R-2016-4003 - 12/13/2016 RESOLUTION NO. R-2016-4003
WHEREAS, Section 395.058 of the Texas Local Government Code ("the Act") requires the
Capital Improvement Advisory Committee ("CIAC") to report to the City Council the progress of the
capital improvements plan and any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the
impact fee; and
WHEREAS, the CIAC is also required to advise the Council of the need to update the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plan and impact fees; and
WHEREAS, the CIAC has submitted a Capital Improvement Plan Progress Semi-Annual
Report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the attached Capital Improvement Plan Progress
Semi-Annual Report and has determined same to be in compliance with the Act,Now Therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK,TEXAS,
That the Capital Improvement Plan Progress Semi-Annual Report, attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein, is hereby approved.
The City Council hereby finds and declares that written notice of the date, hour, place and
subject of the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted was posted and that such meeting was
open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Resolution and the subject matter
hereof were discussed, considered and formally acted upon, all as required by the Open Meetings Act,
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended.
RESOLVED this 13th day of December, 2016.
U "
ALAN MCGRAW, Mayor
City of Round Rock, Texas
ATTEST:
SARA L. WHITE, City Clerk
0112.1604;00368547
EXHIBIT
ROUND ROCK TEXAS
UTILITIES ANo ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
city Of Rwund ROck
SII I i des &
environmental Services
Department
Capital Improvements
Plan Progress
Semi--Annual Report
November 2016
SUMMARY
The Local Government Code Section 395.058 requires the Capital
Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC) to report to the political
subdivision the progress of the capital improvements plan and any
perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the impact
fee. Included herein is the semi-annual report for the reporting period
of October 1 2015 to September 30, 2016. This report includes an
updated assessment of the actual growth rate in comparison to the
projections and assumptions made in the report; projects completed or
initiated during the period; and impact fees collected during the period.
These comparisons are used as indicators of the need to update the land
use assumptions, capital improvements plan or impact fees.
The local government code also requires the Capital Improvement
Advisory Committee to advise the City Council of the need to update the
land use assumptions, capital improvements plan and impact fees.
These items were last updated by the City in November 2015.
1 11/10/2016
Figure 1 represents Ground and Surface water use, along with the
number of active water services over the past two years. Although the
City continues to grow, the total water production has remained fairly
level over the past two years. Part of this reason could be because
water usage is dependent on weather patterns; however, the City's
conservation and reuse water programs are also affecting the amount
of potable water usage by the City. New water services continue to
increase, but at a slower pace compared to the early 2000's.
Figure 1
Water Treatment Plant
3,000 --- — --- - 33
32.8
2,500 rn
M
C 32.6 H
O 7
2,000 s' O
IF ...+.+•"�' �''- 32.4
Y
•W
� 1,500
m 32
C
O 1,000 Q
tfo 31.8 O
v L
d
500
31.6
r.
Z
0 31.4
4th Qtr FY 1st Qtr FY 2nd Qtr FY 3rd Qtr FY 4th Qtr FY ist Qtr FY 2nd Qtr FY 3rd Qtr FY 4th Qtr FY
'14 '15 '15 '15 '15 '16 '16 '16 116
—M-Ground Water 210,340,000 159,320,000 114620,000 121,340,000 226,270,000 15%340,000j196,240,000 217,310,000 222,590,000
—*—Surface Water 1,922,970,00 1,299,370,00 1,030,260,00 1,282,620,00 2,426,800,001,492,430,00 1,211,910,00 T,41 6 2,044,500,00
—4—Active Services 32012 32127 32375 32418 32588 32574 1 32703 32732 1 32930
2 11/10/2016
Figure 2 reflects the monthly potable water production over the past five
years. As can be expected, the average daily demand increases during
the summer months; however, total water production is dependent on
weather conditions, which effects discretionary water usage.
Figure 2
Average Potable Daily Demand Each Month
40
-
35
r
30
X
25
c 24
�:.
23
f
20
17
X15 I
{{ �.
F.
k 7
10
� r 1
5
1 {
0 - —
F. — -
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
LI 2012 U 2013 a 2014 112015 a 2016
3 11/10/2016
Figure 3 reflects the monthly potable treated water production and the
Type I Reuse treated water production. The City's reuse water system
began production in October 2012 with three customers: Old Settlers
Park, Dell Diamond, and Forest Creek Golf Course. Since that time, the
City has expanded the system to include Forest Creek HOA, Legends
Village Subdivision, Austin Community College, Texas A&M Health
Science Center, the Forest Grove and Vizcaya Subdivisions. The City
continues to promote the reuse water system in the Northeast part of
Round Rock and as depicted in Figure 3, the demand continues to grow.
Figure 3
Potable vs. Reuse Water
Average Daily Demand Each Month
36 - - --- -- -- ---- ---- —
32 - - LTJ
28
24
j
I � i
o20
12
s
� f
a i f i
L `
L .I_
October November December January February March April May June July August September
Q FY-13 Average Potable Treated FY-14 Average Potable Treated FY-15 Average Potable Treated m Average Reuse Treated
4 11/10/2016
Figure 4 shows the number of Single-Family Building Permits issued
annually. The number of new housing starts per year in the City of
Round Rock has ranged from 222 to 480 over the past eight years.
Single-family permits have remained steady over the past year due to
new subdivisions available within the City. We are expecting an increase
in permits during the first quarter of FY-17 due to four new subdivision
or new sections in existing subdivision to be released. Of the 419 permits
issued in FY-16, 310 have been for single-family residences and 109
have been for townhomes. Several Municipal Utility Districts (MUDS)
that are located in Round Rock's extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ)
continue to experience a steady number of single-family housing starts
over this same time period as well.
Figure 4
Annual Single-Family Building Permits Issued
Residential & MUDs
800 -
750 718
700 -- Q'; 677
650
600 _-___ _— _ _—_--.-----__-___. -- 581 __ 591
_
550 -- 526 -_ 556 535
___- ----
500 --- -----
---
450 --- -- _.__�__ ---- --- --- — -
400 ____ -.--_._
350 - _-_ 338 .. .--
300
250
200 —_ -- -- — _
150
100 -
50 -------- __.___
0
FY-2009 FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2014 FY-2015 FY-2016
■Round Rock ■ Paloma MUD#1 d Paloma MUD#2 ®Tera Vista#10 z Tera Vista#11 3 Walsh Ranch
5 11/10/2016
Table 1 represents the number of Multi-Family Building Permits issued
annually. During FY-07, a large number of new apartment complexes
were constructed within the City. This is reflected in the amount of
impact fees collected during that year. The following years did not see
this amount of multi-family construction; however, the population
continued to grow despite the fewer permits issued. In FY-14, there
was an increase in the number of multi-family projects either under
construction or beginning construction; however, these projects were
permitted in FY-13, as shown in the table below. For FY-16, there are a
number of multi-family complexes that are either under construction or
in permit review. Currently, there are four projects with 1200 units
under construction with another four projects either in for permit or in
preliminary planning.
Table 1
Fiscal Year
Units Permitted
FY 2005 538
FY 2006 56
FY 2007 2147
FY 2008 224
FY 2009 274
FY 2010 130
FY 2011 0
FY 2012 280
FY 2013 884 (124 LUES)
FY 2014 334 (63.5 LUEs)
FY 2015 792 (302 LUEs)
FY 2016 608 (157 LUEs)
Note: The number of LUEs that were determined for these developments are
shown in parenthesis.
6 11/10/2016
Table 2 reflects the number of New Commercial Building Permits issued
annually. Over the past several years this amount has been steady,
ranging from 20 to 30 permits annually. However, in FY-13 and FY-14,
there was a significant increase in New Commercial Building Permits,
specifically for restaurants, hospitals, medical clinics, banks, convenient
stores, and office buildings.
Table 2
Fiscal Year Commercial
Building Permits
FY 2009 30
FY 2010 29
FY 2011 27
FY 2012 20 (100 LUES)
FY 2013 37 (185 LUES)
FY 2014 33 (165 LUEs)
FY 2015 47 (202 LUEs)
FY 2016 63 (442.5 LUEs)
Note: The number of LUEs that were determined for these developments are
shown in parenthesis.
There has been an increase in new commercial building from last year.
In FY-15, we had 47 permits and in FY-16, we issued 63. Some of the
major projects include: hotels, senior living facilities, medical offices,
retail, etc.
7 11/10/2016
Table 3 and Figure 5 summarize the impact fees collected from FY-12 thru
FY-16 for Residential and Commercial Building Permits. For FY-15 and FY-
16, there is an increase in the amount of impact fees collected due to the
construction that is occurring in single-family residential, multi-family
residential and commercial developments.
Table 3
Impact Fees FY-12 FY-13 FY-14 FY-15 FY-16
Residential
Water $ 2,685,030 $ 2,407,646 $ 961,767 $ 1,616,580 $ 1,516,823
Commercial $ 364,718 $ 1,296,258 $ 941,463 $ 2,273,857 $ 2,
342,270
Water
Wholesale Water W v N/A _ N/A
_^$ 1,163,887 $ 1,035,951 $ 1,117,590
Residential
Sewer $ 1,083,701 $ 1,106,716 $ 322,936 $ 618,240 $ 701,551;
Commercial
Sewer $ 137,223 $ 477,758 $ 398,361 $ 1,084,193 $ 1,020,587
Wholesale Sewer N/A N/A _ $ 920,972 $ 1,304,686 $ 1,529,0961
Total Collected $ 4,270,672 $ 5,288,378 $ 4,709,386 $ 7,933,507 $ 8,227,917
8 11/10/2016
Figure 5
Impact Fees Collected FY 2012-2016
$8,227,917
$9,000,000 $T,933307
$8,000,000 i? `
$7,000,000
$6,000,000 $4 270,672 $5,288,378 �
$4,709,386
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
FY-12 FY-13 FY-14 FY-15 FY-16
■Residential Water A Commercial Water 1 Wholesale Water A Residential Sewer d Commercial Sewer a Wholesale Sewer
In 2015, the latest version of the water model assumed that 1,524 LUEs
per year would be added to the water system. For an impact fee of
$4,025 per LUE, this would indicate that the City should have collected
approximately $6.13 million per year in water impact fees if the City
would be growing as projected.
The wastewater model assumed that 1,089 LUEs would be added to the
wastewater system per year. For an impact fee of $2,099 per LUE, this
would indicate that the City should have collected approximately $2.29
million per year in wastewater impact fees if the City would be growing
as projected.
Comparing these assumptions to the actual impact fees collected
indicates that new connections to our water and wastewater systems
are occurring as projected.
9 11/10/2016
Table 4 provides population projections for Round Rock and Round
Rock's ETJ over the coming years. These projections, anticipating a
steady growth rate, indicated that in order to keep up with growth,
capital improvements to the City's water and wastewater utility systems
would be necessary. However, 2012-2016 estimates, shown in
parenthesis, indicate the City's population growth rate is slightly slower
than projected.
Table 4
Inside City City's ETJ
Year Projections Growth Rate Projections Growth Rate
2010 (Census) 99,887 - 141,807 -
2011 100,659 0.8% 143,960 1.5%
2012 102,349 / (101,702) 1.7% (1.0%) 147,027 2.1%
2013 104,805 / (102,349) 2.4% (0.6%) 151,133 2.8%
2014 107,635 / (103,494) 2.7% (1.1%) 155,613 3.0%
2015 110,757 / (105,405) 2.9% (1.9%) 160,385 3.1%
2016 113,968 / (107,158) 2.9% (1.7%) 165,024 2.9%
2017 117,160 2.8% 169,213 2.5%
2018 1201440 2.8% 173,490 2.5%
2019 123,812 2.8% 177,859 2.5%
2020 127,279 2.8% 1821323 2.5%
2021 130,461 2.5% 186,062 2.1%
2022 1331723 2.5% 189,881 2.1%
2023 1371066 2.5% 193,508 1.9%
2024 140,492 2.5% 197,218 1.9%
2025 143,302 2.0% 200,312 1.6%
2026 146,168 2.0% 203,462 1.6%
2027 149,092 2.0% 206,670 1.6%
2028 152,073 2.0% 209,651 1.4%
2029 155,115 2.0% 212,693 1.5%
2030 158,217 2.0% 215,795 1.5%
Notes: 2010 is the base year for these projections
( ) Annual Estimates by Planning & Development Services Department
10 11/10/2016
Table 5 provides a summary of the Water System Capital Improvement
Projects that have been completed or are in progress since the last
impact fee analysis was completed in November 2015. In addition,
projects that are anticipated over the next 10 years are also shown
below. Table 5
Completed Water Projects Completion Cost
Water Distribution System Model 2012 $ 200,000
2012 Water Distribution System Master Plan & 2012 $ 132,000
Impact Fee
BCRUA Phase 1A - Construction Management & 2012 $ 1,507,000
Inspection Services
BCRUA Raw Water Line & Intake Barge, Contract 1 2012 $ 8,590,000
BCRUA Raw Water Line & Intake Barge, Contract 2 2012 $ 1,691,000
BCRUA Raw Water Line & Intake Barge, Contract 3 2012 $ 1,134,000
BCRUA Treated Water Line - Phase 1, Segment 1 2012 j $ 3,608,000
BCRUA Treated Water Line - Phase 1, Segment 2A 2012 $ 364,000
BCRUA Treated Water Line - Phase 1, Segment 2B 2012 $ 5,168,000
BCRUA Treated Water Line - Phase 1, Segment 2C 2012 $ 3,350,000
BCRUA Water Treatment Plant - Phase 1A 2012 $ 19,048,000
Clearwell at RR-WTP 2012 $ 2,851,000
BCRUA Treated Water Line - Phase 1, Segment 3 2015 $ 8,749,000
University Blvd Water Line Phase 1 2015 $ 1,877,000
Parcel 150 2015 $ 3,144,000
CR 112 Phase 2 - 24" Water Line (890 PP) 2015 $ 888,000
Water Distribution System Master Plan & Impact Fee 2015 $ 141,000
$ 62,442,000
Water Projects In Progress Completion ; Cost
Arterial H Waterline 2015 $ 1,503,000
$ 1,503,000
1 1 11/10/2016
Upcoming Water Projects
Estimated Estimated
Completion Cost
BCRUA Water Treatment Plant - Phase 1B 2017 $ 31,000
South Creek Water Line 2018 $ 617,000
Ground Water Treatment Plant at Lake Creek 2018 $ 6,707,000
Water Distribution System Master Plan & Impact Fee 2018 $ 150,000
Southeast Red Bud Lane Water Lines 2019 $ 559,000
Saddle Brook Water Lines 2019 $ 598,000
Double Creek Water Line 2019 $ 1,841,000
Round Rock Glen Water Lines 2019 $ 1,169,000
Brenda Lane Water Lines 2019 $ 1,141,000
Palm Valley Water Line 2019 $ 1,484,000
BCRUA Water Treatment Plant - Phase 1C 2019 $ 4,152,000
Avery Center East 2019 $ 2,915,000
Meadow Lake Lines 2019 $ 969,000
Arterial A Water Line 2020 $ 5,012,000
Water Distribution System Master Plan & Impact Fee 2021 $ 154,000
Parcel 185 2022 $ 817,000
RR1431 Water Line 2022 $ 1,827,000
2.0 MGD Elevated Storage Tank (PP 890) 2022 $ 5,029,000
East Loop II 2022 $ 6,619,000
Barton Hill EST Parallel Water Line 2022 $ 1,624,000
Red Bud Lane Water Line 2022 $ 2,312,000
East Loop III 2022 $ 7,203,000
BCRUA Raw Water Line - Phase 2A, Segment 5 2023 $ 16,866,000
BCRUA Deep Water Intake 2023 $ 23,821,000
BCRUA Water Treatment Plant - Phase 1D 2023 $ 1,047,000
$ 94,664,000
12 11/10/2016
Table 6 provides a summary of the Wastewater System Capital
Improvement Projects that have been completed or are in progress
since the last impact fee analysis was completed in November 2015. In
addition, projects that are anticipated over the next 10 years are also
shown below.
Table 6
Completed Wastewater Projects Completion Cost
Chandler Creek 1 (Lower) 2013 $ 424,000
McNutt Creek C3 2014 $ 940,000
McNutt Creek C9 2015 $ 1,471,000
McNutt Creek C13 2015 $ 561,000
Chandler Creek 1 (Upper) 2015 $ 573,000
Wastewater Master Plan and Impact Fee 2015 $ 165,000
Update
$ 4,134,000
Wastewater Projects in Progress Completion Cost
Lake Creek 2 2017 $ 1,916,000
Lake Creek 3 2017 $ 563,000
McNutt Creek C2 (referred to as C5) 2017 $ 1,762,000
$ 4,241,000
Upcoming Wastewater Projects Estimated Estimated
Completion Cost
Chandler Creek 2 2017 $ 4281000
Brushy Creek 2 2017 $ 349,000
Chandler Creek 3 2018 $ 655,000
McNutt Creek 15 (referred to as 12) 2018 $ 488,000
Dry Creek 2019 $ 856,000
McNutt Creek C10 2019 $ 937,000
Forest Creek Lift Station 2019 $ 223,000
McNutt Creek D2 2020 $ 3,339,000
McNutt Creek C4 2020 $ 154,000
13 11/10/2016
Upcoming Wastewater Projects Estimated i Estimated
Continued... Completion I Cost
Hilton Head LS 2020 $ 17,000
Lake Creek 1 2021 $ 1,287,000
Lake Creek 4 2021 $ 1,712,000
McNutt Creek C12 2022 $ 714,000
SE Annex LS 2022 $ 616,000
Forest Creek 2 2022 $ 1,948,000
McNutt Creek D4 2022 $ 1,108,000
Onion Creek 1 2022 $ 1341000
McNutt Creek C6 2022 $ 202,000
Onion Creek 2 2022 $ 99,000
Spanish Oak 1 2022 $ 1,179,000
McNutt Creek D5 2022 $ 748,000
Mayfield Park 2 2022 $ 1,549,000
McNutt Creek C8b 2022 $ 649,000
Mayfield Park 1 2022 $ 3111000
WWTP Expansion 1 2023 $ 39,179,000
F- $ 58,881,000
14 11/10/2016
Figure 6 provides a comparison of the Single-Family Residential Utility
Rates for Round Rock customers versus surrounding Central Texas City
customers. As depicted, Round Rock utility rates remain some of the
lowest in the region.
Figure 6
Single-Family Residential
Water and Wastewater Rates Comparison
(monthly cost)*
$200 -
$180
$160 $ 153.48 $ 150.90.
$140 -- $ 134.60
$ 123.75
$120 — ---- ------$ 96.69
--- - -----$..92.45 - --
$100 -- – - $ 85.30
$80 - -- --- _ $ 79.98
�— _
$63.65
$60 -
$40 —
$20 ---- -- - - --
$0 -- — - -
Hutto Austin San Marcos Leander Cedar Park Cedar Park Pflugerville Round Rock Georgetown
(Stage 3)
■Water s Wastewater
* assumes 10,000 gallons water & 8,000 gallons wastewater used
15 11/10/2016
Table 7 compares Round Rock's Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to
other Central Texas cities. Historically, Round Rock had one of the
highest total impact fees charged for new connections to the water and
wastewater systems. However, several of the surrounding cities have
increased their fees over the past few years and have surpassed Round
Rock. Round Rock's philosophy is for new customers and developments
to pay for the capital improvements that are required due to the growth.
Table 7
Area Impact Fee Comparison
Last
Water .
dated
Manville WSC 2008 j $2,800 n/a I $2,800
Brushy Creek MUD 2012 $2,095 $1,804 $3,899
Cedar Park 2013 $2,250 $2,000 $4,250
Georgetown 2010
L
$3,511 $1,694 $5,205
Leander 2012 $3,880 $1,615 $5,495
i
Jonah Water SUD 2013 ' $4,636 $1,068 $5,704
Hutto 2013 $3,625 $2,128 $5,753
San Marcos 2013 $2,285 $3,506 $5,791
Round Rock 2016 i $4,025 $2,099 $6,124
Georgetown 2010 $3,511 $2,927 $6,438
(South San Gabriel Basin) _
Pflugerville 2014 $4,241 $2,725 $6,966
Austin 2014 $5,400 $2,200 $7,600
16 11/10/2016
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The CIAC and City Council approved the new Impact Fees which went
into effect March 1, 2016. Although the projected population growth in
Round Rock is proceeding at a slightly slower rate than what was
anticipated in the impact fee report, this has not caused a significant
concern since the number of connections to the water and wastewater
systems are occurring at the projected rate anticipated by the City.
As a result of the potential volatility in growth rates and infrastructure
requirements, the City recommends the impact fees be reviewed every
three years so that the fees are set according to the growth patterns
and needs of the water and wastewater utility system improvements.
The next Capital Improvements Plan Progress Report will be presented
to the CIAC and to the City Council in approximately six months.
17 11/10/2016
' Mayor Councilmembers City Manager
Alan McGraw Rene Flores Laurie Hadley
Frank Leff ingwell
Will Peckham
R(09U�NE R Cl( TEXAS Mayor Pro-Tem Writ Baese City Attorney
PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT SERVICEs DEPARTMENT Craig Morgan Kris Whitfield Stephan L.Sheets
November 17, 2016
Mayor McGraw
Mayor Pro-Tem Morgan
Councilmember Flores
Councilmember Leffingwell
Councilmember Peckham
Councilmember Baese
Councilmember Whitfield
RE: Capital Improvements Advisory Committee - Semi-Annual Meeting
Dear Mayor McGraw and Council Members:
The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee met on November 16, 2016, to consider
and approve the semi-annual report to the City Council with respect to the progress of the
Capital Improvements Plan and identification of any perceived inequities in the impact fees.
The following information is being provided to you pursuant to § 395.058(c) of the Texas
Local Government Code.
After discussion, the Committee found no perceived inequities in implementing the plan or
imposing the impact fee. Therefore, a motion was made to approve and forward the report
to the City Council, with updated city comparison data.
Sin
e
David Pavliska, Chairman
Capital Improvements Advisory Committee
CITY OF ROUND ROCK 301 West Bagdad,Suite 210,Round Rock,Texas 78664
Planning[P] 512.218.5428 - Code Enforcement[P] 512.341.3329 - [F]512.218.3286 - roundrocidexas.gov