS T A. S L KA, JR.,f ayor City of Round Rock, Texas 4. Turtle Creek PUD #47 00-038.ZC REQUEST: Approval of the zoning PUD District #47. HISTORY: Tract 1 has no previous zoning history (PUD will be original zoning). Tract 2 was zoned SF -2 with ordinance Z -94-01-13- 8H on January 13, 1994. DATE OF REVIEW: 6/20/01 OWNER: Continental Homes of Texas CONSULTING ENGINEER: Carter & Burgess, Inc. DESCRIPTION: Tract 1: 141.69 acres, P.A. Holder Survey A-297 Tract 2: 35.33 acres, P.A. Holder Survey A-297 PRESENT ZONING: Tract 1: None: Outside of City-Unzoned Tract 2: SF -2 -Single Family Residential PRESENT LAND USE: Generally vacant LOCATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: PROPOSED LAND USE: KEY PUD PROVISIONS: Planner: Jim Stendebach North of Round Rock East, east of Greenslopes Subdivision, south of Lake Creek and west of South Creek Subdivision North: Lake Creek and Undeveloped land South: Round Rock East - large lot single family East: South Creek Subdivision - single family residential West: Greenslopes Subdivision - single family residential Multiuse residential; this includes the following: 1. 88 acres of detatched single family residential 2. 22 acres of attached single family residential town house and condominiums for sale 3. 10.5 acre elementary school 4. 1 acre day care 5. 38 acres park and open space 6. Remainder consists of major streets and Forsman life estate 1. Provides right-of-way for A.W. Grimes Boulevard. 2. Provides approximately 38 acres of parkland which will accommodate the city trail system. 3. Provides two additional access points for South Creek Subdivision. 4. Provides Elementary School site. 5. Provides green strip adjacent to South Creek and Greenslopes subdivisions. 6. Provides day care site. 7. Provides for street trees and median trees. 8. Eliminates most driveways to streets. 9. Provides for a "traditional" neighborhood design with smaller lots and reduced front setbacks with alley access. (88 acres or single family detached). 10. Provides for 22 acres of townhouse and "big house" condominium -units with "traditional design" and alley access. 11. Density based on the number units that could be developed on site using standard SF -2 zoning standards. GENERAL PLAN POLICY: Residential UTILITIES: The development proposes standard municipal services. STAFF COMMENTS: The PUD complies with the general plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. 1/.1111 P. _ /��11►�i� �11 4•FP- 0 i 7rir r vii E1 mummm ovum aFlip ■■ ■■■/*� V. MEM 11111111111111111111111111111121 11■/11111111' 11/11111111110 111111111/1110 111111111111/21 •iw.,iili j 62 11111111111111010 121/Q 1111�11�� _.. D!i - .. .map/ mum.ii IIn1�1 ... I ii .. .. .. .. : ■111\•Tj margrA • • • • • • i1 i fAnumi•.• 4* 11muusil U•t"Tir 1 on &rdm Turtle Creek PUD #47, 00-038.ZC TURTLE CREEK PUD # 47 ZONING CASE • • • tonsto 111111100 11100010 nnumIm niniinii 4 0 1►nnmtnnn►* MAE OS is Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres EXHIBIT A - TRACT 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 141.69 ACRES OF OUT OF THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY NO. 9, ABSTRACT 297, IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 141.69 ACRES OF LAND BEING THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 153.25 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO CARL ANTON FORSMAN, ET AL, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 128, PAGE 456 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 141.69 ACRE TRACT ALSO BEING A PORTION OF THE 151.37 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a'/ -inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of the following described 151.37 acre tract, being the southwest corner of Lot 11, Block A of South Creek Section One, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 66 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being in the north line of Block B of South Creek Section Seventeen, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 230 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, with the south line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the north Zine of the said South Creek Section Seventeen, S 83°28'55" W, passing at a distance of 504.36 feet a 1/4 -inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of a called 1.50 are tract of land described in a deed to Hugh Noel as recorded in Document No. 9652164 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the northeast corner of Round Rock East, a subdivision, continuing with the south line of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said Round Rock East, passing at a distance of 1615.16 feet a'/ -inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of the said Round Rock East, being a northeast corner of a called 16.812 acre Park Site as shown on Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet D, Slide 70 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, continuing with the south line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said Park Site, a total distance of 1758.54 feet to a 5" fence corner post found for the southwest corner of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the northwest corner of the said Park Site, and being in the east line of Block A of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two; THENCE, with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said Block A, N 04°40'12" W, passing at a distance of 485.27 feet the northeast corner of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two, being the southeast corner of Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 115 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, continuing a total distance of 635.97 feet to a '/z -inch iron rod found for an angle point in the east Zine of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine; THENCE, continuing the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, the following ten (10) courses: 1. N 05°37'14" W, a distance of 303.14 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 01 °53'59" W, a distance of 134.84 feet to a 60-D nail found; 3. N 01"42'46" E, a distance of 271.01 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 04°49'10" W, a distance of 297.49 feet to a'/- inch iron rod found; 5. N 05°46'57" W, a distance of 248.36 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; Page 1 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 6. N 03°39'14" W, a distance of 184.70 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 7. N 05°05'29" W, a distance of 247.21 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 8. N 05°31'59" W, a distance of 214.93 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 9. N 05°11'44" W, a distance of 274.53 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 10. N 05°47'57" W, a distance of 48.62 feet to a %-inch iron rod found, for the northeast corner of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, being a southeast corner of the remainder of a called 231.374 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Gaston Development Co. and Garland Development Co. as recorded in Volume 710, Page 700 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 231.374 acre tract the following five (5) courses: 1. N 04°42'21" W, a distance of 274.53 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 14°35'00" W, a distance of 68.55 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 01°12'00" W, a distance of 58.95 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 19°18'53" E, a distance of 57.66 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 5. N 30°12'00" W, a distance of 47.68 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set, for the northeast corner of the said 231.374 acre tract, being the southeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 6.591 acre tract the following four (4) courses: 1. N 36°28'50" W, a distance of 39.42 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 22°05'00" W, a distance of 34.83 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 00°40'00" E, a distance of 122.92 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 521.98 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set, for the northwest corner of said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of the said 6.591 acre tract, and being in the southeast line of a Union Pacific Railroad, (formerly known as International and Great Northern Company Railroad) 100' right-of-way as recorded in Volume 17, Page 705 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, from which a 1 -inch iron pipe with bolt found bears N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 1.65 feet; THENCE, with the northwest line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the southeast line of the said Union Pacific right-of-way, the following two (2) courses: Page 2 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 1. N 72°31'19" E, a distance of 465.41 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. a distance of 476.44 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 07°39'26", with a radius of 3564.94 feet and whose chord bears N 71°15'15" E, a distance of 476.08 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set for the northwest corner of a called 2.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to David L. Carlin and Mary C. Carlin as recorded in Document No. 9759883 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for a northeast corner of said 151.37 acre tract; THENCE, leaving the southeast line of the said Union Pacific Railroad, being the northwest line of the original 153.25 acre tract, with the boundary of the said 2.0 acre tract and said 151.37 acre tract, the following six (6) courses: 1. S 14°40'00" E, at a distance of 7.82 feet to 1/2 inch iron rod found, a total distance of 211.08 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 2. N 53°39'15" E, a distance of 67.99 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 3. N 78°14'55" E, a distance of 88.43 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 4. S 78°19'58" E, a distance of 71.77 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 5. S 64°43'52" E, a distance of 120.44 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 6. S 70°33'46" E, a distance of 56.11 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek, being the southeast corner of the said 2.0 acre tract, being a northeast corner of said 151.37 acre tract, and being in the west line of a called 42.478 acre tract of land described in a deed to Richard C. Jennings as recorded in Document No. 9558188 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said 42.478 acre tract, the following two (2) courses: 1. S 14°38'22" E, a distance of 312.87 feet to a fence post on a cattle guard; 2. S 14°36'27" E, a distance of 1460.07 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; THENCE, continuing with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of a called 1.7 acre tract of land described in a deed to J & S Group, Ltd. as recorded in Volume 2525, Page 841 and Volume 2532, Page 623 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being the west line of South Creek Section Twenty, Phase One, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet L, Slide 201 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, S 07°00'43" E a distance of 545.21 feet to a '/z -inch iron rod found for the southwest corner of the said South Creek Section Twenty, Phase One, being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block B of South Creek Section Seven, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet G, Slide 259 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Seven, and the west line of the said South Creek Section One, the following two (2) courses: 1. S 06° 58' 17" E, a distance of 1507.12 feet to a 11/2 -inch iron pipe found for an angle point, and Page 3 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres. FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 2. S 07° 33' 54" E, a distance of 165.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 151.37 acres of land. SAVING AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following 9.68 acre tract of land: BEGINNING at a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found, being the northwest corner of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas, and being in the southeast line of a Union Pacific Railroad, (formerly known as International and Great Northern Company Railroad) 100' right-of-way as recorded in Volume 17, Page 705 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, from which a 1 -inch iron pipe with bolt found bears N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 1.65 feet; THENCE, with the northwest line of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the southeast line of the said Union Pacific right-of-way, the following two (2) courses: 1. N 72°31'19" E, a distance of 465.41 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found; 2. a distance of 476.44 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 07°39'26", with a radius of 3564.94 feet and whose chord bears N 71°15'15" E, a distance of 476.08 feet to a 5/8 - inch iron rod with cap found being the northwest corner of a called 2.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to David L. Carlin and Mary C. Carlin as recorded in Document No. 9759883 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the northeast corner of the said 151.37 acre tract; THENCE, leaving the southeast line of the said Union Pacific Railroad, being the northwest line of the said 151.37 acre tract, with the boundary of the said 2.0 acre tract and the said 151.37 acre tract, S 14°40'00" E, at a distance of 7.82 feet to 1/2 inch iron rod found, a total distance of 211.08 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: THENCE leaving the said boundary of the 2.0 acre tract and the 151.37 acre tract and crossing the said 151.37 acre tract the following seven (7) courses: 1. S 66° 50' 34" W, a distance of 163.08 feet to a point, 2. S 46° 48' 11" W, a distance of 307.03 feet to a point, 3. S 63° 14' 57" W, a distance of 102.12 feet to a point, 4. S 29° 13' 49" W, a distance of 140.23 feet to a point, 5. S 43° 17' 30" W, a distance of 292.61 feet to a point, 6. S 30° 10' 55" W, a distance of 143.90 feet to a point, Page 4 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 7. S 80° 43' 01" W, a distance of 108.09 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found, on the west line of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of the remainder of a called 231.374 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Gaston Development Co. and Garland Development Co. as recorded in Volume 710, Page 700 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the southeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 6.591 acre tract the following four (4) courses: 1. N 36°28'50" W, a distance of 39.42 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 22°05'00" W, a distance of 34.83 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 00°40'00" E, a distance of 122.92 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. North, a distance of 521.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 9.68 acres of land, more or less, and CONTAINING A NET TOTAL OF 141.69 ACRES OF LAND. THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the2th day of April, 2001 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 Page 5 of 5 J • n Strawbridg Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas POINT OF BEGINNING 1 SE HOOVER 2.201 ACRES Kt. 2150, PO. 450 1.040$14: s 14'40100' 211.04' DAVID 1.. CAR1N MARY C. CANN 2.0 A0. DCC. 0764803 IV *MINN OO Off. IS. OIL N 00'40'00' E 122.92' 22'05'00' w /4•113e N 36'24'50' w 39.42' R 44'50'34' w 163.04 " 's warty'w 307.03' s 63'14'57" W 102.12' TNIS.f mV Ra a. s 24'13'49' w 140.23' 4317130' W 292.61' 3090'55' W 143.90' s 60'43'01' W 105.09' JII0E3 d N OVE0 27.01 ACRES Y0.040, PQ 1PG. 114 Ir RIIO. A VOL MI R 714 Rif I IV SII 1.a MT SCALE : 1" = 500' ARRIL, 2001 TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS AMER A. OEIFR e URINE B. 1E1E11 ,VOI. 1784 PSC 442 SUE HOOVER 23.217 AC. V0. 2131. PO. 21e I•PAL 1O VOL VOL IRR VP 151.37 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000066004 811. NM=f. O MI MOO IV 4 m. MIDST R 1314 R NI 33.61 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000065504 1.7 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000066002 R IMO. is SOUTH CREEK SEC. SEVEN CAO. G S. 254 LOOM1 ON. SHEET 3 OF 3 ONOSA T555. CAB. F. SL 300 LEGEND • MARK ON CATTLE GUARD • WOOD FENCE POST o IRON PIPE FOUND • IRON ROD FOUND O IRON ROD SET 4 NAIL FOUND Q CALCULATED POINT M c0 0 0 O W 0 E-4 W z CL 0 v 0 C7 V 33.61 Acre Tract Jennings Boundary EXHIBIT A - TRACT 2 FN00-066 (A.Y.) Sept. 20, 2000. C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 A DESCRIPTION OF 33.61 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THE REMAINDER OF A 42.478 ACRE TRACT TO RICHARD C. JENNINGS AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT # 9558188 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a iron rod found on the east line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract being the northeast corner of the said tract, and being the northwest corner of South Creek Section Two, a subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 266 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas THENCE with the said east line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Two, the following three (3) courses: 1. S 02°36'29" W, 140.95 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. S 00°14'37" E, 902.66 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 3. S 01°03'27" E, passing at 29.03 feet the most northerly southwest corner of the said South Creek Section Two, being the northwest corner of South Creek Section Six, a subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 360 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, in all 93.21 feet to a iron rod with cap set at the north line of a 1.7 acre tract, to J & S Group as recorded in volume 2525, page 841 and Volume 2532, Page ddm623 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, THENCE leaving the said east line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Six, with the said north line of the 1.7 acre tract, the following five (5) courses: 1. N 88°15'15" W, 32.98 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. a distance of 159.80 feet with an arc of a curve to the right whose central angle is 07°02'24", with a radius of 1300.56 feet and whose chord bears N 84°44'03" W, a distance of 159.70 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 3. N 81°12'51" W, 275.21 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 4. a distance of 212.01 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 31°03'02", with a radius of 391.21 feet and whose chord bears S 83°15'43" W, a distance of 209.43 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 5. S 67°44'12" W, 252.62 feet to a iron rod with cap set, at the west line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the east line of a 153.25 acre tract to Carl Anton Forsman, as recorded in Volume 128, Page 456, and Volume 208, Page 462 of the Deed Records of Williamson County Texas, THENCE with the said west line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the east line of the 153.25 acre tract the following two courses: 1. N 07°00'43" W, 143.78 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. N 14°36'27" W, 1460.07 feet to a point on a cattle guard: 3. N 14°38'22" W, 312.87 feet to a point, on the north line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the south line of a 27.61 acre tract to James J. Hoover, as recorded in volume 649, page 114 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the approximate centerline of Lake Creek, Page 1 of 2 33.61 Acre Tract Jennings Boundary FN00-066 (A.Y.) Sept. 20, 2000 C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 THENCE with the said north line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the said south line of the 27.61 acre tract, being the south line of a 1.5 acre tract to Roger A. Miller & Suzanne B. Miller, as recorded in Volume 790, Page 892, being the south line of a 23.217 acre tract to Sue Hoover, as recorded in Volume 2137, Page 218 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being the approximate centerline of Lake Creek, the following four (4) courses: 1. S 52°29'43" E, 613.25 feet to a point, 2. S 68°54'51" E, 325.04 feet to a point, 3. S 74°13'13" E, 365.00 feet to a point, 4. S 73°12'53" E, 240.68 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 33.61 acres of land more or less. THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property described herein is based upon a survey performed under my direction and supervision during September, 2000. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, September, 2000 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 Texas, this the 20th day of Page 2of2 John Straw: ridge Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas EXHIBIT A - TRACT 3 1.7 Acre Tract Southerly Portion of 3.416 Ac. Drainage Easement PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FN01-067 (JRS) April 20, 2001 C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 A DESCRIPTION OF 1.7 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THE 1.7 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P., AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT # 2000066002 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1.7 Acres of land situated in the P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 in Williamson County, Texas, being the remainder of a called 8.904 acre tract described in the deed of record in Volume 2532, Page 623 and in Volume 2525, Page 841, Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, SAVE AND EXCEPT all that portion of land described and platted as SOUTH CREEK SECTION TWENTY, PHASE 1, recorded in Cabinet L, Slide 201, Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property described herein is based upon a survey performed under my direction and supervision during September, 2000. A.D. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the 20th day of April, 2001 Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 JOHN STRAWBRIDGE Page 1 of 1 John Strawbridge Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas EXHIBIT B AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 47 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON THIS AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN (this "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Round Rock, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation, having its offices at 221 East Main Street, Round Rock, Texas 78664 (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"). WHEREAS, the Owner has submitted a request to the City to zone approximately 177 acres of land as a Planned Unit Development ("PUD"), said property being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred to as the "Property" or "Turtle Creek Village PUD"), and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11, Section 11.316(8), Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, the Owner has submitted a development plan setting forth the development conditions and requirements within the PUD (the "Development Plan"), which Development Plan is contained in Section II of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Owner's application for a PUD. NOW THEREFORE BY THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the City and the Owner agrees as follows: I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. CONFORMITY WITH DEVELOPMENT PLAN All uses and development within the Property shall generally conform to the Development Plan set forth in Article II herein. 2. CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS No changes or modifications will be made to this Agreement or the Development Plan unless all provisions pertaining to changes or modifications as stated in Article III, Section 1 below are followed. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Development Agreement 3. ZONING VIOLATION The Owner understands that any person, firm, corporation or other entity violating any conditions or terms of the Development Plan shall be subject to any and all penalties for the violation of any zoning ordinance as stated in Section 1.601, Code of Ordinances, (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, as amended. 4. CONCEPT PLAN Approval of this Ordinance shall constitute approval of the Concept Plan for the Turtle Creek Village PUD. 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5.1 Assignment. Neither party may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without having first obtained the prior written consent of the other which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section shall not prevent the Owner from conveying the Property or portions of the Property, together with all development rights and obligations contained in this Agreement. 5.2 Necessary Documents and Actions. Each party agrees to execute and deliver all such other and further instruments and undertake such actions as are or may become necessary or convenient to effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 5.3 Severability. In case any one or more provisions contained herein are deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions hereof and in such event, this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. 5.4 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understandings or representations of the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 5.5 Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Development Agreement State of Texas. 5.6 Venue. All obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas and venue for any action arising hereunder shall be in Williamson County. 5.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any person or entity, other than the parties hereto (and their respective successors and assigns) any rights, benefits or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement. 5.8 Duplicate Originals. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each of equal dignity. 5.9 Notices. Until changed by written notice thereof, any notice required under this Agreement may be given to the respective parties by certified mail, postage prepaid or by hand delivery to the address of the other party shown below: OWNER: CITY OF ROUND ROCK: Continental Homes of Texas, L.P. Attn: Mr. Terry Mitchell 12554 Riata Vista Circle rd Floor Austin, TX 78727 5.10 Effective Date. City of Round Rock, Texas 212 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 Attn: Director of Planning This Agreement shall be effective from and after the date of due execution hereof by all parties. 5.11 Binding Effect. This Agreement and the Development Plan binds and benefits the Owner and its successors and assigns. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Development Agreement II. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. DEFINITIONS Words and terms used herein, not specifically defined in this section, shall have their usual force and meaning, or as defined in the Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "the Code". For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section: Alley. A minor private right-of-way, either two-way or one-way, located through the interior of blocks within a parcel owned by the Homeowners Association and providing vehicular and service access to the side or rear of properties; use of the parcels is for the benefit of adjoining property owners and is subject to limitations, rules and restrictions of the Homeowners Association. Appurtenances. Spires, belfries, cupolas, water tanks, ventilators, chimneys or other appurtenances usually required to be placed above the roof level and not intended for human occupancy and not exceeding ten feet (10') in height. Carport. A structure with one or more sides, covered with a roof and constructed specifically for the storage of one or more vehicles. Civic Uses. A parcel designated for cultural services use, private primary education facilities use, primary educational facilities use or child development centers (daycare). Common open space. A parcel of land or an area of water, or a combination of land and water, which may include floodplain and wetland areas, within a development site and intended for the use and enjoyment of residents of the development and, where designated, the community at large. Condominium building. A building or portion thereof used or intended to be used as a home for two (2) or more households living independently of each other. Dry Utilities Public utilities other than water, wastewater and storm sewer. These include but are not necessarily limited to electricity, gas, telephone, cablevision and other communication system lines. Exhibits to PUD. The following is a list of exhibits to this PUD Ordinance: Exhibit "A" — Property description Exhibit "B" — Affidavit of No Liens Exhibit "C" — Single Family Detached Standards TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 4 Development Agreement Exhibit "D" — Single Family Attached Standards Exhibit "E" — Open Space Standards Exhibit "F" — Parking Standards Exhibit "G" — Daycare Standards Exhibit "H" — Street Sections Exhibit "I" — Planting Strips Exhibit "J" — TIA Exhibit "K" — Land Use Plan Exhibit "L" — Phasing Plan Exhibit "M"- License Agreement Forsman Life Estate Lot. A one -acre tract of land situated within the boundaries of the Turtle Creek Village PUD, on which a resident, Paul Forsman, currently resides. Owner has conveyed a life estate to Paul Forsman; Owner plans to develop this property pursuant to this Ordinance at such time that the property is released to Owner. Front Porch. An unairconditioned roofed structure attached to the front of a house. Side and rear porches are not subject to these same requirements. A front porch may include ramps for handicapped access. Enclosure of front porches shall not be permitted. A restrictive covenant forbidding enclosure of front porches shall be placed on the property and shall be enforced by the Homeowners Association. Homeowners Association ("HOA"). An organization made up of the property owners in the area, which is responsible for maintenance of private alleys, and the open spaces not conveyed to the City, and which shall have the authority to make and collect assessments sufficient to operate and maintain private alleys, street trees and open spaces. A Homeowners Association shall be created for Turtle Creek Village PUD; the documents creating the HOA shall be recorded with this Agreement. Open Style Fence A fence designed to enclose a private yard, which abuts a park, green strip, golf course or alley. The required features of this fence include the ability to see through the fence (a minimum of 50% of the fence surface area shall be open), construction of low maintenance materials and posts or columns set in concrete.. The maximum height of an open style fence shall be 42 inches in a street yard ( street yards do not include alleys) and 48 inches for fences other than wrought iron or equivalent fences in other yards. Wrought iron or equivalent fences shall not exceed six feet in height. Masonry columns are permitted as part of all Open Style Fences. Pedestrian Way. An access way located within Residential Condominium development areas providing pedestrian movement within the area. Plan. The criteria and specifications as set forth in this Development Plan and the accompanying layout which is attached hereto as Exhibit "K". Planting Strip. A portion of land of public street right-of-way or a portion of land abutting private property, which is reserved for the purpose of landscaping and TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 5 Development Agreement installation of street trees. Cross sections of various street rights-of-way and abutting private property reflecting these planting strips are attached hereto as Exhibit "I". Private Interior Drive. A minor private access way either two-way or one-way, located within Residential Condominium development areas and providing vehicular and other access to public streets. All private interior drives will be maintained by the Homeowners Association for the area. Protected Trees. A protected tree, for the purpose of this PUD, is an individual tree of a tree species identified as protected in the City Code with a diameter of nineteen inches (19") or greater if located in a proposed street right-of-way or a diameter of eight inches (8") or greater if located on a townhouse or condominium lot. Residential Condominium. The use of a site for two (2) or more dwelling units, within one or more condominium buildings with each dwelling unit having a private external entrance and private parking and having one or more common walls. All common areas that form part of a Residential Condominium development shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association for private open space. Residential Street. The entire width included in any public right-of-way which is open for the use of the public to accommodate motor vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists and transit facilities. • A "standard residential collector" provides circulation within neighborhoods to carry circulation from local streets to arterial streets, • An "alternative residential collector street" provides circulation within neighborhoods to carry circulation from local streets to arterial streets using a smaller street section than a standard collector. • A "boulevard collector" is a short distance, low speed circulation corridor, that traverses a residential area and segregates the traffic and parking activity from opposing traffic. • A "standard local street" is a street designed primarily for access to abutting residential property. • An "alternative local street" is a street designed primarily for access to abutting residential property using a smaller street section than a standard local street. • An "access street" is a low volume street which is parallel and adjacent to an arterial street or open space area which primarily provides access to abutting properties located on one side of the lane. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 6 Development Agreement Residential Townhouse. The use of a series of sites for two or more dwelling units, constructed with common or abutting walls and each located on a separate ground parcel within the total development site, together with common area serving all dwelling units within the townhouse group. "Shall", "must", "will", "should", and "may". The words "shall", "must", and "will" are always mandatory. The words "should" and "may" are discretionary. Single Family Residential. A small lot single-family detached residential subdivision that allows the lot size to be reduced with the resulting space gained being assigned to common open space. Shared driveway. A paved vehicular access designed to residential driveway standards, which extends to and branches off to two (2) or more homes; which is privately owned and maintained and does not require a turn around area at the end of the driveway. Shared driveways shall not exceed one hundred fifty feet (150') in length. Single-family Attached Residential. The use of a series of sites for two or more dwelling units, constructed with common or abutting walls. Residential Condominium and Residential Townhouse may both be implemented as single-family attached residential. Single-family Detached Residential. The use of a site for only one dwelling unit with an attached or detached garage unit. Traffic calming measures. Street design elements intended to reduce the speed of vehicular traffic, which shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to the approval of construction drawings for each final plat. 2. PROPERTY This Development Plan covers approximately 177.0 acres of land, located within the city limits of Round Rock, Texas, and more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "A". 3. PURPOSE AND DESIGN 3.1 Compliance with Code requirements. The purpose of this Plan is to insure a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") that: (i) is, on the whole, equal to or superior to development that would occur under the standard ordinance requirements, (ii) is in harmony with the General Plan of the City of Round Rock, Texas, (iii) does not have an undue adverse affect upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utilities or any other matters affecting the public health, safety and welfare, (iv) is adequately provisioned by essential public facilities and services, and (v) will be developed and maintained so as to not TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 7 Development Agreement dominate, by scale or massing of structures, the immediate neighboring properties or interfere with their development or use in accordance with any existing zoning district. 3.2 Intent. The design of this Plan includes a variety of potential residential land uses including single-family residential, townhouse and condominiums. The design includes open spaces including courts, parks, linear parks, and greenbelts. The plan promotes pedestrian activity and circulation through well-designed streetscapes that provide for the safe and efficient movement of vehicular traffic and pedestrian circulation separate from the high speed arterial. 3.3 Civic Uses. Civic uses that are oriented to the general public are an important element in the Plan. The locations of these civic uses are designated on the Land Use Plan. 3.4 Open Space. Open space design is a significant part of the Plan. These serve as areas for neighborhood gatherings and as organizing elements for the neighborhood. Open space should be distributed throughout the neighborhood. In addition to addressing the recreational needs of residents, open space provides places and opportunities for interaction within the community. 3.5 Pedestrian Orientation. The Plan is to be pedestrian oriented. To accomplish this goal, the street pattern is designed to reduce vehicle travel speeds and encourage pedestrian activity. The design for various street cross sections is shown in Exhibit "II" attached hereto. 4. APPLICABILITY OF CITY ORDINANCES 4.1 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The Property shall be regulated for purposes of zoning and subdivision by this Plan. All aspects not specifically covered by this Plan shall be regulated by applicable sections of the Code. 4.2 Other Ordinances. All other Ordinances within the Code shall apply to the Property, except as clearly modified by this Plan. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 8 Development Agreement 5. DEVELOPMENT AREAS The Property will be divided into five (5) Development Areas: Development Area A: single family detached residential, Development Area B: single family attached residential, Development Area C: school site, Development Area D: daycare site and Development Area E: public and private open space, all as designated on the PUD Land Use plan, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "K". 6. PERMITTED USES AND LIMITATIONS The Property will be used and developed in accordance with the requirements as set forth in this Agreement and, if not set forth herein, by applicable sections in the Code. Specific permitted uses and limitations applicable to the separate development areas are as follows: 6.1 Development Area A - Single Family Detached Residential. The permitted uses and limitations for the Single Family (Detached) Residential Areas are detailed on Exhibit "C" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.2 Development Area B - Single Family Attached Residential - Residential Condominiums or Residential Townhouses. Single Family Attached Residential shall include either Residential Condominiums or Residential Townhouses. The permitted uses and limitations for the Single Family Attached Residential Areas are detailed on Exhibit "D" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.3 Development Area C - School Site. The permitted uses and limitations for the elementary school site are detailed on Exhibit "G" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.4 Development Area D - Day Care Site. The permitted uses and limitations for the day care site are detailed on Exhibit "G" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.5 Development Area E - Open Space. The permitted uses and limitations for all open space are detailed on Exhibit "E" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 9 Development Agreement Agreement. 7. STORM WATER DETENTION Storm water detention for the Property shall be provided in accordance with City Code. 8. ROADWAYS 8.1 Residential Streets. The street system shall consist of public streets, private alleys, and landscaped rights-of-way accommodating automobiles, public transit, bicycles, pedestrians and landscaped areas. Rear service alleys are a preferred element in the design of the neighborhood. Streets shall be laid out so as to discourage their use by through traffic. On -street parking along one or both sides of the street is the normal street condition. All streets and alleys within the Turtle Creek Village PUD, with the exception of A. W. Grimes Boulevard, shall adhere to the criteria as stated in Exhibit "H". 8.2 Innovative Design. The Director of Public Works and Fire Marshall may approve the use of roadway designs that are not listed herein. Said approval shall be considered a minor change to the Development Plan. 8.3 Blocks. Blocks shall generally be not more than one thousand (1,000) feet in length, and shall be, at minimum, bounded on either end of the axis by a local street. Block lengths exceeding this length may be approved by the Planning Director for good and sufficient reasons (example: open space frontage, curvilinear streets and/or where alleys are provided). 8.4 Traffic Calming Measures. The use of traffic calming measures intended to reduce the speed of vehicular traffic within the subdivision are permitted throughout the Turtle Creek Village PUD subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works and the Fire Marshall. 8.5 Alleys. (a) Width and Paving. Alleys, if constructed, shall have a minimum right of way width of twenty feet (20') with a concrete surface of not less than TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 10 Development Agreement sixteen feet (16') in width. All alley paving shall be done in accordance with City standards and with the approval of the Director of Public Works. Alleys shall be approximately parallel to the frontage of the street. (b) Intersecting alleys or utility easements. Where two alleys or utility easements intersect or turn at right angle, a cutoff of not less than ten feet (10') from the normal intersection of the property or easement line shall be provided along each property or easement line where practical. (c) Dead-end alleys. Dead-end alleys shall not extend more than ninety feet (90') and shall be approved by the Director of Public Works. (d) Private alleys. All alleys, if constructed, shall be designated as private alleys. All private alleys shall be shown as separate lots on all plats. All private alleys shall be conveyed to and maintained by the Homeowners Association. (e) Except as approved by the Director of Public Works, parking in alleys is prohibited. Signage shall be erected by the Owner in alleys to indicate that parking is prohibited. 8.6 Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be separated by a Planting Strip as shown on Exhibit "I". Sidewalks may be located outside the right-of-way for the purpose of saving existing trees provided (i) it is approved by the Director of Public Works and City legal counsel, and (ii) they are located in a public easement shown on the plat. 8.7 Street Trees. (a) Location. Trees shall be located along all streets (except where existing trees remain in the right-of-way) as shown on Exhibit "H". (b) Species. Street trees include suitable shade tree varieties. The following tree species are permitted: • Burr Oak • Cedar Elm • Chinese (Lacebark) Elm • Chinese Pistache • Chinquapin Oak • Live Oak • Monterey Oak • Pecan • Shumard Oak TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 11 Development Agreement • Texas Red Oak Additional tree species may be used with the approval of the City Urban Forester. Generally, no more than twenty percent (20%)of the total street trees on a single street, which is greater than four hundred feet (400') in length, shall be of one species unless approved by the City Urban Forester. (c) Planting Plan. The Owner shall submit a street tree planting plan in conjunction with the submittal of construction plans for each phase of the Property. (d) License and Maintenance Agreement. The City shall grant a license and maintenance agreement to the HOA for the installation, maintenance, replacement, upgrade and/or repair of landscape improvements constructed within any and all planting strips for the Property. Said License Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "M". 8.8 Planting Criteria. • Street trees should be kept out of (i) intersection triangles at a minimum of thirty-five feet (35') by thirty-five feet (35') from the face of the curb, and (ii) alley/street intersection triangles at a minimum of twenty-five feet (25') by twenty-five feet (25'), as measured from the center of the intersection. A sketch reflecting these specifications is attached hereto as Exhibit "I". • Street trees shall be planted to avoid interference with street lights, signage and other fixtures. • Planting shall remain at least five feet (5') from edge of driveways. • Spacing should be small trees, twenty feet (20'); medium trees, thirty feet (30'); and large trees, forty feet (40'). Exact tree spacing and the separation of tree species shall both be evaluated on a site-specific basis. • Planting should be at least five feet (5') from underground utilities and twenty-five feet (25') from overhead lines. • Planting should be at least five feet (5') from fire hydrants. • Street trees and median trees shall be planted a minimum of four feet (4') from the back of the curb. • Shade trees shall be container grown with a minimum caliper size of two and a half inches (2.5"). TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 12 Development Agreement • Ornamental trees shall be container grown with a minimum caliper size of one and a half inches (1.5"). • Caliper size, height, measurement and other specifications shall be as specified in American Standards for Nursery Stock (ANSI260.1) 8.9 Median Trees. Median trees shall include shade or ornamental tree species. Medians may also contain shrubs and plant groundcover.. The following tree species are permitted Shade Trees: Ornamental Trees: Bald Cypress Cherry Laurel Burr Oak Crape Myrtle Cedar Elm Deciduous Yaupon Chinaquapin Oak Desert Willow Chinese (Lacebark) Elm Flame Leaf Sumac Chinese Pistache Mexican Buckeye Live Oak Mexican Plum Monterey Oak Mountain Laurel Pecan Redbud Shumard Oak Texas Persimmon Texas Ash Texas Pistache Texas Red Oak Vitex Whitebud Yaupon Additional species may be used with the approval of the City Urban Forester. In general, no more than twenty percent (20%) of the total median trees on a single street, which is greater than four hundred feet (400') in length, shall be of one species unless approved by the City Urban Forester. 8.10 Access Streets. Access streets may be accessed from any street type or alley other than A. W. Grimes Boulevard. A Planting Strip shall be constructed in the area between all access lanes and A. W. Grimes Boulevard. The Planting Strip shall consist of a berm with trees, shrubs, grasses and a low, penetrable fence such as wrought iron or split rail, to provide a visual and physical barrier between the access lanes and A. W. Grimes Boulevard. 8.11 A. W. Grimes Boulevard. (a) An agreement that will be mutually agreed upon between the Owner and the City regarding the construction of A. W. Grimes Boulevard shall be executed simultaneously with the adoption of this Agreement. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 13 Development Agreement (b) Pedestrian Underpass. If approved by the Director of Public Works, the Owner shall contribute to the cost of construction of a pedestrian underpass in compliance with the approved arterial roadway plans, located on A.W. Grimes Boulevard, which abuts the southern Property boundary. 8.12 Traffic Impact Analysis. A Traffic Impact Analysis ("TIA") has been approved by the City Traffic Engineer and is attached hereto as Exhibit "J". Street standards shall be designed in accordance with the TIA. 9. UTILITY LINES 9.1 Construction of Utility Lines. All utility lines that pass under a street shall be installed before the street is paved, whenever practical. All utility lines that pass under the street pavement shall be installed to a point at least three feet (3') beyond the edge of the pavement. City utility assignments shall be arranged so that utilities are not located underneath alleys except to cross perpendicularly for distribution. Subject to the approval of the electric and gas provider for the property, buried utilities may be located within the alley service drive and under public street pavement, three feet (3') inside the edge of the pavement. Electric distribution shall be provided by means of underground service within the subdivision. Overhead service to individual lots shall not be permitted. All water, wastewater and drainage utilities shall be located in the front public right-of-way. 10. STREET LIGHTS The Developer may, with City approval, incorporate alternative lighting standards designed to aesthetically enhance the Turtle Creek Village PUD as long as the following conditions are satisfied: (a) The electric utility provider for the property agrees to accept the obligation of providing the required maintenance for such lighting at no additional cost to the City. (b) All street lights provide the required level of lighting, as approved by the Director of Public Works. 11. PARKLAND DEDICATION OR DESIGNATION All land to be dedicated for use as parkland within the Turtle Creek Village PUD shall conform with the criteria set forth on Exhibit "E" attached hereto and incorporated herein. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 14 Development Agreement 12. DENSITY A maximum of seven hundred fifty (750) dwelling units may be constructed on the property, which converts to an overall gross density of 4.24 units per acre. 13. PHASING Phasing of the Turtle Creek Village PUD shall be in general accordance with the Phasing Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "L". The phasing may be amended by a revised Concept Plan approved by the City Planning and Zoning Commission. 14. NON -CONFORMING USES 14.1 Forsman Life Estate Lot. The Forsman Life Estate does not conform to the provisions of this Agreement and shall be deemed a non -conforming use. At such time that the Forsman Life Estate Lot is released to the Owner, the Owner may subdivide and develop said lot as either Single Family Detached Residential or Single Family Attached Residential in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 15. REQUIRED BUILDING MATERIALS Residential building exteriors may be finished in brick stone, cast stone, stucco, or painted cementious siding, such as "Hardiboard". Wood siding, vinyl siding, and metal siding is prohibited. 16. FENCES Fences that abut parks, green strips and alleys shall be Open Style Fences as defined in this agreement. 17. INTERPRETATION OF USE Interpretation of uses not clearly permitted or prohibited shall be made in writing by the Director of Planning. A copy of interpretations shall be provided to the Owner and the City Building Inspector. 18. TREE PRESERVATION Owner shall make every reasonable effort to either preserve or relocate the existing trees within the Turtle Creek Village PUD. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 15 Development Agreement 18.1 Tree Protection Plan. (a) Preliminary Plat. A tree survey showing all protected trees (as defined in Section 1 herein) shall be provided with the filing of each preliminary plat. The preliminary plat must demonstrate that the subdivision design will result in the reasonable protection of protected trees and significant tree clusters with a crown diameter of one hundred feet (100') or greater. The tree survey must be reviewed by the City Urban Forester. (b) Tree Protection Plan. A tree protection plan, which identifies all protected tree species located within proposed street rights-of-way together with a calculation of the total number of caliper inches of protected trees to be removed shall be provided with the filing of each preliminary plat. The tree protection plan must be approved by the City Urban Forester. The tree protection plan shall also show specific tree protection measures for protected trees within street rights-of-way and the area within ten feet (10') of said rights-of-way. (c) Tree Replacement Plan. Each preliminary plat shall include a plat note, which states that the total number of caliper inches of protected trees being removed shall be replaced. A replacement tree plan shall be provided as part of the subdivision construction plans and must be approved by the City Urban Forester. (d) Credit for Street Trees. All street trees planted by Owner shall be credited towards any Owner obligation to replace protected trees. (e) Site Plan. Application for site plan approval for uses other than single family detached homes shall be accompanied by a tree protection and replacement plan to include a survey for trees 8 inches in diameter or larger. 18.2 Street Trees. (a) Street trees and associated irrigation fronting along A. W. Grimes Boulevard shall be installed as part of the subdivision improvements along A. W. Grimes Boulevard. (b) Street trees and associated irrigation plans shall be submitted as part of the construction drawings for subdivision improvements for all streets within the PUD other than A. W. Grimes. The actual planting of street trees and associated irrigation may be permitted to be delayed until the homes are constructed on each block, provided that Owner posts a fiscal guarantee in an amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the estimated cost of such improvements. The estimate of the cost shall be approved by the City Urban Forester and shall be in the same form as required for other subdivision improvements. (c) The HOA shall be responsible for the replacement of all street trees within the Property. The HOA shall also be responsible for the maintenance and replacement of all other landscaping and associated irrigation located within center medians, with the exception of landscaping improvements constructed within the median of A. W. Grimes TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 16 Development Agreement Boulevard. With the exception of A.W. Grimes Boulevard, all landscaping within center medians shall be irrigated by an underground irrigation system with water meters in the name of the HOA. The Urban Forester shall approve the size and species for all replacement trees within public rights of way. No street trees shall be removed without the written approval of the City Urban Forester. (d) The HOA and or the individual homeowners shall be responsible for the irrigation and routine maintenance of the trees located in front of homeowners' lots that are situated within the portion of the public right-of-way between the sidewalk and the curb. The restrictive covenants, recorded for the subdivision shall clearly identify this responsibility. (e) The estimated costs of maintaining street trees, landscaping and irrigation (including the cost of water, electricity and reserve fund to replace equipment) shall be provided along with an estimate of projected monthly HOA fees required to support such maintenance and repair. (f) Street tree planting plans shall be submitted as part of the subdivision construction drawings and approved by the Urban Forester. These street plans shall also identify trees to be preserved that are identified in the tree survey. The Urban Forester shall inspect and accept all trees and irrigation installations. Street tree plans shall include all specifications of tree installation. (g) Owner shall post a bond to ensure three (3) years of maintenance of street trees and median landscaping improvements, including irrigation. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 17 Development Agreement MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 1. CHANGES TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.1 Minor Changes. Minor changes to this Agreement or the Development Plan which do not substantially change this Agreement or the Development Plan may be approved administratively, if approved in writing, by the Director of Public Works or the Director of Planning and Community Development, and the City Attorney. 1.2 Major Changes. Major changes to this Agreement or the Development Plan must be resubmitted following same procedure required by the original PUD application. 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDED The Round Rock General Plan is hereby amended to reflect the provisions of this Agreement and Development Plan. Continental Homes Of Texas, L.P. City of Round Rock, Texas (a Texas limited partnership) By: CHTEX of Texas, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) Its sole general partner By: Terry E. Mitchell Vice President By: Date: , 2001 Date:. , 2001 TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 18 Development Agreement Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres EXHIBIT A - TRACT 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 141.69 ACRES OF OUT OF THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY NO. 9, ABSTRACT 297, IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 141.69 ACRES OF LAND BEING THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 153.25 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO CARL ANTON FORSMAN, ET AL, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 128, PAGE 456 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 141.69 ACRE TRACT ALSO BEING A PORTION OF THE 151.37 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a %-inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of the following described 151.37 acre tract, being the southwest corner of Lot 11, Block A of South Creek Section One, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 66 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being in the north line of Block B of South Creek Section Seventeen, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 230 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, with the south line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said South Creek Section Seventeen, S 83°28'55" W, passing at a distance of 504.36 feet a 1/4 -inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of a called 1.50 are tract of land described in a deed to Hugh Noel as recorded in Document No. 9652164 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the northeast corner of Round Rock East, a subdivision, continuing with the south line of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said Round Rock East, passing at a distance of 1615.16 feet a'/z-inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of the said Round Rock East, being a northeast corner of a called 16.812 acre Park Site as shown on Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet D, Slide 70 of the Plat Records of WilliamsonCounty , Texas, continuing with the south line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said Park Site, a total distance of 1758.54 feet to a 5" fence corner post found for the southwest corner of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the northwest corner of the said Park Site, and being in the east line of Block A of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two; THENCE, with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said Block A, N 04°40'12" W, passing at a distance of 485.27 feet the northeast corner of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two, being the southeast corner of Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 115 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, continuing a total distance of 635.97 feet to a %-inch iron rod found for an angle point in the east line of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine; THENCE, continuing the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, the following ten (10) courses: 1. N 05°37'14" W, a distance of 303.14 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 01°53'59" W, a distance of 134.84 feet to a 60-D nail found; 3. N 01°42'46" E, a distance of 271.01 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 04°49'10" W, a distance of 297.49 feet to a'/2- inch iron rod found; 5. N 05°46'57" W, a distance of 248.36 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; Page 1 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 6. N 03°39'14" W, a distance of 184.70 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 7. N 05°05'29" W, a distance of 247.21 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 8. N 05°31'59" W, a distance of 214.93 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 9. N 05°11'44" W, a distance of 274.53 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 10. N 05°47'57" W, a distance of 48.62 feet to a '/2 -inch iron rod found, for the northeast corner of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, being a southeast corner of the remainder of a called 231.374 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Gaston Development Co. and Garland Development Co. as recorded in Volume 710, Page 700 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west Zine of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 231.374 acre tract the following five (5) courses: 1. N 04°42'21" W, a distance of 274.53 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 14°35'00" W, a distance of 68.55 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 01°12'00" W, a distance of 58.95 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 19°18'53" E, a distance of 57.66 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 5. N 30°12'00" W, a distance of 47.68 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set, for the northeast corner of the said 231.374 acre tract, being the southeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 6.591 acre tract the following four (4) courses: 1. N 36°28'50" W, a distance of 39.42 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 22°05'00" W, a distance of 34.83 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 00°40'00" E, a distance of 122.92 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 521.98 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set, for the northwest corner of said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of the said 6.591 acre tract, and being in the southeast line of a Union Pacific Railroad, (formerly known as International and Great Northern Company Railroad) 100' right-of-way as recorded in Volume 17, Page 705 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, from which a 1 -inch iron pipe with bolt found bears N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 1.65 feet; THENCE, with the northwest line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the southeast line of the said Union Pacific right-of-way, the following two (2) courses: Page 2 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 1. N 72°31'19" E, a distance of 465.41 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. a distance of 476.44 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 07°39'26", with a radius of 3564.94 feet and whose chord bears N 71°15'15" E, a distance of 476.08 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set for the northwest corner of a called 2.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to David L. Carlin and Mary C. Carlin as recorded in Document No. 9759883 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for a northeast corner of said 151.37 acre tract; THENCE, leaving the southeast line of the said Union Pacific Railroad, being the northwest line of the original 153.25 acre tract, with the boundary of the said 2.0 acre tract and said 151.37 acre tract, the following six (6) courses: 1. S 14°40'00" E, at a distance of 7.82 feet to % inch iron rod found, a total distance of 211.08 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 2. N 53°39'15" E, a distance of 67.99 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 3. N 78°14'55" E, a distance of 88.43 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 4. S 78°19'58" E, a distance of 71.77 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 5. S 64°43'52" E, a distance of 120.44 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 6. S 70°33'46" E, a distance of 56.11 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek, being the southeast corner of the said 2.0 acre tract, being a northeast corner of said 151.37 acre tract, and being in the west line of a called 42.478 acre tract of land described in a deed to Richard C. Jennings as recorded in Document No. 9558188 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said 42.478 acre tract, the following two (2) courses: 1. S 14°38'22" E, a distance of 312.87 feet to a fence post on a cattle guard; 2. S 14°36'27" E, a distance of 1460.07 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; THENCE, continuing with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of a called 1.7 acre tract of land described in a deed to J & S Group, Ltd. as recorded in Volume 2525, Page 841 and Volume 2532, Page 623 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being the west line of South Creek Section Twenty, Phase One, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet L, Slide 201 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, S 07°00'43" E a distance of 545.21 feet to a %-inch iron rod found for the southwest corner of the said South Creek Section Twenty, Phase One, being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block B of South Creek Section Seven, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet G, Slide 259 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Seven, and the west line of the said South Creek Section One, the following two (2) courses: 1. S 06° 58' 17" E, a distance of 1507.12 feet to a 1 %-inch iron pipe found for an angle point, and Page 3of5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres. FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 2. S 07° 33' 54" E, a distance of 165.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 151.37 acres of land. SAVING AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following 9.68 acre tract of land: BEGINNING at a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found, being the northwest corner of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas, and being in the southeast line of a Union Pacific Railroad, (formerly known as International and Great Northern Company Railroad) 100' right-of-way as recorded in Volume 17, Page 705 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, from which a 1 -inch iron pipe with bolt found bears N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 1.65 feet; THENCE, with the northwest line of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the southeast line of the said Union Pacific right-of-way, the following two (2) courses: 1. N 72°31'19" E, a distance of 465.41 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found; 2. a distance of 476.44 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 07°39'26", with a radius of 3564.94 feet and whose chord bears N 71°15'15" E, a distance of 476.08 feet to a 518 - inch iron rod with cap found being the northwest corner of a called 2.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to David L. Carlin and Mary C. Carlin as recorded in Document No. 9759883 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the northeast corner of the said 151.37 acre tract; THENCE, leaving the southeast line of the said Union Pacific Railroad, being the northwest line of the said 151.37 acre tract, with the boundary of the said 2.0 acre tract and the said 151.37 acre tract, S 14°40'00" E, at a distance of 7.82 feet to 1/2 inch iron rod found, a total distance of 211.08 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: THENCE leaving the said boundary of the 2.0 acre tract and the 151.37 acre tract and crossing the said 151.37 acre tract the following seven (7) courses: 1. S 66° 50' 34" W, a distance of 163.08 feet to a point, 2. S 46° 48' 11" W, a distance of 307.03 feet to a point, 3. S 63° 14' 57" W, a distance of 102.12 feet to a point, 4. S 29° 13' 49" W, a distance of 140.23 feet to a point, 5. S 43° 17' 30" W, a distance of 292.61 feet to a point, 6. S 30° 10' 55" W, a distance of 143.90 feet to a point, Page 4 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 7. S 80° 43' 01" W, a distance of 108.09 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found, on the west line of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of the remainder of a called 231.374 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Gaston Development Co. and Garland Development Co. as recorded in Volume 710, Page 700 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the southeast comer of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 6.591 acre tract the following four (4) courses: 1. N 36°28'50" W, a distance of 39.42 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 22°05'00" W, a distance of 34.83 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 00°40'00" E, a distance of 122.92 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. North, a distance of 521.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 9.68 acres of land, more or less, and CONTAINING A NET TOTAL OF 141.69 ACRES OF LAND. THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the2t' day of April, 2001 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 Page 5 of 5 J. n Strawbridg Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas r POINT OF BEGINNING I SUE RODIER 0.501 ACES VOL 2154 PL SSC Nwarm- E 122.02' 22'03'00' w I� N 30'28'30' 30.42' ttossitifte J $ 14.40'00• 211.00'MARY 00'30$4" w 103.00' 40'48'11• W 307.03' s 13'14 57' W 102.12* -pas— MIL MKM•. % 3 20'1 W 43'17'30• W 202.01' 30'1 w 1 3 ao'43'or W 108.00' 04 ig to ST. OLORWIM LOOP 151.37 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000066004 DMO L CAR111 CARLIN 2.0 AC. DDC. MOM >,OWN! MIX OWL MI AO- OIL AM .0102 d HOMER ,a ACR 640, 55.1114 ? la ,. W. lan At nor /00, SCALE : 1" = 500' ARRIL, 2001 TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS IIOaR A W61t 0601.E L WHI IMO AC. IKIL 060 ea en ,. ..L ,. vs. 46. ,i K ,• AR,.. 1.•i. Si WT. OM R ,I.. R.1 II. OWSIM, IV ORM w —0. 1.•11 Sliik PS MI 33.61 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000065504 1.7 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000066002 CR. SOUTH 0000 SEC. SVEE71 CAD. R SL 200 0000 cams CL SHEET 3 OF 3 E 1411110SA 7601E CAL f, S.. LEGEND !SO ■ MARK ON CATTLE GUARD • WOOD FENCE POST ® IRON PIPE FOUND • IRON ROD FOUND 0 IRON ROD SET 1 NAIL FOUND 1 CALCULATED POINT M t0 O O O f- 0";=! 0 d O v C-3 O 0 0 O N U S ef M C N 3 m 0 V 33.61 Acre Tract Jennings Boundary EXHIBIT A - TRACT 2 FN00-066 (A.Y.) Sept. 20, 2000. C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 A DESCRIPTION OF 33.61 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THE REMAINDER OF A 42.478 ACRE TRACT TO RICHARD C. JENNINGS AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT # 9558188 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a iron rod found on the east line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract being the northeast corner of the said tract, and being the northwest corner of South Creek Section Two, a subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 266 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas THENCE with the said east line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Two, the following three (3) courses: 1. S 02°36'29" W, 140.95 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. S 00°14'37" E, 902.66 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 3. S 01°03'27" E, passing at 29.03 feet the most northerly southwest corner of the said South Creek Section Two, being the northwest corner of South Creek Section Six, a subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 360 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, in all 93.21 feet to a iron rod with cap set at the north line of a 1.7 acre tract, to J & S Group as recorded in volume 2525, page 841 and Volume 2532, Page ddm623 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, THENCE leaving the said east line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Six, with the said north line of the 1.7 acre tract, the following five (5) courses: 1. N 88°15'15" W, 32.98 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. a distance of 159.80 feet with an arc of a curve to the right whose central angle is 07°02'24", with a radius of 1300.56 feet and whose chord bears N 84°44'03" W, a distance of 159.70 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 3. N 81°12'51" W, 275.21 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 4. a distance of 212.01 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 31 °03'02", with a radius of 391.21 feet and whose chord bears S 83°15'43" W, a distance of 209.43 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 5. S 67°44'12" W, 252.62 feet to a iron rod with cap set, at the west line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the east line of a 153.25 acre tract to Carl Anton Forsman, as recorded in Volume 128, Page 456, and Volume 208, Page 462 of the Deed Records of Williamson County Texas, THENCE with the said west line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the east line of the 153.25 acre tract the following two courses: 1. N 07°00'43" W, 143.78 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. N 14°36'27" W, 1460.07 feet to a point on a cattle guard: 3. N 14°38'22" W, 312.87 feet to a point, on the north line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the south line of a 27.61 acre tract to James J. Hoover, as recorded in volume 649, page 114 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the approximate centerline of Lake Creek, Page 1 of 2 33.61 Acre Tract Jennings Boundary FN00-066 (A.Y.) Sept. 20, 2000 C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 THENCE with the said north line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the said south line of the 27.61 acre tract, being the south line of a 1.5 acre tract to Roger A. Miller & Suzanne B. Miller, as recorded in Volume 790, Page 892, being the south line of a 23.217 acre tract to Sue Hoover, as recorded in Volume 2137, Page 218 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being the approximate centerline of Lake Creek, the following four (4) courses: 1. S 52°29'43" E, 613.25 feet to a point, 2. S 68°54'51" E, 325.04 feet to a point, 3. S 74°13'13" E, 365.00 feet to a point, 4. S 73°12'53" E, 240.68 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 33.61 acres of land more or less. THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property described herein is based upon a survey performed under my direction and supervision during September, 2000. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the 20th day of September, 2000 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 Page 2of2 John Straw: ridge Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas EXHIBIT A - TRACT 3 1.7 Acre Tract Southerly Portion of 3.416 Ac. Drainage Easement PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FN01-067 (JRS) April 20, 2001 C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 A DESCRIPTION OF 1.7 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THE 1.7 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P., AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT # 2000066002 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1.7 Acres of land situated in the P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 in Williamson County, Texas, being the remainder of a called 8.904 acre tract described in the deed of record in Volume 2532, Page 623 and in Volume 2525, Page 841, Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, SAVE AND EXCEPT all that portion of land described and platted as SOUTH CREEK SECTION TWENTY, PHASE 1, recorded in Cabinet L, Slide 201, Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS That 1, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property described herein is based upon a survey performed under my direction and supervision during September, 2000. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the 20th day of April, 2001 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 .NNNN JOHN STRAWBRIDGE •N�NN.N�N.NN ANN/ Page 1 of 1 John Strawbridge Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TRAVIS EXHIBIT B That Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., the outright owners of the certain tract of land described in Document Number 2000066004, Document Number 2000065504, and Document Number 2000066002 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas (the "Property") do hereby state that there are no lien holders of the Property. THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TRAVIS This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2001, by Terry E. Mitchell, Vice President of CHTEX of Texas, Inc., a Delaware corporation, sole general partner of Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of said partnership and corporation. Tutu CREEK VILLAGE PUD Name: Notary Public — State of Texas Page 1 Exhibit "B" EXHIBIT "C" DEVELOPMENT AREA "A" - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The development areas labeled "Single Family Detached Residential" as shown on the attached Exhibit "K" contain approximately 88 net developable acres. The development standards for the "Single Family Detached Residential" development areas shall be as follows: 1. PERMITTED USES 1.1 Residential Uses. (a) Single family residential, as defined in Section 1 of this Development Plan, shall be permitted. 1.2 Non-residential uses. (a) Conservation areas (b) Outdoor recreational/athletic facilities (c) Outdoor swimming pools (d) Parks, playgrounds and playfields (e) Streams, lakes, waterways, or their drainageways (f) Wetlands (g) Club houses and community centers (h) Trail systems 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (see lot diagram attachment for Lot 'A' and Lot 'B') 2.1 Lot Size. Lot Type 'A' Minimum lot size 4,500 SF 5,250 SF on corner lot Minimum lot width 45 ft at the building line 50 ft on corner lot TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "C" Lot Type 'B' Minimum lot size 5,500 SF 6,050 SF on a corner lot Minimum lot width 50 ft at the building line 55 ft on corner lot 2.2 Height Regulations. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35'), exclusive of Appurtenances. 2.3 Minimum Setbacks. (i) Front Yard. There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than ten feet (10') from the front property line to the closest projection of the building face not including roof overhangs, provided that dry utilities are located in a private alley or public utility easement which abuts the private alley. In the event that dry utilities are located in the front of the building, there shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than fifteen (15') from the property line to the closest projection of the building face, not including roof overhangs. There shall be a minimum of twenty foot (20') setback from the front property line to the front of a garage to allow for permitted parking in the paved surface area of the front yard for lots that do not have private alley access. (ii) Interior Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than five feet (5') from the walls of building or accessory building to the interior side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iii) Street Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than ten feet (10') from the walls of building to the street side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the street side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iv) Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the rear most wall of the dwelling unit to the back property line and five feet (5') from rearmost wall of the garage to the back of the property line. Parking is permitted within the driveway of the rear yard. If the driveway in the rear yard is located behind the garage, the garage setback shall be increased to twenty feet (20'). The driveway may be located adjacent to the garage on a concrete slab and shall have a depth of no less than twenty feet (20'). In the event that dry utilities are located within a public utility easement abutting a private alley, there shall be a rear yard setback of not less than twenty feet (20'). The tandem parking provided in the driveway shall be credited towards Owner's required number of parking spaces. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "C". 2.4 Garage Regulations. Garages may be either attached or detached and shall be accessible from a public street or private alley. 3. PARKING REQUIREMENTS The number of parking spaces for Single Family Detached Residential shall be provided in accordance with the standards set forth in Exhibit "F" to this agreement. The parking and loading requirements for all other uses shall be in accordance with the Code. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Exhibit "C" EXHIBIT "D" DEVELOPMENT AREA "B" - SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL (RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM/ RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The development areas labeled "Single Family Attached Residential" on the attached Exhibit "K", consists of approximately 22 net developable acres. The development standards for the Single Family Attached development areas shall be as follows: 1. PERMITTED USES 1.1 Residential Uses. (a) Residential Condominium, as defined in Section 1 of the Development Plan (b) Residential Townhouse, as defined in Section 1 of the Development Plan 1.2 Non- residential uses. (a) Conservation areas (b) Outdoor recreational/athletic facilities (c) Outdoor swimming pools (d) Parks, playgrounds and playfields (e) Streams, lakes, waterways, or their drainageways (f) Wetlands (g) Club houses and community centers (h) Trail systems 2. RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (see lot diagram attachment) 2.1 Lot Size and Lot Width. Minimum lot size 4,500 SF 4,950 SF on corner lot Minimum lot width 50 ft at the building line 55 ft on corner lot TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "D" . 2.2 Density. The overall density for any Residential Condominium area shall not exceed sixteen (16) units per developable acre. (The overall density for Development Area "D" shall not exceed three hundred fifty (350) units.) 2.3 Height Regulations. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35), exclusive of appurtenances. 2.4 Minimum Setbacks. (a) Front Yard. There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than ten feet (10') from the front property line to the closest projection of the building face not including roof overhangs, provided that dry utilities are located in a private alley or public utility easement which abuts the private alley. In the event that dry utilities are located in the front of the building, there shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than fifteen (15') from the property line to the closest projection of the building face, not including roof overhangs. (b) Interior Side Yard. There shall be a side yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the walls of the building to the interior side property line, not including a stoop, covered porch, covered terrace, balcony or bay. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (c) Street Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than ten feet (10') from the walls of building to the street side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the street side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (d) Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the rear most wall of the dwelling unit to the back property line and five feet (5') from rearmost wall of the garage or carport to the back of the property line. Parking is permitted within the paved surface area of the rear yard. If the driveway in the rear yard is located behind the garage, the garage setback shall be increased to twenty feet (20'). The driveway may be located adjacent to the garage on a concrete slab and shall have a depth of no less than twenty feet (20'). In the event that dry utilities are located within a public utility easement abutting a private alley, there shall be a rear yard setback of not less than twenty feet (20'). TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "D". 2.5 Spacing. Each building shall be at least fifteen feet (15') from the nearest dwelling unit. The roof overhang may extend two feet (2') into the side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. 2.6 Garage Regulations. Garages may be either attached or detached and accessible from a private alley or private interior drive. 2.7 Private Interior Drives. (a) Single Family Attached development areas may include private interior drives which shall serve the single family attached residents. Private interior drives, if any, shall be maintained by a Property Owners Association. All private interior drives shall be in compliance with all City fire and emergency regulations. Private interior drives shall provide a means for a vehicle to turn around for every one hundred fifty feet (150') in length. (b) All private interior drives shall be a minimum width of twenty-two feet (22'). 3. RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (see lot diagram attachment) 3.1 Lot Size and Lot Width. Minimum lot size 2,500 SF 2,750 SF on corner lot Minimum lot width 20 ft at the building line 25 ft on corner lot 3.2 Maximum Dwellings Per Lot. No more than one dwelling unit per lot shall be permitted. 3.3 Density. The overall density for any Residential Townhouse area shall not exceed sixteen (16) units per developable acre. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Exhibit "D" 3.4 Height Regulations. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35'), exclusive of appurtenances. 3.5 Minimum Setbacks. (i) Front Yard. There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than ten feet (10') from the front property line to the closest projection of the building face not including roof overhangs, provided that dry utilities are located in a private alley or public utility easement which abuts the private alley. In the event that dry utilities are located in the front of the building, there shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than fifteen (15') from the property line to the closest projection of the building face, not including roof overhangs. (ii) Interior Side Yard. No setback is required if a common wall is provided or five feet (5') where no common wall is provided. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the interior side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iii) Street Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than five feet (5') from the walls of building to the street side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the street side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iv) Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the rear most wall of the dwelling unit to the back property line and five feet (5') from rear most wall of the garage to the back of the property line. Parking is permitted within the driveway of the rear yard. If the driveway in the rear yard is located behind the garage, the garage setback shall be increased to twenty feet (20'). The driveway may be located adjacent to the garage on a concrete slab and shall have a depth of no less than twenty feet (20'). The tandem parking provided in the driveway shall be credited towards Owner's required number of parking spaces. 3.6 Garage/Carport Regulations. (i) Garages or carports shall be either attached or detached and accessible from a private alley. (ii) Carports, if any, shall be effectively screened from public rights -of way. 4. PARKING REQUIREMENTS The number of parking and loading spaces for Residential Condominiums and Residential Townhouse development areas shall be provided in accordance with the standards set TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 4 Exhibit "D", forth in Exhibit "F" to this agreement. The parking and loading requirements for all other uses shall be in accordance with the Code. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 5 Exhibit "D" EXHIBIT "E" DEVELOPMENT AREA "E" - OPEN SPACE CRITERIA AND STANDARDS Open Space is a tract of land provided as a general benefit for the community. The open space for Turtle Creek Village PUD, as shown on the attached Exhibit "K", comprises approximately thirty-five (35) acres, including the 100 -year flood plain. Common open space, as identified on the attached Exhibit "K", may be usable for recreational purposes or may provide visual, aesthetic and environmental amenities. 1. PERMITTED USES (a) Conservation areas (b) Outdoor recreational/athletic facilities (c) Outdoor swimming pools (d) Parks, playgrounds and playfields (e) Streams, lakes, waterways, or their drainageways (0 Wetlands (g) Club houses and community centers (h) Trail systems for pedestrian and bicycle traffic (i) Off-street parking 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2.1 Maximum height of buildings. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35'), exclusive of appurtenances. 2.2 Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size shall be thirty-five hundred (3,500) square feet, except for landscaped lots in the right-of-way, which may be smaller, as approved as a part of the final plat. 2.3 Minimum Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be forty feet (40'). 2.4 Minimum Setbacks. (i) Front Yard. Fifteen feet (15'). (ii) Side Yard. Ten feet (10'). (iii) Rear Yard. Ten feet (10'). TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "E" 2.5 Linear Park. Linear parks shall generally be a minimum of forty feet (40') in width but in no event less than twenty-five feet (25') in width. 3.. COMMON OPEN SPACE CONVEYANCE Common open space and structures thereon must be either: (i) conveyed to a public body, if said public body agrees to accept conveyance and to maintain the common open space and buildings, structures, or improvements which have been placed on it; or (ii) conveyed to a Property Owners Association or some other party responsible for maintaining common buildings, areas and land within the subdivision. The common open space shall be restricted to the uses specified on the final plat and which provide for the maintenance of the common open space in a manner which assures its long term maintenance for its intended purpose. 4. PARK LAND DEDICATION 4.1 Private Park Land. Owner will designate a minimum of 1.5 acres out of the Common Open Space, as shown on Exhibit "K", as private park land to be maintained by the Property Owners Association for the area. The private park land may contain open space improvements such as a swimming pool, amenity center and other related uses. In the event that Owner elects to change the location of the 1.5 acres to another location on the Property, which location shall be mutually agreed upon between Owner and the Director of Parks and Recreation Department, the revision shall be considered a minor change, as defined in Article III of this Agreement. 4.2 Park Land Dedication Requirements. Owner will dedicate not less than 15 acres out of the common Open Space to the City for the purpose of creating a pedestrian and bicycle trail within the Turtle Creek Village PUD. Owner will provide the City with a dedication deed for the public park land within 15 business days from the time a written request is received from the City's Director of Parks and Recreation Department. The City will maintain all dedicated public park Iand after the aforementioned conveyance by Owner. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "E" 4.3 Total Parkland Requirements. Owner shall provide a combined total acreage for private park and public park of no less than thirty-five (35) acres. 5. EASEMENTS WITHIN OPEN SPACE 5.1 Owner shall be permitted to locate a public utility easement within any area of public open space that abuts Owner's residential development. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Exhibit "E" EXHIBIT "F" PARKING REGULATIONS 1. PARKING REGULATIONS 1.1 Parking and Storage of Certain Vehicles. Automotive vehicles or trailers not bearing current license plates and state motor vehicles inspection stickers shall be parked or stored on any residential area only in completely enclosed buildings. No recreational vehicle, trailer or major recreational equipment shall be parked or stored on any lot except that it shall be enclosed in a building. No commercial vehicles larger than a standard three- quarter (3/4) ton pickup truck or standard two -axle passenger van shall be permitted to remain overnight on any Lot or to be parked on any roadway within the Property. 1.2 Single Family Detached Residential Parking Regulations. Development of any use permitted in the Single Family Detached Residential areas shall comply with Section 11.321 of the Code. 13 Residential Condominium Parking Regulations. (i) Development of any use permitted in the Residential Condominium development areas shall provide parking spaces equal to the following: a minimum of two parking spaces for up to two bedrooms and one additional space for units that contain three or more bedrooms, which shall be located either in a garage, on the driveway or in a convenient location to the building. Tandem parking spaces provided on the driveway shall be credited towards parking space requirements provided that the driveway is located directly in front of the garage of a dwelling unit and that driveway provides direct access to that dwelling unit from the garage. (ii) Residential Condominium development areas shall include garage parking for residents, which shall be accessible from private driveways or alleys. (iii) Additional parking shall also be provided for guests and visitors of residents. A minimum of five percent (5%) of the total parking spaces that are required for the condominium residences shall be provided for additional guest and visitor parking. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "F" 1.4 Residential Townhouse Parking Regulations Residential Townhouse development areas shall include covered parking (garage or carport) for residents, which shall be accessible from private alleys. Development of any use permitted on the Residential Townhouse development areas shall provide (i) a minimum of one (1) covered parking space per dwelling unit and (ii) one (1) additional parking space per dwelling unit, which may be located on the driveway behind or next to the garage or carport. Residential Townhouse units with three or more bedrooms shall provide one additional parking space at a location to be approved by the City Director of Planning. 1.5 Shared Parking. The City may approve as appropriate for two or more non-residential uses to share parking spaces. Any parking spaces that the City allows to be shared count toward the number of parking spaces each must provide. 1.6 Daycare Services and Primary Educational Facilities. Development of any use permitted for daycare and educational uses shall provide one parking space for each employee. 1.7 Open Space Parking Regulations Parking for open space uses is provided from adjacent on -street parking unless, at the Owner's option, off-street parking is provided within an open space lot. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "F" EXHIBIT "G" DAYCARE AND PRIMARY PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Any daycare or public educational facilities within the Turtle Creek Village PUD shall be in compliance with the Code. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "G" TURTLE CREEK PUD EXHIBIT "H" [See Attached Street Diagrams] Page 1 Exhibit "H" v Q) L 0 L.L. U L.L. N co a> v v Alternative Local Street a) a) U) 0 IL U LL Residential Collector Median Tree Boulevard Collector A.W. Grimes Blvd. ROW m 0) F- a) 0) Co0 A.W. Grimes Blvd. ROW Co 0 o co 0 2 0 LL IL N L 4--+ 0 .;J 0 D CO 0 E v C� E 7-17-1 U c U 2 <LL 0En u) 4)- o c )oc _co eL c Q C o U Q) U cc) Q Q)c Q 0 D o c D Q c o i o (13 C!) 0 CO^ (, I V / CL 0 0 c 0 4- 0 (J V 0 0 0 O N 0 co a O W J J CTS CD C LLQ W 122 U `oo`�)") ,� c a� C (0 XN 4.14 (a 0 c "0 -0 C N -- 0 I- L La)00 CD cu L) - X�.= tO L1 0 4) C O U 1 1 1 1 Yi ld aP!S a CO o O J C) • Q CV .0 CV cS in o 0 1 t_. 1 1 n ld aP!S s pie,pidxf s11110211011 11-1 IMF 0 Q O H 0 CO W.■� 15 OnnW,, f— C!) J p a) W O 0 y N N W 00 C • X N CD U .0 C tD— 0 Z .O U O m m �Ea c m 12 m m 0 in T = ,S CA t0 o 4.4 p R NG ii.‘°?..) U 1.74 Q) A z� ld aP!S >pegwas pJB/ apis.oua;ur s > ta. as ai ta as o $ td) ca t:k0 y .yam!y O i-� ?4 ,O .- O.ti) • ti Q ti o.C oA > 00 • o - G O O z .E 1oeg4as apis Koua;ui ,4 'fd7C!S r LL r "Arra6.4911At �aem� weR app wails poegies pie�C apis;sails ,Q1. 1111/ liPP 0) O a) 0 0 H W W • C a) 4— O C O ma @ c O U O (O0 d) �m LOT TYPE 'A' >- w J T ld °P!S pieA apis Joua;uI ,g a) N u co O O —I 0 • 162 peq;as apis Joua;ui ,g a� a) • mi a Et o O co v) cl 0 0 N-- c• a d• am.= .011 O y .= o z_E o. 10 CO af U _ 0 CCS W 1— Q W >-- w p Q 1-- w ,. cn 0 • - >1 21--- ld aP!S 7 -t. O 0 M N N O C 0)0) 0 M m o c v a Q C m 0 `m o 0 CD CD Cl1 Ea _� X;- a - LL 0 C OO p _C co 2 >oeq;as pJeA ams ;oasis .01. L J 1JJd1S NTERIOR DRIVE ALLEY OR PRIVATE to O O c 0 O m CO -- 0 o c .Q O a U O a) as N E-3 > > u' _v x '= c U U co id aP!S l9 Opp roue ui ,g E rr c_ L E 0 .5 -o c 0 10' front yard as to E u) E5 (0 a m(0 V/ o> CI) nm v a iN c O D m O U L xoeq;as p.eA 01:!s lowiS (OL OIZA ZA/Slb 133:11S STREET OR PEDESTRIAN WAY C • E < 0 ft -0 0 O _o ❑ _. 1 • t a) - o ■ v r 0 I R.O.W Street Tree 8.5' Street tree (plant in center of strip) Measured to face of curb Sidewalk Continuous planter strip Typical Planting Strip Exhibit "1" EXHIBIT J TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXHIBIT J �I,U ANCA A Engineering Company TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Milburn Hones — Turtle Creek Village Williamson County, Texas ;.:464474::::;,da1, f**:' i� +•�. ,,I ,...i f... I JAMES MICHAEL HEATH I /• 1 1 78133 33 : i,�:c�OOQ.li0tF.GISTE; ' ,.% 4 Performed for: Milburn Homes 12554 Riata Vista Circle Second Floor Austin, TX 78727 by: Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 100 East Anderson Lane Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78752 Phone (512) 821-2081 FAX (512) 821-2085 April 20, 2001 Revised June 15,2001 Engineering Company Table of Contents List of Figures List of Tables Section One: Introduction Overview Study Methodology Roadway Level of Service Section Two: Development Year - 2006 Background Traffic Trip Generation Trip Distribution Area Roadway Facilities Intersection Analysis Section Three: Review of Proposed Geometric Design Standards Roadway Traffic Volumes Literature Review Literature Review Proposed Roadway Type Section Four: Findings and Recommendations Section Five: Certification Statement References: Appendix Appendix A: Intersection Analysis Sheets Appendix B: Signal Warrant Analysis Sheets Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 1 1 4 5 7 7 7 7 7 9 15 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 37 June 15,2001 Page i List of Figures Figure 1: Local Roadway Network 2 Figure 2: Site Trip Distribution 3 Figure 3: Intersection Locations on A.W Grimes 10 Figure 4: Future Conditions At Intersection 1 11 Figure 5: Future Conditions at A.W Grimes Blvd & Logan Dr 12 Figure 6: Future Conditions At Intersection 2 13 Figure 7: Future Conditions At Intersection 3 14 Figure 8: Daily Traffic on Development Roadways 16 Figure 9: Public Circulation Plan 20 List of Tables Table 1: Land Use Summary 1 Table 2: LOS Criteria for Roadway Arterials1 5 Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections (1) 6 Table 4: LOS Criteria for Two -Way Stop Controlled Intersections (1) 6 Table 5: Site Generated Trips 8 Table 6: Year 2006 Levels of Service 9 Table 7: Community Street Width Standards 17 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15,2001 Page ii MILBURN HOME SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS June 15, 2001 Section One: Introduction Overview The Turtle Creek Village Planned Unit Development is located in southeast Williamson County, within the limits of the City of Round Rock. It is proposed as a Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), with the land uses listed in Table 1. Generally described, the site is located north of the Gattis School Road, south of Highway 79, east of Green Lawn Blvd, and west of South Creek. Access to the development will be along the proposed A.W. Grimes Blvd which will run through the site. It is anticipated that the site will be fully developed by 2006. Projected traffic volumes are based on information taken from traffic counts performed on August 15, 2000. Proposed land uses are provided in Table 1. Table 1: Land Use Summary Size Land Use 422 Dwellings Single Family Homes 273 Dwelling Units Single Family Attached Homes 250 Students Day Care Facility 800 Student Elementary Figure 1 shows the location of the Milburn Home Subdivision and the surrounding roadway network. Other than the completion of A.W Grimes Blvd, the roadway network surrounding this site is not expected to significantly change from the time of this study to the build -out completion date; therefore, the build -out year analysis will assume the existing network with modifications to include the subdivision and A.W Grimes Blvd. The trips generated by this site are distributed according to driveway accessibility as shown in Figure 2. One of the primary goals of Milburn Homes is to design a Traditional Neighborhood Development that incorporates mixed residential areas and civic areas. The Turtle Creek Village TND includes single family detached housing, single family attached housing, an elementary school, a daycare center, and public space. One of the major goals of a TND is to be pedestrian oriented. To accomplish this goal, street pattern and design is used to reduce vehicle travel speeds and encourage pedestrian activity. Streets may be smaller than in conventional development and more varied in size and form to control traffic and give character to the neighborhood. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 1 The projected traffic along the roadway segments in the development was analyzed to determine the roadway size needed to serve vehicle traffic and encourage pedestrian activity. In addition, the intersections along A.W Grimes Blvd within the subdivision were analyzed to determine operating Level of Service (LOS), and recommend improvements so that these intersections operate at an acceptable LOS. Figure 1: Local Roadway Network Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 2 Figure 2: Site Trip Distribution 111010 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 3 Study Methodology The following infottnation provides a summary of the field data and technical analysis used for this Traffic Impact Study. The methodology is based upon a thorough analysis of existing and projected site -generated traffic on area roadways. The study methodology is as follows: 1. Review the proposed land use information for this site with Milburn Homes representatives. 2. Using the Williamson County Long Range Travel Demand Model, obtain 2006 Daily traffic volumes and Peak hour traffic volume projections for the AM and PM period on A.W. Grimes Boulevard between Highway 79 and Gattis School Road. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (11 E) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, estimate site trip generation for the AM and PM Peak traffic periods for the Milburn Home Subdivision. 4. Using Aerial Photographs and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, estimate site trip generation for the development adjacent to Milburn Home Subdivision that will be using the site as access to A.W. Grimes Blvd. 5. Develop trip distribution percentage factors for the Milburn Home site based on the Williamson County Long Range Travel Demand Model and proposed site access points. 6. Distribute traffic generated by the Milburn Home site onto area roadways using the above noted trip distribution factors. 7. Analyze the four intersection access points along A.W. Grimes using the methodology found in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209, 1994 ed. (1): 8. Formulate improvement recommendations, if required, for access to the site. 9. Calculate the vehicular traffic along all the roadway segments in the site. 10. Determine the residential street type and width for each roadway segment 11. Review the proposed circulation plan to determine if the proposed roadway cross sections are adequate to serve projected traffic volumes. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 4 Roadway Level of Service The 1997 Highway Capacity Manual, (1) uses Level of Service (LOS) as the method by which the quality of traffic flow is described. LOS describes operational conditions in six levels based upon speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. These six levels are given the letters "A" through "F" and are given different descriptions and defining criteria depending on the roadway element analyzed. The roadway elements within the study area include arterial roadways, signalized intersections, and stop -controlled intersections. Table 2 presents the criteria used to identify arterial roadway LOS. Arterial LOS is based on the average travel speed in miles per hour. Arterial LOS is further subdivided based on the classification of the arterial analyzed. Thus large arterials, with higher posted speed limits, are expected to have higher speeds and the LOS criteria are defined accordingly. Table 2: LOS Criteria for Roadway Arterials1 LOS "A" represents free flow conditions. Drivers travel at desired speed and are virtually unaffected by other vehicles. With LOS "B", other vehicles in the traffic stream become noticeable. Under LOS "C", the traffic stream significantly affects a driver's behavior. LOS "D" represents high-density traffic flow where speed and maneuverability are severely restricted and poor levels of comfort and convenience are experienced. LOS "E" generally describes a traffic stream at capacity where traffic is flowing but at a very slow rate, and any additional vehicles or unusual conditions will cause the system to break down. LOS "F" depicts a breakdown state where stop and go conditions and excessive queues form. LOS criteria for traffic signals are based on the average control delay per vehicle. Control delay includes deceleration and acceleration delay, queue move -up time, and stopped delay. These criteria are shown in Table 3. Thus, if the average control delay for vehicles at an intersection is fifty five seconds or less, the intersection is defined as operating at a LOS "D" or better. Stopped delay of fifty five through eighty seconds represent LOS "E" and values greater than eighty seconds define LOS "F". Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 5 Arterial Classifcation I II III IV Range of free-flow speeds (mph) 45 to 55 35 to 45 30 to 35 25 to 35 Typical free-flow speeds (mph) 50 40 33 30 Level of Service Average Travel Speed (MPH) A 42 35 30 25 B 34 28 24 19 C 27 22 18 13 D 21 17 14 9 E 16 13 10 7 F <16 <13 <10 <7 LOS "A" represents free flow conditions. Drivers travel at desired speed and are virtually unaffected by other vehicles. With LOS "B", other vehicles in the traffic stream become noticeable. Under LOS "C", the traffic stream significantly affects a driver's behavior. LOS "D" represents high-density traffic flow where speed and maneuverability are severely restricted and poor levels of comfort and convenience are experienced. LOS "E" generally describes a traffic stream at capacity where traffic is flowing but at a very slow rate, and any additional vehicles or unusual conditions will cause the system to break down. LOS "F" depicts a breakdown state where stop and go conditions and excessive queues form. LOS criteria for traffic signals are based on the average control delay per vehicle. Control delay includes deceleration and acceleration delay, queue move -up time, and stopped delay. These criteria are shown in Table 3. Thus, if the average control delay for vehicles at an intersection is fifty five seconds or less, the intersection is defined as operating at a LOS "D" or better. Stopped delay of fifty five through eighty seconds represent LOS "E" and values greater than eighty seconds define LOS "F". Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 5 For signalized intersection operation, LOS "A" represents very low delay; most vehicles do not stop at all. With LOS "B", more vehicles stop than LOS "A", increasing the average delay. Under LOS "C", the number of vehicles stopping is significant; however, many still pass through the intersection without stopping. LOS "D" describes conditions where congestion is readily apparent with many vehicles stopping and individual cycle failures (i.e., not all vehicles waiting in the intersection queue are able to get through the intersection on the first green indication) are noticeable. LOS "E" generally describes operations with poor progression, long cycle lengths and frequent cycle failures. LOS "F" describes unacceptable operations which include many cycle failures caused by arrival flows rates exceeding intersection capacity. Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections (1) Level of Service Average Control Delay (sec./veh.) A <10 B >l0 and < 20 C >20 and < 35 D >35 and < 55 E >55 and < 80 F >80 Stop controlled intersections are analyzed in a similar manner; however, LOS is based on total delay per vehicle. The values that define LOS, shown in Table 4, are more restrictive than those for signalized intersections because it is assumed that drivers stopped at signalized intersections are able to relax while drivers waiting at stop signs must remain alert and continue to move ahead in the queue. Total delay includes both stopped delay and time spent in the queue waiting to enter the intersection. Two-way stop controlled intersections with the minor street average total delay greater than thirty seconds identifies LOS "E" or worse. Table 4• LOS Criteria for Two -Way Stop Controlled Intersections (1) Level of Service Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A <10 B >10and<15 C >15 and < 25 D >25 and < 35 E >35 and < 50 F >50 For this study, the criteria for minimum acceptable traffic conditions is Level of Service "D". Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 6 Section Two: Development Year - 2006 A technical approach for simulating future travel demand was utilized in evaluating the roadway system in and around the Milburn Home Subdivision. Information used to develop the projection of future traffic for this area is documented in the following sections of the report. Background Traffic Projected traffic volumes using the roadway system without the proposed project are commonly called background traffic volumes. For the Milburn Home Subdivision, projected background traffic along A. W Grimes is based upon the Williamson County Traffic Model. Background traffic for the adjacent subdivisions that will use the roads of the Turtle Creek Village TND is based on aerial photography and model outputs to determine land use and the ITE 's Trip Generation Manual, 6th edition (2) to determine trip generation Trip Generation Trip generation for the Milburn Home Subdivision site was calculated from information contained in ITE 's Trip Generation Manual, 6th edition (2). The number of trips generated is estimated using historical data from existing similar land uses. The trips generated for the Milburn Home Subdivision are shown in Table 5. Trip Distribution Trip distribution takes into account where vehicles using the site are going to or coming from based on the roadway network. External distribution percentages were arrived at by analyzing the projected background traffic volumes along A.W. Grimes Blvd. Internal distributions were arrived at by analyzing the physical layout of the subdivision and geometric characteristics of the roadway All future site traffic was then distributed using the determined percentages. The percentages shown in Figure 2 were applied to the site generated traffic for the year 2006. Area Roadway Facilities A.W. Grimes Blvd. The 2025 Austin Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan recommends a six lane Major Divided Arterial. The 2007 Round Rock Road Plan plans for A.W. Grimes Blvd to be initially constructed as a two lane cross section. As the build -out year coincides with the Round Rock roadway plan, the two lane cross-section is used in this analysis. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 7 Table 5: Site Generated Trips ITE CODE ITE DESCRIPTION UNITS UNADJUSTED TRIPS 24 HOUR AM PEAK PM PEAK TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT 210 Single Family Housing 421 DU 4,063 2,032 2,032 318 80 239 429 274 154 230 Residential Condominiums 273OCC.DU 1,796 899 899 141 24 117 169 113 56 520 Elementary School 800 Students 770 385 385 232 137 95 0 0 0 565 Day Care Center 250 Students 1,130 565 565 185 98 87 188 88 100 7,759 3,881 3,881 876 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 339 538 786 475 310 June 15, 2001 Page 8 Intersection Analysis This study analyzes four intersections along A.W Grimes (Figure 3): 1. A.W. Grimes & Intersection 1 2. A.W. Grimes & Logan Dr 3. A.W. Grimes & Intersection 3 4. A.W. Grimes & Intersection 4 The results of the intersection analysis are presented in Table 6. The geometry of these intersections are shown in Figures 4 through 8. The worksheets from this analysis are included in the Appendix A. The signal warrant analysis worksheets for the signalized intersections are included in Appendix B. Table 6: Year 2006 Levels of Service Intersection Type of Intersection Control Level of Service AM Peak PM Peak A.W Grimes & Intersection 1 Signalized B A A.W Grimes & Logan Dr Signalized A A A.W Grimes & Intersection 2 Unsignalized A A A.W Grimes & Intersection 3 Signalized C A All of the intersections studied operate at an acceptable Level of Service with the geometries and traffic control shown in Figures 4 through 7. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 9 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES c A B c AC LEGEND: OVERALL LOS: C AM PEAK A PM PEAK X(X)X AM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)TOTAL FIGU E / A.W. Grimes Blvd & STREET 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS C21�)1129 912 (140)60-7 7 467 40( 40 pC0(11)1A- \ 12851 ti 0(28)28 0(12)12 0(1)1 0(35)35 0C18)18 120(24)144 7 (14)91 0�` 7 0(0)0 134(27)161 S(18)106St Logan o(8)8 0(38>3°8 301(137)40 7 837 (199)1 42(9)51 17 0(35)205 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES B AE �D D x- D LEGEND B AM PEAK OVERALL LOS: C PM PEAK X(X)X AM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL F GUltE 5 A.W. Grimes Blvd & Logan St 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 46C1 p98)14 4 467 C127��9 0(4 )46 \ 0(30)3° Street O(54)54 33)33--� OC 4 43(146) 489 3 007 (234)1241 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES A A 11 A A 1 A A LEGEND OVERALL LOS: C AM PEAK A PM PEAK X(X)X AM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)TOTAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL FIGU E A.W. Grimes Blvd & STREET 2 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS 1046(205)1251 46 129)596 0(4)4 0C4--``- 0(19)19 (12)12) \f Ca 0 3 0(85)85 0(42)42 0(4)4 0(3)3 0(54)54 0(33)33 41 15(13)28 Y-. 10(9)19 Street 3 1 0(145)145 19(17)36 0(63)63 343(49)392 1007(185)1192 5(4)9 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES I' E A C LEGEND; OVERALL LOS; D AM PEAK B PM PEAK XCX)X AM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL F U a '7 A.W. Grimes Blvd & STREET 3 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS Section Three: Review of Proposed Geometric Design Standards The Public Circulation Plan provided to Alliance -Texas Engineering Comapny included the proposed residential street types and right of way allocation. This plan was reviewed to determine if the roadway widths were adequate for the type and amount of daily traffic on each roadway segment. The review of the development plan included the following. 1. Determine the twenty four (24) hour traffic volume on all roadway segments, 2. Review literature to determine minimum roadway widths, 3. Review proposed street type widths and classifications, and 4. Recommend roadway pavement widths. Roadway Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes on each roadway segment are based on the traffic generated by the TND and the background traffic calculated in the Intersection Analysis Section of the report. For this analysis, the 24 hour volume was used as the primary criteria to determine roadway classification and roadway width. The AM & PM peak period volumes were examined to ensure adequate roadway capacity during peak periods. Roadway size is typically based on functional classification and traffic volumes. Local residential roads primarily serve two major functions: providing access and conveying traffic. In designing roadways for these two functions, pavement widths have generally been over designed as a means to efficiently move vehicles. Unfortunately, high speeds and high traffic volumes often occur as a result. The high speeds and volumes typically run contrary to what residents along the roads desire. Roadway widths in Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TNDs) tend to be narrower than in typical developments with the goal of reducing travel speeds and traffic volumes. As a result, pedestrian activity is encouraged. Site traffic was distributed over the roadway network based on the site layout. In addition to site traffic, traffic from adjacent subdivisions may use the roads in The Lake Creek TND as a means to get to A.W. Grimes Boulevard. The two roads in the TND that will connect to the adjacent subdivisions are Willow Dr and Logan Drive. In addition to site traffic, it is anticipated that approximately 2,500 vehicles per day will use Willow Drive as a cut through route to A.W. Grimes Blvd. Additionally, approximately 4,700 vehicles per day will use Logan Drive to access A.W Grimes Boulevard. The traffic volumes on most of the roadway segments in the TND are shown in Figure 8. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 15 Section Three: Review of Proposed Geometric Design Standards The Public Circulation Plan provided to Alliance -Texas Engineering Comapny included the proposed residential street types and right of way allocation. This plan was reviewed to determine if the roadway widths were adequate for the type and amount of daily traffic on each roadway segment. The review of the development plan included the following. 1. Determine the twenty four (24) hour traffic volume on all roadway segments, 2. Review literature to determine minimum roadway widths, 3. Review proposed street type widths and classifications, and 4. Recommend roadway pavement widths. Roadway Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes on each roadway segment are based on the traffic generated by the TND and the background traffic calculated in the Intersection Analysis Section of the report. For this analysis, the 24 hour volume was used as the primary criteria to determine roadway classification and roadway width. The AM & PM peak period volumes were examined to ensure adequate roadway capacity during peak periods. Roadway size is typically based on functional classification and traffic volumes. Local residential roads primarily serve two major functions: providing access and conveying traffic. In designing roadways for these two functions, pavement widths have generally been over designed as a means to efficiently move vehicles. Unfortunately, high speeds and high traffic volumes often occur as a result. The high speeds and volumes typically run contrary to what residents along the roads desire. Roadway widths in Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TNDs) tend to be narrower than in typical developments with the goal of reducing travel speeds and traffic volumes. As a result, pedestrian activity is encouraged. Site traffic was distributed over the roadway network based on the site layout. In addition to site traffic, traffic from adjacent subdivisions may use the roads in The Turtle Creek Village TND as a means to get to A.W. Grimes Boulevard. The two roads in the TND that will connect to the adjacent subdivisions are Willow Dr and Logan Drive. In addition to site traffic, it is anticipated that approximately 2,500 vehicles per day will use Willow Drive as a cut through route to A.W. Grimes Blvd. Additionally, approximately 4,700 vehicles per day will use Logan Drive to access A.W Grimes Boulevard. The traffic volumes on most of the roadway segments in the TND are shown in Figure 8. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 15 Figure 8: Daily Traffic on Development Roadways Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 16 Literature Review Recently many communities throughout the country have adopted reduced street width standards. A review of these standards was undertaken to determine the minimum pavement width acceptable to various communities through out the country. Residential Street widths for a number of communities are list below in Table 7. This data has been compiled from "The Congress For The New Urbanism," Transportation Task Force Initiative. As Table 7 illustrates, numerous communities have adopted street width standards of 20-21' with parking on one side and 24-28' with parking on both sides. Table 7: Community Street Width Standards State Jurisdiction Standard Arizona Phoenix 28' — Parking both sides California Santa Rosa 26' parking One Side 20' No Parking Novata 24' — Parking Both Sides Delaware Delaware DOT 21' — Parking One Side — Local St 22' parking One Side —Minor Col. Maryland Howard and Charles Co. 24' Parking Unregulated Michigan Birmingham 26' Parking Both Sides 20' Parking One Side Oregon Eugene 12' One Way Alley 16' Two Way Alley Portland 26' Parking Both Sides 20' Parking One Side Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 17 Proposed Roadway Type A proposed Public Circulation Plan was provided for review (Figure 9). A review of the circulation plan, literature review, and the 24 hour traffic on each of the road segments indicates that the roadway facilities proposed are adequately sized for the traffic projected. Below is a list of the proposed roadway types and a brief description of each. Standard Residential Collector, (65' ROW) The proposed standard residential collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, in sixty five feet (65') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. As with the alternative residential collector, the stall depth and travel lane width should be increased to eight feet (8') and twelve feet (12'), respectively. Boulevard Collector (74' ROW) The proposed Boulevard Collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, and a median of at least nine feet (9') in width, in seventy four feet (74') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parallel parking is provided on both sides of the street Alternative Residential Collector (59' ROW) The proposed alternative residential collector cross section includes thirty four feet (34') of traveled way, with onsite parallel parking, in fifty nine feet (59') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Using the information presented in Residential Streets (ULI, ASCE, NAHB 1990), we would recommend a stall depth of eight feet (8') and a travel lane width of nine feet (9') to accommodate the needs on this street. Local Street (55' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes thirty feet (30') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty five feet (55') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 18 Alternative Local Street (52' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes twenty seven feet (27') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty feet of right of way. Design speed is twenty (20) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Access Street (45' R.O.W to 58' ROW )(One -Way) The proposed Access Street cross section includes twenty feet (20') of traveled way with parallel parking, in forty feet (45'-58') of right of way. Design speed is fifteen (15) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five feet (5'). Parallel parking is allowed on one side of the street in the traveled way. It is recommended that the Access Street have parking restricted to one side of the road. Two Way Alley (20' Access Easement) The proposed Access Street cross section includes sixteen feet (16') of traveled way with parking prohibited, in twenty feet (20') of the access easement. Design speed is five (5) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five feet (5'). On street parking is prohibited in the traveled way. The traveled way should be kept clear at all times. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 19 Proposed Roadway Type A proposed Public Circulation Plan was provided for review (Figure 9). A review of the circulation plan, literature review, and the 24 hour traffic on each of the road segments indicates that the roadway facilities proposed are adequately sized for the traffic projected. Below is a list of the proposed roadway types and a brief description of each. Standard Residential Collector, (65' ROW) The proposed standard residential collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, in sixty five feet (65') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. As with the alternative residential collector, the stall depth and travel lane width should be increased to eight feet (8') and twelve feet (12'), respectively. Boulevard Collector (74' ROW) The proposed Boulevard Collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, and a median of at least nine feet (9') in width, in seventy four feet (74') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parallel parking is provided on both sides of the street Alternative Residential Collector (59' ROW) The proposed alternative residential collector cross section includes thirty four feet (34') of traveled way, with onsite parallel parking, in fifty nine feet (59') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Using the information presented in Residential Streets (ULI, ASCE, NAHB 1990), we would recommend a stall depth of seven feet (7') and a travel lane width of ten feet (10') to accommodate the needs on this street. Local Street (55' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes thirty feet (30') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty five feet (55') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 18 Alternative Local Street (52' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes twenty seven feet (27') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty feet of right of way. Design speed is twenty (20) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Access Street (45' R.O.W to 58' ROW )(One -Way) The proposed Access Street cross section includes twenty feet (20') of traveled way with parallel parking, in forty feet (45'-58') of right of way. Design speed is fifteen (15) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five feet (5'). Parallel parking is allowed on one side of the street in the traveled way. It is recommended that the Access Street have parking restricted to one side of the road. Two Way Alley (20' Access Easement) The proposed Access Street cross section includes sixteen feet (16') of traveled way with parking prohibited, in twenty feet (20') of the access easement. Design speed is five (5) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five (5'). On street parking is prohibited in the traveled way. The traveled way should be kept clear at all times. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 19 Figure 9: Public Circulation Plan Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 20 Section Four: Findings and Recommendations The proposed Turtle Creek Village TND and its interaction with the surrounding roadway network has been evaluated in this study. The five intersections along A.W. Grime have been analyzed to determine the Level of Service (LOS) and identify improvements necessary for these intersections to operate at an acceptable LOS. Additionally, the roadway segments were analyzed to determine the appropriate pavement width for each roadway segment in the development. A listing of all the improvements necessary is provided in the section below: Geometric Improvements (Year 2006) 1. Left Turn Bays recommended on A.W. Grimes Blvd at all intersections where left turns are permitted 2. All side streets on A.W. Grimes Blvd should have separate right turn bays to separate right turning vehicles from thru and left turning vehicles The following traffic control improvements are necessary for the intersections to operate at an acceptable LOS: 1. Signalize the intersection of A.W Grimes & Street 1 2. Signalize the intersection of A.W Grimes & Logan Dr. 3. Signalize the intersection of A.W Grimes & Street 5 The Circulation Plan provided to Alliance -Texas Engineering Company for review was analyzed to determine if the proposed residential street types were adequate for the developments traffic volumes. Additionally, a literature review was performed to determine the minimum pavement widths of various street types in use nationally. The analysis shows that the proposed residential street types are adequate for the traffic using these facilities. Following is a listing of the street types to be used in this development and the right of way and pavement width associated with each. • Alternative Residential Collector (59' ROW) — 34' Pavement • Standard Residential Collector, (65' ROW) — 40' Pavement • Boulevard Collector (74' ROW) - 40' Pavement • Standard Local Street (55' ROW) — 27 ' Pavement • Alternative Local Street (52' ROW) — 30 ` Pavement • Access Street (45' to 58' ROW) — 20 ` Pavement • Two Way Alley (20' ROW) — 16" Pavement Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 21 Section Five: Certification Statement I hereby certify that this report complies with applicable technical requirements of the City of Round Rock and is complete to the best of my knowledge. Alliance -Texas Engineering Company ich. el H:. th, P.E. Principal Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 22 References: 1. Highway Capacity Manual, (SR 209), Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1994. 2. Trip Generation, An Informal Report. 5th. Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C., January 1991. 3. "Synchro 5.0 ", Trafficware, 2001. 4. Austin Metropolitan Area Roadway Plan", Austin Transportation Study, December, 1994. 5. "Congress For The New Urbanism", Transportation Task Force Initiative, June 2000 6. Residential Streets, ASCE, NAHB, ULI, 1990 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 23 Appendix Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company Appendix A: Intersection Analysis Sheets Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company AM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Street 5 & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 A61 w-t-J,111•P\pa„ 1.%20,74:4 Lane Configurations ':,‘: :-- : - _ :WIMIWOPIPPRE, Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 irp40:-60,111filltitlYKIIVIPPWRMITOIRMRINIPg FIVAPRIierl "V „PPP)* _ - ,, A.', 1, iMAIL Wan Mc 4:, Nifaidigao ,,,ovai- o,,,,.„0...A ateoekA244,. b• 5 4.64 ' Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 "rwer11:Li-40241114V44111b1§§7111601.1#13Migdyanferiptirerar- ,,,,m1Wejohuiggrozonfn Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1583 1799 1583 1770 1856 1770 1853 go' &wa#g-ilIATae,ge,rr, aTJg.1u4",,,n1s.PmVZr.4,ie,k0gm, . 0Ajla*.m1 Satd. Flow (perrn) 1312 1583 1271 1583 111 1856 949 1853 ,imitifirmwmailortroffromWEINVO14,',IgArapintilwi''''''elgaTlr'' *tri :r1rPrilre i 6792:•,,, .5inT',..t.rmtvimstemetotgftoolo , JisitiP m-.1.3koft4a,agam,,,,m0.040.1m10.1,6 Alin: 1141., ,aLigta,gur,,, Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 --svaypvqmwoytfsvrfrlsirziwryritwatrmpArgpy"-wn „wi, 4*. ,,, 1,,,,,e A,.'m. aPa-Amag.,&,044R-:.,.,.. 4,- te, -,•,.4 grig.,,,,,,I,m-41 , 41-,,,m ;+.1.,,..,,,,,A, 04.Pnf,,,,„,Kgme, .:1:, .4 hW''''' k :.,.. .;:d Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 59 0 42 13 158 436 0 4 1407 0 rgitatiimegmbigumatfifolAgt,.. ,4*.4,41.4., Mit .*:4404r, lop$ ..o.,1414 .4,.',',ig -ALlaili",, gAiSt,:.: vetkam,,lariftrofiON,UNitipityOklirii.WOhl'e~",{4011-AFAIMAPOP rPOWlefrrpliNg Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 ,7,71ffatIWNISIIIIWKMNIIPAIEINIEVBIIIIEISIEV-21111fESBIEBMSEITMIEI Actuated Green, G (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 71.0 66.0 63.0 62.0 MtlittftiltallinfillinlielinillE11101111MIMILINNISIIIIMINIEN: Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.81 0.74 WelOPMEMIMPIWOHNEWORRIPAMW01413, * ingititpurfarip ,Nlier, mg., _ 0.7,..?, 9i7 0 ,,,,,,Ae , ....,£ ;44:, 5-:%,7.;,174,M(SPUC'dentaMlalgrrijMAMM,,b >jag 41 WA% dasi datelLA s 'tIV.Mak,grge.AMNIfigli.6. glige.A., .41%afl .,' '''"iliP:Wiejee1441WWW4pi, 5:,.,40=',M1016,,,,,AVOILIZMUKEVAAA 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 tin#14110:01111111111111ARIMPAlliftigal Fita.k.Libmi.104g, , sijkaatittfa 1 , MAU . ,.:,•,AffiliFMTVAIMiCitIlig.,...1m1, -„, 811m1"66444"43',641r;4041111120"4231:11,121,:r..T: 'vwrn,,,' Ife, ,114,rtort,-7, --lirmwomer-- c0.05 0.23 0.00 c0.76 3.0 3.0 0.73 0.37 0.33 0.08 0.79 0.32 0.01 1.08 lintortglini,slaowmarvartWeitliopir-am,Dromiwawkwosidiriga„Fro -4NE4,AA.,„f4.A.kmgogitmk.tffimg,Amogdmijig'ititqtgevrgkekihitlmtreWAM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.28 0.77 prpor -,- ,wcontrAlwinimapourvga,wwzipailvapitywootrownorlitrgAtkopmqn ag*.ts maR grAMO4A741,641alzMlb, , fit,AnIIIMUCP;104431.r,,AbgliOnSiriaagg 58.3 39.3 39.2 37.0 61.1 4.4 4.5 56.3 vp,-.04.x - 41;24.13,R,L;;;;;WOrtldri*,,,,IMKINMINTASSIDVOMPOOMPAPILLAIIMIPPINNFWNRMILWX ,:,,,,,X,.. -1,,„..., _ , .2iteittgaiighlaraAftliatiMmalikaikatSidAmiCATELAWItikag.imingiffm,lidArligwittgier:othudiNSE Approach Delay (s) 51.1 38.7 19.5 56.1 ' ,w'''''""L '-',4 fli. VjnfdrirfMNowwfqimaponppjl.arFgqnww notnimprompagorpmewmagmaiittprim ,,, ..,,---;e7.4,,,dhollia&fitiage' mtvArggSiebtkizaraiiii0Mi -''•a imaloaltastAiref•Mt.a.mdfliviMPANLIA. VANSBeftdrZafraul Vr4r. -7 A ZaaryZjp ek-fildirtifok Vehicle Extension (s) v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio .6!Pat.",,,,,,tfrAPVITIAIEORriummtwaw Wattratrammtvimmaglitlintailaii• Progression Factor iggrewautwom AiramMuA.V6,,KMMEM Delay (s) '1,4! A '1:Li2. Ar ArrlinlirS 4g.w. , Mat :34,, 5,1a.:a., avQLON, ragic HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 • „1, • • • mrtr,mm:wdrAarTgAgmoyoeou...msmga6.R•mm.wo.n.w.: Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.1% ICU Level of Service 111154111, 111111111111111111111111111111 tfigrargliik,-, :F hLiii - 1111.1111111111111411111" ing114 SEMI 4rAggetifi AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Street 4 & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 , • :"` • €4 Lane Configurations Nfinietill121111114,111.111111.1111111Aft, 1 411111.1111111111111111111111111:111116/1.1111111.11 Grade 0% 0% 0% Vallinwedr01114,01$4041,1*0515411011411WiriltriniiffitriPIRPF.:11,11faitilippip Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 *failiAMMINPV181Fer401/49,,WSINSWIplittiirE113:01Wpontriow-veTwompoimpowymnirmoppy ::„...,..,. 4 7 AMk'j:avalr6M.-t/agglaiveiuiog-drtoutetgl,,v„,,mktaEL6AaltSalngfhlt4ii itialaimaikkiitialligitiiiihigilla Pedestrians lig-”Tioorrotiworvorresrmrowilwwwroz,urrem"V.,MgrIVRVIlrar,r7rarMaV IPMAI, , NAMPTWIrilanfirffsig.1,MM ' ' , ' , , , , .' 'W., dM,'," •i•,'••,,.'S'.4,41,,,,'44,. • '10.44, ,,,,WWW ,v ' 4 .4 U00.: ,..,.1".two . f,,', A, wet 1;44 "4 . 0 :I.,' ii,msimii../ 4„,..4., w - ,,,,,,, -744.0 q4,LLL *,p..,L,, ,..03,:p:L ',,, ..,L.,Ap4PLAL..a: A AMON ammeltdakItEme gl..420,7'eaiLdiamikiwS AsialaNJAIlimix.ek.,. Lab- .414,,.41m-miN;:t•ixtal..tdoggibatimato Walking Speed (ft/s) 77mmORME,4000PAMPIRMalral44PRMRIPPirxeproliwarPIWNTRIT ,- rqpirlimiril,Pirromyraimnimon . . .. ,...,:-.:..1,.&i ,„„,„ ...mititimairomitik hitalitabilekatilAdalbillkiligiidagial fi --,,, otihiMagoitilgfidiliAllgAiNN.LagiNINS FR.ip_pl,v,..pf1,174pcveohilipe , .,_ - -,,..„..4....: • ,..,•.::•mov‘ ,44.,.....„... ,,,,, 0,- ::-...g p . lAammerikpkriigpg2::;2rl4,.,tivk,ir,em - J.,11,1•MORM g.,imaywhislidinimiih 'Median storage veh) 40,2 .i.,,,AWJEWINAM11118."4,L.,,,,aad, ig;:arugtoma,•,m7,a • geosmibmadifia,msziaosasumgo.,..mke, "Brifif.A rroiFg-ratrAqi,,Wtrj '.,-01.,i11-60„„,,J-A1101."1, &who L5 ig vC1, stage 1 conf vol --riakiffolarg.31111npvitrafipritlj,FRAWIPOWEINIFRIONPriegirriphiponpnaf79,902510mrmion :,....., Kkoralm.74.,AarmamgigembeetwaLitiommaddit4:41,..,iiirummudiaisightifiekoLDILmialigLgr.sa 4.1ShookokommaigibrdfA tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 • • -40,,,,, .,.. ...4,,, , ..„ .p.": $M.,,,e.Vwip-P.ft4peqglgW',Irq' ,..4 - ,,, . 4,,,,,pn, .,,,,,P.,,,,,,,,,,pft, , ,.,. - .,,1 ,,,, P4.,,,, ,,,40, ' V ' • 00 :4 ,, • W-410 -0 .4 4" • r ,,,,,,,,,,,,...• , ..i=w 4...0V4a...r; L.Ga.14W. iggitiiMatialgaittiWAWAMLLVAMPAtlidedlangiMagetfigile stals46,46, oil., abaihthatiLOULlabeith „..,,..,..„,,,w70.7 ,4, ..„?..,".... ww.,,,,,..10 ,,,,,,,.0 , .,.. ,www. R-4.• .-:, -„F.,-, • 45:4 ........ o ...,w4. 4:..,. . . , . ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, .. Tr. nol. 0-, ' 0 0-14,p1140W .. ' '0 - • tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 w.. wrareyaaamgfxgpw,waFriwgoisjyygprmgiw-p,,vwwjofprmpgppwifmgoirgirgixpAN":gilrrd.,JWamin ..,,el.,•••...m-,mkiommw...zsodd.koAig.mmm..d..Lif.a.afitmorss,tm-‘atvknmamtriwamdtgsbl,otmhkt-A.w.,.*skdAAoxfk4.amtho:awemkog,mw-wo„,i.tam cM capacity (veh/h) 75 177 487 wwwwww-mmonowapsommsmompoopememporwroproftWADvaluiroF wommuctenTiNfirmfRomPOMENWPAral kerlidigegiadilliikatent-nriMitagillegeligfilisibeadlisailakiMetensuid .,, ' -agemitiossallearegigrallgolgiabiliblial kflI' • ' • LP strappiPRI we„paom raftwilt40, .q$ 44.0foirml$11.4. „ftok,-6.9,4 Volume Left - 0 111111.431411,11 . . A4100 teileffrY4'*" ' C." ,..rvatorrf . ---q9t1491441911MPAWEIryffirentrilifrinipm, nmig pirFoirornmitzw4anwirmgmerm :_m.,,,,,,,, v1,3`,..,:: 441, lati410,204gWraLmigg,dailitimrift.ZAAtitogigvaat.auckMati,MitkAgaittEgiGhlaiglgOittraiMIUnkag,AttagiMat cSH 177 1700 1700 turfofiwee&-gozoimigowatowi-wwwwim..quivomms-mmommsomyworampowmpr impaymirs no az,....„6,..;;.,,Am ..ffirm.',147.0,011/....fikolaibit,tmliffailtiktriPxf.4aitteillblilikttigillintal.ilaidatailial.M.& kaiNif.isaitdtgl MOB Queue Length (ft) 34 0 0 riAlitlifigt-MiernaprojgrE4INKFRAFAIMP--WVir r; M. iRrinprimem*IRVEVORMWIIMMICIMOmmownwomtppte :.- ...,,,,,,,.--2i,t(M....milAMinifkaolskafMtlem,,radblawtki, .',f' 41.4408AdVdetigvniakellignagagolaggAith78110filualaiffeaMagli Lane LOS E twdmildwagowloarrommpoperammomprourolormiw immari-gran .,-immtmommemetzmilardittehagialigagmteigakialzilvanaikkaglerf- Anuitlairoad imw115.0 Approach LOS E or.rE„lopzpV.0",,, r••''.11M;a:.:;,P4lillg.2-iii-•!, Average Delay asaa *With a*, liaaaw 1.0 ortmAiTAitig diildiamftwiea ?NUM 11,%v — Sp.V.Kro4 .,14A 04: APHIF,17 Ar alga& 11 AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Logan & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 ,7,g77.70 !seat 1:I*77:;;i47,74:11:',11rZ 404 Lane Configurations \\* Yr1.041PkiAtti6444.49WPRAPvi ,i"W Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 trA.-rttiniatix-fraeoppriorgrotykrosaro$ tp-Atrimorporfr4whig4wh:- M111.1ftt...;;VIAIA,11114"Ati,AtiiAdtAi TAPe /qui'' lig00"0•000 ...,,,x15,a.,SK..‘,Aft..lia4V.&',...,,,,,el&fe:;£ 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 'VfaiWfraRF411lNjpijtg.'ptqfd'tnVailjffp,rZ;*VO10atljr Alifippripligref0;3416/4160ffifin, Satd. Flow (prot) 1777 1583 1770 1583 1770 1834 1770 1862 IliViraferraPSIVIRIVAMEtettgaii01 itliptirrilltipplif 1,ffrr "f00,0041014-5yraON-I' lytp, ,,,' .414144:44„544 -,,Admi4aVtikhreeogri.d1OW ,4-4mg1PP -4'40 44:44t, :AtIkal 4,P'.1. ,,,,,41.4i 11;; 4,42,A1•44K 1 aimaitalwei.,,,i ap,aftt k4.: 4 Aal,'st,' 2a01. Satd. Flow (perm) 1777 1583 1373 1583 127 1834 1770 1862 N.,,:*tri4.277;-,-TioripigiitfilljoropyartfitAIRpoitimAmipletr.giof matiAll 1.114101160triglitirga Pgrig„ 01.1101,4: J0.--agr.,tt01. 4L0 W11 Avigoka 4 VagH 4041f, 4'4 1044a14vb 0.,.Wr , „ ,askawn-tesk , :.44:, (Rohe 4.1-.Va&,44:4',404 , ,C=04. 44444,.: ..,4 ' .40v3eAktk-:4, Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Atillli":' ' IrtalMirlarIPARSVINIIVIWar#101617p1PitippipEltpr4DIFfreEZMIMORTOM4041ftrfillIN ..1kr.,4;04 Aid; 4:14...T-gi.,,trim-h441fig4A144,44t4W-WN:4041.1414m-4,4SM:'407, AW-,4L00404i,4mv.44-4,44:04JARef--44aA,44-4140:ibazfiltdrafiza,....A44.4=-404Nmee.A4 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 31 38 175 0 157 9 531 0 43 1229 0 .#4,4:. imiravaimumpavaglogrptizmaavtr-wfrevartaiwawrAimpilliraipro-14§.:-Mt ifistsoommirion mi,,,wawammutgve,gialwaitagam,„ait-ew„,ak,vdew,17,6-m..-0,,,,..1„,iffpkwag.,,,,,,,,,...matrwalam Ludahadattgam,,,„„,maioneuzfadanto Protected Phases 4 5 2 1 6 ''''''''''''''v'- jrAggeinji,r1:411Wrieglirt,41114wmpuivingprenf;a110,074ElpfsigiW :NotarWilifailtn ,.,4 444M14.444 4 'kal-Air .1;,‘40k OW 4 41 'Mble.1:',44.044A 1,44,44g,o,•5we, LitmrAAAVfo<46AAluhReltedOot JAW.? OAF4,:-.°AAA01**Ato, Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.4 58.6 57.6 3.0 59.6 - - m0,a,,AagiAto,...zpe0p1rCioAkvAilrawM:iv: kvitmierri', Tri-;AltrajWilip4ttletirMpUpe r4,' lki,,,04,,,iigtfe01A0 a' 0: am, ow tao,,,,,L.,,,,aiwkwg4g 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.67 0.65 0.04 0.67 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 Actuated g/C Ratio 01°"'°°'" lariffainIMAIREIPPitOtrillif*KOWOOKRIMPROMINTIVAINPIMMEROUV,WWWW4raktl,t1RWRI ,,,, ,,- -0„,aaaorlaigtaliatititiamta,i„tmateacratmatta4ANIFamoiredikammamarimmalikoatimaga:aamm ardemallatvamaliairafa Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 °"',-,s-,eLeir,,,0:00-00-41104,40,mptiregogtor''"-404,11,tvpstmA--."wwilipx-worr70'001P,m":7c-4..dyi-,:voiwyawampwayiNAT-kieamonaram s...',.:.. elr:A.:464:,;.M'djikkrfMdltktfkhllVtgle<,A4a?Adiea.tMdfftda'Ott'.A.IdiViMifgliN.fMMNiai.tiaaiMAS?Ataf.F.eMiLgArdtgt v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.29 c0.02 c0.66 1,vt, „,„4#,r.a.44-fezliamt240,4,0,11.w.A.4.16"ffilAtA61,40,. , -J.3,,,,,, h„,„,, ,,,„ ,,,, , ,,,,,,,;:tommtvfm4„,,,,,,„,,,,,j4,J,t4,01t41„.„0,,,, .131g.,,,,AKAIirtIVAAgAgAmA4,AVIMeabrrAlAsat'eXteA ,,...1 - M7,Main ,A,..,§, . tAl..o<AINNAMMR40.5041MaliikaaMidAGEeti v/c Ratio 0.10 0.14 0.74 0.58 0.07 0.44 0.54 0.98 traiv0120,4111,9PRINTANSWfriptirtra,nrer i,4 -A,,,, 4;.-1, ...,,,,, ..*,..tem4amAdwats,:amzkt.:4.1,, ,.„,640N*4-',..,..t.alwrwl gm 4-4 ffi054rii,W4h,4 0W11rWipMpma,#,„nr' i0 i1,V,4,ioi,,V,,APY Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.85 1.26 0.66 pzmw,F- , ,--,,, ,A.-- -mvp-4.1.-4.7., . -1m1.-1-1-or ar roppo "P". '91 * 1 , , FC,LIX,,04, i4M, 15',-17,0q11rA T.,4,,. --e,4404,010,4.,,„ 74, ,j, ,'4,,,,ii.,- My' 00 c,. , ,, gh,..4 NIF:1,,IMCIFINFL'Z' - ,,,,w•Al..,k, ,,,,,,,,,,,... ,,,,,' AA,. 00 ,Vi0,44WOW Aa40,:aaaae. ,Lowas,,;aagiam.00.;40 .54....,All:_a ,.agke,, r.,,,liwatiR6 Delay (s) 31.6 31.9 47.5 37.3 19.0 7.7 57.7 25.1 PliriAry?- 7d4-3,14301", , CinffailKlinfdt,WWIMPI0V1112 ,,,mfirtmswirapropirimiwairw - a z .1..m, .Ar.<44,010.40-001.00.44'"*-1,4i6'Vg0 A',, "4" -nw,101.1/00w040:ffP.4000,4440,01.140A*0 ' '-',,MiA.W4L. 4-1.0r Approach Delay (s) 31.8 42.7 7.9 2,..6?1,44team W'"''''''''"'tfMVSVarNiplir-Xltfitlypf00,Fhrlgp-rlf,M1 :, 1911,1414,,FMNRWMprinip - .,01-40* ,,,, 0,, ,A. r00,0, ,-,,„e 0 0.00 4, ,,,a,-," k., •th, '"1.6.''. 4.,A h '..,'," , 4f4vi,,,a,,i, 'a,., 4 , , ,. ,&.. ,.., P - g Mx:, ONW•baZghfiU 74244:4 "aiirgi0Awaxii, 101. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 *frOWNOMitiffirattriltArecw, 411of e .„.4.4.aa,, - 64.:AWAAtt 14. „ -aanaTary,Anktor 4atirrollwa jprw rwmprir...v -7,aa ?,0,0,-• • ',Itroimrt V.4,410 -1j1 Isle' ,X,,,,,F4-'2,00pAzioaro 4M§AL gELA4 idliatkiiteto TV Fenil atylw'012aiitgk Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.7% ICU Level of Service '''''''''MV-AltanniggrrallillgaItiORPIOrageterdrAMTVIPMPSIMINWPRIMENIIINP " • AdiaididgMakdangfiglair, '-'451§feiggziNe0WOM 4Fii.-qvang14 AM 1/17/2001 AM AL LIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Street 2 & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 7,71 ;e41 km -V r '4' • „ Lane Configurations ,,M0111111 .11411011101111, '17 SiTiliA• • Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 41111111trat,,„amatt wydolt,*--A,"* frryN-0-,rwrilu ;own i'--14 raeirare- t, • •,z, A- r ',r,r a'L'Il -1, Amirmawaa'&•.,,a,a,,,a,a,,,,a,,,i.- , air.: ,,m,a .m, m,,mada • .ffit • .', .41. .., ,.. im,..<4,1304:' ,;,a.' og•••.,•:101' 77 -0,,,11. "4" •"' . ""'" -Mg WIPPRRIPWC., .. • ,,,,'"" 7.:431,1,.•. •IiiivoMplaliMM1,7,1W-BAIRAINEVEla,-„eni4.01,1111~,1114- MarAptirli Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 rgifirelAii! agreammasEr" . 'll.:ll pr.- r -, nyr.,:gortormaglisibayomvoloweja 1111,54,1rgoigeifiramyR, giE-4,,,e.„,,,,m.,,,*.ukaa.lo,filiammogRimak4.4 ..t.galLamigaii ,'Z,aalkaitflfamima,,aaktir,AM+IalalitArm,aa-am ialmMmaaa,m,JiagaasTa-,amiakra-J, Satd. Flow (prot) 1781 1583 1779 1583 1770 1845 1770 1858 ,,,:old ',A r , ,,,,,.. . gg, fl. 4 ,.. ;,-9E - . , ...,,v ..,0 . ,, a: gw,10, . 0, 04". , , 0 ph,.-., , A AR:1 .41., ' '-1,:,- Ui5:: ,:sf w'..• A:MN 1,1ZIAM.Atthat -,i,,,,,, ko".,..t,z,,,,,A .,g, . • imue.,:m ,WA.g, ,,,m41,,,,,,`,,, .s. • .k,M, ,,,,,,, A 1,1,4,"'"griVAPPM/PWW, ' pm- ow-- -Irsironfr, : 4rill.:MILW1011,4, opip.p..1.71pir I.., 1086 1583 1265 1583 156 1845 664 1858 •,,,40,011gbffig.,,,,,MM10,, o,,,.;" • yptipatalligrAFROmurow7,,,,,,,m7,•"7";-P• ,• WeA":477.7",t,414". •''•, *..0 ,, fialON d , ;,. , ., Z . - ; k., .,; ,4, , .• , OPMSFrWAT ih,r .rne ,,y.',,b• . ',.‘:,',..., . ,,,Asp,*gr pa, /..,144444.41,N6, ' , le.---,-', . ',' , ,, sgf ..,,,,,,„- 00.,&,,,,, :I, -,, 44A4 ,- :' LW. .4.44MT-.44&?' .a4kg4.14e ,,,,azz arimaRtm„44. ..,,,40,4,0AVA,A1 *la-, ,<MilillaL; 4011,0Ma. Ofid,V,Maa&lat ,• 1 ',. ,,,,,,,-aPaweile Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 -' 0:92 0.92 1:924 0.92 1.92 - 7 Fwaramr,a-,,•,a,agamammo. wijaf.M,,,' ,..101,-.......91 re NtilenNVIntagtiellitneMbiggialtdakidgatnalligatilli::: 1011,110MIMINGISIA Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 82 96 0 124 107 33 600 0 33 1085 0 :,,,r,„it-giQ:oomoyomnjwwt,m"-smimhwn&A,=Nongitw.npmwlr--,mo.gura.p-vpwmwpmgmry4:iiwsfm,sq 1 ...,...mxtm„mAssmasiomadammkA4 uuta2 ri MIMME,Rilitto 3 ,ala•• a,„,..A3a,,gamtMl.M1Matufiamaahomata liteMeratalame 7 .., Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 , r. -'"'"•.'SitrolroMirinplawareglPMPC",02;94/1641930TEAMEgaitamogwvanyillowompri -7 ' -,„maymoss ',A,‘,,,,,...,;‘,,e;,:-74rmatommtdatteditatahmlogAtifiaraiakabAmiteinatomokaginersiimegonsosi .,. Argamliiit Actuated Green, G (s) 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 61.8 58.8 61.8 58.8 lwx*aewra.rpg"e-o5.,4ltd..1.o,0.1frme.. ... .w.. ,.,., m,bo,ae-mnPeLreo-..vier,l Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.71 0.66 0.71 0.66 7.11,14,Awkwe..apqmpp.,,,,,ARIFONWITOripipliWAIMINAMMINV,!.'., ettlip.MBIWORMINW 1 .aiM, ,,s.,,T,•a,a,,,r,alrA•ra3.3,33,&lfaalbla.If'atM,,3,,gigMttaatONlkAak,Mfdimf,,MfaqWRAIMlaNitmk/tktaatllfilgWAgalflraraiMM,,t,ldlnf::teL IR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 INJWA,017 nrmwrrgrilimertiVILV2Wimoompror-24,”Opmwstgrormivorwitrortim" Aadik„kraditif,41,:.1.,4„4.t..L.,.,,.:.-•aisigua.MitiaL. ..,..c4INA.4, v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.33 0.00 c0.58 ,,,...,66.„•*.b orymisrms' , 44.4ww govargr',, -4 *Aiavertvirievepgrompirmwouffire, Mit ,kadorialtiN Mmliall '',a,ataL,L,allifiAalit31,,,ilitildhilaLillaidl$344103411104AUCA,Maalt2 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.38 0.62 0.43 0.18 0.49 0.06 0.88 Iprooppri,,,l(wwitiwnimmvirept-opsprirowtsmor 1,11.144,101,41,5111 ,,„:: ..,......a,A,„:„...4.0,.Nadmohoisomm&a.tigam.,;,,mmlobAuttam.,L,,,,,,,.tg,eawAgA„;...;,:gef ,,,i,m,z,...ezzaltwometakt.mguu4c1.*,.•,,,.:5.4-mk.clotA Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.48 1.16 1.00 1.00 t6.,hijfejfnfrEreraifpjrragRgrilrtrtpPPI,Nffpir,OP,NMEFNWpgfiVW•RfgpepWVM ..„,•,,,,,,.....J.,;,.„ , .' • xl 30,al : :lam:, - irna AM.', .0adaliliga:VIM '•0634Ba&:dgagitao,aladat ,-adatait .i. a,QA,,,„;a,,dkalaataldg Delay (s) 36.6 35.0 41.0 35.4 21.6 10.0 4.7 21.2 ----, ...,,, ipq nmpaPPARRAPPYChefir , r• g meeneyity wyjinummoswitwornipsipmfarip, -. • AIM ;,,i;s5.4M,bangatArattOlnealdifitrAIK14.&.,421.10k 4.-0.$1.M65 "Y•MA=1, onsAk.,;,o a3amliAlkagiNkadialAtAaaaatMaLai•_ Approach Delay (s) 35.7 38.4 10.6 20.7 mr .,,,- -7,75ront&e, . ' pemanwommettrompowwfmainomemplairmer, iparwoormr - Arffliwurianium w liamltN,W,le• atallABOINAlitinialt0141141,1kftlekdissoorokarawarlaifilitlabiof ah "? WO - . imdlikueettammo Satd. Flow (perm) maima Tkriri.z,,,?f, &vie, Awl* ''''' *4: 4:044ti litriar!a: 'erigillk:;F::- Irdiggig, 24, 4 , 1/4 ,.i ,.ti.u.,,, matamarrA gq- vs* ,11 A t HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 timpaity&wort&iiih4.4.040,...40100witiolt*Atejiromw- ,-- wirak,IN.0,sguloolie :tog ,,..,.?•. ,,, ml,,,,,,tr-A-Jr;-3,7mw,ww.: v4tviA.A• ,,:;,,,A,2,..gm„,,,,,,,,44 P.eft h, ,,d L,,A., ..<'..L„, , " amalk 1.0k.m.44....,t, t I Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.0% ICU Level of Service D .t.K•., ..4.47.574 0.17 4 4,7iM.,<K, z,,,.,•,•;wi , .,,..P argatargammaWlfetwimmumlell' lill-TiFflr4r, fr r1.- Ix 0" ,,gi nital sidmilabeggisagiffeilibibiember Po leaeiteuriteetailieeer watt ...titat* .4e,n6.• fri AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 PM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Street 5 & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 77*, Lane Configurations ,1:i....1:1!:.:,i!!:.i.Y .:•ii:::.]E!1',' .'.: '''''7 ' ' "" W:.-4 ,..• Obe.',4A,04#41VeZ 4,44„ ,,,,4 , 44 4,,A -,W ala sa,i404: , :,,„.4,4 .A., -: ..,,.,,,m?,ik4.i,:mc.,,,Aa ,a,,, AV ...,,,w Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 ' 4.0 4.0 "tromp, 1p.rearowypmprowfittwomp„0,41,ANARgliganlat - 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 L.7.rmz,;.1,,,,,mak.„,w0,4k odsii.,4.,..t 1dt ,o- W...,"At,.. z,,,,,10441.444M601,,,,,,MMUMM:i7c. • 4 a ga:',Maa4a. ,, '7%7. ''',. regt ardigann Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PlarS1011111111111111111MEINI 31111101111M101111,01111111111MINC, IAN Satd. Flow (prot) 1779 1583 1800 1583 1770 1855 1770 1854 .71101111111111111111111714:3111MBEILZMITIONMEINIESSIIMES11111 Satd. Flow (perm) 1336 1583 1426 1583 588 1855 117 1854 .iikr"--litioterrillatilriworiownwomtprograstprryiswftwg‘morprmopttammigd ix:%',-,i, mt ;;:io 1- "' "" 4- - v"" .""0- "' . -'11" Mr'" ,",r ' ''.i -r- '' `-'''''" 4.'-' '144Frtr' • • ' P"'l 'r " 1r g--*,- " of."471 V '''' 4, ,,,,, ' 4,4' ,;twaaka,•150kgaaamaLko,IA,,,S,,,, 4' ' OM ',44,4,44,ad,g4,4M444 - 4' 41-•gam.am': LA: A....0,,Ar :i its:: ' 0‘,.f.:,, Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 '''Tr'EnTftlr9APPTI",t1,4:;erio,Y4,igIPF,UrrfPeWVWNTdric:S::4'klsMfiVjPPPVWAPA1W,vimO ,,,..: ,,,,-, :::,t,',.., , 4.'"ool halt.446 ,,U 'j".4,,,,4&ilM$1,v'gkIMAMMULOMMadd.,‘Mg*T4L,4,'Wth:OWOA.AnfritrAtartMOMMAINIM-AdtAteiUMM Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 49 36 0 30 8 68 1335 0 13 669 0 ir:0644tgaltalar :".t.-,'''''''IONIMINTWINNWINEW: ,146011#4,11,101,11ilignie44,0061W11, .,,.. ,.,,, ogrou fti .;,....ka'a, !u, loki.asam:,,,,.. Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Niffreft' pftworABRIP 41,011114010PintrerNarliatlifWV:' WITIMPREINWPWANWSPIIIINP ,AU.1,,.., .-..;.,,,a„4:A., ,,,a,s, ,.. ilaaf J. „' ;' '.e,,akih: if.P4,: abikAaa4.16,,itta2F&AW diraJal: g" 4 Ata. 01.,:igagata:aaiaUgaatadfdaha&-,4 4 :,'0 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 71.5 66.4 63.7 62.5 .--•'.7.a.gra.-,,,o-riptafilayriomporamairmpiwpropeqprAmisontawdwvwormozopjorigtammair . 1.Wikmeih-nuatt,AggigtimbAkddirLifiblinikaktairiMiatiMAINIMMIST07251•Mildeaahvaaa WI Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.82 0.75 0.73 0.71 74104*610670711WMIROMPHIgrillagWitiqinfillrepliVal iliffalrfaVtanlipflrgaill, itiMilaitfiltfenttliMitrialalailitainkagnerittrausafire.74'.:-.114monni, i•„.. ,„„,,i na,g,,..4,,,,,d- :,-,,,,M.:ateir.aokt, Obv... 1, awa,.:tiga..MANtifita.k,d, ge,a .. w.Llikw...a.a.aw.0.0sfica we ,,,o a...4ga, 57w.b,..;44,, Iv Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 q#11: ::„..„,„=,,,a,.:4:mi.,..ravpin,...0,-,,fzuwaggsamefromuvembhnntarawn-ezeme,gim,,,orgo,„,,,,04,A.magrariapat-ft,,,.,... -ragokcat. vis Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.72 0.00 0.36 FriMMIIMI,,• 411,1,111151PardEptalralipplaMplerg., OM, ti, f'df,”5.0,41414,01111011,VT,IF,I.o 1.., .0,-Vit7Ka.,,',10WAL VabLVM6,,k,MzdamAMIUML,.:Z.,,MMARCI:AIMOMM2,4:k%W.kr4,4145WAA.LOVA% diAa,LiA*1 ,4...ki,a; WaN.ORAAta 4 Rag z _ v/c Ratio 0.39 0.24 0.23 0.05 0.12 0.96 0.10 0.51 VOiNirity'rrAWOWFPURTPJMNNISMPPAWfrffiliMPWSIFIVATaigifijVL Alrig,"; IMMTPlip" .: F '„ ,-,2a% waft :r :A? *, !,,m.o.Nalat Ad*. RUM Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.77 riiijirtiffirriMiltiPOPMFOretWIRIWPSONAIRROVIPM,I,pgroggipmpsmix#0,saprm Delay (s) 40.4 38,7 38.7 37.3 3.1 26.6 18.3 6.0 trwitorpaforiprominepplowirowitoratmligewspitormsiamognmmlim, Ifitawwwmaywn ,w.A„ft.„litmrszA,„,,,JadmattonAdoodalimacearg,:mbmenktomkgreakammaggigiokbikaam, Atommistessw,malog Approach Delay (s) 39.7 38.4 25.5 6.2 011011,1,„,,,orkiebakohifigunsalitquati a Jak..:,,,§ mazaamosategivabil --wouttagisa davagitalminuhat ET iii -3.--. -wommaroyampanwrirm-fRoplyrenewitommummer, glik.,,,WW.Biatjgg 0,,,,mmunirrownivell :441"10m1.- IZALLUZitlia4 W2takiRifin • „Ale • ,. ,AVOIONPLALIO' 111111111.,A11111. ,,L-1.*:111.:IVSA. '1,11111111111gm iiillitillitil HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 ,---,,,,,,,,v, ,R7 R. mtunrropvgammpromwowyrniror ' - f. MN" WANAMpf PAWMPTAWirol 7,4 ., -:,..fiagillartAlt sumemomstwomx..-.L ,ff, „„„,„„ , Aiaufseolham,„„,astia.dittarowhak:„ Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.2% ICU Level of Service D '....7:,.Cntffitt:KfMrltIIIIIIIIIIBIVEPNISIPjP'Iklfn/IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDBIBBIEIILIII PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 t HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Street 4 & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 w„fo Litteg"4.'" • ' ' 611114'4 )':17$ Lane Configurations ......„.. Grade 0% 0% 0% 4.1", rieliVARriffetanWilL;411111.0,111.41:14,PP,...3,1,140.41„4,4v vigiFirogyripomeMPAgirerro,„:0110,1, paw . N10-14 Lw40,?.vtg., t,'0,1.010 wir).- '44"P",mu'A.T.". Pt.loW4 .?,,O0P1 g0',0,0004,,,M00.0.0,,..00.m0la,1,0001,40,0 0,0,00 „ z.,40 ,4 .40-0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 'rw'm ''''1711,111,AltringWINSPIP,1144#11TWIWaptlertjpg 4iVe4WW;11116,413111RVERAWANTIM --,4404,00.004p ,004.3001b0010 fiX,4.,Ar"V.,"e44.4.0i 4.04;,40, kgA row Pedestrians 00M00,00 - ,0:0,, ,,,.., r„,,,,,,p4m,vmmoigrraktrwoRtroponot RoormoornionimmeMpATM,Apilltilpilli AnlitiVeiShiediegae,,d1Vitiedthir 4.a.timedititWistamomAtiudgg,4,k44.,mms-,,,agb,.4gfaam.,„.,. ,,, . „I.:a..., Walking Speed (ft/s) ,,,,,,,,,,,v,w,,,,opiwwwwmpeogrsommotommvpoymmirx,wo,Rmarm,mourtaripp4nroomq riermrpor,ormspmpuro ,„ I • • : p; . iwv,y,w-4,43;,Aw.,,,,,..,,,:,m,.,„,,o,.„,..,,,p,,144., ,,,,40, .og,,,,,,,..„00„.4, ,,,h,„:.,„..e„,„4,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,0 ,,,,:. „„„, „,,,v2, 1 ,, ,, ,I..„,,,,,,ov,„„,,,,z,:,,,w ,00; .00:.,,s,,,,,',,,,00, 0 ,,,,pa,,,miamet„„,gmeakriebaNammak :Amnia dalffilidoRidmagelMaa4mpAhmaafiL ,111AridWageminthutmomilibm Right turn flare (veh) "v'''—oworgtmarelmtwisiewiewaymporragrentrilifFIRMWMPWRInwpaplegralanillirogglipmmemc, NfigammtAta.4.110,4fiNtagnianlia'AtiSWANAfgal.galdWidIMMIAIL, johMS;014 Median storage veh) .000'w.0,:wigtwwwrat0.4gapta..70,EfferMaintM As „, OIL _ ,0 4,,,, , g I Ar VappirgiO 1 ..,,; : ° 01,,, , fip, ,,,w IV Pelp Fria 4..2111, Tel TAN " ...z,,,ksm ft. rtgatTPLWVARAMTAINIMMUSGIMAMION610 VIM it A OBT, '. L4 ii at esJ ,.a 4 U a; vC1, stage 1 conf vol --„,,,,,,,,,,,,ww,:ivrerargnmwmpuotromwarewymmemitogrommmwmerjAregmg- mrrmaporApsyqvimpArvanw 4 „.k,,,, i..:., aagArarMIAM.rfamomagabolatmago011.:MIRRiam.fiwgdmatankgaNd4alw 'wmomt,,wagOt. "4 Amar,..:: eat,-,:., :6W :OVA M,S0,0T,M11 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 AL ,rjr,,,,,x,,,,,,rwromtwor„,rmorevolvr.r.249,wirv111om*Imum:9:rouvrirrrogiraymmTimprolorcommommgam ,,,,„k„,„„„„„„„„...,„„, ..,*,,,I, , ,::.. . 'r.,,:,:Miringtgaidgetekbdifike.PLADMAraill.41N1A,44WARMAthadagl;attitgraktmaggdahikalfola ::4331mahOlarboomiffam tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Novirailowqranumerwoympireeraromplonyetnaragoomproyoufwwwprooluggnmerm atMifsDagsg„,m:kmw:sa,R4,t.mbwksakgv.„,g,sgog:Wtkl cM capacity (veh/h) 66 468 921 1am.,:.4.1.,:.; aproo,,www,mmonfammvomv„:„u ,,,,.,,,goloimIluomfw,Rmwormemportmgorgvoymommyommgror,,inrizvmpHom rgion000li-t*Tyoetrego,,,,4,„*.,"...A.,14.,.,7,,..,,,.,,v,„1..,,,,Ip„,,,„‹,,,,A,,,,,,,,,,,d,,,,,,,,,,,, ._... ,.„..,..„Ags2000. A'`W1.408N, .W:0 '4,00aV00L0A,,t00,1,d;1040,..angariam:V.WAII.40 , .0., ,A40,4,digW0,000M,54,1k*E0MOSTMag.A,,Lra, awrw- "At .,,`"'"‘t&AtIFIRSALOPARbrin- , :31Eut 1,4,41,,,somicomitio - IMINIMRORKEIWOROPOSINIKifilt 401.4<liainiediti4gfwMaial, mtv 4:4ma-M.495;MoSLomatoi,..444'&,a Volume Left 0 -7-monommlimommouromplimpromp,,,,w,4. cSH 468 1700 1700 0,41144wwk,.,,,r . whiamiatMidhig,:;fidlakta:&..f m,f,oawth'imgartu,,Amgmegwkama'areAgtidka:::a,;;::;;:;;'; vp',..mromm - Queue Length (ft) 6 0 0 s,:0,k.07, „3„44 , , r „„ Verett+1,0100$,L40, 011%:10. ''''"'''''-'1,tr'''''"r0'7APLISIMMWAWORMErititAWarAMMUOMPWAMMEMPEROIWOrnr,f074n. ign.11.00.04.F.V4..• .,t1 --A r 'FA "' -417 "v"I"L'VP"'" '1 • • r'-rAA; Lane LOS ;4s.weaftti*f#14044,40:*,.i4,00,01*40,044,1hP0040004140444-19.1r4014-04,r110111406016-t!tg ,5104fOlvigoalr'"' morma — melnimor parmoimmigi ; 4..P. ',01digh1,0., A010 0,20060.6.. :1044%,(00, 1110,0,414O 0,0,00,01#0, U0.11 Approach LOS Pito trir Average Delay „„„ kANME0111111 0.2 Nam 0.0nKatt&e.1 "A, • ' 1.4 ' '044.0404t 770,Ptit% rw,,ZWO5911181,M,F Ara.,wara Alike OFOR-4, B.S.Augg PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Logan St & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 Lane Configurations r . , . , , t , ' , .1+1,1W: • ' 'NW ' V''''' :.3:::.:1:a: Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 74 0 , 4.0 4.0 4.0 l'-- -- ''''''''''',1•111,10101111przili " tipprop4: ---mittita, riliA A 4,44AALMAWAKAMIA AfAraJtA,ALIAIAILIIii 4%,,iMIVire, .„ ,. lit likiii. • A ..1j; Aqieli...,w,iAttifiAM ' -.-"Trifirelle" ;wpm 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 -,,Awmgvmforpjfifiolpimp'gljrf,twyowhttnEqiapzw,mpEppqiqtsptvppwppgmnn ,,,,, ,,,,,4..b.A... kr.44.iad MikiwM.,..g.,01.0kMrelgt..11wavik•-za,imoghlmra AfingrAmam Jemmf am ArtgbAgutr.thudidtmmia ve-,..4hdt Satd. Flow (prot) 1780 1583 1770 1583 1770 1817 1770 1858 '','M,It"iprofflitf4WMPIRMWRIEVIONITArtitdomplrporMfdegrorimigrinylpPIMMITIONOMpi 041k4 .1 Ag.' t.,..,,A,i;ArtiegMANALANIfildaLLA:A4616L ,AIRRAAA.kentketaAAVAAAAZAAAAM.A.o.LAMANISIAAAAAOAdara,AAPA Satd. Flow (perm) 1363 1583 1394 1583 641 1817 117 1858 ---pr,r.7,,mvmmesmagnomm"gmfozpow ,, pionth,:wor:IimatoptAt "alpritmerw-Apsivantwr: Tormivelmv ,,,,,y,,,,A,,, ,AttiMEIRIbalif Modatf 44 dualzafintak ,;4.,'ANgitlf-: a owalimmai4VA.fikutt,mkamsrditachtmsgra .4.4migememoott;,,, Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 if4111W?”01,1111,11frignipfltrEWW.1,111112,631WMANIIENWINIMONOUREWir 'JO C,....T.A. a A .-,..4A. 2A,LUA„L irtAkAmmaim 6:1ALAAA,Adif,AAA.A4.4 • ' OMIA StA,,,1440,4161A.s, A: AM:..g. AAAIIAAA:iA.A OL .A.Mta -.AM Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 14 20 0 115 99 41 1350 0 164 672 0 WeitliiIIPZ,11001FORP011is ATA illtte,cfejert,litytiornilf,opr 011•11461-014,,oi ,irglital&RAIU Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 r <,-pm,,,,*=rag„=0:7.5,1nowrgypouminnmirompaliwymprovinwroimpowamiwilsippiwinnipwwwwpme i,. aflatiawYtmoUitatitakila&gatemifit olorMagbaliktit,,MarafaiMatrAdetilftlaminkiikkgiddifitAragikeitallastel Actuated Green, G (s) 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 63.5 60.5 67.5 62.5 G ::'..0,' *iittrimmilmeltaitaiagfitawalkinvilifflasegAggettatimmeikemeoziemmidsraidukommtvgalimithtielka *#,.."..flivike-4.1.waowimeimmimagnairspywrammortipowslyNlyt.tmptmmimparepwatimpsnAvogewrord Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.73 0.68 0.77 0.71 elpifiliA777 irgalinfprapptilrytimmoirgoormittromworavalmminipmpporAppyjnirm, 0, 4,,.,..,,&,„,',.g.,fto „, ,,,,A„,,,,AttadateoitimisAJEMiamildrodmimbooriAgfisittc,LAmid„Aikkonfitaitoks..g,,,,guagemeam Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 eti 'laktalt;MM)TR,figgAliptnii`Wtelgaraintar"..4eWen. tO . 0.' g' , digrWitALOKAWMPIROKUNI :ttiifgAt„kk,LAILNV,'AMWgAAIAlftA,v,.,,°AMIWASKPr,,k1. , YAREA&P, gf ALA. - ,; A. LilltEAMMAJANOAMARIPASN 0.00 c0.74 c0.05 0.36 "v -..afk7. 1511WirliffatelnIMINIONWWWOrrart ,- .rWMA,1M'itlpjaN.PpNE/g: INUPPWatilarninlOR 6AANNMffAarnItAtEAA#VAA/A31:1AAMAAA,AALLINAmaitikrlimmIAMITMILIOAAAALIMATA laglakAAAVVANAOAAMAGAgil v/c Ratio 0.09 0.11 0.71 0.54 0.08 1.09 0.82 0.51 ukywsmagorwrrwrrr-r--wrgwg: wiRcprem,,,,,v, kiozweimimpAsumfmarglhw 7," dEVAP ..,,,, ,,,,,,,,M6,61PAAVIAMOMRA ZiWIL.:Wiadb,WMtgRealda 10 . MrAaz'igi5,n4g-gVrahlezmgikfmvMwMoulfft.'oMt,?mgiwg.,,A14Mgngdgg Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.72 1,00 1.00 Wit*iii*VArgigiirliffagirpli,rliwit-r4,0A,v4,14,4,,,,,,,,L .• „ .. „- jdpi,p5,..00,' • girep4PPFNIV ....A.A,...A.AA„,..A.4,,•..JAA IfiAgA tAISCA,111AMLAz d,,,1 :math .fihkg.„ zalkom, .4 .LA41, atMaVA, e VSr:' ,W , A':%,1,.4, 4. Ate a a Lk!' ,..at 0."4,4* a Delay (s) 35.7 35.8 51.3 40.4 4.7 57.3 65.1 7.5 fIsaiiiiirAMWeglawrypitrily.",r9-7151114pre,w.,4. 11,11,1,,r4Mtr,, .Pli-RIPX-5-91"Mianypw-riqfmmeAcsrx o47,1,,,mr.,,ar,m, ,,,,,,vanotAwayat..-aniviv -„.. usitovAdap-. ;10b11,,,.. 64,421A0kAigiNfe ....AtitAAANNAA A 1 AVIAAAkAbligl Approach Delay (s) 35.8 16.2,,adar , , , . ,5,.,.8 18.8 ,14;1pw,,o'...,..-1-wir,e,,a0A:1PatirMAFIRPAPPOP, 54,''ATA.p'A-,,' V: f,,,;-;:fi gi •' -1,,,pfo'"'"'"VO flgtaiMegir V'''' --.0.011"' ,,,,,,,,,,,, ..,,,m,....-..ablig. thom,:ai • A4A4m41,4w&,;0.a.awalgat34,:....K.4444 . ,..,' '.i 4,..Att,SL,,,A.0.1:;416,11:44.KAA ' _ „. 11" ppti nil 7,,tig v/s Ratio Prot 01,14;41:040,11, '45;V,AlifianeRV , Itefitoop,4 PniVIPINMInprite h „AMMO& Aga HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.07 o cjiimmaymojefitErisron„--„mplawergra4wowalloarwpgiorpsmatawAymnovorphiser; wn° raN,9-,"„; --",,,m,u,Arme,,m,;:mtiumarvida,tsLogalL,mirdlamgavreAmmirm„.wri',,mqmitcmagmtrmArTg,Airawigtfog,i.,,,s 74r-IplowpwentrigrexplapieR: Tormar:vommairmsimitimotrar, Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.0% ICU Level of Service 'aoisigforf a, & LANAttzliikw AgA1INILI4h4, &oar ,11obtat-Atia4Na411011.0411;41a4 tidAelkAif 204 PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Street 2 & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 Lane Configurations ''OTOWIaliltraWahlf -- Riattlitaiti ' .:, Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.11* k:ChMi' VISUMMREINANinfiffitalikkaliKKINOWfiaatAMOM.4..bitauft -; ALgmlingitiMigifinAgrataMiffiaM, wiNglifie ,81-,7414-44-09zwastapp:tiampoweinswww"Rogamo "114 Vi ErtitereVMOSIONNAMWMarfairrWIRi Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 -Y-w-rimiewrommympoltmethwrimrANfrmatmpirdiparirmatawilf-Aritmitmpagg.,,A1-41dh% -9,*31 .. ib'.41.MriMMALIdaftkodria.N,MSIMU.. matmsar :,.4da Abomt,„„aatfimmalmtotGagram,,,,wmfatiosas.,,,,imoz.gmTAG4L.scum Satd. Flow (prot) 1780 1583 1781 1583 1770 1825 1770 1834 mvsfo 4,wr -ftmttotrfmrovt;tpit#:ivauthirtlrakrmnrde-*gtaFotttymvi;T*,qwwotFs.fwwittmtmttmt ...., ,,,,tt.., t ,,,,,,,zettmogibtaststmi.stmamitatfimadatotirtdsomfitorommeeitit: rb,4,4,:maiWrMit4Aft ' MaMMAIMIUMMmidittriM Satd. Flow (perm) 1296 1583 1327 1583 584 1825 164 1834 -twgrirAggisompirmtlipinViortrirtwto.momowtommitri A mysitmwtripargowsom =i,.0..,,.!LIVAlfroMmaulacW40..4010.,..twa-gOkairntiAftmAff W.E.MAntONIMOMM:thiff-PA hbOAMAISIMM.W4211721,101104:VISMOMMAINW Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Nfjrra",irfpNi-RENOft'NVFpnpetWratfaAsyostmprgmymtcgmwfftvst.vggfmjgr - -7,-;::-0Agta.:' tam :;:t.,• It dt:„,,,t:',,i, idIANINiNfilaalk,gAz'AitAL, MMAA,AIVia4131ailibbaf,Rabei3VACOMLAWAmmdffiVaCAMA.416,,,,,iddifig'MZJABIAM, Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 63 0 85 107 118 1108 0 102 669 0 VrMtfIIIMVRRMPPNtYgibVNgfgeVtjiytlf-AWfifjllSA)VtfFkov,Pnwii”pwvprwl AVAAN'Apmenosmim 04110.60.,AdanarthiStekhKaimmilim0.4111211....:,k,,miraii‘aLaoneastr(ASIkait -itlibtxmaditelagiultditgla Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 "Niffit.friWargnflingitriMprOMBINATOFINVIMIERNI,MOROIMPRRIIIMOKIWWWISIVREN At;tt-t.:t.ttArt.,.tt.,ttmggttttmtmmtduittdmtaf,utaatt atta-artamouttottt,amatottammaattirtamtutsb ....m&Saor lagna,c;, Actuated Green, G (s) 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 66.1 61.1 64.1 60.1 -----rwwwwwjamotoompowir prowirmimmfileriftw."-r frigrprittinny '' 4N-19gfirinflitraR ArttxAtammkaeltht4.4;motA.;,ttatsitagrattuokttonatplogro . Atka. AgagAai%44, :.kavAx& Aggekg . :09,,,,...,,,,ZAviaag ,''. AtIgAttibil Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.75 0.68 0.73 0.67 "' '''"wrIteriffitlifitlIMEMpfinvirsitiperlopprIttaiwitriporiwzrommtprogrourstespurign k...A........:,,,,,,,,,t,,,Lta ,a,..,,,ractiosmtWtoglamEW,age,1114,AaawIliwkiks IL...AIL. liwigitiria.& tilign;,,LOZaassitgL;k,,,,,;00:6.„AqualrAM Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ''"" • '' ph r1-iZARmarrigrog-'rldr,FIRTP17;91 VijnirlfereittFIPMEMpWniraffWAVoin ....J.:, .....f. ,w6.., , •: :,kAatkan:: WaiAlf.torgiafteitmtm4,tlaMmgAg. mgi ut ..., Am„,,,.uwgweghv vis Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.61 c0.03 0.36 kril 0111W1211111111111111MIESNIIIIIIIIIIIISTANOME.111111111111111111.1111111711111111111 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.30 0.49 0.52 0.23 0.89 0.49 0.54 INNIA.11141111111111111111111MIMEN1111.911111111111111310.111111111111111L111,111111111 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ''''10.7 gwrifroimitiwriefittorminfi rirovonnowr,;:grr r -Tmogorpionwpmenotrew ovr; ppm" ,,„; _ WA :AA.A,WAA AA AdAAAA,A A.S.A...' .An>f AtAAAAAA '' dtiMAIMMabrAiri5 ' ,q&ainumt4.0.fiamsimr.1..40Am*..:,:a6;%? ',..,t : ....1A,..,AaraMilba...ealgagmbiliena Delay (s) 36.4 36.6 38.9 39.0 4.7 21.5 17.2 9.5 010101111-11111.1111,1111111111ESIMEMIESESIMIESNISINIEVS111141111111 Approach Delay (s) 36.5 39.0 19.8 10.5 TANCIMISZE=1:1111.11131111PPITE11111111712.11111111121101112Y 111111111Will; N, Allit : 111111110 -1$4162,111221!%.4714111 de, vA c 11:*:,, , A ..AA& AATAA;4.0, M . HCM Volume to Capacity i-„a„-tio krTIFICWiarirp:RfrMrrW'FrgRqpgtiftWiwwftfcwopn§*ffi , pa Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.5% ICU Level of Service V ' 7::::::" 'v.' 0111111111111121111111111:11111111111111111111111111111 1111111 ,...,.. -4r1441.40111: PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Appendix B: Signal Warrant Analysis Sheets A traffic signal warrant study based on the projected peak hour volumes was performed. The primary objective of using the peak hour traffic was determining whether Warrants 11 and 12 would be met for the intersections along A.W. Grimes Boulevard. Three of the five intersections met Warrants 11 and 12. The following pages are the results of warrants 11 and 12 for the three intersections. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company Intersection 2 !Warrant Passed? r N Gy) �t LC) Co N. CO 0) Minimum Vehicular Volume No Interruption of continuous traffic No Minimum pedestrian volume N/A School Crossings N/A Progressive Movement No Accident Experience N/A Systems N/A Combination of Warrants No Four Hour Volumes No Peak Hour Delay N/A Peak Hour Volume Yes Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Yes 800 (1) 700 E 600 U 500 Z t6 2 400 N Q Q 300 G7 200 c_ 2 100 - 0 300 Figure 4-5: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Full Warrant Criteria • 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 300 0 o 250 Figure 4-2.6 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Two High Hours 0. 0. 200 E 0 s 150 0 0100 2 in 50 c 0 400 500 , 600 I 700 800 900 Major Street- Total of Both Directions 1 1000 I 1100 1200 200 s 150 0) 100 0 0 50 0 400 Figure 4-2.4 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Eight High Hours > > 1 600 800 1000 1200 Major Street - Total 1400 1600 1800 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 A.W Grimes Blvd and Logan Dr Warrant Passed? 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume No 2 Interruption of continuous traffic No 3Minimum pedestrian volume N/A 4School Crossings N/A 5Progressive Movement No 6Accident Experience N/A 7 Systems N/A 8Combination of Warrants No 9 Four Hour Volumes No 10 Peak Hour Delay N/A 11 Peak Hour Volume Yes 12 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Yes 800 a) 700 600 U 500 Z cr 2 400 Q N Q 300 (1) 200 100 0 Figure 4-5: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Full Warrant Criteria 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Figure 4-2.6 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Two High Hours 300 0 0 2 250 Q Q E 200 a 150 i 100 2 eii `g 50 0 I 400 500 I 600 1 1 1 700 800 900 Major Street- Total of Both Directions f 1000 1100 1200 200 -g, 150 in 100 0 0 t 50 0 Figure 4-2.4 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Eight High Hours 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Major Street - Total Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Intersection 5 Warrant Passed? 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume No 2 Interruption of continuous traffic No 3Minimum pedestrian volume N/A 4School Crossings N/A 5 Progressive Movement No 6Accident Experience N/A 7 Systems N/A 8 Combination of Warrants No 9 Four Hour Volumes No 10 Peak Hour Delay N/A 11 Peak Hour Volume Yes 12 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Yes 800 700 0 p 600 U 500 Z ca 2 400 N 8_- 2 2 Q 300 U) p 200 c 100 Figure 4-5: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Full Warrant Criteria • 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 300 L U 0 250 Figure 4-2.6 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Two High Hours Q. CD 200 0 s 150 0, • 100 22 Cl) g 50 0T 400 500 600 I 700 800 900 Major Street- Total of Both Directions T 1000 1100 1200 200 150 100 0 0 50 0 Figure 4-2.4 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Eight High Hours 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Major Street - Total Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 G / \ S $ { c! A. !/ 0 { !d {| f )\ d \ 9 \ 161, ƒ` ,4 - - t , : - - . - ! !z. !y` E 7\_ 1{ :! \ ! !$ ] 1 /! ! )! !f VIA®8 M ! k ! = 8} ! ( { EXHIBIT U PHASING PLAN Turtle Creek Village Planned Unit Development South Creek Subdivision dam. Phasing Areas may be developed in incremental sub-phases _ t_� as approved by the Director of Public Works .a t � m of am mar s0 f Single F�milly D°lac a ±°y f Lc f/Imt ,{ Is PHASE III �Gy a iF°a nt. usF Is.IIIa[ tm f le Kenningham Park ga S 9qc. s �a F a ,s1 n PHA M„ SE I 'YHay 4es 5ingle FamlllY FamillY Detached tt.T Acres Dalacnea sllrele S� es. O a�A // in e.mm+.f Aaa. Blvd.120'ROW T A HI,OOm°3 coed 5.8 Acre3 )'4psu O 5in°l^Fem111y Data f-a swn aorx mx PH E III Single Fsmiily Al ached 3.5 Acres \ Single F-111Y Apaches 14'7 Ares f. PHASE II 4�a Elementary 5cho0110.5 ACYeS \ I Y Faso spam Sing e DelaCM1aa �,open \ O reef Srt Clay Madsen „ $ f�f a t u nlaIf a^1 m , a „` h Ree Center. Poect � nklopess11 ;,eenslopes emtov aaaoeoa w Subdivision JUNE 12 2001 s.. bu n Homes Scale l"=200' efiisnwcku.e+rta flf,s'frexu)f)f) °)I Planer. Location Map emu cempmpa Tuma A,w.lan ine. NTC 0 100'20o' 400' un�Tau're)os EXHIBIT M LICENSE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this day of , 2001, by and between the CITY OF ROUND ROCK, (hereinafter "Licensor"), a Texas home rule municipality, and the CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P., (hereinafter, "Licensee", whether one or more). Whereas, Licensor is the owner of the public right-of-way located within the Turtle Creek Planned Unit Development as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein; and Whereas, Licensee desires to exercise certain rights and privileges upon public rights-of-way located within the Property; and Whereas, Licensor desires to grant Licensee certain rights and privileges upon public rights-of-way within the Property; and NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: License 1. Licensee shall have the right to install, construct, operate, maintain, upgrade, and repair landscaping, lighting and irrigation systems in, over and upon public rights-of-way located within the Property, as described in Exhibit "A". It is understood that this Agreement creates a license only and that Licensee does not and shall not claim at any time any interest or estate of any kind in the public rights-of-way located within the Property by virtue of this license. It is further understood that before the installation of any current or subsequent landscaping or irrigation systems, Licensee shall present a detailed landscaping plan, with associated irrigation, to the Director of Planning and the Director of Public Works for review and approval. It is further understood that Licensee must comply with all other requirements of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Round Rock, Texas. It is further understood that Licensor has no duty to maintain, operate, replace, upgrade, or repair any improvement in or upon the Property, including the payment of any fees of any kind associated with any improvements. 0 0 0 0 6 4 2 8. doc :: ODNA\WORLDOX \O: \WDOX\CORA\GNL\ LICENSE \ TURLTE \ 00006428. WPD c'' c Consideration 2. In consideration for this license, Licensee shall pay Licensor $10.00 and other valuable consideration paid by Licensee to Licensor. Nonassignable 3. This license granted in this Agreement is personal to Licensee or any property owners association created to maintain Licensee's Improvements. This Agreement is not assignable except to said property owners association. Any otherassignment of this Agreement will automatically terminate the license. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee shall be permitted to assign Licensee's license under this Agreement for any entity acquiring all or a portion of Licensee's property adjacent to the Property provided such assignee assumes Licensee's obligations and rights granted under this Agreement, and Licensee shall be released from any and all obligations hereunder accruing after such assignment. Terminable at Will 4. This Agreement is terminable by either party at will by the giving of actual notice to the other party. Upon termination, any improvements to Property will become the property of Licensor and it is agreed that Licensor will not need to reimburse Licensee for any costs expended for said improvements. Indemnity 5. Licensee shall comply with the requirements of all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and shall indemnify and hold harmless Licensor, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, causes of action, expenses of litigation, court costs, and attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any person, or for damage to any property, arising out of or in connection with Licensee's exercise of the license under this Agreement. Release 6. Licensee assumes full responsibility for its exercise of the license, and hereby releases, relinquishes and discharges Licensor, its officers, agents and employees, from all claims, demands, and causes of action of every kind and character, including the cost of defense thereof, for any injury to, including death, of person (whether they be third persons, contractor, or employees of either of the parties hereto) and any 00006428 . do c ::ODMA\WORLDOX\O: \ WDOX\CORK\GNL\ LICENSE \ TURLTE \ 00006428 .WPD cdC loss of or damage to property (whether the same be that either of the parties hereto or of third parties) caused by or alleged to be caused, arising out of, or in connection with Licensee's exercise of the license under this Agreement whether or not said claims, demands and causes of action in whole or in part are covered by insurance. Venue 7. This Agreement shall be construed under and accord with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas. Notice 8. Notice shall be mailed to the addresses designated herein or as may be designated in writing by the parties from time to time and shall be deemed received when sent postage prepaid U.S. mail to the following addresses: CITY: City of Round Rock ATTN: City Manager 221 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 COMPANY: Attn: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this AGREEMENT is executed on this day of , 2001. CITY OF ROUND ROCK By: ROBERT A. STLUKA, JR., Mayor CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P. 3. By: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON) Title: Printed Name: BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, on this day personally appeared ROBERT A. STLUKA, JR., as Mayor of the City of Round Rock, a Texas Home Rule Municipality, on behalf of said municipality, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the day of , 2001. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Texas STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, on this day personally appeared as for CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the day of , 2001. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Texas 4. After Recording, Please Return To: Brown, McCarroll Sheets & Crossfield, L.L.P. 309 East Main Round Rock, Texas 78664 DATE: July 6, 2001 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting — July 12, 2001 ITEM: 10.B.2. Consider an ordinance adopting original zoning of District Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 47 on 141.69 acres of land, more or less, out of the P. A. Holder No. 9, A-297, in Williamson County, Texas, and rezone 35.33 acres of land, more or less, out of the P. A. Holder Survey No. 9, A-297, in Williamson County, Texas from SF -2 (Single Family -Standard Lot) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 47. (Turtle Creek PUD) (First Reading) The proposed land use complies with the adopted General Plan. On June 20, 2001 the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended adoption of original PUD zoning. Resource: Joe Vining, Planning Director History: A public hearing was held on June 20, 2001 by the Planning and Zoning Commission. At that time the Commission recommended adoption of original PUD zoning with the addition of a fence standard adjacent to public open space and alleys. This standard has been added. Funding: N/A Cost: Provision of city services. Source of Funds: General Fund Outside Resources: Continental Homes of Texas, L.P. Impact: Fire and Police Benefit: Expanded ad valorem and sales tax base with adoption of the recommended original zoning and rezoning. Public Comment: Public Notice and a public hearing were held in accordance with City of Round Rock's Zoning Ordinance. Sponsor: Planning and Community Development Department. AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 47 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON THIS AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN (this "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Round Rock, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation, having its offices at 221 East Main Street, Round Rock, Texas 78664 (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"). WHEREAS, the Owner has submitted a request to the City to zone approximately 177 acres of land as a Planned Unit Development ("PUD"), said property being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred to as the "Property" or "Turtle Creek Village PUD"), and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11, Section 11.316(8), Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, the Owner has submitted a development plan setting forth the development conditions and requirements within the PUD (the "Development Plan"), which Development Plan is contained in Section II of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Owner's application for a PUD. NOW THEREFORE BY THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the City and the Owner agrees as follows: I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. CONFORMITY WITH DEVELOPMENT PLAN All uses and development within the Property shall generally conform to the Development Plan set forth in Article II herein. 2. CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS No changes or modifications will be made to this Agreement or the Development Plan unless all provisions pertaining to changes or modifications as stated in Article III, Section 1 below are followed. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Development Agreement 3. ZONING VIOLATION The Owner understands that any person, firm, corporation or other entity violating any conditions or terms of the Development Plan shall be subject to any and all penalties for the violation of any zoning ordinance as stated in Section 1.601, Code of Ordinances, (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, as amended. 4. CONCEPT PLAN Approval of this Ordinance shall constitute approval of the Concept Plan for the Turtle Creek Village PUD. 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5.1 Assignment. Neither party may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without having first obtained the prior written consent of the other which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section shall not prevent the Owner from conveying the Property or portions of the Property, together with all development rights and obligations contained in this Agreement. 5.2 Necessary Documents and Actions. Each party agrees to execute and deliver all such other and further instruments and undertake such actions as are or may become necessary or convenient to effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 5.3 Severability. In case any one or more provisions contained herein are deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions hereof and in such event, this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. 5.4 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understandings or representations of the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 5.5 Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Development Agreement State of Texas. 5.6 Venue. All obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas and venue for any action arising hereunder shall be in Williamson County. 5.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any person or entity, other than the parties hereto (and their respective successors and assigns) any rights, benefits or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement. 5.8 Duplicate Originals. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each of equal dignity. 5.9 Notices. Until changed by written notice thereof, any notice required under this Agreement may be given to the respective parties by certified mail, postage prepaid or by hand delivery to the address of the other party shown below: OWNER: Continental Homes of Texas, L.P. Attn: Mr. Terry Mitchell 12554 Riata Vista Circle 2nd Floor Austin, TX 78727 5.10 Effective Date. CITY OF ROUND ROCK: City of Round Rock, Texas 212 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 Attn: Director of Planning This Agreement shall be effective from and after the date of due execution hereof by all parties. 5.11 Binding Effect. This Agreement and the Development Plan binds and benefits the Owner and its successors and assigns. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Development Agreement II. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. DEFINITIONS Words and terms used herein, not specifically defined in this section, shall have their usual force and meaning, or as defined in the Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "the Code". For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section: Alley. A minor private right-of-way, either two-way or one-way, located through the interior of blocks within a parcel owned by the Homeowners Association and providing vehicular and service access to the side or rear of properties; use of the parcels is for the benefit of adjoining property owners and is subject to limitations, rules and restrictions of the Homeowners Association. Appurtenances. Spires, belfries, cupolas, water tanks, ventilators, chimneys or other appurtenances usually required to be placed above the roof level and not intended for human occupancy and not exceeding ten feet (10') in height. Carport. A structure with one or more sides, covered with a roof and constructed specifically for the storage of one or more vehicles. Civic Uses. A parcel designated for cultural services use, private primary education facilities use, primary educational facilities use or child development centers (daycare). Common open space. A parcel of land or an area of water, or a combination of land and water, which may include floodplain and wetland areas, within a development site and intended for the use and enjoyment of residents of the development and, where designated, the community at large. Condominium building. A building or portion thereof used or intended to be used as a home for two (2) or more households living independently of each other. Dry Utilities Public utilities other than water, wastewater and storm sewer. These include but are not necessarily limited to electricity, gas, telephone, cablevision and other communication system lines. Exhibits to PUD. The following is a list of exhibits to this PUD Ordinance: Exhibit "A" — Property description Exhibit "B" — Affidavit of No Liens Exhibit "C" — Single Family Detached Standards TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 4 Development Agreement Exhibit "D" — Single Family Attached Standards Exhibit "E" — Open Space Standards Exhibit "F" — Parking Standards Exhibit "G" — Daycare Standards Exhibit "H" — Street Sections Exhibit "I" — Planting Strips Exhibit "J" — TIA Exhibit "K" — Land Use Plan Exhibit "L" — Phasing Plan Exhibit "M"- License Agreement Forsman Life Estate Lot. A one -acre tract of land situated within the boundaries of the Turtle Creek Village PUD, on which a resident, Paul Forsman, currently resides. Owner has conveyed a life estate to Paul Forsman; Owner plans to develop this property pursuant to this Ordinance at such time that the property is released to Owner. Front Porch. An unairconditioned roofed structure attached to the front of a house. Side and rear porches are not subject to these same requirements. A front porch may include ramps for handicapped access. Enclosure of front porches shall not be permitted. A restrictive covenant forbidding enclosure of front porches shall be placed on the property and shall be enforced by the Homeowners Association. Homeowners Association ("HOA"). An organization made up of the property owners in the area, which is responsible for maintenance of private alleys, and the open spaces not conveyed to the City, and which shall have the authority to make and collect assessments sufficient to operate and maintain private alleys, street trees and open spaces. A Homeowners Association shall be created for Turtle Creek Village PUD; the documents creating the HOA shall be recorded with this Agreement. Open Style Fence A fence designed to enclose a private yard, which abuts a park, green strip, golf course or alley. The required features of this fence include the ability to see through the fence (a minimum of 50% of the fence surface area shall be open), construction of low maintenance materials and posts or columns set in concrete.. The maximum height of an open style fence shall be 42 inches in a street yard ( street yards do not include alleys) and 48 inches for fences other than wrought iron or equivalent fences in other yards. Wrought iron or equivalent fences shall not exceed six feet in height. Masonry columns are permitted as part of all Open Style Fences. Pedestrian Way. An access way located within Residential Condominium development areas providing pedestrian movement within the area. Plan. The criteria and specifications as set forth in this Development Plan and the accompanying layout which is attached hereto as Exhibit "K". Planting Strip. A portion of land of public street right-of-way or a portion of land abutting private property, which is reserved for the purpose of landscaping and TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 5 Development Agreement installation of street trees. Cross sections of various street rights-of-way and abutting private property reflecting these planting strips are attached hereto as Exhibit "I". Private Interior Drive. A minor private access way either two-way or one-way, located within Residential Condominium development areas and providing vehicular and other access to public streets. All private interior drives will be maintained by the Homeowners Association for the area. Protected Trees. A protected tree, for the purpose of this PUD, is an individual tree of a tree species identified as protected in the City Code with a diameter of nineteen inches (19") or greater if located in a proposed street right-of-way or a diameter of eight inches (8") or greater if located on a townhouse or condominium lot. Residential Condominium. The use of a site for two (2) or more dwelling units, within one or more condominium buildings with each dwelling unit having a private external entrance and private parking and having one or more common walls. All common areas that form part of a Residential Condominium development shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association for private open space. Residential Street. The entire width included in any public right-of-way which is open for the use of the public to accommodate motor vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists and transit facilities. • A "standard residential collector" provides circulation within neighborhoods to carry circulation from local streets to arterial streets, • An "alternative residential collector street" provides circulation within neighborhoods to carry circulation from local streets to arterial streets using a smaller street section than a standard collector. • A "boulevard collector" is a short distance, low speed circulation corridor, that traverses a residential area and segregates the traffic and parking activity from opposing traffic. • A "standard local street" is a street designed primarily for access to abutting residential property. • An "alternative local street" is a street designed primarily for access to abutting residential property using a smaller street section than a standard local street. • An "access street" is a low volume street which is parallel and adjacent to an arterial street or open space area which primarily provides access to abutting properties located on one side of the lane. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 6 Development Agreement Residential Townhouse. The use of a series of sites for two or more dwelling units, constructed with common or abutting walls and each located on a separate ground parcel within the total development site, together with common area serving all dwelling units within the townhouse group. "Shall", "must", "will", "should", and "may". The words "shall", "must", and "will" are always mandatory. The words "should" and "may" are discretionary. Single Family Residential. A small lot single-family detached residential subdivision that allows the lot size to be reduced with the resulting space gained being assigned to common open space. Shared driveway. A paved vehicular access designed to residential driveway standards, which extends to and branches off to two (2) or more homes; which is privately owned and maintained and does not require a turn around area at the end of the driveway. Shared driveways shall not exceed one hundred fifty feet (150') in length. Single-family Attached Residential. The use of a series of sites for two or more dwelling units, constructed with common or abutting walls. Residential Condominium and Residential Townhouse may both be implemented as single-family attached residential. Single-family Detached Residential. The use of a site for only one dwelling unit with an attached or detached garage unit. Traffic calming measures. Street design elements intended to reduce the speed of vehicular traffic, which shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to the approval of construction drawings for each final plat. 2. PROPERTY This Development Plan covers approximately 177.0 acres of land, located within the city limits of Round Rock, Texas, and more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "A". 3. PURPOSE AND DESIGN 3.1 Compliance with Code requirements. The purpose of this Plan is to insure a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") that: (i) is, on the whole, equal to or superior to development that would occur under the standard ordinance requirements, (ii) is in harmony with the General Plan of the City of Round Rock, Texas, (iii) does not have an undue adverse affect upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utilities or any other matters affecting the public health, safety and welfare, (iv) is adequately provisioned by essential public facilities and services, and (v) will be developed and maintained so as to not TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 7 Development Agreement dominate, by scale or massing of structures, the immediate neighboring properties or interfere with their development or use in accordance with any existing zoning district. 3.2 Intent. The design of this Plan includes a variety of potential residential land uses including single-family residential, townhouse and condominiums. The design includes open spaces including courts, parks, linear parks, and greenbelts. The plan promotes pedestrian activity and circulation through well-designed streetscapes that provide for the safe and efficient movement of vehicular traffic and pedestrian circulation separate from the high speed arterial. 3.3 Civic Uses. Civic uses that are oriented to the general public are an important element in the Plan. The locations of these civic uses are designated on the Land Use Plan. 3.4 Open Space. Open space design is a significant part of the Plan. These serve as areas for neighborhood gatherings and as organizing elements for the neighborhood. Open space should be distributed throughout the neighborhood. In addition to addressing the recreational needs of residents, open space provides places and opportunities for interaction within the community. 3.5 Pedestrian Orientation. The Plan is to be pedestrian oriented. To accomplish this goal, the street pattern is designed to reduce vehicle travel speeds and encourage pedestrian activity. The design for various street cross sections is shown in Exhibit "II" attached hereto. 4. APPLICABILITY OF CITY ORDINANCES 4.1 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The Property shall be regulated for purposes of zoning and subdivision by this Plan. All aspects not specifically covered by this Plan shall be regulated by applicable sections of the Code. 4.2 Other Ordinances. All other Ordinances within the Code shall apply to the Property, except as clearly modified by this Plan. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 8 Development Agreement 5. DEVELOPMENT AREAS The Property will be divided into five (5) Development Areas: Development Area A: single family detached residential, Development Area B: single family attached residential, Development Area C: school site, Development Area D: daycare site and Development Area E: public and private open space, all as designated on the PUD Land Use plan, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "K". 6. PERMITTED USES AND LIMITATIONS The Property will be used and developed in accordance with the requirements as set forth in this Agreement and, if not set forth herein, by applicable sections in the Code. Specific permitted uses and limitations applicable to the separate development areas are as follows: 6.1 Development Area A - Single Family Detached Residential. The permitted uses and limitations for the Single Family (Detached) Residential Areas are detailed on Exhibit "C" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.2 Development Area B - Single Family Attached Residential - Residential Condominiums or Residential Townhouses. Single Family Attached Residential shall include either Residential Condominiums or Residential Townhouses. The permitted uses and limitations for the Single Family Attached Residential Areas are detailed on Exhibit "D" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.3 Development Area C - School Site. The permitted uses and limitations for the elementary school site are detailed on Exhibit "G" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.4 Development Area D - Day Care Site. The permitted uses and limitations for the day care site are detailed on Exhibit "G" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.5 Development Area E - Open Space. The permitted uses and limitations for all open space are detailed on Exhibit "E" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 9 Development Agreement Agreement. 7. STORM WATER DETENTION Storm water detention for the Property shall be provided in accordance with City Code. 8. ROADWAYS 8.1 Residential Streets. The street system shall consist of public streets, private alleys, and landscaped rights-of-way accommodating automobiles, public transit, bicycles, pedestrians and landscaped areas. Rear service alleys are a preferred element in the design of the neighborhood. Streets shall be laid out so as to discourage their use by through traffic. On -street parking along one or both sides of the street is the normal street condition. All streets and alleys within the Turtle Creek Village PUD, with the exception of A. W. Grimes Boulevard, shall adhere to the criteria as stated in Exhibit "H". 8.2 Innovative Design. The Director of Public Works and Fire Marshall may approve the use of roadway designs that are not listed herein. Said approval shall be considered a minor change to the Development Plan. 8.3 Blocks. Blocks shall generally be not more than one thousand (1,000) feet in length, and shall be, at minimum, bounded on either end of the axis by a local street. Block lengths exceeding this length may be approved by the Planning Director for good and sufficient reasons (example: open space frontage, curvilinear streets and/or where alleys are provided). 8.4 Traffic Calming Measures. The use of traffic calming measures intended to reduce the speed of vehicular traffic within the subdivision are permitted throughout the Turtle Creek Village PUD subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works and the Fire Marshall. 8.5 Alleys. (a) Width and Paving. Alleys, if constructed, shall have a minimum right of way width of twenty feet (20') with a concrete surface of not less than TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 10 Development Agreement sixteen feet (16') in width. All alley paving shall be done in accordance with City standards and with the approval of the Director of Public Works. Alleys shall be approximately parallel to the frontage of the street. (b) Intersecting alleys or utility easements. Where two alleys or utility easements intersect or turn at right angle, a cutoff of not less than ten feet (10') from the normal intersection of the property or easement line shall be provided along each property or easement line where practical. (c) Dead-end alleys. Dead-end alleys shall not extend more than ninety feet (90') and shall be approved by the Director of Public Works. (d) Private alleys. All alleys, if constructed, shall be designated as private alleys. All private alleys shall be shown as separate lots on all plats. All private alleys shall be conveyed to and maintained by the Homeowners Association. (e) Except as approved by the Director of Public Works, parking in alleys is prohibited. Signage shall be erected by the Owner in alleys to indicate that parking is prohibited. 8.6 Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be separated by a Planting Strip as shown on Exhibit "I". Sidewalks may be located outside the right-of-way for the purpose of saving existing trees provided (i) it is approved by the Director of Public Works and City legal counsel, and (ii) they are located in a public easement shown on the plat. 8.7 Street Trees. (a) Location. Trees shall be located along all streets (except where existing trees remain in the right-of-way) as shown on Exhibit "H". (b) Species. Street trees include suitable shade tree varieties. The following tree species are permitted: • Burr Oak • Cedar Elm • Chinese (Lacebark) Elm • Chinese Pistache • Chinquapin Oak • Live Oak • Monterey Oak • Pecan • Shumard Oak TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 11 Development Agreement • Texas Red Oak Additional tree species may be used with the approval of the City Urban Forester. Generally, no more than twenty percent (20%)of the total street trees on a single street, which is greater than four hundred feet (400') in length, shall be of one species unless approved by the City Urban Forester. (c) Planting Plan. The Owner shall submit a street tree planting plan in conjunction with the submittal of construction plans for each phase of the Property. (d) License and Maintenance Agreement. The City shall grant a license and maintenance agreement to the HOA for the installation, maintenance, replacement, upgrade and/or repair of landscape improvements constructed within any and all planting strips for the Property. Said License Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "M". 8.8 Planting Criteria. • Street trees should be kept out of (i) intersection triangles at a minimum of thirty-five feet (35') by thirty-five feet (35') from the face of the curb, and (ii) alley/street intersection triangles at a minimum of twenty-five feet (25') by twenty-five feet (25'), as measured from the center of the intersection. A sketch reflecting these specifications is attached hereto as Exhibit "I". • Street trees shall be planted to avoid interference with street lights, signage and other fixtures. • Planting shall remain at least five feet (5') from edge of driveways. • Spacing should be small trees, twenty feet (20'); medium trees, thirty feet (30'); and large trees, forty feet (40'). Exact tree spacing and the separation of tree species shall both be evaluated on a site-specific basis. • Planting should be at least five feet (5') from underground utilities and twenty-five feet (25') from overhead lines. • Planting should be at least five feet (5') from fire hydrants. • Street trees and median trees shall be planted a minimum of four feet (4') from the back of the curb. • Shade trees shall be container grown with a minimum caliper size of two and a half inches (2.5"). TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 12 Development Agreement • Ornamental trees shall be container grown with a minimum caliper size of one and a half inches (1.5"). • Caliper size, height, measurement and other specifications shall be as specified in American Standards for Nursery Stock (ANSI260.1) 8.9 Median Trees. Median trees shall include shade or ornamental tree species. Medians may also contain shrubs and plant groundcover.. The following tree species are permitted Shade Trees: Ornamental Trees: Bald Cypress Cherry Laurel Burr Oak Crape Myrtle Cedar Elm Deciduous Yaupon Chinaquapin Oak Desert Willow Chinese (Lacebark) Elm Flame Leaf Sumac Chinese Pistache Mexican Buckeye Live Oak Mexican Plum Monterey Oak Mountain Laurel Pecan Redbud Shumard Oak Texas Persimmon Texas Ash Texas Pistache Texas Red Oak Vitex Whitebud Yaupon Additional species may be used with the approval of the City Urban Forester. In general, no more than twenty percent (20%) of the total median trees on a single street, which is greater than four hundred feet (400') in length, shall be of one species unless approved by the City Urban Forester. 8.10 Access Streets. Access streets may be accessed from any street type or alley other than A. W. Grimes Boulevard. A Planting Strip shall be constructed in the area between all access lanes and A. W. Grimes Boulevard. The Planting Strip shall consist of a berm with trees, shrubs, grasses and a low, penetrable fence such as wrought iron or split rail, to provide a visual and physical barrier between the access lanes and A. W. Grimes Boulevard. 8.11 A. W. Grimes Boulevard. (a) An agreement that will be mutually agreed upon between the Owner and the City regarding the construction of A. W. Grimes Boulevard shall be executed simultaneously with the adoption of this Agreement. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 13 Development Agreement (b) Pedestrian Underpass. If approved by the Director of Public Works, the Owner shall contribute to the cost of construction of a pedestrian underpass in compliance with the approved arterial roadway plans, located on A.W. Grimes Boulevard, which abuts the southern Property boundary. 8.12 Traffic Impact Analysis. A Traffic Impact Analysis ("TIA") has been approved by the City Traffic Engineer and is attached hereto as Exhibit "J". Street standards shall be designed in accordance with the TIA. 9. UTILITY LINES 9.1 Construction of Utility Lines. All utility lines that pass under a street shall be installed before the street is paved, whenever practical. All utility lines that pass under the street pavement shall be installed to a point at least three feet (3') beyond the edge of the pavement. City utility assignments shall be arranged so that utilities are not located underneath alleys except to cross perpendicularly for distribution. Subject to the approval of the electric and gas provider for the property, buried utilities may be located within the alley service drive and under public street pavement, three feet (3') inside the edge of the pavement. Electric distribution shall be provided by means of underground service within the subdivision. Overhead service to individual lots shall not be permitted. All water, wastewater and drainage utilities shall be located in the front public right-of-way. 10. STREET LIGHTS The Developer may, with City approval, incorporate alternative lighting standards designed to aesthetically enhance the Turtle Creek Village PUD as long as the following conditions are satisfied: (a) The electric utility provider for the property agrees to accept the obligation of providing the required maintenance for such lighting at no additional cost to the City. (b) All street lights provide the required level of lighting, as approved by the Director of Public Works. 11. PARKLAND DEDICATION OR DESIGNATION All land to be dedicated for use as parkland within the Turtle Creek Village PUD shall conform with the criteria set forth on Exhibit "E" attached hereto and incorporated herein. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 14 Development Agreement 12. DENSITY A maximum of seven hundred fifty (750) dwelling units may be constructed on the property, which converts to an overall gross density of 4.24 units per acre. 13. PHASING Phasing of the Turtle Creek Village PUD shall be in general accordance with the Phasing Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "L". The phasing may be amended by a revised Concept Plan approved by the City Planning and Zoning Commission. 14. NON -CONFORMING USES 14.1 Forsman Life Estate Lot. The Forsman Life Estate does not conform to the provisions of this Agreement and shall be deemed a non -conforming use. At such time that the Forsman Life Estate Lot is released to the Owner, the Owner may subdivide and develop said lot as either Single Family Detached Residential or Single Family Attached Residential in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 15. REQUIRED BUILDING MATERIALS Residential building exteriors may be finished in brick stone, cast stone, stucco, or painted cementious siding, such as "Hardiboard". Wood siding, vinyl siding, and metal siding is prohibited. 16. FENCES Fences that abut parks, green strips and alleys shall be Open Style Fences as defined in this agreement. 17. INTERPRETATION OF USE Interpretation of uses not clearly permitted or prohibited shall be made in writing by the Director of Planning. A copy of interpretations shall be provided to the Owner and the City Building Inspector. 18. TREE PRESERVATION Owner shall make every reasonable effort to either preserve or relocate the existing trees within the Turtle Creek Village PUD. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 15 Development Agreement 18.1 Tree Protection Plan. (a) Preliminary Plat. A tree survey showing all protected trees (as defined in Section 1 herein) shall be provided with the filing of each preliminary plat. The preliminary plat must demonstrate that the subdivision design will result in the reasonable protection of protected trees and significant tree clusters with a crown diameter of one hundred feet (100') or greater. The tree survey must be reviewed by the City Urban Forester. (b) Tree Protection Plan. A tree protection plan, which identifies all protected tree species located within proposed street rights-of-way together with a calculation of the total number of caliper inches of protected trees to be removed shall be provided with the filing of each preliminary plat. The tree protection plan must be approved by the City Urban Forester. The tree protection plan shall also show specific tree protection measures for protected trees within street rights-of-way and the area within ten feet (10') of said rights-of-way. (c) Tree Replacement Plan. Each preliminary plat shall include a plat note, which states that the total number of caliper inches of protected trees being removed shall be replaced. A replacement tree plan shall be provided as part of the subdivision construction plans and must be approved by the City Urban Forester. (d) Credit for Street Trees. All street trees planted by Owner shall be credited towards any Owner obligation to replace protected trees. (e) Site Plan. Application for site plan approval for uses other than single family detached homes shall be accompanied by a tree protection and replacement plan to include a survey for trees 8 inches in diameter or larger. 18.2 Street Trees. (a) Street trees and associated irrigation fronting along A. W. Grimes Boulevard shall be installed as part of the subdivision improvements along A. W. Grimes Boulevard. (b) Street trees and associated irrigation plans shall be submitted as part of the construction drawings for subdivision improvements for all streets within the PUD other than A. W. Grimes. The actual planting of street trees and associated irrigation may be permitted to be delayed until the homes are constructed on each block, provided that Owner posts a fiscal guarantee in an amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the estimated cost of such improvements. The estimate of the cost shall be approved by the City Urban Forester and shall be in the same form as required for other subdivision improvements. (c) The HOA shall be responsible for the replacement of all street trees within the Property. The HOA shall also be responsible for the maintenance and replacement of all other landscaping and associated irrigation located within center medians, with the exception of landscaping improvements constructed within the median of A. W. Grimes TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 16 Development Agreement Boulevard. With the exception of A.W. Grimes Boulevard, all landscaping within center medians shall be irrigated by an underground irrigation system with water meters in the name of the HOA. The Urban Forester shall approve the size and species for all replacement trees within public rights of way. No street trees shall be removed without the written approval of the City Urban Forester. (d) The HOA and or the individual homeowners shall be responsible for the irrigation and routine maintenance of the trees located in front of homeowners' lots that are situated within the portion of the public right-of-way between the sidewalk and the curb. The restrictive covenants, recorded for the subdivision shall clearly identify this responsibility. (e) The estimated costs of maintaining street trees, landscaping and irrigation (including the cost of water, electricity and reserve fund to replace equipment) shall be provided along with an estimate of projected monthly HOA fees required to support such maintenance and repair. (f) Street tree planting plans shall be submitted as part of the subdivision construction drawings and approved by the Urban Forester. These street plans shall also identify trees to be preserved that are identified in the tree survey. The Urban Forester shall inspect and accept all trees and irrigation installations. Street tree plans shall include all specifications of tree installation. (g) Owner shall post a bond to ensure three (3) years of maintenance of street trees and median landscaping improvements, including irrigation. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 17 Development Agreement MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 1. CHANGES TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.1 Minor Changes. Minor changes to this Agreement or the Development Plan which do not substantially change this Agreement or the Development Plan may be approved administratively, if approved in writing, by the Director of Public Works or the Director of Planning and Community Development, and the City Attorney. 1.2 Major Changes. Major changes to this Agreement or the Development Plan must be resubmitted following same procedure required by the original PUD application. 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDED The Round Rock General Plan is hereby amended to Agreement and Development Plan. Continental Homes Of Texas, L.P. (a Texas limited partnership) By: CHTEX of Texas, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) Its sole general partner By: . Mitchell e President Date: , 2001 reflect the provisions of this Cit t and Rock, Texas Date: /7— — - , 2001 TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 18 Development Agreement Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres EXHIBIT A - TRACT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 141.69 ACRES OF OUT OF THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY NO. 9, ABSTRACT 297, IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 141.69 ACRES OF LAND BEING THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 153.25 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO CARL ANTON FORSMAN, ET AL, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 128, PAGE 456 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 141.69 ACRE TRACT ALSO BEING A PORTION OF THE 151.37 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a %-inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of the following described 151.37 acre tract, being the southwest corner of Lot 11, Block A of South Creek Section One, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 66 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being in the north line of Block B of South Creek Section Seventeen, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 230 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, with the south line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said South Creek Section Seventeen, S 83°28'55" W, passing at a distance of 504.36 feet a 1 /4 -inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of a called 1.50 are tract of land described in a deed to Hugh Noel as recorded in Document No. 9652164 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the northeast corner of Round Rock East, a subdivision, continuing with the south line of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said Round Rock East, passing at a distance of 1615.16 feet a 1/2 -inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of the said Round Rock East, being a northeast corner of a called 16.812 acre Park Site as shown on Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet D, Slide 70 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, continuing with the south line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said Park Site, a total distance of 1758.54 feet to a 5" fence corner post found for the southwest corner of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the northwest corner of the said Park Site, and being in the east line of Block A of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two; THENCE, with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said Block A, N 04°40'12" W, passing at a distance of 485.27 feet the northeast corner of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two, being the southeast corner of Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 115 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, continuing a total distance of 635.97 feet to a '/2 -inch iron rod found for an angle point in the east line of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine; THENCE, continuing the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, the following ten (10) courses: 1. N 05°37'14" W, a distance of 303.14 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 01°53'59" W, a distance of 134.84 feet to a 60-D nail found; 3. N 01 °42'46" E, a distance of 271.01 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 04°49'10" W, a distance of 297.49 feet to a'/Z- inch iron rod found; 5. N 05°46'57" W, a distance of 248.36 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; Page 1 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 6. N 03°39'14" W, a distance of 184.70 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 7. N 05°05'29" W, a distance of 247.21 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 8. N 05°31'59" W, a distance of 214.93 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 9. N 05°11'44" W, a distance of 274.53 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 10. N 05°47'57" W, a distance of 48.62 feet to a'/ -inch iron rod found, for the northeast corner of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, being a southeast corner of the remainder of a called 231.374 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Gaston Development Co. and Garland Development Co. as recorded in Volume 710, Page 700 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east tine of the said 231.374 acre tract the following five (5) courses: 1. N 04°42'21" W, a distance of 274.53 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 14°35'00" W, a distance of 68.55 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 01°12'00" W, a distance of 58.95 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 19°18'53" E, a distance of 57.66 feet to a.5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 5. N 30°12'00" W, a distance of 47.68 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set, for the northeast corner of the said 231.374 acre tract, being the southeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west fine of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 6.591 acre tract the following four (4) courses: 1. N 36°28'50" W, a distance of 39.42 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 22°05'00" W, a distance of 34.83 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 00°40'00" E, a distance of 122.92 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 521.98 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set, for the northwest corner of said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of the said 6.591 acre tract, and being in the southeast line of a Union Pacific Railroad, (formerly known as international and Great Northern Company Railroad) 100' right-of-way as recorded in Volume 17, Page 705 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, from which a 1 -inch iron pipe with bolt found bears N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 1.65 feet; THENCE, with the northwest line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the southeast line of the said Union Pacific right-of-way, the following two (2) courses: Page 2 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 1. N 72°31'19" E, a distance of 465.41 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. a distance of 476.44 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 07°39'26", with a radius of 3564.94 feet and whose chord bears N 71°15'15" E, a distance of 476.08 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set for the northwest corner of a called 2.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to David L. Carlin and Mary C. Carlin as recorded in Document No. 9759883 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for a northeast corner of said 151.37 acre tract; THENCE, leaving the southeast line of the said Union Pacific Railroad, being the northwest line of the original 153.25 acre tract, with the boundary of the said 2.0 acre tract and said 151.37 acre tract, the following six (6) courses: 1. S 14°40'00" E, at a distance of 7.82 feet to % inch iron rod found, a total distance of 211.08 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 2. N 53°39'15" E, a distance of 67.99 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 3. N 78°14'55" E, a distance of 88.43 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 4. S 78°19'58" E, a distance of 71.77 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 5. S 64°43'52" E, a distance of 120.44 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 6. S 70°33'46" E, a distance of 56.11 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek, being the southeast corner of the said 2.0 acre tract; being a northeast corner of said 151.37 acre tract, and being in the west line of a called 42.478 acre tract of land described in a deed to Richard C. Jennings as recorded in Document No. 9558188 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said 42.478 acre tract, the following two (2) courses: 1. S 14°38'22" E, a distance of 312.87 feet to a fence post on a cattle guard; 2. S 14°36'27" E, a distance of 1460.07 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; THENCE, continuing with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of a called 1.7 acre tract of land described in a deed to J & S Group, Ltd. as recorded in Volume 2525, Page 841 and Volume 2532, Page 623 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being the west line of South Creek Section Twenty, Phase One, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet L, Slide 201 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, S 07°00'43" E a distance of 545.21 feet to a %-inch iron rod found for the southwest corner of the said South Creek Section Twenty, Phase One, being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block B of South Creek Section Seven, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet G, Slide 259 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Seven, and the west line of the said South Creek Section One, the following two (2) courses: 1. S 06° 58' 17" E, a distance of 1507.12 feet to a 1% -inch iron pipe found for an angle point, and Page 3 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres. FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 2. S 07° 33' 54" E, a distance of 165.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 151.37 acres of land. SAVING AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following 9.68 acre tract of land: BEGINNING at a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found, being the northwest comer of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas, and being in the southeast line of a Union Pacific Railroad, (formerly known as International and Great Northern Company Railroad) 100' right-of-way as recorded in Volume 17, Page 705 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, from which a 1 -inch iron pipe with bolt found bears N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 1.65 feet; THENCE, with the northwest line of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the southeast line of the said Union Pacific right-of-way, the following two (2) courses: 1. N 72°31'19" E, a distance of 465.41 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found; 2. a distance of 476.44 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 07°39'26", with a radius of 3564.94 feet and whose chord bears N 71°15'15" E, a distance of 476.08 feet to a 5/8 - inch iron rod with cap found being the northwest corner of a called 2.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to David L. Carlin and Mary C. Carlin as recorded in Document No. 9759883 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the northeast corner of the said 151.37 acre tract; THENCE, leaving the southeast line of the said Union Pacific Railroad, being the northwest line of the said 151.37 acre tract, with the boundary of the said 2.0 acre tract and the said 151.37 acre tract, S 14°40'00° E, at a distance of 7.82 feet to'/z inch iron rod found, a total distance of 211.08 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: THENCE leaving the said boundary of the 2.0 acre tract and the 151.37 acre tract and crossing the said 151.37 acre tract the following seven (7) courses: 1. S 66° 50' 34" W, a distance of 163.08 feet to a point, 2. S 46° 48' 11" W, a distance of 307.03 feet to a point, 3. S 63° 14' 57" W, a distance of 102.12 feet to a point, 4. S 29° 13' 49" W, a distance of 140.23 feet to a point, 5. S 43° 17' 30" W, a distance of 292.61 feet to a point, 6. S 30° 10' 55" W, a distance of 143.90 feet to a point, Page 4 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres EN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 7. S 80° 43' 01" W, a distance of 108.09 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found, on the west line of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of the remainder of a called 231.374 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Gaston Development Co. and Garland Development Co. as recorded in Volume 710, Page 700 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the southeast comer of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 6.591 acre tract the following four (4) courses: 1. N 36°28'50" W, a distance of 39.42 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 22°05'00" W, a distance of 34.83 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 00°40'00" E, a distance of 122.92 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. North, a distance of 521.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 9.68 acres of land, more or Tess, and CONTAINING A NET TOTAL OF 141.69 ACRES OF LAND. THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the day of April, 2001 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 NN•N••NNN N•N•• JOHN STRAWBRIDGE IN�NNN11��N�NNN .1N..1. Page 5 of 5 J • n Strawbridg Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas POINT OF BEGINNING I 5 000000 . ,12E5 VOL. MOO. P0. MO 401034 W 163.0111 3O%03' i s 03'14'87• w 102.129 I N OO'40'00' E 122.92' IN 30'28'50' W slur Xf MAL .fta~ Sstraw w 140.23' 431730• w 292.01' 30'10$8• W 143.90' s 80.43'01• w 108.09' DAM) L. GRIM • NARY C. CMU* «� .r awnm meg am. —1aII{ fl Ml ARO 0 00081 VOL XX ACRES 114 1f Pas, t• 131.1. IS n' ear 1 If P. .• M.Ma M. M. SCALE : 1" = 500' ARRIL, 2001 TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 1029029.8 R ML tai K IM max 410144“ AIL n A..1a. R MO WO SIM anaaa Mt MOM MAW sec RMKK7.1 33.61 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000065504 1.7 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000066002 ter aa.1• Is -Nags XX HOMER 1].217 A0. VOL 21A. P0. 110 aq Pg as 1 151.37 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000066004 CHFFT CIF LEGEND ■ MARK ON CATTLE GUARD • WOOD FENCE POST • IRON PIPE FOUND • IRON ROD FOUND O IRON ROD SET 4 NAIL FOUND 4 CALCULATED POINT 0 0 N 4' 1„ >tioo -� N >^v v • x eek ti X O W > 0 % � M N .Y) N O m 33.61 Acre Tract Jennings Boundary EXHIBIT A - TRACT 2 FN00-066 (A.Y.) Sept. 20, 2000. C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 A DESCRIPTION OF 33.61 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THE REMAINDER OF A 42.478 ACRE TRACT TO RICHARD C. JENNINGS AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT # 9558188 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a iron rod found on the east line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract being the northeast corner of the said tract, and being the northwest corner of South Creek Section Two, a subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 266 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas THENCE with the said east line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Two, the following three (3) courses: 1. S 02°36'29" W, 140.95 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. S 00°14'37" E, 902.66 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 3. S 01°03'27" E, passing at 29.03 feet the most northerly southwest corner of the said South Creek Section Two, being the northwest corner of South Creek Section Six, a subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 360 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, in all 93.21 feet to a iron rod with cap set at the north line of a 1.7 acre tract, to J & S Group as recorded in volume 2525, page 841 and Volume 2532, Page ddm623 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, THENCE leaving the said east line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Six, with the said north line of the 1.7 acre tract, the following five (5) courses: 1. N 88°15'15" W, 32.98 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. a distance of 159.80 feet with an arc of a curve to the right whose central angle is 07°02'24", with a radius of 1300.56 feet and whose chord bears N 84°44'03" W, a distance of 159.70 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 3. N 81°12'51" W, 275.21 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 4. a distance of 212.01 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 31°03'02", with a radius of 391.21 feet and whose chord bears S 83°15'43" W, a distance of 209.43 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 5. S 67°44'12" W, 252.62 feet to a iron rod with cap set, at the west line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the east line of a 153.25 acre tract to Carl Anton Forsman, as recorded in Volume 128, Page 456, and Volume 208, Page 462 of the Deed Records of Williamson County Texas, THENCE with the said west line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the east line of the 153.25 acre tract the following two courses: 1. N 07°00'43" W, 143.78 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. N 14°36'27" W, 1460.07 feet to a point on a cattle guard: 3. N 14°38'22" W, 312.87 feet to a point, on the north line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the south line of a 27.61 acre tract to James J. Hoover, as recorded in volume 649, page 114 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the approximate centerline of Lake Creek, Page 1 of 2 33.61 Acre Tract Jennings Boundary FN00-066 (A.Y.) Sept. 20, 2000 C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 THENCE with the said north line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the said south line of the 27.61 acre tract, being the south line of a 1.5 acre tract to Roger A. Miller & Suzanne B. Miller, as recorded in Volume 790, Page 892, being the south line of a 23.217 acre tract to Sue Hoover, as recorded in Volume 2137, Page 218 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being the approximate centerline of Lake Creek, the following four (4) courses: 1. S 52°29'43" E, 613.25 feet to a point, 2. S 68°54'51" E, 325.04 feet to a point, 3. S 74°13'13" E, 365.00 feet to a point, 4. S 73°12'53" E, 240.68 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 33.61 acres of land more or less. THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property described herein is based upon a survey performed under my direction and supervision during September, 2000. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the 20th day of September, 2000 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 Page 2 of 2 John Strawf ridge Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas EXHIBIT A - TRACT3 1.7 Acre Tract Southerly Portion of 3.416 Ac. Drainage Easement PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FN01-067 (JRS) April 20, 2001 C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 A DESCRIPTION OF 1.7 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE RA. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THE 1.7 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P., AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT # 2000066002 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1.7 Acres of land situated in the P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 in Williamson County, Texas, being the remainder of a called 8.904 acre tract described in the deed of record in Volume 2532, Page 623 and in Volume 2525, Page 841, Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, SAVE AND EXCEPT all that portion of land described and platted as SOUTH CREEK SECTION TWENTY, PHASE 1, recorded in Cabinet L, Slide 201, Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property described herein is based upon a survey performed under my direction and supervision during September, 2000. A.D. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the 20th day of April, 2001 Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 Page 1 of 1 John Strawbridge Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas THE STA I OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TRAVIS EXHIBIT B That Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., the outright owners of the certain tract of land described in Document Number 2000066004, Document Number 2000065504, and Document Number 2000066002 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas (the "Property") do hereby state that there are no lien holders of the Property. THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TRAVIS This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2001, by Terry E. Mitchell, Vice President of CHTEX of Texas, Inc., a Delaware corporation, sole general partner of Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of said partnership and corporation. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Name: Notary Public — State of Texas Page 1 Exhibit "B" EXHIBIT "C" DEVELOPMENT AREA "A" - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The development areas labeled "Single Family Detached Residential" as shown on the attached Exhibit "K" contain approximately 88 net developable acres. The development standards for the "Single Family Detached Residential" development areas shall be as follows: 1. PERMITTED USES 1.1 Residential Uses. (a) Single family residential, as defined in Section 1 of this Development Plan, shall be permitted. 1.2 Non-residential uses. (a) Conservation areas (b) Outdoor recreational/athletic facilities (c) Outdoor swimming pools (d) Parks, playgrounds and playfields (e) Streams, lakes, waterways, or their drainageways (f) Wetlands (g) Club houses and community centers (h) Trail systems 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (see lot diagram attachment for Lot 'A' and Lot `B') 2.1 Lot Size. Lot Type 'A' Minimum lot size 4,500 SF 5,250 SF on corner lot Minimum Iot width 45 ft at the building line 50 ft on corner lot TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "C"_ Lot Type 'B' Minimum lot size 5,500 SF 6,050 SF on a corner lot Minimum lot width 50 ft at the building line 55 ft on corner lot 2.2 Height Regulations. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35'), exclusive of Appurtenances. 23 Minimum Setbacks. (i) Front Yard. There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than ten feet (10') from the front property line to the closest projection of the building face not including roof overhangs, provided that dry utilities are located in a private alley or public utility easement which abuts the private alley. In the event that dry utilities are located in the front of the building, there shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than fifteen (15) from the property line to the closest projection of the building face, not including roof overhangs. There shall be a minimum of twenty foot (20') setback from the front property line to the front of a garage to allow for permitted parking in the paved surface area of the front yard for lots that do not have private alley access. (ii) Interior Side Yard_ There shall be a side yard of not less than five feet (5') from the walls of building or accessory building to the interior side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iii) Street Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than ten feet (10') from the walls of building to the street side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the street side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iv) Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the rear most wall of the dwelling unit to the back property line and five feet (5') from rearmost wall of the garage to the back of the property line_ Parking is permitted within the driveway of the rear yard. If the driveway in the rear yard is located behind the garage, the garage setback shall be increased to twenty feet (20'). The driveway may be located adjacent to the garage on a concrete slab and shall have a depth of no less than twenty feet (20'). In the event that dry utilities are located within a public utility easement abutting a private alley, there shall be a rear yard setback of not less than twenty feet (20'). The tandem parking provided in the driveway shall be credited towards Owner's required number of parking spaces. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "C_ 2.4 Garage Regulations. Garages may be either attached or detached and shall be accessible from a public street or private alley. 3. PARKING REQUIREMENTS The number of parking spaces for Single Family Detached Residential shall be provided in accordance with the standards set forth in Exhibit "F" to this agreement. The parking and loading requirements for all other uses shall be in accordance with the Code. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Exhibit "C" EXHIBIT "D" DEVELOPMENT AREA "B" - SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL (RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM/ RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The development areas labeled "Single Family Attached Residential" on the attached Exhibit "K", consists of approximately 22 net developable acres. The development standards for the Single Family Attached development areas shall be as follows: 1. PERMITTED USES 1.1 Residential Uses. (a) Residential Condominium, as defined in Section 1 of the Development Plan (b) Residential Townhouse, as defined in Section 1 of the Development Plan 1.2 Non- residential uses. (a) Conservation areas (b) Outdoor recreational/athletic facilities (c) Outdoor swimming pools (d) Parks, playgrounds and playfields (e) Streams, lakes, waterways, or their drainageways (f) Wetlands (g) Club houses and community centers (h) Trail systems 2. RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (see lot diagram attachment) 2.1 Lot Size and Lot Width. Minimum lot size 4,500 SF 4,950 SF on corner lot Minimum lot width 50 ft at the building line 55 ft on corner lot TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "D" 2.2 Density. The overall density for any Residential Condominium area shall not exceed sixteen (16) units per developable acre. (The overall density for Development Area "D" shall not exceed three hundred fifty (350) units.) 2.3 Height Regulations. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35), exclusive of appurtenances. 2.4 Minimum Setbacks. (a) Front Yard. There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than ten feet (10') from the front property line to the closest projection of the building face not including roof overhangs, provided that dry utilities are located in a private alley or public utility easement which abuts the private alley. In the event that dry utilities are located in the front of the building, there shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than fifteen (15') from the property line to the closest projection of the building face, not including roof overhangs. (b) Interior Side Yard. There shall be a side yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the walls of the building to the interior side property line, not including a stoop, covered porch, covered terrace, balcony or bay. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (c) Street Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than ten feet (10') from the walls of building to the street side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the street side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (d) Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the rear most wall of the dwelling unit to the back property line and five feet (5') from rearmost wall of the garage or carport to the back of the property line. Parking is permitted within the paved surface area of the rear yard. If the driveway in the rear yard is located behind the garage, the garage setback shall be increased to twenty feet (20'). The driveway may be located adjacent to the garage on a concrete slab and shall have a depth of no less than twenty feet (20'). In the event that dry utilities are located within a public utility easement abutting a private alley, there shall be a rear yard setback of not less than twenty feet (20'). TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "D". 2.5 Spacing. Each building shall be at least fifteen feet (15') from the nearest dwelling unit. The roof overhang may extend two feet (2') into the side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. 2.6 Garage Regulations. Garages may be either attached or detached and accessible from a private alley or private interior drive. 2.7 Private Interior Drives. (a) Single Family Attached development areas may include private interior drives which shall serve the single family attached residents. Private interior drives, if any, shall be maintained by a Property Owners Association. All private interior drives shall be in compliance with all City fire and emergency regulations. Private interior drives shall provide a means for a vehicle to turn around for every one hundred fifty feet (150 in length. (b) All private interior drives shall be a minimum width of twenty-two feet (22'). 3. RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (see lot diagram attachment) 3.1 Lot Size and Lot Width. Minimum lot size 2,500 SF 2,750 SF on corner lot Minimum lot width 20 ft at the building line 25 ft on corner lot 3.2 Maximum Dwellings Per Lot. No more than one dwelling unit per lot shall be permitted. 3.3 Density. The overall density for any Residential Townhouse area shall not exceed sixteen (16) units per developable acre. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Exhibit "D", 3.4 Height Regulations. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35'), exclusive of appurtenances. 3.5 Minimum Setbacks. (i) Front Yard. There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than ten feet (10') from the front property line to the closest projection of the building face not including roof overhangs, provided that dry utilities are located in a private alley or public utility easement which abuts the private alley. In the event that dry utilities are located in the front of the building, there shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than fifteen (15') from the property line to the closest projection of the building face, not including roof overhangs. (ii) Interior Side Yard. No setback is required if a common wall is provided or five feet (5') where no common wall is provided. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the interior side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iii) Street Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than five feet (5') from the walls of building to the street side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the street side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iv) Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the rear most wall of the dwelling unit to the back property line and five feet (5') from rear most wall of the garage to the back of the property line. Parking is permitted within the driveway of the rear yard. If the driveway in the rear yard is located behind the garage, the garage setback shall be increased to twenty feet (20'). The driveway may be located adjacent to the garage on a concrete slab and shall have a depth of no less than twenty feet (20'). The tandem parking provided in the driveway shall be credited towards Owner's required number of parking spaces. 3.6 Garage/Carport Regulations. (i) Garages or carports shall be either attached or detached and accessible from a private alley. (ii) Carports, if any, shall be effectively screened from public rights -of way. 4. PARKING REQUIREMENTS The number of parking and loading spaces for Residential Condominiums and Residential Townhouse development areas shall be provided in accordance with the standards set TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 4 Exhibit "D" forth in Exhibit "F" to this agreement. The parking and loading requirements for all other uses shall be in accordance with the Code. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 5 Exhibit "D" EXHIBIT "E" DEVELOPMENT AREA "E" - OPEN SPACE CRITERIA AND STANDARDS Open Space is a tract of land provided as a general benefit for the community. The open space for Turtle Creek Village PUD, as shown on the attached Exhibit "K", comprises approximately thirty-five (35) acres, including the 100 -year flood plain. Common open space, as identified on the attached Exhibit "K", may be usable for recreational purposes or may provide visual, aesthetic and environmental amenities. 1. PERMITTED USES (a) Conservation areas (b) Outdoor recreational/athletic facilities (c) Outdoor swimming pools (d) Parks, playgrounds and playfields (e) Streams, lakes, waterways, or their drainageways (f) Wetlands (g) Club houses and community centers (h) Trail systems for pedestrian and bicycle traffic (i) Off-street parking 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2.1 Maximum height of buildings. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35'), exclusive of appurtenances. 2.2 Minimum Lot Size. The minimum Iot size shall be thirty-five hundred (3,500) square feet, except for landscaped lots in the right-of-way, which may be smaller, as approved as a part of the final plat. 2.3 Minimum Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be forty feet (40'). 2.4 Minimum Setbacks. (i) Front Yard. Fifteen feet (15'). (ii) Side Yard. Ten feet (10'). (iii) Rear Yard. Ten feet (10'). TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "E" 2.5 Linear Park. Linear parks shall generally be a minimum of forty feet (40') in width but in no event less than twenty-five feet (25') in width. 3. COMMON OPEN SPACE CONVEYANCE Common open space and structures thereon must be either: (i) conveyed to a public body, if said public body agrees to accept conveyance and to maintain the common open space and buildings, structures, or improvements which have been placed on it; or (ii) conveyed to a Property Owners Association or some other party responsible for maintaining common buildings, areas and land within the subdivision. The common open space shall be restricted to the uses specified on the final plat and which provide for the maintenance of the common open space in a manner which assures its long term maintenance for its intended purpose. 4. PARK LAND DEDICATION 4.1 Private Park Land. Owner will designate a minimum of 1.5 acres out of the Common Open Space, as shown on Exhibit "K", as private park land to be maintained by the Property Owners Association for the area. The private park land may contain open space improvements such as a swimming pool, amenity center and other related uses. In the event that Owner elects to change the location of the 1.5 acres to another location on the Property, which location shall be mutually agreed upon between Owner and the Director of Parks and Recreation Department, the revision shall be considered a minor change, as defined in Article III of this Agreement. 4.2 Park Land Dedication Requirements. Owner will dedicate not less than 15 acres out of the common Open Space to the City for the purpose of creating a pedestrian and bicycle trail within the Turtle Creek Village PUD. Owner will provide the City with a dedication deed for the public park land within 15 business days from the time a written request is received from the City's Director of Parks and Recreation Department. The City will maintain all dedicated public park land after the aforementioned conveyance by Owner. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "E" 43 Total Parkland Requirements. Owner shall provide a combined total acreage for private park and public park of no less than thirty-five (35) acres. 5. EASEMENTS WITHIN OPEN SPACE 5.1 Owner shall be permitted to locate a public utility easement within any area of public open space that abuts Owner's residential development. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Exhibit "E" EXHIBIT "F' PARKING REGULATIONS 1. PARKING REGULATIONS 1.1 Parking and Storage of Certain Vehicles. Automotive vehicles or trailers not bearing current license plates and state motor vehicles inspection stickers shall be parked or stored on any residential area only in completely enclosed buildings. No recreational vehicle, trailer or major recreational equipment shall be parked or stored on any lot except that it shall be enclosed in a building. No commercial vehicles larger than a standard three- quarter (3/4) ton pickup truck or standard two -axle passenger van shall be permitted to remain overnight on any Lot or to be parked on any roadway within the Property. 1.2 Single Family Detached Residential Parking Regulations. Development of any use permitted in the Single Family Detached Residential areas shall comply with Section 11.321 of the Code. 1.3 Residential Condominium Parking Regulations. (i) Development of any use permitted in the Residential Condominium development areas shall provide parking spaces equal to the following: a minimum of two parking spaces for up to two bedrooms and one additional space for units that contain three or more bedrooms, which shall be located either in a garage, on the driveway or in a convenient location to the building. Tandem parking spaces provided on the driveway shall be credited towards parking space requirements provided that the driveway is located directly in front of the garage of a dwelling unit and that driveway provides direct access to that dwelling unit from the garage. (ii) Residential Condominium development areas shall include garage parking for residents, which shall be accessible from private driveways or alleys. (iii) Additional parking shall also be provided for guests and visitors of residents. A minimum of five percent (5%) of the total parking spaces that are required for the condominium residences shall be provided for additional guest and visitor parking. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "F" 1.4 Residential Townhouse Parking Regulations Residential Townhouse development areas shall include covered parking (garage or carport) for residents, which shall be accessible from private alleys. Development of any use permitted on the Residential Townhouse development areas shall provide (i) a minimum of one (1) covered parking space per dwelling unit and (ii) one (1) additional parking space per dwelling unit, which may be located on the driveway behind or next to the garage or carport. Residential Townhouse units with three or more bedrooms shall provide one additional parking space at a location to be approved by the City Director of Planning. 1.5 Shared Parking. The City may approve as appropriate for two or more non-residential uses to share parking spaces. Any parking spaces that the City allows to be shared count toward the number of parking spaces each must provide. 1.6 Daycare Services and Primary Educational Facilities. Development of any use permitted for daycare and educational uses shall provide one parking space for each employee. 1.7 Open Space Parking Regulations Parking for open space uses is provided from adjacent on -street parking unless, at the Owner's option, off-street parking is provided within an open space lot. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "F" EXHIBIT "G" DAYCARE AND PRIMARY PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Any daycare or public educational facilities within the Turtle Creek Village PUD shall be in compliance with the Code_ TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "G" TURTLE CREEK PUD EXHIBIT "H" [See Attached Street Diagrams] Page 1 Exhibit "H" ternative Loca Street Tree U LE U 1L Residential Co a) 1— a� m oma o-� 0 co Residential Collector 0 CKV Median Tree Boulevard Collector 58' ROW A.W. Grimes Blvd. ROW Street Tree Street Tree (condition with 8' I jogging trail) I 5,1 Maximum berm with plant screening I ,,,.,-3 ft ht Barrier fence 20' FC-FC a'sidewalk 8,5 p 2.5' 8'sidewalk/Trail 15' Plantingstrip (by others) p (minimum) Access Lane (Fronting A.W. Grimes Blvd. with jogging trail) Sidewalk is part of the A.W. Grimes Blvd. improvements. This pavement Is the consolidated jogging trail/sidewalk. 0 A.W. Grimes Blvd. ROW Co o •-w 3 c o 'rn 0 o o L 0 0 D Co MM> E U 0 J Q c v U U � Q t -i-_ a) U Cl3 CL a) Q 0 -05 U 71- Q. O as Q Q O as 0 74-8c 0 T 0 coag 0 Hca o_ c o tL rr~nn� L vJ cci (1) V U 0 (n 0) N Ri CL Two-Way Alley w J J L1. I d eP!S LL y --I CO 0 OJ • O N C N_ ci 2 a) I O J u- ..+ o 0 c, ---1 i11") N O N - O N U N 2 it) I I ld aP!S N -14 bo • 1 V.. 7:11 CLI ?N yo em. z� 1.0 Q) O 0 0 c N a c -us c o _ o z p s pie/pis 0 v N c 0 U d) a) E ca 0) 0 c a) -o N i) O U U N W N 0 C m X N m p .0 C 0 m m U U m m N in c 1 1 o a) r cit 714 GO 73 0=— ��• 0 z.=fit. ld aP!S )pegias pieit apis swam! ,g VMS N N_ UL 090 O J O IAD 17 d 2 >oegtas apis Jouaaui ,q )oeg3as pies( epis laan ,ot. / 1 1 J a E to O U ...1... U C 0 CD 0 -0 to C to -0 U E o m co co in E in Xto to ion iio•.�/ /O. -o a) O Q W t6 Et v C9 CO #^j, 0 J CO LL W ) 0) LOT TYPE 'A' W J J a� > °'�; o°tee► tts'a r.45 1Ni o 8 y v� el .6 44 ° e z. o id eP!S pies( apis J174p311)! g )oeq;as apis Jouaiui ,g g y 0 ,Lai 2 v E L U Q U U to � M iz W 0 CO W v mo v , v ld 'P!S 1 LL i{oegias !Nett app ;aa4S .0L E t x v 0) (f) NTERIOR DRIVE ALLEY OR PRIVATE 0 O C Q) m 0, w c E X N C CO 0 c m i 0 0 N m 0 To ld aP!S 1) > 40 s., a w ca = o = tb 40 O= . N N co 2 0 8 • CI y° E O 9 0 _ Z • 5 z.= E i9 app .oua;ui ,g IU �_ ml E Y N >- c 0)cNI I mIE -a 0 Pas I � I -0_ 25m of - 5I o of to 1 U c a V m m o> am N — — E C) 0 CO 0 0 _J2/4 / >oeq;as pled ems pans AL %%/ , ,Z' A %/%� i. ///41/,%////'� / +��I`Etmu, vmpv 0) C STREET OR PEDESTRIAN WAY I R.O.W Street Tree 8.5' Street tree (plant in center of strip) Measured to face of curb Sidewalk Continuous planter strip Typical Planting Strip Exhibit "1" EXHIBIT J TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXH I BIT J 4 A Engineering Company TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Milburn Homes — Turtle Creek Village Williamson County, Texas kE°F7'1E4 at -�1'*.••i* . •.i* VC 1, I JAMES MICHAEL HEATH 1 I 7$13'1 -0..-<c Q30.i ;o,R;•.0./STE;.• �t Performed for: Milburn Homes 12554 Riata Vista Circle Second Floor Austin, TX 78727 by: Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 100 East Anderson Lane Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78752 Phone (512) 821-2081 FAX (512) 821-2085 April 20, 2001 Revised June 15,2001 Engineering Company Table of Contents List of Figures List of Tables Section One: Introduction Overview 1 1 Study Methodology 4 Roadway Level of Service 5 Section Two: Development Year - 2006 7 Background Traffic 7 Trip Generation 7 Trip Distribution 7 Area Roadway Facilities 7 Intersection Analysis 9 Section Three: Review of Proposed Geometric Design Standards 15 Roadway Traffic Volumes 15 Literature Review 16 Literature Review 17 Proposed Roadway Type 18 Section Four: Findings and Recommendations 21 Section Five: Certification Statement 22 References: 23 Appendix 37 Appendix A: Intersection Analysis Sheets Appendix B: Signal Warrant Analysis Sheets Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15,2001 Page i List of Figures Figure 1: Local Roadway Network 2 Figure 2: Site Trip Distribution 3 Figure 3: Intersection Locations on A.W Grimes 10 Figure 4: Future Conditions At Intersection 1 11 Figure 5: Future Conditions at A.W Grimes Blvd & Logan Dr 12 Figure 6: Future Conditions At Intersection 2 13 Figure 7: Future Conditions At Intersection 3 14 Figure 8: Daily Traffic on Development Roadways 16 Figure 9: Public Circulation Plan 20 List of Tables Table 1: Land Use Summary 1 Table 2: LOS Criteria for Roadway Arterials1 5 Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections (1) 6 Table 4: LOS Criteria for Two -Way Stop Controlled Intersections (1) 6 Table 5: Site Generated Trips 8 Table 6: Year 2006 Levels of Service 9 Table 7: Community Street Width Standards 17 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15,2001 Page ii MILBURN HOME SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS June 15, 2001 Section One: Introduction Overview The Turtle Creek Village Planned Unit Development is located in southeast Williamson County, within the limits of the City of Round Rock. It is proposed as a Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), with the land uses listed in Table 1. Generally described, the site is located north of the Gattis School Road, south of Highway 79, east of Green Lawn Blvd, and west of South Creek. Access to the development will be along the proposed A.W. Grimes Blvd which will run through the site. It is anticipated that the site will be fully developed by 2006. Projected traffic volumes are based on information taken from traffic counts performed on August 15, 2000. Proposed land uses are provided in Table 1. Table 1: Land Use Summary Size Land Use 422 Dwellings Single Family Homes 273 Dwelling Units Single Family Attached Homes 250 Students Day Care Facility 800 Student Elementary Figure 1 shows the location of the Milburn Home Subdivision and the surrounding roadway network. Other than the completion of A.W Grimes Blvd, the roadway network surrounding this site is not expected to significantly change from the time of this study to the build -out completion date; therefore, the build -out year analysis will assume the existing network with modifications to include the subdivision and A.W Grimes Blvd. The trips generated by this site are distributed according to driveway accessibility as shown in Figure 2. One of the primary goals of Milburn Homes is to design a Traditional Neighborhood Development that incorporates mixed residential areas and civic areas. The Turtle Creek Village TND includes single family detached housing, single family attached housing, an elementary school, a daycare center, and public space. One of the major goals of a TND is to be pedestrian oriented. To accomplish this goal, street pattern and design is used to reduce vehicle travel speeds and encourage pedestrian activity. Streets may be smaller than in conventional development and more varied in size and form to control traffic and give character to the neighborhood. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 1 The projected traffic along the roadway segments in the development was analyzed to determine the roadway size needed to serve vehicle traffic and encourage pedestrian activity. In addition, the intersections along A.W Grimes Blvd within the subdivision were analyzed to determine operating Level of Service (LOS), and recommend improvements so that these intersections operate at an acceptable LOS. Figure 1: Local Roadway Network Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 2 Figure 2: Site Trip Distribution Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 3 Study Methodology The following information provides a summary of the field data and technical analysis used for this Traffic Impact Study. The methodology is based upon a thorough analysis of existing and projected site -generated traffic on area roadways. The study methodology is as follows: 1. Review the proposed land use information for this site with Milburn Homes representatives. 2. Using the Williamson County Long Range Travel Demand Model, obtain 2006 Daily traffic volumes and Peak hour traffic volume projections for the AM and PM period on A.W. Grimes Boulevard between Highway 79 and Gattis School Road. 3. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (11E) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, estimate site trip generation for the AM and PM Peak traffic periods for the Milburn Home Subdivision. 4. Using Aerial Photographs and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, estimate site trip generation for the development adjacent to Milburn Home Subdivision that will be using the site as access to A.W. Grimes Blvd. 5. Develop trip distribution percentage factors for the Milburn Home site based on the Williamson County Long Range Travel Demand Model and proposed site access points. 6. Distribute traffic generated by the Milburn Home site onto area roadways using the above noted trip distribution factors. 7. Analyze the four intersection access points along A.W. Grimes using the methodology found in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209, 1994 ed. (1): 8. Formulate improvement recommendations, if required, for access to the site. 9. Calculate the vehicular traffic along all the roadway segments in the site. 10. Determine the residential street type and width for each roadway segment 11. Review the proposed circulation plan to determine if the proposed roadway cross sections are adequate to serve projected traffic volumes. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 4 Roadway Level of Service The 1997 Highway Capacity Manual, (1) uses Level of Service (LOS) as the method by which the quality of traffic flow is described. LOS describes operational conditions in six levels based upon speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. These six levels are given the letters "A" through "F" and are given different descriptions and defining criteria depending on the roadway element analyzed. The roadway elements within the study area include arterial roadways, signalized intersections, and stop -controlled intersections. Table 2 presents the criteria used to identify arterial roadway LOS. Arterial LOS is based on the average travel speed in miles per hour. Arterial LOS is further subdivided based on the classification of the arterial analyzed. Thus large arterials, with higher posted speed limits, are expected to have higher speeds and the LOS criteria are defined accordingly. Table 2: LOS Criteria for Roadway Arterials' LOS "A" represents free flow conditions. Drivers travel at desired speed and are virtually unaffected by other vehicles. With LOS "B", other vehicles in the traffic stream become noticeable. Under LOS "C", the traffic stream significantly affects a driver's behavior. LOS "D" represents high-density traffic flow where speed and maneuverability are severely restricted and poor levels of comfort and convenience are experienced. LOS "E" generally describes a traffic stream at capacity where traffic is flowing but at a very slow rate, and any additional vehicles or unusual conditions will cause the system to break down. LOS "F" depicts a breakdown state where stop and go conditions and excessive queues form. LOS criteria for traffic signals are based on the average control delay per vehicle. Control delay includes deceleration and acceleration delay, queue move -up time, and stopped delay. These criteria are shown in Table 3. Thus, if the average control delay for vehicles at an intersection is fifty five seconds or less, the intersection is defined as operating at a LOS "D" or better. Stopped delay of fifty five through eighty seconds represent LOS "E" and values greater than eighty seconds define LOS "F". Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 5 Arterial Classifcation I II III IV Range of free-flow speeds (mph) 45 to 55 35 to 45 30 to 35 25 to 35 Typical free-flow speeds (mph) 50 40 33 30 Level of Service Average Travel Speed (MPH) A 42 35 30 25 B 34 28 24 19 C 27 22 18 13 D 21 17 14 9 E 16 13 10 7 F <16 <13 <10 <7 LOS "A" represents free flow conditions. Drivers travel at desired speed and are virtually unaffected by other vehicles. With LOS "B", other vehicles in the traffic stream become noticeable. Under LOS "C", the traffic stream significantly affects a driver's behavior. LOS "D" represents high-density traffic flow where speed and maneuverability are severely restricted and poor levels of comfort and convenience are experienced. LOS "E" generally describes a traffic stream at capacity where traffic is flowing but at a very slow rate, and any additional vehicles or unusual conditions will cause the system to break down. LOS "F" depicts a breakdown state where stop and go conditions and excessive queues form. LOS criteria for traffic signals are based on the average control delay per vehicle. Control delay includes deceleration and acceleration delay, queue move -up time, and stopped delay. These criteria are shown in Table 3. Thus, if the average control delay for vehicles at an intersection is fifty five seconds or less, the intersection is defined as operating at a LOS "D" or better. Stopped delay of fifty five through eighty seconds represent LOS "E" and values greater than eighty seconds define LOS "F". Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 5 For signalized intersection operation, LOS "A" represents very low delay; most vehicles do not stop at all. With LOS "B", more vehicles stop than LOS "A", increasing the average delay. Under LOS "C", the number of vehicles stopping is significant; however, many still pass through the intersection without stopping. LOS "D" describes conditions where congestion is readily apparent with many vehicles stopping and individual cycle failures (i.e., not all vehicles waiting in the intersection queue are able to get through the intersection on the first green indication) are noticeable. LOS "E" generally describes operations with poor progression, long cycle lengths and frequent cycle failures. LOS "F" describes unacceptable operations which include many cycle failures caused by arrival flows rates exceeding intersection capacity. Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections (1) Level of Service Average Control Delay (sec./veil) A <10 B B >10 and < 20 C >20 and < 35 D >35 and < 55 E >55 and < 80 F >80 Stop controlled intersections are analyzed in a similar manner; however, LOS is based on total delay per vehicle. The values that define LOS, shown in Table 4, are more restrictive than those for signalized intersections because it is assumed that drivers stopped at signalized intersections are able to relax while drivers waiting at stop signs must remain alert and continue to move ahead in the queue. Total delay includes both stopped delay and time spent in the queue waiting to enter the intersection. Two-way stop controlled intersections with the minor street average total delay greater than thirty seconds identifies LOS "E" or worse. Table 4. LOS Criteria for Two -Way Stop Controlled Intersections (1) Level of Service Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A <10 B >l0and<15 C >15 and < 25 D >25 and < 35 E >35and<50 F >50 For this study, the criteria for minimum acceptable traffic conditions is Level of Service "D". Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 6 Section Two: Development Year - 2006 A technical approach for simulating future travel demand was utilized in evaluating the roadway system in and around the Milburn Home Subdivision. Information used to develop the projection of future traffic for this area is documented in the following sections of the report. Background Traffic Projected traffic volumes using the roadway system without the proposed project are commonly called background traffic volumes. For the Milburn Home Subdivision, projected background traffic along A. W Grimes is based upon the Williamson County Traffic Model. Background traffic for the adjacent subdivisions that will use the roads of the Turtle Creek Village TND is based on aerial photography and model outputs to determine land use and the ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 6th edition (2) to determine trip generation Trip Generation Trip generation for the Milburn Home Subdivision site was calculated from information contained in ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 6th edition (2). The number of trips generated is estimated using historical data from existing similar land uses. The trips generated for the Milburn Home Subdivision are shown in Table 5. Trip Distribution Trip distribution takes into account where vehicles using the site are going to or coming from based on the roadway network. External distribution percentages were arrived at by analyzing the projected background traffic volumes along A.W. Grimes Blvd. Internal distributions were arrived at by analyzing the physical layout of the subdivision and geometric characteristics of the roadway All future site traffic was then distributed using the determined percentages. The percentages shown in Figure 2 were applied to the site generated traffic for the year 2006. Area Roadway Facilities A.W. Grimes Blvd. The 2025 Austin Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan recommends a six lane Major Divided Arterial. The 2007 Round Rock Road Plan plans for A.W. Grimes Blvd to be initially constructed as a two lane cross section. As the build -out year coincides with the Round Rock roadway plan, the two lane cross-section is used in this analysis. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 7 Table 5: Site Generated Trips ITE CODE ITE DESCRIPTION UNITS UNADJUSTED TRIPS 24 HOUR AM PEAK PM PEAK TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT 210 Single Family Housing 421 DU 4,063 2,032 2,032 318 80 239 429 274 154 230 Residential Condominiums 273 OCC.DU 1,796 899 899 141 24 117 169 113 56 520 Elementary School 800 Students 770 385 385 232 137 95 0 0 0 565 Day Care Center 250 Students 1,130 565 565 185 98 87 188 88 100 7,759 3,881 3,881 876 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 339 538 786 475 310 June 15, 2001 Page 8 Intersection Analysis This study analyzes four intersections along A.W Grimes (Figure 3): 1. A.W. Grimes & Intersection 1 2. A.W. Grimes & Logan Dr 3. A.W. Grimes & Intersection 3 4. A.W. Grimes & Intersection 4 The results of the intersection analysis are presented in Table 6. The geometry of these intersections are shown in Figures 4 through 8. The worksheets from this analysis are included in the Appendix A. The signal warrant analysis worksheets for the signalized intersections are included in Appendix B. Table 6: Year 2006 Levels of Service Intersection Type of Intersection Control Level of Service AM Peak PM Peak A.W Grimes & Intersection 1 Signalized B A A.W Grimes & Logan Dr Signalized A A A.W Grimes & Intersection 2 Unsignalized A A A.W Grimes & Intersection 3 Signalized C A All of the intersections studied operate at an acceptable Level of Service with the geometries and traffic control shown in Figures 4 through 7. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 9 86) 0 Or1116�r1100jg Or6�;)6)61 ,18 OI �80 6 8 c�1 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES C A B c Ac D D LEGEND; OVERALL LOS; C AM PEAK A PM PEAK X(X)X AM BACKGROUND(SITE)TOTAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGROUND(SITE)TOTAL 'IGLRHI A.W. Grimes Blvd & STREET 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS 912217)1129 4 467 (10)607 400) 40 128(23)151°(1-1-)11- 0(2828 0(1212 0(1)1 0(1)1 0(3535 0(18)18 31. 'i, J LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES D c Dom' B AE k_D D • D LEGEND: 77 (14)91 9-2- S )161 Logo 429)51 008)8 � 170( 35)205 0(38)38 3011377438 837 01(39)1037 OVERALL LDS: B AM PEAK C PM PEAK XCX)X AM BACKGRDUND(SITE)TDTAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGROUND(SITE)TOTAL I L -Oi; 5 A.W. Grimes Blvd & Logan St 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS 104 (198)12.4 467(127)594 0C4� i O(30)30 Ai Street 0(54)54 0( 33)33 --y. LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES AA71. t A A 3 q.3(146)489 007(2_34)1241 07( 34)1241 LEGEND: OVERALL LOS: C AM PEAK A PM PEAK X(X)X AM BACKGROUND(SITE)TOTAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGROUND(SITE)TOTAL -fit 1 6 A.W. Grimes Blvd & STREET 2 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS 1046(205)1251 467(129)596 OC4)4 0(4 3 0(19)19 0 1t 2)12 15(13)28 ) \f L. Y.' 10(9)19 �a A 0(12)13 2(9)11 4t4)8 0(85)85 0(42)42 0(4)4 0(3)3 0(54)54 0(33)33 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES A A EA B Street 3 0(145 )1 5 0(63)63 19(17)36 343(49)392 1007(185)1192 5(4)9 LEGEND OVERALL LOS; D AM PEAK B PM PEAK XCX)X AM BACKGROUND(SITE)TOTAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGROUND(SITE)TOTAL 1 RE7 A.W. Grimes Blvd & STREET 3 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS Section Three: Review of Proposed Geometric Design Standards The Public Circulation Plan provided to Alliance -Texas Engineering Comapny included the proposed residential street types and right of way allocation. This plan was reviewed to determine if the roadway widths were adequate for the type and amount of daily traffic on each roadway segment. The review of the development plan included the following. 1. Determine the twenty four (24) hour traffic volume on all roadway segments, 2. Review literature to determine minimum roadway widths, 3. Review proposed street type widths and classifications, and 4. Recommend roadway pavement widths. Roadway Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes on each roadway segment are based on the traffic generated by the TND and the background traffic calculated in the Intersection Analysis Section of the report. For this analysis, the 24 hour volume was used as the primary criteria to determine roadway classification and roadway width. The AM & PM peak period volumes were examined to ensure adequate roadway capacity during peak periods. Roadway size is typically based on functional classification and traffic volumes. Local residential roads primarily serve two major functions: providing access and conveying traffic. In designing roadways for these two functions, pavement widths have generally been over designed as a means to efficiently move vehicles. Unfortunately, high speeds and high traffic volumes often occur as a result. The high speeds and volumes typically run contrary to what residents along the roads desire. Roadway widths in Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TNDs) tend to be narrower than in typical developments with the goal of reducing travel speeds and traffic volumes. As a result, pedestrian activity is encouraged. Site traffic was distributed over the roadway network based on the site layout. In addition to site traffic, traffic from adjacent subdivisions may use the roads in The Lake Creek TND as a means to get to A.W. Grimes Boulevard. The two roads in the TND that will connect to the adjacent subdivisions are Willow Dr and Logan Drive. In addition to site traffic, it is anticipated that approximately 2,500 vehicles per day will use Willow Drive as a cut through route to A.W. Grimes Blvd. Additionally, approximately 4,700 vehicles per day will use Logan Drive to access A.W Grimes Boulevard. The traffic volumes on most of the roadway segments in the TND are shown in Figure 8. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 15 Section Three: Review of Proposed Geometric Design Standards The Public Circulation Plan provided to Alliance -Texas Engineering Comapny included the proposed residential street types and right of way allocation. This plan was reviewed to determine if the roadway widths were adequate for the type and amount of daily traffic on each roadway segment. The review of the development plan included the following. 1. Determine the twenty four (24) hour traffic volume on all roadway segments, 2. Review literature to determine minimum roadway widths, 3. Review proposed street type widths and classifications, and 4. Recommend roadway pavement widths. Roadway Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes on each roadway segment are based on the traffic generated by the TND and the background traffic calculated in the Intersection Analysis Section of the report. For this analysis, the 24 hour volume was used as the primary criteria to determine roadway classification and roadway width. The AM & PM peak period volumes were examined to ensure adequate roadway capacity during peak periods. Roadway size is typically based on functional classification and traffic volumes. Local residential roads primarily serve two major functions: providing access and conveying traffic. In designing roadways for these two functions, pavement widths have generally been over designed as a means to efficiently move vehicles. Unfortunately, high speeds and high traffic volumes often occur as a result. The high speeds and volumes typically run contrary to what residents along the roads desire. Roadway widths in Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TNDs) tend to be narrower than in typical developments with the goal of reducing travel speeds and traffic volumes. As a result, pedestrian activity is encouraged. Site traffic was distributed over the roadway network based on the site layout. In addition to site traffic, traffic from adjacent subdivisions may use the roads in The Turtle Creek Village TND as a means to get to A.W. Grimes Boulevard. The two roads in the TND that will connect to the adjacent subdivisions are Willow Dr and Logan Drive. In addition to site traffic, it is anticipated that approximately 2,500 vehicles per day will use Willow Drive as a cut through route to A.W. Grimes Blvd. Additionally, approximately 4,700 vehicles per day will use Logan Drive to access A.W Grimes Boulevard. The traffic volumes on most of the roadway segments in the TND are shown in Figure 8. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 15 Figure 8: Daily Traffic on Development Roadways Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 16 Literature Review Recently many communities throughout the country have adopted reduced street width standards. A review of these standards was undertaken to determine the minimum pavement width acceptable to various communities through out the country. Residential Street widths for a number of communities are list below in Table 7. This data has been compiled from "The Congress For The New Urbanism," Transportation Task Force Initiative. As Table 7 illustrates, numerous communities have adopted street width standards of 20-21' with parking on one side and 24-28' with parking on both sides. Table 7: Community Street Width Standards State Jurisdiction Standard Arizona Phoenix 28' — Parking both sides California Santa Rosa 26' parking One Side 20' No Parking Novata 24' — Parking Both Sides Delaware Delaware DOT 21' — Parking One Side — Local St 22' parking One Side —Minor Col. Maryland Howard and Charles Co. 24' Parking Unregulated Michigan Birmingham 26' Parking Both Sides 20' Parking One Side Oregon Eugene 12' One Way Alley 16' Two Way Alley Portland 26' Parking Both Sides 20' Parking One Side Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 17 Proposed Roadway Type A proposed Public Circulation Plan was provided for review (Figure 9). A review of the circulation plan, literature review, and the 24 hour traffic on each of the road segments indicates that the roadway facilities proposed are adequately sized for the traffic projected. Below is a list of the proposed roadway types and a brief description of each. Standard Residential Collector, (65' ROW) The proposed standard residential collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, in sixty five feet (65') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. As with the alternative residential collector, the stall depth and travel lane width should be increased to eight feet (8') and twelve feet (12'), respectively. Boulevard Collector (74' ROW) The proposed Boulevard Collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, and a median of at least nine feet (9') in width, in seventy four feet (74') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parallel parking is provided on both sides of the street Alternative Residential Collector (59' ROW) The proposed alternative residential collector cross section includes thirty four feet (34') of traveled way, with onsite parallel parking, in fifty nine feet (59') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Using the information presented in Residential Streets (ULI, ASCE, NAHB 1990), we would recommend a stall depth of eight feet (8') and a travel lane width of nine feet (9') to accommodate the needs on this street. Local Street (55' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes thirty feet (30') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty five feet (55') aright of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 18 Alternative Local Street (52' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes twenty seven feet (27') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty feet of right of way. Design speed is twenty (20) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Access Street (45' R.O.W to 58' ROW )(One -Way) The proposed Access Street cross section includes twenty feet (20') of traveled way with parallel parking, in forty feet (45'-58') of right of way. Design speed is fifteen (15) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five feet (5'). Parallel parking is allowed on one side of the street in the traveled way. It is recommended that the Access Street have parking restricted to one side of the road. Two Way Alley (20' Access Easement) The proposed Access Street cross section includes sixteen feet (16') of traveled way with parking prohibited, in twenty feet (20') of the access easement. Design speed is five (5) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five feet (5'). On street parking is prohibited in the traveled way. The traveled way should be kept clear at all times. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 19 Proposed Roadway Type A proposed Public Circulation Plan was provided for review (Figure 9). A review of the circulation plan, literature review, and the 24 hour traffic on each of the road segments indicates that the roadway facilities proposed are adequately sized for the traffic projected. Below is a list of the proposed roadway types and a brief description of each. Standard Residential Collector, (65' ROW) The proposed standard residential collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, in sixty five feet (65') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. As with the alternative residential collector, the stall depth and travel lane width should be increased to eight feet (8') and twelve feet (12'), respectively. Boulevard Collector (74' ROW) The proposed Boulevard Collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, and a median of at least nine feet (9') in width, in seventy four feet (74') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parallel parking is provided on both sides of the street Alternative Residential Collector (59' ROW) The proposed alternative residential collector cross section includes thirty four feet (34') of traveled way, with onsite parallel parking, in fifty nine feet (59') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Using the information presented in Residential Streets (ULI, ASCE, NAHB 1990), we would recommend a stall depth of seven feet (7') and a travel lane width of ten feet (10') to accommodate the needs on this street. Local Street (55' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes thirty feet (30') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty five feet (55') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 18 Alternative Local Street (52' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes twenty seven feet (27') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty feet aright of way. Design speed is twenty (20) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Access Street (45' R.O.W to 58' ROW )(One -Way) The proposed Access Street cross section includes twenty feet (20') of traveled way with parallel parking, in forty feet (45'-58') of right of way. Design speed is fifteen (15) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five feet (5'). Parallel parking is allowed on one side of the street in the traveled way. It is recommended that the Access Street have parking restricted to one side of the road. Two Way Alley (20' Access Easement) The proposed Access Street cross section includes sixteen feet (16') of traveled way with parking prohibited, in twenty feet (20') of the access easement. Design speed is five (5) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five (5'). On street parking is prohibited in the traveled way. The traveled way should be kept clear at all times. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 19 Figure 9: Public Circulation Plan it- SS "z lar 011a I° V 11," #1D �C�iS401: O Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 20 Section Four: Findings and Recommendations The proposed Turtle Creek Village TND and its interaction with the surrounding roadway network has been evaluated in this study. The five intersections along A.W. Grime have been analyzed to determine the Level of Service (LOS) and identify improvements necessary for these intersections to operate at an acceptable LOS. Additionally, the roadway segments were analyzed to determine the appropriate pavement width for each roadway segment in the development. A listing of all the improvements necessary is provided in the section below: Geometric Improvements (Year 2006) 1. Left Turn Bays recommended on A.W. Grimes Blvd at all intersections where left turns are permitted 2. All side streets on A.W. Grimes Blvd should have separate right turn bays to separate right turning vehicles from thru and left turning vehicles The following traffic control improvements are necessary for the intersections to operate at an acceptable LOS: 1. Signalize the intersection of A.W Grimes & Street 1 2. Signalize the intersection of A.W Grimes & Logan Dr. 3. Signalize the intersection of A.W Grimes & Street 5 The Circulation Plan provided to Alliance -Texas Engineering Company for review was analyzed to determine if the proposed residential street types were adequate for the developments traffic volumes. Additionally, a literature review was performed to determine the minimum pavement widths of various street types in use nationally. The analysis shows that the proposed residential street types are adequate for the traffic using these facilities. Following is a listing of the street types to be used in this development and the right of way and pavement width associated with each. • Alternative Residential Collector (59' ROW) — 34' Pavement • Standard Residential Collector, (65' ROW) — 40' Pavement • Boulevard Collector (74' ROW) - 40' Pavement • Standard Local Street (55' ROW) — 27 ` Pavement • Alternative Local Street (52' ROW) — 30 ` Pavement • Access Street (45' to 58' ROW) — 20 ` Pavement • Two Way Alley (20' ROW) — 16" Pavement Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 21 Section Five: Certification Statement I hereby certify that this report complies with applicable technical requirements of the City of Round Rock and is complete to the best of my knowledge. Alliance -Texas Engineering Company ich H:.th, P.E. Principal Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 22 References: 1. Highway Capacity Manual, (SR 209), Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1994. 2. Trip Generation, An Informal Report. 5th. Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C., January 1991. 3. "Synchro 5.0 ", Trafficware, 2001. 4. Austin Metropolitan Area Roadway Plan", Austin Transportation Study, December, 1994. 5. "Congress For The New Urbanism", Transportation Task Force Initiative, June 2000 6. Residential Streets, ASCE, NAHB, ULI, 1990 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 23 Appendix Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 k ; 1_1 f L. Appendix A: Intersection Analysis Sheets Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company AM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Street 5 & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 4. f2T"Wii-okts:25s411,14:24,17:ClizititiSilaca'aitiDadziwAck;t11.5t'1,:.Sf-3-<2i.,4, Lane Configurations fdr 7tifejr Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 OS r -w ...a '2 -ft: ftft,aft, : -,' 'thiMX.m Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1583 - - I nalrg pr .„, ,...k. --0,-!,- -4 .,hihallfiror:-IA, ft 4., Satd. Flow (perm) 1312 1583 ''' ' A 4.:. - gakt Firtf: 40101r 31- 1.1121y$ 7---- h 4 .,..1 • Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Xiba.- ..• r Lane Group How (vph) Protected Phases Actuated Green, Green, G (s) Actuated g/G Ratio rAz gt,Y - - • Vehicle Extension (s) Raa 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1799 1583 1770 1856 1271 1583 111 1856 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 "11# .4e 13 158 436 ,,,ji„, ' 1640 de2, lf.24 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 8.0 8.0 (16 4/.0.,p3M 0.10 0.10 4 Saft.....f.-.:•1 3.0 3.0 2,4 8.0 8.0 71.0 66.0 0.10 0.10 0.81 0.74 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 .4.6senwar" , 1 *lx 6 63.0 62.0 0.72 0./0 3.0 3.0 Ids Ratio Prot v/c Ratio 111„ Progression Factor 1:411440§1 Delay (s) owl" ays 0.73 0.37 1.00 1.00 58.3 39.3 Olp 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 : . 4a, 39.2 37.0 61.1 4.4 1.28 0.77 640 3. 4.5 56.3 Approach Delay ' • Y.,'",t -104, • re, Pto..a.ft hf*--ha• • 4-..7 • 11 %PIP HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 .44 Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.14 ICU Level of Service AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 1 -ICM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Street 4 & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 t 6;,:5Z '415' V:-VaPAPraingtiv 0,93'409c:PYTA;41;1&-;*inNii4f-44:16:1AIVRair 4-0.***go Lane Configurations c. Grade 41C4`.4.'1 Peak Hour Factor -SW2d. Pedestrians kV& -.1140 Walking Speed (ft/s tifire103 Right tum flare (veh) 14411t-,- 0% 0 % 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 *". •.•;•-fr AA, Median storage veh) vC1, stage 1 conf vol 41,217077, tC, single (s) tF (s) !tio. V A • ,••, cM capacity (veh/h) 6.4 3.5 6.2 = ,ror 3.3 4.1 2.2 75 177 487 44, Egfb Z,••••,, :frt• ' nf-•• • 40„ :•U 0.4 Axle' 11 4 " l'a4a4a. — tee. IC. .t;.,:a • r, 914:EMILaaigatilUMtillatiiii&CRIZNIVAUiliaMliiittagiatIMUSZINETta Queue Length (ft) att Wan. „ Lane LOS 41"40. 'frit441 Approach LOS '44,14.• zok I a 34 $4se Ats„ 0:44, , • 'fr'aaa•4' •• •, 94; fr &'.44,M440 1011441, ‘,4==M 2494,1="4,o, • • tt. • • !Pt of- e4k,a :41ft.' • Average Delay ef" ty-4. 11 4 , • ›." 2 1.0 4raf0:1'• 2 .t,tte •r•fr ar,pafr,4,ar 'a•vav- fr • t.e4+1,.. • AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Logan & AWGRIMES -,L 4/16/2001 Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt MAW 444 Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow (perm) - r,4 •-• tcs oz.e 4.0 4.0 4.0 �4 4 64'1 se' 1.00 0.85 1.00 ;;•141$. 1777 1583 1770 1777 1583 1. 0.43m4M;o4,*o„. 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.85 1.00 0.98 • • 1583 1770 1834 4;44 1373 1583 127 1834 4.0 4.0 .00 1.00 1770 1862 1 776 1862 Peak -hour factor, PFIF 0.92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0.92 0.92 fAtte 31 38 'Two • ,-.4500;-.m.g • 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 • 175 Protected Phases 0. a fie Actuated Green, G 441.M.4** -34 Actuated g/C Ratio 700W -MP ?-7 Vehicle Extension (s) v/s Ratio Prot s) ogZ 14.4 14.4 14.4 .01,V1.4.1/II V rift vlc Ratio •ff!' fi - Progression Factor •17r4 rb Delay Approach Delay (s) .V • ,"0",,! 0'4 0.17 0.17 0.17 3.0 3.0 3.0 47,41,Tewaar,.- , 157 9 531 5 112:41k 42‘ Ag. ,r,st 14.4 58.6 57.6 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 43 1229 0.17 0.67 0.65 3.0 3.0 3.0 •‘4,4,,t.•4' 3.0 59.6 .„...ess* 0:11" • 0.04 0.67 ,u-40 3.0 3.0 , . 0.10 0.14 0.74 :alvorY :tows 1.00 1.00 1.00 riwi 31.6 31.9 47.5 . 4. 31.8 VA .71Fgr7 , ak4e 42.7 11° ';v•,` ,'• 0.00 0.29 0.58 0.07 0.44 1.00 0.81 37.3 19.0 fT- . - ext: • c0.02 c0.66 ,144 1,7 0.54 0.98 0.85 1.26 0.66 Mir ‘41,1, 7.7 57.7 25.1 7.9 .1. V. • . • 474 26.2 4,tt-titfitliAtintz,;; HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 44,4 st! Intersection Capacity Utilization rl,r4tAirtt Vtgitgi , 'tag? 0.89 ft$4,1 87.7% ICU Level of Service Arfi Aorn .4,4•Mt •04 AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Street 2 & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 Lane Configurations ifAMT , Total Lost time Frt W7. Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow (perm) 010, 1111 : Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Warler ' 74: ., Lane GroupFlow (vph) - 7,- 4.0 4.0 "4:6 "4.0 4.1 e':111101f0 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 Aft 1781 1583 1086 1583 L 1779 1583 1770 1845 AO; gegarMk. . 1265 1583 156 1845 • ',1,-41 1.00 1.00 1770 1858 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuaied' g/C Rail° 0 MANY -M,APAr "rw' N.,6:4w4"48m,aismq",‘ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 lair 1:T; ff; 82 96 124 107 0.92 0.92 33 - 33 6000 664 1858 0.92 0.92 1141,4314P 14-ziom*.-4.42„ 0.92 0.92 33 1085 4441, Vehicle Extension (s) 13.2 13.2 0.16 0.16 3.0 3.0 t.4• r-ga7 5 13.2 13.2 61.8 58.8 0.16 0.16 0.71 0.66'z 3.0 v/s Ratio Prot .6412-1". v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 000 414,' 0.48 0.38 1.00 1.00 42. 36.6 35.0 35.7 " • •, • . 3.0 3.0 c0.01 0.33 3.0 6 aliq REM' . 61.8 58.8 6.71 Stra- 0.66 3.0 3.0 0.62 0.43 0.18 0.49 00 1.00 1.00 1.48 1.16 41.0 35.4 21.6 10.0 0000 ,Tgigze9,4 10.6 Ai& 101342.16)..4 11,01r5: 0.00 c0.58 0.06 0.88 1.00 1.00 At, 4.7 21.2 0000 20.7 AZ.f°,41 000 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio E = Intersection Capacity Utilization 401111;,1:, - 0.80 80.0% ".,s • grt, • , ICU Level of Service • et. AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 PM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Street 5 & A.W. GRIMES Lane Configurations reK 1111-41 Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow (prat) Thw Satd. Flow (perm ,a. 6431' 1.00 0.85 AO' 1779 1583 1336' 1583 e,o• fS 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1800 1583 1770 1855 -5rf:ole 1426 1583 588 1855 • 0•14,',1§. 1.00 1.00 1770 1854 117 1854 Peak -hour factor, PHF lory Lane Group Flow (vph) ow r0',W,V: Protected Phases -wpm Actuated Green, G (s) #A4:14w3.7.74tA ".„ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Actuated g/C Ratio • '11•T•r--- Vehicle Extension (s) *X v/s Ratio Prot „ - v/c Ratio rr - Progression Factor Delay (s) "". Approach Delay s) 7.4 7.4 0.09 0.09 gar 3.0 3.0 .4"1"" ••• 7.4 7.4 71.5 66.4 63.7 62.5 - „ 0.09 0.09 0.82 0:75 3.0 fi4 14.10sNE 1:444 •:-"00. ,0:00 0.39 0.24 1.00 1.00 40.4 38.7 39.7 '3 0 W11.7 ork. ' 7 • •••.' 3.0 3.0 '" • -..v4IS C0.01 .60.72 8 01 41, 0.23 0.05 0.12 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 414, 38.7 37.3 3.1 26.6 38.4 25.5 0.73 § 3.0 0.71 3.0 :41P10"'; 0.00 0.36 4-90 0.10 0.51 . 0.83 0.77 18.3 6.0 6.2 s.,...,_Maattatiltia;ialAaatrAJitgiimESAEVNAUgMVVIV_Kti;V PZ1 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio • - Intersection Capacity Utilization •-ekW W•-• 0.88 irlfmaloo ICU Level of Service PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignatized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Street 4 & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 Lane Configurations Grade vale - 4 4,444 Peak Hour Factor Walking Speed (ft/s Right tum flare (veh 0% 0% 0% 44' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0;92 0.74„, . T.! • .gaz Median storage veh „.4444.444446 VC 1, stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) .7i1Pft =t7, *:17- tF (s) zgo 044ts, cM capacity (veh/h) Sz. • • •'4.• • "4 Volume Left cSH Queue Length (ft) t4, 6.4 3.5 6.2 3.3 4.1 2.2 66 468 921 4.444:e Ole 0 4 • ,044 te i4t 468 1700 1700 14.;..4 OpNfiVW,Artttf.Wfl • is.f • -A.' 4tteimelit Vie 11 A4, 4 SW 1FX • '41V1,14 5,g 44'4 ^3:44 1 44544 Lane LOS •P' pog- Approach LOS 4.4 MiiiiiKialtaMtEtilii4-D Average Delay 0.2 Ta4; 4,'"44" '4444 • PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Logan St & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 '4,5-At-Hiit.tittzttafit13.kt'k-Qtitid=-,m.t,L.,_d21,E,4:1'atz.,-:4seEttaiAi,3'-*f:altitiv,azatittana Lane Configurations ,n6f 666146: - Total Lost time (s) - - Frt Satd. Flow (prof) Satd. Flow (perm) 1.00 0.85 1780 1583 300- 0,f 441 P. -At e -P -M 1363 1583 4".6 4.0 4.0 4.0 "AI 9, 0 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1770 1583 1770 1817 TPA' :1712 1394 1583 641 1817 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 FK1 7 Lane Group Flow (vph) Protected Phases 0.92 0g. 0.92 0.92 1.06 1.00 iiir 1770 1858 •666 V 7 -. 00- 4 117 1858 '3000a14200 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 JIV1111.; 115 99 41 1350 0 164 672 Actuated Green, G (s) - A - • 'X, Actuated g/C Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 63.5 60.5 67.5 62.5 0011c,,,,z 0.12 0.12 0.73 0.68 0.77 0.71 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.12 0.12 APA'A - 41:1043 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ..2#111H. vis Ratio Prot v/c Ratio 30.0 Progression Factor riT Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 3 ty.,6a it 71* &440, ,9439, 4.3% "d•-‘1^ )1 2.1"41"..‘Cant; 0.09 0.11 0.71 0.54 1.00 1.00 35.7 35.8 j'•;53 35.8 "4- ,7* -1/- 1.00 1.00 51.3 40.4 EsX 46.2 0,07,0 0.00 c0.74 644e- 0:08 1.09 1.18 0.72 N11100,'1, 4.7 57.3 55.8 -y tAP • ,t -PI 9 c0.05 0.36 0.82 0.51 1.00 1.00 65.1 7.5 18.8 pr, 019 • • • •4*.," HCM Volume to Capacity ratio *141.1.*Mir Intersection Capacity Utilization •.•• MO' 1.07 ft; C AP`44.3' 105.0% gir36--; .,00.174,1* ,..,4Avxo, 4 t`,Pfr 6 ICU Level of Service "FM 7 • ,1 ": a, PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Street 2 & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 :;;:f:-ifISTZftqffitlnilifktiitrxfafc:2itft:aatZSN,IeeiVt-EI,.s?ga-Aeqrla,Aimiogjtr Lane Configurations Isposy4-- - Total Lost time (s) We' -1'14 Frt satd:1- low (prat) Satd. Flow (perm) TFj' ' „,%, , - • Peak-hourfactor, 10HF 0.92 .. - Nietf-'0,-. ...••, -', , .,.., ••••41g•' . - 4 -.1 ' _ Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 63 4.0 �iijj e'rels-'00 4.0 1.00 0.85 1780 1583 1296 1583 Awisitt , 0.92 0.92 4.0 4Pe e 4:6 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1781 1583 1770 1825 &alp% d4: • 1327 1583 584 1825 e e figt: `1: 4--terr 4.0 4.0 Nab 1.00 0.98 770 1834 , 164 1834 0.92 -01 41:71114-AIII4 0, Area Protected Phases PidMi777., Actuated Green, G Actuated g/C Ratio s) Vehicle Extension (s) n 6, vis ROT° Prot vie Ratio tj 440:. Progression Factor rip zOMP Delay (s) -*11. Approach Delay (s) :4t5' HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization 'Of 4 10.9 10.9 atg 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0:4 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 102 669 0 wi" ,..4"raqaake<atii 85 107 118 1108 5 Vae, 0.13 0.13 eV_ 3.0 3.0 60 • ,4 4 0.25 0.30 1.00 1.00 ITN& 36.4 36.6 36.5 0.77 -' 10.9- 66.1 'r 10.961.1 0.13 0.13 0.75 0.68 3.0 3.0 6.0 3.0 3.0 0.49 .• 0.02 c0.61 Olki-437* 0.52 0.23 0.89 rzei' 4 , 1.00 1.00 tt 38.9 39.0 39.0 gg, .00 1.00 4.7 21.5 1'4 19.8 64.1 60.1 0.73 0.67 3.0 • 41 ,1114, FM: c0.53 0.36 , 0.49 0.54 1.00 1.00 17.2 9.5 WWWF),11:r „,031,WMISV, 1,14A ;WO 41 4 • a 6,4tas• 86.5% ICU Level of Service 10.5 • • PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Appendix B: Signal Warrant Analysis Sheets A traffic signal warrant study based on the projected peak hour volumes was performed. The primary objective of using the peak hour traffic was determining whether Warrants 11 and 12 would be met for the intersections along A.W. Grimes Boulevard. Three of the five intersections met Warrants 11 and 12. The following pages are the results of warrants 11 and 12 for the three intersections. - Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company Intersection 2 Warrant Passed? 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume No 2 Interruption of continuous traffic No 3 Minimum pedestrian volume N/A 4 School Crossings N/A 5 Progressive Movement No 6Accident Experience N/A 7Systems N/A &Combination of Warrants No 9 Four Hour Volumes No 10Peak Hour Delay N/A 11 Peak Hour Volume Yes 12 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Yes 800 N 700 E 600 U 500 2 ca , 2 400 Nc < 300 200 100 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Figure 4-5: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Full Warrant Criteria Major Street - Total of Both Approaches Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 tr ft -t t c I k t 1rr L Figure 4-2.6 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Two High Hours 150 300 _c 0 8 250 -6 I 100 t_ 0_ a 8 c 50 2 200 0 150 400 , , 600 800 0) i 1400 1600 1800 100 02 (75 t> 50 _G M 0 400 500 1 600 700 800 900 Major Street- Total of Both Directions 1000 1100 1200 Figure 4-2.4 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Eight High Hours 200 150 . -6 I 100 8 c 50 0 400 , , 600 800 , , 1000 1200 Major Street - Total 1400 1600 1800 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 A.W Grimes Blvd and Logan Dr Warrant Passed? 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume No 2 Interruption of continuous traffic No 3Minimum pedestrian volume N/A 4 -School Crossings N/A 5 Progressive Movement No &Accident Experience N/A 7Systems N/A 8Combination of Warrants No 9 Four Hour Volumes No 10Peak Hour Delay N/A 11 Peak Hour Volume Yes 12 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Yes 800 N 700 TD O 600 — L 500 • U O 400 N N Q 300 6 200 100 0 Figure 4-5: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Full Warrant Criteria • 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 i 1 L.1 I t Figure 4-2.6 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Two High Hours 300 1 100 65 c t 50 0 0 , ,, 1 1 , 1 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Major Street - Total 2000 '97 250 CI. <CCi 200 2 0 150 0) i 100 2 i) C3 50 c 0, , , 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Major Street- Total of Both Directions Figure 4-2.4 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Eight High Hours 200 1 100 65 c t 50 0 400 , ,, 1 1 , 1 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Major Street - Total 2000 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 r L r Intersection 5 Warrant Passed? 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume No 2 Interruption of continuous traffic No 3 -Minimum pedestrian volume N/A 4 -School Crossings N/A 5 Progressive Movement No 6 Accident Experience N/A 7Systems NIA 8 Combination of Warrants No 9 Four Hour Volumes No 10 Peak Hour Delay N/A 11 Peak Hour Volume Yes 12 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Yes 800 700 E Z. 600 -C, 500 Ic :40 0 2 400 -6a- 2 < 300 65 o 200 100 Figure 4-5: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Full Warrant Criteria • • 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 r Figure 4-2.6 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Two High Hours 300 ..c e.) ? 250 a a. < LI> 200 —.%••••...,............................._ c. 150 ----......................................_ = i 100 2 t 50 c 01 400 500 1 600 700 800 900 Major Street- Total of Both Directions 1 1000 1100 1200 200 -g, 150 100 e 50 0 400 Figure 4-2.4 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Eight High Hours 600 800 1000 1200 Major Street - Total 1400 1600 1800 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 ...I ai a i- § 0 ., >-. i § S la j .-'ti ii /I g ni 1i� 1 h -,2 in 6 A,5 ES EF_su u 32iQr, EXHIBIT U PHASING PLAN Turtle Creek Village Planned Unit Development South Creek Subdivision ' Phasing Areas may be developed in incremental sub-phases 4° > as approved by the Director of Public Works + 3 1 P 31 A N A Aa al ." 1 _ IT gl°qlb Famllty �� pbuwl,ad Is oa PHASE III p°,,,,, n „ „ n , Kenningham Syn 1� T vsB as n a Park Sha e , spa 9q PHASE I ' F � s a, "�'.y�� 4'��' gingle Famliry �y F°mi1N Oebdld'T'T Mre° ��ye�O pslaGn� Q$, SIn91^ p' C1s s "19/sA' �3 10.4 Arras ] a„s�oB 1b+`yur�'^ mes 0lvd•110'ROW / > Ay./,rad Fbmm pblacnee s.5 Acres .]q gingis y G°Nn \ gingla Femilly Ached 14.7 M10 PHs E III `'Ingle Femiiry Attached 0.5 Arms PHASE II , \ � �IementeN Schpo110.5 Acres urr \\ G ain9le Fem11V spw \U\ paucnad ^„ow Clay Madsen u � Rec Center. Pro'ect 3 ° e P ' JIu I'�' p1 AT y e SI site �TT loPes °�' 1 II °mases Ar 6 ARA Greenslopes p°rMilburnHgmes Subdivision JUNE 12 2001 Ga R+%Mu,RM • Gn 1+.W 4 Scale 1"=2Aaminer Nc. nc wwuo m¢ms]rr m 00' b111 SM1W Crte4 OW i0b y44 _,a,AOp Aural,Tuu]W)1] T, u n]Je 513a53.a1), Piur.T. baue Canpge d Tumer Arm rw be, bb6 blTnu 18>ea 0 too 200' 400' Location Map NTC EXHIBIT M LICENSE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this day of , 2001, by and between the CITY OF ROUND ROCK, (hereinafter "Licensor"), a Texas home rule municipality, and the CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P., (hereinafter, "Licensee", whether one or more). Whereas, Licensor is the owner of the public right-of-way located within the Turtle Creek Planned Unit Development as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein; and Whereas, Licensee desires to exercise certain rights and privileges upon public rights-of-way located within the Property; and Whereas, Licensor desires to grant Licensee certain rights and privileges upon public rights-of-way within the Property; and NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: License 1. Licensee shall have the right to install, construct, operate, maintain, upgrade, and repair landscaping, lighting and irrigation systems in, over and upon public rights-of-way located within the Property, as described in Exhibit "A". It is understood that this Agreement creates a license only and that Licensee does not and shall not claim at any time any interest or estate of any kind in the public rights-of-way located within the Property by virtue of this license. It is further understood that before the installation of any current or subsequent landscaping or irrigation systems, Licensee shall present a detailed landscaping plan, with associated irrigation, to the Director of Planning and the Director of Public Works for review and approval. It is further understood that Licensee must comply with all other requirements of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Round Rock, Texas. It is further understood that Licensor has no duty to maintain, operate, replace, upgrade, or repair any improvement in or upon the Property, including the payment of any fees of any kind associated with any improvements. 00006428. doe ::ODNA\WORLDOX\O:\WDOX\CORK\GNL\ LICENSE \'MA IE\ 00006428.WPDCdC Consideration 2. In consideration for this license, Licensee shall pay Licensor $10.00 and other valuable consideration paid by Licensee to Licensor. Nonassignable 3. This license granted in this Agreement is personal to Licensee or any property owners association created to maintain Licensee's Improvements. This Agreement is not assignable except to said property owners association. Any otherassignment of this Agreement will automatically terminate the license. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee shall be permitted to assign Licensee's license under this Agreement for any entity acquiring all or a portion of Licensee's property adjacent to the Property provided such assignee assumes Licensee's obligations and rights granted under this Agreement, and Licensee shall be released from any and all obligations hereunder accruing after such assignment. Terminable at Will 4. This Agreement is terminable by either party at will by the giving of actual notice to the other party. Upon termination, any improvements to Property will become the property of Licensor and it is agreed that Licensor will not need to reimburse Licensee for any costs expended for said improvements. Indemnity 5. Licensee shall comply with the requirements of all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and shall indemnify and hold harmless Licensor, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, causes of action, expenses of litigation, court costs, and attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any person, or for damage to any property, arising out of or in connection with Licensee's exercise of the license under this Agreement. Release 6. Licensee assumes full responsibility for its exercise of the license, and hereby releases, relinquishes and discharges Licensor, its officers, agents and employees, from all claims, demands, and causes of action of every kind and character, including the cost of defense thereof, for any injury to, including death, of person (whether they be third persons, contractor, or employees of either of the parties hereto) and any 00006428. doc::°DNA\WORLDOX \0:\WDOX\CORK\GM, \ LICENSE \ TIM LTE \00006428.WE'D cdc loss of or damage to property (whether the same be that either of the parties hereto or of third parties) caused by or alleged to be caused, arising out of, or in connection with Licensee's exercise of the license under this Agreement whether or not said claims, demands and causes of action in whole or in part are covered by insurance. Venue 7. This Agreement shall be construed under and accord with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas. Notice 8. Notice shall be mailed to the addresses designated herein or as may be designated in writing by the parties from time to time and shall be deemed received when sent postage prepaid U.S. mail to the following addresses: CITY: City of Round Rock ATTN: City Manager 221 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 COMPANY: Attn: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this AGREEMENT is executed on this day of , 2001. CITY OF ROUND ROCK By: ROBERT A. STLUKA, JR., Mayor CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P. 3. By: STATE OF TEXAS ) ) COUNTY OF WI LL IAMSON ) Title: Printed Name: BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, on this day personally appeared ROBERT A. STLUKA, JR., as Mayor of the City of Round Rock, a Texas Home Rule Municipality, on behalf of said municipality, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the day of , 2001. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Texas STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, on this day personally appeared as for CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the day of , 2001. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Texas 4. After Recording, Please Return To: Brown, McCarroll Sheets & Crossfield, L.L.P. 309 East Main Round Rock, Texas 78664 THE STATE OF TEXAS * COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON CITY OF ROUND ROCK * t, CHRISTINE R. MARTINEZ, City Secretary of the City of Round Rock, Texas, do hereby certify that I am the custodian of the public records maintained by the City and that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. Z -01-07- 12-10B2 which was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Round Rock, Texas, at a meeting held on the 12th day of July 2001, as recorded in the minutes of the City of Round Rock in Book 45. CERTIFIED by my hand and seal of the City of Round Rock, Texas on this 11th day of January 2002. CHRISTINE R. MARTINEZ, City Secretary ORDINANCE NO. Z' O/- 07" is -106Z AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS ADOPTED IN SECTION 11.305(2), CODE OF ORDINANCES (1995 EDITION), CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, AND MAKING THIS AMENDMENT A PART OF THE SAID OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, TO WIT: TO ADOPT ORIGINAL ZONING ON 141.69 ACRES AND TO RE -ZONE 35.33 ACRES OF LAND, CURRENTLY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY -STANDARD LOT (SF -2), TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT NO. 47. WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council of the City of Round Rock, Texas to amend the Official Zoning Map to adopt original zoning on 141.69 acres and to re -zone 35.33 acres, currently zoned as Single Family -Standard Lot (SF -2), as Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 47, said tracts being described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein, and WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the requested change in the Official Zoning Map to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its recommendation and report, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing concerning the requested change on the 20th day of June, 2001, following lawful publication of the notice of said public hearing, and WHEREAS, after considering the public testimony received at such hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the Official Zoning Map be amended so that the zoning 0:\WPDOCS\ORDINANC\010712B2.WPD/Cdc classification of the property described in Exhibit "A" be changed to PUD No. 47, and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of July, 2001, after proper notification, the City Council held a public hearing on the requested amendment, and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the zoning provided for herein promotes the health, safety, morals and protects and preserves the general welfare of the community, and WHEREAS, each and every requirement set forth in Chapter 211, Sub -Chapter A., Texas Local Government Code, and Section 11.300, Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas concerning public notices, hearings, and other procedural matters has been fully complied with, Now Therefore BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, THAT: I. That the City Council has hereby determined the Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 47 meets the following goals and objectives: (1) The development in PUD No. 47 is equal to or superior to development that would occur under the standard ordinance requirements. (2) P.U.D. No. 47 is in harmony with the general purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the General Plan. 2. (3) P.U.D. No. 47 does not have an undue adverse effect upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utilities or any other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. (4) P.U.D. No. 47 will be adequately provisioned by essential public facilities and services including streets, parking, drainage, water, wastewater facilities, and other necessary utilities. (5) P.U.D. No. 47 will be constructed, arranged and maintained so as not to dominate, by scale and massing of structures, the immediate neighboring properties or interfere with their development or use in accordance with any existing zoning district. II. That the Official Zoning Map adopted in Section 11.305(2), Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas is hereby amended so that the zoning classification of the property described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein shall be, and is hereafter designated as Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 47, and that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to enter into the Agreement and Development Plan for PUD No. 47 attached hereto as Exhibit "B", which agreement shall govern the development and use of said property. III. A. All ordinances, parts of ordinances, or resolutions in conflict herewith are expressly repealed. 3. B. The invalidity of any section or provision of this ordinance shall not invalidate other sections or provisions thereof. Alternative 1. By motion duly made, seconded and passed with an affirmative vote of all the Council members present, the requirement for reading this ordinance on two separate days was dispensed with. READ, PASSED, and ADOPTED on first reading this JOv day of , 2001. Alternative 2. READ and APPROVED on first reading this the day of , 2001. READ, APPROVED and ADOPTED on second reading this the _ _ day of ATTEST: E LAND, City Secretary , 2001. RO •T A. S`L KA, JR., ayor City of Round Rock, Texas 4. Turtle Creek PUD #47 80-038sZC REQUEST: HISTORY: DATE OF REVIEW: OWNER: CONSULTING ENGINEER: DESCRIPTION: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: LOCATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: PROPOSED LAND USE: KEY PUD PROVISIONS: Planner: Jim Stendebach Approval of the zoning PUD District #47. Tract 1 has no previous zoning history (PUD will be original zoning). Tract 2 was zoned SF -2 with ordinance Z -94-01-13- 8H on January 13, 1994. 6/20/01 Continental Homes of Texas Carter & Burgess, Inc. Tract 1: 141.69 acres, P.A. Holder Survey A-297 Tract 2: 35.33 acres, P.A. Holder Survey A-297 Tract 1: None: Outside of City-Unzoned Tract 2: SF -2 -Single Family Residential Generally vacant North of Round Rock East, east of Greenslopes Subdivision, south of Lake Creek and west of South Creek Subdivision North: Lake Creek and Undeveloped land South: Round Rock East large lot single family East: South Creek Subdivision - single family residential West: Greenslopes Subdivision - single family residential Multiuse residential; this includes the following: 1. 88 acres of detatched single family residential 2. 22 acres of attached single family residential town house and condominiums for sale 3. 10.5 acre elementary school 4. 1 acre day care 5. 38 acres park and open space 6. Remainder consists of major streets and Forsman life estate 1. Provides right-of-way for A.W. Grimes Boulevard. 2. Provides approximately 38 acres of parkland which will accommodate the city trail system. 3. Provides two additional access points for South Creek Subdivision. 4. Provides Elementary School site. 5. Provides green strip adjacent to South Creek and Greenslopes subdivisions. 6. Provides day care site. 7. Provides for street trees and median trees. 8. Eliminates most driveways to streets. 9. Provides for a "traditional" neighborhood design with smaller Tots and reduced front setbacks with alley access. (88 acres or single family detached). 10. Provides for 22 acres of townhouse and "big house" condominium -units with "traditional design" and alley access. 11. Density based on the number units that could be developed on site using standard SF -2 zoning standards. GENERAL PLAN POLICY: Residential UTILITIES: The development proposes standard municipal services. STAFF COMMENTS: The PUD complies with the general plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Turtle Creek PUD #47, 00-038.ZC TURTLE CREEK PUD # 47 ZONING CASE mumui mum sa'1311Flihr *SS *" °Air % a ice 40011111111! 00 1 elli 1■ I. --Pi " • • • 11 Innel 0 moond 2 M 111111111111 111111 Mao 11/11:11111/' /111111 III h0 111111111/1111: 1111011011110111* IIIIIIP 11111 :ilii iflhil1%g U •1 : ■� .i 11�e1� ii I sa it°��g11111114% woo �� C �!`� 11i�� i�011100101 �� . "111111111:111111111;;S:4. !!!I �� 011111►1�1 ��`,'1 us ii I ili111111 11111�;;S: ■ unkloQ�Q��%_�� isoll 1511!!!1►� �.��•r� C ii1ris 11:�:111: muss gir irv401/4 E: senor. ;a ; 1111161Egi alp IlV ebitis RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or pans of the text on this page was not AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 47 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON THIS AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN (this "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Round Rock, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation, having its offices at 221 East Main Street, Round Rock, Texas 78664 (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"). WHEREAS, the Owner has submitted a request to the City to zone approximately 177 acres of land as a Planned Unit Development ("PUD"), said property being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred to as the "Property" or "Turtle Creek Village PUD"), and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 11, Section 11.316(8), Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, the Owner has submitted a development plan setting forth the development conditions and requirements within the PUD (the "Development Plan"), which Development Plan is contained in Section II of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Owner's application for a PUD. NOW THEREFORE BY THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the City and the Owner agrees as follows: I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. CONFORMITY WITH DEVELOPMENT PLAN All uses and development within the Property shall generally conform to the Development Plan set forth in Article II herein. 2. CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS No changes or modifications will be made to this Agreement or the Development Plan unless all provisions pertaining to changes or modifications as stated in Article III, Section 1 below are followed. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Development Agreement 3. ZONING VIOLATION The Owner understands that any person, firm, corporation or other entity violating any conditions or terms of the Development Plan shall be subject to any and all penalties for the violation of any zoning ordinance as stated in Section 1.601, Code of Ordinances, (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, as amended. 4. CONCEPT PLAN Approval of this Ordinance shall constitute approval of the Concept Plan for the Turtle Creek Village PUD. 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5.1 Assignment. Neither party may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without having first obtained the prior written consent of the other which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section shall not prevent the Owner from conveying the Property or portions of the Property, together with all development rights and obligations contained in this Agreement. 5.2 Necessary Documents and Actions. Each party agrees to execute and deliver all such other and further instruments and undertake such actions as are or may become necessary or convenient to effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 5.3 Severability. In case any one or more provisions contained herein are deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions hereof and in such event, this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. 5.4 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understandings or representations of the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 5.5 Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Development Agreement State of Texas. 5.6 Venue. All obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas and venue for any action arising hereunder shall be in Williamson County. 5.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any person or entity, other than the parties hereto (and their respective successors and assigns) any rights, benefits or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement. 5.8 Duplicate Originals. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each of equal dignity. 5.9 Notices. Until changed by written notice thereof, any notice required under this Agreement may be given to the respective parties by certified mail, postage prepaid or by hand delivery to the address of the other party shown below: OWNER: Continental Homes of Texas, L.P. Attn: Mr. Terry Mitchell 12554 Riata Vista Circle 2nd Floor Austin, TX 78727 5.10 Effective Date. CITY OF ROUND ROCK: City of Round Rock, Texas 212 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 Attn: Director of Planning This Agreement shall be effective from and after the date of due execution hereof by all parties. 5.11 Binding Effect. This Agreement and the Development Plan binds and benefits the Owner and its successors and assigns. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Development Agreement II. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. DEFINITIONS Words and terms used herein, not specifically defined in this section, shall have their usual force and meaning, or as defined in the Code of Ordinances (1995 Edition), City of Round Rock, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "the Code". For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section: Alley. A minor private right-of-way, either two-way or one-way, located through the interior of blocks within a parcel owned by the Homeowners Association and providing vehicular and service access to the side or rear of properties; use of the parcels is for the benefit of adjoining property owners and is subject to limitations, rules and restrictions of the Homeowners Association. Appurtenances. Spires, belfries, cupolas, water tanks, ventilators, chimneys or other appurtenances usually required to be placed above the roof level and not intended for human occupancy and not exceeding ten feet (10') in height. Carport. A structure with one or more sides, covered with a roof and constructed specifically for the storage of one or more vehicles. Civic Uses. A parcel designated for cultural services use, private primary education facilities use, primary educational facilities use or child development centers (daycare). Common open space. A parcel of land or an area of water, or a combination of land and water, which may include floodplain and wetland areas, within a development site and intended for the use and enjoyment of residents of the development and, where designated, the community at large. Condominium building. A building or portion thereof used or intended to be used as a home for two (2) or more households living independently of each other. Dry Utilities Public utilities other than water, wastewater and storm sewer. These include but are not necessarily limited to electricity, gas, telephone, cablevision and other communication system lines. Exhibits to PUD. The following is a list of exhibits to this PUD Ordinance: Exhibit "A" — Property description Exhibit "B" — Affidavit of No Liens Exhibit "C" — Single Family Detached Standards TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 4 Development Agreement Exhibit "D" — Single Family Attached Standards Exhibit "E" — Open Space Standards Exhibit "F" — Parking Standards Exhibit "G" — Daycare Standards Exhibit "H" — Street Sections Exhibit "I" — Planting Strips Exhibit "J" — TIA Exhibit "K" — Land Use Plan Exhibit "L" — Phasing Plan Exhibit "M"- License Agreement Forsman Life Estate Lot. A one -acre tract of land situated within the boundaries of the Turtle Creek Village PUD, on which a resident, Paul Forsman, currently resides. Owner has conveyed a life estate to Paul Forsman; Owner plans to develop this property pursuant to this Ordinance at such time that the property is released to Owner. Front Porch. An unairconditioned roofed structure attached to the front of a house. Side and rear porches are not subject to these same requirements. A front porch may include ramps for handicapped access. Enclosure of front porches shall not be permitted. A restrictive covenant forbidding enclosure of front porches shall be placed on the property and shall be enforced by the Homeowners Association. Homeowners Association ("HOA"). An organization made up of the property owners in the area, which is responsible for maintenance of private alleys, and the open spaces not conveyed to the City, and which shall have the authority to make and collect assessments sufficient to operate and maintain private alleys, street trees and open spaces. A Homeowners Association shall be created for Turtle Creek Village PUD; the documents creating the HOA shall be recorded with this Agreement. Open Style Fence A fence designed to enclose a private yard, which abuts a park, green strip, golf course or alley. The required features of this fence include the ability to see through the fence (a minimum of 50% of the fence surface area shall be open), construction of low maintenance materials and posts or columns set in concrete.. The maximum height of an open style fence shall be 42 inches in a street yard ( street yards do not include alleys) and 48 inches for fences other than wrought iron or equivalent fences in other yards. Wrought iron or equivalent fences shall not exceed six feet in height. Masonry columns are permitted as part of all Open Style Fences. Pedestrian Way. An access way located within Residential Condominium development areas providing pedestrian movement within the area. Plan. The criteria and specifications as set forth in this Development Plan and the accompanying layout which is attached hereto as Exhibit "K". Planting Strip. A portion of land of public street right-of-way or a portion of land abutting private property, which is reserved for the purpose of landscaping and TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 5 Development Agreement installation of street trees. Cross sections of various street rights-of-way and abutting private property reflecting these planting strips are attached hereto as Exhibit "I". Private Interior Drive. A minor private access way either two-way or one-way, located within Residential Condominium development areas and providing vehicular and other access to public streets. All private interior drives will be maintained by the Homeowners Association for the area. Protected Trees. A protected tree, for the purpose of this PUD, is an individual tree of a tree species identified as protected in the City Code with a diameter of nineteen inches (19") or greater if located in a proposed street right-of-way or a diameter of eight inches (8") or greater if located on a townhouse or condominium lot. Residential Condominium. The use of a site for two (2) or more dwelling units, within one or more condominium buildings with each dwelling unit having a private external entrance and private parking and having one or more common walls. All common areas that form part of a Residential Condominium development shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association for private open space. Residential Street. The entire width included in any public right-of-way which is open for the use of the public to accommodate motor vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists and transit facilities. • A "standard residential collector" provides circulation within neighborhoods to carry circulation from local streets to arterial streets: • An "alternative residential collector street" provides circulation within neighborhoods to carry circulation from local streets to arterial streets using a smaller street section than a standard collector. • A "boulevard collector" is a short distance, low speed circulation corridor, that traverses a residential area and segregates the traffic and parking activity from opposing traffic. • A "standard local street" is a street designed primarily for access to abutting residential property. • An "alternative local street" is a street designed primarily for access to abutting residential property using a smaller street section than a standard local street. • An "access street" is a low volume street which is parallel and adjacent to an arterial street or open space area which primarily provides access to abutting properties located on one side of the lane. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 6 Development Agreement Residential Townhouse. The use of a series of sites for two or more dwelling units, constructed with common or abutting walls and each located on a separate ground parcel within the total development site, together with common area serving all dwelling units within the townhouse group. "Shall", "must", "will", "should", and "may". The words "shall", "must", and "will" are always mandatory. The words "should" and "may" are discretionary. Single Family Residential. A small lot single-family detached residential subdivision that allows the lot size to be reduced with the resulting space gained being assigned to common open space. Shared driveway. A paved vehicular access designed to residential driveway standards, which extends to and branches off to two (2) or more homes; which is privately owned and maintained and does not require a turn around area at the end of the driveway. Shared driveways shall not exceed one hundred fifty feet (150') in length. Single-family Attached Residential. The use of a series of sites for two or more dwelling units, constructed with common or abutting walls. Residential Condominium and Residential Townhouse may both be implemented as single-family attached residential. Single-family Detached Residential. The use of a site for only one dwelling unit with an attached or detached garage unit. Traffic calming measures. Street design elements intended to reduce the speed of vehicular traffic, which shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to the approval of construction drawings for each final plat. 2. PROPERTY This Development Plan covers approximately 177.0 acres of land, located within the city limits of Round Rock, Texas, and more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "A". 3. PURPOSE AND DESIGN 3.1 Compliance with Code requirements. The purpose of this Plan is to insure a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") that: (i) is, on the whole, equal to or superior to development that would occur under the standard ordinance requirements, (ii) is in harmony with the General Plan of the City of Round Rock, Texas, (iii) does not have an undue adverse affect upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utilities or any other matters affecting the public health, safety and welfare, (iv) is adequately provisioned by essential public facilities and services, and (v) will be developed and maintained so as to not TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 7 Development Agreement dominate, by scale or massing of structures, the immediate neighboring properties or interfere with their development or use in accordance with any existing zoning district. 3.2 Intent. The design of this Plan includes a variety of potential residential land uses including single-family residential, townhouse and condominiums. The design includes open spaces including courts, parks, linear parks, and greenbelts. The plan promotes pedestrian activity and circulation through well-designed streetscapes that provide for the safe and efficient movement of vehicular traffic and pedestrian circulation separate from the high speed arterial. 33 Civic Uses. Civic uses that are oriented to the general public are an important element in the Plan. The locations of these civic uses are designated on the Land Use Plan. 3.4 Open Space. Open space design is a significant part of the Plan. These serve as areas for neighborhood gatherings and as organizing elements for the neighborhood. Open space should be distributed throughout the neighborhood. In addition to addressing the recreational needs of residents, open space provides places and opportunities for interaction within the community. 3.5 Pedestrian Orientation. The Plan is to be pedestrian oriented. To accomplish this goal, the street pattern is designed to reduce vehicle travel speeds and encourage pedestrian activity. The design for various street cross sections is shown in Exhibit "H" attached hereto. 4. APPLICABILITY OF CITY ORDINANCES 4.1 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The Property shall be regulated for purposes of zoning and subdivision by this Plan. All aspects not specifically covered by this Plan shall be regulated by applicable sections of the Code. 4.2 Other Ordinances. All other Ordinances within the Code shall apply to the Property, except as clearly modified by this Plan. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 8 Development Agreement 5. DEVELOPMENT AREAS The Property will be divided into five (5) Development Areas: Development Area A: single family detached residential, Development Area B: single family attached residential, Development Area C: school site, Development Area D: daycare site and Development Area E: public and private open space, all as designated on the PUD Land Use plan, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "K". 6. PERMITTED USES AND LIMITATIONS The Property will be used and developed in accordance with the requirements as set forth in this Agreement and, if not set forth herein, by applicable sections in the Code. Specific permitted uses and limitations applicable to the separate development areas are as follows: 6.1 Development Area A - Single Family Detached Residential. The permitted uses and limitations for the Single Family (Detached) Residential Areas are detailed on Exhibit "C" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.2 Development Area B - Single Family Attached Residential - Residential Condominiums or Residential Townhouses. Single Family Attached Residential shall include either Residential Condominiums or Residential Townhouses. The permitted uses and limitations for the Single Family Attached Residential Areas are detailed on Exhibit "D" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.3 Development Area C - School Site. The permitted uses and limitations for the elementary school site are detailed on Exhibit "G" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.4 Development Area D - Day Care Site. The permitted uses and limitations for the day care site are detailed on Exhibit "G" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this Agreement. 6.5 Development Area E - Open Space. The permitted uses and limitations for all open space are detailed on Exhibit "E" and shall conform to the standards of the Code, except as set forth within this TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 9 Development Agreement Agreement. 7. STORM WATER DETENTION Storm water detention for the Property shall be provided in accordance with City Code. 8. ROADWAYS 8.1 Residential Streets. The street system shall consist of public streets, private alleys, and landscaped rights-of-way accommodating automobiles, public transit, bicycles, pedestrians and landscaped areas. Rear service alleys are a preferred element in the design of the neighborhood. Streets shall be laid out so as to discourage their use by through traffic. On -street parking along one or both sides of the street is the normal street condition. All streets and alleys within the Turtle Creek Village PUD, with the exception of A. W. Grimes Boulevard, shall adhere to the criteria as stated in Exhibit "H". 8.2 Innovative Design. The Director of Public Works and Fire Marshall may approve the use of roadway designs that are not listed herein. Said approval shall be considered a minor change to the Development Plan. 8.3 Blocks. Blocks shall generally be not more than one thousand (1,000) feet in length, and shall be, at minimum, bounded on either end of the axis by a local street. Block lengths exceeding this length may be approved by the Planning Director for good and sufficient reasons (example: open space frontage, curvilinear streets and/or where alleys are provided). 8.4 Traffic Calming Measures. The use of traffic calming measures intended to reduce the speed of vehicular traffic within the subdivision are permitted throughout the Turtle Creek Village PUD subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works and the Fire Marshall. 8.5 Alleys. (a) Width and Paving. Alleys, if constructed, shall have a minimum right of way width of twenty feet (20') with a concrete surface of not less than TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 10 Development Agreement sixteen feet (16') in width. All alley paving shall be done in accordance with City standards and with the approval of the Director of Public Works. Alleys shall be approximately parallel to the frontage of the street. (b) Intersecting alleys or utility easements. Where two alleys or utility easements intersect or turn at right angle, a cutoff of not less than ten feet (10') from the normal intersection of the property or easement line shall be provided along each property or easement line where practical. (c) Dead-end alleys. Dead-end alleys shall not extend more than ninety feet (90') and shall be approved by the Director of Public Works. (d) Private alleys. All alleys, if constructed, shall be designated as private alleys. All private alleys shall be shown as separate lots on all plats. All private alleys shall be conveyed to and maintained by the Homeowners Association. (e) Except as approved by the Director of Public Works, parking in alleys is prohibited. Signage shall be erected by the Owner in alleys to indicate that parking is prohibited. 8.6 Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be separated by a Planting Strip as shown on Exhibit "I". Sidewalks may be located outside the right-of-way for the purpose of saving existing trees provided (i) it is approved by the Director of Public Works and City legal counsel, and (ii) they are located in a public easement shown on the plat. 8.7 Street Trees. (a) Location. Trees shall be located along all streets (except where existing trees remain in the right-of-way) as shown on Exhibit "H". (b) Species. Street trees include suitable shade tree varieties. The following tree species are permitted: • Burr Oak • Cedar Elm • Chinese (Lacebark) Elm • Chinese Pistache • Chinquapin Oak • Live Oak • Monterey Oak • Pecan • Shumard Oak TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 11 Development Agreement • Texas Red Oak Additional tree species may be used with the approval of the City Urban Forester. Generally, no more than twenty percent (20%)of the total street trees on a single street, which is greater than four hundred feet (400') in length, shall be of one species unless approved by the City Urban Forester. (c) Planting Plan. The Owner shall submit a street tree planting plan in conjunction with the submittal of construction plans for each phase of the Property. (d) License and Maintenance Agreement. The City shall grant a license and maintenance agreement to the HOA for the installation, maintenance, replacement, upgrade and/or repair of landscape improvements constructed within any and all planting strips for the Property. Said License Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "M". 8.8 Planting Criteria. • Street trees should be kept out of (i) intersection triangles at a minimum of thirty-five feet (35') by thirty-five feet (35') from the face of the curb, and (ii) alley/street intersection triangles at a minimum of twenty-five feet (25') by twenty-five feet (25'), as measured from the center of the intersection. A sketch reflecting these specifications is attached hereto as Exhibit "I". • Street trees shall be planted to avoid interference with street lights, signage and other fixtures. • Planting shall remain at least five feet (5') from edge of driveways. • Spacing should be small trees, twenty feet (20'); medium trees, thirty feet (30'); and large trees, forty feet (40'). Exact tree spacing and the separation of tree species shall both be evaluated on a site-specific basis. • Planting should be at least five feet (5') from underground utilities and twenty-five feet (25') from overhead lines. • Planting should be at least five feet (5') from fire hydrants. • Street trees and median trees shall be planted a minimum of four feet (4') from the back of the curb. • Shade trees shall be container grown with a minimum caliper size of two and a half inches (2.5"). TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 12 Development Agreement • Ornamental trees shall be container grown with a minimum caliper size of one and a half inches (1.5"). • Caliper size, height, measurement and other specifications shall be as specified in American Standards for Nursery Stock (ANSI260.1) 8.9 Median Trees. Median trees shall include shade or ornamental tree species. Medians may also contain shrubs and plant groundcover.. The following tree species are permitted Shade Trees: Ornamental Trees: Bald Cypress Cherry Laurel Burr Oak Crape Myrtle Cedar Elm Deciduous Yaupon Chinaquapin Oak Desert Willow Chinese (Lacebark) Elm Flame Leaf Sumac Chinese Pistache Mexican Buckeye Live Oak Mexican Plum Monterey Oak Mountain Laurel Pecan Redbud Shumard Oak Texas Persimmon Texas Ash Texas Pistache Texas Red Oak Vitex Whitebud Yaupon Additional species may be used with the approval of the City Urban Forester. In general, no more than twenty percent (20%) of the total median trees on a single street, which is greater than four hundred feet (400') in length, shall be of one species unless approved by the City Urban Forester. 8.10 Access Streets. Access streets may be accessed from any street type or alley other than A. W. Grimes Boulevard. A Planting Strip shall be constructed in the area between all access lanes and A. W. Grimes Boulevard. The Planting Strip shall consist of a berm with trees, shrubs, grasses and a low, penetrable fence such as wrought iron or split rail, to provide a visual and physical barrier between the access lanes and A. W. Grimes Boulevard. 8.11 A. W. Grimes Boulevard. (a) An agreement that will be mutually agreed upon between the Owner and the City regarding the construction of A. W. Grimes Boulevard shall be executed simultaneously with the adoption of this Agreement. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 13 Development Agreement (b) Pedestrian Underpass. If approved by the Director of Public Works, the Owner shall contribute to the cost of construction of a pedestrian underpass in compliance with the approved arterial roadway plans, located on A.W. Grimes Boulevard, which abuts the southern Property boundary. 8.12 Traffic Impact Analysis. A Traffic Impact Analysis ("TIA") has been approved by the City Traffic Engineer and is attached hereto as Exhibit "J". Street standards shall be designed in accordance with the TIA. 9. UTILITY LINES 9.1 Construction of Utility Lines. All utility lines that pass under a street shall be installed before the street is paved, whenever practical. All utility lines that pass under the street pavement shall be installed to a point at least three feet (3') beyond the edge of the pavement. City utility assignments shall be arranged so that utilities are not located underneath alleys except to cross perpendicularly for distribution. Subject to the approval of the electric and gas provider for the property, buried utilities may be located within the alley service drive and under public street pavement, three feet (3') inside the edge of the pavement. Electric distribution shall be provided by means of underground service within the subdivision. Overhead service to individual lots shall not be permitted. All water, wastewater and drainage utilities shall be located in the front public right-of-way. 10. STREET LIGHTS The Developer may, with City approval, incorporate alternative lighting standards designed to aesthetically enhance the Turtle Creek Village PUD as long as the following conditions are satisfied: (a) The electric utility provider for the property agrees to accept the obligation of providing the required maintenance for such lighting at no additional cost to the City. (b) All street lights provide the required level of lighting, as approved by the Director of Public Works. 11. PARKLAND DEDICATION OR DESIGNATION All land to be dedicated for use as parkland within the Turtle Creek Village PUD shall conform with the criteria set forth on Exhibit "E" attached hereto and incorporated herein. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 14 Development Agreement 12. DENSITY A maximum of seven hundred fifty (750) dwelling units may be constructed on the property, which converts to an overall gross density of 4.24 units per acre. 13. PHASING Phasing of the Turtle Creek Village PUD shall be in general accordance with the Phasing Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "L". The phasing may be amended by a revised Concept Plan approved by the City Planning and Zoning Commission. 14. NON -CONFORMING USES 14.1 Forsman Life Estate Lot. The Forsman Life Estate does not conform to the provisions of this Agreement and shall be deemed a non -conforming use. At such time that the Forsman Life Estate Lot is released to the Owner, the Owner may subdivide and develop said lot as either Single Family Detached Residential or Single Family Attached Residential in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 15. REQUIRED BUILDING MATERIALS Residential building exteriors may be finished in brick stone, cast stone, stucco, or painted cementious siding, such as "Hardiboard". Wood siding, vinyl siding, and metal siding is prohibited. 16. FENCES Fences that abut parks, green strips and alleys shall be Open Style Fences as defined in this agreement. 17. INTERPRETATION OF USE Interpretation of uses not clearly permitted or prohibited shall be made in writing by the Director of Planning. A copy of interpretations shall be provided to the Owner and the City Building Inspector. 18. TREE PRESERVATION Owner shall make every reasonable effort to either preserve or relocate the existing trees within the Turtle Creek Village PUD. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 15 Development Agreement 18.1 Tree Protection Plan. (a) Preliminary Plat. A tree survey showing all protected trees (as defined in Section 1 herein) shall be provided with the filing of each preliminary plat. The preliminary plat must demonstrate that the subdivision design will result in the reasonable protection of protected trees and significant tree clusters with a crown diameter of one hundred feet (100') or greater. The tree survey must be reviewed by the City Urban Forester. (b) Tree Protection Plan. A tree protection plan, which identifies all protected tree species located within proposed street rights-of-way together with a calculation of the total number of caliper inches of protected trees to be removed shall be provided with the filing of each preliminary plat. The tree protection plan must be approved by the City Urban Forester. The tree protection plan shall also show specific tree protection measures for protected trees within street rights-of-way and the area within ten feet (10') of said rights-of-way. (c) Tree Replacement Plan. Each preliminary plat shall include a plat note, which states that the total number of caliper inches of protected trees being removed shall be replaced. A replacement tree plan shall be provided as part of the subdivision construction plans and must be approved by the City Urban Forester. (d) Credit for Street Trees. All street trees planted by Owner shall be credited towards any Owner obligation to replace protected trees. (e) Site Plan. Application for site plan approval for uses other than single family detached homes shall be accompanied by a tree protection and replacement plan to include a survey for trees 8 inches in diameter or larger. 18.2 Street Trees. (a) Street trees and associated irrigation fronting along A. W. Grimes Boulevard shall be installed as part of the subdivision improvements along A. W. Grimes Boulevard. (b) Street trees and associated irrigation plans shall be submitted as part of the construction drawings for subdivision improvements for all streets within the PUD other than A. W. Grimes. The actual planting of street trees and associated irrigation may be permitted to be delayed until the homes are constructed on each block, provided that Owner posts a fiscal guarantee in an amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the estimated cost of such improvements. The estimate of the cost shall be approved by the City Urban Forester and shall be in the same form as required for other subdivision improvements. (c) The HOA shall be responsible for the replacement of all street trees within the Property. The HOA shall also be responsible for the maintenance and replacement of all other landscaping and associated irrigation located within center medians, with the exception of landscaping improvements constructed within the median of A. W. Grimes TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 16 Development Agreement Boulevard. With the exception of A.W. Grimes Boulevard, all landscaping within center medians shall be irrigated by an underground irrigation system with water meters in the name of the HOA. The Urban Forester shall approve the size and species for all replacement trees within public rights of way. No street trees shall be removed without the written approval of the City Urban Forester. (d) The HOA and or the individual homeowners shall be responsible for the irrigation and routine maintenance of the trees located in front of homeowners' lots that are situated within the portion of the public right-of-way between the sidewalk and the curb. The restrictive covenants, recorded for the subdivision shall clearly identify this responsibility. (e) The estimated costs of maintaining street trees, landscaping and irrigation (including the cost of water, electricity and reserve fund to replace equipment) shall be provided along with an estimate of projected monthly HOA fees required to support such maintenance and repair. (f) Street tree planting plans shall be submitted as part of the subdivision construction drawings and approved by the Urban Forester. These street plans shall also identify trees to be preserved that are identified in the tree survey. The Urban Forester shall inspect and accept all trees and irrigation installations. Street tree plans shall include all specifications of tree installation. (g) Owner shall post a bond to ensure three (3) years of maintenance of street trees and median landscaping improvements, including irrigation. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 17 Development Agreement IH. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 1. CHANGES TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.1 Minor Changes. Minor changes to this Agreement or the Development Plan which do not substantially change this Agreement or the Development Plan may be approved administratively, if approved in writing, by the Director of Public Works or the Director of Planning and Community Development, and the City Attorney. 1.2 Major Changes. Major changes to this Agreement or the Development Plan must be resubmitted following same procedure required by the original PUD application. 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDED The Round Rock General Plan is hereby amended to reflect the provisions of this Agreement and Development Plan. Continental Homes Of Texas, L.P. Cit and Rock, Texas (a Texas limited partnership) By: CHTEX of Texas, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) Its sole general partner By: Terry E. Mitchell Vice President Date: , 2001 Date: 17' — , 2001 TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 18 Development Agreement 'Net Forsman Boundary 141.69 Acres EXHIBIT A - TRACT 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 141.69 ACRES OF OUT OF THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY NO. 9, ABSTRACT 297, IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 141.69 ACRES OF LAND BEING THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 153.25 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO CARL ANTON FORSMAN, ET AL, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 128, PAGE 456 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 141.69 ACRE TRACT ALSO BEING A PORTION OF THE 151.37 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a'/2 -inch iron rod found for the southeast corner of the following described 151.37 acre tract, being the southwest corner of Lot 11, Block A of South Creek Section One, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 66 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being in the north line of Block B of South Creek Section Seventeen, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 230 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, with the south line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said South Creek Section Seventeen, S 83°28'55" W, passing at a distance of 504.36 feet a 1/4 -inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of a called 1.50 are tract of land described in a deed to Hugh Noel as recorded in Document No. 9652164 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the northeast corner of Round Rock East, a subdivision, continuing with the south line of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said Round Rock East, passing at a distance of 1615.16 feet a 1/2 -inch iron rod found for the northwest corner of the said Round Rock East, being a northeast corner of a called 16.812 acre Park Site as shown on Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet D, Slide 70 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, continuing with the south line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the north line of the said Park Site, a total distance of 1758.54 feet to a 5" fence corner post found for the southwest corner of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the northwest corner of the said Park Site, and being in the east line of Block A of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two; THENCE, with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said Block A, N 04°40'12" W, passing at a distance of 485.27 feet the northeast corner of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Two, being the southeast corner of Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 115 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, continuing a total distance of 635.97 feet to a '/2 -inch iron rod found for an angle point in the east line of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine; THENCE, continuing the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, the following ten (10) courses: 1. N 05°37'14" W, a distance of 303.14 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 01 °53'59" W, a distance of 134.84 feet to a 60-D nail found; 3. N 01 °42'46" E, a distance of 271.01 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 04°49'10" W, a distance of 297.49 feet to a'/2- inch iron rod found; 5. N 05°46'57" W, a distance of 248.36 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; Page 1 of 5 Net Forsman Boundary '141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 6. N 03°39'14" W, a distance of 184.70 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 7. N 05°05'29" W, a distance of 247.21 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 8. N 05°31'59" W, a distance of 214.93 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 9. N 05°11'44" W, a distance of 274.53 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 10. N 05°47'57" W, a distance of 48.62 feet to a'h-inch iron rod found, for the northeast corner of the said Greenslopes At Lake Creek Section Nine, being a southeast corner of the remainder of a called 231.374 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Gaston Development Co. and Garland Development Co. as recorded in Volume 710, Page 700 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 231.374 acre tract the following five (5) courses: 1. N 04°42'21" W, a distance of 274.53 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 14°35'00" W, a distance of 68.55 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 01°12'00" W, a distance of 58.95 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 19°18'53" E, a distance of 57.66 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 5. N 30°12'00" W, a distance of 47.68 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set, for the northeast corner of the said 231.374 acre tract, being the southeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 6.591 acre tract the following four (4) courses: 1. N 36°28'50" W, a distance of 39.42 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 22°05'00" W, a distance of 34.83 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 00°40'00" E, a distance of 122.92 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 521.98 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set, for the northwest corner of said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of the said 6.591 acre tract, and being in the southeast line of a Union Pacific Railroad, (formerly known as International and Great Northern Company Railroad) 100' right-of-way as recorded in Volume 17, Page 705 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, from which a 1 -inch iron pipe with bolt found bears N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 1.65 feet; THENCE, with the northwest line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the southeast line of the said Union Pacific right-of-way, the following two (2) courses: Page 2of5 Net Forsman Boundary ,141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 1. N 72°31'19" E, a distance of 465.41 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. a distance of 476.44 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 07°39'26", with a radius of 3564.94 feet and whose chord bears N 71°15'15" E, a distance of 476.08 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set for the northwest corner of a called 2.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to David L. Carlin and Mary C. Carlin as recorded in Document No. 9759883 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for a northeast corner of said 151.37 acre tract; THENCE, leaving the southeast line of the said Union Pacific Railroad, being the northwest line of the original 153.25 acre tract, with the boundary of the said 2.0 acre tract and said 151.37 acre tract, the following six (6) courses: 1. S 14°40'00" E, at a distance of 7.82 feet to % inch iron rod found, a total distance of 211.08 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 2. N 53°39'15" E, a distance of 67.99 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 3. N 78°14'55" E, a distance of 88.43 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 4. S 78°19'58" E, a distance of 71.77 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 5. S 64°43'52" E, a distance of 120.44 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: 6. S 70°33'46" E, a distance of 56.11 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek, being the southeast corner of the said 2.0 acre tract, being a northeast corner of said 151.37 acre tract, and being in the west line of a called 42.478 acre tract of land described in a deed to Richard C. Jennings as recorded in Document No. 9558188 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said 42.478 acre tract, the following two (2) courses: 1. S 14°38'22" E, a distance of 312.87 feet to a fence post on a cattle guard; 2. S 14°36'27" E, a distance of 1460.07 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; THENCE, continuing with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of a called 1.7 acre tract of land described in a deed to J & S Group, Ltd. as recorded in Volume 2525, Page 841 and Volume 2532, Page 623 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being the west line of South Creek Section Twenty, Phase One, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet L, Slide 201 of the Plat Records of Williamson County , Texas, S 07°00'43" E a distance of 545.21 feet to a Y2 -inch iron rod found for the southwest corner of the said South Creek Section Twenty, Phase One, being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block B of South Creek Section Seven, a subdivision recorded in Cabinet G, Slide 259 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the east line of said 151.37 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Seven, and the west line of the said South Creek Section One, the following two (2) courses: 1. S 06° 58' 17" E, a distance of 1507.12 feet to a 1% -inch iron pipe found for an angle point, and Page 3of5 Net Forsman Boundary •141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 2. S 07° 33' 54" E, a distance of 165.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 151.37 acres of land. SAVING AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following 9.68 acre tract of land: BEGINNING at a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found, being the northwest corner of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas, and being in the southeast line of a Union Pacific Railroad, (formerly known as International and Great Northern Company Railroad) 100' right-of-way as recorded in Volume 17, Page 705 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, from which a 1 -inch iron pipe with bolt found bears N 00°00'00" W, a distance of 1.65 feet; THENCE, with the northwest line of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the southeast line of the said Union Pacific right-of-way, the following two (2) courses: 1. N 72°31'19" E, a distance of 465.41 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found; 2. a distance of 476.44 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 07°39'26", with a radius of 3564.94 feet and whose chord bears N 71°15'15" E, a distance of 476.08 feet to a 5/8 - inch iron rod with cap found being the northwest corner of a called 2.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to David L. Carlin and Mary C. Carlin as recorded in Document No. 9759883 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the northeast corner of the said 151.37 acre tract; THENCE, leaving the southeast line of the said Union Pacific Railroad, being the northwest line of the said 151.37 acre tract, with the boundary of the said 2.0 acre tract and the said 151.37 acre tract, S 14°40'00" E, at a distance of 7.82 feet to 1/2 inch iron rod found, a total distance of 211.08 feet to a point in the approximate center of Lake Creek: THENCE leaving the said boundary of the 2.0 acre tract and the 151.37 acre tract and crossing the said 151.37 acre tract the following seven (7) courses: 1. S 66° 50' 34" W, a distance of 163.08 feet to a point, 2. S 46° 48' 11" W, a distance of 307.03 feet to a point, 3. S 63° 14' 57" W, a distance of 102.12 feet to a point, 4. S 29° 13' 49" W, a distance of 140.23 feet to a point, 5. S 43° 17' 30" W, a distance of 292.61 feet to a point, 6. S 30° 10' 55" W, a distance of 143.90 feet to a point, Page 4 of 5 Net Fqrsman Boundary 141.69 Acres FN 00-065 (JRS) April 12, 2001 Job No. 050214.001.1.4047 7. S 80° 43' 01" W, a distance of 108.09 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap found, on the west line of the said 151.37 acre tract, being the northeast corner of the remainder of a called 231.374 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Gaston Development Co. and Garland Development Co. as recorded in Volume 710, Page 700 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the southeast corner of a called 6.591 acre tract of land described in a deed to Sue Hoover as recorded in Volume 2159, Page 880 of the Official Records of Williamson county, Texas; THENCE, continuing with the west line of the herein described 151.37 acre tract, being the east line of the said 6.591 acre tract the following four (4) courses: 1. N 36°28'50" W, a distance of 39.42 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 2. N 22°05'00" W, a distance of 34.83 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 3. N 00°40'00" E, a distance of 122.92 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod with cap set; 4. North, a distance of 521.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 9.68 acres of land, more or less, and CONTAINING A NET TOTAL OF 141.69 ACRES OF LAND. THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That 1, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the2"' day of April, 2001 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 JOHN STRAWBRIDGE Page 5 of 5 J. n Strawbridg Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas BEGINNING SUE HOMER Y0.UCL 2720. 00 0 N 00'40'60' E 122.02' `-.N 22'05'00' w N 36'2810' W 3642' F@ I $ J 04lisoft2 POINT OF 'vooloo s 14.40'x0' 211.08' 11 6634' w 46'48111• W 307.03' s 63'14'5r w Nair SO' VAL PM VOL WV /� ss14 W 0.23' 43'17'30" W 252.51' 30'10'53• W 143.00' S 50'43'01' W LOOAN CEAKIEW LOOP LEEN DOORS OR 0 g 5 1 Mw L CmJI & MARY C. CAWM 2.0 AS DOM 0700803 10 - moo OWL MPP, U1E3 J. HOOVER 1d a'MES 14 I PAL POO VOL 1.4 .a At A.1 VOL Lt MOIL R 110 151.37 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000066004 RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or parts of the text on this page was not dearly lggbls £oR satiektory reasaation. If NILRILL EAN MOM •CYO �^rene M SCALE : 1" = 500' ARRIL, 2001 TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 141Gat 010122• !RINE D. IDLER tat AC. 18710 PO. KO OWL FM VOL allt. VO. 33.61 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000065504 1.7 ACRES CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L. P. DOC. NO. 2000066002 VOL 1M Paw 501/114 CREEK SEG. 5EE11 CAS S !L 290 LOOAN OR. 1 3 o REDNINO I M • SIE 11001ER 23217 AC. VOL 2137, PS 210 MOW OAT is Ir. IIA0(11EE PAIN r I ILI Et 1010 - "N. too :a E MOSS TRAL f50. F. S. LEGEND • MARK ON CATTLE GUARD • WOOD FENCE POST e IRON PIPE FOUND • IRON ROD FOUND O IRON ROD SET 1 NAIL FOUND 4 CALCULATED POINT N SHEET 3 OF 3 33.61 Acre Tract Jennings Boundary EXHIBIT A - TRACT 2 FN00-066 (A.Y.) Sept. 20, 2000. C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 A DESCRIPTION OF 33.61 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THE REMAINDER OF A 42.478 ACRE TRACT TO RICHARD C. JENNINGS AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT # 9558188 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a iron rod found on the east line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract being the northeast corner of the said tract, and being the northwest corner of South Creek Section Two, a subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 266 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas THENCE with the said east line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Two, the following three (3) courses: 1. S 02°36'29" W, 140.95 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. S 00°14'37" E, 902.66 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 3. S 01°03'27" E, passing at 29.03 feet the most northerly southwest corner of the said South Creek Section Two, being the northwest corner of South Creek Section Six, a subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet F, Slide 360 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, in all 93.21 feet to a iron rod with cap set at the north line of a 1.7 acre tract, to J & S Group as recorded in volume 2525, page 841 and Volume 2532, Page ddm623 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, THENCE leaving the said east line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the west line of the said South Creek Section Six, with the said north line of the 1.7 acre tract, the following five (5) courses: 1. N 88°15'15" W, 32.98 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. a distance of 159.80 feet with an arc of a curve to the right whose central angle is 07°02'24", with a radius of 1300.56 feet and whose chord bears N 84°44'03" W, a distance of 159.70 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 3. N 81°12'51" W, 275.21 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 4. a distance of 212.01 feet with an arc of a curve to the left whose central angle is 31°03'02", with a radius of 391.21 feet and whose chord bears S 83°15'43" W, a distance of 209.43 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 5. S 67°44'12" W, 252.62 feet to a iron rod with cap set, at the west line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the east line of a 153.25 acre tract to Carl Anton Forsman, as recorded in Volume 128, Page 456, and Volume 208, Page 462 of the Deed Records of Williamson County Texas, THENCE with the said west line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the east line of the 153.25 acre tract the following two courses: 1. N 07°00'43" W, 143.78 feet to a iron rod with cap set: 2. N 14°36'27" W, 1460.07 feet to a point on a cattle guard: 3. N 14°38'22" W, 312.87 feet to a point, on the north line of the said remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the south line of a 27.61 acre tract to James J. Hoover, as recorded in volume 649, page 114 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the approximate centerline of Lake Creek, Page 1 of 2 33.61 Aore Tract Jennings Boundary FN00-066 (A.Y.) Sept. 20, 2000 C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 THENCE with the said north line of the remainder 42.478 acre tract, being the said south line of the 27.61 acre tract, being the south line of a 1.5 acre tract to Roger A. Miller & Suzanne B. Miller, as recorded in Volume 790, Page 892, being the south line of a 23.217 acre tract to Sue Hoover, as recorded in Volume 2137, Page 218 of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, and being the approximate centerline of Lake Creek, the following four (4) courses: 1. S 52°29'43" E, 613.25 feet to a point, 2. S 68°54'51" E, 325.04 feet to a point, 3. S 74°13'13" E, 365.00 feet to a point, 4. S 73°12'53" E, 240.68 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 33.61 acres of land more or Tess. THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property described herein is based upon a survey performed under my direction and supervision during September, 2000. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the 20th day of September, 2000 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 JOHN STRAWBRIDGE Page 2 of 2 John Straw: ridge Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas EXHIBIT A - TRACT 3 1.7 Acre Tract Southerly Portion of 3.416 Ac. Drainage Easement PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FN01-067 (JRS) April 20, 2001 C&B Project No. 050214.002.1.4047 A DESCRIPTION OF 1.7 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THE 1.7 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P., AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT # 2000066002 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1.7 Acres of land situated in the P.A. HOLDER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 297 in Williamson County, Texas, being the remainder of a called 8.904 acre tract described in the deed of record in Volume 2532, Page 623 and in Volume 2525, Page 841, Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, SAVE AND EXCEPT all that portion of land described and platted as SOUTH CREEK SECTION TWENTY, PHASE 1, recorded in Cabinet L, Slide 201, Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS That I, John Strawbridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that the above description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that the property described herein is based upon a survey performed under my direction and supervision during September, 2000. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL at Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the 20th day of April, 2001 A.D. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 901 South Mopac Blvd., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78746 Page 1 of 1 John Strawbridge Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4283 - State of Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS § § § COUNTY OF TRAVIS EXHIBIT B That Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., the outright owners of the certain tract of land described in Document Number 2000066004, Document Number 2000065504, and Document Number 2000066002 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas (the "Property") do hereby state that there are no lien holders of the Property. THE STA lh OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TRAVIS This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2001, by Terry E. Mitchell, Vice President of CHTEX of Texas, Inc., a Delaware corporation, sole general partner of Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of said partnership and corporation. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Name: Notary Public — State of Texas Page 1 Exhibit "B" EXHIBIT "C" DEVELOPMENT AREA "A" - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The development areas labeled "Single Family Detached Residential" as shown on the attached Exhibit "K" contain approximately 88 net developable acres. The development standards for the "Single Family Detached Residential" development areas shall be as follows: 1. PERMITTED USES 1.1 Residential Uses. (a) Single family residential, as defined in Section 1 of this Development Plan, shall be permitted. 1.2 Non-residential uses. (a) Conservation areas (b) Outdoor recreationallathletic facilities (c) Outdoor swimming pools (d) Parks, playgrounds and playfields (e) Streams, lakes, waterways, or their drainageways (f} Wetlands (g) Club houses and community centers (h) Trail systems 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (see lot diagram attachment for Lot 'A' and Lot `B') 2.1 Lot Size. Lot Type 'A' Minimum lot size 4,500 SF 5,250 SF on comer lot Minimum lot width 45 ft at the building line 50 ft on corner lot TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "C'. Lot Type `B' Minimum lot size 5,500 SF 6,050 SF on a corner lot Minimum lot width 50 ft at the building line 55 ft on corner lot 2.2 Height Regulations. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35), exclusive of Appurtenances. 2.3 Minimum Setbacks. (i) Front Yard. There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than ten feet (10') from the front property line to the closest projection of the building face not including roof overhangs, provided that dry utilities are located in a private alley or public utility easement which abuts the private alley. In the event that dry utilities are located in the front of the building, there shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than fifteen (15') from the property line to the closest projection of the building face, not including roof overhangs. There shall be a minimum of twenty foot (20') setback from the front property line to the front of a garage to allow for permitted parking in the paved surface area of the front yard for lots that do not have private alley access. (ii) Interior Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than five feet (5') from the walls of building or accessory building to the interior side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iii) Street Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than ten feet (10') from the walls of building to the street side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the street side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iv) Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the rear most wall of the dwelling unit to the back property line and five feet (5') from rearmost wall of the garage to the back of the property line. Parking is permitted within the driveway of the rear yard. If the driveway in the rear yard is located behind the garage, the garage setback shall be increased to twenty feet (20'). The driveway may be located adjacent to the garage on a concrete slab and shall have a depth of no less than twenty feet (20'). In the event that dry utilities are located within a public utility easement abutting a private alley, there shall be a rear yard setback of not less than twenty feet (20'). The tandem parking provided in the driveway shall be credited towards Owner's required number of parking spaces. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "C"_ 2.4 Garage Regulations. Garages may be either attached or detached and shall be accessible from a public street or private alley. 3. PARKING REQUIREMENTS The number of parking spaces for Single Family Detached Residential shall be provided in accordance with the standards set forth in Exhibit "F" to this agreement. The parking and loading requirements for all other uses shall be in accordance with the Code. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Exhibit "C". EXHIBIT "D" DEVELOPMENT AREA "B" - SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL (RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM/ RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The development areas labeled "Single Family Attached Residential" on the attached Exhibit "K", consists of approximately 22 net developable acres. The development standards for the Single Family Attached development areas shall be as follows: 1. PERMITTED USES 1.1 Residential Uses. (a) Residential Condominium, as defined in Section 1 of the Development Plan (b) Residential Townhouse, as defined in Section 1 of the Development Plan 1.2 Non- residential uses. (a) Conservation areas (b) Outdoor recreational/athletic facilities (c) Outdoor swimming pools (d) Parks, playgrounds and playfields (e) Streams, lakes, waterways, or their drainageways (f) Wetlands (g) Club houses and community centers (h) Trail systems 2. RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (see lot diagram attachment) 2.1 Lot Size and Lot Width. Minimum lot size 4,500 SF 4,950 SF on corner lot Minimum lot width 50 ft at the building line 55 ft on corner lot TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "D" 2.2, Density. The overall density for any Residential Condominium area shall not exceed sixteen (16) units per developable acre. (The overall density for Development Area "D" shall not exceed three hundred fifty (350) units.) 2.3 Height Regulations. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35'), exclusive of appurtenances. 2.4 Minimum Setbacks. (a) Front Yard. There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than ten feet (10') from the front property line to the closest projection of the building face not including roof overhangs, provided that dry utilities are located in a private alley or public utility easement which abuts the private alley. In the event that dry utilities are located in the front of the building, there shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than fifteen (15') from the property line to the closest projection of the building face, not including roof overhangs. (b) Interior Side Yard. There shall be a side yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the walls of the building to the interior side property line, not including a stoop, covered porch, covered terrace, balcony or bay. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (c) Street Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than ten feet (10') from the walls of building to the street side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the street side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (d) Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the rear most wall of the dwelling unit to the back property line and five feet (5') from rearmost wall of the garage or carport to the back of the property line. Parking is permitted within the paved surface area of the rear yard. If the driveway in the rear yard is located behind the garage, the garage setback shall be increased to twenty feet (20'). The driveway may be located adjacent to the garage on a concrete slab and shall have a depth of no less than twenty feet (20'). In the event that dry utilities are located within a public utility easement abutting a private alley, there shall be a rear yard setback of not less than twenty feet (20'). TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "D". 2.5. Spacing. Each building shall be at least fifteen feet (15') from the nearest dwelling unit. The roof overhang may extend two feet (2') into the side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. 2.6 Garage Regulations. Garages may be either attached or detached and accessible from a private alley or private interior drive. 2.7 Private Interior Drives. (a) Single Family Attached development areas may include private interior drives which shall serve the single family attached residents. Private interior drives, if any, shall be maintained by a Property Owners Association. All private interior drives shall be in compliance with all City fire and emergency regulations. Private interior drives shall provide a means for a vehicle to turn around for every one hundred fifty feet (150') in length. (b) All private interior drives shall be a minimum width of twenty-two feet (22'). 3. RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (see lot diagram attachment) 3.1 Lot Size and Lot Width. Minimum lot size 2,500 SF 2,750 SF on comer lot Minimum lot width 20 ft at the building line 25 ft on corner lot 3.2 Maximum Dwellings Per Lot. No more than one dwelling unit per lot shall be permitted. 3.3 Density. The overall density for any Residential Townhouse area shall not exceed sixteen (16) units per developable acre. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Exhibit "D". 3.4 Height Regulations. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35'), exclusive of appurtenances. 3.5 Minimum Setbacks. (i) Front Yard. There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than ten feet (10') from the front property line to the closest projection of the building face not including roof overhangs, provided that dry utilities are located in a private alley or public utility easement which abuts the private alley. In the event that dry utilities are located in the front of the building, there shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than fifteen (15') from the property line to the closest projection of the building face, not including roof overhangs. (ii) Interior Side Yard. No setback is required if a common wall is provided or five feet (5') where no common wall is provided. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the interior side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iii) Street Side Yard. There shall be a side yard of not less than five feet (5') from the walls of building to the street side property line. The roof overhang may extend two feet into the street side yard setback provided no easements are encroached upon. (iv) Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard setback of not less than ten feet (10') from the rear most wall of the dwelling unit to the back property line and five feet (5') from rear most wall of the garage to the back of the property line. Parking is permitted within the driveway of the rear yard. If the driveway in the rear yard is located behind the garage, the garage setback shall be increased to twenty feet (20'). The driveway may be located adjacent to the garage on a concrete slab and shall have a depth of no less than twenty feet (20'). The tandem parking provided in the driveway shall be credited towards Owner's required number of parking spaces. 3.6 Garage/Carport Regulations. (i) Garages or carports shall be either attached or detached and accessible from a private alley. (ii) Carports, if any, shall be effectively screened from public rights -of way. 4. PARKING REQUIREMENTS The number of parking and loading spaces for Residential Condominiums and Residential Townhouse development areas shall be provided in accordance with the standards set TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 4 Exhibit "D". forth in Exhibit "F" to this agreement. The parking and loading requirements for all other uses shall be in accordance with the Code. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 5 Exhibit "D"_ EXHIBIT "E" DEVELOPMENT AREA "E" - OPEN SPACE CRITERIA AND STANDARDS Open Space is a tract of land provided as a general benefit for the community. The open space for Turtle Creek Village PUD, as shown on the attached Exhibit "K", comprises approximately thirty-five (35) acres, including the 100 -year flood plain. Common open space, as identified on the attached Exhibit "K", may be usable for recreational purposes or may provide visual, aesthetic and environmental amenities. 1. PERMITTED USES (a) Conservation areas (b) Outdoor recreational/athletic facilities (c) Outdoor swimming pools (d) Parks, playgrounds and playfields (e) Streams, lakes, waterways, or their drainageways (f) Wetlands (g) CIub houses and community centers (h) Trail systems for pedestrian and bicycle traffic (i) Off-street parking 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2.1 Maximum height of buildings. No building shall exceed thirty-five feet (35'), exclusive of appurtenances. 2.2 Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size shall be thirty-five hundred (3,500) square feet, except for landscaped lots in the right-of-way, which may be smaller, as approved as a part of the final plat. 2.3 Minimum Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be forty feet (40'). 2.4 Minimum Setbacks. (i) Front Yard. Fifteen feet (15'). (ii) Side Yard. Ten feet (10'). (iii) Rear Yard. Ten feet (10'). TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "E" 2.5 Linear Park. Linear parks shall generally be a minimum of forty feet (40) in width but in no event less than twenty-five feet (25) in width. 3. COMMON OPEN SPACE CONVEYANCE Common open space and structures thereon must be either: (i) conveyed to a public body, if said public body agrees to accept conveyance and to maintain the common open space and buildings, structures, or improvements which have been placed on it; or (ii) conveyed to a Property Owners Association or some other party responsible for maintaining common buildings, areas and land within the subdivision. The common open space shall be restricted to the uses specified on the final plat and which provide for the maintenance of the common open space in a manner which assures its long term maintenance for its intended purpose. 4. PARK LAND DEDICATION 4.1 Private Park Land. Owner will designate a minimum of 1.5 acres out of the Common Open Space, as shown on Exhibit "K", as private park land to be maintained by the Property Owners Association for the area. The private park land may contain open space improvements such as a swimming pool, amenity center and other related uses. In the event that Owner elects to change the location of the 1.5 acres to another location on the Property, which location shall be mutually agreed upon between Owner and the Director of Parks and Recreation Department, the revision shall be considered a minor change, as defined in Article III of this Agreement. 4.2 Park Land Dedication Requirements. Owner will dedicate not less than 15 acres out of the common Open Space to the City for the purpose of creating a pedestrian and bicycle trail within the Turtle Creek Village PUD. Owner will provide the City with a dedication deed for the public park land within 15 business days from the time a written request is received from the City's Director of Parks and Recreation Department. The City will maintain all dedicated public park land after the aforementioned conveyance by Owner. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "E" 4.3 Total Parkland Requirements. Owner shall provide a combined total acreage for private park and public park of no less than thirty-five (35) acres. 5. EASEMENTS WITHIN OPEN SPACE 5.1 Owner shall be permitted to locate a public utility easement within any area of public open space that abuts Owner's residential development. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 3 Exhibit "E" EXHIBIT "F' PARKING REGULATIONS 1. PARKING REGULATIONS 1.1 Parking and Storage of Certain Vehicles. Automotive vehicles or trailers not bearing current license plates and state motor vehicles inspection stickers shall be parked or stored on any residential area only in completely enclosed buildings. No recreational vehicle, trailer or major recreational equipment shall be parked or stored on any lot except that it shall be enclosed in a building. No commercial vehicles larger than a standard three- quarter (3/4) ton pickup truck or standard two -axle passenger van shall be permitted to remain overnight on any Lot or to be parked on any roadway within the Property. 1.2 Single Family Detached Residential Parking Regulations. Development of any use permitted in the Single Family Detached Residential areas shall comply with Section 11.321 of the Code. 1.3 Residential Condominium Parking Regulations. (i) Development of any use permitted in the Residential Condominium development areas shall provide parking spaces equal to the following: a minimum of two parking spaces for up to two bedrooms and one additional space for units that contain three or more bedrooms, which shall be located either in a garage, on the driveway or in a convenient location to the building. Tandem parking spaces provided on the driveway shall be credited towards parking space requirements provided that the driveway is Iocated directly in front of the garage of a dwelling unit and that driveway provides direct access to that dwelling unit from the garage. (ii) Residential Condominium development areas shall include garage parking for residents, which shall be accessible from private driveways or alleys. (iii) Additional parking shall also be provided for guests and visitors of residents. A minimum of five percent (5%) of the total parking spaces that are required for the condominium residences shall be provided for additional guest and visitor parking. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "F" 1.4 Residential Townhouse Parking Regulations Residential Townhouse development areas shall include covered parking (garage or carport) for residents, which shall be accessible from private alleys. Development of any use permitted on the Residential Townhouse development areas shall provide (i) a minimum of one (1) covered parking space per dwelling unit and (ii) one (1) additional parking space per dwelling unit, which may be located on the driveway behind or next to the garage or carport. Residential Townhouse units with three or more bedrooms shall provide one additional parking space at a location to be approved by the City Director of Planning. 1.5 Shared Parking. The City may approve as appropriate for two or more non-residential uses to share parking spaces. Any parking spaces that the City allows to be shared count toward the number of parking spaces each must provide. 1.6 Daycare Services and Primary Educational Facilities. Development of any use permitted for daycare and educational uses shall provide one parking space for each employee. 1.7 Open Space Parking Regulations Parking for open space uses is provided from adjacent on -street parking unless, at the Owner's option, off-street parking is provided within an open space lot. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 2 Exhibit "F" EXHIBIT "G" DAYCARE AND PRIMARY PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Any daycare or public educational facilities within the Turtle Creek Village PUD shall be in compliance with the Code. TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE PUD Page 1 Exhibit "G" TURTLE CREEK PUD EXHIBIT "H" [See Attached Street Diagrams] Page 1 Exhibit "H" Street Tree 1-- D co Q c p. O Lq 0 OD 4-, 0 v ternative Loca ca 747, a) 0 U EL 0 (6 m v rn +- 7 m 7 N d CL O Lq 0 CO • v Residential Collector 0 N t - m N 7 Median Tree Boulevard Collector A.W. Grimes Blvd. ROW 0 LL U lL CV (Fronting A.W. Grimes Blvd. with jogging trail) Access Lane e 0 ao A.W. Grimes Blvd. ROW o w 3 L- c 0) o c 0 o c-) 0 H O m v!!L. J 0 u_ IL (NI Y 0) m .0) 0) o 1 D 38 c U °, .c Street Tree U)W o C Hca Q C Q C 1.0 0) oco a) D 0) CT) U 0 (1) c 0 0 c 0 Li - (1) T 0 J W V U O 0 N a O 0 cu C U 11111=4•11011•1 / ld OP!S r) > co bo ei Q. to y 0 S cto h V"c cII O N C O N C > N i "3 O . z=• gam LI 0 J LL , O CU p J E 11) N O r` = N U Cv in ld P!S pieKp►s �aaa4 13�2i1S a) 0 a) 2 a) -o co ': O i N O O a) o CCO L C 4) a) x a) 0 Ic c .c O U CV CO 0 CO .� H _moi O 43 a) RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or puts of the text on this page was not clwly for satisfectory recordation. } J J o a c m N o O 0 0 X 0 -0 O a)_ 0 �m00 O• w CO E _g y H y ett 0 op 4 73 1344.4o c ' 43ij Y .= z ld aP!s 3{Oegas pief app iopep. r ,5 177131s " >Oeq;as apis JO JO Ui ,g O - LL (n L Ci) O i Er) O (NI C U to 2 r J to r+ i // A ///, ///I. zeil // re/ w 11111 regias pieA ep!s;sails .0L 1JEIHLS • cO 0 0 0 (0 N • Q)-0 ca C N O 0 O tom X@ RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or parts of the text on this page was not de rly legible fin xasisfactnry wordation. LOT TYPE 'A' . r 1 pieA apps LL id aP!S LL O O -� CD • ti) L2 poeq;as apis loua;ui ,q ,92 (0 1- 1 1 L _ 1 J req;as pieA app aanS .0 L 133HIS c (1) 0 o 0 c cs 112 o v CO = -o o i3 a3 U 0 Cll 2 E in '03 @ ix n 3 RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or pans of the text on this page was not clearly kgihle for satisfactory recordation. 0) c NTERIOR DRIVE ALLEY OR PRIVATE ld eP!S v 18 apis Joualui ,c9 _ �I E a ' co C mf E-0 I 0.5 _Lij _ m.0 U Ig — 5 0 0 co Cl. m N 1 O0 "' C N 0 0 N CO C N m U O O N -0 Q c O i 0 N V O 0)0)0 �E-o T -5 x .s C 0n )toegias plea app lawig ,o . STREET OR PEDESTRIAN WAY CE < o cD (9 : Q o —U 0 o ma' -o RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or parts of the Matt on this page was not clearly I 'hie At satisfactory recordation. R.O.W Street Tree 8.5' Street tree (plant in center of strip) Measured to face of curb Sidewalk Continuous planter strip Typical Planting Strip Exhibit "1" EXHIBIT J TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXHIBIT J Engineering Company TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Milburn Homes — Turtle Creek Village Williamson County, Texas I�E.OF phi s - *.• �a '.4c,4 *, JAMES MICHAEL HEATH •i 78133 ra /5/o/ Performed for: Milburn Homes 12554 Riata Vista Circle Second Floor Austin, TX 78727 by: Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 100 East Anderson Lane Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78752 Phone (512) 821-2081 FAX (512) 821-2085 April 20, 2001 Revised June 15,2001 RECORDER,, MEMORANDUM All or parts tithe text on this page was not 404 AV* y remrdati®ria ngineering Company' Table of Contents List of Figures ii List of Tables Section One: Introduction 1 Overview 1 Study Methodology 4 Roadway Level of Service 5 Section Two: Development Year - 2006 7 Background Traffic 7 Trip Generation 7 Trip Distribution 7 Area Roadway Facilities 7 Intersection Analysis 9 Section Three: Review of Proposed Geometric Design Standards 15 Roadway Traffic Volumes 15 Literature Review 16 Literature Review 17 Proposed Roadway Type 18 Section Four: Findings and Recommendations 21 Section Five: Certification Statement 22 References: 23 Appendix 37 Appendix A: Intersection Analysis Sheets Appendix B: Signal Warrant Analysis Sheets Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15,2001 Page i List of Figures Figure 1: Local Roadway Network 2 Figure 2: Site Trip Distribution 3 Figure 3: Intersection Locations on A.W Grimes 10 Figure 4: Future Conditions At Intersection 1 11 Figure 5: Future Conditions at A.W Grimes Blvd & Logan Dr 12 Figure 6: Future Conditions At Intersection 2 13 Figure 7: Future Conditions At Intersection 3 14 Figure 8: Daily Traffic on Development Roadways 16 Figure 9: Public Circulation Plan 20 List of Tables Table 1: Land Use Summary 1 Table 2: LOS Criteria for Roadway Arterials1 5 Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections (1) 6 Table 4: LOS Criteria for Two -Way Stop Controlled Intersections (1) 6 Table 5: Site Generated Trips 8 Table 6: Year 2006 Levels of Service 9 Table 7: Community Street Width Standards 17 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15,2001 Page ii MILBURN HOME SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS June 15, 2001 Section One: introduction Overview The Turtle Creek Village Planned Unit Development is located in southeast Williamson County, within the limits of the City of Round Rock. It is proposed as a Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), with the land uses listed in Table 1. Generally described, the site is located north of the Gattis School Road, south of Highway 79, east of Green Lawn Blvd, and west of South Creek. Access to the development will be along the proposed A.W. Grimes Blvd which will run through the site. It is anticipated that the site will be fully developed by 2006. Projected traffic volumes are based on information taken from traffic counts performed on August 15, 2000. Proposed land uses are provided in Table 1. Table 1: Land Use Summary Size Land Use 422 Dwellings Single Family Homes 273 Dwelling Units Single Family Attached Homes 250 Students Day Care Facility 800 Student Elementary Figure 1 shows the location of the Milburn Home Subdivision and the surrounding roadway network. Other than the completion of A.W Grimes Blvd, the roadway network surrounding this site is not expected to significantly change from the time of this study to the build -out completion date; therefore, the build -out year analysis will assume the existing network with modifications to include the subdivision and A.W Grimes Blvd. The trips generated by this site are distributed according to driveway accessibility as shown in Figure 2. One of the primary goals of Milburn Homes is to design a Traditional Neighborhood Development that incorporates mixed residential areas and civic areas. The Turtle Creek Village TND includes single family detached housing, single family attached housing, an elementary school, a daycare center, and public space. One of the major goals of a TND is to be pedestrian oriented. To accomplish this goal, street pattern and design is used to reduce vehicle travel speeds and encourage pedestrian activity. Streets may be smaller than in conventional development and more varied in size and form to control traffic and give character to the neighborhood. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 200I Page 1 The projected traffic along the roadway segments in the development was analyzed to determine the roadway size needed to serve vehicle traffic and encourage pedestrian activity. In addition, the intersections along A.W Grimes Blvd within the subdivision were analyzed to determine operating Level of Service (LOS), and recommend improvements so that these intersections operate at an acceptable LOS. Figure 1: Local Roadway Network Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or parts of the text on this page was not dimly kaihAe or alsOlfgeeegy dation. June 15, 2001 Page 2 Figure 2: Site Trip Distribution Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 4 3 - RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or puts of the text on this page was not <lelly it0 !e fma ietisf'wnry recordation. June 15, 2001 Page 3 Study Methodology The following information provides a summary of the field data and technical analysis used for this Traffic Impact Study. The methodology is based upon a thorough analysis of existing and projected site -generated traffic on area roadways. The study methodology is as follows: 1. Review the proposed land use information for this site with Milburn Homes representatives. 2. Using the Williamson County Long Range Travel Demand Model, obtain 2006 Daily traffic volumes and Peak hour traffic volume projections for the AM and PM period on A.W. Grimes Boulevard between Highway 79 and Gattis School Road. 3. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (T1 E) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, estimate site trip generation for the AM and PM Peak traffic periods for the Milburn Home Subdivision. 4. Using Aerial Photographs and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, estimate site trip generation for the development adjacent to Milburn Home Subdivision that will be using the site as access to A.W. Grimes Blvd. 5. Develop trip distribution percentage factors for the Milburn Home site based on the Williamson County Long ange Travel Demand Model and proposed site access points. 6. Distribute traffic generated by the Milburn Home site onto area roadways using the above noted trip distribution factors. 7. Analyze the four intersection access points along A.W. Grimes using the methodology found in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209, 1994 ed. (I): 8. Formulate improvement recommendations, if required, for access to the site. 9. Calculate the vehicular traffic along all the roadway segments in the site. 10. Determine the residential street type and width for each roadway segment 11. Review the proposed circulation plan to determine if the proposed roadway cross sections are adequate to serve projected traffic volumes. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 4 Roadway Level of Service The 1997 Highway Capacity Manual, (1) uses Level of Service (LOS) as the method by which the quality of traffic flow is described. LOS describes operational conditions in six levels based upon speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. These six levels are given the letters "A" through "F" and are given different descriptions and defining criteria depending on the roadway element analyzed. The roadway elements within the study area include arterial roadways, signalized intersections, and stop -controlled intersections. Table 2 presents the criteria used to identify arterial roadway LOS. Arterial LOS is based on the average travel speed in miles per hour. Arterial LOS is further subdivided based on the classification of the arterial analyzed. Thus large arterials, with higher posted speed limits, are expected to have higher speeds and the LOS criteria are defined accordingly. Table 2: LOS Criteria for Roadway Arterials' LOS "A" represents free flow conditions. Drivers travel at desired speed and are virtually unaffected by other vehicles. With LOS "B", other vehicles in the traffic stream become noticeable. Under LOS "C", the traffic stream significantly affects a driver's behavior. LOS "D" represents high-density traffic flow where speed and maneuverability are severely restricted and poor levels of comfort and convenience are experienced. LOS "E" generally describes a traffic stream at capacity where traffic is flowing but at a very slow rate, and any additional vehicles or unusual conditions will cause the system to break down. LOS "F" depicts a breakdown state where stop and go conditions and excessive queues form. LOS criteria for traffic signals are based on the average control delay per vehicle. Control delay includes deceleration and acceleration delay, queue move -up time, and stopped delay. These criteria are shown in Table 3. Thus, if the average control delay for vehicles at an intersection is fifty five seconds or less, the intersection is defined as operating at a LOS "D" or better. Stopped delay of fifty five through eighty seconds represent LOS "E" and values greater than eighty seconds define LOS "F". Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 5 Arterial Classifcation I II III IV Range of free-flow speeds (mph) 45 to 55 35 to 45 30 to 35 25 to 35 Typical free-flow speeds (mph) 50 40 33 30 Level of Service Average Travel Speed (MPH) A 42 35 30 25 B 34 28 24 19 C 27 22 18 13 D 21 17 14 9 E 16 13 10 7 F <16 <13 <10 <7 LOS "A" represents free flow conditions. Drivers travel at desired speed and are virtually unaffected by other vehicles. With LOS "B", other vehicles in the traffic stream become noticeable. Under LOS "C", the traffic stream significantly affects a driver's behavior. LOS "D" represents high-density traffic flow where speed and maneuverability are severely restricted and poor levels of comfort and convenience are experienced. LOS "E" generally describes a traffic stream at capacity where traffic is flowing but at a very slow rate, and any additional vehicles or unusual conditions will cause the system to break down. LOS "F" depicts a breakdown state where stop and go conditions and excessive queues form. LOS criteria for traffic signals are based on the average control delay per vehicle. Control delay includes deceleration and acceleration delay, queue move -up time, and stopped delay. These criteria are shown in Table 3. Thus, if the average control delay for vehicles at an intersection is fifty five seconds or less, the intersection is defined as operating at a LOS "D" or better. Stopped delay of fifty five through eighty seconds represent LOS "E" and values greater than eighty seconds define LOS "F". Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 5 For signalized intersection operation, LOS "A" represents very low delay; most vehicles do not stop at all. With LOS "B", more vehicles stop than LOS "A", increasing the average delay. Under LOS "C", the number of vehicles stopping is significant; however, many still pass through the intersection without stopping. LOS "D" describes conditions where congestion is readily apparent with many vehicles stopping and individual cycle failures (i.e., not all vehicles waiting in the intersection queue are able to get through the intersection on the first green indication) are noticeable. LOS "E" generally describes operations with poor progression, long cycle lengths and frequent cycle failures. LOS "F" describes unacceptable operations which include many cycle failures caused by arrival flows rates exceeding intersection capacity. Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections (1) Level of Service Average Control Delay (seciveh.) A <10 B >l0 and < 20 C >20and<35 D >35and<55 E >55 and < 80 F >80 Stop controlled intersections are analyzed in a similar manner; however, LOS is based on total delay per vehicle. The values that define LOS, shown in Table 4, are more restrictive than those for signalized intersections because it is assumed that drivers stopped at signalized intersections are able to relax while drivers waiting at stop signs must remain alert and continue to move ahead in the queue. Total delay includes both stopped delay and time spent in the queue waiting to enter the intersection. Two-way stop controlled intersections with the minor street average total delay greater than thirty seconds identifies LOS "E" or worse. Table 4• LOS Criteria for Two -Way Stop Controlled Intersections (1) Level of Service Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A <10 B >10and<15 C >15 and < 25 D >25 and < 35 E >35 and < 50 F >50 For this study, the criteria for minimum acceptable traffic conditions is Level of Service "D". Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 6 Section Two: Development Year - 2006 A technical approach for simulating future travel demand was utilized in evaluating the roadway system in and around the Milburn Home Subdivision. Information used to develop the projection of future traffic for this area is documented in the following sections of the report. Background Traffic Projected traffic volumes using the roadway system without the proposed project are commonly called background traffic volumes. For the Milburn Home Subdivision, projected background traffic along A. W Grimes is based upon the Williamson County Traffic Model. Background traffic for the adjacent subdivisions that will use the roads of the Turtle Creek Village TND is based on aerial photography and model outputs to determine land use and the ITE 's Trip Generation Manual, 6th edition (2) to determine trip generation Trip Generation Trip generation for the Milburn Home Subdivision site was calculated from information contained in ITE 's Trip Generation Manual, 6th edition (2). The number of trips generated is estimated using historical data from existing similar land uses. The trips generated for the Milburn Home Subdivision are shown in Table 5. Trip Distribution Trip distribution takes into account where vehicles using the site are going to or coming from based on the roadway network. External distribution percentages were arrived at by analyzing the projected background traffic volumes along A.W. Grimes Blvd. Internal distributions were arrived at by analyzing the physical layout of the subdivision and geometric characteristics of the roadway All future site traffic was then distributed using the determined percentages. The percentages shown in Figure 2 were applied to the site generated traffic for the year 2006. Area Roadway Facilities A.W. Grimes Blvd. The 2025 Austin Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan recommends a six lane Major Divided Arterial. The 2007 Round Rock Road Plan plans for A.W. Grimes Blvd to be initially constructed as a two lane cross section. As the build -out year coincides with the Round Rock roadway plan, the two lane cross-section is used in this analysis. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 7 Table 5: Site Generated Trips ITE CODE ITE DESCRIPTION UNITS UNADJUSTED TRIPS 24 HOUR AM PEAK PM PEAK TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT 210 Single Family Housing 421 DU 4,063 2,032 2,032 318 80 239 429 274 154 230 Residential Condominiums 273OCC.DU 1,796 899 899 141 24 117 169 113 56 520 Elementary School 800 Students 770 385 385 232 137 95 0 0 0 565 Day Care Center 250 Students 1,130 565 565 185 98 87 188 88 100 7,759 3,881 3,881 876 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 339 538 786 475 310 June 15, 2001 Page 8 Intersection Analysis This study analyzes four intersections along A.W Grimes (Figure 3): 1. A.W. Grimes & Intersection 1 2. A.W. Grimes & Logan Dr 3. A.W. Grimes & Intersection 3 4. A.W. Grimes & Intersection 4 The results of the intersection analysis are presented in Table 6. The geometry of these intersections are shown in Figures 4 through 8. The worksheets from this analysis are included in the Appendix A. The signal warrant analysis worksheets for the signalized intersections are included in Appendix B. Table 6: Year 2006 Levels of Service Intersection Type of Intersection Control Level of Service AM Peak PM Peak A.W Grimes & Intersection 1 Signalized B A A.W Grimes & Logan Dr Signalized A A A.W Grimes & Intersection 2 Unsignalized A A A.W Grimes & Intersection 3 Signalized C A All of the intersections studied operate at an acceptable Level of Service with the geometries and traffic control shown in Figures 4 through 7. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 9 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES c AC D D ; D LEGEND: OVERALL LOS: C AM PEAK A PM PEAK XCX)X AM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL FIGL A.W. Grimes Blvd cC STREET 1 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS 912C21 -7j1129 467C140j607 40��40 % 1281 C)(11-)11- 02 8)28 J 0(12)12 0(1)1 0(1)1 035)35 0(18)18 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES B A E D D • D -00 120(24)144 Nr) 7 C14)91 0(0)0" 7 0(0)0 134(27)161 88(18)106t Logan S 42. 08)8 r 429)51 170( 35)205 0(3 8)38 ��438 301<13 037 837 (199)1 LEGEND: OVERALL LOS: B AM PEAK C PM PEAK X(X)X AM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)TOTAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGROUND(SITE)TOTAL FI L A.W. Grimes Blvd & Logan St 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS 1046�198�124 17) 594 4670 0(46)46 0(30)3� Street O(54)54 0 (33)33 4 343(146)489 007(2 4)1241 07(234)1241 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES A A i 1 A A 1 A A LEGEND OVERALL LOS: C AM PEAK A PM PEAK X(X)X AM BACKGROUND(SITE)TOTAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGROUND(SITE)T❑TAL FT L -11 J • A.W. Grimes Blvd & STREET 2 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS' 1046(205)1251 46 ((17 29)596 0(4)4 0(4 0(19)19 0( 12)12 L 0(85)85 0(42)42 0(4)4 0(3)3 0(54)54 0(33)33 1 2(9)11 4(4)8 IQ 15(13)28 10(9)19 Street 3 } I � 0(145)145 19(17)36 0(63)63 343(49)392 1007(185)1192 5(4)9 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES E D D E A B E A C D D LEGEND: OVERALL LOS: D AM PEAK B PM PEAK X(X)X AM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL Y(Y)Y PM BACKGR❑UND(SITE)T❑TAL 1 L E "7 A.W. Grimes Blvd & STREET 3 2006 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS Section Three: Review of Proposed Geometric Design Standards The Public Circulation Plan provided to Alliance -Texas Engineering Comapny included the proposed residential street types and right of way allocation. This plan was reviewed to determine if the roadway widths were adequate for the type and amount of daily traffic on each roadway segment. The review of the development plan included the following. 1. Determine the twenty four (24) hour traffic volume on all roadway segments, 2. Review literature to determine minimum roadway widths, 3. Review proposed street type widths and classifications, and 4. Recommend roadway pavement widths. Roadway Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes on each roadway segment are based on the traffic generated by the TND and the background traffic calculated in the Intersection Analysis Section of the report. For this analysis, the 24 hour volume was used as the primary criteria to determine roadway classification and roadway width. The AM & PM peak period volumes were examined to ensure adequate roadway capacity during peak periods. Roadway size is typically based on functional classification and traffic volumes. Local residential roads primarily serve two major functions: providing access and conveying traffic. In designing roadways for these two functions, pavement widths have generally been over designed as a means to efficiently move vehicles. Unfortunately, high speeds and high traffic volumes often occur as a result. The high speeds and volumes typically run contrary to what residents along the roads desire. Roadway widths in Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TNDs) tend to be narrower than in typical developments with the goal of reducing travel speeds and traffic volumes. As a result, pedestrian activity is encouraged. Site traffic was distributed over the roadway network based on the site layout. In addition to site traffic, traffic from adjacent subdivisions may use the roads in The Lake Creek TND as a means to get to A.W. Grimes Boulevard. The two roads in the TND that will connect to the adjacent subdivisions are Willow Dr and Logan Drive. In addition to site traffic, it is anticipated that approximately 2,500 vehicles per day will use Willow Drive as a cut through route to A.W. Grimes Blvd. Additionally, approximately 4,700 vehicles per day will use Logan Drive to access A.W Grimes Boulevard. The traffic volumes on most of the roadway segments in the TND are shown in Figure 8. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 15 Section Three: Review of Proposed Geometric Design Standards The Public Circulation Plan provided to Alliance -Texas Engineering Comapny included the proposed residential street types and right of way allocation. This plan was reviewed to determine if the roadway widths were adequate for the type and amount of daily traffic on each roadway segment. The review of the development plan included the following. 1. Determine the twenty four (24) hour traffic volume on all roadway segments, 2. Review literature to determine minimum roadway widths, 3. Review proposed street type widths and classifications, and 4. Recommend roadway pavement widths. Roadway Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes on each roadway segment are based on the traffic generated by the TND and the background traffic calculated in the Intersection Analysis Section of the report. For this analysis, the 24 hour volume was used as the primary criteria to determine roadway classification and roadway width. The AM & PM peak period volumes were examined to ensure adequate roadway capacity during peak periods. Roadway size is typically based on functional classification and traffic volumes. Local residential roads primarily serve two major functions: providing access and conveying traffic. In designing roadways for these two functions, pavement widths have generally been over designed as a means to efficiently move vehicles. Unfortunately, high speeds and high traffic volumes often occur as a result. The high speeds and volumes typically run contrary to what residents along the roads desire. Roadway widths in Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TNDs) tend to be narrower than in typical developments with the goal of reducing travel speeds and traffic volumes. As a result, pedestrian activity is encouraged. Site traffic was distributed over the roadway network based on the site layout. In addition to site traffic, traffic from adjacent subdivisions may use the roads in The Turtle Creek Village TND as a means to get to A.W. Grimes Boulevard. The two roads in the TND that will connect to the adjacent subdivisions are Willow Dr and Logan Drive. In addition to site traffic, it is anticipated that approximately 2,500 vehicles per day will use Willow Drive as a cut through route to A.W. Grimes Blvd. Additionally, approximately 4,700 vehicles per day will use Logan Drive to access A.W Grimes Boulevard. The traffic volumes on most of the roadway segments in the TND are shown in Figure 8. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 15 Figure 8: Daily Traffic on Development Roadways Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or parts of the text on this page was not clearly lcgihle for atisfactory recordation. June 15, 2001 Page 16 Literature Review Recently many communities throughout the country have adopted reduced street width standards. A review of these standards was undertaken to determine the minimum pavement width acceptable to various communities through out the country. Residential Street widths for a number of communities are list below in Table 7. This data has been compiled from "The Congress For The New Urbanism," Transportation Task Force Initiative. As Table 7 illustrates, numerous communities have adopted street width standards of 20-21' with parking on one side and 24-28' with parking on both sides. Table 7: Community Street Width Standards State Jurisdiction Standard Arizona Phoenix 28' — Parking both sides California Santa Rosa 26' parking One Side 20' No Parking Novata 24' — Parking Both Sides Delaware Delaware DOT 21' — Parking One Side — Local St 22' parking One Side —Minor Col. Maryland Howard and Charles Co. 24' Parking Unregulated Michigan Birmingham 26' Parking Both Sides 20' Parking One Side Oregon Eugene 12' One Way Alley 16' Two Way Alley Portland 26' Parking Both Sides 20' Parking One Side Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 17 Proposed Roadway Type A proposed Public Circulation Plan was provided for review (Figure 9). A review of the circulation plan, literature review, and the 24 hour traffic on each of the road segments indicates that the roadway facilities proposed are adequately sized for the traffic projected. Below is a list of the proposed roadway types and a brief description of each. Standard Residential Collector, (65' ROW) The proposed standard residential collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, in sixty five feet (65') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. As with the alternative residential collector, the stall depth and travel lane width should be increased to eight feet (8') and twelve feet (12'), respectively. Boulevard Collector (74' ROW) The proposed Boulevard Collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, and a median of at least nine feet (9') in width, in seventy four feet (74') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (105. Parallel parking is provided on both sides of the street Alternative Residential Collector (59' ROW) The proposed alternative residential collector cross section includes thirty four feet (34') of traveled way, with onsite parallel parking, in fifty nine feet (59') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Using the information presented in Residential Streets (ULI, ASCE, NAHB 1990), we would recommend a stall depth of eight feet (8') and a travel lane width of nine feet (9') to accommodate the needs on this street. Local Street (55' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes thirty feet (30') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty five feet (55') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 18 Alternative Local Street (52' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes twenty seven feet (27') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty feet of right of way. Design speed is twenty (20) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Access Street (45' R.O.W to 58' ROW )(One -Way) The proposed Access Street cross section includes twenty feet (20') of traveled way with parallel parking, in forty feet (45'-58') of right of way. Design speed is fifteen (15) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five feet (5'). Parallel parking is allowed on one side of the street in the traveled way. It is recommended that the Access Street have parking restricted to one side of the road. Two Way Alley (20' Access Easement) The proposed Access Street cross section includes sixteen feet (16') of traveled way with parking prohibited, in twenty feet (20') of the access easement. Design speed is five (5) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five feet (5'). On street parking is prohibited in the traveled way. The traveled way should be kept clear at all times. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 19 Proposed Roadway Type A proposed Public Circulation Plan was provided for review (Figure 9). A review of the circulation plan, literature review, and the 24 hour traffic on each of the road segments indicates that the roadway facilities proposed are adequately sized for the traffic projected. Below is a list of the proposed roadway types and a brief description of each. Standard Residential Collector, (65' ROW) The proposed standard residential collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, in sixty five feet (65') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. As with the alternative residential collector, the stall depth and travel lane width should be increased to eight feet (8') and twelve feet (12'), respectively. Boulevard Collector (74' ROW) The proposed Boulevard Collector cross section includes forty feet (40') of traveled way (2 x 20' lanes), with parallel parking, and a median of at least nine feet (9') in width, in seventy four feet (74') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parallel parking is provided on both sides of the street Alternative Residential Collector (59' ROW) The proposed alternative residential collector cross section includes thirty four feet (34') of traveled way, with onsite parallel parking, in fifty nine feet (59') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Using the information presented in Residential Streets (ULI, ASCE, NAHB 1990), we would recommend a stall depth of seven feet (7') and a travel lane width of ten feet (10') to accommodate the needs on this street. Local Street (55' ROW) The proposed local street cross section includes thirty feet (30') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty five feet (55') of right of way. Design speed is twenty five (25) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 18 Alternative Local Street (52' ROW) The proposed Local street cross section includes twenty seven feet (27') of traveled way with onsite parallel parking, in fifty feet aright of way. Design speed is twenty (20) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be ten feet (10'). Parking is provided on both sides of the street through parallel stalls. Access Street (45' R.O.W to 58' ROW )(One -Way) The proposed Access Street cross section includes twenty feet (20') of traveled way with parallel parking, in forty feet (45`-58') of right of way. Design speed is fifteen (15) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five feet (5'). Parallel parking is allowed on one side of the street in the traveled way. It is recommended that the Access Street have parking restricted to one side of the road. Two Way Alley (20' Access Easement) The proposed Access Street cross section includes sixteen feet (16') of traveled way with parking prohibited, in twenty feet (20') of the access easement. Design speed is five (5) miles per hour. Intersection curb radii are proposed to be five (5'). On street parking is prohibited in the traveled way. The traveled way should be kept clear at all times. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 19 Figure 9: Public Circulation Plan Residential Streets ` =tU . ° a d i (5, .7— d R n `offa, h 5 S i e 0- w u 3/2 u a� 1 g aPi ea.�y�a a ma 3R ar fR h� Turtle Creek Village Traffic impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company 1 RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or puts of the text on this page was not Beady legible for satiefasto, , mcordation. June 15, 2001 Page 20 Section Four: Findings and Recommendations The proposed Turtle Creek Village TND and its interaction with the surrounding roadway network has been evaluated in this study. The five intersections along A.W. Grime have been analyzed to determine the Level of Service (LOS) and identify improvements necessary for these intersections to operate at an acceptable LOS. Additionally, the roadway segments were analyzed to determine the appropriate pavement width for each roadway segment in the development. A listing of all the improvements necessary is provided in the section below: Geometric Improvements (Year 2006) 1. Left Turn Bays recommended on A.W. Grimes Blvd at all intersections where left turns are permitted 2. All side streets on A.W. Grimes Blvd should have separate right turn bays to separate right turning vehicles from thru and left turning vehicles The following traffic control improvements are necessary for the intersections to operate at an acceptable LOS: 1. Signalize the intersection of A.W Grimes & Street 1 2. Signalize the intersection of A.W Grimes & Logan Dr. 3. Signalize the intersection of A.W Grimes & Street 5 The Circulation Plan provided to Alliance -Texas Engineering Company for review was analyzed to determine if the proposed residential street types were adequate for the developments traffic volumes. Additionally, a literature review was performed to determine the minimum pavement widths of various street types in use nationally. The analysis shows that the proposed residential street types are adequate for the traffic using these facilities. Following is a listing of the street types to be used in this development and the right of way and pavement width associated with each. • Alternative Residential Collector (59' ROW) — 34' Pavement • Standard Residential Collector, (65' ROW) — 40' Pavement • Boulevard Collector (74' ROW) - 40' Pavement • Standard Local Street (55' ROW) — 27 ' Pavement • Alternative Local Street (52' ROW) — 30 ' Pavement • Access Street (45' to 58' ROW) — 20 ` Pavement • Two Way Alley (20' ROW) — 16" Pavement Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 21 Section Five: Certification Statement I hereby certify that this report complies with applicable technical requirements of the City of Round Rock and is complete to the best of my knowledge. Alliance -Texas Engineering Company el H:.th, P.E. Principal Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 22 References: 1. Highway Capacity Manual, (SR 209), Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1994. 2. Trip Generation, An Informal Report. 5th. Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C., January 1991. 3. "Synchro 5.0 ", Trafficware, 2001. 4. Austin Metropolitan Area Roadway Plan", Austin Transportation Study, December, 1994. 5. "Congress For The New Urbanism", Transportation Task Force Initiative, June 2000 6. Residential Streets, ASCE, NAHB, ULI, 1990 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Page 23 Appendix Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company Appendix A: Intersection Analysis Sheets Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company AM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Street 5 & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 f77.11' Nerz-,aw.a2M; Vilagiaaran5tm,a1c4kAalita5MthiNAA Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Pifer :67.1111k-- Prt „ 4E574' A-0,141, 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 St,,,„57trAWR- AILWA:311M1 , 31. ,,5 -6' Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1583 1799 1583 1770 1856 ezossatparl,x2rAram.K100.M.474,2 1 eiii' ' § : # . ItedieleffficomeftwOrgaNSIS...„ - . e., Satd.Flow(rrm) 131F1543,,,,,,,,;t_712 71. _1583 ...0-V,,A'*, ,AV 4.6-,:tv-1 111 1856 „,,, g,..,...,,,,..,:,....„ „_ ....- ---". --_,--•„-: ---944-av -,-, -.....-. , , ,. - • 4.?,114 ;,,,,, Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Iii Ari 4.0 4.0 4-v4 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 e 0.- VJAMMOSIT gletrirgnial:AMPrilt ' , IX , .., , a,,,,if„,..,,,,,a.-71.,r,-,•.g.‘41:=1:1„,,kW44.0g4.-4,,AgaRlia arta,41„:,;:4,4„4.,.?_14,,,ov rg„ ,,,, ,vo,., e4- -t--,..e.- 0,-.,..--“,.., _ Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 59 0 42 13 158 436 taki,- .44 iNtliqq.VaVW4...X.INV ,1.7455-01,1*WRONti~iteaf*OT.iiiiiri" ,,,,,,...„a44.1-,,,i.AgamM Protected Phases 4 8 NMI ,....,,cm.pa,..,..T.now-,.1.w.ime.,1.4.„00,-.w,a41 „..,,a,„ --,,,,,-,,,.mf,,..„„--_,- -,.,q,„--;;;;-.,,,Av'f--_-.3;11-ki-*:01-_,...,..,''"' -.4.,,F . .•,,,,-.7W---0--0,„,:mmvgo rih.s.-, ,.„.s.„4.., T. ''', Actuated Green, Green, G (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 71.0 66.0 63.0 62.0 agr-- -T9ArgVjen'nlidfteVtr,Vj'ZalfktfA4t,mnloaz.,Ctr:xi'm-za,-,t,..:,zft,altf-- ,,,, ' 'fk,„w,434.,•4-1,- leffrg----A,,,A14,--g - Agf24:',117.,--.-- Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.81 0.74 0.72 0.70 '-'-'''','''"'-,5-v-:;:--- gyomwenVisirillEREgregNININNFelgraPnikwderr '31r-r-rlin ,45,4,4-:,1„ ' a,,,,„§3 0.-1^ - '-....430,..'''' .. SraSiM.000,4ARTANi4,`Atfigt'Z'N, tn al§:C ',f11-"aU,l'istri:14=S lalan=t4EZLISS OAR Ad., , ' %.,,Metta&A.....4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 .u.',.*,:ez.,:,,,-,;:ii5-:,,,th.n.M.,,,,,*,:.,s-u-,...,, Ati5Nycomvr,ngn3:.rjeRtgA,Z„atfn,ft'2Pvw----Avit 4.0 4.0 @AY.' 1.00 0.99 1770 1853 949 1853 0.92 0.92 4 0.92 0.92 4141 td.5 1407 0 hy" 3.0 14,111: vis Ratio Prot c0.05 0.23 0.00 c0.76 ea-riftwrimagen-MreArear. Yitt•ArPigniEnnatarSIMMAS,L3RW; v/c Ratio 0.73 0.37 0.33 0.08 0.79 0.32 0.01 1.08 , Alm,,,fiksmipir Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 sief.e.-t„ Delay (s) 58.3 39.3 39.2 37.0 61.1 4.4 dt„wAtttot-AART „ .16V4 Aft-- SAFIRgagyr" & Approach Delay (s) 51.1 38.7 19.5 ¶I' --41VA,MT, ANg 1.28 WC.FM -14„...da4k4Zit% 1.28 0.77 dL J---mmaS ft 4.5 56.3 56.1 '-'''SiNE'iairAffAtatil,4S1Mla-ft,tvZtti2';;:M;tZiS.f•Aei,:gc*i.A-T,z:TMtZitraai:42ftr "1""tpaptliowp' 411L5„aN6,1,,,,, ACT HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 .7-Tirvgatipriawasegi ,4k.rx.:,.:NeAmadtotagm-vo.k.g,a...„ Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.1% ICU Level of Service ----u-prwmfasmawomipmgrammow2RAIWPROWISORVIPO 1411,:e .02 10eVAPV rewat'-' lamoght. ,,,,ratainditdaistnalaViAdv, F 4ff" kte,-4„-t RECORDERS MEMORANDUM MI or parts of the tat on this page was not cljjfor satisfictory recordation. 4. AM 1/17/2001 AM ALL IANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 .oUIr3.-,4,4,-,,,--",,,ftee-'sA*---.4444.1r,,,04r,,:-,M,40,----.AR,M,:,,,,,,r4,...4,-.V....,,,,`,..-4,..,,,.."-k-...----......--....,..--.-a.„..4-,.... rr"ftlAIzair-aVAgkast,SFaii'.11tairlita$1144***V'SIMat*"t'&*144"1"t".'31"1"4"‘"' ...02atf5.,-..f".0,--VA-ZAIW2,41MatattietWOM$4-L'f,4 P-'e..."4-WAJW.,"•4441R4W4W.It444.004-%AtigrabiligNI-Ailiftngt,...,-n.,,4k,,A...I.I.,,,,I,,,,,,,,,;-,..4„,,A,.,, :kelfgafthe..An.AA44,%".ibegom, i.: .A.:,,,:,.„,A _,,,:;:m _.,:,g...:.... -..,,,„:„k„.,,,,,.a.,A,4„....„...„.„...,,,,,,,,....,..,,-.,,....z,,, „ - • ., • ., . _ . - .... ._ , . • . ,Sd"';"l1,lw,lz„:r'tW''l''l'wtt-lMll'tl'll'a,,lSV%g.Ill'';f.',AM".WkaiwWsVgmdtg&V",w,-..:-uza,„A Volume Left , me, ,,,,,„r„,!:,,,„,,,,,,,,,„,4,7,7„ ,41,1,,,,,,t --„e4.‘,..,,,,,,,,„..,,„,..,:. ,,,..„."-t.E.,__....g%,.t,.s.,..„.L4.5_,:ts:o,.v:,,,o------powrf.„vqod,,--,,,rk4e4,-4,,,,„„„.:„..,,,-.•„,„.,,„z-,,,,,,,„-,,,"‹„•••,--,--.- " ,,_,..,:,„„„.„,,,,,,..„,..„, .,,, ,......„-, .......„,- • •- ,,,,,,,,,m,-...,,---....-......,:!..,...,,,_ -,stm,,----m,-.v.-R-3,mgaqrk-e,xwagxwgiw4zmwgnfVzpmsn-nt-p,--*,, 4, cSH 177 1700 1700 HCIVI Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Street 4 & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 ZEGdflnf4t4L4iattdEV .0L:01134trittVa:Miatargihilnititgligiii Mta, Lane Configurations OMAN Grade 0% nI 0% 0% 1. • 4' 4:2F ARIMilkofit, tkar . 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians 14, Walking Speed (ft/s) Peak Hour Factor -164,104RPAPOPPIPLIWaTirx‘• ,....43-44r44.444.444,4444-4,40„..•01,440,,,„ Right turn flare (veh) „--iggiv-Irm."-44-.ArtemEtA r Median storage veh) vC1, stage 1 conf vol ,44„4-44 - • 4.1 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 0.92 0.92 0.92 ”o,43,4i.M444 .4-04 444 •OA:e • „414-1"4.4Q-, 414;CAMW,A,r0,2- faingratrgiblire14- 1111 n, gaifitaasL,,, 4.3.14.. I Mt—au -dislaNg;40 -waViAllW1 7.105M5ralp Cifitalafweaom-,470-Altte x.f,W ZIT; • 11WWWWPWRIMrStimes, Vg.iikididttaijeatiOSIs" ANWASINPIERENW-;---TW 04Pumlf4-„mwe,„%ei,z,4... .01744 WNMEM-Mr,", APV -400 ,o04L4Wt'-, 44: "4.414, 144 , 40-0,:„:„zalfitT aialE arif3A, 04%. tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 ese,"4730,1FOR-SPIALIWeiaPOP-iirff- cM capacity (veh/h) 75 177 487 womtfterozvrammowiroimplr.arAmliwrgagsvorr- ---gmmwmalimaarr - . gollgo2241ft.itz-P4aSSMZUMOOMEWPAORW„.40,01faigv:.:4A„..WIV-adgrMl.E.Atagtftgagralatal.oll,'IgmgmatOMATitt,";6:10;WMIRMIUMINA,,,,,,501‘.., vt,,,,zirrwtagozest. -44A •"/,'",":".am...wA,4047,9744.. "<'"wr44'44V4Mr""'" • )„, Queue Length (ft) 34 .'"t 400450101PgatkovIAAPPOOW r 44:,4444444 ,,441,41wrakIPPIN44(1, 4"it3 fill EMMA SOP 4411 Lane LOS Approach LOS LOS Zo.:4&„,„ M.n.r• p4,474,400.4.--r..we wo ,"41F11-'-'3*.at"Ona49100,- -ZOOlf.1%.11"011,05.444:440$:"4-4-. E•..""A"44‘1,44j.45,6 :..*..,-,soligaz44:42".44%,:kt,40:11140;-14aMitoiret-4MAARSiike%IfifegraiPMAILtatit'sr'-. 4,,444-,44,4m4,4A44,1444 , "1:1-.MAARA47; MAtAdargERMAAttlitiffar. 43.tein ,,,,,wagELRordigro: tsivom. WpArMriltti.„ teliAM1421n4g-kozolv-- Average Delay 14'44;4""%WirdiTIC ..-443-44444.44,4744-1=44no.444:34,4444 1.0 11171111411 Aitgaira, qCORDERS MEMORANDUM All or parts of the text on this page was not clearly legible for satisfactory recordation, 4 AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Lalma& A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 4 - Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 EgtittiftOgta iih1104Writr- Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 5/firM, 0.85 1.00 0.98 Fartrigo" 3, "w"- 70/CAVE .L.d."2.•" Satd. Flow (prot) Tallttbrr, „rm.. 1777 1583 1770 1583 1770 1834 1770 1862 rvifklemiLVIgkieeottl-m.rattor,uum: a.„„„A S• atd. Flow (perm) 1777 1583 1373 1583 127 1834 1770 1862 ,2W•135, , rig5S1 iW41626g,, • -mpr Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ,-.9/00; 114Mar,,,"4,1.3"WrAwamomwrig, voudarta0,4w ,alf*--"A;t1TiE Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 31 38 175 0 157 9 531 7:1W0 43 1229 11; 0 • • 'c& ikeaRkangiteL WqM514.1* a W..r.-70-•::4A-- alto Protected Phases 0.,---,,,--, , ,,,, ON *ArFARW.-- -WRIAmmleAkr-- IwilYWEVOIME$15512iNglieVaR. P:`,,,,,,X,,,,A=XIS-,,,,,. , ',..43.;,..' 1,4 ,41.; k.-...,11-4,04KlifellithiZavaihtlimo iititmfkiriljfigewv.,Ariagiggig&k, :11,610.Th- AF,LfWargarb".41M.1 4 .4 0 „.,,, -6, ,,,,,,,,,,A, •4. -„„:„ Actuated Green, G (s) 14._ I4:4 .,14111tria585711rfsg.e6llimsezac4459.6izitul Actuated gIC Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.67 0.65 0.04 0.67 -,,,.„,,,,,-,,,,, ---,,,,,,,,r, „,m-7„.z,-„:...Temsiko,,--zr-m-pmnr-Fr7,v5,,,,,e'.rwgz-Frltwor.cgly,ttorf*Kgr., , ,„„ „ - , , , - ,-,-• v., -/--i w,,-,r-,,g-*----7--z..,,,u-- Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 40,52,,,,taw„414,42:46vvoltor,41gvura,wit,-2:444,11044,27,1,,,mat -,q, prop,testsi.,,,4776, y,,,,92, 64,44,„qp;44 O274 235J4 • g-SC;4A:,rmarda-Rfg.-z:,;g*.-z,m,h-,5tk,,.44'Av'a vis Ratio Prot 0.00 0.29 c0.02 c0.66 '-'.'"':'-T-K-'itrd--rp'fijVzlrfW.'farttgfl"dS:4V'Oyriztgtfti,-glWftPVMalffPriif-PttVRYZittMrZ4'MzgmlfaTrrf"PtzBZ.i rf-Mi v/c Ratio 0.10 0.14 0.74 0.58 0.07 0.44 0.54 0.98 --IffiffhTWW!Rr-:iggfgINV-IFT:VrtfgltffiAWWPPHYReecgkl?PVMVKErIRYtttraPtgaiW,VtWfgfggtgg Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.85 1.26 0.66 w,mm,;r ,g-.4!-:-, ,,w 1--”lz.F,-. 7,r,-, 01,-T„,:,,,gimn ,at&-k,,,,,,,k't•VMMM-,51rOtt,A04.42itdkalhlea--"fttMEMAY--Aftatai,-:4ilaitg-Kgagit,4:„Atatk- i‘tlift11,-4..,ra-Itigiga". agt,....o.gmaii,- ,-.A,,,,rAiIr4SA Delay (s) 31.6 31.9 47.5 37.3 19.0 -9''''-r6-ttgijir'ar-f,W1gtat-ggedSfrfd:WPBFVNEWyS,SM,r*rVsopn.TSWZ$7.7 ,i.., 57.7 25.1 -,,,„„g.,.„.4.4:„,:,-,„,,....:fr„%,5-guzafa.kog,iyath:vggm,z,aigtio,I,„4„-ato'esk.gufs.*a-tteo.„,mt2reNt.mtm,,t. -r..rifrea- ,A%md.,*,,-?f4Q4.4gtx,e,zuz Approach Delay (s) 31.8 42.7 7.9 26.2 W suijiwairmmistioggiartmoRwmargirhysiewiroogwvaai , „40iriMaT'.',,M1,a ,L.... ,3 Ae414,1*.Mategg^frabi.41:41a74511WWWWelftliaga0AMkregAIAVhAVAtatiWata: t; 4-41113-0-:,,ft,-,ao aommi7u,:ife-gaza-kki arAkxttagagltw:Zitaf-MfigSfMiSCMZZ*Ta:, -warearst -"nespriem- 4karatangroddle -prooluvo, H• CM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 15000•WIRSIV :3-aizariMiNON • N -7,..40:5:4V2,41%.,402„*,.: ,"" -13•3timft•ttz-v, ---rA„-s.4„-„s-r,reg 0411111,1111111 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.7% ICU Level of Service -Tirmiwwwqvir,igriy„,--„,4mip,;44,Rveworriemsiromemig:Jaterfsretear- 11,WEINWS4tigg..- z•ttMOAO,M4W.,0 RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or parts of the text on this page was not clearly legible for satisfactory record ltion AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Street 2 & A.W.GRIMES 4/16/2001 aifi:ND:Sag,SAVXkda-attPqij:SWrdgtftj.qNkgtaan,Zjq.iaP:jrijRSejiEgknlalliSE.fittnatitt Lane Configurations Itrej41W41$1.10( Fife 4 Total Lost Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 Frt Trargir TAVaoeff.A.1.;:i41 AVZ:OLOkagrii 1- • ......4704Pra';', .,.a.aa 1.00 0.85 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 " ;ow ugh-W,WiM-4447,M#WWW---,-T 47frOWT Satd. Flow (prot) 1781 1583 1779 1583 1770 1845 1-111 z4.4mx.4107.4 Va.P44.. ""tftpa,--14tr"'. atIraLaat liget4A- ZIEIRK-4 aaagasa .4Rrasraitririfffatrireffrkiia.a.A.1....44,.. Satd. Flow (perm) 1086 1583 1265 1583 156 1845 664 1858 OTOWealliMpseR tgeselalwRE 0.92 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 j�II 1770 18 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 P.t.ffetlt- (414-86--. 82 96 0 124 107 33 600 00441:,-;-1. • 0 33 1085 0 4Varda • E10.10 0.92 ,a.4444 . , ,..'„ af,..,.:: A.-POKegabgErMia5W,M, - Avg . ..-a-41-. a4 . 4440 k .V.M.4.• ea.r. 4 a ;a111 iti= Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 a.y.gat.:.agOaqtr4traigfra*.gb..., -0144.t,gleimtrargal4a04-10Z Actuated Green, G (s) 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 61.8 58.8 61.8 58.8 '.;;.ciligm-iigewarpnvizaltaliVrly41,44.teigISIXT:44107.1t.e,' 4fatirgrgWir4S§WrOrFlit';'.,7; x„ _ Frt.-Am-14w, .: ',,: :',-, :.$.44,4<airtgz-Ar47M4.4.''' ; - I." 4,6z.44W51.if74:4•4(4.4Amaxa<4...V.I.cgat4-4.1.&...,•...a4ag.4 44,..akaa.malia.v.laa.-44.4,04.- 444.444.4ferrial Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.71 0.66 0.71 0.66 ONairair --77tarirektnifnliptggrargingilaintiMeiragk, Vir-PEgtillifiritatailitl$1015-24.31r,47,. WS. Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Win5A1,-.411--M11112.1-ifgailitliiMalfig* {82228 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.33 0.00 c0.58 . ,..-,,,--g....z-mm,a,r.t-ay...Ttp.wxfvrd-eu.s-tftgggAtqgN.fijz-pfduKvtyt'rPkbqotn.qFiiifgaxqr-r..wazr,qt:ptASIIEM v/c Ratio 0.48 0.38 0.62 0.43 0.18 0.49 0.06 0.88 fiaw,"'tsrlwoirtzlfgvxCisg-mxKwaPfal"pxxrtxwfotvore,§wAmrxvlmerrxsvvxiv:*74,14.-r=smaNtyfv'-aaw4afa •m-....,,,,.3,-7,,,,oz.am.,..,:t.c*.tt.14 --,..„ ox-oit-....,.,,,mwe--,..ma Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.48 1.16 1.00 1.00 4u 1' .P.t..... ,,... ,.....1, -A - Delay (s) 36.6 35.0 41.0 35.4 21.6 10.0 212 fti.7,....,_ NUAlatl.6'0.X.4a•&liKtit AiCat. ",.1-61,-.4.44,aa'agfti, - 4."-‘44.4- 7.Vabfraza" 20.7 1 6 Approach Delay (s) 35.7 38.4 •• • ; glaireirg 41. 10.6 Istamamatiwart.,MISLAYNLIS.14,4"ft.,w,-,..- aL AilatilMitilrERSIELSISISTSEISSZEMISISMOMASENE*42BillEMENAIMESO HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 .,,,,„,,,,,-,,,-.4WMT.e.x041442,101.4fifiga,....J,aKtzliP-Vs?=,--liWANIlii..egAmm-,,miailikttaalrerem,,-...., ,:e - -,-."-",-",APr.=• -4',W=TValinWEITINIA 5 :"--Org-lar3.18'Mffarieig. Cl=i4MilUaNlitil, 4i4r4 ter a Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.0% ICU Level of Service D W ITIEWeleingrOW‘twaAngeolf2AMPtliVEL,NERIBrafangiNfoRA-Arrsimmor-- ,ftg,m4grgA6,444,0~,,,PV0shadtgarAkillb" ',AW,4EMAIVI4i.UARiale.MWeradgranifeel.PAO 4444.2raWir"WwV.44 - - RECORDERS MEMORANDUM Ali or parts of the text on this page was not clearly legible for satiZaaory :ecc II AM 1/17/2001 AM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 PM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Street 5 & A.W. GRIMES d Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow (perm 4/16/2001 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1779 1583 1336 1583 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1800 1583 1770 1855 1426 1583 588 1855 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1770 1854 117 1854 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lane Group Flow (vph) Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) v/s Ratio Prot is Rati r wu v/c Ratio Progression Factor 7.4 7.4 0.09 0.09 3.0 3.0 7.4 7.4 71.5 66.4 0.09 0.'09 0.82 0.75 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Approach Delay (s) 0.39 0.24 34 x3 1.00 1.00 40.4 38.7 39.7 0.23 c0.01 c0.72 0.05 0.12 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 38.7 37.3 3.1 26.6 63.7 62.5 0.73 0.71 3.0 3.0 0.00 0.36 0.10 0.51 w 0.83 0.77 f f+ 18.3 6.0 f 6.2 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.2% ICU Level of Service RECORDERS MEMVMO1DUM All or parts of the text on this page was not :Andy legible for satisfactorj ecc .4.n. PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Street 4 & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 t diVAIMatilit0E2t4MAttliqaMiiittidfiflAattja-MarOttitklaSigstSaftia, Lane Configurations —rdt6firilpetlyst•WiEW Grade 0% ----1-4151-Nrire,„ Yr' 44, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 ..T44.41:-;4-1411k)ca :" • ;:e..vv Pedestrians wireavolk ;:g; Vtr Walking Speed (ft/s) --owcaigsverwrosistarom,,,, swim ." --mrefm.v-,Alervetagagimsitiw%ir Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) 4,-444,3,474 ,v5r, vC1, stage 1 conf vol • ' 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, single (s) tF (s) atsgat,11,,tog4-- -7g1274gftjtlaqitVitt' ,44Z4-igeoz..0wwv.-v-,„ cM -145'41.1 „ capacityve ( h/h) , 66 468 921 AfforAtirt matilgitr'Rer, AliMitalattitart. iNtrar.wmgpv.-44,,rigoagymitt.a.,...„ 0.92 0.92 W4, ,itte Nwsk.3.8fiar 0.92 siNgatial WAR" :,:a5,L4i,-V.4411471MMIa wroottearptOigkk'n,q:Nprafg,"-0.423.1„ Ippira:Wike4,14Fammr-trtap'..k "zkr'v-osgtmaPPPONLggkW,Mr..tie.r, 4-41,11,,:groimall-ragragesz gat 3.5 3.3 22 vv-acmam:::`,.74179:01}11Finr ly* Wig,IPT% -.40111115afraigr.git. LW' 4.040AnseTplirrM 23;A -a mgrAge, -We .415%arpOir gap '5140D-Ppialtrialeki owa,41.tirz---20.a slam 4.03,104,7 swim- 1140:44.-v.7,..30,AT 3 waft, .4AM-51.r Awimprifirria,W="s4VIVA',F2,42,56%.11Y, vs274,7, 1,41.R; '4v4444 -45 -0.V4 -44a4 4-0?.;:4,4`g-r4R4V451:4Wa,r4 -4.::40X.%744444W' ArralraRTANVITIVARMIWISE -1/4%410:,,,,irgataPAltaa'•WIteRMilag- tra4311123APM1V- i:ittPKE*VRPIVA%fnt"'SNBISSNIIIBMISMSIVi --,<MUMS10.MILgifiL—PallitatligialINHITIERMINVISS111111111triA,P; Volume Left0 0 0 .4§..,,,,,,,,,,,va.gammeEnztozamemsipsonsimitesataissinfigentleatatlittar °I1111111121111 cSH 468 1700 1700 Atairataw ,a11111111111111111111111,14 Queue Length (ft) Lane LOS PjYM47*31M Approach LOS MS; raklttaaw.Nrir'ISBFB-NallfILMSIIL*JtTtll 11 -14-?h-agraggmfitiWbmw,Mi-4,-. 4.053mtaitO. °,...gfgatiltaL - VotvaiWii r .4.rte - zow-4.---w-A-tiVrftot AiV,ig3NASW'4i2SFAPM-fiaelfl Average Delay 0.2 iEaVr:JPVIIVV:l'Nttatzitin,g*a4t:„VZ-o':-)va!V.VV._VJFV:'V'M. ,ZVVI,67.'6"9411:::tretirdritr 4.„ aECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or pans of the text on this page was not clearly legible for satisfactory Tan..41tion. PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Logan St & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 (:'ziaisaaff.adlitiqtAcTitatt4,7:t Lane Configurations 1r,ikmtvre-r; Total Lost time (s) Frt 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 Satd. Flow (prot) 1780 1583 111SWigail tAntiti, '2441- Satd. Flow (perm) 1363 1583 '''''''wte,NfWPA-1%VA4'tMEEV,:faztts After404114sa.tst..0.4,istsi ziAmuosswo....,;slad Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 *4; fto 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 44. 1770 1583 1770 1394 1583 641 18171770 1817 1.00 1.00 1858l' 117 1858 Lane Group Flow (vph)0 Iglewpwakr- 4 wAtka-ggra-,:- 14 20 0.92 0.92 0.92 '41044' • '.,r44ditaMb*'&‘44.' 0 115 99 41 0.92 0.92 1350 0 wrfif-yrirm 0.92 0.92 0.92 wattiwiffaztaw 4.4.1.217EWMAr-asge. 164 672 rawrix2w,roraw,,,, Protected Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.5 9.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 ' -.4*-gwasisvosvetvieres - 3.0 3.0 Vehicle Extension (s) wa--",,,b,-.''''"---tm*,---"-"g',,,watiAgisznimswagagew %%sr mkgsoNittrzt#,v, "itanzworop" -*.ssgm- N'Ass4mtriik,,m4fiNATAISMitSVA v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.74 7.1 9.5 9.5 63.5 SSJA 0.12 0.12 3.0 3.0 • 0.73 . se - 6 109.1fIrif-Wqr Issfas0j44 60.5 67.5 62.5 0.68 0.77 0.71 lait7M 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 gf,„ttirfO„.:V4Wgfnfla'atO c0.05 0.36 WIC -„rwl.grli:WPER:wo,:i!!!b , 3'4:-t-ira.5g-.i.woit?atpdtrAfeWrgtisv.,N v/c Ratio -71.grr 0,11,11rPOI 0.09 0.11 0.71 0.54 0.08 1.09 0.82 0.51 ----vA-'75mx"-snoltatifissmormstoodglkortiMEIRWSEPWARVIatre,"4416,41147411:4PRJETPar*E4WWWW Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.72 1.00 1.00 ffffffjftfiyitiptyiWd2tgpwoSRB,rt2nttfWMat'eitia:IWVldtwOWMV4VgMaVfra**,,aySrp'gfMt**,ggeSE w.4,..-.,4,i.,,,,M,:,,,,,,,,ZMW.14..,...,0,4V1UNERREM-g.,AAINEEt.Zuggez&IWASMOM,4,..kar..4.4,4041.4.,4L-gaZage:4,Attairagaltra:-.Z.:Ail'itNg-SAVirrig Delay (s) 35.7 35.8 51.3 40.4 4.7 57.3 65.1 7.5 74,..te,wegmemsnossmuswestfissmintymtPrit, ,;.:".77,87,,Pr-i,worni EssrawkW. :Nu.ssamossitr.#7:,,,,,awriroun ......,,A.,4,,A,-,s;-a.m,,,wzmossablortellsisfsan‘gissooviatimist--smaliss7t.....moNam;s414-vm --messfralPfigioftskskisiitasIll Approach Delay (s) 35.8 46.2 55.8 18.8 -747"'r wsw-P,MMUMFmr"zn*Mrewwir4w. ;"- ygyr..gfre,r4ofer,w1R-OrmOw.4.0747yig-W5migniiim.lir',1 fattimsytsc-A2/m:Loo;:to,;Bs;q-V2AVZSZZLF=EidfStzil&ftliti-PE .'141Prejg4i';'`gF44?' • 'ataggiagalg Z.ike 21A.6,01Fa-Aa. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio - 105.0% ICU Level of Service 1.07 Intersection 7E411:1111. Intersection Capacity Utilization m"Otg'Z"'Co,'V-4mg4R-TgaMKIMPTNVi.VMF.WO.Nere-ghe".itang$XASVXVM'IfnMVEM-.RZSMKa.tM-Pll.taP...X,fpf,gr.',.:, , :.0,16A-.Mr.4*7.-Xtabigt'Ua,,,Hatkagalkaagga.:.:-.4.gilaWAVAPA4144,:x.W.g,e0700.-AV.Ve.*44,=..4-AtI,Ott,kiaMNOV" WWW314241521 'RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or parts of the text on this page was not clearly legible for satisfactory recer+,tion. PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12:, Street 2 & A.W. GRIMES 4/16/2001 ZRZiekIAgSf'rrriL ';12i-71.'aaaEfltiVVelbiMtPft-iaezztVQ_€,.z.S-If',t4filf:A-VE' Lane Configurations r4,16001•1111t Total Lost time (s) -44 Frt 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1,FM'WrAa. IMUOSValY*102 VrAtiVitliM%*,A13,4 7Aaaa.. 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85 '11Atirt&E-FINTMTAWA Satd. Flow (prot) 1780 1583 1781 gso a,T,texAmplinzir.if " 'VI* ,t4'7.7,.,giorm•;:r- -- ,!mA.imagemittliiirtg. ,,,amommwegaima Satd. Flow (perm) 1296 1583 1327 7-ozwo-reaswmpromgwaremysangdmertliwwwlimenw na,4 ,t,,r ,.....mivydivanaggmeatiAstomr-4 at.25risatemerzolfsii tan'' ' 1,-- -,,,,,o.„tipat,,,,- A,-,,,,,,,,xgr Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1583 1770 1825 kL 1583 584 1825 4.0 4.0 • ,04,614-warlOW414e, 1.00 0.98 1770 1834 4,44900 - feitiagNiMp)., • 400W11044 164 1834 11111W2411!!4 l: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 111,..1141111111111L., AMILISMASIMIL: 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 63 0 85 107 118 1108 0 102 669 KONtiferirealgeRhi,4W a A '''' Irfriar" Onlilkaufri ' IiaatAA,A,.aAAMOAAU:It*EntiaikAnzaissAa4a'a aO:Uai ,,&a It -a ..„AmFaaaaaaa,a,w6a -,,, , ''''''' ''''gm'r '''''rrirairenitHAPPINIrairORARFMWSNAtr WRW,MatilM Protected Phases 4 8 manwspartrx Wat"r- ,„it.,,„--.,,,,,,, k;.,,-,,,,jaangmafitottuaiaSEWitimaitk.gf,4-14110,,,AfMtatavailga,:,b,,,, ,,,... IESItatiale ,MiLikaP444441Ager:041, Actuated Green, G (s) 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 66.1 61.1 64.1 60.1 .---x'--"'",,'..',...,,4,-5m,:Mnan2m-PrIVraREWONgarynyMplfreTreafpgrttypEggragNr =747 ;'''IMVFOIB .7k ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a,...,.,.A -,,,,,AA-amm,aigr- - ,„,ft'Sfkitizolltigm,Amsatttati,(,,,,,A0-81,w*:,;, .'A,...-: :-,:za-Ma..;,;44:gag4e,Aqul--,,MV • am: '.siv ji,,,,tgi-AraiA Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.75 0.68 0.73 0.67 draferragarillypitWESITMATCYSIMattMONSEVergrajMadiarAVAIROVVAMOP:449, 'r 'IMO trZira -,..,•,,..-.„,,...g,,,4,,,,,,,.,...?.,,..,,a-,,,:.:cAtimslageidefith.ddtkaladak„AzaiototoelgtoAioLmeift:4,..:zastai.age.4x.t.aigtodAidiot,e01agmlistV Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 aifiViSit*IiipietiatingtannangS2drigfaMatialeSiltfplotswowlemeasowliwisostsum -„, „;A,:,,,, 44;0- 4 ':,, :,go..04&40,45011V41.-0441444a1M4g4g104-w40afgat.04,:.441.e..'&40441v;.44 k416:40400M*04,444.4,14, 424.10,14 v/s Ratio Prot 1 411 0.02 c0.61 c0.03 0.36 m"-wrx,,:maln,WO Pirrit-lrPr/jElirdgPraayW-'''*':4aNirnrlla.tn9VAE ---=--AAmn.VSEIMI,Mararna,aatX «Sitalyij4gnIttrgMAVIVtvuUlv-413$4-5A.a.' y4, v/c Ratio 0.25 0.30 0.49 0.52 0.23 0.89 0.49 0.54 .,,,,p:joyP:d:reefitz.v.qfAvg4-sz-ozepo,qtz,..iwzdRzaw 4.„00„wx,n- 4.1m, 04-44..14-4i.44444-4-7/fb0efif.43,404,0= Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ----==-„rgf-.7,4;6;R.gpgtgrnmhrsit:,vetvwgimplmmvrlqi,FdrFpeNfr#,VF.;ifgi.VtPo.TEEgfcsliTE2SKSgt*WWvBi'S,VEM,MPF -.1,F2MMY,--*1-1.nOolls,1:4z4NOSVIVIAtl*e4Lft44.11.445i243s7I-.:EFAill,-.-7a1:1-47.424,,-,3;,012r_V474.1zYWY/A4a,..Avkagg,,ONliARztiq v-Aga-aaAs7ppqwAeUIAV7ZsaAVPrA'W-VTZAUW Delay (s) 36.4 36.6 38.9 39.0 4.7 21.5 17.2 9.5 ,,,A19„,,i1Warmatimisar., weirommiseekkawtcAlkowt,-...-morz, 10.5 Approach Delay (s) 36.5 39.0 19.8 -11144 *aro :174,4tagfg V4Wmgg;*VarrrqfertAVISYg-WOMRZWkq OZ--)Moswfitt , ;„„;::‘, '''ww!IfiliffilssP.141*Msw wozagirsladalia ;,-;:a.grAgrat s.4.,5S,V; HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 -.1rAWAVE.T400-Mili '-foyailverift-ty- ormatratroggroarmoi._-Arfa„4,10,F5,,,,,,,w4affsgew Intersection Capacity Utilization ,szsAgre,,,Srip',4.v4qr,'WM'VttratgZS;W*Vr4rPtaBTfaTMSr4s,,er2,,,,,I,RY.,,T,7,,.,;*J,f:";„,.., 86.5% ICU Level of Service 4.1111. AikMga omoyawil 14,1111511 lECORDERS 1V1EMORANDUM All or parts of the text on this page was not dearly legible for satisfactory :eccnn. PM 1/17/2001 PM ALLIANAUST-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Appendix B: Signal Warrant Analysis Sheets A traffic signal warrant study based on the projected peak hour volumes was performed. The primary objective of using the peak hour traffic was determining whether Warrants 11 and 12 would be met for the intersections along A.W. Grimes Boulevard. Three of the five intersections met Warrants 11 and 12. The following pages are the results of warrants 11 and 12 for the three intersections. Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company Intersection 2 Warrant Passed? 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume No 2 Interruption of continuous traffic No 3 Minimum pedestrian volume N/A 4School Crossings N/A 5Progressive Movement No 6Accident Experience N/A 7 Systems N/A 8 Combination of Warrants No 9Four Hour Volumes No 10 Peak Hour Delay N/A 11 Peak Hour Volume Yes 12 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Yes 800 N 700 E 0 600 CD V 500 Z 0 400 rD Q 300 L7 200 100 Figure 4-5: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Full Warrant Criteria • 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company Figure 4-2.6 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Two High Hours 150 300 U 0 € 1100 250 a a Q (750 c t 50 E 200 0 r 150 0 0) i 400 100 2 (75 11 800 1000 1200 Major Street - Total 1 1400 1600 1800 50 0 400 1 500 1 600 700 800 900 Major Street- Total of Both Directions 1000 1100 1200 Figure 4-2.4 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Eight High Hours 200 150 . € 1100 (750 c t 50 0 400 600 11 800 1000 1200 Major Street - Total 1 1400 1600 1800 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 A.W Grimes Blvd and Logan Dr Warrant Passed? 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume No 2 Interruption of continuous traffic No 3 Minimum pedestrian volume N/A 4 School Crossings N/A 5Progressive Movement No &Accident Experience N/A 7Systems N/A 8Combination of Warrants No 9 Four Hour Volumes No 10 Peak Hour Delay N/A 11 Peak Hour Volume Yes 12 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Yes 800 0) 700 E 0 600 — c 500 U 400 0 NS2 N Q 300 G7 200 2 100 Figure 4-5: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Full Warrant Criteria • 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Figure 4-2.6 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Two High Hours 150 300 s U 250 a, 15) 100 0 0.a a 200 c 0 = 150 400 600 800 1000 1200 Major Street - Total 1400 1600 1800 2000 m 100 F2 Cl) 8 50 0 400 I 500 1 600 1 1 700 800 900 Major Street- Total of Both Directions I 1000 I 1100 1200 Figure 4-2.4 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Eight High Hours 200 150 a, 15) 100 in 0 E 50 400 600 800 1000 1200 Major Street - Total 1400 1600 1800 2000 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 Intersection 5 Warrant Passed? 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume No 2 Interruption of continuous traffic No 3Minimum pedestrian volume N/A 4 -School Crossings N/A 5Progressive Movement No 6Accident Experience N/A 7Systems N/A 8Combination of Warrants No 9 Four Hour Volumes No 10 Peak Hour Delay N/A 11 Peak Hour Volume Yes 12Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Yes 800 700 E p 600 U 500 8 2 400 N R- E N Q 300 cn p 200 100 Figure 4-5: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Full Warrant Criteria • 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis June 15, 2001 Alliance -Texas Engineering Company Figure 4-2.6 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Two High Hours sl INI1 200 Minor Street- High Volume Approach - N N O O O O O O C -s 150 123 100 iiiLa 50 u 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Major Street- Total of Both Directions 1100 1200 Figure 4-2.4 Warrant Volumes for Traffic Actuated Signals Eight High Hours 200 -s 150 123 100 iiiLa 50 0 400 600 800 1000 1200 Major Street - Total 1400 1600 1800 Turtle Creek Village Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance -Texas Engineering Company June 15, 2001 RECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or pans of the text on this page was not clearly legibk for sa ctori ±' ¥m 5 / \ ® \ o a. ! / { }! e I| # q |{ \ \ _! - I. . ,i 5-: - , , ` - -S - ! ! .,�/a\ \ \ l¥/ !)) ! b/Ih I* Q$! )ik! ) -2 { §f ( } { aECORDERS MEMORANDUM All or parts of the text on this page was not <<�!e^ible for satisfactory; 0• oz U 0 EXHIBIT M LICENSE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this day of 2001, by and between the CITY OF ROUND ROCK, (hereinafter "Licensor"), a Texas home rule municipality, and the CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P., (hereinafter, "Licensee", whether one or more) . Whereas, Licensor is the owner of the public right-of-way located within the Turtle Creek Planned Unit Development as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein; and Whereas, Licensee desires to exercise certain rights and privileges upon public rights-of-way located within the Property; and Whereas, Licensor desires to grant Licensee certain rights and privileges upon public rights-of-way within the Property; and NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: License 1. Licensee shall have the right to install, construct, operate, maintain, upgrade, and repair landscaping, lighting and irrigation systems in, over and upon public rights-of-way located within the Property, as described in Exhibit "A". It is understood that this Agreement creates a license only and that Licensee does not and shall not claim at any time any interest or estate of any kind in the public rights-of-way located within the Property by virtue of this license. It is further understood that before the installation of any current or subsequent landscaping or irrigation systems, Licensee shall present a detailed landscaping plan, with associated irrigation, to the Director of Planning and the Director of Public Works for review and approval. It is further understood that Licensee must comply with all other requirements of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Round Rock, Texas. It is further understood that Licensor has no duty to maintain, operate, replace, upgrade, or repair any improvement in or upon the Property, including the payment of any fees of any kind associated with any improvements. 00006428. doC::ODNA\WORLDOX \O: \WDOX\CORR\GNL\ LICENSE \TIIRLTE\00006428.WPDtCdC Consideration 2. In consideration for this license, Licensee shall pay Licensor $10.00 and other valuable consideration paid by Licensee to Licensor. Nonassignable 3. This license granted in this Agreement is personal to Licensee or any property owners association created to maintain Licensee's Improvements. This Agreement is not assignable except to said property owners association. Any otherassignment of this Agreement will automatically terminate the license. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee shall be permitted to assign Licensee's license under this Agreement for any entity acquiring all or a portion of Licensee's property adjacent to the Property provided such assignee assumes Licensee's obligations and rights granted under this Agreement, and Licensee shall be released from any and all obligations hereunder accruing after such assignment. Terminable at Will 4. This Agreement is terminable by either party at will by the giving of actual notice to the other party. Upon termination, any improvements to Property will become the property of Licensor and it is agreed that Licensor will not need to reimburse Licensee for any costs expended for said improvements. Indemnity 5. Licensee shall comply with the requirements of all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and shall indemnify and hold harmless Licensor, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, causes of action, expenses of litigation, court costs, and attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any person, or for damage to any property, arising out of or in connection with Licensee's exercise of the license under this Agreement. Release 6. Licensee assumes full responsibility for its exercise of the license, and hereby releases, relinquishes and discharges Licensor, its officers, agents and employees, from all claims, demands, and causes of action of every kind and character, including the cost of defense thereof, for any injury to, including death, of person (whether they be third persons, contractor, or employees of either of the parties hereto) and any 0 0 0 0 6 42 8 . doc ::ODNA\WORLDOX\0: \WDOX\CORR\GNL\ LICENSE \TURLTE\00006428 - WPD ' cde loss of or damage to property (whether the same be that either of the parties hereto or of third parties) caused by or alleged to be caused, arising out of, or in connection with Licensee's exercise of the license under this Agreement whether or not said claims, demands and causes of action in whole or in part are covered by insurance. Venue 7. This Agreement shall be construed under and accord with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas. Notice 8. Notice shall be mailed to the addresses designated herein or as may be designated in writing by the parties from time to time and shall be deemed received when sent postage prepaid U.S. mail to the following addresses: CITY: City of Round Rock ATTN: City Manager 221 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 COMPANY: Attn: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this AGREEMENT is executed on this day of , 2001. CITY OF ROUND ROCK By: ROBERT A. STLUKA, JR., Mayor CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P. 3. By: STATE OF TEXAS Title: Printed Name: COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON) BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, on this day personally appeared ROBERT A. STLUKA, JR., as Mayor of the City of Round Rock, a Texas Home Rule Municipality, on behalf of said municipality, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the day of , 2001. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Texas STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, on this day personally appeared as for CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the day of , 2001. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Texas 4. After Recording, Please Return To: Brown, McCarroll Sheets & Crossfield, L.L.P. 309 East Main Round Rock, Texas 78664 OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS • co -14-2002 10:27 AM 2002003703 ANDERSON $245.00 Cr r. RTSTER ,COUNTY CLERK WILL T AMROUN N ku1 LAAb 5. 1 -01 -07 -1Z -106Z MAUJiJwvrUto CITY OF ROUND HOOK ADMINISTRATION 221 EAST MAIN STREET ROUND ROCK, TEXAS 78664 LICENSE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this 1 J . day of LIi-- / , 2001, by and between the CITY OF ROUND ROCK, (hereinafter "Licensor"), a Texas home rule municipality, and the CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P., (hereinafter, "Licensee", whether one or more). Whereas, Licensor is the owner of the public right-of-way located within the Turtle Creek Planned Unit Development as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein; and Whereas, Licensee desires to exercise certain rights and privileges upon public rights-of-way located within the Property; and Whereas, Licensor desires to grant Licensee certain rights and privileges upon public rights-of-way within the Property; and NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: License 1. Licensee shall have the right to install, construct, operate, maintain, upgrade, and repair landscaping, lighting and irrigation systems in, over and upon public rights-of-way located within the Property, as described in Exhibit "A". It is understood that this Agreement creates a license only and that Licensee does not and shall not claim at any time any interest or estate of any kind in the public rights-of-way located within the Property by virtue of this license. It is further understood that before the installation of any current or subsequent landscaping or irrigation systems, Licensee shall present a detailed landscaping plan, with associated irrigation, to the Director of Planning and the Director of Public Works for review and approval. It is further understood that Licensee must comply with all other requirements of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Round Rock, Texas. It is further understood that Licensor has no duty to maintain, operate, replace, upgrade, or repair any improvement in or upon the Property, including the payment of any fees of any kind associated with any improvements. Consideration 2. In consideration for this license, Licensee shall pay Licensor $10.00 and other valuable consideration paid by Licensee to Licensor. Nonassignable 3. This license granted in this Agreement is personal to Licensee or any property owners association created to maintain Licensee's Improvements. This Agreement is not assignable except to said property owners association. Any other assignment of this Agreement will automatically terminate the license. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee shall be permitted to assign Licensee's license under this Agreement for any entity acquiring all or a portion of Licensee's property adjacent to the Property provided such assignee assumes Licensee's obligations and rights granted under this Agreement, and @::ODMA/WORLDOX/O:/wdox/CORK/gnl/license/turlte/00006428.WPD/cdc Licensee shall be released from any and all obligations hereunder accruing after such assignment. Terminable at Will 4. This Agreement is terminable by either party at will by the giving of actual notice to the other party. Upon termination, any improvements to Property will become the property of Licensor and it is agreed that Licensor will not need to reimburse Licensee for any costs expended for said improvements. Indemnity 5. Licensee shall comply with the requirements of all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and shall indemnify and hold harmless Licensor, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, causes of action, expenses of litigation, court costs, and attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any person, or for damage to any property, arising out of or in connection with Licensee's exercise of the license under this Agreement. Release 6. Licensee assumes full responsibility for its exercise of the license, and hereby releases, relinquishes and discharges Licensor, its officers, agents and employees, from all claims, demands, and causes of action of every kind and character, including the cost of defense thereof, for any injury to, including death, of person (whether they be third persons, contractor, or employees of either of the parties hereto) and any loss of or damage to property (whether the same be that either of the parties hereto or of third parties) caused by or alleged to be caused, arising out of, or in connection with Licensee's exercise of the license under this Agreement whether or not said claims, demands and causes of action in whole or in part are covered by insurance. Venue 7. This Agreement shall be construed under and accord with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas. Notice 8. Notice shall be mailed to the addresses designated herein or as may be designated in writing by the parties from time to time and shall be deemed received when sent postage prepaid U.S. mail to the following addresses: 2. CITY: City of Round Rock ATTN: City Manager 221 East Main Street Round Rock, Texas 78664 COMPANY: Attn: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this AGREEMENT is executed on this day of Jub, , 20 . STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON CITY OF ROUND ROCK CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P. BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, on this day personally appeared ROBERT A. STLUKA, JR., as Mayor of the City of Round Rock, a Texas Home Rule Municipality, on behalf of said municipality, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the of Ju LA/ , 20 . CHRISTINE R. MARTINEZ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES August 5, 2001 3. 1 oC.J day NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Texas STATE OF TEXAS } COUNTY OF 1 I (L) *I O/l) } BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, on this day personally appeared Iriswej :i/(.&4,4; ill I 'r(; t} GU- of CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TERAS, L.P. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. o9IS Given under my hand and seal of office on this the day of aka E , 2003 PIALaill)/ed VYla NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the 4 State of Texas CHRISTINE R. MARTINEZ '= MY COMMISSION EXPIRES August 28, 2006 After Recording, Please Return To: Sheets & Crossfield, P.C. 309 East Main Round Rock, Texas 78664 4. ADMINSTRATIVE AMENDMENT TO PUD # 47 ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY. March 1, 2005 Mayor Nyle Maxwell Mayor Pro -tem Alan McGraw Council Members Tom Nielson Carrie Pitt Scot Knight Scott Rhode Gary Coe City Manager James R. Nuse, P.E. City Attorney Stephan L. Sheets Al111111 Mr. Richard Maier Continental Homes of Texas, L.P. 12554 Riata Vista Circle, Second Floor Austin, Texas 78727 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AME" 5 PG5 RE: Administrative Amendment to PUD 47, land use Dear Mr. Maier: 2005020648 Further to your request for an administrative modification of the land use designations in PUD 47 (Turtle Creek), I have made the following administrative amendments as provided for by Section 1.1 of "III. Miscellaneous Provisions". 1. Paragraph 6.4 of Section II. is deleted in its entirety. 2. Exhibit "K", Land Use Plan, is replaced in its entirety with the exhibit attached hereto. The above amendments are intended to provide greater flexibility in the location of the elementary school and potential day care facility. Sincerely, m Stendebach, AICP Director of Planning Tom Word, P.E. Chief of Public Works Operations Charles Crossfiel City Attorney CITY OF ROUND ROCK Planning and Community Development Department 301 West Bagdad • Round Rock, Texas 78664 Phone: 512.218.5428 • Fax: 512.218.3286 • www.ci.round-rock.tx.us THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Jim Stendebach, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as the Director of Planning of the City of Round Rock, Texas, a municipal corporation, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated. �� '',YP'''9FcS'/-''i ,. .O�p&E Ugh• 'N ' • s Q5 >,- co ti IGEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the Ki day of IAA- v, 2005. THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON u t' )&k . NOiary Public Signature State of Texas BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Tom Word, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as the Chief of Public Works Operations of the City of Round Rock, Texas, a municipal corporation, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the at( 2005. THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § day of Notary Public Signature State of Texas BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Charles Crossfield, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as City Attorney of the City of Round Rock, Texas, a municipal corporation, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated. AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the day of GIVEN. UNDER MY HAND , 2005. iotary✓Public Signature State of Texas AGREED TO BY OWNER: Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership By: CHTEX of Texas, Inc., a Delaware corporation, ;ts sole General Partner By: Name: ' ; chard N. Maier Title: Vice President THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TRAVIS § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Richard N. Maier, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as Vice President of CHTEX of Texas, a Delaware corporation general partner of Continental Homes of Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SE !i SF OFFICE, this the 1(e day of jAake,ti ,2005. Notary Public Signature State of —Te--'sA5 ) @ Ip® 2 ! 0 l' )\ $ k /\ ; ) ) ( ® . / 7 / ( ! ! X14 ! ! & i { { / f 2 a ] h §// §]{ k ! \ f . ) ® / / ® RECORDERS MEMORAND All or parts of the text A this page,: clarly f satisfactory rmr ! Please return to: Kathy Miller City of Round Rock 301 W. Bagdad # 210 Round Rock, TX 78664 FILED AND RECORDED OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS 2005020648 03/23/2005 08:20 AM CARRILLO $22.00 NANCY E. RISTER, COUNTY CLERK WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS