Loading...
G-04-03-25-13E1 - 3/25/2004ORDINANCE NO. V°'' AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A "COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN, MARCH 2004," WHICH CONSTITUTES THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK'S TRANSPORTATION POLICY; AND REPEALING ALL CONFLICTING ORDINANCES OR RESOLUTIONS. WHEREAS, the "Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan, March 2004" constituting the City of Round Rock's updated transportation policy has been presented for consideration to the City Council; and WHEREAS, said "Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan, March 2004" replaces the "Transportation Master Plan" adopted by the City of Round Rock under Ordinance No. G -99-01-14-13B3 dated January 14, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held public hearings concerning the "Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan, March 2004" on September 17, 2003, January 14, 2004 and February 18, 2004; and WHEREAS, after considering the public testimony received at such hearings, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the "Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan, March 2004" be adopted; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the "Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan, March 2004" be adopted, Now Therefore /DINr_A"C/0407,11F] .WPD,v r BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS, THAT: I. Exhibit A is hereby adopted as the "Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan, March 2004" of the City of Round Rock, Texas. II. A. All ordinances, parts of ordinances, or resolutions in conflict herewith are expressly repealed. B. The invalidity of any section or provision of this ordinance shall not invalidate other sections or provisions thereof. C. The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of the meeting at which this Ordinance was adopted was posted and that such meeting was open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Ordinance and the subject matter hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. READ, PASSED and ADOPTED on first reading this the day of , 2004. Alternative 2. j) th READ and APPROVED on first reading this the / I day of ` O LC , 2004. 2 READ, APPROVED and ADOPTED on second reading this the day of OACI2004. W L, Mayor City of Round Rock, Texas CHRISTINE R. MARTINEZ, City Secret 3 o rehensive Transportation Master Plan ROUND ROCK, TEXAS PURPOSE. PASSION. PROSPERITY. city of Round Rock March 2004 EXHIBIT "A" Introduction The City of Round Rock has experienced rapid growth in both population and employment over the past two decades. This growth resulted in increased traffic congestion on the City's roadway system. In order to maintain adequate mobility for the citizens of Round Rock, the Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan was initiated and subsequently amended by the City to support the transportation goals and objectives of the General Plan. The Transportation Master Plan encompasses the transportation system within the City limits as well as the Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The goals and objectives of the Transportation Master Plan are: Goals: • Ensure that the citizens of Round Rock are afforded an adequate future transportation system. • Ensure the efficient utilization of the dedicated 1/2 cent sales tax. • Identify the major deficiencies in the existing transportation network. Objectives: • Evaluate the existing transportation network. • Identify current and future land uses and travel patterns, as well as, population and employment forecasts. • Identify environmentally -sensitive areas. • Develop roadway design standards. • Incorporate citizen participation into the planning process. • Identify the necessary transportation network improvements. • Develop a short term (2010), a long term (2020) and an ultimate transportation network to serve the community needs. Planning for Ultimate Growth The City of Round Rock is the 9th fastest growing city in the U.S. and the fastest growing city in the nation with a population over 25,000. To maintain the quality of life enjoyed by the Citizens' of Round Rock, extensive future planning for the City's transportation infrastructure is essential. An adequate transportation network is considered by many as the backbone to organized growth in any community. The total development of land within the present city limit, as well as, the Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) at a certain time in the future is a reasonable conclusion from studying the development of communities that are similar to Round Rock. By planning for the ultimate growth of the city, the Transportation Master Plan establishes the ultimate roadway network and protects adequate rights-of-way to meet future transportation needs. The plan also provides property owners with a tool to minimize conflicts during development. Land Use and Demographic Information The City's adopted existing and future land use plan was used as the basis for forecasting future demographic information needed for the Transportation Master Plan. Adjustments were made to the city's land use plan in response to newly approved or anticipated development projects. Based on future land use, population and employment forecasts were made for the ultimate growth scenario, as well as, the years 2007 and 2017. The forecasted totals were then disagregated to Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). These zones were used in the travel demand modeling process. Traffic Demand Modeling Using the population and employment data, computer models were used to forecast future travel on a transportation network between the various TAZs in the study area. The model generated traffic volumes for existing, as well as, forecasted trips. By studying the traffic volumes and the capacity of the roadways, the level of congestion was determined. A volume to capacity (V/C) ratio greater than one (1) normally reflected a need for roadway improvement. The modeling process was used as a tool to determine needed major transportation improvements. However, some recommended improvements were based on professional judgment. Environmental Issues During development of the Transportation Master Plan, consideration was given to Neighborhood and Community Resources, Water Quality, Air Quality, Historical Meteorology, Hazardous Materials, Threatened and Endangered Species, Natural Areas and Ecosystems, Parklands, Wetlands, Floodplains, and Historic and Cultural Resources. Identifying environmentally -sensitive areas early during the planning process reduces the risk of cost overruns, schedule delays and design complexity. Public Involvement The development of the Transportation Master Plan utilized several approaches to receive citizen input. The public was provided with an e-mail address to submit comments relating to the plan developments and recommendations. Public input was also solicited through three (3) public meetings, which were held at the City Council Chamber, and several neighborhood meetings. Financial Analysis In 1997, the Citizens of Round Rock authorized the adoption of a 1/2 cent sales and use tax dedicated to roadway improvements. In 2001, the City of Round Rock voters approved General Obligation Bonds including authorization of $37.1 million for streets, sidewalks, landscaping and traffic signal projects. The transportation project list was developed based on the City leveraging available funds to obtain additional funding from State, County and private sources, the City directly funding transportation system improvements and a future bond to be approved prior to 2020. Transportation Plan To meet the transportation demands of population, employment and economic growth, the City developed the Transportation Master Plan, which consists of two basic elements, a roadway element and a bicycle/pedestrian element. The feasibility of a transit element was considered by researching the transit operations at several comparable size Texas cities. The operations were limited to either a single fixed bus route or demand/response type of transit activities. Either type of operation will not contribute significantly to the relief of the anticipated future traffic congestion. Future updates of the transportation plan will consider all transportation modes including roadway expansion, high -occupancy vehicles (HOV), which include regional/commuter rail, Tight rail, bus transit, limited shuttle service and van/car pools, and bicycle/pedestrian facilities. The transportation plan is presented as an Ultimate Roadway Network and a Roadway Table. The network shows existing and planned arterials, which includes bicycle facilities, for the ultimate growth of the City. The table shows the current section of all City arterials and roadway improvements planned for 2010, 2020 and the ultimate growth scenario. The table also shows the estimated cost, length and ultimate right-of-way width. METHODOLOGY FOR PREPARATION OF THE LAND USE DATA BASE FOR THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN City of Round Rock, Texas prepared by Dunkin, Sefko Et Associates, Inc. August 27, 1998 PURPOSE The purpose of this technical report is to describe the process and methodology used, as well as the results achieved, during preparation of the Transportation Plan Data Base for the City of Round Rock and its extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). The land area involved in this planning process included that area within the City's corporate limits and within the City's ETJ (the "planning area"). METHODOLOGY Early in the planning process, it was determined that the informational needs of the City pertaining to short- and long-range transportation planning would necessitate the development of locally originated land use projections for the City and its ultimate planning area. The land use projections were prepared in a format that makes them suitable for use in computerized transportation planning and analysis which is achieved through transportation modeling. The transportation model used for the Round Rock study requires socioeconomic demographic data in the form of population and employment estimates. Estimated population and employment projections were prepared for 1997, 2007, 2017, and for an ultimate, or "build -out", scenario for the City and its ETJ. Based upon existing 1997 land use data that was available on the City's geographic information system (GIS), estimates were prepared for each of the planning area's (City and its ETJ) traffic analysis zones (TAZs). TAZs are geographic areas usually bounded by existing or future major roadways, railroads or other physical features. TAZs exist for all of the Austin metropolitan area, including Round Rock, and are shown on maps that are available at the City and are also included on exhibits within Appendix "A" of this report. The population and employment estimates (as well as the projections) were prepared for the following categories: • Population -- number of persons (i.e., residents) • Households -- number of occupied dwelling units • Basic employment -- industrial and heavy commercial uses ■ Retail employment -- retail uses SS-C:\WPDOCS\ROUN-THO.RPT (08/27/98) Page 1 of 3 ■ Service employment -- office, government and other service -related uses Population was calculated using the number of occupied dwellings (single-family and multi- family). Employment was estimated using several factors, or multipliers. If employment data was available and verifiable from other sources, such as the Austin Transportation Study (ATS), actual employment records from companies or the Texas Workforce Commission, then that data was used. If actual employment figures were not available from these sources, then multipliers were used to estimate the number of employees per square footage of building area. The following multipliers were used to estimate current employment and to make projections on future employment: • Basic -- 20 employees per acre • Retail -- 17 employees per acre • Service -- 35 employees per acre These multipliers were adjusted for each TAZ, depending upon factors such as access, terrain, developable area, or other factors which would impact the type or amount of development within each TAZ. Ultimate, or "build -out", estimates were calculated using the City's latest adopted Master Plan. Future land uses were based upon the Future Land Use Plan map within the Master Plan report, and were converted into population or employment (basic, retail or service) data. Adjustments were made in response to newly approved or anticipated development projects that were made known to the consultants. If no known development plans were available for a particular area, then employment multipliers were used to determine the future potential employment for that area. Population estimates and projections were generated using an average density of four (4) dwelling units per acre for future low density residential areas. Population estimates and projections for multi -family residential areas were calculated using an average density of twenty (20) dwelling units per acre. The formulas used in calculating population and employment estimates are shown below: • Population estimate = developable acres x number of dwelling units per acre x 2.9 persons per household • Employment estimate = developable acres (basic, retail and/or service) x number of employees per acre Ultimate build -out estimates for Round Rock are based upon the assumption that the planning area is developed at 95% capacity. Projections for 2007 and 2017 were developed using reasonable growth rates for Round Rock, from which control totals were established. Woods and Poole Economics, Inc. (a national economic forecasting firm) has projected average annual growth rates for Williamson County through the year 2020 of approximately 3.2% for residential (i.e., population) and 2.5% for SS-C:\WPD005\ROUN-THO.RPT (08/27/98) Page 2 of 3 employment. These growth rates were used as a comparison for establishing the growth rates for Round Rock. The following average compounded growth rates were determined to be reasonable for planning purposes in Round Rock: 1997-2007 2007-2017 ■ Population 2.7% 2.0% ■ Employment 2.6% 2.0% Based upon the above assumptions, the following estimates and projections were used in the Transportation Plan data base: Ultimate 1997 2007 2017 Build -Out ■ Population 71,782 93,500 114,300 236,000 • Employment 29,017 37,600 45,800 129,700 Appendix "A" shows the growth allocation for each TAZ, as well as exhibits that graphically show the above estimates and projections. Growth was allocated to each TAZ for 2007 and 2017 based upon assumptions of anticipated development. A development percentage was applied to each TAZ, and the population and employment projections were calculated based upon that percentage. For example, if a particular TAZ was anticipated to be predominantly built out in 2017, then the assumed multiplier would have been 100%. Similarly, if a particular TAZ was assumed to be halfway built out in 2017, then the assumed multiplier would have been 50%. SS-C,\WPDOCS\ROUN-TNO.RPT (08/27/98) Page 3 of 3 APPENDIX "A" SS-C:\WPDOCS\ROUN.THO.RPT (08/27/98) APPENDIX "A" City of Round Rock, Texas 'cV-""'""°--N"N "°,9iNNNc".i c"v NRc,�RA9RnRg?,;q4<e^eee9,R9, N N e N D O o O O !� OO p 88 OO 8$ A rn g n g � I� t� I h 0� 8 0 8 P� 0 e h 8 O (� a��� r � N t� � N� 0^ N Nm O e O O O N p m � mn mRBH N eO�� �n b (j>�i aD 0 a ,VIA Noilm� airiWi pNg$o"Ni�om rog'$NNQgo?mmoN000g^14,1 N N r8<� SR8"N8NgO0 rn�mN�' qg88R�m$RRS"S,e'4o'�§W§11:1"giig � "�n Nwo-e Ri g� N .- N o "Rg§2 §'^$8gSgC$m8$P8oR0o2 8Rme i^W$ W°F00I'VM! ?538SSoe??,52S 2Wg885ipRF„ 2 2'4"HiU7RRR'gm^'2'8o80$28g a gg JRoRB$o0g8��m�N$NO$Nwoo.W"2oo§8M428§F "§11:1"'N ,11 � 9,, $$ � a N 0 r188��MEMIIPMF§ 118M110§?§080o08N /ge N N 8 gFA" ?°2A�0NA§?871§R'VIE2o10o0L4ril o �<mNm�ro`MIEF mP.i8�R� 2 ^8285iRRw Mi 82§s§828,mrmRgeg§'90" §§18§1' '8" Mi 88$"88il§RN' BSS:oS^o'1°°28Hgr'gl2WW°§0�o�R°"Lki S N 2 s �,N N R°2R4Rtq"RsPJ�sR<R 8i§R8RSRSoo§WMRRm§§R'm'80Ro82 Ro^,no0oa77q.Fig``F. •oON00�R$'$eu�"§7,3 S"- §7N8rogo"';E§§ y 77SS a § '88§8'$8Egc 2§ M I/ seg s§§8§P-sa188°"2'2 Oo§N o§f§ 2. ' m 0 a R2°P',Ron 7Mi nWa8m'w3'Qa.�-1§884WIPV—V'N000NRV§c4, gN ssx84R8888ei§s§§e218§8SSS.288pR§g§m§§M^'§'a'RN� M§ w g R-= 'mm"gcontM§B$§,omW-9t,IEN �SR^m1'g$nmmoR og10g0ooNom$ 88 -- m a� m R'ARg'48°RR�I�y",Vg$SRiHgg82,S3R8"OrMNp:2mg&"8'$'R°,1;% R0R2O0oia "E.,tivo m8"oRSo$RG"0g,-nm m,R0;s010§ ooNNmgg N N Q m 'e0'RIirg11`$N'5�88�$Nim m"N%83Eii4p pe'e5r—Rve�oo'2WfP 8^ 0 a RRnmOei.nM''e,cnMnei,"'"H8N^qn1ra;FIV-61Kio"ar-2?--NOoo 8E-22 8 ~" t H "$o q:112a3,00N ^=mmOEF,"8§5FRgm`n? -§F3:= o_'0'FN,OpoN"2�nm4 m WR..^mo2VR`URKR18$o'oO2. 4F8FaEp{:",aoE1'°Vr'oNOm`2' _ n_ 0n0a NgE�mDo�y+Omm'FiNMoo$ 8m°E,2,2ip72'nm°"6°,800orn00N N M Ro'e0000R ng'mBe.F.�`"?m'�nn"m�RooSci �n1O�'mro�Nemno.-.�o,�oc�ooN�mo.. a m 8 RR VE4 `8dN,nRN?FHN.".i^N&'Rr;`o"`, xr,R,%vagiv 'e a'&^awaR^6 W Cn 1- Q vz 1-0. CL Z o 4 a CCI- c� Fri od CC CL © Z Ri N AcoQ Cc o 0 F- CL 1` 0. W N 1- cmZ Ca 8o cc t-- v ac ©o© ce a • ©z5© Q a .,.� CC 0 co t- a an W m H �Z H• J CL vZ cc C aN prh C Q *... V) o z . Q CI. v. CC 0 1- C3 L1T 0. O a W cn a co , H a U Z €i ©© o CC CL O E CC a 4 Z 0000 a o 0 N N') N 0 r i N p C r woo Lf) 0 N r N C7 d �Z H J €L Z ©©r °ca c' =c= Z cc E C?F-WN' 0 .174 C2. 0 a © 0 0 10 © 1 1 r- 0 0 © 1.0 1 W (n m F- a co � J CL z ©Qcc t` a N z cr c cc �+ ©zQ© co cc E UF—Wt) © 0 0 00 r- 0 r cv0 0. 0 0. 1001-1800 1801 -5411 C 0 0. 0 0 0 r r- 0 00 0 © CO 0 0 r C3) t[) r I g 1 1 r r o - a CO 1 cn c co • ct E ▪ Z O E cc i— w ▪ c'E c • cc o 0 CC CL •-• co 0 O ZN. cX CC 0 N f— i- 0 z a. 0 in 0 00 00 0 IP •r- 0 El C• T 00 ax) co , 1 00 0 OD 11 METHODOLOGY FOR PREPARATION OF THE TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN City of Round Rock, Texas Prepared By Rust Lichliter / Jameson 1998 This report summarizes the development and calibration of the travel demand model utilized to represent existing and future year traffic volumes for the Round Rock Transportation Plan. This methodology follows generally accepted transportation planning practices and Transportation Research Board Report NCHRP 225. To aid the long range planning required by the Round Rock Transportation Master Plan, a series of computerized planning models were developed to perform traffic forecasting for different scenarios. Travel demand modeling can be divided into three steps: trip generation, trip distribution and traffic assignment. Trip generation estimates the number of trip ends produced in and attracted to each traffic analysis zone based on the land uses in each zone. Trip distribution is accomplished by a mathematical gravity model that distributes the generated trips to all possible zones. The gravity model mathematically relates the trip interchange between zones to the number of origins and destinations in each zone, and inversely relates the number of trips to the travel time between zones. The traffic assignment step assigns vehicle trips to the roadway network based on selecting the route with the lowest travel time. Trip distribution and traffic assignment was accomplished using TRANPLAN, an integrated set of computer programs used to forecast travel demand on roadway networks. Traffic Analysis Zones The Round Rock study area, which encompasses the City of Round Rock and its Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), was divided into traffic analysis zones that match those described in the Austin Transportation Study. These zones were used to relate population and employment with travel demand and to develop travel patterns within the study area. The model included a total of 53 internal traffic zones with an additional 21 extemal zones. The external zones serve to connect the Round Rock roadway network to major facilities crossing the ETJ. Trips generated from external zones represent those trips that either begin or end outside the Round Rock study area, or that pass completely through the study area. Existing Population and Employment Existing (1997) population and employment were estimated for the entire study area by individual traffic zone. This data is available separately in a report by Dunkin Sefko & Associates, Inc., "Methodology for Preparation of the Land Use Database for the Transportation Plan." These 1997 population and employment estimates were used as input for the travel demand model to estimate the number of vehicle trips produced by or attracted to each traffic analysis zone. Existing Roadway Network The roadway network is used in two steps of the modeling process. It is used to determine the total zone to zone travel times for trip distribution and it is used to assign traffic to the Round Rock roadways. The roadway network developed for this study was derived from the Austin Transportation Study and supplemented to include new roadways. Generally the network consisted of IH 35, US 79, farm to market highways, county roads, major and minor city arterials and selected city collector facilities. Committed improvements to the existing roadway network (improvements for which funding has been identified), as identified by TxDOT and the City of Round Rock, were included in all models except the original existing conditions roadway network. Traffic Model Development The existing Round Rock population and employment data were used as input to develop trip generation for each analysis zone. The trip generation was used to estimate the number of trips that begin or end in a traffic analysis zone. Once the number of trips produced from each zone was estimated, a distribution model was utilized to distribute them among attractions in the other zones. This produced a trip table that is a matrix of origins and destinations. These trips were then assigned by the model to the roadway network to develop traffic volumes. Model Calibration The intended use of travel demand modeling is to create a computerized model that faithfully represents existing conditions so that future scenarios can be studied. To accomplish the task of creating an accurate representation of existing conditions, the model is calibrated. After the 1997 vehicle trip table was assigned to the existing roadway network, 52 locations were identified where modeled traffic volumes could be compared to actual traffic counts. The initial assignment did not completely replicate the existing traffic counts. Therefore, the trip generation rates were adjusted until the modeled traffic counts represented the existing traffic counts. The deviation between modeled traffic volumes and the actual traffic counts is shown in the graph on the following page. The maximum desirable deviation is shown as the curved line on the graph. While a few points fall above the line, overall the modeled traffic volumes represent actual counts within 3 percent (574,066 versus 596,774). Percent Deviation 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% - 20% - 10% - 0% Modeled Deviation from Existing Traffic Counts 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 Existing (1997) Traffic Counts 50,000 60,000 Summary and Conclusion The comparison of modeled trips with observed traffic counts throughout the study area confirms that the traffic model closely represents 1997 conditions, and it was concluded that the Round Rock traffic model can be used to forecast future travel patterns reliably. The next steps in this process are to identify the future demand on the existing plus committed roadway network and test altemative solutions to the predicted traffic congestion. Amendment to Environmental Issues During development of the Transportation Master Plan, which was adopted in 1999, Neighborhood and Community Resources, Water Quality, Air Quality, Historical Meteorology, Hazardous Materials, Threatened and Endangered Species, Natural Areas and Ecosystems, Parklands, Wetlands, Floodplains, and Historic and Cultural Resources were considered sensitive areas. These areas are still considered sensitive and the findings of the investigation continue to be valid. This amendment addresses the most recent developments regarding Air Quality. Air Quality has become a primary regional concern due to the unhealthy ozone air quality levels measured in 1997-2002. The 5 -county Austin/San Marcos MSA, now known as the Austin -Round Rock MSA, may be designated nonattainment of the federal 8 -hour ozone air quality standard by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A nonattainment designation means that the area does not meet the health -based standard and will be required to implement emission reduction strategies to clean up the air. Failure to clean up the region's air, as required, can result in restrictions on industrial growth and a partial Toss of federal highway funding. Nonattainment designations are expected to occur in 2004 and a state generated emission reduction plan is expected to be due in 2007. In response to these air quality problems in the Austin -Round Rock MSA, the Clean AIR Force was formed. The Clean AIR Force is an independent, non-profit coalition comprised of representatives from govemment, environmental, and business organizations. It formulates and promotes a community -wide campaign for air quality improvement. The City of Round Rock is a member of the Clean AIR Force, along with Austin, Bastrop, Elgin, Lockhart, Luling, San Marcos, and five county commissioner courts. Optimally, the Clean AIR Force hopes to reduce vehicle emissions voluntarily to avoid designation as a nonattainment area. There is also a "transitional" classification for areas that met the previous one-hour standard for ozone of 125 parts per billion, but that violate the new eight-hour standard of 85 parts per billion. The transitional designation would be in lieu of a nonattainment designation and promises more flexibility in developing plans to come into compliance with the new ozone standard. Both the EPA and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) have endorsed the concept of early action plans to improve air quality. These plans allow local selection of emission reduction strategies, result in clean air sooner than otherwise required and are an altemative to the standard nonattainment process. Instead of waiting for a nonattainment designation, the 5 -county MSA is proactively developing and implementing early action plans to clean up the air now. The MSA has developed the 03 Flex Agreement, which addresses the 1 - hour ozone standard and implementation is underway. The MSA is now developing a Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP) as part of the Early Action Compact (EAC), which addresses the 8 -hour ozone standard. Successful implementation of the CAAP will result in compliance with the 8 -hour ozone standard in 2007, sooner than otherwise required. ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY MEMORANDUM Prepared By Rust Lichliter / Jameson 1998 In order to fully understand and evaluate the potential environmental limitations associated with the Transportation Master Plan which is being prepared for the City of Round Rock, the following environmental parameters were investigated. • Neighborhoods and Community Resources • Water Quality • Air Quality • Historical Meteorology • Hazardous Materials • Threatened and Endangered Species • Natural Areas and Ecosystems • Wetlands • Floodplains • Historic and Cultural Resources The Study Area of this project includes the City of Round Rock as well as the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The following sections describe the findings of the environmental investigation associated with this project. The discussions of neighborhoods and community resources, natural areas and ecosystems, parklands, wetlands, floodplains, and cultural resources pertain to the Study Area only, while the discussions of hazardous materials and threatened and endangered species include the Study Area as well as a one -mile buffer surrounding the Study Area. The discussions of water quality, air quality, and historical meteorology are relatively regional in nature. Neighborhoods and Community Resources The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), San Antonio District Office, was contacted for the locations of any HUD housing which may exist within the Study Area, as well as any other related concerns which HUD may have as they pertain to the Master Transportation Plan which is being prepared. According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the following HUD developments exist within the Study Area: • Bowman's Walk Apartments • Main Street Apartments 101 Bowman Drive 1201 East Main Street • Chisolm Trail Apartments • Trinity Place Apartments 1525 Chisolm Trail 1203 Cushing Drive • Chisolm Valley Apartments 1338 Christopher Avenue R:\CITY_PROJECTS\TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN\TMP 2004\FINALDOC\ENVgUM2 2004.DOC Water Quality Surface Water Quality The Study Area lies within the Brazos River Basin, which, for water quality monitoring purposes, has been divided into 55 segments. Brushy Creek, Segment 1244 of the Brazos River Basin, traverses the Study Area from west to east and roughly parallels Brushy Creek Road west of Interstate Highway 35 and U.S. Highway 79 east of Interstate Highway 35. Based on the State of Texas Water Quality Inventory (11th and 12th editions), 17 permitted domestic outfalls occur within this creek segment which stretches from the confluence of South Brushy Creek in Williamson County to the confluence with the San Gabriel River in Milam County. One of the three designated water uses for this stream segment is contact recreation (i.e., swimming); however, according to the Water Quality Inventory, this segment of the Brazos River Basin does not meet contact recreational use in the area downstream (east) of the City of Round Rock to approximately F.M. 685 due to elevated fecal coliform levels. Any designation of contact recreation is not a guarantee that the water is completely free of disease -causing organisms. Contact recreation is a use that is assigned to each water body except in cases where elevated fecal coliform bacteria densities are recurrent and caused by pollution which cannot be reasonably controlled (or in areas where ship or barge traffic makes the use unsafe). Additionally, phosphorous and nitrogen levels are elevated within this segment of Brushy Creek, which contributes to excessive growth of attached algae. Average levels of chloride and total dissolved solids greater than the standard stream criteria are also common within this segment. The other two designations for this creek include public water supply and high quality aquatic habitat. The following table details the water quality information for this segment of Brushy Creek as determined by ongoing water quality monitoring. Information for seven measured parameters, including dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, chloride, sulfate, total dissolved solids, and fecal coliform, is provided in this table. Water Quality from September and from January from Table 1: Information for Brushy Creek Segment 1, 1987 through August 31, 1991 (llth Edition) 1989 through December 1992 (12th Edition) the State of Texas Water Quality Inventory 1244 Parameter Criteria Level Number of Minimum Maximum Mean Number of Samples Observed Observed Values Outside the Criteria Level 1987 1989 1987 1989 1987 1989 1987 1989 1987 1989 1987 1989 to to to to to to to to to to to to 1991 1992 1991 1992 1991 1992 1991 1992 1991 1992 1991 1992 Dissolved Oxygen (milligrams per liter- mg/I) 5.0 5.0 33 25 6.0 6.0 13.3 16.8 8..90 9.1 0 0 Temperature in °F (°C) 91.0 90.0 33 25 52.7 54.68 86.0 87.4 70.4 76.82 0 0 (37.2) (32.8) (34.9) (12.6) (68.2) (30.8) (52.2) (24.9) R:\CITY_PROJECTS\TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN\TMP 2004\FINALDOC\ENIUM2 2004.DOC 54: 13 :C. 50 V.< $ / 0' • .'"e-' t::....,,,,....„ 1 4- '':..li'„i::) ;-.-'''-"i .: 4 ,', f.".) -.' g - \ P74, • ' 02,,, g, ,......_ • , '&;• I/ - i 4:- 4.. h. 1. .t ....'"' ...' , ... ,,,..: . ..:•,, 4 \V 1. \ `., .. ,....6, • g.... ,; ....-`' S •. 56, '4: \ .6i 1- • . ..A. .-,, 4,,i4 -``'.''., N . • 1 '‘N.."'''. . ',As. V ''''' . $1 i / ' -ts: 1 k'''', % ,,,,,, . -.1. N 6;7,...,5,, • . ..„ 0 (''' ... .., .., -‹? .. - a . ...0 :... N :-... * ' . fqr "1:!i• .01 • v.' 0 -.- .1.rfr-n,.'"'" ; -......6°.,- i -6..k.. it ..66,.,. r.. .,. . ,....„ •...„ . \ 1- .,.. :,... J "'''.. ;,.'..:-/-- '\ '' .- N , • • .. / I • "'"'.., j., 6" -*".:ek' .' ''''. „,•:..- ''..' ..e::::' ,?. 4,::::){af :, ''',..... _.*1 .:e.. .' sa;• , .:* :.A' -,.....,- 5i ;. ' .A,,‘,A5 ,:k ,, .i'i..',t:.:';',1..14:,.1.i:,A,t, ,,Zt6:\.:•::r1..f..11e"4_,.‘ ... 1..5.,,: .' N . -55;.- -„5" ' \1 ,, .. ' -''''',..'.."fri'V'', •::.,4‘.. tk,... '' .. :4A \ ....Axe— t , ,46i.',, . ',AI': -,..t.1 ..\kr.,, ..5 AA: _. . ••',•N,;,s.- ,' • .2. .k.'v*;,''. <,61..'...-.;,.,,-:.,-•.AC4.,,.,,:„-~:„,.;:•i:,„',•,-A,6-,,4„•,,,.,,-5.,,A,,...,,N,,..? ', .?•,;A';., -.,,.:•!\ s.*:. .'...\''.''4 -_-''.'.-•,'. -...... .....*".,,.-g-,.6 .-..,.,.,., 1 ..„.. ,, - ,I-,/.-▪ .1-- -1' \'' . .'. -- \ •8gq, ' gt ?,#:. I. : •:„...tte,.. ' I,- - 4 , ,-, --.:•„..,:-.4-A,Ik ->--,,....- .*, ---,-,,,---L., ...,::,..„,:,-,. 5;9 . .1,.,-.., _ s 7 • t :-.I:* ..•:-,.t...t,,,,i;;'- f, ''• ,A ::0.0...tl :,.....g? 4 .. .6 ....,-,_ A.,.°4:, 4C'''.• '''kik*, \f:f-.1:.'5 a 4. .... .;....,.... ,W.. ,,,.. • „,.. -. Va ... 1 i ''''%';''°•*'''il: \” 5 \ , 5 y 19 50 ," 40 --_-. - . i .\ .., .... . ...... g,. _.,13'-'7 .." \ . .. i \• • • *41 -:':6 -Ig -r:.•, — ---: ' ,fi fa___,,,f6A, ''•; k ir:I.,.,,,...°4 rk:' • ,:t: a a -* :' • ' i tt.,,E. kc 1 :?3? :. ,........ ,:r: ,...a.. 0,,, %,leitre, ..A' ....1 . •fvpic=„, Ti ,:r• ::A; ::A ':.: A'. , 0 '.0 0 a ‘ ''''''''. ....„.., , , 19• A 1-14§11, SU a 0, la ma a go 9 44 • a 140:4 , a 4 • 01,(.,ligsg4,4° :0444.044. a -\„ 0 0 0 0 —UM NW ma NM Wg MCMOTAWE rE,111 44ESI00E40 p/m 000 Rti WA.; Elco 010004 4 41: 44 sot itt! 44 C'EnAccE0 14. 0 Lu 0 0 0 0 4 0 4- 42 42 0 4— EC 0 0 Boundary 0 42 0 0 41 4 0 • 00) • CI - <1, 04> (0n CC E a> c 000 00) 00 to 4140) 22 • — 0:0 AC- > 0 0 440 0 04 6 E E 00 0 44 CC 140 0)4 0') 0' 0, O 0 0, — 40 0o C c — 'e - O • )) 0. 44 • 24 • Cn Ecs 2 6,„ z • - z • 0 00 01) 0 4: 0 . _ . _ • - O 4> (1) C N 0 0 a.) 0 CP • . _ L U C LH (1) 0 0 0:00 L O 0 0x :>: 711)1 -LI O 2 42 CES U ,E • < -0 • T-0 o 11E 3 LJ (JYY Edwards a Edwords Aquifer Source, Location Mop, Austin,Texos, Hill Country Foundotion,1995 cn LU) 00 O I • < u—o w .„ Environ RREXIBIT.dgn 01/08/2004 02:31:24 PM mam>,,Aft! 0000000, Veccwael Financial Analysis To evaluate the feasibility of meeting the future transportation needs for the Round Rock area, an analysis of present and anticipated future revenues was performed. The costs of anticipated transportation improvements were compared to projected revenues. The various sources of funding for transportation projects were also evaluated. Sources of Funds Funding for roadway expansion projects can be obtained from the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), the Texas Turnpike Authority (TTA), the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority (CTRMA), the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO), Williamson County, private developers, the Round Rock Transportation Development Corporation and the City. The source of funding depends on the classification of the roadway. State Funds Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) financing is provided by dedicated federal and state highway funds, but the City must compete state-wide for these funds. Even though the City has competed successfully for funding on projects like the Interstate Highway 35 (IH 35) turnarounds, which were completed in 2003, competition for funding is increasing. In 1999, TxDOT had funds available for approximately 50 percent of the State's need. In 2003, funding could only accommodate 36 percent of the need. Successfully competing for state financing is improved by matching part of the state financing with City contributions. The City is leveraging City funds for projects like the US 79 Roadway Expansion and the Greenlawn/IH 35 Interchange. Another entity controlling State funds is the Texas Turnpike Authority (TTA), which is a division of TxDOT. As stated previously, the State has less funding available to meet statewide transportation needs. This means the traditional tax - based method of financing roads is no longer sufficient to meet the state's mobility needs in a timely manner. Developing roads as turnpikes/tollways will stretch limited taxpayer dollars and accelerate construction of highway projects, resulting in congestion relief for motorists, sooner rather than later. To improve regional mobility of the residents of Round Rock, the City has participated financially in the acquisition of right-of-way for State Highway 45 (SH 45 N), which is under construction and due to be complete in 2007. The City also actively participated in the planning of SH 130, which is also under construction and due to be complete in 2007. In 2002, Williamson and Travis County joined together to create the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority (CTRMA). The Texas Legislature authorized the creation of Regional Mobility Authorities for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining turnpike projects in the state. In the face of sharp decreases in traditional funding sources and the great number of critical mobility improvements needed, the CTRMA can step in and provide more flexibility by focusing local dollars to leverage revenue bonds for major projects and construct them sooner, rather than later. The CTRMAs first project in Williamson County is US 183-A and SH 45 (SE) is under consideration as the second. The CTRMA will provide the City with another source of funds to leverage City funds. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Funds The Federal Government mandates that states sub -allocate an amount of federal highway dollars, based on population, to the Metropolitan Planning Organizations. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) receives approximately $13 million per year for local/regional roadway projects having a classification of collector or higher. The CAMPO Transportation Policy Board has total discretion over projects funded by this program. In the past, the City has leveraged CAMPO funds to obtain funding for roadway safety improvements on McNeil Road at County Road 172 and the Union Pacific Railroad and sidewalk construction on N. Mays Street. Of all the funding sources available, competition for the CAMPO funds is the strongest. CAMPO received 74 project proposals totaling approximately $195 million for fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007. After all other obligations are met, CAMPO will have approximately $26 million available for FY 2005 through 2007. County Funds Williamson County has developed a Multi -Corridor Transportation Plan to accommodate the fast paced growth experienced in the County, which includes the City of Round Rock. The City is working closely with the County to improve roadways located within both the County and the City's extra territorial jurisdiction. The City and the County have successfully leverage local funds to demonstrate a commitment to the State for expansion of US 79 and the construction of SH 45. The City and County will continue to leverage funds in the future for roadway improvements like the expansion of Kiphen Road (County Road 113). Private Funds Due to the rapid growth in the study area, many of the land developers cannot wait for the city to provide the entire transportation infrastructure. The land development community is presently building many of the new arterial roadway facilities. It is anticipated that this trend will continue in the future. Round Rock Transportation System Development Corporation Funds In August 1997, the Citizens of Round Rock authorized the adoption of an additional sales and use tax within the City at the rate of one-half of one percent, with the proceeds thereof to be used for streets, roads, drainage and other related transportation system improvements. The additional sales and use tax became effective January 1, 1998. The additional revenue is not part of the City's general operating budget but is budgeted and spent by a non-profit industrial development corporation established expressly for the above purposes with the approval of the Round Rock City Council. Since 1998, the Round Rock Transportation System Development Corporation (RRTSDC) and the City have utilized the sales tax revenue stream to leverage a maximum number of transportation projects in the City of Round Rock. The RRTSDC obtained $31 million in loans from the State of Texas Infrastructure Bank (SIB) and in 2001, issued $25.8 million in sales tax revenue bonds. Approximately $5 million of the 1/2 cent sales tax revenue stream is designated annually for the repayment of the SIB loans and the debt service on the bond issuance through 2022. The following table reflects the actual sales tax revenue through FY 2003. Due to the economic sensitivity of sales tax revenue, anticipated future revenues through 2020 are shown at a flat rate with no percentage increase. Year 1/2 -cent Sales Tax Year 1/2 -cent Sales Tax 1998 2,990,319 2011 11,300,000 1999 6,722,247 2012 11,300,000 2000 8,380,752 2013 11, 300, 000 2001 10,456,599 2014 11,300,000 2002 10, 012, 965 2015 11, 300, 000 2003 11,255,918 2016 11,300,000 2004 11,300,000 2017 11,300,000 2005 11,300,000 2018 11,300,000 2006 11,300,000 2019 11,300,000 2007 11,300,000 2020 11, 300, 000 2008 11,300,000 2009 11,300,000 2010 11,300,000 Totals $ 128, 918, 800 $ 113, 000, 000 City Funds In 2001, the City of Round Rock voters approved General Obligation Bonds including authorization of $37.1 million for streets, sidewalks, landscaping and traffic signal projects. These projects will improve the citizens' overall mobility by renovating existing streets, adding new sidewalks and traffic signals. These projects are funded through the City of Round Rock's issuance of General Obligation bonds and are not funded by the 1/2 cent additional sales tax for transportation. Transportation Plan Cost Estimates The following table shows the estimated cost to complete the plan roadway improvements for the 2010 and 2020 planning horizons. Plan Year Total Project Cost Participation By Others Round Rock's Share 2010 $ 492,226,348 $ 321,583,745 $ 170,642,603 2020 $ 231,014,778 $ 74,092,506 $ 156,922,272 Total $ 723,241,126 $ 395,676,251 $ 327,564,875 seo!AaaS uoileoodsueJ1 Great Oaks Dr. i Gattis School Rd. / CR 168 Gattis School Rd. Gattis School Rd. Forest Creek Dr. i, 2 � FM 1431 Double Creek Dr. Double Creek Dr. Double Creek Dr. .. Brightwater Blvd. Q t Creek Bend Blvd. Q I Creek Bend Blvd. 0 QNN 0 0 CR 112 2 Q CR 110 ,$- O Chisholm Trail Rd. Chisholm Trail Rd. Chandler Rd. / CR 114 Chandler Rd. / CR 114 Chander Rd.: / CR 114 Chandler Rd. / CR 114 Bowman Rd. Bowman Rd. Bowman Rd. AW Grimes Blvd. AW Grimes Blvd. AW Grimes Blvd, Arterial H Arterial H fl Arterial A Round Rock Roadway RM 620 - Arterial C Brushy Creek Rd. - RM 620 Red Bud Ln../CR 122 - SH130 AW Grimes Blvd. (Arterial B) - Red Bud Ln../CR 122 Greenlawn Blvd. - AW Grimes Blvd. BR IH 35/Mays Street - Greenlawn Blvd. Double Creek Dr. - Red Bud Ln../CR 122 a 70 g 0 Westinghouse Rd./CR 111 - Chandler Rd./CR 114 Q�Q 3 5 Cif z cri Sam Bass Rd./CR 175 - Wyoming Springs Dr Gattis School Rd./CR168 - SH 45 (N) Forest Creek Dr. - Gattis School Rd./CR 168 US 79 - Forest Creek Dr. Kiphen Rd./CR 113 - US 79 FM 1460 Klphen Rd./CR 113 Wyoming Springs Dr. - Great Oaks Dr. Creek Bend Circle - Wyoming Springs Dr. Sam Bass Rd. - Creek Bend Circle FM 3406 - Sam Bass Rd. FM 1431- FM 3406 Louis Henna Blvd./SH 45 (N) - Pliugerville Loop Kiphen Rd./CR 113 - US 79 CR110 - Klphen Rd./CR 113 FM 1460 -CR 110 CR 109 - US 79 Westinghouse/CR 111 - CR 109 CR110-CR 108 CR 122 -CR 110 Chisholm Trail Rd. -11-435 SBFR W. Old Settlers Blvd./FM 3406 - Sam Bass Rd Existing Chisholm Trail - W. Old Settlers Blvd./FM 3406 FM 1431 - Existing Chisholm Trail n m O T 3 FM1460-CR110 Sunrise Rd./CR 115 FM 1460 IH 35 (N) - Sunrise Rd./CR 115 Sunrise Rd. - FM 1460 N. Mays St./BR IH 35 - Sunrise Rd. IH 35 - N. Mays St./BR H 35 Gattis School Rd. - Louis Henna Blvd./SH 45 (N) Lake Creek Gattis School Rd. US 79 - Lake Creek Westinghouse Rd./CR 111 - Chandler Rd./CR 114 Wyoming Springs Dr. - IH 35 Sam Bass Rd - Wyoming Springs Dr. Deep Wood Dr. - SH 45 (N) Sam Bass Rd. - RM 620 (at Deep Wood Dr.) Forest Creek - Louis Henna/Meister/SH 45(N) US 79 - Forest Creek CR112/CR117-US79 Westinghouse Rd./CR 111 - CR 112/CR 117 Limits MAD 4 MAU2/4 MAU 4 MAU 4 MAU 4 /MAD4 N MNR 2 MAU 4 MAU 4 MAD / MAU 2 MAD 4 MAD4 A MAU 0/2 MAU2 z N 70! N MNR 2 N MNR 2 MAU 2 MAU 2 c N I ! p. MAD 4 1 MAD/MAU4 MAU 4 1 MAU 4 o P 1 MAD 6 � I ! I i I I Existing Typical Section MAD 4 MAD 4 MAD MAD 4 MAD 4 MAD 4 g A g A MAD 4 MAD 4 MAD 4 N MAD 6 MAD 4 1/2 of MAD › 0 A 2010 Proposed Typical Section <1> N pQO O v> , N N P. ,8� p (A N 8S O r . , _ </> N 8� O 40 -� N $ 5,175,000 fd! j011 ."pW".� V N .:: ..pp co (A CT U N FCQ�T ,�8+ 'v u> C.� t (A N) 8P O N W ;8-+ O Is 3,558,056 (A A n) oDO 2010 Total Cost MAD 4 MAD 4 > 0 A MAD 4 MAD 4 MAD 4 MAD 4 MAD 4 r > A 2 0 A MAD 4 MAD 4 A MAD 4 MAD 4 MAD4 MAD 4 g p MAD 6 MAD 4 MAD 4 MAD 6 1 1/2 of MAD 6 MAD 4 2020 Proposed Typical Section S 1,952,571 <1) N o 4s O� 4) o' Utt g `1 - .<.„ wpp .... iN (n o ..0CL9 N N .tOa O (A v N CO (> o �Vo -O 00 (A A C OW 4) w V> ;o A P N N -• .pp A' N o N ,OO H ca Soo O S 4,255,218 LS 9,351,429 N :4 pNN W S 5,591,621 S 10,595,785 N N `P" (71 () .93 - N c.) p c. No N :a 3 N 2020 Total Cost MAD 6 MAD 6 MAD8 MAD 8 MAD 4 1 MAD 4 MAD 6 MAD 6 1 MAD 4 MAD 4 Ultimate Proposed Typical Section p W O 8 I £00L S S 8 1003 $SHO oL� R . 808 888 O N O q O C 001. 1 H WOQ, Ultimate Right -of -Way Yes N Yes 1 Yes Yes Yes Bicycle Facility n rt O m O 0. O 0 a1 .O O 0 N m 1 0 m 0 0. a) a) 0• se3!Ajes uoileJodSU J L Sunrise Rd. Sunrise Rd. SH 45 (N) / Louis Henna Blvd. SH 45 (N) / Louis Henna Blvd. �f • 2 Sco SH130 SH130 Sam Bass Rd. / CR 175 Sam Bass Rd. / CR 175 '' Sam Bass Rd. / CR 175 RaundRock Ave, / RM 620 Round Rock Ave. / RM 620 Rpund Rock Ave / RM 620 RM 620 Red Bud Ln. / CR 122 Red Bud Ln. / CR 122 '" N Quick Hill Rd. / CR 172 Quid{ HU Rd 1 CR 172 Palm Valley Blvd. / US 79 • •, +O Palm Valley Blvd. / US 79 • �O Old Settlers Blvd. (East) �� K Old Settlers Blvd. (West) / FM 3406 Q O'Connor Dr Q• McNeil Rd. McNeil Rd. Mays St. Mays St. L000 1 / MOPAC Blvd. La Frontera Blvd. Klphen Rd. IH 35 (i IH 35 IH35 S cn IH 35 Hesters Crossing CI) Greenlawn Blvd. Greenlawn Blvd. Round Rock Roadway E. Old Settler's Blvd./FM 3406 - US 7S Chandler Rd./CR 114 - E. Old Settler's Blvd./FM 340E AW Grimes Bivd/Grand Avenue Parkway - SH 130 (N) Greenlawn Blvd. - AW Grimes Blvd/CR 170 IH 35 (ND- Greenlawn Blvd. FM 1325/Loop 1 - IH 35 (N) RM 620 - FM 1325/Loop 1 Gattis School Rd./CR 168 - SH 45 (N) fA • (� c cn V• Meadows Dr. East - IH 35 (N) FM 3406 - Meadows Dr. East - New Hope Dr. - FM 1431 At Union Pacific Railroad N. Lake Creek Dr. - IH 35 (N) 3 ,• O'Connor Dr. - Wyoming Springs Dr SH 45 (N) O'Connor Dr. Gattis School Rd./CR 168 - SH 45 (N) w 0.a c V n W � SH 45 (N) - FM 1325 McNeil Rd. - SH 45 (N) CR 122 - FM 685/SH 130 (N) FM 1460 - CR 122 N. Mays St./BR IH 35 - FM 1460 IH 35 (N) N. Mays St./BR IH 35 Greenhill Dr. East - FM 1460 _ Wyoming Springs Dr. (Sam Bass Rd.) - IH 35 (N) 0' NN Great Oaks Dr. - RM 620 Avery Ranch Rd. - Great Oaks Dr. IH 35 (N) - S. Mays St./BR IH 35 Quick Hill Rd./CR 172 - IH 35 (N) SH 45 - CR 172/Quick Hill Rd. At Resters Crossing Lake Creek - IH 35 (N) Brushy Creek - Lake Creek E. Old Settler's Blvd./FM 3406 - Brushy Creek SH 45 (N) - Parmer Ln.. Nesters Crossing - SH 45 (N) Double Creek Dr. - CR 122 At Greenlawn Blvd. Between Resters Crosslna and SH 45 RM 620 - SH 45 (N) FM 3406 - RM 620 Westinghouse Rd./CR 111 - FM 3406 Westinghouse Rd./CR 111 - FM 1431 0 al IH 35 (N) - Quick Hill Rd./CR 172 SH 45 (N) - IH 35 (N) Gattis School Rd./CR 168 - SH 45 (N) MAU 4 MAD4 MAU 4/— MAD 6 • MAD 6 l i f i MAU 4 MAU 2 N MNR 2 / MAD 4 1 MAD 4 MAD 4 MAU 4 MAU4 MNR 2 N MNR 2 I` MAU 4 MAU 4 MAU 4 / MAU4 MAU4/MAD4 MAD 4 P MAD 4 MAD4:. MAU 4 i MAD 4 1 MAD 4 1 MAU 4/2 1— MAU 4 MAU 2 I o A MAU 4 1 MAD 4 Ao I A zi N i MAD4 MAD 4 MAD 4 Existing Typical Section moll FWY 6 Boa 1 Toll PKY 6 I o PKV6 o Separati 1 MAD6 MAD 4 MAD 4 MAD 4 g MAD 6 i MAD6 MAD 4 g MAD 4 Interchange 0 g (a C Ramps, Frontage Road & Turnarounds 2010 Proposed Typical Section O 01 co 0 z •.. 0 O 01 `-.1 41 Cl pQ v pQ' 0 pQ v $ 6,500,000 N P. O pQQ v V) W ,CN71 ,;. ', ry.; N — O- coW N<5 4W W pO 0 Co • .COW in V A to .epa I ..pp8 OHO 0 N .0p� 0 888 p (n pV 0 0 Q. 0 0 S 6,000,000 2010 Total Cost MAD4 MAD4 MAD 6 2020 Proposed Typical Section 0> cn § V/ ,Q § w .73 A ,0 COh N N 2020 Total Cost MAD4 I MAD4 D 0 co Q CO D 0 MAD 8 1 D 0 a - D 0 CO MAD 8 MAD 6 MAD 6 Q o>A Dco 0 MAD 6 MAD 6 [ MAU 4/MAD 4 °' FWY 8/HOV 00 co MAD 6 Ultimate Proposed Typical Section 120 00 toot 120 120 Ultimate Right -of -Way Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Bicycle Facility C) 0 33 0 0. 33 0 0 0 1 N 0) 0 7 0) N rt 0 1 a> 1 0 a) 0. 0) 1< a) cr wr.)� n� -T1 (i) y-, ��-U Et 0 KK_, ; CC/ 3<< C)aQ CO Dc 0 , , o 0mm _ �3mKKK�g (D -, 0- x CD 0. &o �� QQ1 >>>o< 0K0 0�,"44,< CD 0 0 0 -- (D N Q li Q Q Q 3 3 = a(D Q c o ao 0 CD C0 a< �O� CO D 0-° o m a 0Q� a Q 7 W a7 Q n QOD y Q° N n 5 (D N 0 (" N a 0 Cn 3 a) 00 3 P 0 0 0 --+ Q O 0_ (D Q =. (0DD 5 ? a coW 0 ,� Q V, Q O * Q a. 0 (1 0 na Q a _2 j (D 7 0 3 (Q 0 Q 0- 0 '< � (D C 0 3 O O Q 7 (D (D 0 -� 0 5 a 0 Q a (Q Q N 0 a (0 (D 0 m a 3 0 5 a' (D a D- o- (D `< N 0 T. a 0 5 _. 0 0 0 y. CD O 0 a am '^^ 1 (/'D� clot 0 J (D (0 3 5 0 cD 0 0 a () -< N a (.Q 0 N ( 0 D 0 -o (y O (D N seoiAJeg uoileiodsueal 33 33- 5a (0 544, , ; 00 3 lo!Jew - OZ9 W?J (0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 coQ Q D 0 0 S V. W 3 N b GdIA1 Z/ 3 v zz N N D 0 N 0- P 1S00 10101 OIOZ D 0 D 0 -I N < O �j O 0 u CD -0 0 0 7 o. 01, co W P N V 1S0o 10101 OZOZ D 0 c -' n O 0 -41 0 O 0 O cn 7 0 0. 8 c 8 c 0 33 o m p City of Round Rock Transportation Master Plan Roadway Table � `at c ',4,v ✓ ROUNDROCKTEXAS PURPOSE PASSM, PROSPERITY a mz �av`Y=""ter �dmv ,�6 � ^' � N, 1.THE FOLLOWING ROAD SEGMENTS MUST BE COMPLETED `. IN SEQUENCE,AS DESCRIBED BELOW: ARTERIAL C FROM RM 6120 TO SH 45. eARTERIAL C FROM SAM BASS ROAD TO RM 620. e,5 , � 0 WYOMING SPRINGS DRIVE AP DIOR GREAT OAK DRIVE AND/OR O'CONNER DRIVE FROM RPA 620 vk q § a� TO ARTERIAL C. 2.THIS MAP REFLECTS PROPOSED CORRIDOR ONLY. I xr y FINAL ALl6,PINlFTdT WILLF[3TL2 AWED I TGIF SUBDIVISION PLATTING PROCESS. 3.TRAILS ARE SHOWN FC'Df2 REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT REFLECT THE MOST t3ECFIVT VER I N OF THE TRAIL MASTER PLAN, TRAIL L�CAT1d�h3 SHOWN HEREON ARE FORINFORMATION PURPOSES AND ARE NOT ADOPTED AS PART OF THE V � � ,,. �„-W �' TRANSPORTATIONA$"fFF2 PLAN_ br MARCH 2004 Freeway - t S _ .., Freeway(Flew Location} :,,...,,„ Scale(feet) sd H Lane > I 0 1375 2750 4125 5540 8 Lane(Neon Location) 2 T ., .. :.6 Lane . r w i > ) { - 6Larre(New Location) ff 4 Lana Huggins/Seiler ns/Seiler pp__ g g� 4 Lane(New Location) l ,"`�' ': B - & Associates, Ll s 9 pi x:. wa..„ ..'.. _ 2 Lane 16 East ain ,..Bicycle Facility :. ': `:stt `„`_< '� � ' ° "", tl �_ 1(57.2) 82810406 Street toll freel: (866) TEX ROAD g � www,hsaeagineering,rom J-11 ,tet, a .r, k vers Existing Trails ® .m Proposed Trails a m DATE: SUBJECT: ITEM: Department: Staff Person: March 19, 2004 City Council Meeting - March 25, 2004 13.E.1. Consider an ordinance adopting a Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan. (Second Reading) Transportation Services Tom Martin, Director of Transportation Services David Bartels, Project Manager Justification: The Transportation Master Plan requires periodic amendments to ensure the Citizens of Round Rock are afforded an adequate future transportation system. The Transportation Master Plan, along with the Transportation Element of the General Plan, provides the direction for developing a City transportation system that serves the needs of all residents. Funding: Cost: N/A Source of funds: N/A Outside Resources: Background Information: Public Comment: Huggins/Seiler & Associates, LP Due to changing roadway requirements, both internal and external to the City, Transportation Services has prepared an amendment to the Transportation Master Plan, as well as the Transportation Element of the 2000 General Plan. The amendment affects the text, roadway map and table and includes content and format changes, alignment changes, a new roadway, new planning horizons and a bicycle element, which integrates arterial bicycle facilities with the Parks and Recreation Department Trails Master Plan. The Transportation Master Plan was presented during Public Hearings for the amendment to the Transportation Element of the General Plan. The hearings were held by the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 17, 2003, January 14, 2004 and February 18, 2004.